
==== Front
Wellcome Open Res
Wellcome Open Res
Wellcome Open Research
2398-502X
F1000 Research Limited London, UK

39221439
10.12688/wellcomeopenres.20977.1
Method Article
Articles
Development of a conceptual framework to understand the stakeholder’s perspectives on needs and readiness of rural tele-practice for childhood communication disorders
[version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]

Jesudass Neethi Conceptualization Data Curation Formal Analysis Investigation Methodology Resources Writing – Original Draft Preparation Writing – Review & Editing https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6051-8990
1
Ramkumar Vidya Conceptualization Data Curation Formal Analysis Funding Acquisition Investigation Methodology Project Administration Resources Supervision Validation Writing – Original Draft Preparation Writing – Review & Editing https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3590-6721
a1
Kumar Shuba Conceptualization Formal Analysis Investigation Methodology Supervision Validation Writing – Review & Editing 2
Venkatesh Lakshmi Conceptualization Formal Analysis Investigation Methodology Supervision Validation Writing – Review & Editing https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1918-6998
3
1 Department of Audiology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to be University), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600116, India
2 SAMARTH, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600004, India
3 Department of Speech Language Pathology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to be University), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600116, India
a vidya.ramkumar@sriramachandra.edu.in
No competing interests were disclosed.

8 5 2024
2024
9 23916 4 2024
Copyright: © 2024 Jesudass N et al.
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Background

Tele-practice promotes universal and equitable access to quality health services and emerged as an alternative to overcome physical barriers to intervention access in the 90s. There has been a steady increase in adoption since then, and during the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a surge in online modes of healthcare service delivery. Yet, tele-practice adoption and utilization in rural and remote areas are not spontaneous. Therefore, as a first step, prior to the implementation of a comprehensive tele-practice model, a baseline situational analysis was undertaken to assess the needs and readiness of parents of children with disabilities and different cadres of health care providers towards accepting tele-practice services in their settings. This paper describes the process of development of the conceptual framework that guided the baseline needs and readiness assessment (situational analysis).

Methods

The Bowen's feasibility framework served as the primary framework to evaluate the feasibility outcomes of the implementation. Therefore, this framework also guided the baseline situational analysis. For specificity of the framework to tele-practice, several telemedicine planning frameworks relevant for low- and middle-income countries were reviewed to identify and map suitable constructs and attributes to the Bowen’s constructs. A description of the framework selection process and a review of each of the selected telemedicine frameworks are provided.

Results

The constructs and attributes from this conceptual framework were used to develop the guides for focus group discussions (FGDs) and semi-structured interviews (SSIs). The guides were prepared separately for each stakeholder group.

Conclusions

The developed framework facilitated the assessment of needs and readiness suited to the context and among various stakeholders involved in the proposed implementation of the comprehensive model of tele-practice for childhood communication disorders in rural communities.

Plain Language Summary

This study describes the development of a conceptual framework for assessing the needs and readiness of parents of children with disabilities and different cadres of health care providers regarding their acceptance of tele-practice services in their settings. This baseline situational analysis is an initial step prior to the implementation of a comprehensive tele-practice model for the identification and rehabilitation of children with hearing and speech-language disorders within the public-health system of a rural district in Southern India.

Conceptual framework
needs
readiness
rural practice
tele-practice
focus group discussions
semi-structured interviews
qualitative studies
tele-practice
telemedicine
The Wellcome Trust DBT India AllianceIA/CPHI/19/1/504614 This work was supported by DBT/Wellcome Trust (IA/CPHI/19/1/504614) awarded to the corresponding author.
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Tele-practice promotes universal and equitable access to quality health services. Digital health can contribute to the sustainability and efficiency of health systems, allowing them to provide affordable, equitable, and high-quality care ( World Health Organization, 2021). Tele-practice emerged in health care sectors to overcome physical barriers to intervention access in the 90s ( Hodge et al., 2019; Law et al., 2021). There has been a steady increase in adoption since then, and during the COVID-19 pandemic there was a surge in online modes of healthcare service delivery ( Lamash et al., 2023; Law et al., 2021; Leung et al., 2023; Shahouzaie & Gholamiyan Arefi, 2022). Therefore, tele-practice is now considered a more mainstream model of health care provision.

Tele-practice has been used to address service delivery gaps in childhood disability ( Akulwar-Tajane & Bhatt, 2021; Camden et al., 2020; Ogourtsova et al., 2023) and more specifically to support rehabilitation of speech, language and hearing disorders ( Dimer et al., 2020; Ebrahimi et al., 2024; Eslami Jahromi et al., 2022). However, most of the tele-practice in audiology and speech language pathology seems to be implemented through funded research ( Ramkumar et al., 2023; Shankar et al., 2022) in high- income countries (HICs) and predominantly in urban settings. But the need is maximum for those living in rural communities who rely largely on public health services ( Roy, 2023; Tulimiero et al., 2021). This is truer for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Yet, tele-practice adoption and utilization in rural and remote areas has not been easy owing to reluctance of clinicians in rural areas and rural patients to adopt tele-practice ( Banbury et al., 2023).

The successful implementation of tele-practice services in the public and/or private sectors in rural areas requires careful planning through assessment of the needs of a population and their readiness for availing these services. This is best done using a well thought through conceptual framework that “defines the current state of knowledge (based on literature review), identifies gaps in the understanding of a phenomenon or problem, and provides the methodological basis for the research work” ( Varpio et al., 2020).

A funded project was initiated to assess the feasibility of implementing a comprehensive tele-practice model for the identification and rehabilitation of children with hearing and speech-language disorders in rural communities in Southern India. Therefore, as a first step, prior to implementation, a baseline situational analysis was undertaken to assess the needs and readiness of parents of children with disabilities and different cadres of health care providers towards accepting tele-practice services in their settings. The Bowen's feasibility framework ( Bowen et al., 2009) was selected as the primary framework to evaluate the feasibility outcomes of the implementation. Therefore, this framework also guided the baseline situational analysis. However, for specificity of the framework to tele-practice, several telemedicine planning frameworks were reviewed to identify and map suitable constructs and attributes to the Bowen’s constructs.

This paper describes this process of development and the finalized conceptual framework that guided the baseline needs and readiness assessment (situational analysis).

Methods

Ethical approval was obtained from Institutional Ethics Committee of Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (DU) on 25.11.2019 (IEC-NI/19/NOV/71/90).

The COnsolidated Criteria for REporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) Checklist ( Tong et al., 2007) was used to develop and report the domains of study team and reflexivity, and study design (checklist available as Extended data ( Ramkumar, 2024)).

The Bowen’s feasibility framework and several telemedicine frameworks applicable for LMICs settings were reviewed. A description of the framework selection process and a review of each of the selected telemedicine frameworks are provided below.

Review of literature and selection of telemedicine framework

Using search engines and keywords (telemedicine planning or tele-practice, planning, readiness assessment, needs, and framework), a literature search was conducted by the first and second authors (females, audiologist and speech language pathologists). Both of these authors are already trained in qualitative research methods. The literature search led to 22 articles on telemedicine planning. Three experts reviewed these 22 articles and excluded those that did not pertain to LMICs or irrelevant to rural context. Any discrepancies were resolved based on consensus. This resulted in a final set of seven articles that were considered for the mapping process. The summary of the selected telemedicine frameworks is provided in Table 1.

Table 1. Description of the selected telemedicine frameworks.

Author, Year and Country	Aim	Method	Constructs	
Kiberu et al., 2021, Uganda	Development of an evidence-based e-health readiness assessment framework	Literature review and questionnaire development	Political Readiness
Economic Readiness
Sociocultural Readiness
Technology Readiness
Environmental Readiness
Legal and Regulatory Readiness	
Addotey-Delove et al., 2020, South Africa	Development of a framework for patients’ perspectives on m-health adoption factors in the developing world	Structured literature search and review	Cost and Ownership
User Characteristics
Language and Literacy
Infrastructure
Collaboration and Funding
Governance,
system utility	
Kiberu et al., 2019, Uganda	Assessment of core, e-learning, clinical and technology readiness to integrate telemedicine at public health facilities in Uganda	Mixed methods using questionnaire and focus group discussion	Core Readiness
E-learning Readiness
Clinical Readiness
Technology readiness	
Mauco et al., 2018, Botswana	Critical analysis of e-health readiness assessment frameworks: suitability for application in developing countries	Literature review	Organisational readiness
Technological/ Infrastructural readiness
Healthcare provider readiness
Engagement readiness
Societal readiness
Core readiness
Government readiness
Public/ Patient readiness	
AlDossary et al., 2017, Australia	Development of a planning framework for telemedicine services based on needs assessment	Mixed methods using questionnaire, focus groups and geographic information analysis	Availability and expressed needs,
Accessibility,
Perception and affordability	
Kgasi & Kalema, 2014, South Africa	Development of framework for e-health readiness assessment	Questionnaire	Core Readiness,
Structural Readiness,
Effort Expectance
Performance, Expectance
Engagement Readiness
Societal Readiness	
Jennett et al., 2003, Canada	Development of readiness model for telehealth	Key informant interviews, awareness sessions, focus groups, and face-to-face interviews	Core readiness
Engagement readiness Structural readiness
Non-readiness	

Three experts with experience in tele-practice reviewed the constructs of the finalized seven articles on telemedicine planning. The identified concerns were subsequently addressed, and the conceptual framework was finalised.

Mapping the attributes of telemedicine framework to the Bowen’s feasibility framework

The primary framework to study feasibility outcomes was the Bowen's feasibility framework ( Bowen et al., 2009) which includes the constructs of acceptability, demand, implementation, practicability, adaptation, integration, expansion, and limited efficacy. While the construct of demand was chosen to understand the demands or needs of tele-practice, the constructs of acceptability, integration, and practicality were chosen to understand the readiness of tele-practice. The study team visited the research locations to gain knowledge about the current health services, systems, infrastructure available and various cadres of health care providers in these communities.

The constructs were reviewed and included in an iterative manner guided and influenced by the understanding of the research locations. Using the constructs identified following our telemedicine frameworks literature review, three experts mapped these to the constructs of Bowens feasibility framework to explore the needs and readiness for tele-practice in rural areas for childhood communication disorders ( Table 2). All these attributes were selected based on the study's research objectives.

Table 2. A conceptual framework to study the needs and readiness for tele-practice in rural areas for childhood communication disorders.

S.No.	Constructs included
from Bowen's feasibility
framework	Constructs included from reviewed
Telemedicine frameworks	Attributes that exemplifies the constructs
specific to the research objectives	
1	Demand/Need	Availability, accessibility, expressed needs	Availability of diagnostic and rehabilitation facilities	
Accessibility of diagnostic and rehabilitation facilities	
Barriers and challenges in seeking health care
(transport, timing, cost)	
Satisfaction with the quality of health care	
2	Acceptability	Acceptance of service	Use of communication links between stakeholders	
Participation	
Attitudes of stakeholders	
Customs and beliefs with respect to disabilities or
health care services	
Comfort with technologies	Comfort with the use of mobile phone-based
screening	
Comfort with hearing and speech-language
screening by grass root workers	
3	Integration	Organizational readiness	Policy will	
Willingness to adapt health systems	
Infrastructure availability/capacity	
Clinical skills	Training needs	
Learning readiness	
Time	Time management by providers	
Perceived fit		
4	Practicality	Technical aspects	Training needs, learning readiness	
Economic	Caregivers and healthcare providers perspectives	
Affordability	Caregivers’ perspectives	
Healthcare provider perspectives	
Technical	

Results

This conceptual framework was used to obtain the perspectives of various stakeholders involved in the study to assess their needs and readiness towards accepting tele-practice services in their settings. The stakeholders were health care providers (HCPs) and parents in two rural districts in the state of Tamil Nadu with similar contexts (Ariyalur and Perambalur). The HCPs included the District Differently Abled Welfare (DDAW) officers, multi-purpose rehabilitation therapist, Audiologist and speech-language pathologists (ASLPs) working in public-sector services, special educators in early intervention centres (EICs), Early Intervention Center (EIC) – In-charge, SSA Special educators, government pre-school teachers ( anganwadi workers) and Village Health Nurses (VHNs). Parents of children with disabilities were also included.

The conceptual framework were used to develop the guides for focus group discussions (FGDs) and semi structured interviews (SSIs) (available as Extended data ( Ramkumar, 2024)). The guides were prepared separately for each stakeholder group. We followed the five phases for the development of the SSI guide that were provided by Kallio et al. (2016): identifying the prerequisites for using semi-structured interviews; retrieving and applying prior knowledge; formulating the preliminary semi-structured interview guide; pilot testing the guide; and presenting the complete guide. We followed the same five phases for the development of the FGD guide as well.

The guides were further enhanced and improved by integrating the insights obtained from each focus group discussion and interview, thereby enabling a deeper understanding. Prior to data collection, two specialists with expertise in qualitative research and tele-practice conducted a further review of the guides to ensure that they were concise, easy to comprehend, and pertinent to the research objectives. The main questions were followed by probe questions to ensure that the perspectives obtained were pertinent to the research question. Two experts in the field validated the guides, and based on their suggestions, modifications were made to the guides. The guide was then tailored to the needs of each stakeholder group. Prior to the data collection, a pilot test was conducted with the guide.

Interviews with a semi-structured method were selected to collect individual responses to the research question. If any stakeholder group had less than five members, an SSIs was conducted with the participant's consent. The guides were used to understand perceptions of the health care providers on their training needs, infrastructure availability, time management between administrative and clinical work and challenges in providing consistent diagnostic and rehabilitation services will be explored. Their perceptions of barriers and facilitators to tele-practice implementation and their readiness for adopting it were explored. More specifically, SSI guides were developed for the DDAW officers, multi-purpose rehabilitation therapist ASLPs, special educators and EIC incharges, FGDs were carried out with SSA Special educators, anganwadi workers and VHNs as well as with parents of children with disabilities. A separate guide was developed to understand caregiver perceptions regarding the availability and accessibility of diagnostic and rehabilitation facilities, barriers and challenges encountered in seeking care, and satisfaction with quality of care, including cost-related issues and their readiness to accept tele-practice.

Conclusion

A context and content specific needs and readiness framework was developed to guide the implementation of tele-practice for childhood communication disorders in rural communities.

Limitations

The conceptual framework was only implemented within a limited geographic area, specifically confined to a few districts in the southern region. It will be worthwhile to apply this framework to other regions in India and other low- and middle- income countries.

Ethics and consent

Ethical approval was obtained from Institutional Ethics Committee of Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (DU) on 25.11.2019 (IEC-NI/19/NOV/71/90). The informed consent forms were signed by participants prior to the data collection.

Data availability

Underlying data

The data for this article consists of bibliographic references, which are included in the References section, and are outlined in Table 1 and Table 2.

Extended data

Open Science Framework: Method Manuscript. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/4P3M2 ( Ramkumar, 2024).

This project contains the following extended data:

- COREQ checklist

- Guides for FGD and SSI developed using the conceptual framework for health care providers

- Guides for FGD and SSI developed using the conceptual framework for parents

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).

10.21956/wellcomeopenres.23210.r88014
Reviewer response for version 1
Bridgman Kate 1Referee
1 La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
6 9 2024 Copyright: © 2024 Bridgman K
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Version 1recommendationapprove-with-reservations
Thank you for the opportunity to review this article titled ‘Development of a conceptual framework to understand the stakeholder’s perspectives on needs and readiness or rural tele-practice for childhood communication disorders’. The authors are to be commended for the detail of this study – first conducting a review to select suitable frameworks to then inform focus group interviews.

The following comments are offered to refine specific details to increase clarity for a first-time reader: Terminology – the population is referred to differently throughout the manuscript, for e.g. childhood communication disorders (titled), children with disabilities (abstract), children with hearing and speech-language disorders (plain English summary and introduction). For clarity, it would be best to use title ‘childhood communication disorders’ throughout.

History of telepractice – the authors reports that telepractice emerged in the 90s, however use and development of telepractice/telehealth predates the 1990s (for e.g. The Evolution of Telehealth: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going? - The Role of Telehealth in an Evolving Health Care Environment - NCBI Bookshelf (nih.gov))

References  - introduction paragraph 3 – a reference would strengthen the statement ‘ The successful implementation of tele-practice services in the public and/or private sectors in rural areas requires careful planning through assessment of the needs of a population and their readiness for availing these services.’

Details of search –  are the exact search terms listed? Typically the terms including truncations, wildcards and Boolean operators are listed, as are the exact databases that are used.

Constructs – Table 1 is well presented and represents a summary of each framework, an additional column explaining the construct of definition may help readers with new concepts – for e.g. what is meant by ‘technology readiness’ and ‘E-learning readiness’, and how might these differ? What is meant by, or an example of ‘effort expectance’?. This could also be included for Table 2 – for e.g. what is meant by ‘policy will’?

Is the rationale for developing the new method (or application) clearly explained?

Yes

Is the description of the method technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions about the method and its performance adequately supported by the findings presented in the article?

Yes

If any results are presented, are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Partly

Are sufficient details provided to allow replication of the method development and its use by others?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

Telehealth, implementation science.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

10.21956/wellcomeopenres.23210.r88016
Reviewer response for version 1
Sanghavi Tanvi 1Referee
1 All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mysore, India
29 8 2024 Copyright: © 2024 Sanghavi T
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Version 1recommendationapprove
The idea of the article is relevant and meaningful although the title can be simplified and kept short. The experience of audiologists and speech language pathologists is also worth mentioning. Please mention if they have taken any training for providing teletherapy series. As future research, the authors can develop a model to make teletherapy a viable option and find out the barriers (if any) for opting the tele mode.

Is the rationale for developing the new method (or application) clearly explained?

Yes

Is the description of the method technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions about the method and its performance adequately supported by the findings presented in the article?

Yes

If any results are presented, are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

No source data required

Are sufficient details provided to allow replication of the method development and its use by others?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Telepractice, autism, speech language pathology, dysphagia

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

10.21956/wellcomeopenres.23210.r92846
Reviewer response for version 1
Wickenden Mary 1Referee
1 Institute of Development Studies, Brighton, England, UK
14 8 2024 Copyright: © 2024 Wickenden M
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Version 1recommendationapprove
Thanks for the opportunity to review this interesting piece which presents the development of a  conceptual framework for a needs assessment for a new tele-practice to provide speech and language therapy for children with communication impairments in rural South India. It draws on a number of previously produced frameworks to develop one suitable for this purpose.

It is generally well written, clear, succinct and easy to follow.  It is a systematic description of the process.

There is very little need for change, but I have listed a few places where the expression could be clearer or more grammatical, see below:

In results section: End of 1st para- 'Parents of children with disabilities were also included'  This makes them sound like an afterthought, whereas surely they are probably the most important group of respondents?  Adjust the wording maybe?.

2nd para- The conceptual framework was used.

‘Interviews with a semi-structured method’  - adjust to >  'Interviews using a semi-structured'.

'an SSIs was conducted', adjust to > 'an interview was conducted'.

'The guides were used to understand perceptions of the health care providers on their training needs, infrastructure availability, time management between administrative and clinical work and challenges in providing consistent diagnostic and rehabilitation services will be explored'. Need to adjust grammar of these sentences.

'their readiness for adopting it were explored' adjust to > readiness to adopt it.

Last few sentences of last paragraph in Results are slightly confusingly worded.  You’ve already said that you specifically designed the topic guide for each group, including parents and then you mention caregivers. Need to adjust this paragraph for consistency.  However, giving the example of the kinds of things you planned to ask parents/caregivers is good though, so retain this in your rephrase.

Additionally - I would have been interested in some mention of the possibility of asking children themselves what they would think about a tele therapy approach. You clearly weren't thinking of doing that but the possibility deserves a mention!

Is the rationale for developing the new method (or application) clearly explained?

Yes

Is the description of the method technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions about the method and its performance adequately supported by the findings presented in the article?

Yes

If any results are presented, are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Partly

Are sufficient details provided to allow replication of the method development and its use by others?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Speech and language therapist and anthropologist, with research interests in disability in the Global South. Particularly  developing and using qualitative, participatory , disability inclusive projects, asking children and families about their experiences and perspectives. Working with disabled children and adults as peer researchers and active participants. Geographical foci in India, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and also in East Africa.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
==== Refs
Addotey-Delove MNA Scott RE Mars M : Patients perspective of m-health adoption factors in the developing world. Development of a proposed framework. 2020. 10.21203/rs.2.17194/v2
Akulwar-Tajane I Bhatt GD : Telerehabilitation: an alternative service delivery model for pediatric neurorehabilitation services at a tertiary care center in India. Int J Phys Med Rehabil. 2021;9 (S4 ). Reference Source
AlDossary S Martin-Khan MG Bradford NK : The development of a telemedicine planning framework based on needs assessment. J Med Syst. 2017;41 (5 ): 74. 10.1007/s10916-017-0709-4 28321589
Banbury A Smith AC Mehrotra A : A comparison study between metropolitan and rural hospital-based telehealth activity to inform adoption and expansion. J Telemed Telecare. 2023;29 (7 ):540–551. 10.1177/1357633X21998201 33765879
Bowen DJ Kreuter M Spring B : How we design feasibility studies. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36 (5 ):452–457. 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.02.002 19362699
Camden C Pratte G Fallon F : Diversity of practices in telerehabilitation for children with disabilities and effective intervention characteristics: results from a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42 (24 ):3424–3436. 10.1080/09638288.2019.1595750 30978110
Dimer NA Canto-Soares ND Santos-Teixeira LD : The COVID-19 pandemic and the implementation of telehealth in speech-language and hearing therapy for patients at home: an experience report. Codas. Sociedade Brasileira de Fonoaudiologia,2020;32 (3 ): e20200144. 10.1590/2317-1782/20192020144 32578694
Ebrahimi S Marzaleh MA Zakerabbasali S : Comparing the clinical effectiveness of telerehabilitation with traditional speech and language rehabilitation in children with hearing disabilities: a systematic review. Telemed J E Health. 2024;30 (2 ):307–320. 10.1089/tmj.2023.0258 37566531
Eslami Jahromi M Ahmadian L Bahaadinbeigy K : The effect of tele-speech therapy on treatment of stuttering. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022;17 (1 ):34–39. 10.1080/17483107.2020.1754475 32299263
Hodge MA Sutherland R Jeng K : Agreement between telehealth and face-to-face assessment of intellectual ability in children with specific learning disorder. J Telemed Telecare. 2019;25 (7 ):431–437. 10.1177/1357633X18776095 29874968
Jennett P Bates J Healy T : A readiness model for telehealth is it possible to pre-determine how prepared communities are to implement telehealth? Stud Health Technol Inform. 2003;97 :51–55. 10.3233/978-1-60750-941-7-51 15537230
Kallio H Pietilä AM Johnson M : Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. J Adv Nurs.Blackwell Publishing Ltd,2016;72 (12 ):2954–2965. 10.1111/jan.13031 27221824
Kgasi MR Kalema BM : Assessment E-health Readiness for Rural South African Areas. Journal of Industrial and Intelligent Information. 2014;2 (2 ):131–135. Reference Source
Kiberu VM Mars M Scott RE : Development of an evidence-based e-health readiness assessment framework for Uganda. Health Inf Manag. 2021;50 (3 ):140–148. 10.1177/1833358319839253 31010314
Kiberu VM Scott RE Mars M : Assessing core, e-learning, clinical and technology readiness to integrate telemedicine at public health facilities in Uganda: a health facility - Based survey. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19 (1 ): 266. 10.1186/s12913-019-4057-6 31035976
Lamash L Little L Hen-Herbst L : Telehealth interventions to promote health and behavior-related outcomes in adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder. J Autism Dev Disord. 2023;53 (1 ):405–423. 10.1007/s10803-022-05440-2 35061162
Law J Dornstauder M Charlton J : Tele-practice for children and young people with communication disabilities: Employing the COM-B model to review the intervention literature and inform guidance for practitioners. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021;56 (2 ):415–434. 10.1111/1460-6984.12592 33522068
Leung LB Yoo C Chu K : Rates of primary care and integrated mental health telemedicine visits between rural and urban veterans affairs beneficiaries before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6 (3 ): e231864. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1864 36881410
Mauco KL Scott RE Mars M : Critical analysis of e-health readiness assessment frameworks: suitability for application in developing countries. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;24 (2 ):110–117. 10.1177/1357633X16686548 28008790
Ogourtsova T Boychuck Z O’Donnell M : Telerehabilitation for children and youth with developmental disabilities and their families: a systematic review. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2023;43 (2 ):129–175. 10.1080/01942638.2022.2106468 36042567
Ramkumar V : Method Manuscript. OSF. [Dataset].2024. 10.17605/OSF.IO/4P3M2
Ramkumar V Shankar V Kumar S : Implementation factors influencing the sustained provision of tele-audiology services: insights from a combined methodology of scoping review and qualitative Semistructured Interviews. BMJ open. 2023;13 (10 ): e075430. 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075430 37875289
Roy S : Health care seeking practices and barriers to health care seeking for suspected pneumonia in children aged less than five years in tribal and non-tribal rural areas of Pune district, India. 2023. Reference Source
Shahouzaie N Gholamiyan Arefi M : Telehealth in speech and language therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022;19 (3 ):761–768. 10.1080/17483107.2022.2122605 36129435
Shankar V Ramkumar V Kumar S : Understanding the implementation of telepractice in speech and language services using a mixed-methods approach [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. Wellcome Open Res. 2022;7 :46. 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17622.2 36158869
Tong A Sainsbury P Craig J : Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19 (6 ):349–357. 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042 17872937
Tulimiero M Garcia M Rodriguez M : Overcoming barriers to health care access in rural Latino communities: an innovative model in the eastern Coachella Valley. J Rural Health. 2021;37 (3 ):635–644. 10.1111/jrh.12483 32603004
Varpio L Paradis E Uijtdehaage S : The distinctions between theory, theoretical framework, and conceptual framework. Acad Med./italic> . Lippincott Williams and Wilkins,2020;95 (7 ):989–994. 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003075 31725464
World Health Organization: Global strategy on digital health 2020-2025. 2021. Reference Source
