
==== Front
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol
JRAT
JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
2369-2529
JMIR Publications Toronto, Canada

v9i4e40094
36473024
10.2196/40094
Original Paper
Original Paper
A Telerehabilitation Program for Maintaining Functional Capacity in Patients With Chronic Lung Diseases During a Period of COVID-19 Social Isolation: Quasi-Experimental Retrospective Study
Leung Tiffany
Sheehy Lisa
George Immanuel Victor
Patwary Muhammad Mainuddin
Miozzo Aline Paula PhD 1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6529-4060

Camponogara Righi Natiele MSc 1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7621-7204

Yumi Shizukuishi Maria Luiza BSc, PT 1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0106-2110

Marques Ferreira Aguilar Hérica BSc, PT 1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1896-7052

Florian Juliessa PhD 2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9644-8875

da Costa Machado Scheila BSc, PT 2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1407-900X

Schardong Jociane PhD 2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3635-8541

Della Méa Plentz Rodrigo PhD https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2662-8192
1Physiotherapy Department Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre Rua Sarmento Leite, 245 Porto Alegre, 90050-170 Brazil 55 51991131651 rodrigop@ufcspa.edu.br

1 Physiotherapy Department Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre Porto Alegre Brazil
2 Physiotherapy Department Irmandade Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre Porto Alegre Brazil
Corresponding Author: Rodrigo Della Méa Plentz rodrigop@ufcspa.edu.br
Oct-Dec 2022
22 12 2022
9 4 e400946 6 2022
9 9 2022
28 9 2022
12 10 2022
©Aline Paula Miozzo, Natiele Camponogara Righi, Maria Luiza Yumi Shizukuishi, Hérica Marques Ferreira Aguilar, Juliessa Florian, Scheila da Costa Machado, Jociane Schardong, Rodrigo Della Méa Plentz. Originally published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology (https://rehab.jmir.org), 22.12.2022.
2022
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://rehab.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

Background

Pulmonary diseases represent a great cause of disability and mortality in the world, and given the progression of these pathologies, pulmonary rehabilitation programs have proven to be effective for people with chronic respiratory diseases. During the COVID-19 pandemic, telerehabilitation has become an alternative for patients with such diseases.

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes (ie, functional capacity and quality of life) of telerehabilitation to those of usual care among patients who previously participated in face-to-face pulmonary rehabilitation programs.

Methods

We conducted a quasi-experimental retrospective study from April 2020 to August 2021. A total of 32 patients with chronic lung diseases were included and divided into the control and intervention groups. The intervention group performed telerehabilitation synchronously twice per week and was supervised by a physical therapist during breathing, strengthening, and aerobic exercises. Changes in the degree of dyspnea and leg discomfort were assessed based on changes in Borg scale scores. The control group did not perform any activities during the period of social isolation. Functional capacity was assessed with the 6-minute walk test, and quality of life was assessed with the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey.

Results

The telerehabilitation group’s mean 6-minute walk distance decreased by 39 m, while that of the control group decreased by 120 m. There was a difference of 81 m between the groups’ mean 6-minute walk distances (P=.02). In relation to the quality of life, telerehabilitation was shown to improve the following two domains: social functioning and mental health.

Conclusions

Telerehabilitation programs for patients with chronic lung diseases can ease the deleterious effects of disease progression, be used to maintain functional capacity, and improve aspects of quality of life.

telerehabilitation
lung diseases
social isolation
COVID-19
pulmonary rehabilitation
pulmonary
rehabilitation
quality of life
chronic disease
mental health
social functioning
patient outcome
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

In 2019, the whole world was impacted by the onset of a new disease—COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 infection, in the most severe cases, leads to acute respiratory syndrome. Further, it has reached high incidence rates and is associated with mortality, resulting in a pandemic state [1]. The impact of the disease has exceeded expectations with regard to mortality, complications, and hospital costs, leading to significant socioeconomic, political, and psychosocial impacts. Many services that were considered nonessential had their activities stopped, and people were encouraged to seek alternatives to maintain their routines within their own homes or seek other options so that patients with pre-existing diseases could continue to be assisted, thereby avoiding detriments to physical well-being and lung capacity and reducing hospital admissions and mortality rates [2].

Lung diseases, such as the more prevalent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and interstitial lung disease, represent a great worldwide cause of disability and mortality with a growing burden [3-5]. These progressive pathologies can cause dyspnea; fatigue; and reductions in physical activity, exercise tolerance, muscle strength, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) [6-8]. These may result in immobility, dependency on help from others, and social isolation [4,7].

In this context, given the progression of these pathologies, pulmonary rehabilitation programs (PRPs) are interventions that have proven to be effective for people with chronic respiratory diseases [8-10]. Among the main benefits of PRPs, the improvements in exercise capacity, HRQOL, and survival; the reductions in the intensity of dyspnea, the number of hospitalizations, and the length of hospital stays; and decreased anxiety and depression can be highlighted [11].

Such benefits persist for 8 to 12 weeks among patients with chronic respiratory diseases who participate in face-to-face PRPs [12]. However, over the past 2 years, billions of people have continued to maintain social distancing as a measure for containing the spread of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Social isolation leads to loneliness and chronic boredom, which can have negative effects on the physical and mental well-being of patients with chronic respiratory diseases [2]. Thus, telerehabilitation may offer an alternative for ensuring patients’ participation in PRPs [12]. The term telerehabilitation has been used to describe the delivery of rehabilitation by using telecommunication technology [13].

Recent studies show that telerehabilitation for patients with chronic lung diseases, when compared to face-to-face PRPs, allows for the maintenance of important outcomes, such as functional capacity, which is assessed with the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) [8,14-17]. Furthermore, it is safe [8,18], with no increase in the rate of adverse events [12], and it has good patient compliance [14]. Telerehabilitation has also been able to reduce disease exacerbations as well as the mean number and duration of hospitalizations [16,19]. However, there are still no studies on conducting telerehabilitation with these patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Since 2010, the World Health Organization has encouraged the use of telemedicine to maximize health services while respecting cultural, demographic, and gender differences [20]. In the field of physiotherapy, World Physiotherapy and the International Network of Physical Therapy Regulatory Authorities (INPTRA) have highlighted that the use of modern technologies and practices through digital means creates an excellent opportunity for physiotherapists to engage with broad audiences to improve effects and impacts, resulting in the provision of services, resources, and information in an easier and faster way [21]. However, in Brazil, the law that defends the use of telemedicine was enacted [22] only because of the pandemic, and the Federal Council of Physiotherapy regulated the permission of non–face-to-face services in 2020. The teleconsultation and telemonitoring modalities have thus become recent practices in physiotherapy [23]. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effects of telerehabilitation and usual care on the functional capacity and quality of life of patients with chronic lung diseases who were previous participants of face-to-face PRPs, in the context of the social isolation imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

This quasi-experimental retrospective study was carried out at the Pulmonary Rehabilitation Service of the Pavilhão Pereira Filho at Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre (ISCMPA), through the institutional portal and on site, from April 2020 to August 2021.

Ethics Approval

This study was approved by the Ethics Committees in Human Research of ISCMPA and was registered under approval number 04453412.7.0000.5335. All participants signed the informed consent form.

Study Sample

The telerehabilitation program was structured based on the need to retain the content of its face-to-face form as much as possible during social isolation. The sample was for convenience and included patients who were enrolled in and were undergoing pulmonary rehabilitation at the Pulmonary Rehabilitation Service of the Pavilhão Pereira Filho at ISCMPA before the period of social isolation. Patients were recruited from July 2020 to July 2021. The inclusion criteria were patients diagnosed with COPD, interstitial lung disease, bronchiectasis, or pulmonary emphysema; patients of both sexes; patients aged between 18 and 80 years; and patients on optimized drug therapy. The exclusion criteria were patients who were discontinued from the program; patients undergoing lung transplantation; patients who were hospitalized, resulting in the interruption of the home program; and failure to sign the informed consent form. A total of 32 patients were included—14 in the control group and 18 in the telerehabilitation group.

The physical training component of the face-to-face PRP was administered by 2 physical therapists, with sessions conducted 3 times per week. During this physical training, patients performed breathing exercises (respiratory cycle) as a warm-up, followed by arm and leg exercises for muscle strengthening, which involved an initial load of 30% of the 1-repetition maximum testing load and 1 set of 10 repetitions per exercise. Aerobic exercises were also performed on a treadmill, beginning at 70% of the patients’ speed on the 6MWT, with progression. During the PRP, all patients received continuous oxygen therapy in accordance with their medical prescriptions, and they were constantly monitored via pulse oximetry to maintain an oxygen saturation of ≥92%. The modified Borg scale was used for measuring the degree of dyspnea and leg discomfort [24]. This scale is graded from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no feeling of shortness of breath or discomfort, and 10 indicates the maximum feeling of shortness of breath or discomfort. The Borg scale seems to be an affordable, practical, and valid tool for monitoring and prescribing exercise intensity, independent of sex, age, exercise modality, and physical activity level [25,26]. Assessments of functional capacity and quality of life were collected every 36 sessions [24].

In March 2020, the face-to-face form of the program had to be closed due to the social isolation measures that were implemented to combat the advance of COVID-19. All patients were invited to follow up remotely, and those who accepted the invitation entered the telerehabilitation program.

Telerehabilitation Program

Educational materials containing photos and explanations for performing exercises at home were made available at the beginning of social isolation, and phone calls were also made once per week. Subsequently, the institution developed a connection portal via the institutional website, so that the consultations could take place remotely, and physical therapists, residents, and physical therapy interns began to monitor 26 patients via the internet. The telerehabilitation group held 2 synchronous sessions per week and was monitored by physiotherapists through the institutional portal. These physiotherapists also provided guidance on how to perform the exercises once per day every day. Patients performed breathing exercises (deep inspiration and expiration with a labial fret) during sessions, and resistance exercises for the upper and lower limbs, metabolic exercises, and aerobic exercises (ie, walking, treadmill exercises, or ergometric bicycle exercises) were performed according to patients’ availability. Patients were encouraged to buy weights for performing strength exercises, and if this was not possible, the rehabilitation service made the materials available by loaning them to patients. Additionally, pulse oximeters were used to monitor the patients during the exercises. Patients were monitored for heart rate and peripheral oxygen saturation by using a pulse oximeter, and the modified Borg scale was used for measuring the degree of dyspnea and leg discomfort [25,26]. This scale was used due to the familiarity that patients had with its use during the face-to-face PRP. Patients in the control group did not perform any activities during the period of social isolation and therefore did not participate in this phase of the research.

In July 2021, the transition from face-to-face rehabilitation to its hybrid form took place, in which the patients performed a face-to-face session every other week, intercalating with a web-based session. Functional capacity and quality of life assessments were performed at the times when patients returned to the face-to-face portions of the PRP.

Outcomes

Functional capacity was the primary outcome and was assessed through the 6MWT, in accordance with the recommendations of the American Thoracic Society [27]. The patients made their way through a 30-m corridor (delimited by cones) for 6 minutes, and they were encouraged by the evaluator every minute. Data on heart rate, blood pressure, and effort perception (based on the Borg scale) were obtained before and after the test. In order to evaluate the impact on quality of life and health maintenance, the patients were invited to fill out a questionnaire. The Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) [28] was used to evaluate HRQOL. Through this questionnaire, the following eight domains of HRQOL were assessed: physical functioning, physical role, physical pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, emotional role, and mental health [28].

The last assessment in the face-to-face form of the PRP was considered the initial assessment for this study. The final assessment was performed when patients in both groups returned to the face-to-face portion of the PRP. In addition, data, such as the need for continuous oxygen use only during exercise, were collected.

Statistical Analysis

For the data analysis, SPSS software version 23.0 (IBM Corp) was used. Data normality was verified by using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Continuous data were presented as means and SDs, and categorical data were described as frequencies and percentages. Comparisons were performed by using a t test or Mann-Whitney test. The adopted significance level was 5%.

Results

A total of 32 patients were included in the sample—14 in the control group and 18 in the telerehabilitation group. Of note, 63% (20/32) of participants were female, and the control group was older and had higher BMIs when compared to the telerehabilitation group. With regard to lung function, the groups were homogeneous, and the most prevalent pathologies were pulmonary fibrosis, pulmonary emphysema, and COPD. A patient flowchart is shown in Figure 1, and clinical characteristics are presented in Table 1.

In relation to the main outcome, prior to the pandemic, the control group walked more than the telerehabilitation group in the 6MWT (mean 465, SD 84 m vs mean 388, SD 121 m). After about 1.5 years of isolation, the control group walked a mean of 344 (SD 92) m, and the telerehabilitation group walked a mean of 348 (SD 146) m. It can be noted that the control group’s mean 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) decreased by 120 m, which represents 4 fewer laps in the 6MWT, and the telerehabilitation group’s mean 6MWD decreased by only 39 m, which represents 1 fewer lap in the test. There was a difference of 81 m between the groups’ mean 6MWDs (P=.02; Figure 2).

As for HRQOL, of the 8 SF-36 domains, 6 did not show a significant difference in results (physical functioning: P=.95; physical role: P=.13; physical pain: P=.24; general health: P=.92; vitality: P=.34; emotional role: P=.76). However, for important outcomes, such as social functioning and mental health, telerehabilitation showed a beneficial effect (P=.03 and P=.02, respectively; Table 2).

The loss of functional capacity among patients with chronic lung diseases due to the pause in rehabilitation activities imposed by COVID-19 social isolation was also observed through a qualitative analysis of data regarding the use of continuous oxygen only during exercise. Of the 18 patients in the telerehabilitation group, only 8 used continuous oxygen to perform the exercises, and after the isolation period, all patients needed continuous oxygen for these activities. In the control group, before isolation, no patients used continuous oxygen to perform the exercises, and after the isolation period, 7 patients started to use it. That is, there was about a 50% increase in the need to use continuous oxygen to perform exercises after the period of social isolation in both groups.

Figure 1 Patient flowchart.

Table 1 Clinical characteristics.

Characteristics	Control group (n=14)	Telerehabilitation group (n=18)	P valuea	
Sex (male), n	4	8	N/Ab	
Age (years), mean (SD)	73.4 (7.4)	54.5 (8.7)	<.001	
BMI (kg/m2), mean (SD)	28 (3.9)	23.9 (3.6)	.004	
Pulmonary function (control group: n=12; telerehabilitation group: n=17), mean (SD)	

	FEV1c (L)	1.2 (0.5)	1.1 (0.7)	.25	

	FVCd (L)	2.1 (0.5)	1.7 (0.7)	.09	

	FEV1 to FVC ratio	54.9 (16.6)	57.5 (21.1)	.73	
Baseline disease, n (%)	

	Pulmonary fibrosis	2 (14)	5 (28)	N/A	

	Bronchiectasis	3 (21)	2 (11)	N/A	

	Pulmonary emphysema	2 (14)	4 (22)	N/A	

	Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease	7 (50)	6 (33)	N/A	

	Pulmonary arterial hypertension	0 (0)	1 (6)	N/A	
Comorbidities, n (%)	

	Systemic arterial hypertension	6 (43)	5 (28)	N/A	

	Atrial fibrillation	1 (7)	1 (6)	N/A	

	Diabetes	3 (21)	2 (11)	N/A	

	Dyslipidemia	2 (14)	0 (0)	N/A	

	Osteoporosis	1 (7)	1 (6)	N/A	

	Depression	1 (7)	1 (6)	N/A	

	Fibromyalgia	2 (14)	0 (0)	N/A	

	Hypothyroidism	2 (14)	2 (11)	N/A	

	Pulmonary arterial hypertension	0 (0)	2 (11)	N/A	

	Stroke	0 (0)	1 (6)	N/A	
aDerived from a t test or Mann-Whitney test.

bN/A: not applicable.

cFEV1: forced expired volume in the first second.

dFVC: forced vital capacity.

Figure 2 Participants' 6-minute walk test distances. *P=.02.

Table 2 Quality of life.

SF-36a domains	Control group scores	Telerehabilitation group scores	P valueb	

	Before isolation, mean (SD)	After isolation, mean (SD)	Mean ∆	Before isolation, mean (SD)	After isolation, mean (SD)	Mean ∆	
	
Physical functioning	38 (26)	32 (28)	−6	20 (18)	15 (16)	−5	.95	
Physical role	45 (48)	32 (36)	−13	25 (36)	28 (35)	3	.13	
Physical pain	53 (17)	50 (20)	−4	46 (12)	49 (13)	3	.24	
General health	49 (22)	44 (23)	−5	38 (24)	33 (22)	−5	.92	
Vitality	56 (23)	45 (17)	−10	49 (17)	44 (15)	−6	.34	
Social functioning	73 (30)	62 (27)	−12	57 (27)	74 (21)	17	.03c	
Emotional role	62 (43)	55 (43)	−7	63 (46)	63 (46)	0	.76	
Mental health	75 (18)	64 (20)	−11	72 (14)	74 (14)	2	.02c	
aSF-36: 36-item Short Form Health Survey.

bDerived from a t test or Mann-Whitney test.

cSignificant at the P<.05 level.

Discussion

Principal Findings

This study proposed to measure the effects of a telerehabilitation program in patients with chronic lung diseases and compare these effects to those of usual care after PRP interruption due to the social isolation imposed by COVID-19. The main findings of this study were the maintenance of functional capacity through telerehabilitation and the improvement in quality of life domains, such as social functioning and mental health. Furthermore, there was an increase in the need to use continuous oxygen during exercise in 44% (8/18) and 50% (7/14) of patients in the telerehabilitation and control groups, respectively.

As chronic lung diseases advance, exertional breathlessness is triggered by simple activities of daily life and is the strongest determinant of functional capacity and HRQOL [13,14]. The importance of showing positive results in the 6MWT is associated with the fact that, in patients with chronic lung diseases, a lower 6MWD is strongly and independently associated with an increased mortality rate and is a better predictor of death at 6 months than forced vital capacity [29-31]. Our study revealed that telerehabilitation resulted in the maintenance of the 6MWDs obtained in the 6MWT, while the control group’s 6MWDs decreased by 4 laps in this test.

Other recent studies that compared telerehabilitation to usual care also found this same maintenance of functional capacity in patients with COPD [16] and in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) [14]. As in our study, Cerdán-de-Las-Heras et al [14] also found a significant reduction in the distances covered in the 6MWT by the control group. When compared to face-to-face rehabilitation, this same maintenance was found in patients with COPD [17,18,32].

In addition to this important benefit, some studies have shown that telerehabilitation can be as effective as face-to-face rehabilitation in reducing the number of exacerbations in patients with chronic lung diseases, as well as reducing the mean duration and number of hospitalizations [16,19]. Telerehabilitation has been shown to be safe and well tolerated among patients with chronic lung diseases, in addition to not being related to an increase in the rate of adverse events [8,12,14,18] and being greatly cost-effective [33].

An important finding of our study is the improvement of the social functioning and mental health components of the SF-36. Corroborating our study, Galdiz et al [15] also found differences in the mental health component when comparing telerehabilitation with face-to-face rehabilitation. Magaluti et al [12] also showed positive results for HRQOL. Cerdán-de-Las-Heras et al [14], on the other hand, did not demonstrate differences in the HRQOL of patients with IPF when comparing telerehabilitation with usual care [14].

It is important to highlight that social isolation leads to loneliness and boredom [2], which result in a reduction in physical activity levels and the worsening of health and general condition [34]. In addition, because of the social isolation imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a worsening in life habits, such as increases in the consumption of alcohol and other substances, which directly correlate with mental health factors [35]. Mental health and general well-being have been severely affected by COVID-19 [36]. In March 2020, 25% of the Canadian population reported poor to regular mental health, whereas only 8% reported this degree of mental health in 2018 [37]. Similar results were found in other countries, such as the United Kingdom, Italy, and Spain [38]. In China, half of the adult population experienced symptoms of anxiety and depression [39]. Thus, there is a need for programs that intervene in the quality of life and are related to the mental health and well-being of the population. These programs can be delivered primarily through telecommunication during periods of isolation, such as those that are imposed due to health reasons [40].

Given the abovementioned issues, it is understood that chronic lung diseases result in the progression of a cycle of physical inactivity, low exercise tolerance, increased dyspnea, and the worsening of HRQOL [14]. Additionally, social isolation increases loneliness and contributes to these adverse effects [2], which can explain the increased need for continuous oxygen use during exercise that was found in our study. With regard to the supply of oxygen in patients with chronic lung diseases, a study showed that providing oxygen through a cylinder for home use for 15 days to patients with IPF showed positive 6MWT results regarding the sensation of shortness of breath and the ability to walk [41]. Further, in a review by Bell et al [42], when exercises were performed with an oxygen supply, the groups showed improvements in the physical functioning, social functioning, mental health, and general health domains of the SF-36.

Telerehabilitation is already well documented in the literature. It is an effective, safe practice; promotes the maintenance and improvement of functional capacity and quality of life; and is cost-effective [8,14-19,33]. This practice is already recommended by several institutions, such as the World Health Organization, World Physiotherapy, and the INPTRA, but each country has its legal issues, depending on the profession [20,21]. For physical therapy, our data are important, given that organizations that carry out programs remotely can reach a greater number of patients with the most diverse comorbidities, even those who have difficulties with accessing such programs due to demographic, cultural, or financial reasons. As such, remote programs are an excellent opportunity for physical therapists to engage with broad audiences to improve effects and impacts, resulting in the provision of services, resources, and information in an easier and faster way [21].

Our study has several limitations. One of the main limitations is the heterogeneity of the sample. We observed that the control group was older and had higher BMIs than those of the telerehabilitation group. However, we also observed that, in relation to lung function, the groups were similar. The low number of participants and the study design, as it was not possible to conduct a randomized clinical trial due to the urgency of reorganizing the rehabilitation service in view of the advance of the COVID-19 pandemic, are also limitations. It is understood that practices may differ across regions and health care providers; hence, a multicenter, prospective randomized study is needed to understand the role of web-based telerehabilitation in a range of clinical settings. Further research is required to determine optimal exercise training modalities and identify strategies for maximizing the long-term benefits in patients with chronic lung diseases.

Conclusion

This study shows that conducting a telerehabilitation program for patients with chronic lung diseases can ease the deleterious effects of disease progression. Our results indicate that telerehabilitation can be used as a strategy for maintaining functional capacity and improving aspects of quality of life in patients with chronic lung diseases.

Abbreviations

6MWD 6-minute walk distance

6MWT 6-minute walk test

COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

HRQOL health-related quality of life

INPTRA International Network of Physical Therapy Regulatory Authorities

IPF idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

ISCMPA Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre

PRP pulmonary rehabilitation program

SF-36 36-item Short Form Health Survey

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
==== Refs
1 Madjid M Safavi-Naeini P Solomon SD Vardeny O Potential effects of coronaviruses on the cardiovascular system: A review JAMA Cardiol 2020 07 01 5 7 831 840 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1286 32219363 2763846 32219363
2 Banerjee D Rai M Social isolation in Covid-19: The impact of loneliness Int J Soc Psychiatry 2020 09 66 6 525 527 10.1177/0020764020922269 32349580 32349580
3 Khakban A Sin DD FitzGerald JM McManus BM Ng R Hollander Z Sadatsafavi M The projected epidemic of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease hospitalizations over the next 15 years. A population-based perspective Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017 02 01 195 3 287 291 10.1164/rccm.201606-1162PP 27626508 27626508
4 Raghu G Richeldi L Current approaches to the management of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis Respir Med 2017 08 129 24 30 10.1016/j.rmed.2017.05.017 28732832 S0954-6111(17)30159-2 28732832
5 Maher TM Bendstrup E Dron L Langley J Smith G Khalid JM Patel H Kreuter M Global incidence and prevalence of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis Respir Res 2021 07 07 22 1 197 10.1186/s12931-021-01791-z 34233665 10.1186/s12931-021-01791-z 34233665
6 Dowman LM McDonald CF Hill CJ Lee AL Barker K Boote C Glaspole I Goh NSL Southcott AM Burge AT Gillies R Martin A Holland AE The evidence of benefits of exercise training in interstitial lung disease: a randomised controlled trial Thorax 2017 07 72 7 610 619 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-208638 28213592 thoraxjnl-2016-208638 28213592
7 van Manen MJG Geelhoed JJM Tak NC Wijsenbeek MS Optimizing quality of life in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis Ther Adv Respir Dis 2017 03 11 3 157 169 10.1177/1753465816686743 28134007 28134007
8 Cox NS Dal Corso S Hansen H McDonald CF Hill CJ Zanaboni P Alison JA O'Halloran P Macdonald H Holland AE Telerehabilitation for chronic respiratory disease Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021 01 29 1 1 CD013040 10.1002/14651858.CD013040.pub2 33511633 33511633
9 Donaldson GC Wilkinson TMA Hurst JR Perera WR Wedzicha JA Exacerbations and time spent outdoors in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005 03 01 171 5 446 452 10.1164/rccm.200408-1054OC 15579723 200408-1054OC 15579723
10 Pitta F Troosters T Spruit MA Probst VS Decramer M Gosselink R Characteristics of physical activities in daily life in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005 05 01 171 9 972 977 10.1164/rccm.200407-855OC 15665324 200407-855OC 15665324
11 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: 2019 report Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2019 2022-12-06 https://goldcopd.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/GOLD-2019-v1.7-FINAL-14Nov2018-WMS.pdf
12 Malaguti C Dal Corso S Janjua S Holland AE Supervised maintenance programmes following pulmonary rehabilitation compared to usual care for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021 08 17 8 8 CD013569 10.1002/14651858.CD013569.pub2 34404111 34404111
13 Bonnevie T Smondack P Elkins M Gouel B Medrinal C Combret Y Muir JF Cuvelier A Prieur G Gravier FE Advanced telehealth technology improves home-based exercise therapy for people with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review J Physiother 2021 01 67 1 27 40 10.1016/j.jphys.2020.12.006 33358547 S1836-9553(20)30142-9 33358547
14 Cerdán-de-Las-Heras J Balbino F Løkke A Catalán-Matamoros D Hilberg O Bendstrup E Tele-rehabilitation program in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis-A single-center randomized trial Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021 09 23 18 19 10016 10.3390/ijerph181910016 34639313 ijerph181910016 34639313
15 Galdiz JB Gómez A Rodriguez D Guell R Cebollero P Hueto J Cejudo P Ortega F Sayago I Chic S Iscar M Amado C Trigo GR Cosio BG Bustamante V Pijoan JI Telerehabilitation programme as a maintenance strategy for COPD patients: A 12-month randomized clinical trial Arch Bronconeumol (Engl Ed) 2021 03 57 3 195 204 10.1016/j.arbres.2020.03.034 32439253 S0300-2896(20)30116-2 32439253
16 Bernocchi P Vitacca M La Rovere MT Volterrani M Galli T Baratti D Paneroni M Campolongo G Sposato B Scalvini S Home-based telerehabilitation in older patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failure: a randomised controlled trial Age Ageing 2018 01 01 47 1 82 88 10.1093/ageing/afx146 28985325 4097568 28985325
17 Hansen H Bieler T Beyer N Kallemose T Wilcke JT Østergaard LM Andeassen HF Martinez G Lavesen M Frølich A Godtfredsen NS Supervised pulmonary tele-rehabilitation versus pulmonary rehabilitation in severe COPD: a randomised multicentre trial Thorax 2020 05 75 5 413 421 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-214246 32229541 thoraxjnl-2019-214246 32229541
18 Bourne S DeVos R North M Chauhan A Green B Brown T Cornelius V Wilkinson T Online versus face-to-face pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: randomised controlled trial BMJ Open 2017 07 17 7 7 e014580 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014580 28716786 bmjopen-2016-014580
19 Vasilopoulou M Papaioannou AI Kaltsakas G Louvaris Z Chynkiamis N Spetsioti S Kortianou E Genimata SA Palamidas A Kostikas K Koulouris NG Vogiatzis I Home-based maintenance tele-rehabilitation reduces the risk for acute exacerbations of COPD, hospitalisations and emergency department visits Eur Respir J 2017 05 25 49 5 1602129 10.1183/13993003.02129-2016 28546268 49/5/1602129 28546268
20 WHO Global Observatory for eHealth Telemedicine: Opportunities and developments in Member States: Report on the second global survey on eHealth World Health Organization 2010 2022-12-06 https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/44497/9789241564144_eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
21 World PhysiotherapyInternational Network of Physical Therapy Regulatory Authorities Report of the World Physiotherapy/INPTRA digital physical therapy practice task force World Physiotherapy 2019 2022-12-06 https://world.physio/sites/default/files/2021-06/digital-practice-report-2021-FINAL.pdf
22 Presidência da República, Secretaria-Geral, Subchefia para Assuntos Jurídicos Lei Nº 13.989, de 15 de Abril de 2020 Presidência da República 2020 2022-12-06 http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2019-2022/2020/lei/L13989.htm
23 Cepeda RM Resolução Nº 516, de 20 de Março de 2020 – Teleconsulta, Telemonitoramento e Teleconsultoria Conselho Federal de Fisioterapia e Terapia Ocupacional 2020 2022-12-06 https://www.coffito.gov.br/nsite/?p=15825
24 Florian J Watte G Teixeira PJZ Altmayer S Schio SM Sanchez LB Nascimento DZ Camargo SM Perin FA Camargo JDJ Felicetti JC Moreira JDS Pulmonary rehabilitation improves survival in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis undergoing lung transplantation Sci Rep 2019 06 27 9 1 9347 10.1038/s41598-019-45828-2 10.1038/s41598-019-45828-2 31249363 10.1038/s41598-019-45828-2 31249363
25 Ries AL Minimally clinically important difference for the UCSD Shortness of Breath Questionnaire, Borg Scale, and Visual Analog Scale COPD 2005 03 2 1 105 110 10.1081/copd-200050655 17136970 17136970
26 Scherr J Wolfarth B Christle JW Pressler A Wagenpfeil S Halle M Associations between Borg's rating of perceived exertion and physiological measures of exercise intensity Eur J Appl Physiol 2013 01 113 1 147 155 10.1007/s00421-012-2421-x 22615009 22615009
27 ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002 07 01 166 1 111 117 10.1164/ajrccm.166.1.at1102 12091180 12091180
28 Campolina AG Ciconelli RM [SF-36 and the development of new assessment tools for quality of life] Acta Reumatol Port 2008 33 2 127 133 18604180 18604180
29 du Bois RM Albera C Bradford WZ Costabel U Leff JA Noble PW Sahn SA Valeyre D Weycker D King TE Jr 6-Minute walk distance is an independent predictor of mortality in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis Eur Respir J 2014 05 43 5 1421 1429 10.1183/09031936.00131813 24311766 09031936.00131813 24311766
30 Lederer DJ Arcasoy SM Wilt JS D'Ovidio F Sonett JR Kawut SM Six-minute-walk distance predicts waiting list survival in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006 09 15 174 6 659 664 10.1164/rccm.200604-520OC 16778159 200604-520OC 16778159
31 Wise RA Brown CD Minimal clinically important differences in the six-minute walk test and the incremental shuttle walking test COPD 2005 03 2 1 125 129 10.1081/copd-200050527 17136972 17136972
32 Godtfredsen N Frølich A Bieler T Beyer N Kallemose T Wilcke T Østergaard L Andreassen HF Martinez G Lavesen M Hansen H 12-months follow-up of pulmonary tele-rehabilitation versus standard pulmonary rehabilitation: A multicentre randomised clinical trial in patients with severe COPD Respir Med 2020 10 172 106129 10.1016/j.rmed.2020.106129 32905893 S0954-6111(20)30269-9 32905893
33 Liu S Zhao Q Li W Zhao X Li K The cost-effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation for COPD in different settings: A systematic review Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2021 05 19 3 313 324 10.1007/s40258-020-00613-5 33079374 10.1007/s40258-020-00613-5 33079374
34 Roschel H Artioli GG Gualano B Risk of increased physical inactivity during COVID-19 outbreak in older people: A call for actions J Am Geriatr Soc 2020 06 68 6 1126 1128 10.1111/jgs.16550 32392620 32392620
35 Roberts A Rogers J Mason R Siriwardena AN Hogue T Whitley GA Law GR Alcohol and other substance use during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review Drug Alcohol Depend 2021 12 01 229 Pt A 109150 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.109150 34749198 S0376-8716(21)00645-1 34749198
36 United Nations Policy brief: COVID-19 and the need for action on mental health United Nations Sustainable Development Group 2020 05 13 2022-12-06 https://unsdg.un.org/sites/default/files/2020-05/UN-Policy-Brief-COVID-19-and-mental-health.pdf
37 Canadians' mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic Statistics Canada 2020 2022-12-06 https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/200527/dq200527b-eng.htm
38 Codagnone C Bogliacino F Gómez C Folkvord F Liva G Charris R Montealegre F Villanueva FL Veltri GA Restarting "Normal" life after Covid-19 and the lockdown: Evidence from Spain, the United Kingdom, and Italy Soc Indic Res 2021 158 1 241 265 10.1007/s11205-021-02697-5 33994649 2697 33994649
39 Xiang YT Yang Y Li W Zhang L Zhang Q Cheung T Ng CH Timely mental health care for the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak is urgently needed Lancet Psychiatry 2020 03 7 3 228 229 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30046-8 32032543 S2215-0366(20)30046-8 32032543
40 Bentlage E Ammar A How D Ahmed M Trabelsi K Chtourou H Brach M Practical recommendations for maintaining active lifestyle during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic literature review Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020 08 28 17 17 6265 10.3390/ijerph17176265 32872154 ijerph17176265 32872154
41 Visca D Mori L Tsipouri V Fleming S Firouzi A Bonini M Pavitt MJ Alfieri V Canu S Bonifazi M Boccabella C De Lauretis A Stock CJW Saunders P Montgomery A Hogben C Stockford A Pittet M Brown J Chua F George PM Molyneaux PL Margaritopoulos GA Kokosi M Kouranos V Russell AM Birring SS Chetta A Maher TM Cullinan P Hopkinson NS Banya W Whitty JA Adamali H Spencer LG Farquhar M Sestini P Wells AU Renzoni EA Effect of ambulatory oxygen on quality of life for patients with fibrotic lung disease (AmbOx): a prospective, open-label, mixed-method, crossover randomised controlled trial Lancet Respir Med 2018 10 6 10 759 770 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30289-3 30170904 S2213-2600(18)30289-3 30170904
42 Bell EC Cox NS Goh N Glaspole I Westall GP Watson A Holland AE Oxygen therapy for interstitial lung disease: a systematic review Eur Respir Rev 2017 01 21 26 143 160080 10.1183/16000617.0080-2016 28223395 26/143/160080 28223395
