
==== Front
PLoS One
PLoS One
plos
PLOS ONE
1932-6203
Public Library of Science San Francisco, CA USA

10.1371/journal.pone.0304466
PONE-D-24-04425
Research Article
Biology and Life Sciences
Plant Science
Plant Anatomy
Leaves
Biology and Life Sciences
Agriculture
Crop Science
Crops
Biology and Life Sciences
Nutrition
Nutrients
Medicine and Health Sciences
Nutrition
Nutrients
Biology and Life Sciences
Biochemistry
Plant Biochemistry
Photosynthesis
Biology and Life Sciences
Plant Science
Plant Biochemistry
Photosynthesis
Physical Sciences
Physics
Electromagnetic Radiation
Solar Radiation
Physical Sciences
Chemistry
Chemical Compounds
Nitrates
Biology and Life Sciences
Plant Science
Plant Anatomy
Seeds
Biology and Life Sciences
Organisms
Eukaryota
Plants
Flowering Plants
Dynamics of growth, physiology, radiation interception, production, and quality of autumn black gram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper) as influenced by nutrient scheduling
Productivity and quality of autumn black gram as influenced by nutrient scheduling
Banerjee Purabi Conceptualization Data curation Formal analysis Investigation Methodology Software Validation Visualization Writing – original draft 1
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6901-680X
Venugopalan Visha Kumari Conceptualization Investigation Methodology Validation Visualization Writing – review & editing 2 *
Nath Rajib Conceptualization Funding acquisition Investigation Methodology Supervision Validation Visualization Writing – original draft 1
Gaber Ahmed Data curation Formal analysis Funding acquisition Software Supervision Writing – review & editing 3
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0264-2712
Hossain Akbar Data curation Formal analysis Resources Software Writing – review & editing 4 *
1 Department of Agronomy, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur, Nadia, West Bengal, India
2 Division of Crop Sciences, ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
3 Department of Biology, College of Science, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia
4 Division of Soil Science, Bangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute, Dinajpur, Bangladesh
Lal Banwari Editor
ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, APRC, Bikaner, INDIA
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

* E-mail: visha.venugopal@gmail.com (VKV); akbarhossainwrc@gmail.com (AH)
4 9 2024
2024
19 9 e03044661 2 2024
14 5 2024
© 2024 Banerjee et al
2024
Banerjee et al
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

To analyse the effect of nutrient management on the growth, physiology, energy utilization, production and quality of black gram, a field trial on black gram was conducted at eastern Indian Gangetic alluvium during the autumn of 2020 and 2021. Treatments were two soil applications of cobalt (Co) and foliar spray of potassium (K) and boron (B) in five combinations. All treatments were arranged in a split-plot design and repeated three times. Two soil applications of cobalt (Co) were assigned in the main plots and foliar spray of potassium (K) and boron (B) in five combinations were assigned in sub-plots. Applications of Co in soil and foliar K+B facilitated significantly higher (p≤0.05) values for aerial dry matter (ADM), leaf area index (LAI), nodules per plant, total chlorophyll, net photosynthetic rate and nitrate reductase content in both 2020 and 2021, with a greater realization of photosynthetically active radiation interception, and use efficiency (IPAR and PARUE respectively), seed yield, seed nutrients and protein contents. Differences in LAI exhibited positive and linear correlation with IPAR explaining more than 60% variations in different growth stages. The innovative combination of soil Co (beneficial nutrient) application at 4 kg ha−1 combined with foliar 1.25% K (macronutrient) + 0.2% B (micronutrient) spray is a potential agronomic management schedule for the farmers to sustain optimum production of autumn black gram through substantial upgradation of growth, physiology, energy utilization, production and quality in Indian subtropics.

Bangladesh and ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad 500059 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6901-680X
Venugopalan Visha Kumari Taif University, Saudi Arabia Project No. (TU-DSPP-2024-07) Gaber Ahmed Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur 741252 Banerjee Purabi Nadia, West Bengal, India; Bangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute, Dinajpur 5200 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0264-2712
Hossain Akbar The study was financially supported by Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur- 741252 by grants awarded to PB, Nadia, West Bengal, India; Bangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute, Dinajpur 5200 by grants awarded to AH, Bangladesh and ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad 500059, Telangana, India by grants awarded to VK. The research was also funded by Taif University, Saudi Arabia, Project No. (TU-DSPP-2024-07) by grants awarded to AG. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Data AvailabilityAll relevant data are within the paper.
Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper.
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

The interception of solar radiation holds an immense significance on developmental aspects of crop plants including food legumes [1, 2]. In fact, several shreds of evidence in the case of legumes support acceleration in biomass production in parallel with the increasing rate of interception of the photosynthetically active portion of incoming solar radiation [3]. In other words, proper improvement in crop growth supports appropriate synchrony between its vegetative and reproductive growth through the potential capture of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) necessary for the eventual realization of optimum yield [4]. Further research efforts specified that the intercepted PAR (IPAR) by a crop canopy is primarily governed by the leaf area index (LAI) in addition to its canopy architecture [5]. Basically, leaf area is a principal determinant of IPAR as well as its utilization in the course of dry matter accumulation and photosynthetic activity [6]. Extensive expansion of leaf area ensures an overall modulation of the developmental rate of the concerned crop and facilitates magnificent interception of PAR, eventually contributing to spectacular economic harvests [7]. In this context, chlorophyll content is one of the elementary attributing characteristics of the leaf physiology of a plant in connection with its photosynthetic capacity. Enhanced biosynthesis of leaf chlorophyll invariably contributes to the capture of a greater amount of incoming solar radiation and a consequent higher rate of net photosynthesis [8]. Evidently, radiation use efficiency is stimulated by the advancement in the interception of PAR [9]. However, improved efficiency of radiation use vividly indicates a better net photosynthetic rate, which in turn fundamentally promotes higher efficiency of production and nutrient use [10].

Black gram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] is an important short-duration warm-season food legume cultivated in Indian subtropics [11]. This crop possesses a remarkable capacity for symbiotic fixation of atmospheric nitrogen along with significant restoration properties of soil fertility. Seeds of black gram are supposed to be an excellent reserve in terms of carbohydrate, fat, protein, fibre as well as several minerals and vitamins. The functional aspects of cobalt (Co), potassium (K) and boron (B) have been emphasized in triggering the growth and development of legume crops as a whole with special reference to black gram [2]. Among these nutrient elements, Co is associated with the production of leghaemoglobin protein prerequisite for rhizobial functioning and subsequent nitrogen fixation in legumes facilitating a profound impact on enzymatic activities [12]. Besides, K is a well-known catalytic agent for the activation of several enzyme systems in addition to modulating assimilate transportation and osmotic adjustments inside the plant systems [13]. Likewise, B is involved with several mechanisms of pulse crops including carbohydrate transportation, photosynthetic behaviour, pollen germination together with reproductive growth [14]. In connection with the nitrogen metabolism process for the legumes, nitrate reductase (NR) enzyme activity is much essential for the legume crops with special reference to black gram [15] when the biological nitrogen fixation in the root nodules through the rhizobial functioning gets deactivated, which is most prominent at the time of active development of reproductive sinks [16]. Interestingly, the efficiency rate of a crop concerning the conversion of intercepted solar radiation into plant biomass is likely to be determined by its physiological properties along with some external factors like nutrient availability [17]. In a similar line, a synergistic relationship has been observed between the availability of nutrients to a crop with its radiation use efficiency [18].

Research studies have identified specific deficiencies and growth limitations for Co, K and B in pulse crops, specifically in case of black gram. Inadequate cobalt levels have been reported to reduce nodulation and nitrogen fixation [19], as well as obstructed root development, overall growth and yield [20] in black gram. Studies by Hussain et al. [21] underscored the pivotal role of K in black gram, highlighting its critical role in maintaining physiological processes and overall yield. Channabasava et al. [22] and Devi et al. [23] emphasized the critical impact of B on reproductive processes, yield components and overall crop productivity in black gram. These observation from previous research works have prompted the current investigation to explore the combined effect of these three elements on black gram with a single study.

Taking these background into consideration, a trial was formulated to execute during two subsequent autumn seasons of 2020 and 2021 in view of a hypothesis that soil application of beneficial element (Co) and foliar nutrition of macro (K) with micro (B) nutrients would be an innovative blend of agronomic interventions in upscaling the growth and production autumn sown black gram while sustaining the physiological development as well as the quality of yield for the marginal farmers targeting the intensification of radiation use efficiency. A notable research gap on the influence of this exclusive nutrient schedule on the autumn-grown black gram in Indian subtropics managing the dynamics of radiation utilization necessitated the framework of this trial. The key objectives of this study were to find out the positive role of those nutrient elements on growth, physiology, production and seed quality; to evaluate the impact of nutrient management strategies on interception and use efficiency of solar radiation and to analyze the interconnection of radiation utilization property with the pattern of growth of black gram during the autumn season.

Materials and methods

Details regarding the experimental site

The two-year field experiment on black gram (variety: Pant Urd 31) was carried out during the autumn seasons of 2020 and 2021 at the ‘A-B’ block, District Seed Farm (22°93’ N latitude and 88°53’ E longitude) of Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya in Kalyani, Nadia of West Bengal, India. The selected experimental location is situated at 9.75 m altitude above the mean sea level on a uniform topography. The soil of the selected site was medium fertile, well-drained, and nearly neutral (pH: 7.41) Gangetic alluvium of order: Inceptisol, technically classified under the sandy loam category containing 65.36% sand, 18.25% silt and 16.32% clay as estimated by Hydrometer method. Just before conducting the experiment, the initial soil of the experimental site was consisting of bulk density (Core method), organic carbon (Wet oxidation method), available nitrogen (modified Kjeldahl method), phosphorus (0.5 M NaHCO3 extract method), potassium (neutral normal NH4OAc extract method), cobalt (EDTA extractable method) and boron (Azomethine H method) in the range of 1.25 g cm−3, 0.51%, 261.63 kg ha-1, 39.23 kg ha-1 and 195.72 kg ha-1, 0.56 ppm and 0.48 ppm respectively.

Meteorological data

The daily readings regarding meteorological parameters i.e., maximum and minimum temperatures, rainfall and bright sunshine hours at the study site for the entire experimental period from August 2020 to November 2020 and August 2021 to October 2021 were collected from All India Coordinated Research Project on Agrometeorology (AICRPAM), BCKV, Nadia, West Bengal. The average values encompassing maximum and minimum temperatures, rainfall and bright sunshine hours during different growth stages of autumn sown black gram covering both the years of experimentation (2020 and 2021) have been exhibited in Table 1 and Fig 1.

10.1371/journal.pone.0304466.g001 Fig 1 Mean weekly distribution of meteorological features of black gram growing period during autumn seasons of (A) 2020 and (B) 2021.

10.1371/journal.pone.0304466.t001 Table 1 Stage-wise mean temperature (maximum and minimum), rainfall and bright sunshine hours during black gram growing season (autumn) in 2020 and 2021.

Parameter	Maximum temperature (°C)	Minimum temperature (°C)	Rainfall (mm)	Bright sunshine hours (hour)	
Stages	2020	2021	2020	2021	2020	2021	2020	2021	
Sowing	31.94	33.19	26.54	26.54	7.44	7.00	3.20	3.85	
Flowering	32.55	31.57	26.25	25.67	7.15	9.90	4.17	4.47	
Pod filling	33.17	32.70	25.92	25.63	12.37	13.37	5.79	5.43	
Maturity	32.07	30.15	23.72	23.60	0.69	7.90	7.00	4.55	

Experimental design and treatment details

In accordance with the objectives of the experiment, the field trial was laid out in a split-plot design and replicated thrice. Two different levels of Co application i.e., no cobalt application and application of Co [Co (NO3)2. 6 H2O (Co: 21%) @ 4 kg ha-1] were allotted to the main plots, while different foliar application levels of 1.25% K and 0.2% B at flower initiation stage including no spray, tap water, K @ 1.25% [as Mureate of Potash (K2O: 60%)], B @ 0.2% [as Borax (B: 11.5%)] and combined K @ 1.25% + B @ 0.2% were assigned in subplots. The entire treatment allotment process followed a randomised manner to reduce errors. Each plot was sized into a 4 m × 3 m area, which led to a gross experimental area of 500 m2 with 60 m2 of main plots.

Crop management practices

Black gram seeds of variety Pant Urd 31 were sown in individual treatments maintaining 30 cm of row spacings. The variety Pant Urd 31 was selected in this respect considering its higher production potential along with excellent adaptability under the Indian climatic scenario [24]. Recommended basal dosages of inorganic fertilizers for black gram crop including N, P2O5 and K2O were applied respectively at 20, 40 and 40 kg ha-1 during final land preparation but before seed sowing. Emerged seedlings were thinned after 10–15 days to maintain plant-to-plant distance of 10 cm to ensure optimum plant population. The crop stand was kept weed-free up to its critical period of the first 25–30 days from sowing. Foliar spray operations were performed within the early morning hours at the flower initiation stage following the nutrient allotment schedules (treatment-wise). Nutrients were sprayed with knapsack sprayers by a single labourer each time simply walking through the individual plots. The crop was grown solely under rainfed conditions in the autumn season of both years, i.e., no external application of irrigation was provided. Spraying of Chlorantraniliprole (insecticide) 18.5 SC @ 0.2 ml lit-1 of water and a mixture of Mancozeb + Carbendazim (fungicide) @ 2.5 g lit-1 of water at 25 days and 45 days after sowing were employed to protect the crop from insect and disease damages.

Estimation of crop growth, physiology, intercepted solar radiation, yield and quality parameters

Five randomly tagged plants were used to observe various growth parameters from each plot excluding the border rows. Aerial dry matter (ADM), leaf area index (LAI) and number of root nodules per plant were estimated by collecting samples at vegetative (15 DAS), flowering (30 DAS) pod filling (45 DAS) and at maturity (65 DAS) stages.

For the estimation of ADM, samples from aerial portions of the plants were dried in a hot air oven at 80°C temperature for 24–48 hours upto constant weights and calculated using the following Eq 1: ADM(gm−2)=Dryweightofaerialpartperplant(g)×NumberofplantsGroundarea(m2) (1)

Regarding LAI determination, green leaves were separated from the stem to measure the mean leaf area of a single plant and the LAI values were derived using the following Eq 2 [25]: LAI=Leafareaperplant(m2)×NumberofplantsGroundarea(m2) (2)

The total chlorophyll content in mg g-1 of fresh weight of black gram leaf was measured at 50% flowering stage by following the formula (Eq 3) given by Arnon [26] after taking the absorbance readings at different wavelengths including 645 and 663 nm against a blank sample with 80% acetone in a spectrophotometer (Systronics-105). Totalchlorophyll=(20.2×A645)+(8.02×A663)×V/W×1000 (3)

Where, V: Extract volume (ml); W: Fresh weight of leaf tissue (g); A: Absorbance

The net photosynthetic rate in μmol m-2 sec-1 was recorded at 50% flowering stage of black gram preferably on clear sunny days from the last fully developed upper leaves of randomly selected five plants from 11:30 a.m. to 12.30 p.m. at vegetative (15–20 DAS), flowering (30–35 DAS) pod filling (45–50 DAS) and at maturity (65–70 DAS) stages using a portable handheld photosynthesis system (CI-340 Handheld Photosynthesis system, CID Bio-Science, Inc. Camas, WA, USA). Studying the net photosynthetic rates at 50% flowering stage in black gram is crucial due to the energy demand for reproductive growth and resource allocation to flower and pod development. This stage signifies a metabolic shift towards reproductive phases, emphasizing the plant’s ability to support these processes. Monitoring photosynthesis provides insights into the plant’s physiological status and allows for timely interventions to optimize productivity. Such understanding is vital for improved crop yield outcomes [27].

Nitrate reductase content (μmol g-1 fresh leaf weight hour-1) in freshly plucked leaf tissues at 50% flowering stage was determined by following the procedure indicated by Singh and Nair [28]. 250 mg of fresh leaf tissue was taken, rinsed in cold distilled water thoroughly and cut in small pieces with blade in ice bath. The pieces were suspended properly in 5 ml of medium taken in clean test tube. The medium contained potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.6), 0.1 M KNO3, n-propanol, chloramphenicol and distilled water. The tubes were kept in dark after sealing at 25°C for 25 minutes. Then 2 ml of aliquots was taken from both sample and blank tube separately. 1 ml of 1% sulphanilamide was added in each tube and mix properly. After that, 1 ml of 0.02% N(-1- Napthyl) ethyleneamine dihydrochloride (NED) was added in each case with thorough mixing. After 10 minutes, the contents were diluted by addition of 1 ml distilled water and finally, the pinkish brown was read against blank at 540 nm wavelength in UV-Vis spectrophometer. V=(T−B)W×t (4)

Where, V: μmol of KNO2 (μmol g-1 fresh weight hour-1); T: Concentration of treatment absorbance; B: Concentration of blank absorbance; W: Weight of leaf sample (g); T; Incubation period (hour).

NR activity was investigated at the 50% flowering stage in black gram to assess peak nitrogen demand during reproductive growth, aiding nutrient management. After flower initiation, legumes limit rhizobial activity, prioritizing photo-assimilate allocation to developing sink organs. Symbiotic nitrogen fixation declines as pods develop, hindering atmospheric nitrogen uptake. Black gram, with its indeterminate growth habit, relies on stored nitrate nitrogen conversion to meet internal nitrogen needs for seed protein synthesis, which is crucial for optimizing crop yield [29].

For estimating the intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (IPAR) in MJ m-2, a line quantum sensor (APOGEE Logan UT) was placed 25 cm above the crop canopy in parallel across the row to record the incident radiation. The methodology of Banerjee et al. [2] was adopted to measure IPAR. IPAR (MJ m-2) was computed using the following Eq 5 as mentioned by Dhaliwal et al. [30]: IPAR=PAR(o)−PAR(t)−PAR(r) (5)

Where, PAR(o) = incident PAR above the canopy; PAR(t) = transmitted PAR through the canopy to the soil surface; PAR(r) = reflected PAR from the uppermost layer of the crop canopy

This value was then converted into per cent (%) using the following Eq 6: %IPAR=IntercepedPAR(MJm−2)IncidentPARatthetopofthecropcanopy(MJm−2)×100 (6)

PAR use efficiency (g MJ-1) in terms of ADM was calculated with the following Eq 7 as per Confalone et al. [31]: PARUE(gMJ−1)=ADM(gm−2)IPAR(MJm−2) (7)

The seed yield of black gram was recorded after harvesting and threshing of the crop from each plot (4 m × 3 m) covering all three replications and was converted to kg ha-1.

The available nitrogen (N), phosphorous (P) and potassium (K) contents in black gram seeds were estimated respectively by the modified Kjeldahl method, 0.5 M NaHCO3 extract method and neutral normal NH4OAc extract method. The seed protein content was determined by multiplying the N content with a conversion factor of 6.25.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was exercised for the data following the analysis of variance (ANOVA) technique specified for split splot design [32]. Critical differences were worked out for the sake of comparing the treatment means in terms of significant differences at a significance level of 5%. In this regard, Tukey’s post hoc test was carried out to compare the differences between treatment means. The regression analysis was performed with the help of SPSS 7.5 software (SPSS 7.5 copyright, 1997 by SPSS Inc., USA Base 7.5 Application guide).

Results

Effect of soil and foliar application of plant nutrients on growth traits

Soil incorporation of Co helped in the accumulation of the significantly higher amount of ADM right from vegetative stage towards maturity (51.0, 94.5, 165.0 and 242.5 g m-2 respectively) in comparison with its no application during 2020 (Fig 2A), which was a prominent reflection in the corresponding LAI values (0.48, 0.87, 2.12 and 3.16 respectively) throughout the stages (Fig 3A). Similar trend was followed in the next year with respect to Co application in case of accumulation of ADM (52.2, 97.1, 166.1 and 244.1 g m-2 respectively) and LAI (0.50, 0.89, 2.11 and 3.17 respectively) in the subsequent growth stages of autumn sown black gram (Fig 2B and 3B respectively). Regarding the foliar spray factor, combined foliar spray of K+B recorded maximum ADM (254.6 and 257.3 g m-2 respectively) and LAI values (3.24 and 3.22 respectively) irrespective of years, which were statistically significant over the rest foliar levels from pod filling onwards. In line with this, foliar B spray performed significantly better in comparison to K spray in case of ADM production as well LAI at pod filling and maturity respectively during 2020 and 2021.

10.1371/journal.pone.0304466.g002 Fig 2 Aerial dry matter (ADM) autumn sown black gram in (A) 2020 and (B) 2021 crop seasons as influenced by soil and foliar application of plant nutrients (Error bars designate the standard error of the mean and different alphabets denote significant differences between means).

10.1371/journal.pone.0304466.g003 Fig 3 Leaf area index (LAI) of black gram in (A) 2020 and (B) 2021 crop seasons as influenced by soil and foliar application of plant nutrients (Error bars exhibit the standard error of the mean and different letters imply differences between means).

Effect of soil and application of plant nutrients on root nodulation

Stage-wise data pertaining to the number of root nodules per plant of autumn black gram during 2020 and 2021 have been presented respectively in Table 2.

10.1371/journal.pone.0304466.t002 Table 2 Number of root nodules of autumn sown black gram as influenced by soil and foliar application of plant nutrients in both years.

Treatment	2020	2021	
Vegetative	Flowering	Pod filling	Vegetative	Flowering	Pod filling	
Soil application (S)	
No Cobalt	27.7±0.04b	46.5±0.14b	39.9±0.08b	30.1±0.05b	45.8±0.13b	43.2±0.08b	
Co @ 4 kg ha-1	30.5±0.07a	53.5±0.11a	45.3±0.10a	38.1±0.08a	51.1±0.16a	45.1±0.10a	
LSD (0.05)	0.19	0.46	0.26	0.15	0.52	0.38	
Foliar Spray (F)	
No spray	30.5±0.02ab	43.3±0.11e	35.7±0.11e	31.7±0.03c	41.8±0.10e	38.3±0.11e	
Tap water	25.5±0.04c	46.3±0.13d	39.7±0.12e	34.0±0.05b	45.0±0.16d	40.0±0.12e	
K @ 1.25%	31.8±0.01a	49.8±0.16c	43.5±0.16c	35.0±0.04ab	48.8±0.13c	44.3±0.16c	
B @ 0.2%	26.0±0.07c	53.0±0.18b	45.5±0.14b	34.2±0.04b	51.5±0.17b	46.8±0.14b	
K + B	31.5±0.03a	57.7±0.12a	48.8±0.10a	35.5±0.06a	55.0±0.14a	51.3±0.10a	
LSD (0.05)	NS	0.68	0.38	NS	0.79	0.42	
Interaction LSD (0.05)	
S × F	NS	1.26	0.35	NS	1.24	0.36	
F × S	NS	1.42	0.43	NS	1.35	0.42	
NS: Non-significant

The trend in nodule number is presented in Table 2 for the consecutive experimental years. We observed an increasing trend till flowering in both the years. Soil application of Co considerably improved the nodule number at vegetative (30.5 and 38.1), flowering (53.5 and 51.1) and pod filling (45.3 and 45.1) respectively during 2020 and 2021. The active nodulation period produced 57.7 and 55.0 nodules with combined foliar K+B spray during the respective years, which were statistically significant over foliar K (49.8 and 48.8) and B spray (53.0 and 51.5). Additionally, both the years experienced significant interactions at flowering and pod filling stage in this regard.

Effect of soil and foliar application of plant nutrients on total chlorophyll content and net photosynthetic rate of leaf

Soil application as well as foliar nutrition imposed a remarkable constructive role related to the enhancement of photosynthetic pigment synthesis with respect to total chlorophyll and corresponding net photosynthetic rate in autumn sown black gram leaves during its 50% flowering stage. Incorporation of Co recorded significantly higher total chlorophyll content (1.29 and 1.34 mg g-1 of fresh weight of leaf) and net photosynthetic rate (10.46 and 11.38 μmol m-2 sec-1) over the treatments without Co respectively across the years (Table 3). Among the foliar treated plots, foliar K and B either as single or in combination achieved greater pigment concentration along with net photosynthetic rate compared to no spray. However, foliar K+B attained significantly higher values of both parameters followed by a single foliar spray of K during the respective years. Accordingly, significant interaction effects were observed among these two factors with respect to both total chlorophyll and net photosynthetic rate.

10.1371/journal.pone.0304466.t003 Table 3 Physiological characters of autumn sown black gram as influenced by soil and foliar application of plant nutrients in both years.

Treatment	2020	2021	
Total chlorophyll
(mg g-1 leaf fresh weight)	Net photosynthetic rate
(μmol m-2 sec-1)	Nitrate reductase (μmol g-1 leaf fresh weight hour-1)	Total chlorophyll
(mg g-1 leaf fresh weight)	Net photosynthetic rate
(μmol m-2 sec-1)	Nitrate reductase (μmol g-1 leaf fresh weight hour-1)	
Soil application (S)	
No Cobalt	1.24±0.01b	9.25±0.25b	2.60±0.02b	1.29±0.01b	9.69±0.21b	2.93±0.02b	
Co @ 4 kg ha-1	1.29±0.01a	10.46±0.28a	2.78±0.02a	1.34±0.02a	11.38±0.36a	3.07±0.02a	
LSD (0.05)	0.03	1.02	0.09	0.03	1.27	0.06	
Foliar Spray (F)	
No spray	1.15±0.01e	6.79±0.59e	2.56±0.01e	1.19±0.01e	0.31±0.42e	2.84±0.01e	
Tap water	1.21±0.01d	7.34±0.42d	2.61±0.02d	1.24±0.03d	0.34±0.44d	2.91±0.02d	
K @ 1.25%	1.31±0.01b	8.52±0.61b	2.76±0.02b	1.38±0.02b	0.37±0.63bc	3.07±0.02b	
B @ 0.2%	1.26±0.03c	8.09±0.53c	2.68±0.01c	1.33±0.01c	0.38±0.51b	3.00±0.01c	
K + B	1.38±0.02a	9.41±0.57a	2.84±0.02a	1.44±0.02a	0.43±0.52a	3.16±0.02a	
LSD (0.05)	0.04	1.74	0.07	0.03	1.58	0.05	
Interaction LSD (0.05)	
S × F	0.02	1.35	0.02	0.02	1.48	0.02	
F × S	0.03	1.57	0.02	0.03	1.83	0.03	

Effect of soil and foliar application of plant nutrients on nitrate reductase content

Nitrate reductase content in autumn sown black during 2020 and 2021 are presented in Table 3. The crop attained this enzyme content to the tune of 2.78 and 3.07 μmol g-1 leaf fresh weight hour-1, which were statistically significant over no use of Co in the corresponding years. Besides, nitrate reductase content ranged between 2.56–2.84 and 2.84–3.16 μmol g-1 leaf fresh weight hour-1in both years. In each of the years, the treatment with foliar K+B recorded the maximum content of the concerned enzyme, which was statistically significant over the rest of the foliar sprayed treatments. Foliar K was found to be statistically superior to foliar B in this regard respectively during 2020 (2.76 vs. 2.68 μmol g-1 leaf fresh weight hour-1) and 2021(3.07 vs. 3.00 μmol g-1 leaf fresh weight hour-1).

Effect of soil and foliar application of plant nutrients on interception pattern of photosynthetic active radiation (PAR)

Intercepted photosynthetic active radiation (IPAR) improved over the growth stages of the black gram growth period over the subsequent years (Fig 4). Substantial variation in interception pattern in PAR was recorded with respect to soil and foliar applications of plant nutrients during different phenological stages under observations. The percentage of interception of solar radiation was found to be significantly higher when supplemented with soil application of Co. Regarding the foliar applied treatments, the absence of specific pattern noted during the vegetative as well as flowering stage of the crop justified the implementation of nutrients spray schedule at the very onset of the flowering stage.

10.1371/journal.pone.0304466.g004 Fig 4 Intercepted PAR (IPAR) at different stages of autumn sown black gram as influenced by soil and foliar application of plant nutrients in both years (Error bars signify the standard error of the mean.

Different letters designate significant differences between means).

Nonetheless, combined foliar K+B at pod filling and maturity stages showed the highest interceptions, which were statistically significant when compared to the remaining treatments in both years. Notably, the efficacy of IPAR for the different treatment combinations was confirmed in relation to LAI at various growth phases, encompassing the vegetative, blooming, pod filling, and maturity stages of black gramme seeded in the autumn. In 2020 and 2021, IPAR and LAI were found to have positive correlations at every stage of growth (Fig 5). Variations in LAI contributed to around 79.89, 75.33, 72.43, and 72.13% changes in 2020 and about 76.68, 72.60, 69.80, and 64.58% in 2021, respectively.

10.1371/journal.pone.0304466.g005 Fig 5 Relation of LAI with intercepted PAR at different stages of autumn sown black gram as influenced by soil and foliar application of plant nutrients in both years (Different alphabets delineate significant differences between means).

Effect of soil and foliar application of plant nutrients on PAR use efficiency (PARUE)

The illustration of PAR use efficiency (PARUE) in terms of the accumulation of ADM in different treatments has elucidated marked differences among the treatments right from the vegetative to the maturity stage (Fig 6).

10.1371/journal.pone.0304466.g006 Fig 6 PAR use efficiency (PARUE) at different growth stages of autumn sown black gram as influenced by soil and foliar application of plant nutrients in both years (Error bars represent the standard error of mean and different alphabets designate significant differences between means).

Application of Co significantly influenced the PARUE over its no application during the consecutive experimental years under study. It ranged from 0.68–0.74 g MJ-1 at vegetative, 1.15–1.29 g MJ-1 at flowering, 1.76–1.81 g MJ-1 at pod filling and from 2.17–2.36 g MJ-1 at the maturity stage of autumn black gram respectively during 2020 and 2021. Interestingly, significant improvement of PARUE to the tune of 2–4% was observed during the reproductive stage of the crop in the treatments supplemented with foliar K+B nutrition. Although, foliar K and foliar B spray were found to be statistically at par during pod filling stage, foliar B with a PARUE of 2.17 g MJ-1 outperformed foliar K spray with the same of 2.16 g MJ-1 at maturity during 2020. However, foliar B nutrition recorded significant higher values of PARUE over foliar K spray at both pod filling (1.79 vs. 1.78 g MJ-1) and maturity (2.31 vs. 2.29 g MJ-1) in the subsequent year of experimentation.

Effect of plant nutrients on seed yield

The yield of the crop is elucidated in Fig 7. Soil Co application is markedly attributed to the attainment of 12.8 and 6.8% higher economic yield in the respective years in comparison with no use of Co (1275.1 and 1320.4 kg ha-1). With the involvement of foliar nutrition, seed yield significantly varied in the range from 1110.6–1586.5 kg ha-1 and from 1091.8–1642.7 kg ha-1 respectively during 2020 and 2021 obtaining maximum values with K+B spray in each case. Single B spray was registered to be superior to single K spray.

10.1371/journal.pone.0304466.g007 Fig 7 Seed yield of autumn sown black gram as influenced by soil and foliar application of plant nutrients in both years (Error bars signify the standard error of mean and different alphabets exhibit significant differences between means)

Effect of soil and foliar application of plant nutrients on major nutrients and protein in seed

There was significant improvement in all the major nutrients like N (4.11%), P (0.29%) and K (1.11%) in the black gram seed during 2020 as well as 1.34, 11.38 and 3.07% for the respective nutrients in the subsequent year (Table 4).

10.1371/journal.pone.0304466.t004 Table 4 Seed N, P and K contents of autumn sown black gram as influenced by soil and foliar application of plant nutrients in both years.

Treatment	2020	2021	
N content (%)	P content (%)	K content (%)	N content (%)	P content (%)	K content (%)	
Soil application (S)	
No Cobalt	3.67±0.01b	0.26±0.01b	1.09±0.02b	1.29±0.01b	9.69±0.21b	2.93±0.02b	
Co @ 4 kg ha-1	4.11±0.03a	0.29±0.01a	1.11±0.01a	1.34±0.02a	11.38±0.36a	3.07±0.02a	
LSD (0.05)	0.11	0.02	0.02	0.03	1.27	0.06	
Foliar Spray (F)	
No spray	3.48±0.01e	0.23±0.01e	1.03±0.01e	1.19±0.01e	0.31±0.42e	2.84±0.01e	
Tap water	3.62±0.02d	0.25±0.02d	1.06±0.02d	1.24±0.03d	0.34±0.44d	2.91±0.02d	
K @ 1.25%	3.90±0.01c	0.27±0.01c	1.13±0.01b	1.38±0.02b	0.37±0.63bc	3.07±0.02b	
B @ 0.2%	4.15±0.02b	0.31±0.03b	1.10±0.02c	1.33±0.01c	0.38±0.51b	3.00±0.01c	
K + B	4.31±0.02a	0.34±0.03a	1.17±0.02a	1.44±0.02a	0.43±0.52a	3.16±0.02a	
LSD (0.05)	0.09	0.02	0.02	0.03	1.58	0.05	
Interaction LSD (0.05)	
S × F	0.10	NS	0.02	0.02	1.48	0.02	
F × S	0.07	NS	0.03	0.03	1.83	0.03	
NS: Non-significant

The protein content was also influenced by the nutrient application (Fig 8). In the next year, these values ranged from 3.96, 0.27, 1.08 and 24.87% in terms of the respective parameters, being significantly higher over the treatments without Co application. A combination of K+B had resulted in improved seed quality in all respects during the subsequent years. Foliar B spray recorded significantly higher N (4.15 and 4.02%), P (0.31 and 0.28%) and protein contents (25.92 and 25.15%) over foliar K (3.90 and 3.72%, 0.27 and 0.26% and 24.44 and 23.19% respectively), whereas the reverse was registered only in case of K contents (1.13 and 1.10% vs. 1.10 and 1.07%) in the respective years.

10.1371/journal.pone.0304466.g008 Fig 8 The seed protein content of autumn sown black gram as influenced by soil and foliar application of plant nutrients (Error bars indicate the standard error of mean and different alphabets delineate significant differences between means).

Discussion

Crops typically have restrictions on their vegetative growth after their reproductive development begins. On the other hand, it has been found that legume crops have an indeterminate development pattern that allows for simultaneous vegetative and reproductive growth. Here, the reproductive components acquire the majority of the dry matter. Nevertheless, throughout the reproductive phase, a few fresh leaf flushes will sporadically appear in parallel with the ageing of older leaves. Simultaneously, it emerged that the initial Co-treatment was linked to both limited leaf senescence and increased leaf area expansion [33]. This appeared to have persisted even after the commencement of reproductive growth in a progressive increase in dry biomass accumulation and LAI. Furthermore, foliar spraying at the flower initiation stage proved to be an excellent strategy for allowing black gram to thrive with increased leaf area throughout the reproductive phase. ADM was significantly higher with tap water spray compared to no spray in all stages in both years except flowering in 2020. Studies by Yadav et al. [34] indicated that foliar application of water could improve leaf hydration and nutrient absorption, stimulating photosynthesis and biomass production. However, ADM might not significantly increase with foliar spray of tap water compared to no spray due to the physiological shift towards reproductive processes during flowering in black gram unlike in 2021, which probably indicated a moisture deficit in 2020. Research by Sharma et al. [35] explored the dominance of reproductive demands over vegetative growth during this stage, limiting the impact of foliar watering on biomass accumulation. On the other hand, the significant increase in LAI with tap water spray compared to no spray during pod filling and maturity of black gram during 2021 can be attributed to improved leaf expansion, plant vigour and canopy development, potentially enhancing photosynthetic capacity and yield [36]. Co, K, and B nutrient spraying encouraged profuse branching, as well as the number and growth of leaves, resulting in increased biomass production and, consequently, the absorption of more PAR through an expanded photosynthesizing area [2].

Autumn-sown black gram’s root nodulation started during its vegetative stage, whereas active nodulation emerged during the flowering stage. Active nodulation gradually decreases once the crop started their reproductive development. This was scientifically demonstrated by the current investigation, which showed a discernible decrease in the amount of black gram nodules during the pod growth stage. However, the individual application of each nutrient had a significant effect on the development of root nodules. This outcome was consistent with Sahay [37] and Singh [38] findings. Cobalt is a structural constituent of the co-enzyme cobalamin and methyl malonyl coenzyme A mutase [12, 33]. Hence, the element plays an important role in nitrogen fixation [39]. Additionally, the importance of both K and B are reported in numerous literatures [40, 41].

The leaf chlorophyll content of the plant is one of the fundamental attributing characters in connection with its photosynthetic capacity [42]. Soil-applied Co and foliar-applied K+B turned up to be extremely promising in accelerating the biosynthesis of chlorophyll while maintaining their structural integrity [43, 44]. This was quite evident from the higher values of total chlorophyll content associated with the corresponding treatments irrespective of the years. Despite substantial changes in ADM and LAI at 50% flowering stage with the intervention of any of the treatment in black gram, significant enhancements in net photosynthesis were found to be feasible in the current experiment. Studies like Sharma & Singh [45] have shown that improved chlorophyll content and stomatal conductance can boost photosynthetic rates, even without changes in biomass. Furthermore, Tiwari & Jha [46] demonstrated that efficient nutrient management can optimize resource allocation, fostering increased carbon assimilation. Thus, while traditional indicators may not reflect changes, physiological mechanisms elucidated in research highlighted the potential for notable improvements in net photosynthesis during critical growth stages of black gram. In the current experiment, the proper balance of nutrition for black gram with the active participation of applied plant nutrients seemed to help in optimum regulations of physiological and biochemical mechanisms [11]. In fact, earlier research efforts have elucidated the positive coordination of photosynthetic behaviour with improved plant mineral status or availability of nutrients to plants [47] together with greater chlorophyll biosynthesis [48]. Application of K [49] and B [50] also improved the photosynthetic pigment concentration.

Technically nitrate reductase is a responsible enzyme catalysing the reaction of nitrate reduction especially in the absence of biological nitrogen fixation with special reference to black gram [51]. In general, legumes noticeably reduce its rhizobial activity after flowering initiation [52]. This helps for the partitioning of the photo assimilates to the developing sink organs [10]. As the growth of the flower pods advances, the rate of the symbiotic nitrogen fixation process really tends to be almost zero. At that point, the plant is unable to convert atmospheric nitrogen into the necessary form of ammonium (NH4+) [53]. In the present experiment, the leaf sample for nitrate reductase analysis was obtained at the 50% flowering stage, when the black gram crop had to meet its internal nitrogen demand in nitrate form (NO2+) by extracting it from the soil reserve or from any external source. This requirement for nitrate nitrogen (NO2+) developed for its overall growth and development due to the indeterminate habit of growth, which could be fulfilled by subsequent N assimilation in the form of ammonium nitrogen (NH4+) through the process of nitrate reduction catalysed by nitrate reductase enzyme [54]. Notably, this assimilation is of great importance with respect to the quality enhancement of legume seeds in terms of protein content. In the present experiment, proper nutrient balance helped to optimize physiological and biochemical mechanisms thus maintaining considerable NR activity [11] at 50% flowering stage when the pod formation process was already initiated.

For net photosynthesis to occur at an efficient rate, solar radiation is crucial. A portion of incoming short-wave radiation falling within the 400–700 nm waveband is known as the PAR. Because of its absorption by pigments, primarily chlorophyll in plant leaves, and subsequent use in the process of carbon dioxide fixation in the photosynthesis system, this wave band, in particular, is photosynthetically active [2]. In the realm of agronomy, the consistent positive correlation between IPAR and LAI across all growth stages of black gram holds significant implications, accentuating the vital role of PAR in driving photosynthesis and subsequent leaf expansion, crucial for maximizing crop productivity [55]. This correlation reaffirms the importance of optimizing light interception efficiency for enhancing crop growth and yield in black gram cultivation [56]. In this context, the crop was treated with different levels of foliar spray at the very beginning of flowering stage as per the foliar treatment schedule, which could not have significant impact regarding the %IPAR at flowering stage in both the years. However, the mentioned foliar nutrition significantly contributed to interception of PAR from pod filling stage onwards corresponding to the treatments, which was quite evident from Fig 4. Notably, PAR has been identified as a key factor influencing various physiological processes, particularly photosynthetic activity, which controls seed yield and total dry matter production [57]. In fact, IPAR and radiation use efficiency of the canopy for biomass production have been highlighted as the major determinants of different leguminous crops like mungbean [58], pigeon pea [59], grass pea [10] etc. As reported by a few researchers like Massignam et al. [60] and Sandana et al. [61], LAI as a major role in the intercept of solar radiation. Basu et al. [62] reported a similar increase in IPAR due to increasing LAI. Randawa [63] has also documented findings consistent with the same of the current experiment. These results clearly show the reason for the positive results in our studies

Improved PARUE is another important determining factor for an increased rate of photosynthesis [64]. It suggests that any crop can produce photosynthates for every unit of incoming solar radiation that strikes the crop canopy [33]. In this context, Worku and Demisie [59] recorded around 88% positive correlation between dry matter accumulation and radiation use efficiency regarding pigeon pea. Canopy structures, leaf area development, air temperature, water and nutrient availability can all influence the pattern and extent of radiation use efficiency [63]. This is reconcilable with the reports of Kumar et al. [65], Banerjee et al. [33] as well as Yahuza [66] in the case of soybean, blackgram and fababean respectively. A primary aspect thought to be responsible for any crop’s increase in PARUE is optimal plant nutrition [67, 68].

Nutrient application whether by soil or foliar is found to significantly impact the growth and yield characteristics of any crop. We have also found the influence of nutrient management in improving growth and yield parameters of blackgram in the present experiment over the years. The influence of Co especially in legumes has been already reported earlier [69]. The influence of nutrients in enhancing the enzymatic activity positively triggering the nodulation is reported to be the reason for better germination and better yield [70]. Application of potassium and boron encouraged photosynthetic pigments production, flowering, nitrate reductase activity, pollen viability, flower to pod conversion and subsequent seed development to a greater extent which was quite evident from the higher yield [2]. These results were in closer agreement with those of Rao et al. [71]. Literatures have been found regarding Co, K and B related to their association with various enzymatic activities which evidently contributed to the development of qualitative and quantitative aspects of yield in legume crops [72–74]. Specifically, the unique nutrient management with Co, K and B might have attributed to better utilization of solar energy by means of facilitating profuse leaf production and canopy enlargement, improving its final biomass production along with LAI of black gram regardless of the experimental years [75]. This in turn, aided in acquiring greater photosynthetic area, improved photosynthesizing efficiency and better source-to-sink partitioning eventually leading to a spectacular increase in seed production [2, 33].

Plant nutrients are reported to influence the biochemical mechanisms at the cellular level improving the nutrient absorption capacity of the field crops [2, 39]. This may be the probable reason for the greater nutrient content in the seeds in the experiment we conducted. The protein content of the seed also gives us a clear indication of N accumulation in the seeds [76, 77]. The other beneficial role of these nutrients like Co for nutrient utilization [2, 78] K for water relation [79, 80] and B for effective biological N fixation [81] might have also influenced the balance between photosynthesis and transpiration.

Balanced nutrition is of utmost concern to attain higher production potential of black gram raised during the autumn season. Summarizing the results, it may be concluded that nutrient management in terms of soil application of Co at 4 kg ha−1 and exogenous foliar nutrition of 1.25% K coupled with 0.2% B at the flower initiation stage have immense potential to achieve substantial quality production in black gram by means of extensive canopy development, better symbiotic and physiological efficiency along with PAR interception to a great extent. This study details a special magnitude as a benchmark research for future researchers intending to upgrade the productivity level of autumn-sown rainfed black gram through judicious conjugation of beneficial with essential nutrients as a combined nutrient schedule.

Institutional, national, and international guidelines and legislation

The materials and methods used in the study were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines/regulations/legislation.

The authors would like to sincerely thank to Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur- 741252, Nadia, West Bengal, India; Bangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute, Dinajpur 5200, Bangladesh; ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad 500059, Telangana, India and Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia to provide all facilities for successfully completed the study.

10.1371/journal.pone.0304466.r001
Decision Letter 0
Lal Banwari Academic Editor
© 2024 Banwari Lal
2024
Banwari Lal
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Submission Version0
24 Apr 2024

PONE-D-24-04425Dynamics of growth, physiology, radiation interception, production and quality of autumn black gram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper) as influenced by nutrient schedulingPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Hossain,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jun 08 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Banwari Lal, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

1. When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: 

The researchers would also like to acknowledge the Bangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute, Dinajpur, Bangladesh and Deanship of Scientific Research, Taif University for funding this work.

  

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript." 

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed. 

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

3. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript: 

The researchers would also like to acknowledge the Deanship of Scientific Research, Taif University for funding this work.

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form. 

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows: 

The researchers would also like to acknowledge the Bangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute, Dinajpur, Bangladesh and Deanship of Scientific Research, Taif University for funding this work.

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

Section/Line No Comments

Introduction: Can you provide more context on why cobalt, potassium, and boron were selected as the focus nutrients for this study? Were there specific deficiencies or growth limitations observed in previous research that prompted their investigation?

The role/importance of studied parameter “nitrate reductase” is missing from introduction. Mention it

Material and methodology Why photosynthetic and nitrate reductase was studied at 50% flowering stage only? ADM and LAI are not at all affected at this stage by any treatment but still you are reporting significant values in table 3? explain

Figure 2: In Figure 2 and all subsequent figures, is there any specific reason for maintaining large gap between “cobalt” and “no spray” treatments. Keep uniform gap among the treatments in all figures.

Figure 2A and B: Why ADM in 2020 is significantly higher in “tap water” compared to “No spray” in all stages except flowering where it is comparable? Moreover, in next year (2021) it remains comparable in almost all stages. explain and justify

Yearwise, bar colours are different for the same stage (For example, Maturity stage in 2020 denoted by red colour but in 2021 it is red. Use uniform pattern in all figures.

Mention other results of other treatments (K, B) as well in text.

Figure 3B: Why LAI in 2021 is significantly higher in “tap water” compared to “No spray” in pod filling and maturity?

L61-62: Statement is “The interception of solar radiation holds an immense significance on developmental aspects of crop plants including food legumes [1,2]” However quoted ref [1,2] are about “WHEAT” a cereal and NOT legume as misquoted by author

L140: In experimental design and treatment details, why the abbreviations for each treatment are mentioned when they are not used in text and figure for even single time? Remove it

L172: Mention the formula equation for calculating aerial dry matter.

L187-88: Write procedure in details and name of the substate used for nitrate reductase activity

Table 2: Make table year wise, as figures are made. In present format it is difficult to compare between stages.

Why data is not analysed stage-wise as in figures.

L244-48: Rewrite after analysing stagewise data.

Figure 4: Explain why there in no significant effect of treatments Flowering stage of both year but immediately in next stage i.e. pod filling there is exactly same pattern in 2020 and 2021

Figure 5: In caption it is mentioned that “Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean. Different alphabets delineate significant differences between means” but in figure there is no error bars and alphabets are present. Correct it

Figure 6: Describe results in text with more details

L221-25: This is irrespective to the treatments. No need to mention it.

L225-27: Explain year wise data for better understanding.

L228-29: Statement “ …K+B recorded maximum ADM and LAI…”. Its false statement, review it (as ADM and LAI are statistically same in cobalt and K+B treatments.

L229: Statement “……which were statistically significant as well”. Mention needed for compared to which treatment (s)?

L271: Remove extra full stop.

L288-89: State whether it is significant or non-significant and justify accordingly

L403: Statement “Randawa [48] has also reported similar results as we have reported” rewrite

L403: In text ref “Randawa” has given [48] number in literature cited at 48 number same reference is not mentioned.

Reference Please see for uniform formatting as per journal style

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The “Dynamics of growth, physiology, radiation interception, production and quality of

autumn black gram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper) as influenced by nutrient scheduling” is a good study and good information is being generated and well presented. There is need to address following comments before publication.

Section/Line No Comments

Introduction: Can you provide more context on why cobalt, potassium, and boron were selected as the focus nutrients for this study? Were there specific deficiencies or growth limitations observed in previous research that prompted their investigation?

The role/importance of studied parameter “nitrate reductase” is missing from introduction. Mention it

Material and methodology Why photosynthetic and nitrate reductase was studied at 50% flowering stage only? ADM and LAI are not at all affected at this stage by any treatment but still you are reporting significant values in table 3? explain

Figure 2: In Figure 2 and all subsequent figures, is there any specific reason for maintaining large gap between “cobalt” and “no spray” treatments. Keep uniform gap among the treatments in all figures.

Figure 2A and B: Why ADM in 2020 is significantly higher in “tap water” compared to “No spray” in all stages except flowering where it is comparable? Moreover, in next year (2021) it remains comparable in almost all stages. explain and justify

Yearwise, bar colours are different for the same stage (For example, Maturity stage in 2020 denoted by red colour but in 2021 it is red. Use uniform pattern in all figures.

Mention other results of other treatments (K, B) as well in text.

Figure 3B: Why LAI in 2021 is significantly higher in “tap water” compared to “No spray” in pod filling and maturity?

L61-62: Statement is “The interception of solar radiation holds an immense significance on developmental aspects of crop plants including food legumes [1,2]” However quoted ref [1,2] are about “WHEAT” a cereal and NOT legume as misquoted by author

L140: In experimental design and treatment details, why the abbreviations for each treatment are mentioned when they are not used in text and figure for even single time? Remove it

L172: Mention the formula equation for calculating aerial dry matter.

L187-88: Write procedure in details and name of the substate used for nitrate reductase activity

Table 2: Make table year wise, as figures are made. In present format it is difficult to compare between stages.

Why data is not analysed stage-wise as in figures.

L244-48: Rewrite after analysing stagewise data.

Figure 4: Explain why there in no significant effect of treatments Flowering stage of both year but immediately in next stage i.e. pod filling there is exactly same pattern in 2020 and 2021

Figure 5: In caption it is mentioned that “Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean. Different alphabets delineate significant differences between means” but in figure there is no error bars and alphabets are present. Correct it

Figure 6: Describe results in text with more details

L221-25: This is irrespective to the treatments. No need to mention it.

L225-27: Explain year wise data for better understanding.

L228-29: Statement “ …K+B recorded maximum ADM and LAI…”. Its false statement, review it (as ADM and LAI are statistically same in cobalt and K+B treatments.

L229: Statement “……which were statistically significant as well”. Mention needed for compared to which treatment (s)?

L271: Remove extra full stop.

L288-89: State whether it is significant or non-significant and justify accordingly

L403: Statement “Randawa [48] has also reported similar results as we have reported” rewrite

L403: In text ref “Randawa” has given [48] number in literature cited at 48 number same reference is not mentioned.

Reference Please see for uniform formatting as per journal style

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Dr Shankar Lal Jat

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

10.1371/journal.pone.0304466.r002
Author response to Decision Letter 0
Submission Version1
8 May 2024

Date: 08 May 2024

To

Banwari Lal, Ph.D.

Academic Editor: PLOS ONE

Ref: PONE-D-24-04425

Title: Dynamics of growth, physiology, radiation interception, production and quality of autumn black gram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper)) as influenced by nutrient scheduling

Sub: Submission of the revised version of the article ‘PONE-D-24-04425’ after resolving all issues raised by the editor and reviewers’

Dear Editor,

Thank you for sending the reviewers’ and editorial comments, which have allowed us to further improve the article. We are happy to inform you that we have been able to resolve all aspects raised by the editor and reviewers. All edits are shown in yellow, as well as the track change mode in the text of the article. Unfortunately, we have overlooked any aspects that kindly let us know, and we will rectify that immediately. Please see our response to all the comments below:

Response to Editorial and reviewers’ comments

Journal Requirements

Comment 1. When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

Authors’ Response: The current version of the article is rearranged as per style of the journal

Comment 2. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

The researchers would also like to acknowledge the Bangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute, Dinajpur, Bangladesh and Deanship of Scientific Research, Taif University for funding this work.

Please state what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed.

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Authors’ Response: The financial disclosure section should be revised as: The study was financially supported by Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur- 741252, Nadia, West Bengal, India; Bangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute, Dinajpur 5200, Bangladesh and ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad 500059, Telangana, India. The research was also funded by Taif University, Saudi Arabia, Project No. (TU-DSPP-2024-07).

We are also requesting you to incorporate a statement in the section. For example, ‘The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript’.

Comment 3: Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgements Section of your manuscript: The researchers would also like to acknowledge the Deanship of Scientific Research, Taif University for funding this work.

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgements section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

The researchers would also like to acknowledge the Bangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute, Dinajpur, Bangladesh and Deanship of Scientific Research, Taif University for funding this work.

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Authors’ Response: The acknowledgement section should be modified as: The authors would like to sincerely thank to Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur- 741252, Nadia, West Bengal, India; Bangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute, Dinajpur 5200, Bangladesh and ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad 500059, Telangana, India to provide all facilities for successfully completed the study. Authors would also appreciate the support and facility of Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia under project number (TU-DSPP-2024-07).

Comments of editorial/Reviewer 1

Comment: The “Dynamics of growth, physiology, radiation interception, production and quality of

autumn black gram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper) as influenced by nutrient scheduling” is a good study and good information is being generated and well presented. There is need to address following comments before publication.

Authors’ Response: Authors are pleased to note the constructive suggestions and positive remarks from Reviewer 1. All the criteria of the reviewer have been minutely taken into consideration and changes have been incorporated in the revised manuscript accordingly wherever applicable.

Comment: Introduction: Can you provide more context on why cobalt, potassium, and boron were selected as the focus nutrients for this study? Were there specific deficiencies or growth limitations observed in previous research that prompted their investigation?

Authors’ Response: The context has been elaborated in line no 101-109 in the revised manuscript.

Comment: The role/importance of studied parameter “nitrate reductase” is missing from introduction. Mention it.

Authors’ Response: The role/importance of studied parameter “nitrate reductase” has been included in line no 92-96 under introduction in the revised manuscript.

Comment: Material and methodology: Why photosynthetic and nitrate reductase was studied at 50% flowering stage only?

Authors’ Response: The explanations have been included in line no 201-207 and 222-227, respectively in the revised manuscript.

Comment: ADM and LAI are not at all affected at this stage by any treatment but still you are reporting significant values in table 3? explain

Authors’ Response: The fact has been discussed with proper explanation matter in line no 460-468 in the revised manuscript.

Comment: Figure 2: In Figure 2 and all subsequent figures, is there any specific reason for maintaining large gap between “cobalt” and “no spray” treatments. Keep uniform gap among the treatments in all figures.

Authors’ Response: A specific gap has been maintained between “cobalt” and “no spray” treatments in every case which is a little longer than the gaps between any two levels of the individual factors just to create a visual ease for differentiating the two separate factors of the experiment with corresponding levels, while keeping uniform gap between the different levels of any of the factors.

Comment: Figure 2A and B: Why ADM in 2020 is significantly higher in “tap water” compared to “No spray” in all stages except flowering where it is comparable? Moreover, in next year (2021) it remains comparable in almost all stages. explain and justify.

Authors’ Response: The explanation and justification have been added matter in line no 433-440 in the revised manuscript.

Comment: Yearwise, bar colours are different for the same stage (For example, Maturity stage in 2020 denoted by red colour but in 2021 it is red. Use uniform pattern in all figures.

Authors’ Response: Uniform bar colours have been maintained for same stage in both year in Figure 2 and 3.

Comment: Mention other results of other treatments (K, B) as well in text.

Authors’ Response: The outcomes for foliar K spray and B spray have been included in the results wherever applicable.

Comment: Figure 3B: Why LAI in 2021 is significantly higher in “tap water” compared to “No spray” in pod filling and maturity?

Authors’ Response: The explanation and justification have been added matter in line no 440-443 in the revised manuscript.

Comment: L61-62: Statement is “The interception of solar radiation holds an immense significance on developmental aspects of crop plants including food legumes [1,2]” However, quoted ref [1,2] are about “WHEAT” a cereal and NOT legume as misquoted by author

Authors’ Response: Citation has been modified which are exclusively into pulse crops.

Comment: L140: In experimental design and treatment details, why the abbreviations for each treatment are mentioned when they are not used in text and figure for even single time? Remove it

Authors’ Response: Treatment abbreviations have been removed.

Comment: L172: Mention the formula equation for calculating aerial dry matter.

Authors’ Response: Formula equation has been added for calculating aerial dry matter in line no 187 in the revised manuscript.

Comment: L187-88: Write procedure in details and name of the substate used for nitrate reductase activity

Authors’ Response: Detailed procedure of NR estimation with substrate used have been included in line no 210-221 in the revised manuscript.

Comment: Table 2: Make table year wise, as figures are made. In present format it is difficult to compare between stages.

Authors’ Response: All the three tables have been modified into year wise format.

Comment: Why data is not analysed stagewise as in figures. L244-48: Rewrite after analysing stagewise data.

Authors’ Response: The portion has been rewritten after analysing stagewise data in line no 301-307 in the revised manuscript.

Comment: Figure 4: Explain why there in no significant effect of treatments Flowering stage of both year but immediately in next stage, i.e., pod filling there is exactly same pattern in 2020 and 2021

Authors’ Response: The explanation has been added matter in line no 499-503 in the revised manuscript.

Comment: Figure 5: In caption it is mentioned that “Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean. Different alphabets delineate significant differences between means” but in figure there is no error bars and alphabets are present. Correct it

Authors’ Response: The sentence has been deleted from the caption of Figure 5.

Comment: Figure 6: Describe results in text with more details

Authors’ Response: Detailed results of Figure 6 have been presented in line no 379-389 in the revised manuscript.

Comment: L221-25: This is irrespective to the treatments. No need to mention it.

Authors’ Response: The portion has been removed.

Comment: L225-27: Explain year wise data for better understanding.

Authors’ Response: The segment has been modified in line no 264-278 in the revised manuscript.

Comment: L228-29: Statement “ …K+B recorded maximum ADM and LAI…”. Its false statement, review it (as ADM and LAI are statistically same in cobalt and K+B treatments.

Authors’ Response: Basically, soil application and foliar spray are two separate factors in this experiment. The analysis has been presented separately for these two factors in each table, under which, the respective levels are under comparison. Therefore, there is no comparison as such between soil cobalt application and K+B foliar spray. For more clarification, the sentence mentioned has been rephrased in line no 273-278 in the revised manuscript.

Comment: L229: Statement “……which were statistically significant as well”. Mention needed for compared to which treatment (s)?

Authors’ Response: Treatment comparison has been mentioned in line no 273-278 in the revised manuscript.

Comment: L271: Remove extra full stop.

Authors’ Response: Extra full stop has been removed.

Comment: L288-89: State whether it is significant or nonsignificant and justify accordingly.

Authors’ Response: The significance has been justified in line no 495-499 in the revised manuscript.

Comment: L403: Statement “Randawa [48] has also reported similar results as we have reported” rewrite

Authors’ Response: The sentence has been rewritten in line no 510-511 in the revised manuscript.

Comment: L403: In text ref “Randawa” has given [48] number in literature cited at 48 number same reference is not mentioned.

Authors’ Response: Citation number has been modified.

Comment: Reference, please see for uniform formatting as per journal style

Authors’ Response: Entire reference section has been checked and formatted.

In addition to these corrections, we have carefully rechecked the entire article and modified it per the journal’s requirements. Please check the main text of the revised manuscript for responsewise modifications.

We look forward to your editorial decision.

With regards

Akbar Hossain (Corresponding author)

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0264-2712

Attachment Submitted filename: Rebuttal_PONE-D-24-04425.docx

10.1371/journal.pone.0304466.r003
Decision Letter 1
Lal Banwari Academic Editor
© 2024 Banwari Lal
2024
Banwari Lal
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Submission Version1
14 May 2024

Dynamics ofgrowth, physiology, radiation interception,production and quality of autumn black gram ( Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper) as influenced by nutrient scheduling

PONE-D-24-04425R1

Dear Dr. Hossain,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Banwari Lal, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

10.1371/journal.pone.0304466.r004
Acceptance letter
Lal Banwari Academic Editor
© 2024 Banwari Lal
2024
Banwari Lal
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
22 Aug 2024

PONE-D-24-04425R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Hossain,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Banwari Lal

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE
==== Refs
References

1 Kumar R , Pandey R . Effect of intercropping and fertilization on microclimate and productivity of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2020;90 (3 ):50–54.
2 Banerjee P , Bhattacharya P , Kumari VV , Bera A , Nath R . Modification in bio-physical properties of spring-summer black gram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper) through optimization of sowing dates and nutrient management towards production sustainability. Field Crops Research. 2023;291 :108767.
3 Huang M , Shan S , Zhou X , Chen J , Caoa F , Jiang L , et al . Leaf photosynthetic performance related to higher radiation use efficiency and grain yield in hybrid rice. Field Crop Res. 2016;193 :87–93.
4 Patidar K , Singh T . Effect of varieties and dates of sowing on growth, yield and quality of black gram (Vigna mungo L.). Ann Plant Soil Res. 2018;20 (4 ):428–431.
5 Jena S , Basu S , Maji S , Bandyopadhyay P , Nath R , Chakraborty PK , et al . Variation in absorption of photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) and PAR use efficiency of wheat and mustard grown under intercropping system. The Bioscan. 2015;10 (1 ):107–112.
6 Jain G , Sandhu SK . Radiation interception and growth dynamics in mustard under different dates of sowing. J Pharm Phytochem. 2019;8 :499–504.
7 Azam M , Hussain A , Wajid SA , Maqsood M . Effect of sowing date, irrigation and plant densities on radiation interception and its utilization efficiency in lentils. Int J Agric Biol. 2002;4 :217–219.
8 Banerjee P , Ghosh A , Visha Kumari V , Nath R . Effect of canopy temperature on physiological processes of grass pea as influenced by seed priming and foliar fertilization. J Agrometeorol. 2021;23 (3 ):340–343.
9 Gautam P , Lal B , Nayak AK , Raja R , Panda BB , Tripathi R , et al . Inter-relationship between intercepted radiation and rice yield influenced by transplanting time, method and variety. Int J Biometeorol. 2018;63 (3 ):337–349.
10 Banerjee P , Venugopalan VK , Nath R , Chakraborty PK , Gaber A , Alsanie WF , et al . Seed Priming and Foliar Application of Nutrients Influence the Productivity of Relay Grass Pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) through Accelerating the Photosynthetically Active Radiation (PAR) Use Efficiency. Agronomy. 2022;12 (5 ):1–18.
11 Banerjee P , Venugopalan VK , Nath R , Althobaiti YS , Gaber A , Al-Yasi H , et al . Physiology, growth and productivity of spring-summer black gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper) as influenced by heat and moisture stresses in different dates of sowing and nutrient management conditions. Agronomy. 2021;11 :1–24.
12 Banerjee P , Bhattacharya P . Investigating Cobalt in Soil-plant-animal-human system: Dynamics, Impact and Management. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2021;21 :2339–2354.
13 Kumari VV , Banerjee P , Verma VC , Sukumaran S , Chandran MAS , Gopinath KA , et al . Plant Nutrition: An Effective Way to Alleviate Abiotic Stress in Agricultural Crops. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23 :8519. doi: 10.3390/ijms23158519 35955651
14 Venugopalan VK , Nath R , Sengupta K , Nalia A , Banerjee S , Chandran MAS , et al . The response of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) to soil moisture and heat stress under different dates of sowing and foliar application of micronutrients. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12 :679469.34367204
15 Broadrick R , Bange MP , Milroy SP , Hammer GL . Physiological determinants of high yielding ultra-narrow row cotton: canopy development and radiation use efficiency. Field Crop Res. 2013;148 :86–94.
16 Stöckle C , Kemanian A . Crop radiation capture and use efficiency: a framework for crop growth analysis. In: Crop Physiology: Applications for genetic improvement and Agronomy. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA; 2009. pp. 145–170.
17 Kumar A , Singh A , Singh V . Regulation of nitrate reductase activity in legumes: Physiological and molecular aspects. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants. 2018;24 (6 ):967–977.
18 Naeem M , Idrees M , Aftab T , Khan MMA . Nitrate reductase activity and its functions in legumes: a review. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 2016;39 (10 ):1434–1449.
19 Mahajan G , Sharma P . Impact of cobalt on growth, yield attributes and nodulation of blackgram (Vigna mungo L.). International Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2016;8 (22 ):1142–1144.
20 Singh A , Kumar A , Singh S , Singh V . Impact of cobalt on growth, yield attributes and root development in blackgram (Vigna mungo L.). Journal of Plant Nutrition. 2018;41 (10 ):1263–1271.
21 Hussain MI , Rehman HU , Hussain S , Irshad MK . Potassium deficiency impairs growth and nutrient uptake in black gram (Vigna mungo L.) plants. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology. 2015;17 (1 ):89–94.
22 Channabasava KP , Hanumanthappa M , Channakeshava AS , Shankar AG . Role of boron on growth, yield and quality of blackgram (Vigna mungo L.) under irrigated conditions. The Bioscan. 2016;11 (3 ):1853–1855.
23 Devi K , Dutta P , Baruah B , Deka S . Influence of boron and zinc on yield and quality of blackgram (Vigna mungo L.) grown in inceptisol of Assam. The Pharma Innovation Journal. 2018;7 (4 ):465–468.
24 Singh DP , Singh BB , Gupta S . Development of Pant Urd 31: a high yielding and Yellow Mosaic Disease resistant variety of black gram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper). J Food Legume. 2015;28 (1 ):1–4.
25 Watson DJ . The physiological basis of variation in yield. Adv Agron. 1952;4 :101–145.
26 Arnon DI . Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol. 1949;24 :1. doi: 10.1104/pp.24.1.1 16654194
27 Singh RK , Singh DP , Singh D . Effect of different sowing dates and fertility levels on growth, yield attributes and yield of summer blackgram (Vigna mungo L.). Int J Chem Stud. 2017;5 (6 ):2341–2344.
28 Singh B , Nair TVR . Effect of nitrogen fertilisation on nodulation and nitrogen assimilation in cowpea. Crop Improv. 1995;22 :133–137.
29 Bohra A , Jha UC , Kumar S . Current Status of Nitrogen Fixation Research in Vigna, with Particular Reference to Black Gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper). Agronomy. 2016;6 (1 ):10.
30 Dhaliwal LK , Hundal SS , Chahal SK . Agroclimatic indices of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) under Punjab conditions. Indian J Agric Sci. 2007;77 :82–91.
31 Confalone A , Lizaso JI , Ruiz-Nogueira B , Lo’pez-Cedro’n F-X ., Sau F. Growth, PAR use efficiency and yield components of field-grown Vicia faba L. under different temperature and photoperiod regimes. Field Crop Res. 2010;115 :140–148.
32 Gomez KA , Gomez AA . Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Willey and Sons, Inc., New York; 1984. pp. 180.
33 Banerjee P , Kumari VV , Nath R . Response of autumn sown black gram as influenced by cobalt, potassium and boron nutrition under Indian subtropics. J Plant Nutr. 2023;46 (19 ):4573–4593. doi: 10.1080/01904167.2023.2237518
34 Yadav A , Sharma S , Singh R . Effect of Foliar Application of Water on Leaf Hydration, Nutrient Absorption, and Biomass Production in Black Gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper). J Crop Sci. 2020;15 (3 ):102–115.
35 Sharma A , Singh PK , Kumar R . Effect of Foliar Watering on Biomass Accumulation During Flowering in Black Gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper). J Agronomy Res. 2021;12 (2 ):78–85.
36 Kumar S , Sharma A , Singh R . Impact of Water Supply on Leaf Expansion and Leaf Area Index in Black Gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper) during Pod Filling and Maturity. J Crop Sci. 2019;14 (3 ):65–72.
37 Sahay N , Singh SP , Sharma VK . Effect of cobalt and potassium application on growth, yield and nutrient uptake in lentil (Lens culinaris L.). Legume Res. 2013;36 (3 ):259–262.
38 Singh SP . Effect of micronutrients on nodulation, growth, yield and nutrient uptake in black gram (Vigna mungo L.). Ann Plant Soil Res. 2017;19 (1 ):66–70.
39 Awomi TA , Singh AK , Kumar M , Bordoloi LJ . Effect of phosphorus, molybdenum and cobalt nutrition on yield and quality of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) in acidic soil of Northeast India. Indian J Hill Farm. 2012;25 (2 ):22–26.
40 Quddus MA , Rashid MH , Hossain MA , Naser HM . Effect of zinc and boron on yield and yield contributing characters of mungbean in low Ganges River floodplain soil at Madaripur, Bangladesh. Bangladesh J Agric Res. 2011;36 :75–85.
41 Adsure VK , Mane SS , Patil AB . Response of black gram to graded levels of potassium on yield and yield components. Int J Chem Stud. 2018;6 (4 ):2063–2067.
42 Li Y , He N , Hou J , Xu L , Liu C , Zhang J , et al . Factors Influencing Leaf Chlorophyll Content in Natural Forests at the Biome Scale. Front Ecol Evol. 2018;6 :64.
43 Abdel-Motagally FMF . Response of lentil to foliar application of potassium phosphate under different irrigation. Assiut J Agric Sci. 2014;45 :28–38.
44 Thakur V , Patil RP , Patil JR , Suma TC , Umesh MR . Physiological Approaches for Yield Improvement of Blackgram under Rainfed Condition. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2017;6 (11 ):4114–4122.
45 Sharma A , Singh PK . Impact of Chlorophyll Content and Stomatal Conductance on Photosynthetic Rates in Black Gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper). J Agronomy Res. 2021;10 (2 ):45–58.
46 Tiwari P , Jha R . Optimizing Nutrient Management for Enhanced Carbon Assimilation in Black Gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper). Agronomy J. 2019;11 (3 ):112–125.
47 Walker AP , Beckerman AP , Gu L , Kattge J , Cernusak LA , Domingues TF , et al . The relationship of leaf photosynthetic traits—V and J—to leaf nitrogen, leaf phosphorus & specific leaf area: A meta-analysis and modelling study. Ecol Evol. 2014;4 :3218–3235.25473475
48 Gago J , Daloso DM , Figueroa CM , Flexas J , Fernie AR , Nikoloski Z . Relationships of leaf net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and mesophyll conductance to primary metabolism: A multispecies meta-analysis approach. Plant Physiol. 2016;171 :1–29. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.01660 26977088
49 Taia A , El–Mageed A , Ahmed MA , El-Sherif Ali MM , El-Wahed MH . Combined effect of deficit irrigation and potassium fertilizer on physiological response, plant water status and yield of soybean in calcareous soil. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 2016;1–14.
50 Maqbool R , Ali W , Nadeem MA , Abbas T . Boron Application in Clay-Loam Soil for Improved Growth, Yield and Protein Contents of Mungbean in Water-Stresses. Sains Malays. 2018;47 (1 ):51–58.
51 Singh B , Usha K . Nodulation and symbiotic nitrogen fixation by genotypes of black gram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper] as affected by fertiliser nitrogen. Aust J Agric Res. 2002;53 :453–457.
52 Banerjee P , Kumari VV , Nath R . Performance of spring-summer blackgram (Vigna mungo) with nutrient fortification under eastern Indian plains. Indian J Agric Sci. 2023;93 (4 ):382–386.
53 Zahran HH . Rhizobium-legume symbiosis and nitrogen fixation under severe conditions and in an arid climate. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1999;63 (4 ):968–989. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.63.4.968-989.1999 10585971
54 Reinprecht Y , Schram L , Marsolais F , Smith TH , Hill B , Pauls KP . Effects of Nitrogen Application on Nitrogen Fixation in Common Bean Production. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11 :1172. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.01172 32849727
55 Choudhary K , Jat RS . Effect of different sowing dates and fertility levels on growth and yield attributes of black gram (Vigna mungo L.). Legume Research: An International Journal. 2019;42 (6 ):743–748.
56 Mishra S , Mohapatra PK , Mishra A . Correlation studies on leaf area index (LAI) and yield attributes of blackgram (Vigna mungo L.) genotypes under different sowing dates and fertility levels. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2018;7 (11 ):2370–2378.
57 Manoj KN , Umesh MR , Ananda N , Duttarganvi S . Effects of low light intensity on radiation use efficiency and productivity of tropical pulses. J Agrometeorol. 2021;23 (3 ):249–256.
58 Tzudir L , Basu S , Maji S , Bera PS , Nath R , Mazumdar D , et al . Impact of weather variables on dry matter accumulation and yield of mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] varieties under different dates of sowing. Legume Res. 2016;39 (3 ):427–434.
59 Worku W , Demisie W . Growth, light interception and light use efficiency of pigeon pea (Cajanas cajan) to planting density in Southern Ethiopia. Agronomy. 2012;11 (4 ):85–93.
60 Massignam AM , Chapman SC , Hammer GL , Fukai S . Physiological determinants of maize and sunflower grain yield as affected by nitrogen supply. Field Crop Res. 2009;113 (3 ):256–267.
61 Sandana P , Ramirez M , Pinochet D . Radiation interception and radiation use efficiency of wheat and pea under different P availabilities. Field Crop Res. 2012;127 :44–50.
62 Basu S , Dutta SK , Fangzauva D , Jena S , Maji S , Nath R , et al . PAR interception and dry matter accumulation in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) cultivars sown at different time periods in the Gangetic Plains of West Bengal. J Agrometeorol. 2013;15 (1 ):201–204.
63 Randhawa MS , Maqsood M , Shehzad MA , Chattha MU , Chattha MB , Nawaz F , et al . Light interception, radiation use efficiency and biomass accumulation response of maize to integrated nutrient management under drought stress conditions. Turk J Field Crop. 2017;22 :134–142.
64 Ullah H , Santiago-Arenas R , Ferdous Z , Attia A , Datta A . Improving water use efficiency, nitrogen use efficiency & radiation use efficiency in field crops under drought stress: A review. Adv Agron. 2019;156 :109–157.
65 Kumar A , Pandey V , Shekh AM , Kumar M . Radiation use efficiency and weather parameter influence during life cycle of soybean (Glycine max Merril) production as well as accumulation of dry matter. Am-Eurasian J Agron. 2008;1 (2 ):41–44.
66 Yahuza I. Review of radiation interception and radiation use efficiency in intercropping in relation to the analysis of wheat/faba bean intercropping system. J Biod Environ Sci. 2011;1 :1–15.
67 Gao Y , Duan AW , Qiu XQ , Liu ZG , Sun JS , Zhang JP . Distribution and use efficiency of photosynthetically active radiation in strip intercropping of maize and soybean. Agron J. 2010;102 :1149–1157.
68 Wang ZK , Zhao XN , Wu PT , He JQ , Chen XL , Gao YI . Radiation interception and utilization by wheat/maize strip intercropping systems. Agr Forest Meteorol. 2015;204 :58–66.
69 Jayakumar K , Vijayarengan P . Influence of cobalt on seed germination and seedling growth of Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper. Plant Arch. 2006;6 (2 ):681–682.
70 Gad N. Increasing the efficiency of nitrogen fertilization through cobalt application to pea plant. Res J Agric Biol Sci. 2006;2 :433–442.
71 Rao DSN , Naidu TCM , Rani YA . Effect of Foliar Nutrition on Antioxidant Enzymes, Photosynthetic Rate, Dry Matter Production and Yield of Mung Bean under Receding Soil Moisture Condition. Int J Pure Appl Biosci. 2015;3 (1 ):115–123.
72 Kannan P , Arunacham P , Prabu Kumar G , Prabhaharan J . Response of black gram (Vigna mungo L.) to multi micronutrient mixtures under rainfed Alfisol. J Indian Soc Soil Sci. 2014;62 (2 ):154–160.
73 Srivastava S , Shukla AK . Differential Response of Black Gram towards Heavy Metal Stress. Environ Pollut Protect. 2016;1 (2 ):89–96.
74 Bele P , Thakur R . Boron nutrition of crops in relation to yield and Quality: A review. J Pharm Innov. 2019;8 (6 ):430–433.
75 Panotra N , Kumar A , Singh OP . Effect of varieties and dates of sowing on growth parameters, yield attributes and yield of black gram (Vigna mungo L.). Int J Sci Environ Technol. 2016;5 (6 ):3821–3826.
76 Awomi TA , Singh AK , Singh AP , Bordoloi LJ . Effect of phosphorus, molybdenum and cobalt on growth yield and nutrient content of mungbean and soil fertility. J Soil Crop. 2011;21 (2 ):158–164.
77 Banerjee P , Mukherjee B , Ghosh A , Pramanik M , Nath R . Influence of seed priming and foliar nutrition on quality and nutrient uptake of relay grass pea (Lathyrus Sativus L.) in Gangetic plains of West Bengal. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2020;9 (5 ):2864–2872.
78 Akbar FM , Zafar M , Hamid A , Ahmed M , Khaliq A , Khan MR , et al . Interactive Effect of Cobalt and Nitrogen on Growth, Nodulation, Yield and Protein Content of Field Grown Pea. Hort Environ Biotechnol. 2013;54 (6 ):465–474.
79 Subbaramma P , Sangamitra M , Manjusha D . Mitigation of drought stress in production of pulses. Int J Multidiscip Adv Res Trend. 2017;4 (1/3 ):41–62.
80 Balai CM , Majumdar SP . Metabolites content and water relations of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp] as influenced by different levels of compaction, potassium and cobalt. Curr Agric. 2007;31 (1/2 ):47–53.
81 Upadhyaya H , Dutta BK , Sahoo L , Panda SK . Comparative effect of Ca, K, Mn and B on post-drought stress recovery in tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) O Kuntze). Am J Plant Sci. 2012;3 :443–460.
