
==== Front
Eco Environ Health
Eco Environ Health
Eco-Environment & Health
2772-9850
Elsevier

S2772-9850(24)00029-2
10.1016/j.eehl.2024.04.001
Perspective
The power of green: Harnessing phytoremediation to combat micro/nanoplastics
Yuan Wenke abc
Xu Elvis Genbo d
Shabaka Soha e
Chen Peng abc
Yang Yuyi yangyy@wbgcas.cn
abc⁎
a Hubei Key Laboratory of Wetland Evolution & Ecological Restoration, Wuhan Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430074, China
b Key Laboratory of Lake and Watershed Science for Water Security, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China
c Danjiangkou Wetland Ecosystem Field Scientific Observation and Research Station, Chinese Academy of Sciences & Hubei Province, Wuhan 430074, China
d Department of Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense 5230, Denmark
e National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, Cairo 11516, Egypt
⁎ Corresponding author. yangyy@wbgcas.cn
16 4 2024
9 2024
16 4 2024
3 3 260265
4 12 2023
7 2 2024
2 4 2024
© 2024 The Author(s)
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Plastic pollution and its potential risks have been raising public concerns as a global environmental issue. Global plastic waste may double by 2030, posing a significant challenge to the remediation of environmental plastics. In addition to finding alternative products and managing plastic emission sources, effective removal technologies are crucial to mitigate the negative impact of plastic pollution. However, current remediation strategies, including physical, chemical, and biological measures, are unable to compete with the surging amounts of plastics entering the environment. This perspective lays out recent advances to propel both research and action. In this process, phytoaccumulation, phytostabilization, and phytofiltration can be applied to reduce the concentration of nanoplastics and submicron plastics in terrestrial, aquatic, and atmospheric environments, as well as to prevent the transport of microplastics from sources to sinks. Meanwhile, advocating for a more promising future still requires significant efforts in screening hyperaccumulators, coupling multiple measures, and recycling stabilized plastics from plants. Phytoremediation can be an excellent strategy to alleviate global micro/nanoplastic pollution because of the cost-effectiveness and environmental sustainability of green technologies.

Graphical abstract

Image 1

Highlights

• +Current strategies and technological advances in plastic remediation were reviewed.

• Potential applicability of micro/nanoplastic phytoremediation were elaborated.

• Technological processes for micro/nanoplastic phytoremediation were designed.

• Challenges in advancing plastic phytoremediation techniques were proposed.

Keywords

Environmental sustainability
Hyperaccumulator
Microplastics
Remediation strategies
Technical advances
==== Body
pmc1 Introduction

Plastic is one of the hallmarks of the Anthropocene [1]. As of 2015, approximately 6.3 billion tons of plastic waste were generated globally, 79% of which had entered the environment through landfilling, disposal, domestic sewage, and industrial activities [2]. This tremendous amount of plastic pollution is endangering the aquatic, terrestrial, and atmospheric environments, and potentially threatening food safety and human health [3]. Rivers carry 0.8 million to 2.7 million metric tons of plastics from inland to the ocean every year, which is one of the main contributors to marine pollution [4]. Plastics undergo uncontrolled degradation through physical, chemical, and biological processes in the environment, forming microplastics (<5 mm) and nanoplastics (<1 μm) [5]. These plastic particles can carry a panoply of chemical and biological pollutants to various compartments, consequently and potentially threatening ecosystem functioning and services [[6], [7], [8]].

Addressing plastic pollution has risen to the forefront of the global environmental agenda [9]. In addition to exploiting alternative products for plastics and degradation approaches for plastic waste, there is an urgent need to intercept and recycle plastic debris in the environment [10]. The current solutions for mitigating plastic pollution in the environment can be identified as physical, chemical, and biological strategies [11]. Among them, physical strategies mainly rely on adsorption, flotation, or filtration to separate plastic wastes from the environment. The chemical and biological strategies advocate for the elimination of recycled plastics through thermal degradation, oxidative degradation, and microbial degradation (Fig. 1). Although many efforts have been made, the existing solutions to alleviate micro/nanoplastic pollution remain incomplete and require future improvement to meet environmental sustainability [12].Fig. 1 Current strategies and limitations of plastic remediation mainly involve physical, chemical, and biological measures.

Fig. 1

Phytoremediation is a cost-effective and environmentally friendly technology that has been successfully applied to the remediation of soil, sediment, and water contaminated with heavy metals or organic pollutants [13]. Recent research on the interaction between plants and plastics has found that plants can intercept and even absorb fine plastics from the contaminated environment [14,15], while also exhibiting high tolerance to long-term exposure to micro/nanoplastics at environmental concentrations [16]. Moreover, other plant-associated effects, such as root exudates and rhizosphere microorganisms, may also provide favorable conditions for the immobilization and degradation of plastics [17,18]. Based on reviewing the recent advances in plastic remediation, this perspective proposes the possible applications and future directions of plastic phytoremediation in terrestrial, aquatic, and atmospheric environments. We hereby call for more future efforts on green technologies for remediating micro/nanoplastic pollution, which have great potential to optimize the existing plastic decontamination frameworks and alleviate the increasing plastic issues while balancing environmental friendliness and sustainability.

2 Current strategies and technological advances in plastic remediation

2.1 Physical strategies

Separating plastic debris from the environment is the prerequisite for plastic recycling and harmless disposal [19]. Based on the physical characteristics of plastics and site-specific environments, physical remediation techniques such as adsorption, flotation, and filtration could be employed to alleviate plastic pollution in the environment (Fig. 1). The adsorption process has been applied for wastewater treatment [20], but adsorbents oriented toward plastics removal, specifically, are limited. Although microplastics can be adsorbed or immobilized by biochar particles and carbon nanotubes [21,22], this method could introduce new pollutants into the environment. Sun et al. [23] have developed a compressive sponge using chitin and graphene oxide that can adsorb different types of microplastics at a neutral pH. The density-separation method is unsuitable for large-scale field flotation of plastics, while dissolved air flotation (DAF) may be viable for excluding insoluble substances. Conventional DAF has been proven to remove microplastics between 32.0% and 38.0% [24], indicating that the adhesion between microbubbles and microplastics relying on hydrophilic/hydrophobic interactions is not ideal. Disc filtration may be effective at removing larger plastics; however, smaller plastics may still pass through the filter and remain in the treated water [25]. Sand filtration is another practical approach for removing plastic. The sand filter applied by Hidayaturahaman and Lee [26] showed an exclusion efficacy of up to 97% for microplastics. Membrane bioreactor further improved the removal efficiency of microplastics to nearly 99.4% [27]. However, contamination caused by microplastics may bring irreversible membrane fouling [28,29], affecting the sustainability of the implementation of this technology.

2.2 Chemical strategies

Advancements in chemical degradation are crucial for the upcycling of plastic waste [30]. Thermal degradation and oxidation degradation are common chemical degradation mechanisms of plastics (Fig. 1). The thermal degradation of plastics is the process of decomposing polymers into oligomers and monomers through the absorption of heat [31]. The thermal degradation of plastic usually occurs under controlled conditions, requiring high temperatures or prolonged heating [30]. Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs), including photochemical oxidation and electrochemical oxidation, are considered promising techniques for eliminating plastic pollution [32]. Photochemical oxidation of plastic requires exposing the polymer to sunlight containing sufficient ultraviolet radiation to trigger the photodegradation of plastics [33]. Notably, one crucial factor in the photodegradation process is the environmental temperature, as it plays a significant role in overcoming the energy barrier of polymers and inducing thermal degradation through the process of thermal oxidation [34]. The main principle of electrochemical oxidation is that the polymer near the anode is oxidized by reactive oxygen species generated by anodic oxidation of water or other reagents (e.g., H2O2, sulfate, persulfate, etc.) [35,36]. AOP is currently considered a promising solution for plastic pollution control, but the progress is limited due to catalyst constraints.

2.3 Biological strategies

Existing biological mitigation strategies for plastics mainly focus on microbial or enzymatic degradation [37]. Many fungi and bacterial strains, such as Bacillus, Rhodococcus, Zalerion maritimum, and Aspergillus flavus, have been found to metabolize polymers into monomers [[38], [39], [40]]. Initially, the microbes attach to the surface of plastics and form a plastisphere biofilm [41]. The extracellular enzymes secreted by the microbes (e.g., laccases, peroxidases, lipases, esterase, cutinases, and proteases) then break the chemical bonds of polymers (e.g., C–C, C–N, and –COOR) through enzymatic oxidation and hydrolysis processes [42,43]. Due to their large size, extracellular enzymes can only act on the plastisphere and are unable to penetrate into the plastic. As a result, biodegradation of plastics primarily occurs through pitting [44], which typically initiates within a few days to weeks. For instance, after 28 days of incubation with the fungus A. flavus isolated from the guts of the wax moth, about 3.9% weight loss of high-density polyethylene plastics was observed [40]. The biodegradation of plastics is highly influenced by environmental conditions, including pH, temperature, and humidity, as the reproduction and metabolism of microorganisms require the provision of appropriate conditions [38,45]. Moreover, the lack of universality and low efficiency in plastic degradation may limit the application of biodegradation on a large scale in industries.

3 Applicability of plants in micro/nanoplastic remediation

3.1 Phytoaccumulation of micro/nanoplastics

Phytoaccumulation is a method in which plants absorb and accumulate pollutants, thereby reducing the content of pollutants in the environment [46]. The uptake and accumulation of small-sized plastics have been tested in different plants. The root of Vicia faba was able to accumulate 100-nm plastic beads with an exposure dose of 100 mg/L after 2 days [47]. Nanoplastics have been shown to accumulate in the cell walls of Murraya exotica [48], and have even been observed in the cytoplasm and vacuoles of root cells [49]. Luo et al. [15] quantified the accumulation of submicron plastics (0.2 and 2 μm) in crop plants using europium-doped polystyrene and found that the bioconcentration factors reached 1.8 and 2.9 for wheat and lettuce, respectively. Yuan et al. [16] showed that floating plants like Eichhornia crassipes are promising for immobilizing and removing plastics from the water due to their excellent adsorption capability (6,250 μg/g) and high tolerance to plastic exposure. Moreover, recent studies have confirmed the transport process of nanoplastics and submicron plastics in plants. For instance, 100-nm polystyrene particles were observed to be transported from the roots to the shoots and leaves of Triticum aestivum [50]. Submicron polystyrene and polymethyl methacrylate particles penetrated the root column through the crack-entry mode, and were transported from the root to shoot driven by the transpirational pull [28,29]. The demonstrated ability of plants to accumulate and transport plastics suggests the viability of employing plants for the removal of nanoplastics and submicron plastics from contaminated environments (Fig. 2).Fig. 2 Illustrative examples of the phytoremediation of plastics. Plants may reduce the concentration and/or transportation of micro/nanoplastics in terrestrial, aquatic, and atmospheric environments by phytoaccumulation, phytostabilization, and phytofiltration.

Fig. 2

3.2 Phytostabilization of micro/nanoplastics

Plant stabilization is the process of pollutants being adsorbed on the roots or precipitated in the root zone, and being immobilized at the contaminated sites [46]. Although nanoplastics can be directly absorbed by plant roots, microplastics, due to their larger size, are less likely to penetrate plant tissues [51]. Chen et al. [52] reported that plant roots in constructed wetlands could facilitate the interception of microplastics in water flow. The adhesion of microplastics on the surface of macrophytes has been ascertained. For example, 150-μm polyethylene plastics rapidly adhered to a floating plant Lemna minor, with an adhesion percentage of microplastics reaching 20% of the total particles [53]. Microplastics were found attached to seaweed and macroalgae in the intertidal zone [54], which may prevent the diffusion of plastics from land to sea. The binding of microplastics on aquatic plants may be attributed to the hydrophobic attraction between plastics and aquatic plants, and the anionic polysaccharides secreted by plants may promote the stabilization of plastics on plant surfaces [55]. The capture of micro/nanoplastics by plant roots and surfaces can reduce their mobility, prevent them from reaching and contaminating other locations, as well as minimize their interactions with other organisms (Fig. 2). Subsequently, by means of rhizosphere degradation and regular collection, phytostabilization may emerge as a viable approach for the removal of micro/nanoplastics from the environment.

3.3 Phytofiltration of micro/nanoplastics

Phytofiltration is defined here as vegetation intercepting the flow of plastics through filtration, thereby blocking the unbridled diffusion of micro/nanoplastic pollution (Fig. 2). A basin-wide survey of microplastics demonstrated that grasslands and forests could reduce the abundance of microplastics in freshwater ecosystems [56]. Mangrove wetland is recognized as an intertidal ecosystem that acts as a barrier for retaining land-based plastics [57]. Fibers, foams, and films are dominant microplastics detected in mangrove sediments worldwide [58]. Additionally, the deposition of microplastics on plant leaves presents another pathway for phytofiltration, enabling plants to remove airborne plastic particles. Huang et al. [59] found that the trees with large three-dimensional spaces did have the ability to intercept high-density plastics in the atmosphere. Trees with high coverage (88%) can intercept microfibers and microplastics with an interception rate of approximately 16.3%. Plastic adhesion to plant leaves may be attributed to the electrostatic interaction between plastics and plant biomass. The findings of these studies indicate that phytofiltration holds promise as an in-situ remediation approach for the decontamination of plastics in terrestrial, aquatic, and atmospheric systems.

4 Opportunities and challenges in advancing phytoremediation techniques

Global plastic pollution has received extensive attention, which in turn initiated important dialogue and spurred innovation toward remedial action to solve the pollution problem. Diverse solutions have been proposed, including a circular economy [60], source reduction via waste management infrastructure [61], and large-scale ocean cleanup [62]. Despite this, even with the implementation of cutting-edge technologies, a tremendous amount of plastic is continuing to enter the environment [63]. To combat ocean plastic pollution, various devices incorporating booms, receptacles, and aquatic vehicles have been developed for trash collection [64]. Nevertheless, implementing such a scheme would entail substantial environmental and economic implications.

Phytoremediation provides an environmentally friendly and low-cost micro/nanoplastic remediation idea, which can greatly supplement the shortcomings of the existing plastic clean-up framework. However, many challenges remain to be addressed as this approach is only starting to be realized. A major problem is the lack of confirmed hyperaccumulators targeting micro/nanoplastics. Recent studies suggested that floating plants, such as E. crassipes and L. minor, may be potential hyperaccumulators [16,65]. One possible speculation is that developed root systems and vigorous transpiration are beneficial for the uptake of micro/nanoplastics by plants [16]. Screening plant species with phytoremediation potential for micro/nanoplastic decontamination and exploring the uptake and immobilization mechanisms are needed. Current methods for extracting and quantifying micro/nanoplastics in plants are cumbersome and complex. Developing convenient and efficient methods to analyze micro/nanoplastics quantitatively in plants is of paramount importance in screening hyperaccumulation plants and better understanding the remediation process.

The negative response of plants to micro/nanoplastics-induced stress will affect the efficiency and sustainability of the phytoremediation process, while the positive response could facilitate the phytoaccumulation and phytostabilization of micro/nanoplastics by plants. In plant rhizosphere, root exudates and rhizosphere microbes participate in plastic degradation and protect plants from toxic effects, which could contribute to the phytoremediation of micro/nanoplastics [17,38]. Therefore, understanding the mechanism of plant adaptation to plastic pollution and screening plants with better plastic tolerance would provide favorable conditions for the phytoremediation of micro/nanoplastic pollution. Given that plants are fundamental components of ecosystems, it is crucial to acknowledge that consumers may face potential toxic effects when organisms ingest plants that have accumulated micro/nanoplastics. Microplastic has been proven to be a carrier for pollutants (e.g., metals, organic pollutants, and resistance genes) to get into organisms [8]. Hence, prolonged and field experiments are crucial to exploring the interplay between micro/nanoplastics and other contaminants and their impact on the phytoremediation process.

The advantage of phytoremediation lies in its unique environmental friendliness and sustainability [13]. There are still many aspects that need to be refined to achieve the desired results in phytoremediation. It is important to recognize that phytoremediation serves as a valuable complement to the plastic remediation framework rather than a comprehensive solution on its own. To combat micro/nanoplastic pollution, it is important to address plastic sources, prevent plastic migration, and recycle plastic debris simultaneously. In a realistic environment, plastics of different polymer types and morphology characteristics may exhibit differentiated environmental behaviors. The immobilization of micro/nanoplastic on plant surfaces is not irreversible and may be released again with environmental changes. Therefore, it is necessary to harvest hyperaccumulators and recycle immobilized plastics promptly through means such as salvage, vacuuming, scouring, or gleaning (Fig. 3). To prevent hyperaccumulators from being ingested by organisms and entering the food chain, specific approaches can be to set up quarantine areas, select species outside of animal diets, and collect them in a timely manner. These harvested hyperaccumulators and recycled microplastics can be used for incineration power generation and reuse, thereby reducing micro/nanoplastics pollution in the environment. Additionally, combining phytoremediation with other technologies, such as chemical remediation and microbial degradation, may enhance phytoremediation efficiency and facilitate its wider application and implementation.Fig. 3 Possible mechanisms and technological process of micro/nanoplastics phytoremediation. The plastics absorbed and intercepted by plants can be recycled through different processes for incineration power generation, reuse, or degradation through other chemical and biological measures.

Fig. 3

5 Conclusions

Plastic pollution poses a complex environmental challenge with various land-based sources and few feasible solutions. Scientific understanding and effective solutions have advanced significantly, yet there are still knowledge gaps to address. A transition towards sustainable practices and the “One Health Approach” is likely the key to addressing global plastic pollution. We propose the application of phytoremediation, the power of green technology, utilizing phytoaccumulation, phytostabilization, and phytofiltration, as a potentially promising approach for in-situ micro/nanoplastic remediation in terrestrial, aquatic, and atmospheric environments. The priority of phytoremediation strategies will be on elimination technologies for nanoplastics and submicron plastics, as well as recycling technologies for microplastics. Nonetheless, designing and implementing sustainable solutions is a complex task that requires significant future efforts in screening hyperaccumulators, recycling stabilized plastics, and coupling multiple measures.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

W.K. Y.: conceptualization, writing–original draft, funding acquisition. E.G.B. X.: conceptualization, Writing–review & editing. S. S.: writing–review & editing. P. C.: visualization, software. Y.Y. Y.: resources, supervision, writing–review & editing.

Declaration of competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the 10.13039/501100001809 National Natural Science Foundation of China (32201391 and 42107048 ) and the Special Research Assistant Project, 10.13039/501100002367 Chinese Academy of Sciences (E1291P02 ). E.G.B. X acknowledges the support of the Department of Biology, 10.13039/501100006356 University of Southern Denmark , and Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond (0165-00056B ).
==== Refs
References

1 Zalasiewicz J. Waters C.N. Ivar do Sul J.A. Corcoran P.L. Barnosky A.D. Cearreta A. The geological cycle of plastics and their use as a stratigraphic indicator of the Anthropocene Anthropocene 13 2016 4 17
2 Geyer R. Jambeck J.R. Law K.L. Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made Sci. Adv. 3 7 2017
3 Borrelle S.B. Ringma J. Law K.L. Monnahan C.C. Lebreton L. McGivern A. Predicted growth in plastic waste exceeds efforts to mitigate plastic pollution Science 369 6510 2020 1515 32943526
4 Meijer L.J.J. van Emmerik T. van der Ent R. Schmidt C. Lebreton L. More than 1000 rivers account for 80% of global riverine plastic emissions into the ocean Sci. Adv. 7 18 2021
5 da Costa J.P. Santos P.S.M. Duarte A.C. Rocha-Santos T. (Nano)plastics in the environment - sources, fates and effects Sci. Total Environ. 566 2016 15 26 27213666
6 Alimi O.S. Farner Budarz J. Hernandez L.M. Tufenkji N. Microplastics and nanoplastics in aquatic environments: aggregation, deposition, and enhanced contaminant transport Environ. Sci. Technol. 52 4 2018 1704 1724 29265806
7 Arias-Andres M. Klumper U. Rojas-Jimenez K. Grossart H.P. Microplastic pollution increases gene exchange in aquatic ecosystems Environ. Pollut. 237 2018 253 261 29494919
8 Yang Y. Liu W. Zhang Z. Grossart H.P. Gadd G.M. Microplastics provide new microbial niches in aquatic environments Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 104 15 2020 6501 6511 32500269
9 UNEP Beat plastic pollution https://www.unep.org/interactives/beat-plastic-pollution/ 2018
10 Weckhuysen B.M. Creating value from plastic waste Science 370 6515 2020 400 401 33093094
11 Ji J. Zhao T. Li F. Remediation technology towards zero plastic pollution: recent advance and perspectives Environ. Pollut. 313 2022 120166
12 Helal M. Hartmann N.B. Khan F.R. Xu E.G. Time to integrate “one health approach” into nanoplastic research Eco-Environment & Health 2 1 2023 18 20 38074454
13 Wang J. Delavar M.A. Techno-economic analysis of phytoremediation: a strategic rethinking Sci. Total Environ. 902 2023 165949
14 Gallitelli L. Battisti C. Scalici M. Dunal plants intercepting macrolitter: implications for beach clean-ups Mar. Pollut. Bull. 187 2023 114585
15 Luo Y. Li L. Feng Y. Li R. Yang J. Peijnenburg W. Quantitative tracing of uptake and transport of submicrometre plastics in crop plants using lanthanide chelates as a dual-functional tracer Nat. Nanotechnol. 17 4 2022 424 431 35058654
16 Yuan W. Xu E.G. Li L. Zhou A. Peijnenburg W. Grossart H.P. Tracing and trapping micro- and nanoplastics: untapped mitigation potential of aquatic plants? Water Res. 242 2023 120249
17 Deng H. Zhang Y. Li D. Fu Q. He J. Zhao Y. Mangrove degradation retarded microplastics weathering and affected metabolic activities of microplastics-associated microbes J. Hazard Mater. 445 2023 130535
18 Lin L. Xu E.G. Liu M. Yang Y. Zhou A. Suyamud B. Microbiological processes of submicrometer plastics affecting submerged plant growth in a chronic exposure microcosm Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 10 1 2023 33 39
19 MacLeo M. Arp H.P.H. Tekman M.B. Jahnke A. The global threat from plastic pollution Science 373 6550 2021 61 65 34210878
20 Kegl T. Kosak A. Lobnik A. Novak Z. Kralj A.K. Ban I. Adsorption of rare earth metals from wastewater by nanomaterials: a review J. Hazard Mater. 386 2020 121632
21 Siipola V. Pflugmacher S. Romar H. Wendling L. Koukkari P. Low-cost biochar adsorbents for water purification including microplastics removal Appl. Sci. 10 3 2020 788
22 Tang Y. Zhang S. Su Y. Wu D. Zhao Y. Xie B. Removal of microplastics from aqueous solutions by magnetic carbon nanotubes Chem. Eng. J. 406 2021 126804
23 Sun C. Wang Z. Chen L. Li F. Fabrication of robust and compressive chitin and graphene oxide sponges for removal of microplastics with different functional groups Chem. Eng. J. 393 2020 124796
24 Wang Y. Li Y.N. Tian L. Ju L. Liu Y. The removal efficiency and mechanism of microplastics enhancement by positive modification dissolved air flotation Water Environ. Res. 93 5 2020 693 702 32363675
25 Talvitie J. Mikola A. Koistinen A. Setala O. Solutions to microplastic pollution - removal of microplastics from wastewater effluent with advanced wastewater treatment technologies Water Res. 123 2017 401 407 28686942
26 Hidayaturrahman H. Lee T.G. A study on characteristics of microplastic in wastewater of South Korea: identification, quantification, and fate of microplastics during treatment process Mar. Pollut. Bull. 146 2019 696 702 31426211
27 Lares M. Ncibi M.C. Sillanpaa M. Sillanpaa M. Occurrence, identification and removal of microplastic particles and fibers in conventional activated sludge process and advanced MBR technology Water Res. 133 2018 236 246 29407704
28 Li L. Liu D. Song K. Zhou Y. Performance evaluation of MBR in treating microplastics polyvinylchloride contaminated polluted surface water Mar. Pollut. Bull. 150 2020 110724
29 Li L. Luo Y. Li R. Zhou Q. Peijnenburg W. Yin N. Effective uptake of submicrometre plastics by crop plants via a crack-entry mode Nat. Sustain. 3 2020 929 937
30 Liu L. Xu M. Ye Y. Zhang B. On the degradation of (micro)plastics: degradation methods, influencing factors, environmental impacts Sci. Total Environ. 806 2022 151312
31 Zhang K. Hamidian A.H. Tubic A. Zhang Y. Fang J.K.H. Wu C. Understanding plastic degradation and microplastic formation in the environment: a review Environ. Pollut. 274 2021 116554
32 Ali S.S. Elsamahy T. Koutra E. Kornaros M. El S.M. Abdelkarim E. Degradation of conventional plastic wastes in the environment: a review on current status of knowledge and future perspectives of disposal Sci. Total Environ. 771 2021 144719
33 Ahmed M.B. Rahman M.S. Alom J. Hasan M.D.S. Johir M.A.H. Mondal M.I.H. Microplastic particles in the aquatic environment: a systematic review Sci. Total Environ. 775 2021 145793
34 He J. Han L. Wang F. Ma C. Cai Y. Ma W. Photocatalytic strategy to mitigate microplastic pollution in aquatic environments: promising catalysts, efficiencies, mechanisms, and ecological risks Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53 4 2023 504 526
35 Du H. Xie Y. Wang J. Microplastic degradation methods and corresponding degradation mechanism: research status and future perspectives J. Hazard Mater. 418 2021 126377
36 Ouyang Z. Li S. Zhao M. Wangmu Q. Ding R. Xiao C. The aging behavior of polyvinyl chloride microplastics promoted by UV-activated persulfate process J. Hazard Mater. 424 2022 127461
37 Mohanan N. Montazer Z. Sharma P.K. Levin D.B. Microbial and enzymatic degradation of synthetic plastics Front. Microbiol. 11 2020 580709
38 Auta H.S. Emenike C.U. Jayanthi B. Fauziah S.H. Growth kinetics and biodeterioration of polypropylene microplastics by Bacillus sp. and Rhodococcus sp. isolated from mangrove sediment Mar. Pollut. Bull. 127 2018 15 21 29475646
39 Paco A. Duarte K. da Costa J.P. Santos P.S.M. Pereira R. Pereira M.E. Biodegradation of polyethylene microplastics by the marine fungus Zalerion maritimum Sci. Total Environ. 586 2017 10 15 28199874
40 Zhang J. Gao D. Li Q. Zhao Y. Li L. Lin H. Biodegradation of polyethylene microplastic particles by the fungus Aspergillus flavus from the guts of wax moth Galleria mellonella Sci. Total Environ. 704 2020 135931
41 Rummel C.D. Jahnke A. Gorokhova E. Kuehnel D. Schmitt-Jansen M. Impacts of biofilm formation on the fate and potential effects of microplastic in the aquatic environment Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 4 7 2017 258 267
42 Magnin A. Pollet E. Phalip V. Averous L. Evaluation of biological degradation of polyurethanes Biotechnol. Adv. 39 2020 107457
43 Zhou Y. Kumar M. Sarsaiya S. Sirohi R. Awasthi S.K. Sindhu R. Challenges and opportunities in bioremediation of micro-nano plastics: a review Sci. Total Environ. 802 2022 149823
44 Madbouly S.A. Schrader J.A. Srinivasan G. Liu K. McCabe K.G. Grewell D. Biodegradation behavior of bacterial-based polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) and DDGS composites Green Chem. 16 4 2014 1911 1920
45 Park S.Y. Kim C.G. Biodegradation of micro-polyethylene particles by bacterial colonization of a mixed microbial consortium isolated from a landfill site Chemosphere 222 2019 527 533 30721811
46 Muthusaravanan S. Sivarajasekar N. Vivek J.S. Paramasivan T. Naushad M. Prakashmaran J. Phytoremediation of heavy metals: mechanisms, methods and enhancements Environ. Chem. Lett. 16 2018 1339 1359
47 Jiang X. Chen H. Liao Y. Ye Z. Li M. Klobucar G. Ecotoxicity and genotoxicity of polystyrene microplastics on higher plant Vicia faba Environ. Pollut. 250 2019 831 838 31051394
48 Zhang T. Wang C. Dong F. Gao Z. Zhang C. Zhang X. Uptake and translocation of styrene maleic anhydride nanoparticles in Murraya exotica plants as revealed by noninvasive, real-time optical bioimaging Environ. Sci. Technol. 53 3 2019 1471 1481 30605315
49 Giorgetti L. Spano C. Muccifora S. Bottega S. Barbieri F. Bellani L. Exploring the interaction between polystyrene nanoplastics and Allium cepa during germination: internalization in root cells, induction of toxicity and oxidative stress Plant Physiol. Bioch 149 2020 170 177
50 Lian J. Wu J. Xiong H. Zeb A. Yang T. Su X. Impact of polystyrene nanoplastics (PSNPs) on seed germination and seedling growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) J. Hazard Mater. 385 2020 121620 121630 31744724
51 Gao M. Liu Y. Dong Y. Song Z. Effect of polyethylene particles on dibutyl phthalate toxicity in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) J. Hazard Mater. 401 2021 123422
52 Chen Y. Li T. Hu H. Ao H. Xiong X. Shi H. Transport and fate of microplastics in constructed wetlands: a microcosm study J. Hazard Mater. 415 2021 125615
53 Rozman U. Kokalj A.J. Dolar A. Drobne D. Kalcikova G. Long-term interactions between microplastics and floating macrophyte Lemna minor: the potential for phytoremediation of microplastics in the aquatic environment Sci. Total Environ. 831 2022 154866
54 Seng N. Lai S. Fong J. Saleh M.F. Cheng C. Cheok Z.Y. Early evidence of microplastics on seagrass and macroalgae. Mar Freshwater Res. 71 8 2020 922 928
55 Sundbaek K.B. Koch I.D.W. Villaro C.G. Rasmussen N.S. Holdt S.L. Hartmann N.B. Sorption of fluorescent polystyrene microplastic particles to edible seaweed Fucus vesiculosus J. Appl. Phycol. 30 5 2018 2923 2927
56 Yuan W. Christie-Oleza J.A. Xu E.G. Li J. Zhang H. Wang W. Environmental fate of microplastics in the world's third-largest river: basin-wide investigation and microplastic community analysis Water Res. 210 2022 118002
57 Helcoski R. Yonkos L.T. Sanchez A. Baldwin A.H. Wetland soil microplastics are negatively related to vegetation cover and stem density Environ. Pollut. 256 2020 113391
58 Li R. Zhang L. Xue B. Wang Y. Abundance and characteristics of microplastics in the mangrove sediment of the semi-enclosed Maowei Sea of the south China sea: new implications for location, rhizosphere, and sediment compositions Environ. Pollut. 244 2019 685 692 30384074
59 Huang X. Chen Y. Meng Y. Liu G. Yang M. Are we ignoring the role of urban forests in intercepting atmospheric microplastics? J. Hazard Mater. 436 2022 129096
60 World Economic Forum https://www.weforum.org/reports 2016
61 Ocean Conservancy https://oceanconservancy.org/ 2015
62 Slat B. Ardiyanti A. Arens E. Bolle E. Brugman H. Campbell H. How the oceans can clean themselves: A feasibility study 2014 The Ocean Cleanup The Netherlands 10.13140/RG.2.2.34283.54566
63 Vassilenko E. Watkins M. Chastain S. Mertens J. Posacka A.M. Patankar S. Domestic laundry and microfiber pollution: exploring fiber shedding from consumer apparel textiles PLoS One 16 7 2021 0250346
64 Nikiema J. Asiedu Z. A review of the cost and effectiveness of solutions to address plastic pollution Environ. Sci. Pollut. R. 29 17 2022 24547 24573
65 Arikan B. Alp F.N. Ozfidan-Konakci C. Yildiztugay E. Turan M. Cavusoglu H. The impacts of nanoplastic toxicity on the accumulation, hormonal regulation and tolerance mechanisms in a potential hyperaccumulator - Lemna minor L J. Hazard Mater. 440 2023 129692
