
==== Front
Cureus
Cureus
2168-8184
Cureus
2168-8184
Cureus Palo Alto (CA)

10.7759/cureus.66218
Radiation Oncology
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT)-Guided Adaptive Boost Radiotherapy for a Patient With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Ineligible for Brachytherapy
Muacevic Alexander
Adler John R
Silberstein Alice E 1
Schiff Joshua P 1
Beckert Robbie 1
Zhao Xiaodong 1
Laugeman Eric 1
Markovina Stephanie 1
Contreras Jessika A 1
1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA
Alice E. Silberstein a.e.silberstein@wustl.edu
5 8 2024
8 2024
16 8 e662182 8 2024
Copyright © 2024, Silberstein et al.
2024
Silberstein et al.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
This article is available from https://www.cureus.com/articles/264842-cone-beam-computed-tomography-cbct-guided-adaptive-boost-radiotherapy-for-a-patient-with-locally-advanced-cervical-cancer-ineligible-for-brachytherapy
Brachytherapy is a critical component of locally advanced cervical cancer treatment, and patients ineligible for brachytherapy historically have poor outcomes. Delivery of boost with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been studied, though toxicity is a concern. Recent case reports have explored adaptive radiation boost, which can adjust plans for inter-fraction motion using magnetic resonance guidance. Herein, we report the first patient with locally advanced cervical cancer ineligible for brachytherapy who was treated with a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided adaptive boost following completion of chemoradiation. A 71-year-old female with locally advanced cervical cancer was treated with chemoradiation and was deemed ineligible for a brachytherapy boost due to tumor size, geometry, and a fistula with a tumor in the bladder. She was prescribed a boost to the primary tumor of 25 Gy in five fractions using CBCT-guided adaptive radiation following the completion of chemoradiation. A simulation was performed using a non-contrast CT fused with a mid-chemoradiation magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan to create an initial plan. For each treatment fraction, kilovoltage CBCTs were acquired, contours of organs at risk (OARs) were adjusted to reflect anatomy-of-the-day, and an adapted plan was generated. The initial and adapted plans were compared using dose-volume histogram objectives, and the adapted plan was used if it resolved OAR constraint violations or improved target coverage. The use of the initial treatment plan would have resulted in constraint violations for the rectum, sigmoid, and bladder in all fractions. The adapted plans achieved hard constraints in all fractions for all four critical OARs. The mean total treatment time across all five fractions was 58 minutes. This case demonstrates the feasibility of a CBCT-guided adaptive boost approach and the dosimetric benefits of plan adaptation in this setting. Though larger-scale and longer-term data are needed, CBCT-guided adaptive radiation may present a feasible alternative modality to deliver boost doses for brachytherapy-ineligible patients.

online adaptive radiation therapy
locally advanced cervical cancer
brachytherapy ineligible
cbct-guided adaptation
cone-beam computed tomography (cbct)
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer [1,2]. Brachytherapy, used to deliver a boost to the primary tumor, is a critical component of definitive radiation in this setting. However, patients may be ineligible for brachytherapy for various reasons, including anatomic limitations, medical comorbidities, or refusal to undergo brachytherapy [3-5], and such patients with contraindications to brachytherapy or severe medical conditions have been excluded from the landmark EMBRACE I/II trials [6,7]. Treatment of these patients is challenging: population-based studies repeatedly demonstrate inferior survival among those treated without brachytherapy [8-10], and studies delivering boost doses using external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) alone in this population historically have resulted in poor local control and survival outcomes [3,11-13].

More recently, alternative approaches to boost delivery for brachytherapy-ineligible patients have been explored. In particular, there has been interest in the use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), and several studies have reported improved local control compared to historic EBRT boost studies [4,5,14-16]. However, toxicity is a concern, given the potential for the movement of cervical tumors and organs at risk (OARs), which may not be well visualized on standard cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans [4,17]. Adaptive radiation is well suited to address the challenges of inter-fraction motion [18], and select case reports have utilized magnetic resonance-guided adaptive radiation for brachytherapy-ineligible patients [19-21]. Herein, we report the first patient with locally advanced cervical cancer ineligible for brachytherapy who was treated with a CBCT-guided adaptive boost following the completion of chemoradiation.

Case presentation

Patient presentation

A 71-year-old woman presented to the hospital with vaginal bleeding and renal failure. During her work-up, imaging demonstrated a 6.8 cm infiltrative cervical mass invading the urinary bladder, upper vagina, and bilateral ureters, as well as metastases to pelvic nodes, para-aortic nodes, and the right ovary (Figure 1). A vesicovaginal fistula was also present. A biopsy of the cervical mass confirmed squamous cell carcinoma. Due to ongoing vaginal bleeding requiring repeated transfusions, the patient first received a palliative course of cervical ring brachytherapy consisting of 10 Gy in two fractions prescribed to the surface of the cervix; this is our institutional standard for emergent vaginal bleeding due to cervical tumors and has been previously published [22]. Per departmental workflow, we do not include this dose in our overall EBRT/boost dose calculations. For definitive treatment, she was recommended EBRT with concurrent weekly carboplatin, followed by a boost to her primary tumor. EBRT consisted of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions to her primary mass, pelvic nodes, and para-aortic nodes, with simultaneous integrated boosts to the right ovary (55 Gy) and positron emission tomography (PET)-positive para-aortic and common iliac nodes (60 Gy). Midway through the patient’s course of EBRT, pelvic exam and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were repeated and demonstrated persistently bulky and largely anterior disease (Figure 2). Given the tumor size, geometry, and the fistula with a tumor in the bladder that was not accessible with an applicator or interstitial needles, she was deemed ineligible for brachytherapy. Instead, she was recommended for a boost treatment using CBCT-guided adaptive radiation, consisting of 25 Gy in five fractions.

Figure 1 Pre-treatment PET-CT

This patient had IVA disease, including a bulky primary tumor invading the bladder (red arrow, panel A) as well as pelvic node (blue arrow, panel B) and right ovarian (green arrow, panel B) metastases, amongst other clinical findings.

PET-CT: Positron emission tomography-computed tomography

Figure 2 Pre- and mid-treatment T2-weighted MRIs

Diagnostic MRI of the tumor pre-treatment (panel A) and MRI of the tumor midway through chemoradiation, prior to boost delivery (panel B), with a red outline indicating the contours used to delineate tumor extent in planning initial external beam (panel A) and boost (panel B) treatments.

This patient had minimal response to chemotherapy and external beam radiation. Note the bulky, largely anterior disease, which made this patient ineligible for brachytherapy per the treating gynecologic radiation oncologist.

MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging

Boost treatment planning and delivery

An additional simulation was performed after the completion of chemoradiation to redefine tumor anatomy and to create an initial plan (Pi) for the boost treatment. The patient was simulated using a non-contrast CT. She was positioned supine, with her arms on her chest and without immobilization. Of note, the patient had bilateral percutaneous nephrostomy tubes in place and, therefore, had a consistently empty bladder. Fiducials were placed prior to any treatment to delineate tumor extent, and the MRI obtained midway through the patient’s EBRT course was fused to the simulation images to assist in target delineation.

All planning was performed in the ETHOS (v.1.1) treatment planning system (TPS). The gross tumor volume (GTV) comprised the gross tumor on simulation CT and T2-weighted MRI. The clinical target volume (CTV) was defined as the GTV plus the entire cervix, any areas of presumed extra-cervical tumor spread, and T2 MRI gray zones, according to high-risk CTV volume delineation, as described in the EMBRACE II protocol (Figure 3) [7]. Of note, our high-risk CTV volumes do not include the entire uterus [23]. A 0.7 cm uniform volumetric expansion was applied to the CTV to form a planning target volume (PTV).

Figure 3 Boost plan target contours

CTV (green) and PTV (cyan) are depicted on both CT (left, panels A and C) and MRI (right, panels B and D) simulation on axial (top, panels A and B) and sagittal (bottom, panels C and D) slices.

Note that the patient has a fibroid uterus, which was not included in the CTV per our institutional standard.

CTV: Clinical target volume; PTV: Planning target volume; CT: Computed tomography; MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging

OARs, namely the bladder, rectum, sigmoid, and bowel, were contoured on axial slices from 3 cm below to 3 cm above the PTV. Dose constraints are defined in Table 1. To establish these constraints, the maximum dose to OARs was calculated from the EBRT plan and converted to the biologically equivalent dose in 2 Gy per fraction (EQD23) using an alpha/beta ratio of 3 for normal tissue. Per-fraction constraints were then calculated by subtracting the EQD23 dose delivered with EBRT from standard widely accepted cervical cancer constraints [2,7]. Of note, we did not use the EMBRACE II D2 cc metrics for the boost constraints, as this was an SBRT-like plan, and we were primarily concerned with limiting maximum doses to minimize toxicity. Therefore, we converted the constraint to volumetric 0.03 cc constraints. In keeping with institutional adaptive radiation practices [24-26], maximum volumetric 0.03 cc constraints were prioritized over target coverage. One exception to this approach was in the area of gross tumor invasion into the bladder with a pre-existing fistula, where target coverage was prioritized. To limit dose in other areas of direct overlap between the PTV and OARs, a PTV optimization structure was created by taking the PTV and subtracting the OARs with the addition of a margin (5 mm for sigmoid and rectum, 3 mm for bladder). This structure was then used to drive prescription doses during treatment planning.

Table 1 OAR dose constraints

The boost D2 cc dose constraints for the critical OARs were derived using EQD23 calculations based on maximum OAR tolerances as dictated by the EMBRACE II protocol. Once the max EQD23 EBRT contribution was calculated per OAR, the remaining dose was converted into a volumetric constraint for the five-fraction boost plan.

OAR: Organ at risk; EBRT: External beam radiation therapy; EQD23: Biologically equivalent dose in 2 Gy per fraction, using an alpha/beta ratio of 3

OAR	EQD23 D2cc constraint	EBRT Dmax	EBRT EQD23 Dmax	Boost tolerance dose per fraction (for a five-fraction plan)	Boost volumetric constraint (V 0.03 cc ≤)	
Bladder	90 Gy	54 Gy	53.2 Gy	5.0 Gy	25 Gy	
Rectum	75 Gy	54 Gy	53.2 Gy	3.4 Gy	17 Gy	
Sigmoid	75 Gy	54 Gy	53.2 Gy	3.4 Gy	17 Gy	
Bowel	75 Gy	60 Gy	61.7 Gy	2.4 Gy	12 Gy	

An adapted plan was created for each treatment fraction based on the patient’s anatomy-of-the-day using a daily kilovolt (kV) CBCT. The TPS then auto-contoured the bladder and rectum OARs using an artificial intelligence algorithm. Sigmoid and bowel contours were deformably registered and then manually edited by the treatment team. The simulation GTV and CTV were rigidly copied over to the anatomy-of-the-day and edited at the discretion of the covering radiation oncologist. Subsequently, expansions to generate the PTV were reapplied. The Pi was projected onto this anatomy-of-the-day, and simultaneously, a re-optimized adapted plan (Pa) was generated. The plans were compared using dose-volume histogram (DVH) objectives, and the Pa was used if it resolved an OAR hard constraint or improved target coverage by 5% or greater when compared to the Pi.

If the Pa was selected for treatment, a subsequent secondary dose calculation quality assurance software was run, and treatment was delivered. If the Pi was selected, no additional quality assurance was performed. A post-adaptive contouring and planning CBCT, as well as a mid-treatment CBCT, were acquired to confirm target positioning, and the treatments were delivered with intra-fraction free breathing motion monitoring using surface guidance.

Dosimetric and treatment data

PTV volume per fraction, in order of fractions, was 407.4 cc, 420.9 cc, 412.7 cc, 423.8 cc, and 420.1 cc, with a mean PTV volume of 417.0 cc across fractions. Constraint and coverage metrics for the Pi and Pa overlaid on anatomy-of-the-day are demonstrated in Table 2. In all five fractions, the use of the Pi on the patient’s anatomy-of-the-day would have resulted in bladder, rectum, and sigmoid constraint violations. In contrast, the Pa achieved constraints in all five fractions and was used for treatment every day. Figure 4 compares the Pi and Pa in a single fraction and illustrates how daily adaptation allowed this fraction to achieve the rectum hard constraint, which would have been violated if the Pi had been used.

Table 2 Target metrics and OAR constraints

Target metrics and OAR constraints for each of the five fractions when the initial (Pi) and adapted (Pa) plans were overlaid on the anatomy-of-the-day. There were bladder, rectum, and sigmoid constraint violations when using the Pi in each fraction, resulting in a total of 15 dose constraint violations (bolded in the table) and the use of Pa for treatment every day. Note that the V100% is not always increased in the Pa compared to the Pi, as in certain fractions target coverage may need to be sacrificed to meet an OAR constraint.

* Represents dose to bladder excluding the bladder volume with gross tumor invasion and pre-existing fistula.

PTV: Planning target volume; CTV: Clinical target volume; GTV: Gross tumor volume; OAR: Organ at risk

Parameter	Fraction 1	Fraction 2	Fraction 3	Fraction 4	Fraction 5	
Pi	Pa	Pi	Pa	Pi	Pa	Pi	Pa	Pi	Pa	
PTV V100% (%)	74.2%	30.2%	75.7%	67.7%	75.3%	62.1%	73.0%	60.7%	61.1%	64.4%	
CTV V100% (%)	86.8%	45.8%	87.5%	82.1%	86.6%	78.1%	84.8%	77.6%	78.1%	79.3%	
GTV V100% (%)	95.3%	82.3%	95.0%	94.5%	94.5%	94.4%	89.2%	89.8%	94.3%	95.5%	
Bladder V25 Gy ≤ 0.03 cc (cc)*	0.67 cc	0.00 cc	1.18 cc	0.00 cc	0.47 cc	0.00 cc	0.09 cc	0.00 cc	0.16 cc	0.00 cc	
Rectum V17 Gy ≤ 0.03 cc (cc)	6.02 cc	0.03 cc	7.00 cc	0.02 cc	11.70 cc	0.03 cc	9.18 cc	0.03 cc	7.80 cc	0.02 cc	
Sigmoid V17 Gy ≤ 0.03 cc (cc)	4.56 cc	0.00 cc	9.85 cc	0.02 cc	1.10 cc	0.00 cc	2.52 cc	0.03 cc	2.06 cc	0.02 cc	
Bowel V12 Gy ≤ 0.03 cc (cc)	0.00 cc	0.00 cc	0.00 cc	0.00 cc	0.00 cc	0.00 cc	0.00 cc	0.00 cc	0.00 cc	0.00 cc	

Figure 4 Comparison of initial and adaptive plans

Initial (panel A) and adaptive (panel B) plans for a single fraction of radiation. In the initial plan, the high-dose color wash (>17 Gy) is in the rectum (red outline), while in the adapted plan, the high-dose color wash does not enter the rectum. The dose volume histogram (panel C) demonstrates the dose delivered to the small bowel in the initial (triangle) and adaptive (square) plans, with arrows labeling the maximum rectum dose for each plan. 

Treatment component times were recorded and are demonstrated in Table 3. The mean total treatment time was 58 minutes. Over the course of chemoradiation and adaptive boost, the patient experienced grade 1 fatigue, grade 1 nausea, and grade 2 diarrhea, all of which resolved at six weeks post-treatment. The patient completed all treatments and is currently alive, without evidence of high-grade toxicity or local recurrence, at two months post-treatment.

Table 3 Treatment component times

Treatment component times are presented for each fraction in minutes. Plan adaptation is measured as time from initial CBCT to pre-treatment CBCT, including time required for contouring, plan re-optimization, plan review, and quality assurance. Timing measurements do not include patient setup time.

CBCT: Cone beam computed tomography

Treatment fraction	Plan adaptation time (minutes)	Beam delivery time (minutes)	Total treatment time (minutes)	
Fraction 1	32	24	56	
Fraction 2	33	13	46	
Fraction 3	35	33	68	
Fraction 4	42	22	64	
Fraction 5	36	20	56	
Mean	36	22	58	
Standard deviation	3.9	7.2	8.5	

Discussion

In this case study, we describe the first reported patient with locally advanced cervical cancer ineligible for brachytherapy who was treated with a CBCT-guided adaptive boost following completion of chemoradiation. Our results illustrate that delivery of Pi would have resulted in constraint violations for the bladder, rectum, and sigmoid in each fraction, while Pa met all OAR constraints and simultaneously achieved excellent GTV coverage for each fraction. With this approach, the patient received 80.8 Gy EQD210, using an alpha/beta ratio of 10 for the tumor, in total across chemoradiation and boost treatments without violating constraints for critical pelvic organs. Of note, we delivered a lower dose relative to the 85 Gy target in EMBRACE II [7] to prioritize the sparing of OARs, given that a prior study delivering SBRT in a similar setting resulted in grade 5 toxicities [4].

Brachytherapy is a vital component of cervical cancer treatment [1,2,27]. It offers key advantages over EBRT, which collectively facilitate the sparing of normal tissues: radiation sources with rapid dose fall-off are placed in close proximity to the tumor, and the securing of brachytherapy devices reduces uncertainty in the positioning of the tumor and OARs [28]. As a result, the brachytherapy boost allows for the delivery of high total doses of over 85 Gy (EQD210) to tumors with low rates of toxicity [6]. Nevertheless, many factors may preclude patients from brachytherapy, and the delivery of sufficient doses is challenging in this population because the dose delivered via external radiation is limited by the tolerance of surrounding organs [11,12]. In prior studies delivering EBRT boost using 3D conformal radiation, lower total doses of 54-72 Gy were prescribed [3,11-13]. These studies consistently demonstrated poor outcomes, including high rates of incomplete response and local failure, as well as poor overall survival (Table 4). SBRT has since become an area of interest in this setting due to its ability to deliver highly conformal doses [28]. However, the inability to control motion, including the movement of critical normal structures and tumor regression during treatment [29], presents a key limitation for SBRT in this setting [17,18]. While a number of small studies have used SBRT to deliver higher total doses to tumors, with median EQD210 ranging from 74 to 90 [4,5,14-16], toxicity is a concern: one key study closed prematurely due to GI toxicity, including two toxicities resulting in death [4]. As a result, the safe delivery of adequate boost doses remains a challenge in the brachytherapy-ineligible population.

Table 4 Summary of studies exploring boost alternatives among cervical cancer patients unsuitable for brachytherapy

* Represent outcomes as of the patient’s last follow-up unless otherwise specified; ** 71% received 60-65 Gy; *** Represents LC among patients who achieved CR

EQD210: Biologically equivalent dose in 2 Gy per fraction, using an alpha/beta ratio of 10; CR: Complete response; LC: Local control; LRC: Locoregional control; PFS: Progression-free survival; OS: Overall survival; GI: Gastrointestinal; GU: Genitourinary; NR: Not reported; EBRT: External beam radiation therapy; SBRT: Stereotactic body radiation therapy; MR: Magnetic resonance; ART: Adaptive radiation therapy

Boost approach	Study	N	Median total dose Gy, EQD210 (range)	Median follow-up (months)	Oncologic outcomes*	GI/GU toxicity (≥ grade 3)	
CR	LC/LRC	PFS	OS	
EBRT boost	Barraclough et al. (2008) [11]	44	NR** (54-70)	28	NR	64% LC	52%	49% at 5 years	2% acute, 2% late	
Kadkhodayan et al. (2013) [12]	30	70	26	63%	NR	33%	39% at 3 years	13% acute, 17% late	
Karlsson et al. (2017) [3]	86	68 (64-72)	42 (mean)	73%	83% LC***	25%	25% at 5 years	0% acute, 8.1% late	
Ito et al. (2019) [13]	37	60 (56-70)	17	50%	68% LC	29% at 2 years	43% at 2 years	14% acute, 5% late	
SBRT Boost	Haas et al. (2012) [14]	6	84 (76-84)	14	100%	100% LC	100%	100%	0% total	
Hsieh et al. (2013) [15]	9	79 (65-83)	36	78%	78% LRC	26%	47% at 3 years	11% acute, 11% late	
Marnitz et al. (2013) [16]	11	90	6	100%	100% LC	100%	100%	0% total	
Albuquerque et al. (2020) [4]	15	84	19	NR	70% LC at 2 years	47% at 2 years	53% at 2 years	27% total	
Ito et al. (2024) [5]	21	74 (74-77)	40	95%	84% LRC at 2 years	67% at 2 years	81% at 2 years	5% acute, 5% late	
MR-guided ART boost	Ugurluer et al. (2024) [21]	4	86 (82-90)	11	67%	NR	NR	75% at 1 year	0% total	

Adaptive radiation therapy (ART) with MR or CBCT guidance may present a suitable solution for this patient population due to the ability to adjust plans to account for inter-fraction motion [18]. Adaptive planning is well-established in cervical cancer: image-guided adaptation is standard practice for cervical brachytherapy [30,31], and studies have demonstrated that adaptation in this setting improves dosimetry [32,33] and achieves excellent clinical outcomes [6,34]. To date, four cases have been reported of MR-guided ART boost following definitive chemoradiation for cervical cancer, and a median total dose of 86 Gy (range 82-90, EQD210) was prescribed [19,21]. There are three other published cases where MR-guided ART was used to boost the primary tumor in gynecologic cancer: one for a cervical cancer recurrence, another for endometrial recurrence with bladder involvement [21], and another in which the patient received EBRT, two fractions of brachytherapy, and then MR-guided ART [20]. All aforementioned cases were delivered without violating critical OAR constraints, and no grade 3 or higher gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicities have been reported. Though the number of cases is limited and long-term follow-up data are required, these data provide preliminary support that ART may be a feasible option to provide a boost dose when patients are ineligible for brachytherapy.

Our case report similarly describes the delivery of a high total radiation dose with ART for cervical cancer but is distinct as the first report of doing so with CBCT guidance. Of note, there are potential limitations to using CBCT guidance in this setting. Though CT can sufficiently delineate critical OARs [35], MRI is superior to CT in delineating the margins of cervical tumors and, as such, is an essential component of initial treatment planning in EBRT simulations and the initial fraction of brachytherapy [36]. It is therefore possible that MR-guided ART may better characterize any tumor regression that occurs during treatment, thereby allowing shrinkage of targets and potential further OAR sparing. However, given that all fractions of ART are delivered within a week, we would not anticipate significant tumor regression between each fraction and believe a pre-treatment simulation MRI should be sufficient. Our approach is also time-intensive, with a mean treatment time of 58 minutes, which can limit the ability to use this treatment modality for large volumes of patients. The ETHOS platform is continually evolving, and it is possible that further refinement of auto-contouring and plan re-optimization may reduce treatment time in the future.

Conclusions

Herein, we illustrate a case of CBCT-guided adaptive radiation boost for a patient with cervical cancer who was ineligible for brachytherapy. We demonstrate the feasibility of our approach and the dosimetric benefits of plan adaptation in this setting. Though larger-scale and longer-term data are needed, this case demonstrates a potential approach to boost tumors in a challenging treatment setting.

Disclosures

Author Contributions

Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study.

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.

Financial relationships: Joshua P. Schiff declare(s) a grant from Varian Medical Systems.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Concept and design:  Alice E. Silberstein, Joshua P. Schiff, Robbie Beckert, Eric Laugeman, Xiaodong Zhao, Stephanie Markovina, Jessika A. Contreras

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Alice E. Silberstein, Joshua P. Schiff, Robbie Beckert, Eric Laugeman, Xiaodong Zhao, Stephanie Markovina, Jessika A. Contreras

Drafting of the manuscript:  Alice E. Silberstein, Joshua P. Schiff, Robbie Beckert, Eric Laugeman, Xiaodong Zhao, Stephanie Markovina, Jessika A. Contreras

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Alice E. Silberstein, Joshua P. Schiff, Robbie Beckert, Eric Laugeman, Xiaodong Zhao, Stephanie Markovina, Jessika A. Contreras

Supervision:  Joshua P. Schiff, Jessika A. Contreras
==== Refs
References

1 ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with cervical cancer - update 2023 Int J Gynecol Cancer Cibula D Raspollini MR Planchamp F 649 666 33 2023 37127326
2 American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines for locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix. Part II: high-dose-rate brachytherapy Brachytherapy Viswanathan AN Beriwal S De Los Santos JF 47 52 11 2012 22265437
3 Differences in outcome for cervical cancer patients treated with or without brachytherapy Brachytherapy Karlsson J Dreifaldt AC Mordhorst LB Sorbe B 133 140 16 2017 27836496
4 A phase II trial of stereotactic ablative radiation therapy as a boost for locally advanced cervical cancer Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Albuquerque K Tumati V Lea J Ahn C Richardson D Miller D Timmerman R 464 471 106 2020 31697990
5 Phase I/II study of stereotactic body radiotherapy boost in patients with cervical cancer ineligible for intracavitary brachytherapy Jpn J Radiol Ito K Nakajima Y Ogawa H 909 917 42 2024 38625476
6 MRI-guided adaptive brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer (EMBRACE-I): a multicentre prospective cohort study Lancet Oncol Pötter R Tanderup K Schmid MP 538 547 22 2021 33794207
7 The EMBRACE II study: the outcome and prospect of two decades of evolution within the GEC-ESTRO GYN working group and the EMBRACE studies Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Pötter R Tanderup K Kirisits C 48 60 9 2018 29594251
8 Trends in the utilization of brachytherapy in cervical cancer in the United States Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Han K Milosevic M Fyles A Pintilie M Viswanathan AN 111 119 87 2013 23849695
9 National Cancer Data Base analysis of radiation therapy consolidation modality for cervical cancer: the impact of new technological advancements Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Gill BS Lin JF Krivak TC 1083 1090 90 2014 25216857
10 Updated trends in the utilization of brachytherapy in cervical cancer in the United States: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end-results study Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Han K Colson-Fearon D Liu ZA Viswanathan AN 143 153 119 2024 37951548
11 External beam boost for cancer of the cervix uteri when intracavitary therapy cannot be performed Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Barraclough LH Swindell R Livsey JE Hunter RD Davidson SE 772 778 71 2008 18207658
12 Concurrent chemoradiotherapy without brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer Iran J Cancer Prev Kadkhodayan S Homaei Shandiz F Seilanian Toussi M Afzal Aghaee M Farshidi F Dehghan P 195 200 6 2013 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25250134/ 25250134
13 Clinical outcomes following conventional external beam radiotherapy boost in Japanese patients with cervical cancer who are ineligible for intracavitary brachytherapy Jpn J Clin Oncol Ito K Shimizuguchi T Karasawa K 270 275 49 2019 30576504
14 CyberKnife boost for patients with cervical cancer unable to undergo brachytherapy Front Oncol Haas JA Witten MR Clancey O Episcopia K Accordino D Chalas E 25 2 2012 22655266
15 Stereotactic body radiation therapy via helical tomotherapy to replace brachytherapy for brachytherapy-unsuitable cervical cancer patients - a preliminary result Onco Targets Ther Hsieh CH Tien HJ Hsiao SM 59 66 6 2013 23403975
16 Brachytherapy-emulating robotic radiosurgery in patients with cervical carcinoma Radiat Oncol Marnitz S Köhler C Budach V 109 8 2013 23638755
17 Why brachytherapy boost is the treatment of choice for most women with locally advanced cervical carcinoma? Brachytherapy Al Feghali KA Elshaikh MA 191 199 15 2016 26810408
18 Online magnetic resonance image guided adaptive radiation therapy: first clinical applications Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Acharya S Fischer-Valuck BW Kashani R 394 403 94 2016 26678659
19 Magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy to boost cervical cancer when brachytherapy is not available: a case report Adv Radiat Oncol Sayan M Mustafayev TZ Atalar B Gungor G Ozyar E 1066 1070 5 2020 33083668
20 Adaptive magnetic resonance-guided external beam radiation therapy for consolidation in recurrent cervical cancer Adv Radiat Oncol Felici F Benkreira M Lambaudie É 100999 7 2022 36060635
21 Online adaptive magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy for gynaecological cancers: preliminary results of feasibility and outcome Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) Ugurluer G Zoto Mustafayev T Gungor G Abacioglu U Atalar B Ozyar E 12 20 36 2024 38016848
22 High dose ratio (HDR) cervical ring applicator to control bleeding from cervical carcinoma Int J Gynecol Cancer Grigsby PW Portelance L Williamson JF 18 21 12 2002 11913357
23 Less than whole uterus irradiation for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer Radiother Oncol Hui C Ewongwo A Mendoza MG Kozak MM Jackson S Fu J Kidd E 110199 194 2024 38438017
24 Practical clinical workflows for online and offline adaptive radiation therapy Semin Radiat Oncol Green OL Henke LE Hugo GD 219 227 29 2019 31027639
25 Phase I trial of stereotactic MR-guided online adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) for the treatment of oligometastatic or unresectable primary malignancies of the abdomen Radiother Oncol Henke L Kashani R Robinson C 519 526 126 2018 29277446
26 Simulated computed tomography-guided stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy (CT-STAR) for the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer Radiother Oncol Schiff JP Price AT Stowe HB 144 151 175 2022 36063981
27 The ASTRO clinical practice guidelines in cervical cancer: optimizing radiation therapy for improved outcomes Gynecol Oncol Chino J Annunziata CM Beriwal S 607 610 159 2020 32972783
28 Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT): technological innovation and application in gynecologic oncology Gynecol Oncol Higginson DS Morris DE Jones EL Clarke-Pearson D Varia MA 404 412 120 2011 21194733
29 Cervix regression and motion during the course of external beam chemoradiation for cervical cancer Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Beadle BM Jhingran A Salehpour M Sam M Iyer RB Eifel PJ 235 241 73 2009 18513882
30 Recommendations from gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group (I): concepts and terms in 3D image based 3D treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy with emphasis on MRI assessment of GTV and CTV Radiother Oncol Haie-Meder C Pötter R Van Limbergen E 235 245 74 2005 15763303
31 Recommendations from gynaecological (GYN) GEC ESTRO working group (II): concepts and terms in 3D image-based treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy-3D dose volume parameters and aspects of 3D image-based anatomy, radiation physics, radiobiology Radiother Oncol Pötter R Haie-Meder C Van Limbergen E 67 77 78 2006 16403584
32 Uncertainty analysis for 3D image-based cervix cancer brachytherapy by repetitive MR imaging: assessment of DVH-variations between two HDR fractions within one applicator insertion and their clinical relevance Radiother Oncol Lang S Nesvacil N Kirisits C Georg P Dimopoulos JC Federico M Pötter R 26 31 107 2013 23541645
33 Uncertainties when using only one MRI-based treatment plan for subsequent high-dose-rate tandem and ring applications in brachytherapy of cervix cancer Radiother Oncol Kirisits C Lang S Dimopoulos J Oechs K Georg D Pötter R 269 275 81 2006 17126938
34 Clinical impact of MRI assisted dose volume adaptation and dose escalation in brachytherapy of locally advanced cervix cancer Radiother Oncol Pötter R Dimopoulos J Georg P 148 155 83 2007 17531904
35 Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging-based contouring in cervical cancer brachytherapy: results of a prospective trial and preliminary guidelines for standardized contours Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Viswanathan AN Dimopoulos J Kirisits C Berger D Pötter R 491 498 68 2007 17331668
36 Image fusion of CT and MRI data enables improved target volume definition in 3D-brachytherapy treatment planning Brachytherapy Krempien RC Daeuber S Hensley FW Wannenmacher M Harms W 164 171 2 2003 15062139
