
==== Front
Cell Death Dis
Cell Death Dis
Cell Death & Disease
2041-4889
Nature Publishing Group UK London

39227585
7026
10.1038/s41419-024-07026-5
Article
PILRB potentiates the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway and reprograms cholesterol metabolism to drive gastric tumorigenesis and metastasis
Wang Xing 1
Liu Yuanyuan 2
Zhao Qiuyan 3
Wang Xin 4
Chen Xinyi 5
Hou Li 5
Tian Shaodan 5
Peng Zi-Mei 6
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1156-8115
Han Xiao-Jian 7
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4535-3830
Wang Tao 7
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6400-6052
Zhang Zhen 6
Tou Fang-Fang 8
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0735-2960
Huang Shan huangshan91@aliyun.com

8
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5089-778X
Rao Jun raojun1986@126.com

9
Chen Lixiao Chenlixiao1201@163.com

2
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9242-5107
Zheng Zhi zhengxia_2007@163.com

8
1 grid.415002.2 0000 0004 1757 8108 Centre for Medical Research and Translation, Jiangxi Provincial People’s Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, 330006 China
2 grid.16821.3c 0000 0004 0368 8293 Department of Otolaryngology: Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200080 China
3 grid.414011.1 0000 0004 1808 090X Department of Gastroenterology, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan China
4 https://ror.org/033vnzz93 grid.452206.7 0000 0004 1758 417X Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016 China
5 https://ror.org/05damtm70 grid.24695.3c 0000 0001 1431 9176 Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Chaoyang, China
6 grid.415002.2 0000 0004 1757 8108 Institute of Clinical Medicine, Jiangxi Provincial People’s Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, 330006 China
7 grid.415002.2 0000 0004 1757 8108 Institute of Geriatrics, Jiangxi Provincial People’s Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330006 PR China
8 grid.415002.2 0000 0004 1757 8108 Jiangxi Provincial People’s Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, 330006 China
9 grid.452533.6 0000 0004 1763 3891 Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Jiangxi Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Nanchang, Jiangxi PR China
3 9 2024
3 9 2024
9 2024
15 9 64210 4 2024
9 8 2024
22 8 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Paired immunoglobin-like type 2 receptor beta (PILRB) mainly plays a crucial role in regulating innate immunity, but whether PILRB is involved in cancer is poorly understood. Here, we report that PILRB potentiates the PI3K/AKT pathway to drive gastric tumorigenesis by binding and stabilizing IRS4, which could hyperactivate the PI3K/AKT pathway. Firstly, the levels of PILRB are upregulated in human gastric cancer (GC) specimens and associated with poor prognosis in patients with GC. In addition, our data show that PILRB promotes cell proliferation, colony formation, cell migration and invasion in GC cells in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, PILRB recruits the deubiquitination enzymes OTUB1 to IRS4 and relieves K48-linked ubiquitination of IRS4, protecting IRS4 protein from proteasomal-mediated degradation and subsequent activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway. Importantly, the levels of PILRB are positively correlated with IRS4 in GC specimens. Meanwhile, we also found that PILRB reprogrammed cholesterol metabolism by altering ABCA1 and SCARB1 expression levels, and PILRB-expression confers GC cell resistance to statin treatment. Taken together, our findings illustrate that the oncogenic role of PILRB in gastric tumorigenesis, providing new insights into the regulation of PI3K/AKT signaling in GC and establishing PILRB as a biomarker for simvastatin therapy resistance in GC.

Subject terms

Gastric cancer
Gastric cancer
https://doi.org/10.13039/501100010857 Jiangxi Provincial Department of Science and Technology (Department of Science and Technology, Jiangxi Province) 20232BCJ22057 20232BAB216074 20212BCJL23056 Wang Xing Rao Jun Zheng Zhi issue-copyright-statement© Associazione Differenziamento e Morte Cellulare ADMC 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Gastric cancer (GC) is a complex and aggressive disease with heterogeneous features that accounts for a notable proportion of cancer-related deaths worldwide [1, 2]. GC is the most common adenocarcinoma, exhibiting various molecular and histologic subtypes influenced by multiple genetic and epigenetic alterations, infections, and the tumor environment [3, 4]. Although accumulating evidence suggests a recent decline in incidence due to the advancements in surgical approaches and adjuvant chemotherapy, GC continues to rank as the world’s third most common cause of cancer mortality, which is attributed to the lack of sensitive and specific early diagnostic markers [5]. Owing to its heterogeneity and complexity, GC is an aggressive disease with a poor prognosis. Patients are always diagnosed at an advanced stage, presenting with regional metastasis at the time of diagnosis [6]. Lymph node metastasis is one of the most common indicators of prognosis and recurrence in patients with GC. The number of metastatic lymph nodes negatively correlates with tumor aggressiveness and prognosis [7, 8]. Consequently, further elucidation of the molecular mechanisms regulating GC recurrence and metastasis is urgently needed to improve the prognosis of patients with GC.

The paired immunoglobulin-like type 2 receptor (PILR) belongs to the Ig superfamily, comprising the inhibitory receptor PILR alpha (PILRA) and the activating receptor PILR beta (PILRB). Both PILRA and PILRB share high similarities in their extracellular domains, suggesting that they may recognize similar ligands although their intracellular domains are different [9, 10]. PILRA has two immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motifs (ITIM) in its intracellular domain that recruit the phosphatases SHP-1 and SHP-2 to induce an inhibitory signaling cascade, resulting in reduced calcium mobilization in the cytoplasm [11, 12]. Although PILRB contains a truncated intracellular domain without an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM), it has a charged amino acid residue in its transmembrane region that binds to the ITAM-bearing DAP12 adapter molecule to trigger an activating signal [13]. PILRB is primarily expressed in myeloid lineages, including natural killer (NK) cells, dendritic cells, and macrophages. PILRB-knockout mice were challenged with Toxoplasma gondii-induced inflammation, including chronic encephalitis and inflammatory bowel disease [14, 15]. Previous studies reported that PILRB interacts with various ligands, including CD99, which appear to regulate immune cells and inflammation. NK cells and dendritic cells can be activated by cells expressing PILR ligands [14]. To the best of our knowledge, no previous studies have evaluated the expression levels of PILRB in tumor cells. Furthermore, no evidence has been shown regarding the contribution of PILRB to cancer cell progression or metastasis.

Reprogramming cholesterol metabolism has always occurred in most tumors, which promotes tumor progression and metastasis by maintaining cellular cholesterol homeostasis [16]. Cellular cholesterol homeostasis is controlled by the synthesis, influx, efflux, and metabolism [17, 18]. In cancer, homeostatic cholesterol processes can be disturbed to facilitate cancer cell’s survival and aberrant proliferation. Targeting cholesterol metabolism is a promising strategy for numerous malignancies and has been widely tested in clinics [19]. However, the benefits are modest, and this treatment is hindered by the lack of a promising biomarker to identify GC patients who may benefit from the cholesterol-lowering agents [20]. Therefore, a complete understanding of cholesterol metabolism is needed for improving the efficacy of targeting cholesterol metabolism to treat cancer. To date, the importance of PILRB in regulating reprogramming cholesterol metabolism remains to be uncovered.

In this study, we aimed to determine the expression of PILRB and its clinical relevance in GC. Our results revealed that ectopic PILRB expression is significantly associated with more aggressive malignancies and poorer survival outcomes in GC. In vitro and in vivo functional experiments with PILRB knockdown and overexpressing GC cells suggested oncogenic functions of PILRB in tumorigenicity and metastasis. Moreover, PILRB conferred resistance to AKT inhibitors in GC cells. Mechanistically, PILRB mainly relied on the hyperactivation of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway by stabilizing IRS4. The specific molecular mechanism involves the direct interaction of PILRB with IRS4 in GC cells, subsequently inhibiting IRS4 ubiquitination/degradation through the recruitment of OTUB1. Meanwhile, we also found that PILRB could decrease the GC cellular cholesterol level depending on altering ABCA1 and SCARB1 expression levels and that PILRB confers gastric cell resistance to statins therapy. Overall, this study elucidates insight into the role of PILRB in regulating the PI3K/AKT pathway and provides a promising therapeutic strategy for GC patients with PILRB expression.

Material and methods

Cells

Human GC cells, including AGS, BGC823, HGC-27, MGC-803, MKN45, SGC7901, and SNU-1, and the human gastric epithelial cell line GES-1 were obtained from Thousand Sunrise (Shanghai, China). The human embryonic kidney cell line HEK293T was obtained from the China Center for Type Culture Collection (CCTCC, Shanghai, China). Cells were authenticated using short tandem repeat fingerprinting. GES-1, AGS, BGC823, HGC-27, MGC-803, MKN45, SGC7901, and SNU-1 were cultured in RPMI-1640, and HEK293T cells in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 100 U/mL penicillin–streptomycin (Life Technologies, USA) and maintained at 37 °C with 5% CO2. We ensured that all cell lines were authenticated by STR profiling and tested for mycoplasma infection.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

IHC staining was performed on paraffin-embedded GC and adjacent normal tissue sections using antibodies (Table S1). Briefly, specimens were cut into 5 μm sections and baked at 65 °C for 30 min. Sections were deparaffinized, and were submerged in antigenic retrieval buffer, and microwaved for antigenic retrieval. The endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched using 3% hydrogen peroxide in methanol. Subsequently, the sections were incubated with 1% FBS to block nonspecific binding, and finally treated with antibodies overnight at 4 °C. The following day, after washing with primary antibodies, the samples were incubated with secondary antibodies for 2 h, followed by further treatment with a streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase complex. Two independent pathologists, who were blinded to the clinicopathological outcomes, evaluated and scored the IHC staining. The final score was taken as the median, and scores below the median indicated low expression, whereas above the median suggested high expression.

Western blotting and immunoprecipitation

Western blotting was performed according to the standard protocol. Briefly, the samples were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and blotted onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes. Membranes were blocked by 5% fat-free milk in TBST for one hour and then incubated with the primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. After washing three times with TBST, the membranes were incubated with secondary antibodies for an hour. Finally, the bands were detected using chemiluminescence. For co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assay, cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with Protein A/G agarose plus antibodies or anti-FLAG-M2 agarose for 4–6 h at 4 °C and then washed three times with lysis buffer, boiled in 2×SDS loading buffer, separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by western blotting.

RNA extraction, qRT-PCR analysis, and transcriptome sequencing analysis

Total RNA was isolated from GC cells using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, USA), and cDNA was synthesized with random primers using the PrimeScriptTM RT reagent kit (Takara) and served as a template for real-time PCR using the Bio-Rad CFX96TM Real-time PCR System (Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as an internal control. The relative mRNA expression levels were determined using the 2ΔΔCt method. The qRT-PCR primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Table S2. All reactions were performed in triplicates. For transcriptome sequencing analysis, total RNA was extracted from shNC- and shPILRB-AGS cells according to the protocol described in our previous study.

Lentivirus infection for stable cells and plasmid transfection

The lentivirus used in this study was purchased from Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). To get a stable cell line, the lentivirus particles were directly added into GC cells and then treated with puromycin (1–3 μg/mL) for 14 days. Knockdown efficiency was validated by qRT-PCR and western blotting. All the vectors were confirmed by sequencing prior to use. The plasmids were transfected into the cells using PEI, following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Cell proliferation and colony formation assays

For cell proliferation assay, 2 × 103 cells were seeded into a 96-well plate and then incubated with CCK-8 solution for 2 h at 37 °C following the manufacturer’s protocol at indicated time points after seeding. For the colony formation assay, gastric cells were collected using 0.25% trypsin, counted, and plated in new 6-well plates at 500 cells/dish. After approximately 14 d, the cells were washed with PBS, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min, and stained with 1% crystal violet.

Cell migration and invasion assay

A wound-healing assay was used to verify cell migration. Briefly, GC cells in the exponential phase of proliferation were collected and seeded in a new 6-well plate. When the cells reached 90% confluence, three separate wounds were created by mechanically scratching with a 200 μL pipet tip, moving perpendicular to the line. Next, the cells were gently washed with PBS to remove the floating cells. Images of the scratches were acquired using an inverted microscope at the indicated time points. For the migration assays, 3 × 104 GC cells were harvested and seeded into 8.0 μm pore (24-well insert; 8 μm pore, BD Biosciences) inserts without Matrigel. The migration time was 48 h. For the invasion assays, a total of 3 × 104 GC cells were digested and seeded into the upper chamber with the Matrigel-coated membrane (24-well insert; 8 μm pore, BD Biosciences) without FBS 1640 culture medium, while a complete culture medium with 10% FBS was used as the chemo-attractant in the lower chamber. After 24 h, invading cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with 0.1% crystal violet. Finally, invading cells in five random fields of view were counted. Each experiment was conducted in triplicate, and the mean values are shown.

MG132 or cycloheximide (CHX) treatment

GC cells were transfected with plasmid or shRNA and then were treated with MG132 (10 μM, S2619, Selleck) or CHX (100 μg/mL, S7418, Selleck) for different durations. Samples from the above cells were harvested with RIPA lysis buffer and fractionated by SDS-PAGE, followed by western blotting.

In vivo ubiquitination assay

The cells were transfected with plasmids or shRNA and treated with MG132 for 6 h before collection. Samples from the above cells were harvested with lysis buffer and fractionated using SDS-PAGE.

Cholesterol assay

Cellular total cholesterol levels were detected by a Total Cholesterol Assay Kit (Cell Biolabs). Briefly, cellular lipids were harvested by chloroform: 2-propanon:NP-40 (7:11:0.1) in a micro-homogenizer, and the cholesterol levels were measured according to the manufacturer’s protocols.

In vivo tumorigenicity and metastasis models

To evaluate the tumorigenic effect of PILRB, 4- to 5-week-old female BALB/C nude mice were randomly assigned to two groups and were injected subcutaneously with PILRB-deficiency and control MKN-28 cells (2 × 106 suspended in 100 μL PBS) in each mouse. Tumor size was monitored every 4 days by measuring the length and width of the tumor, where length (L) was the longest diameter and width (W) the shortest diameter. The tumor volume was calculated according to the standard formula: V = 1/2 × L × W2. At the end of this stage, the mice were euthanized, and the tumors were excised, imaged, and weighed. For the tail veil injection model, 2 × 106 GC cells in 200 μL sterile PBS from different groups were injected into the median tail vein of nude mice. The mice were sacrificed 90 days after injection, and the lungs were collected, fixed in 4% PFA, embedded in paraffin, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). The metastatic nodules in the lungs were observed under a microscope. All animal experiments were performed in accordance with the guidelines of animal experiments in the Laboratory Animal Center. Male 4–6-week-old nude mice were purchased from Cyagen (Shanghai, China) and used as xenograft models. 5 × 106 cells transfected with shNC and shPILRB were suspended in 60 µl PBS and injected into the footpads of the mice. Six weeks after injection, the mice were euthanized, and popliteal lymph nodes were removed for measurement and IHC analysis.

Statistical analysis

All sample sizes were sufficiently large to ensure proper statistical analyses, which were performed using GraphPrime software. Data were analyzed using a two-sided Student’s t-test or one- or two-way ANOVA according to the situation. Kaplan–Meier plots with log-rank tests were used to analyze the survival data. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant (ns, no significance, * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.001).

Results

PILRB level was elevated within GC, which predicted a poor prognosis

Exploring the function of PILRB in GC progression, we observed that in TCGA database, PILRB mRNA levels were significantly upregulated in stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD) samples compared with that in normal tissues (Fig. 1A). Regarding prognosis the following were observed: patients with advanced clinical stages had distinctly higher PILRB mRNA levels than normal tissues (Fig. 1B), cases having higher tumor grade exhibited increased PILRB expression compared to adjacent tissues (Fig. 1C), and patients with advanced LNM showed higher PILRB expression than normal tissues (Fig. 1D). In TCGA database, there is no significant difference in PILRB mRNA levels in tumor tissues of GC patients with different clinical stages, tumor grades, and LNM. Moreover, patients with GC in the GSE62254 dataset showing PILRB downregulation were significantly associated with better overall survival (OS) and first progression (PF) (Fig. 1E, F). In our cohort, qRT-PCR and western blotting (WB) assays showed that PILRB was upregulated at both the mRNA and protein levels in GC patient samples (Fig. 1G, H). However, there is no significant difference in the PILRB protein levels of GC patients with LN metastasis compared with patients without LN metastasis (Fig. S1A). Furthermore, the IHC assay showed that PILRB protein levels were higher in cancer samples (Fig. 1I). We then performed survival analysis in our cohort and found that patients with high PILRB levels showed poor OS (Fig. 1J). These results demonstrate that PILRB is upregulated in GC and may be a potential prognostic indicator for patients with GC.Fig. 1 Elevated PILRB expression associated with poor clinical outcomes in GC patients.

A TCGA database on the UALCAN website displayed that PILRB mRNA level was increased in stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD) tissues. B TCGA database on the UALCAN website revealed that PILRB expression is higher in STAD patients with advanced clinical stage compared to adjacent normal tissues. C TCGA database on the UALCAN website indicated that STAD patients with advanced lymph node metastasis had remarkably higher PILRB expression compared to adjacent normal tissues. D TCGA database on the UALCAN website illustrated that patients with high tumor grade had higher STAD expression compared to adjacent normal tissues. E, F Kaplan–Meier estimates of overall survival (E) and PF (F) in STAD patients by different PILRB protein levels (https://kmplot.com/analysis/). G PILRB mRNA levels were significantly upregulated in tumor tissues compared with paired normal tissues (n = 12). H Western blotting analysis demonstrated higher levels of PILRB protein in tumor tissues compared with paired normal tissues (n = 12). I Representative IHC images (Left) and IHC score (Right) of PILRB protein levels in tumors and paired normal tissues (n = 49). J Survival analysis of 49 patients with STAD in relation to different PILRB expression levels (P < 0.05).

PILRB expression accelerates GC cell growth

To investigate the relationship between PILRB and GC progression, we measured PILRB protein levels in GC cells and selected four cell lines (AGS, MKN-28, HGC-27, and MGC-803) with different PILRB expression levels to perform further experiments (Fig. 2A). We knocked down PILRB and constructed stable PILRB-overexpressing GC cells, and then validated the efficacy of PILRB protein levels by WB (Fig. 2B). Further, in vitro loss- and gain-of-function experiments were conducted to explore the role of PILRB in the progression of GC. PILRB knockdown by shRNA in AGS and MKN-28 cells significantly inhibited their proliferation and clonogenicity. In contrast, ectopic expression of PILRB in HGC-27 and MGC-803 cells remarkably increased their proliferation and clonogenicity (Fig. 2C, D and Fig. S2A). These results indicated that PILRB plays an oncogenic role in GC.Fig. 2 PILRB promotes proliferation and metastasis in GC cells in vitro.

A Immunoblotting of PILRB expression in human HNSCC cells (GES-1, HGC-27, BGC-823, SNU-1, MKN-28, MKN45, MGC-803, AGS). B Western blotting of normal control (shNC) versus PILRB knockdown with sh#1, sh#2 in AGS and MKN-28, and vector versus PILRB overexpression (PILRB) efficiencies in HGC-27 and MGC-803 cells. C, D Cell colony formation assays of PILRB knockdown and PILRB overexpression GC cells were recorded (C) and quantitatively analyzed (D). E, F Wound-healing assay of PILRB knockdown and overexpression GC cells were recorded (E) and quantitatively analyzed (F). G, H Images, and quantification of transwell migration and invasion assays of PILRB knockdown and overexpression GC cells were recorded (G) and quantitatively analyzed (H).

PILRB promotes GC cell migration and invasion

To evaluate the effects of PILRB on cell migration and invasion, it was observed that epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) markers were upregulated by PILRB. The expression of mesenchymal markers (N-cadherin and vimentin) was suppressed, while the expression of epithelial markers (E-cadherin) was elevated in PILRB knockdown by shRNA in AGS and MKN-28 cells. In contrast, ectopic expression of PILRB in HGC-27 and MGC-803 cells remarkably increased the expression of mesenchymal markers (N-cadherin and vimentin) and inhibited the expression of epithelial markers (E-cadherin) (Fig. S2B). As determined by wound-healing and Matrigel invasion assays, knockdown of PILRB markedly inhibited the migration and invasion abilities of AGS and MKN-28 cells, whereas PILRB overexpression significantly increased the migration abilities of HGC-27 and MGC-803 cells (Fig. 2E–H). These findings demonstrated that PILRB plays an important role in promoting the migration and invasion of GC cells.

PILRB activates PI3K/AKT signaling pathway

To explore the molecular mechanisms underlying the oncogenic role of PILRB, we performed RNA-sequencing in the deficiency of PILRB and control AGS/MKN28 cancer cells. Notably, the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis showed that PILRB might activate the ERK/MAPK and/or PI3K/AKT signaling pathways in GC cells (Fig. 3A and Fig. S3A). Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis from the RNA-seq results demonstrated that differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of GC cells with or without PILRB knockdown were enriched in extracellular matrix organization, plasma membrane, and cell migration, which were associated with the process of EMT (Fig. S3B, C). Next, we performed a WB assay to examine the activation of the ERK/MAPK and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways and found that PILRB knockdown suppressed the activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway while not affecting the ERK/MAPK pathway. Meanwhile, PILRB overexpression stimulated the PI3K/AKT pathway while not influencing the ERK/MAPK pathway (Fig. 3B). Consistent with these results, the suppression of the PI3K/AKT pathway caused by PILRB depletion was reversible by overexpression of PILRB (Fig. 3C). To test whether the oncogenic function of PILRB was dependent on PI3K/AKT activation, PILRB-overexpressing GC cells were treated with GDC-0941 (a PI3K/AKT inhibitor), which inhibited AKT phosphorylation (Fig. 3D) and abolished the growth-promoting effect of PILRB expression, as determined by colony formation assays (Fig. 3E, F). In addition, siAKT abolished the proliferative ability of PILRB-overexpressing GC cells, demonstrating that PILRB promotes GC growth by stimulating the PI3K/AKT pathway (Fig. 3G–I). These results demonstrated that PILRB promotes GC progression by activating the PI3K/AKT pathway.Fig. 3 PILRB stimulates the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in GC cells.

A KEGG pathway enriched by differently expressed genes influenced by PILRB in AGS. B, C Western blotting analysis detected that PILRB knockdown remarkably inhibited AKT phosphorylation while not affecting MEK and ERK phosphorylation, and PILRB overexpression substantially promoted AKT phosphorylation while not affecting MEK and ERK phosphorylation (B). Wild-type PILRB reversed inhibition of AKT phosphorylation caused by PILRB depletion (C). D Western blotting analysis shows that PI3K/AKT inhibitor GDC-0941 treatment decreased AKT phosphorylation. E, F Cell colony formation assays showed that the proliferation ability of GC cells was significantly inhibited by GDC-0941 treatment in PILRB overexpression GC cells (E) Quantitative analysis (F). G Western blotting analysis showing siAKT treatment decreased AKT expression. H, I Cell colony formation assays showed that the proliferation ability of GC cells was significantly inhibited by siAKT treatment in PILRB overexpression GC cells (H) Quantitative analysis (I).

PILRB interacts with and stabilizes IRS4 protein to stimulate PI3K/AKT pathway

To identify proteins that directly interact with PILRB in GC cells, we conducted a co-IP assay followed by LC/MS (Fig. S4A). PILRB-binding candidates were identified by comparing the anti-FLAG-PILRB IP products of FLAG-PILRB-overexpressing cells with those of the control AGS cells (Fig. S4B). Among the identified potential candidates, we focused on IRS4, which plays a central role in the signal transduction of cell surface receptors and the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. The interaction of endogenous PILRB and IRS4 in AGS and HGC-27 cells by immunoprecipitation-Western blotting analyses was confirmed, demonstrating the interaction between PILRB and IRS4 (Fig. 4A). We then evaluated whether PILRB modulated the mRNA or protein levels of IRS4 by interacting with each other. PILRB depletion did not alter IRS4 mRNA levels in GC cells (Fig. 4B). However, in PILRB knockdown AGS and MKN-28 cells, IRS4 protein levels were downregulated, whereas ectopic PILRB expression increased IRS4 protein levels (Fig. 4C). Rescue experiments also showed that IRS4 expression was reversed by overexpression of PILRB (Fig. 4D). These results demonstrated that PILRB increased IRS4 protein levels in GC cells.Fig. 4 PILRB interacts with and stabilizes IRS4 to activate the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in GC cells.

A AGS and HGC-27 cells were treated with MG132 for 8 h and harvested for co-IP assay by western blotting. B The level of IRS4 mRNA expression in PILRB knockdown AGS and MKN-28 cells. C, D PILRB knockdown remarkably inhibited IRS4 protein levels, and PILRB overexpression substantially increased IRS4 protein levels (C). Wild-type PILRB reversed the changes in IRS protein levels caused by PILRB depletion (D). E Representative IHC images (Left) and IHC score (Right) of IRS4 protein levels in tumors and adjacent normal tissues. F Overall survival analysis of 30 GC patients showed that cases with higher IRS4 expression levels had a poorer prognosis (P < 0.05). G, H Representative images of IHC staining (G) and correlational analysis (H) between PILRB and IRS4 IHC score in our patients’ specimens. I–L IRS4 expression levels in GC cells treated with cycloheximide (CHX) for the indicated time points (I, J) and relative protein levels (K, L). M, N Western blotting analysis showing IRS4 expression levels after treatment with MG132 for 4 h in PILRB depletion GC cells.

To explore the relationship between PILRB and IRS4 expression levels in patients with GC, the IHC score showed that IRS4 was more highly expressed in GC tumor tissues than in normal tissues (Fig. 4E). Kaplan–Meier plots revealed that patients with high IRS4 expression showed poor OS, similar to the results in the GEO and TCGA datasets (Fig. 4F and Fig. S5A). More importantly, IRS4 protein levels were positively correlated with PILRB protein levels in GC tissues (Fig. 4G, H). To explore the role of IRS4 in GC, we assessed the growth, migration, and invasion of IRS4-depleted and overexpressed GC cells. The results showed that IRS4 accelerated the proliferation (Fig. S5B) and enhanced the migration and invasion abilities of GC cells (Fig. S5C, D). These results indicate that IRS4 also plays an oncogenic role in patients with GC.

Further experiments showed that IRS4 silencing significantly suppressed the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in GC cells, whereas IRS4 overexpression activated the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway (Fig. S6A). Consistent with the above results, overexpression of IRS4 partly rescued the activation of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in PILRB-depleted GC cells (Fig. S6B), demonstrating that IRS4 is a crucial downstream target of PILRB that activates the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in GC cells.

We next determined the underlying mechanisms by which PILRB upregulates IRS4 expression in GC cells. We found that PILRB maintained the stability of IRS4 in the presence of CHX (Fig. 4I–L). Next, we used the lysosome inhibitor bafilomycin A1 (Baf-A1) and the proteasome inhibitor MG132 and observed that IRS4 degradation was restored by MG132 in AGS cells treated with the protein synthesis inhibitor CHX (Fig. S6C). Analyzing the relationship between IRS4 protein stability and PILRB, we found that treatment with MG132 increased IRS4 expression levels in shNC/shPILRB-1/shPILRB-2 GC cells. Moreover, IRS4 protein levels triggered by proteasome inhibition could not be further decreased by PILRB depletion (Fig. 4M, N). Our data indicate that PILRB upregulates IRS4 expression through the proteasomal pathway.

PILRB relieves IRS4 ubiquitination through deubiquitinase OTUB1

To study whether PILRB affects IRS4 ubiquitination, we performed ubiquitination assays in HEK293T cells with ectopic FLAG-IRS4 and HA-Ub in the presence of MYC-PILRB or siPILRB and found that PILRB decreased the ubiquitination of IRS4 (Fig. 5A, B). To identify the deubiquitinase (DUB) that interacts with IRS4, we used an online database (BioGRID, IntAct) and performed Venn analysis with all known DUBs, and found that OTUB1 and USP9X proteins may potentially interact with IRS4 (Fig. S7A). OTUB1 might bind to IRS4 using protein mass spectrometry [21]. To validate which deubiquitinase binds to IRS4, we transfected V5-OTUB1/USP9X and FLAG-IRS4 vectors into HEK293T cells and performed immunoprecipitation-western blotting, which showed that only OTUB1 could bind to IRS4 (Fig. S7B). We confirmed the interaction between endogenous OTUB1 and IRS4 in AGS and HGC-27 cells using immunoprecipitation-western blotting, demonstrating the interaction between PILRB and OTUB1 (Fig. 5C).Fig. 5 PILRB protects IRS4 from ubiquitin-regulated degradation by combining with OTUB1 in GC cells.

A HEK293T cells were transfected with FLAG-IRS4, PILRB siRNA, and HA-Ub as indicated. Cells were harvested and lysed, immunoprecipitated by FLAG M2 beads, and subjected to immunoblotting with the HA antibody to detect IRS4 ubiquitination. B HEK293T cells were transfected with FLAG-IRS4, PILRB plasmid, and HA-Ub as indicated. Cells were harvested and lysed, immunoprecipitated by FLAG M2 beads, and subjected to immunoblotting with the HA antibody to detect IRS4 ubiquitination. C AGS and HGC-27 cells were treated with MG132 for 8 h and harvested for co-IP assay by western blotting. D HEK293T cells were transfected with FLAG-IRS4, MYC-PILRB, V5-OTUB1, and HA-Ub as indicated. Cells were harvested and lysed, immunoprecipitated by FLAG M2 beads, which showed that PILRB increased OTUB1 binding to IRS4. E Endogenous Co-IP of IRS4 in AGS-shNC/AGS-shPILRB-1/2. Immunoblotting assay showed that OTUB1 binding to IRS4 was reduced in PILRB depletion AGS cells. F HEK293T cells were transfected with FLAG-IRS4, siPILRB, V5-OTUB1, and HA-Ub as indicated. Cells were harvested and lysed, immunoprecipitated by FLAG M2 beads, and subjected to immunoblotting with the HA antibody to detect IRS4 ubiquitination. G Co-IP assay was performed to analyze the ubiquitination of IRS4 in HEK293T cell cotransfected with FLAG-IRS4 and HA-Ub or its lysine residue mutants HA-Ub K48 or K63 together with or without V5-OTUB1. H AGS-Vector/AGS-PILRB cells were transiently transfected with V5-OTUB-Con/WT/D88A and FLAG-IRS4 plasmids. Immunoblotting assay showed that the IRS4 protein in the WT group was more stable compared to the D88A group.

We also explored whether the interaction between OTUB1 and IRS4 was influenced by PILRB and found that OTUB1 bound to IRS4 was significantly increased by MYC-PILRB (Fig. 5D). To further validate this, we conducted endogenous immunoprecipitation-western blotting assays in AGS cells in which PILRB was stably knocked down. The results showed that OTUB1 binding to IRS4 decreased with PILRB deficiency (Fig. 5E). We then sought to explore whether PILRB regulated the deubiquitination of IRS4 by impacting IRS4 binding to OTUB1. Our results revealed that the knockdown of PILRB reversed OTUB1-mediated deubiquitination of IRS4 (Fig. 5F).

To determine the deubiquitination of IRS4 by OTUB1, FLAG-IRS4, and HA-Ub K48 or K63 mutants were co-transfected with or without V5-OTUB1 into HEK293T cells. As shown in the results (Fig. 5G), OTUB1 decreased the ubiquitination of IRS4 in the presence of the WT and the K48-Ub mutant, but not in the presence of the K63-Ub mutant, demonstrating that OTUB1 removes the K48-linked polyubiquitination chains on IRS4.

OTUB1 stabilizes target proteins by inhibiting E2-conjugating enzymes. The D88 site of OTUB1 has been shown to be important for its deubiquitinase activity of OTUB1. Mutating the D88 site to A (D88A) attenuates the deubiquitinase function of OTUB1. To explore whether the PILRB-stabilizing IRS4 protein relies on OTUB1 deubiquitinase function, we transfected the D88A mutant of OTUB1 into vector- or PILRB-stable GC cells and found that the IRS4 protein in the OTUB1-WT group was more stable. However, the IRS4 protein was remarkably reduced in the OTUB1-D88A group, and this difference was more significant after PILRB overexpression (Fig. 5H). These results demonstrate that OTUB1 exerts its deubiquitin function by inhibiting the E2-conjugating enzyme leading to the stabilization of IRS4 protein.

The oncogenic role of PILRB largely dependent on IRS4

To investigate the effects of IRS4 on PILRB-regulated cell proliferation and metastasis, AGS and MKN-28 cells stably transfected with shPILRB or shNC were transfected with IRS4 overexpression, and HGC-27 and MGC-803 cells stably transfected with PILRB or vector were transfected with shIRS4. Western blotting was performed to validate the transfection efficiency of these GC cells (Fig. 6A, B). As expected, IRS4 overexpression reversed the suppression of proliferation (Fig. 6C), clonogenicity (Fig. 6D, E), migration, and invasion (Fig. 6F, G) of AGS and MKN-28 cells induced by PILRB depletion. Consistent with the above results, IRS4 knockdown in GC cells remarkably abolished the promoting function of PILRB on the proliferation (Fig. 6H), clonogenicity (Fig. 6I, J), migration and invasion abilities of HGC-27 and MGC-803 cells (Fig. 6K, L). These findings confirm that the oncogenic effect of PILRB on GC cells is partially dependent on IRS4 expression.Fig. 6 PILRB mediates IRS4 protein stability to promote proliferation and metastasis in GC cells in vitro.

A, B WB analysis displaying IRS4 expression levels after IRS4 or shIRS4 transfer in PILRB-depleted or PILRB-overexpressed GC cells. C CCK8 assays were performed to explore the proliferation ability of AGS-shNC/AGS-shPILRB treated with vector and IRS4 as indicated. D, E Cell colony formation assays were performed in MKN-28-shNC/MKN-28-shPILRB treated with vector and IRS4 as indicated and quantitatively analyzed (E). F, G The ability of migration and invasion were performed in shNC/ shPILRB GC cells treated with vector and IRS4 as indicated (F), and quantitatively analyzed (G). H CCK8 assays were performed to explore the proliferation ability of HGC-27-vector/AGS-PILRB treated with shNC and shIRS4 as indicated. I, J Cell colony formation assays were performed in MGC-803-vector/ MGC-803-PILRB treated with shNC and shIRS4 as indicated (I), and quantitatively analyzed (J). K, L The ability of migration and invasion were performed in vector/ PILRB GC cells treated with shNC and shIRS4 as indicated (K), and quantitatively analyzed (L).

PILRB augments cholesterol biosynthesis

Interestingly, we also noticed that cholesterol metabolism was also enriched in our transcriptome sequencing data by GSEA analysis, possibly suggesting the stimulation of cholesterol biosynthesis by PILRB expression in GC cells (Fig. 7A). To further explore the mechanism underlying the role of PILRB in involving cholesterol metabolism, we firstly detected the levels of cholesterol in GC cells and observed a significant reduction in cholesterol synthesis (Fig. 7B). Furthermore, the expression of ABCA1, which can induce efflux of cholesterol, was increased, while SCARB1, which mediates selective uptake or influx of HDL-derived cholesteryl esters into cells and tissues was reduced after PILRB depletion in GC cells. Consistently, the expression of ABCA1 was reduced while SCARB1 was elevated after PILRB overexpression in GC cells (Fig. 7C, D). These results proved that PILRB promote cholesterol biosynthesis through regulating the enzyme associated with cholesterol metabolism.Fig. 7 PILRB augments cholesterol biosynthesis in GC cells.

A GSEA analysis of our transcriptome sequencing data enriched the cholesterol metabolism. B Levels of total cholesterol and free cholesterol in GC cells with PILRB depletion and overexpression. C, D RT-qPCR (C) and western blotting (D) analysis showing the ABCA1 and SCARB1 expression levels after PILRB depletion and overexpression of GC cells. E, F Cell colony formation assays showed that the proliferation ability of GC cells was significantly inhibited by simvastatin treatment in PILRB overexpression GC cells (E) and quantitatively analyzed (F). G, H PILRB overexpression GC cells were treated with simvastatin (20 μM), and apoptosis was analyzed with FACS (G) and quantitatively analyzed (H).

Since cholesterol is very important for sustaining membrane integrity and cell viability, a widely prescribed medication-simvastatin was used to control GC progression by inhibiting cholesterol levels. However, the results are still controversial, especially since there are no biomarkers to evaluate the efficacy of simvastatin therapy in GC patients. As we verified PILRB expression could increase cholesterol levels in GC cells, we investigated the involvement of PILRB regarding sensitivity to simvastatin. Ectopic expression of PILRB in GC cells clearly leads to resistance to simvastatin by colony formation assay (Fig. 7E, F). Furthermore, PILRB-overexpression GC cells led to a significant decrease in the percentage of apoptotic cells (Annexin-V/PI) caused by simvastatin (Fig. 7G, H). Together, these results confirmed PILRB-induced simvastatin resistance via elevating the cholesterol level in GC cells and indicate that PILRB may be a novel target for simvastatin treatment in GC patients.

PILRB promotes tumorigenicity and metastasis in vivo

Based on the in vitro findings, we explored the effects of PILRB on GC promotion in vivo. The results showed that PILRB-depleted AGS/MKN-28 cells significantly suppressed the increase in tumor volume over the entire assay period and decreased the final tumor weight in the subcutaneous xenograft models (Fig. 8A, B). PILRB knockdown was verified by IHC staining of AGS xenografts. Cell proliferation was remarkably inhibited, as shown by Ki-67 staining, in PILRB-depleted xenografts compared with controls. IRS4 expression levels were also downregulated in PILRB-depleted cells (Fig. S8A–C).Fig. 8 Effects of PILRB on GC cell growth and metastasis in vivo.

A, B Photograph, and quantification of excised subcutaneous tumors obtained by injecting shNC versus shPILRB in two GC cell lines (n = 8 mice per group). C, D Representative specimen, and H&E staining images of the metastatic nodules of shNC versus shPILRB in two GC cell lines in the lung (C) and quantitatively analyzed (D). E, F Representative images of lymph nodes invaded by AGS-shNC/AGS-shPILRB cells with quantification of volume (E) and validated by CK7 IHC staining (F).

We used nude mice to develop a lung metastasis model. Compared to mice in which the tail vein was injected with AGS and MKN-28-shPILRB cells, mice injected with AGS and MKN-28-shNC cells developed more lung metastatic nodes, confirmed through histologic examination (Fig. 8C, D). To further confirm the effects of PILRB on the lymphatic metastasis of GC, we used nude mice to establish a popliteal LN metastasis model. PILRB-depleted cells were injected into the footpads of nude mice. As expected, we found that PILRB depletion in GC cells resulted in smaller popliteal lymph nodes than in the shNC group (Fig. 8E). As cytokeratin 7 (CK7) is a specific marker for cancer cells, we examined the metastatic ratio via CK7. The results showed that the PILRB depletion group showed a remarkably lower lymphatic metastatic ratio (Fig. 8F). Taken together, the xenograft mouse models verified that PILRB promotes tumorigenesis and metastasis in GC cells.

Discussion

PILRB was previously shown to be expressed mainly in NK cells, dendritic cells, and macrophages and is associated with the regulation of the biological functions of immune cells. However, to the best of our knowledge, its expression and functional roles in cancer cells have never been evaluated. In our report, we verified that PILRB was upregulated in gastric tumors compared to adjacent normal tissues, and its upregulation predicts poor survival outcomes. However, we observed no significant difference in the expression of PILRB protein in the tumor tissues of GC patients with and without metastasis by western blot (Fig. S1A), which might be caused by the limited number of GC patients with metastasis. In the future, a larger clinical sample cohort size would be valuable to verify the expression of the PILRB protein of GC patients in the tumor tissues of GC patients with and without metastasis Therefore, we investigated the oncogenic role of PILRB in GC cells both in vitro and in vivo. Depletion of PILRB in AGS and MKN-28 cells significantly inhibited cell proliferation and colony formation. Conversely, PILRB overexpression GC cells exhibited the opposite effects. Metastasis is a multistep process in which tumor cells undergo EMT, break away from their primary site, travel through the lymph or blood system, and arrive in and colonize new parts of the body. To build secondary tumors in tissue sites that lie some distance from the primary tumor, motile cancer cells must enter the blood vessels or lymphatic systems. After the invasion, it is very important for dissemination that motile cancer cells settle in adjacent lymph nodes instead of immediately moving to a distant tissue site. Lymph node metastasis is thought to be closely associated with the ability of cancer cells to build secondary tumors and is widely recognized as a key criterion in determining the cancer stage. We found overexpression of PILRB in HGC-27 and MGC-803 cells significantly enhanced their migratory and invasive abilities. Conversely, PILRB deficiency inhibited the ability of AGS and MKN-28 cell migration and invasion. Consistent with the in vitro results, lymph node metastasis, and tail vein metastasis models were established to validate the oncogenic role of PILRB in GC cells by injecting PILRB-deficient GC cells. Collectively, we verified that PILRB knockdown inhibited GC cell growth and metastatic potential in vitro and in vivo.

To further examine the molecular mechanism of PILRB-mediated oncogenic factors in GC, we identified the PI3K/AKT pathway as the major downstream signaling pathway underlying the oncogenic function of PILRB in GC cells. The PI3K/AKT pathway is known to play a critical role in cancer progression. Dysfunction of this pathway is associated with various diseases, including malignant tumors [22]. Previous studies reported that patients with GC show abnormal activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway, which may provide potential therapeutic targets for GC [23]. However, the mechanisms underlying the hyperactivation of the PI3K/AKT pathway in GC remains largely unknown. In our study, we elucidated that aberrant expression of PILRB in GC cells could induce abnormal activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway by stabilizing IRS4 protein. IRS4 is a member of the IRS family consisting of four closely related members, IRS1-IRS4, and two distant relatives, IRS5/DOK4 and IRS6/DOK5. IRS4 was first identified and characterized in the HEK293T human embryonic kidney cell line, where it responds to insulin [24]. However, in breast cancer cells, IRS4 can induce constitutive PI3K/AKT hyperactivation even in the absence of insulin or growth factors [25]. As a constitutively active gene, the expression level of IRS4 is strictly regulated by the transcriptional and translational levels in cells. Moloney murine leukemia virus (MuLV)-induced and mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV)-induced insertional mutagenesis screens always target IRS4, leading to the upregulation of IRS4 mRNA expression levels, underscoring the importance of IRS4 in tumorigenesis [25]. In T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and subungual exostosis, chromosomal translocation events promote the activation of IRS4 mRNA transcription [26, 27]. Hsa _circ_0023409 enhances IRS4 expression, promoting GC proliferation and metastasis [28]. IRS4 expression levels were also much higher in HEK293T cells expressing T antigen-like 293T cells and adeno-associated virus (293AAV) than in the parental HEK293T cell line [29]. However, it remains unclear whether IRS4 protein levels are controlled at the translational level. Recently, a study showed that casein kinase 1gamma2 (CK1gamma2) can phosphorylate Ser389 of IRS4, resulting in promoting IRS4 degradation via CHIP through the ubiquitin/lysosome pathway [30]. In the present study, we first performed co-IP of PILRB, followed by protein sequencing for the identification of PILRB functional partners, which identified IRS4 as a potential binding partner. Co-IP assay further confirmed the interaction between PILRB and IRS4. IRS4 was found to be downregulated following deficiency of PILRB, meanwhile IRS4 levels were upregulated by PILRB overexpression in GC cells. Taken together, we illustrated that PILRB hyperactivates the PI3K/AKT pathway by stabilizing the IRS4 protein.

Next, we explored the molecular mechanisms through which PILRB stabilizes IRS4 in GC cells. Our results showed that IRS4 mRNA was not altered when PILRB was knocked down or overexpressed, while IRS4 protein levels were elevated in PILRB overexpression in GC cells, suggesting that PILRB could stabilize IRS4 protein levels via post-translational modification. Cellular protein degradation is primarily caused by autophagy or the ubiquitin-proteasome (UPS) system. To identify the pathway through which PILRB regulates IRS4 protein levels, we treated GC cells with CHX, a protein synthesis inhibitor. In PILRB-overexpressing GC cells, we found that the degradation of IRS4 was markedly reduced compared to that in the vector group, demonstrating that PILRB regulates IRS4 protein levels depending on the stability of the UPS system. Furthermore, MG132 significantly reduced the ubiquitination of IRS4 in PILRB-overexpressing GC cells, revealing that PILRB stabilizes the IRS4 protein by reducing the ubiquitination of IRS4. We further used two online tools to predict the deubiquitinase DUB that interacts and stabilizes with IRS4. The results showed that OTUB1 might potentially interact with IRS4. Next, we demonstrated that PILRB relieves the ubiquitination of IRS4 through OTUB1, thereby increasing IRS4 protein expression.

Ovarian tumor domain-containing ubiquitin aldehyde binding protein 1 (OTUB1) is a non-canonical DUB that regulates specific ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (E2S), which is involved in the malignant progression of different types of tumors [31]. As a tumor suppressor, OTUB1 suppresses cell proliferation and triggers p53-dependent apoptosis by regulating the DNA damage response [32]. However, OTUB1 can facilitate the development of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by stabilizing the SNAIL protein [33]. OTUB1 also plays a crucial role in checkpoints during T cell-mediated antitumor immune responses [34]. To the best of our knowledge, this study represents the first investigation demonstrating that PILRB can recruit OTUB1 to stabilize IRS4 protein, thereby promoting GC progression.

Some studies have showed the anti-tumor effect of GC cells treatment of in virto, however, clinical trials in GC patients have no positive comes based on those preclinical results [35], which highlights the urgent need for novel predictive biomarkers of the efficacy of statins to treat GC. In our study, we found that PILRB could increase the cellular cholesterol level by altering the expression levels of ABCA1 and SCARB1 to induce resistance to statin therapy. All results demonstrate that clinical trials did not preselect GC patients with high PILRB levels may have limited the positive outcome. Hence, clinical trials with selective enrollment are suggested to consider the expression level of PILRB+ tumors. Previous studies showed that the PI3K/AKT pathway activated cholesterol metabolism through posttranslational regulation to regulate the expression level of ABCA1 and SCARB1 in the cell surface of HepG2 [36]. However, our results show that PILRB could regulate the expression level of ABCA1 and SCARB1 in GC cells, which suggests that other molecular mechanisms might regulate the expression level of ABCA1 and SCARB1 in GC cells independent of IRS4-mediated stimulation of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway.

Overall, this study unveils that PILRB acts as an oncogenic protein to interact with IRS4 and recruit OTUB1 to deubiquitinate and stabilize IRS4, leading to PI3K/AKT activation to enhance GC progression. Our work also provides evidence that PILRB may prove to be of wider clinical relevance as a biomarker for PI3K/AKT pathway-dependent GC and other cancers. Moreover, PILRB might be a wider clinical biomarker for lowering cholesterol level-dependent gastric and other cancer types.

Conclusion

The oncogenic role of PILRB is proved in gastric tumorigenesis, providing new insights into the regulation of PI3K/AKT signaling in GC and establishing PILRB as a biomarker for simvastatin therapy resistance in GC.

Data sharing

Any reasonable requests for access to available data underlying the results reported in this article will be considered. Such proposals should be submitted to the corresponding author.

Supplementary Information

See Table S1–S2, Figures S1–S8 in the Supplementary Material for comprehensive image analysis.

Supplementary information

supplementary information

Raw western blot data

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41419-024-07026-5.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: XW, YYL, QYZ, XW, XYC, LH, SDT, ZMP, XJH, TW, ZZ, FFT, SH, JR, LXC, and ZZ; methodology: XW, YYL, QYZ, and XW; investigation: XYC, LH, and SDT; writing and visualization: XW, YYL, JR, LXC, and ZZ; funding acquisition: ZZ; resources: ZZ and LXC; supervision: SH and ZZ.

Fundings

Jiangxi provincial Department of Science (Nos. 20232BAB216074, 20212BCJL23056, and 20232BCJ22057) and Clinical Research Innovation Plan of Shanghai General Hospital (grant No. CTCCR-2021C13) and Shanghai Anticancer Association EYAS PROJECT (SACA-CY22B04).

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics

This paper describes studies involving human participants, human data, or human tissue, and all the samples were approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai General Hospital (20230114125437975). Written informed consent for using clinical information and tissue samples was obtained from all patients. All animal experiments were approved by the Ethics Committee of Jiangxi Provincial People’s Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, China.

Edited by Angelo Peschiaroli

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Xing Wang, Yuanyuan Liu, Qiuyan Zhao, Xin Wang
==== Refs
References

1. Sung H Ferlay J Siegel RL Laversanne M Soerjomataram I Jemal A Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries CA Cancer J Clin 2021 71 209 49 10.3322/caac.21660 33538338
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49.33538338 10.3322/caac.21660
2. Smyth EC Nilsson M Grabsch HI van Grieken NC Lordick F Gastric cancer Lancet 2020 396 635 48 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31288-5 32861308
Smyth EC, Nilsson M, Grabsch HI, van Grieken NC, Lordick F. Gastric cancer. Lancet. 2020;396:635–48.32861308 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31288-5
3. Tan P Yeoh KG Genetics and molecular pathogenesis of gastric adenocarcinoma Gastroenterology 2015 149 1153 62.e3 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.05.059 26073375
Tan P, Yeoh KG. Genetics and molecular pathogenesis of gastric adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2015;149:1153–62.e3.26073375 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.05.059
4. Onoyama T Ishikawa S Isomoto H Gastric cancer and genomics: review of literature J Gastroenterol 2022 57 505 16 10.1007/s00535-022-01879-3 35751736
Onoyama T, Ishikawa S, Isomoto H. Gastric cancer and genomics: review of literature. J Gastroenterol. 2022;57:505–16.35751736 10.1007/s00535-022-01879-3
5. Lordick F Carneiro F Cascinu S Fleitas T Haustermans K Piessen G Gastric cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up Ann Oncol 2022 33 1005 20 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.004 35914639
Lordick F, Carneiro F, Cascinu S, Fleitas T, Haustermans K, Piessen G, et al. Gastric cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2022;33:1005–20.35914639 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.004
6. Guan WL He Y Xu RH Gastric cancer treatment: recent progress and future perspectives J Hematol Oncol 2023 16 57 10.1186/s13045-023-01451-3 37245017
Guan WL, He Y, Xu RH. Gastric cancer treatment: recent progress and future perspectives. J Hematol Oncol. 2023;16:57.37245017 10.1186/s13045-023-01451-3
7. Li GZ Doherty GM Wang J Surgical management of gastric cancer: a review JAMA Surg 2022 157 446 54 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.0182 35319717
Li GZ, Doherty GM, Wang J. Surgical management of gastric cancer: a review. JAMA Surg. 2022;157:446–54.35319717 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.0182
8. Wu S Chen M Huang J Zhang F Lv Z Jia Y ORAI2 promotes gastric cancer tumorigenicity and metastasis through PI3K/Akt signaling and MAPK-dependent focal adhesion disassembly Cancer Res 2021 81 986 1000 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-0049 33310726
Wu S, Chen M, Huang J, Zhang F, Lv Z, Jia Y, et al. ORAI2 promotes gastric cancer tumorigenicity and metastasis through PI3K/Akt signaling and MAPK-dependent focal adhesion disassembly. Cancer Res. 2021;81:986–1000.33310726 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-0049
9. Li LZ Han LX Wang JK Wang L Liu D Yang XQ Cloning and identification of splice variants of the porcine PILRA gene Yi Chuan 2015 37 926 31 26399532
Li LZ, Han LX, Wang JK, Wang L, Liu D, Yang XQ. Cloning and identification of splice variants of the porcine PILRA gene. Yi Chuan. 2015;37:926–31.26399532
10. Yang XQ Jing XY Zhang CX Song YF Liu D Isolation and characterization of porcine PILRB gene and its alternative splicing variants Gene 2018 672 8 15 10.1016/j.gene.2018.06.008 29879501
Yang XQ, Jing XY, Zhang CX, Song YF, Liu D. Isolation and characterization of porcine PILRB gene and its alternative splicing variants. Gene. 2018;672:8–15.29879501 10.1016/j.gene.2018.06.008
11. Zheng L Han X Yao S Zhu Y Klement J Wu S The CD8alpha-PILRalpha interaction maintains CD8(+) T cell quiescence Science 2022 376 996 1001 10.1126/science.aaz8658 35617401
Zheng L, Han X, Yao S, Zhu Y, Klement J, Wu S, et al. The CD8alpha-PILRalpha interaction maintains CD8(+) T cell quiescence. Science. 2022;376:996–1001.35617401 10.1126/science.aaz8658
12. Mousseau DD Banville D L’Abbe D Bouchard P Shen SH PILRalpha, a novel immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif-bearing protein, recruits SHP-1 upon tyrosine phosphorylation and is paired with the truncated counterpart PILRbeta J Biol Chem 2000 275 4467 74 10.1074/jbc.275.6.4467 10660620
Mousseau DD, Banville D, L’Abbe D, Bouchard P, Shen SH. PILRalpha, a novel immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif-bearing protein, recruits SHP-1 upon tyrosine phosphorylation and is paired with the truncated counterpart PILRbeta. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:4467–74.10660620 10.1074/jbc.275.6.4467
13. Tato CM Joyce-Shaikh B Banerjee A Chen Y Sathe M Ewald SE The myeloid receptor PILRbeta mediates the balance of inflammatory responses through regulation of IL-27 production PLoS ONE 2012 7 e31680 10.1371/journal.pone.0031680 22479310
Tato CM, Joyce-Shaikh B, Banerjee A, Chen Y, Sathe M, Ewald SE, et al. The myeloid receptor PILRbeta mediates the balance of inflammatory responses through regulation of IL-27 production. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e31680.22479310 10.1371/journal.pone.0031680
14. Shiratori I Ogasawara K Saito T Lanier LL Arase H Activation of natural killer cells and dendritic cells upon recognition of a novel CD99-like ligand by paired immunoglobulin-like type 2 receptor J Exp Med 2004 199 525 33 10.1084/jem.20031885 14970179
Shiratori I, Ogasawara K, Saito T, Lanier LL, Arase H. Activation of natural killer cells and dendritic cells upon recognition of a novel CD99-like ligand by paired immunoglobulin-like type 2 receptor. J Exp Med. 2004;199:525–33.14970179 10.1084/jem.20031885
15. Banerjee A Stevenaert F Pande K Haghjoo E Antonenko S Gorman DM Modulation of paired immunoglobulin-like type 2 receptor signaling alters the host response to Staphylococcus aureus-induced pneumonia Infect Immun 2010 78 1353 63 10.1128/IAI.00969-09 20065029
Banerjee A, Stevenaert F, Pande K, Haghjoo E, Antonenko S, Gorman DM, et al. Modulation of paired immunoglobulin-like type 2 receptor signaling alters the host response to Staphylococcus aureus-induced pneumonia. Infect Immun. 2010;78:1353–63.20065029 10.1128/IAI.00969-09
16. Broadfield LA Pane AA Talebi A Swinnen JV Fendt SM Lipid metabolism in cancer: new perspectives and emerging mechanisms Dev Cell 2021 56 1363 93 10.1016/j.devcel.2021.04.013 33945792
Broadfield LA, Pane AA, Talebi A, Swinnen JV, Fendt SM. Lipid metabolism in cancer: new perspectives and emerging mechanisms. Dev Cell. 2021;56:1363–93.33945792 10.1016/j.devcel.2021.04.013
17. Luo J Yang H Song BL Mechanisms and regulation of cholesterol homeostasis Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2020 21 225 45 10.1038/s41580-019-0190-7 31848472
Luo J, Yang H, Song BL. Mechanisms and regulation of cholesterol homeostasis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21:225–45.31848472 10.1038/s41580-019-0190-7
18. King RJ Singh PK Mehla K The cholesterol pathway: impact on immunity and cancer Trends Immunol 2022 43 78 92 10.1016/j.it.2021.11.007 34942082
King RJ, Singh PK, Mehla K. The cholesterol pathway: impact on immunity and cancer. Trends Immunol. 2022;43:78–92.34942082 10.1016/j.it.2021.11.007
19. Jiang Y Sun A Zhao Y Ying W Sun H Yang X Proteomics identifies new therapeutic targets of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma Nature 2019 567 257 61 10.1038/s41586-019-0987-8 30814741
Jiang Y, Sun A, Zhao Y, Ying W, Sun H, Yang X, et al. Proteomics identifies new therapeutic targets of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Nature. 2019;567:257–61.30814741 10.1038/s41586-019-0987-8
20. Singh PP Singh S Statins are associated with reduced risk of gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Ann Oncol 2013 24 1721 30 10.1093/annonc/mdt150 23599253
Singh PP, Singh S. Statins are associated with reduced risk of gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:1721–30.23599253 10.1093/annonc/mdt150
21. Scholz CC Rodriguez J Pickel C Burr S Fabrizio JA Nolan KA FIH regulates cellular metabolism through hydroxylation of the deubiquitinase OTUB1 PLoS Biol 2016 14 e1002347 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002347 26752685
Scholz CC, Rodriguez J, Pickel C, Burr S, Fabrizio JA, Nolan KA, et al. FIH regulates cellular metabolism through hydroxylation of the deubiquitinase OTUB1. PLoS Biol. 2016;14:e1002347.26752685 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002347
22. He Y Sun MM Zhang GG Yang J Chen KS Xu WW Targeting PI3K/Akt signal transduction for cancer therapy Signal Transduct Target Ther 2021 6 425 10.1038/s41392-021-00828-5 34916492
He Y, Sun MM, Zhang GG, Yang J, Chen KS, Xu WW, et al. Targeting PI3K/Akt signal transduction for cancer therapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6:425.34916492 10.1038/s41392-021-00828-5
23. Fattahi S Amjadi-Moheb F Tabaripour R Ashrafi GH Akhavan-Niaki H PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in gastric cancer: epigenetics and beyond Life Sci 2020 262 118513 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118513 33011222
Fattahi S, Amjadi-Moheb F, Tabaripour R, Ashrafi GH, Akhavan-Niaki H. PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in gastric cancer: epigenetics and beyond. Life Sci. 2020;262:118513.33011222 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118513
24. Fantin VR Sparling JD Slot JW Keller SR Lienhard GE Lavan BE Characterization of insulin receptor substrate 4 in human embryonic kidney 293 cells J Biol Chem 1998 273 10726 32 10.1074/jbc.273.17.10726 9553137
Fantin VR, Sparling JD, Slot JW, Keller SR, Lienhard GE, Lavan BE. Characterization of insulin receptor substrate 4 in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:10726–32.9553137 10.1074/jbc.273.17.10726
25. Ikink GJ Boer M Bakker ER Hilkens J IRS4 induces mammary tumorigenesis and confers resistance to HER2-targeted therapy through constitutive PI3K/AKT-pathway hyperactivation Nat Commun 2016 7 13567 10.1038/ncomms13567 27876799
Ikink GJ, Boer M, Bakker ER, Hilkens J. IRS4 induces mammary tumorigenesis and confers resistance to HER2-targeted therapy through constitutive PI3K/AKT-pathway hyperactivation. Nat Commun. 2016;7:13567.27876799 10.1038/ncomms13567
26. Karrman K Isaksson M Paulsson K Johansson B The insulin receptor substrate 4 gene (IRS4) is mutated in paediatric T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia Br J Haematol 2011 155 516 9 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2011.08709.x 21517825
Karrman K, Isaksson M, Paulsson K, Johansson B. The insulin receptor substrate 4 gene (IRS4) is mutated in paediatric T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2011;155:516–9.21517825 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2011.08709.x
27. Mertens F Moller E Mandahl N Picci P Perez-Atayde AR Samson I The t(X;6) in subungual exostosis results in transcriptional deregulation of the gene for insulin receptor substrate 4 Int J Cancer 2011 128 487 91 10.1002/ijc.25353 20340132
Mertens F, Moller E, Mandahl N, Picci P, Perez-Atayde AR, Samson I, et al. The t(X;6) in subungual exostosis results in transcriptional deregulation of the gene for insulin receptor substrate 4. Int J Cancer. 2011;128:487–91.20340132 10.1002/ijc.25353
28. Li J Yang Y Xu D Cao L hsa_circ_0023409 accelerates gastric cancer cell growth and metastasis through regulating the IRS4/PI3K/AKT pathway Cell Transpl 2021 30 963689720975390 10.1177/0963689720975390
Li J, Yang Y, Xu D, Cao L. hsa_circ_0023409 accelerates gastric cancer cell growth and metastasis through regulating the IRS4/PI3K/AKT pathway. Cell Transpl. 2021;30:963689720975390.10.1177/0963689720975390
29. Hoxhaj G Dissanayake K MacKintosh C Effect of IRS4 levels on PI 3-kinase signalling PLoS ONE 2013 8 e73327 10.1371/journal.pone.0073327 24039912
Hoxhaj G, Dissanayake K, MacKintosh C. Effect of IRS4 levels on PI 3-kinase signalling. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e73327.24039912 10.1371/journal.pone.0073327
30. Li X Zhong L Wang Z Chen H Liao D Zhang R Phosphorylation of IRS4 by CK1gamma2 promotes its degradation by CHIP through the ubiquitin/lysosome pathway Theranostics 2018 8 3643 53 10.7150/thno.26021 30026872
Li X, Zhong L, Wang Z, Chen H, Liao D, Zhang R, et al. Phosphorylation of IRS4 by CK1gamma2 promotes its degradation by CHIP through the ubiquitin/lysosome pathway. Theranostics. 2018;8:3643–53.30026872 10.7150/thno.26021
31. Liao Y Yang M Wang K Wang Y Zhong B Jiang N Deubiquitinating enzyme OTUB1 in immunity and cancer: good player or bad actor? Cancer Lett 2022 526 248 58 10.1016/j.canlet.2021.12.002 34875341
Liao Y, Yang M, Wang K, Wang Y, Zhong B, Jiang N. Deubiquitinating enzyme OTUB1 in immunity and cancer: good player or bad actor? Cancer Lett. 2022;526:248–58.34875341 10.1016/j.canlet.2021.12.002
32. Sun XX Dai MS Deubiquitinating enzyme regulation of the p53 pathway: a lesson from Otub1 World J Biol Chem 2014 5 75 84 10.4331/wjbc.v5.i2.75 24920999
Sun XX, Dai MS. Deubiquitinating enzyme regulation of the p53 pathway: a lesson from Otub1. World J Biol Chem. 2014;5:75–84.24920999 10.4331/wjbc.v5.i2.75
33. Zhou H Liu Y Zhu R Ding F Cao X Lin D OTUB1 promotes esophageal squamous cell carcinoma metastasis through modulating Snail stability Oncogene 2018 37 3356 68 10.1038/s41388-018-0224-1 29559747
Zhou H, Liu Y, Zhu R, Ding F, Cao X, Lin D, et al. OTUB1 promotes esophageal squamous cell carcinoma metastasis through modulating Snail stability. Oncogene. 2018;37:3356–68.29559747 10.1038/s41388-018-0224-1
34. Zhou X Yu J Cheng X Zhao B Manyam GC Zhang L The deubiquitinase Otub1 controls the activation of CD8(+) T cells and NK cells by regulating IL-15-mediated priming Nat Immunol 2019 20 879 89 10.1038/s41590-019-0405-2 31182807
Zhou X, Yu J, Cheng X, Zhao B, Manyam GC, Zhang L, et al. The deubiquitinase Otub1 controls the activation of CD8(+) T cells and NK cells by regulating IL-15-mediated priming. Nat Immunol. 2019;20:879–89.31182807 10.1038/s41590-019-0405-2
35. Su CH Islam MM Jia G Wu CC Statins and the risk of gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis J Clin Med 2022 11 7180 10.3390/jcm11237180 36498753
Su CH, Islam MM, Jia G, Wu CC. Statins and the risk of gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2022;11:7180.36498753 10.3390/jcm11237180
36. Huang CX Zhang YL Wang JF Jiang JY Bao JL MCP-1 impacts RCT by repressing ABCA1, ABCG1, and SR-BI through PI3K/Akt posttranslational regulation in HepG2 cells J Lipid Res 2013 54 1231 40 10.1194/jlr.M032482 23402987
Huang CX, Zhang YL, Wang JF, Jiang JY, Bao JL. MCP-1 impacts RCT by repressing ABCA1, ABCG1, and SR-BI through PI3K/Akt posttranslational regulation in HepG2 cells. J Lipid Res. 2013;54:1231–40.23402987 10.1194/jlr.M032482
