
==== Front
Sci Rep
Sci Rep
Scientific Reports
2045-2322
Nature Publishing Group UK London

38615058
58928
10.1038/s41598-024-58928-5
Article
A current reference-enhanced strategy endows the GFC in DC microgrids better dynamic response
Xie Wenqiang bjxiewenqiang@163.com

1
Zheng Xian 1
Shi Mingming 1
Jia Jiaoxin 2
1 grid.433158.8 0000 0000 8891 7315 State Grid Jiangsu Electric Power Co. LTD. Research Institute, Nanjing, 211100 China
2 https://ror.org/04qr5t414 grid.261049.8 0000 0004 0645 4572 North China Electric Power University, Baoding, 071003 China
13 4 2024
13 4 2024
2024
14 857820 12 2023
4 4 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
The constant voltage strategy (CVS) is more suitable for the small-capacity dc microgrid applications to form the dc bus voltage because it can eliminate the steady voltage deviation. However, its dynamic performance is slowed down by the integrator in the voltage loop and negatively influenced by the load steps. Some advanced methods have been conducted in the literature. However, their principle is to increase the system bandwidth, which is limited because the bandwidth is generally designed about one-tenth of the switching frequency and cannot be increased infinitely. This work pays efforts to increase the gain within the system bandwidth to accelerate the transient response and simultaneously eliminate the influence of the integrator. Therefore, the non-integrator disturbance observer-based (NIDOB) strategy is proposed in this work, and it can feed the load current into the current reference to replace the output of the integrator. Compared to the traditional and non-integrator directly-feedforward (NIDF) strategy, it has a better dynamic performance. Compared to the bandwidth-increased strategy, it does not introduce more noise. The theoretical analysis and experimental results prove its advantages.

Keywords

DC microgrids
Non-integrator control
Current reference enhancement
Dynamic performance
Load disturbances
Subject terms

Electrical and electronic engineering
Energy grids and networks
Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, ChinaBK20230168 BK20230168 BK20230168 Xie Wenqiang Zheng Xian Shi Mingming National Natural Science Foundation of China52207102 Jia Jiaoxin issue-copyright-statement© Springer Nature Limited 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

The popularity of renewable energy and the increasing global demand for power consumption leads to the emergence of dc microgrids1–3. The storage converter plays the role of the grid-forming converter (GFC) in some small-capacity applications such as buildings and residences4,5, to form the bus voltage and balance the power variation caused by the renewable energy and load-steps6,7. In addition, only one GFC can be used in the applications operating in Island mode to form its bus voltage, and it is appropriate to adopt the constant voltage strategy (CVS)8. A multi-branch GFC can be utilized to increase the capacity of a single GFC to meet the requirements9. However, although the CVS can eliminate the steady voltage deviation, its transient response is limited because of the finite system bandwidth as well as the controller limitations.

The input voltage and load variations generally influence the dynamic performance of a GFC. In particular, the load-steps happen much more frequently than the input voltage variations. When a load-step happens, a voltage sag may occur immediately. Therefore, many strategies are explored to improve the dynamic performance of a GFC, such as the average current mode control10, current-programmed mode control11,12, and voltage mode control13. With these control schemes, the influence of the load-steps on the output voltage can be effectively reduced, but it may not be eliminated. The integrator also influences the dynamic performance in the voltage control loop because its output has to change continuously. There has been no work investigating such influence so far. Some studies adopt the feedforward strategy to accelerate the transient response14 adds an auxiliary loop to the original control plant, and15 design the input voltage feed-forward strategy to suppress the input voltage influence. However, the two approaches focus on the specific applications with wide input voltage variation, and the influence of load-steps cannot be eliminated9,16 design a feedforward loop to improve the dynamic response to the voltage sags, but its essence is to increase the bandwidth by adding an additional proportional loop. This approach requires a hysteresis comparator to avoid the negative influence on the steady performance. This method is relatively complicated and limited, since the larger bandwidth brings more noise17,18 propose the inductor current feed-forward strategy to suppress the disturbance of load-steps, but the inductor current cannot completely characterize the load current in the transient state.

The reasons for negatively influencing the dynamic performance of a GFC include the battery voltage variation, load-steps, and the integrator in the voltage loop. However, the battery voltage does not change frequently, and the changing process is very slow. Hence, this work focuses on eliminating the influence of load-steps and the integrator. In this study, it is found that the most effective approach to achieve these aims is to increase the gain within the designed system bandwidth. A new variable is discovered to replace the output of the integrator, rather than increasing the system bandwidth to allow more noise19–21. The domain within the system bandwidth is named the intermediate-frequency (IF) band, which refers to the frequency domain from zero to the cut-off frequency of the system. An easy method comes out that the load current is directly fed into the current reference (named integrator-included DF strategy) to replace the output of the integrator, which works effectively and increases the gain over the IF-band, but it needs an extra sensor. A soft method that can avoid using the extra sensor is to design an observer to acquire the load current and then to feed it as the current reference22,23. The method operates by lumping all the internal uncertainties and external disturbances as a whole and then estimates that through an observer. Then the observation value can be transmitted into the baseline for an advanced controller24. Based on these merits, the non-integrator disturbance observer-based (NIDOB) strategy is proposed to realize the CVS and improve the dynamic performance of a GFC.

This work contributes to proposing a novel CVS, which can quickly respond to load disturbances and eliminate the influence of the integrator. The NIDOB strategy is proposed and designed in detail to achieve these two aims The gain over the IF band is increased but the bandwidth is not enlarged, so that the dynamic performance can be improved without introducing more noise consequences. Further theoretical analysis shows that the feedforward observation can well play the role of the current reference, and the output of the integrator in the voltage loop can converge to the steady zero. Therefore, the integrator can be directly removed. The NIDOB strategy is compared to the traditional and the non-integrator DF (NIDF) strategy. The locus comparison shows that the NIDOB strategy has the fastest dynamic performance and largest stability margin. In addition, it is also compared to the bandwidth-increased strategy19,20, and the result indicates that the NIDOB strategy has a larger gain over the IF domain than the bandwidth-increased method. It can be concluded that it has a better dynamic performance under the same bandwidth unless the latter tolerates more noises.

This paper is structured as follows. Section 2 constructs the system model from the controller and physical system perspectives, then analyzes the reasons for the slow transient response of a GFC. Section 3 proposes two feasible methods and compares them with each other, and then finds out the NIDOB strategy can endow a GFC with better dynamic performance. Section 4 theoretically verifies the correctness of removing the integrator in the NIDOB strategy, and compares it to the traditional, NIDF, and bandwidth-increased strategies. Experimental results are presented to prove the advantages of the NIDOB strategy in Sect. 5. Finally, conclusions are drawn in Sect. 6.

Problem formulation

The traditional CVS employed in a GFC can be depicted in Fig. 1, which consists of four units, the voltage controller (VC), current controller (CC), current physical system (CPS), and voltage physical system (VPS). VC and VPS constitute the voltage loop, and CC and CPS constitute the current loop. From Fig. 1, it can be seen that the two proportional-integral (PI) controllers are included, where the inner PI controller (KPIi) for CC and the outer PI controller (KPIu) for VC, respectively. The two PI controllers are separately expressed as1 KPIu=kpu+kiukiuss,KPIi=kpi+kiikiiss.

where kpu and kiu are the proportional and integral parameters in VC, kpi and kii are the proportional and integral parameters in CC, respectively.Figure 1 The traditional CVC system. (a) An employed circuit of GFC. (b) The diagram of controller. (c) The physical system.

In this traditional CVS, the output can be depicted as2 uC=GUuUref+Giuiload,

where3 GUu=EKPIuKPIisCsL+KPIiE+EKPIuKPIi+1Giu=-sL+KPIiEsCsL+KPIiE+EKPIuKPIi+1.

Therefore, the bus voltage (uC) will be inversely influenced by the load current (iload). When a voltage variation happens, the KPIu will generate the current reference (iref) for the inner current loop to achieve voltage deviation-free. The KPIi is utilized to help the output current (iL) track iref, so as to speed the current response.

If practical applications show poor dynamical performance, it is mainly due to an improperly tuned current loop. Therefore16, improves the dynamic performance by increasing the proportional gain of the current loop. However, it increases the inner bandwidth, and reduces the ability of anti-disturbance. In terms of parameter design, the bandwidth of the inner loop is generally designed one-tenth of the switching frequency and wider than that of the outer loop. Following the above rule, KPIi can tightly track iref and does not introduce important noises. The dynamic performance is up to whether the KPIu can immediately generate a desired iref. However, the transient response of an integrator is relatively slower than that of a pure proportional compensator. Therefore, this work focuses on generating the desired iref and removing the integrator, instead of increasing the bandwidth of the current loop. The reason for the relatively slow transient response of the traditional CVS is detailly analyzed as follows.

The output of integrator changes continuously

The reason for the integrator in KPIu slowing the dynamic performance is first explained. Since the KPIu can achieve zero-deviation regulation, it can be considered that iL = iref and uC = Uref in the steady-state. Assuming the system reaches a steady-state at t = t1, iref can be calculated as4 ireft1=∫01kiuUref-uCtdt,

because the output of the proportional loop is 0. If a load-step happens at this time, the recovery time is needed before the bus voltage goes back to Uref.

Assuming a new steady-state time is t2, then5 ireft2=ireft1+∫t12kiuUref-uCtdt.

It means that the system cannot immediately change from the last steady state to a new one. In other words, since the output of the integrator must change continuously, the instantaneous voltage response will be slowed down.

Current reference limitedly respond the transient components of load disturbance

From Fig. 1, the CPS is coupled with VPS by the uC, which makes it difficult to figure out the relationship between iload and iref. Therefore, a decoupling feedforward is added after KPIi in CC to conveniently illustrate how the control plant slows the load disturbances transmission. The original current loop can be described as6 iL=KPIiEsL+KPIiEiref+-1sL+KPIiEuC,

then, the feedforward can be designed as7 d=uCuCEE

to eliminate the influence of uC, where d denotes the decoupling feedforward. Therefore, the current loop can be described as8 GcI(s)=KPIiEsL+KPIiE=kpis+kiiLLEEs2+kpis+kii,

and the decoupled control system is shown in Fig. 2.Figure 2 The decoupled control system. (a) The voltage loop. (b) The current loop.

From Fig. 2, the transfer properties from iload to iref can be illustrated as9 iref=KPIusC+KPIuGcIsiload+sCKPIusC+KPIuGcIsUref.

It can be derived that10 lims→0sCkPIusC+kPIuGcIs=0,lims→0kPIusC+kPIuGcIs=1.

It means the steady iload can be fully responded by iref. However, the load disturbance is a step-signal, which contains many transient components, expressed as11 Fiload=iloadπδω+1jω.

The current loop bandwidth is limited and only the IF components of iload can be responded, as shown in Fig. 3, which results that the transient |iref| is smaller than the desired value and the bus voltage recovers slowly. Therefore, the most effective approach is to increase the gain over the IF band to enlarge the iref as the black curve shows in Fig. 3, without the extra requirement for phase improvement. In this sense, two strategies are proposed and compared in Sect. 3.Figure 3 The frequency properties of the traditional CVS and the desired gain of an advanced strategy.

Proposed Strategies

In Fig. 2, it can be seen that iref is the output of KPIu and the input of the current loop. But the steady component of iref is only generated by the integrator of KPIu. Therefore, it is necessary to make its steady output zero to remove the integrator. An effective approach is to find a new variable to replace it. In addition, the gain over the IF band should be increased to accelerate the transient response without introducing more noise. Two strategies are proposed as follows.

The NIDF strategy

Considering iref = iL = iload in the steady state, iL and iload can possibly function as substitution variables. However, since iL changes passively with iload, and the change is driven by the controller in GFC, it cannot instantly reflect the transient components of iload. Therefore, the approach that directly feedforwards iload into iref is adopted. Besides, since iload is equal to the steady output of the integrator, the integrator can be directly removed to achieve the non-integrator scheme. In this sense, the PI controller in the voltage loop can be simply designed as a proportional controller, which can be written in, KPIu = kpu.

The NIDF strategy can be depicted in Fig. 4, and the current reference can be expressed as12 iref=sC+kpusC+kpuGcIsiload+sCkpusC+kpuGcIsUref.

Figure 4 The NIDF strategy.

It can be calculated that13 lims→0sC+kpusC+kpuGcIs=1,lims→0sCkpusC+kpuGcIs=0.

It means that the NIDF strategy can effectively feed the load disturbance into iref. Then, the output voltage can be expressed as14 uC=kpuGcIssC+kpuGcIsUref+GcIs-1sC+kpuGcIsiload.

It can be derived that15 lims→0kpuGcIssC+kpuGcIs=1,lims→0GcIs-1sC+kpuGcIs=0.

Therefore, the NIDF strategy can achieve the constant voltage scheme, although the integrator in VC is removed. However, it can be also calculated that16 lims→∞sC+kpusC+kpuGcI=1,

which means that the bandwidth of the NIDF strategy is infinite and more noises can be introduced, which is undesired. Besides, another drawback of this strategy is that it needs an extra sensor to measure iload, which increases the volume and investment cost of a GFC.

The NIDOB strategy

The traditional observer-based method has been utilized in many applications21–23, which can observe the disturbance avoiding using an extra sensor. Since the observer can only be used in the specific structure as shown in Fig. 5, some structure changes of Fig. 2 are made as shown in Fig. 6. Besides, the non-integrator scheme is also achieved through rigid reasoning and design.Figure 5 The typical structure of the observer application.

Figure 6 The NIDOB strategy.

The principle of the traditional observer-based method can be explained as follows. In Fig. 5, Gn(s) is the control plant and Xref(s) is its reference input, X0(s) comes from the controller, Q(s) is a low-pass filter, D(s) is the outer disturbance, and Dob(s) is the observation. The output of the original system without the observer can be expressed as17 Ys=GnsX0s+GnsDs,

and it is influenced by the disturbance. When considering the feedforward of the observer, the output can be expressed as18 Ys=GxysX0s+GdysDs,

where19 Gxys=GnsGnsGns+QsGns-Gns=Gns

and20 Gdys=GnsGns1-QsGns+QsGns-Gns.

Because Q(s) is a low-pass filter, it follows21 lims→0Gdys=0.

Equation (19) implies that the transfer property from the controller to the output is not changed, and (21) implies that the influence of disturbance will be eliminated because it can be observed and fed into the reference to reject the physical change.

The observation can be represented as22 Dobs=-Q(s)Xref+Xref+DsGnsGn-1sQ(s)=Q(s)Ds.

Since Q(s) is a low-pass filter, the transient components over the high-frequency band will be filtered, and the components over the low and the IF band will be observed and fed. It can be derived that23 lims→0Dobs=lims→0Q(s)Ds=lims→0Ds.

Therefore, the observer can be employed in CVS to feed iload into iref. Before this, it is necessary to figure out Gn(s) and Xref(s) first, where Gn(s) comes from the physical system, and Xref(s) comes from the controller.

Comparing Fig. 2 with Fig. 5, let24 Xrefs=irefs,

then, it is needed to move GcI(s) after iload to constitute the equivalent control plant (Gn(s)) together with VPS. Therefore, the equivalent diagram of the NIDOB strategy can be shown in Fig. 6, where the equivalent disturbance and its observation can be expressed as25 Ds=-iload′s=-iloadsGcI-1sDobs=-iload\_ob′s=-iload\_obsGcI-1s.

The equivalent control plant is26 Gns=GcIssC=kpis+kiiLCLCEEs3+Ckpis2+Ckiis.

Substituting (8) into (23), it can be derived that27 lims→0iload′s=lims→0iloadsGcI-1s=iloadlims→0iload\_ob′s=lims→0iload\_obsGcI-1s=iload\_ob.

Therefore, the steady output of the integrator in the voltage loop can be replaced by the observation, and the integrator can be directly removed.

The output of the proposed NIDOB strategy can be expressed as28 uCs=GUusUref-Giusiload′s=GUusUref-GiusGcI-1siloads,

where29 GUus=kpusGnsGnsGns+QsGns-Gns+kpuGnsGns=kpuGns1+kpuGns,

30 GiusGcI-1s=GcI-1sGnsGns1-QsGns+QsGns-Gns+kpuGnsGns=Gns1-QsGcIs+kpuGcIsGns.

Because Q(s) is designed as a low-pass filter, (28) can be stated that31 lims→0GdusGcI-1s=0,

and32 lims→0GUus=kpukpis2+kiikpuLCEs4+Ckpis3+Ckii+kpukpis2+kiikpu=1.

Therefore, although the VC is designed as a proportional controller in the NIDOB strategy, the CVS can be achieved and the load disturbance will be effectively eliminated.

Dynamic comparison

Dynamic comparison of the proposed strategies

According to Fig. 6, the transfer property from iload to iref can be expressed as33 iref=kpuGns+QskpuGns+1iload′+kpukpuGns+1Uref.

Substituting (23) into (30), it can be reformulated that34 iref=kpuGns+QskpuGns+1GcIsiload+kpukpuGns+1Uref.

According to the law of DOB23, since the relative degree of Gn(s) is 2, the Q(s) can be designed as a two-order filter as35 Q(s)=1(τfs+1)2=1(τfs)2+2τfs+1,

and its cut-off frequency can be calculated by36 ωc=(2-1)121τf,

no more than the cut-off frequency (ωs) of the system, where τf is the time constant of Q(s). In this work, the parameters used in the following theoretical analysis and experiment are gathered in Table 1 in Sect. 5, where the switching frequency is 2 kHz, and the ωs is designed about 1000 rad/s. The τf can be calculated by (36) no less than 0.7 ms, but the transient response will slow down as τf increases, hence τf is set as 2 ms in this work.Table 1 Experimental parameters.

Parameter	L (mH)		C(mF)	E(V)	kpu	kiu	kpi	kii	
Value	2.2		1.8	200	1	2	0.01	0.1	

To illustrate the advantages of the NIDOB strategy, the gain of the current references of the three strategies are compared. Substituting (26) into (34) and then comparing it to (12), it can be found that, the components constituted by Uref of (12) and (34) are the same but a bit larger than that of (9), because the integrator exists in the denominator of the components of (9). Therefore, it is needed to solely compare the transient components constituted by iload in (34), (12), and (9). Hence, let39 ctra=KPIusC+KPIuGcIsiloadcDF=kpu+sCsC+kpuGcIsiloadcDOB=kpuGcIs+sCQsGcIssC+kpuGcIsiload.

where ctra denotes the component constituted by iload in (9), cDF denotes that in (12), and cDOB denotes that in (34). The gains over the IF band of the three methods are compared in Fig. 7. It can be seen that the NIDOB strategy has the largest gain over the IF band whereas the traditional strategy has the smallest, which means the NIDOB strategy can respond faster to the load disturbance. In addition, the gain of the NIDOB strategy over the high-frequency band decreases rapidly to reject the noises, which solves the problem caused by the NIDF strategy.Figure 7 The gain comparison of the three methods over the IF band.

Stability comparison of the proposed strategies

According to the parameters listed in Table 1 and the Eqs. (2), (14), and (28), the stability comparison can be rigidly verified by the locus distribution of the three strategies, as shown in Fig. 8. It can be seen that the traditional strategy has two dominant eigenvalues, but the NIDF strategy and the NIDOB strategy only have one dominant eigenvalue. Furthermore, the NIDOB strategy has the smallest dominant eigenvalue and it is almost offset by a zero, but the #1 dominant eigenvalue of the traditional strategy is close to zero. Therefore, the NIDOB strategy has the largest stability margin, but the traditional one has the smallest. In addition, the locus distribution also indicates that the NIDOB strategy has the fastest transient response, whereas the traditional one has the slowest, which is consistent with the dynamic comparison in Fig. 7.Figure 8 Stability comparison of the three strategies.

Comparison of the NIDOB strategy and the Bandwidth-Increased Strategy

Many works improve the dynamic performance by increasing the system bandwidth19,20, which may have a faster dynamic response when load-steps happen, but it cannot recover quickly due to the too many introduced noises. As shown in Fig. 9, with the increase of kpu, the bandwidth of the traditional strategy increases, much larger than that of the NIDOB strategy. However, the gain over the IF band of the NIDOB strategy is larger than that of the bandwidth-increased strategy. Hence, the NIDOB strategy has a better dynamic performance than the bandwidth-increased strategy under the condition of the same bandwidth.Figure 9 Dynamic comparison of the NIDOB strategy and the bandwidth-increased strategy.

Sensitive analysis of the NIDOB strategy

Through analyzing the control structure in Fig. 6, it can be seen the stability of the proposed method is influenced by parameter r, kp, ks, L, C, and τ.

The sensitivity analysis is shown in Fig. 10. The positive number indicates that the parameter will cause the eigenvalues to shift to the right. On the contrary, the negative number indicates that the parameter will cause the eigenvalues to shift to the left. It can be seen that the increasement of r, ks, L, and τ will weaken the stability and the L influence the most. The inductor L will in the equipment are not easily changed, but the control parameter r, ks, and τ is adjustable. Therefore, r, ks, and τ should be set a relatively small value in parameter design.Figure 10 Sensitivity analysis of the real part of the dominant eigenvalue.

Experimental results

An experimental islanded dc microgrid setup, shown in Fig. 11, was used to verify the effectiveness of proposed strategy. The experimental system consists of a dc source, three DC/DC converters (GFCs), LC filters, programmed loads, and a dSPACE controller as well as its monitoring platform. The DC source voltage is 200 V, and the output voltage reference of DC/DC converter is set as 100 V. The sampling frequency of dSPACE controller is 10 kHz, and the switching frequency of DC/DC is set as 1 kHz. The other experimental parameters are shown in Table 1 after stability.Figure 11 Experimental setup.

The three DC/DC converters separately adopt different strategies to make comparisons in experiment cases. In case 1, converter A adopts the NIDF strategy, converter B adopts the integrator-included DF strategy, and converter C adopts the traditional CV strategy. In case 2, converter A adopts the NIDF strategy, converter B adopts the NIDOB strategy, and converter C adopts the DOB-based strategy with integrator. In case 3, only two converters are used. The converter A adopts the bandwidth-increased strategy, and converter B adopts NIDOB strategy.

Case1: effectiveness of the NIDF strategy

The comparison among the NIDF strategy, the integrator-included DF strategy, and the traditional strategy is shown in Fig. 12, where three GFCs adopt different strategies and 500W loads are separately connected and disconnected to three GFCs at t = T1 and t = T2. From Fig. 12(a1), (b1), and (c1), it can be seen that the three strategies have the same steady current reference equal to the load current, hence all of them can realize CVS. However, in the transient process, the NIDF strategy and the integrator-included DF strategy have a bit faster transient response because they have larger current references than the traditional strategy, as shown in Fig. 12(a2). Besides, since we directly introduce the load current into the current reference, they have an almost vertical increment at the moment of loads being connected. In addition, as shown in Fig. 12(a3), since the integrator can sense the voltage deviation and output a part of the current reference, the integrator-included DF strategy can respond faster than the NIDF strategy at the beginning of the transient process. However, because the output of the integrator has to change continuously, its current reference decreases more slowly than the NIDF strategy as the voltage deviation decreases. Therefore, the integrator-included DF strategy will cause a voltage overshoot, whereas the NIDF strategy can reach the steady-state more quickly. As shown in Fig. 12(b2) and (c2), the NIDF strategy reaches the steady-state after 0.5 s, whereas the overshoot of the integrator-included DF strategy has not fully disappeared yet. Therefore, the NIDF strategy has a better dynamic performance, but it needs an extra sensor to measure the load current.Figure 12 The comparison of the NIDF strategy, the integrator-included DF strategy, and the traditional strategy. (a) The waveforms of current reference. (b) The waveforms of dc bus voltage. (c) The waveforms of load current.

Case2: effectiveness of the NIDOB strategy

In Sect. 5 A, the NIDOB strategy has a better dynamic performance. The observer-based strategy with the integrator and the NIDF strategy are compared with it in this case to illustrate the merits of the NIDOB strategy. The loads are connected and disconnected at t = T5 and t = T6, and it can be seen that the NIDOB strategy and the observer-based strategy can generate larger transient current references as shown in Fig. 13(a1)–(a3), hence they have less recovery time and voltage sag as shown in Fig. 13(b1), (b2) and (c1), (c2). As shown in Fig. 13(a2) and (c2), the steady current reference is equal to the load current, hence it is reasonable to directly remove the integrator, which will not influence the realization of CVS. However, since the observation in the observer-based strategy can provide a large enough current reference to make the bus voltage recover very fast, the integrator functions a little and just generates the minor components of the current reference. Therefore, the transient current references of the NIDOB strategy and the observer-based strategy with the integrator overlap with each other (see Fig. 13(a3)), and they have similar dynamic performance (see Fig. 13(b2) and (c2)). Although there is no obvious improvement after removing the integrator, it can simplify the control structure.Figure 13 The comparison of the NIDOB strategy, the observer-based strategy with the integrator, and the NIDF strategy. (a) The waveforms of current reference. (b) The waveforms of dc bus voltage. (c) The waveforms of load current.

Case3: comparison of the NIDOB strategy and the bandwidth-increased strategy

To illustrate the advantage of the NIDOB strategy, the bandwidth-increased strategy is compared to it in Fig. 13, where kpu = 1 in the NIDOB strategy and kpu = 5 in the bandwidth-increased strategy, and the loads are separately connected and disconnected at t = T7 and t = T8. In Fig. 9, the bandwidth of the bandwidth-increased strategy is larger than that of the NIDOB strategy, but its gain over the IF band is smaller than that of the latter. Therefore, the current reference of the bandwidth-increased strategy has a faster response but has a smaller value than that of the NIDOB strategy, as shown in Fig. 14(a1), (a2). Correspondingly, the bandwidth-increased strategy has a smaller voltage sag, but the NIDOB strategy has much less voltage recovery time, as shown in Fig. 14(b1), (b2) and (c1), (c2).Figure 14 The comparison of the NIDOB strategy and the bandwidth-increased strategy. (a) The waveforms of current reference. (b) The waveforms of dc bus voltage. (c) The waveforms of load current.

Case4: Dynamic performance of the NIDOB Strategy under supply voltage disturbance

To evaluate the dynamic performance of the NIDOB strategy under supply voltage disturbance, the validation is conducted in Fig. 15. It can be seen that the supply voltage decreases to 195 V and 190 V separately at t = T9 and t = T10, but the output voltage waveform only produced small fluctuations. Therefore, the proposed strategy has good performance under supply voltage disturbance.Figure 15 Dynamic performance of the NIDOB strategy under supply voltage disturbance.

Case5: Dynamic performance of the NIDOB Strategy under desired voltage disturbance

To evaluate the dynamic performance of the NIDOB strategy under desired voltage disturbance, the validation is conducted in Fig. 16. It can be seen that the desired voltage decreases to 95 V and 90 V separately at t = T11 and t = T12, but the output voltage waveform only produced small fluctuations. Therefore, the proposed strategy has good performance under supply voltage disturbance.Figure 16 Dynamic performance of the NIDOB strategy under desired voltage disturbance.

Summary

The comparison results of the proposed NIDOB strategy and other strategies are summarized in the following Table 2. It can be seen that the proposed NIDOB strategy has better dynamic performance.Table 2 Comparison results of strategies.

The strategies	The results of compared to the NIDOB strategy	
Traditional CV strategy	The NIDOB strategy has faster dynamic performance	
Integrator-included DF strategy	The NIDOB strategy has faster dynamic performance	
NIDF strategy	The NIDOB strategy has faster dynamic performance	
DOB-based strategy with integrator	The two strategies have almost the same dynamic performance, however, the NIDOB strategy has simpler control structure	
Bandwidth-increased strategy	The bandwidth-increased strategy has less voltage sag, however, the NIDOB strategy has much less voltage recovery time	

Conclusion

This paper brings forward a NIDOB strategy to improve the dynamic performance of a GFC. This method feeds the load current into the controller to enhance the current reference to accelerate the transient response. In addition, since the feedforwarded value in the steady-state can completely replace the output of the outer integrator, the integrator can be directly removed and the voltage loop can be simply designed as a proportional controller. The proposed method improves the dynamic performance by increasing the gain over the IF band rather than largely increasing the system bandwidth. Compared to the traditional strategy and the NIDF strategy, the NIDOB strategy has better dynamic performance (the recovery time is reduced from 0.5 s to 0.025 s), and it has a simpler control structure than the observer-based strategy with the integrator. Besides, compared to the band-increased strategy, the NIDOB strategy reduces much recovery time without introducing more noises (the recovery time is reduced from 0.35 s to 0.025 s). The theoretical analysis and experimental results can prove its advantages.

The NIDOB method is analyzed and proposed for constant voltage control of DC/DC converter, but it is also promising to employ it inverter’s control, because the AC component can be transformed into DC component through Park's Transformation.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China (BK20230168).

Author contributions

Wenqiang Xie and Xian Zheng wrote the main manuscript text and conducted the experiments. Mingming Shi and Jiaoxin Jia prepared all the figures. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. Saafan AA Khadkikar V Moursi MSE Zeineldin HH A new multiport DC-DC converter for DC microgrid applications IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2023 59 1 601 611 10.1109/TIA.2022.3213235
Saafan, A. A., Khadkikar, V., Moursi, M. S. E. & Zeineldin, H. H. A new multiport DC-DC converter for DC microgrid applications. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 59(1), 601–611 (2023).10.1109/TIA.2022.3213235
2. Xie W Han M Cao W Guerrero JM Vasquez JC Virtual resistance tradeoff design for DCMG grid-forming converters considering static- and large-signal dynamic constraints IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2021 36 5 5582 5593 10.1109/TPEL.2020.3029716
Xie, W., Han, M., Cao, W., Guerrero, J. M. & Vasquez, J. C. Virtual resistance tradeoff design for DCMG grid-forming converters considering static- and large-signal dynamic constraints. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 36(5), 5582–5593 (2021).10.1109/TPEL.2020.3029716
3. Pires VF Cordeiro A Roncero-Clemente C Rivera S Dragičević T DC–DC converters for bipolar microgrid voltage balancing: A comprehensive review of architectures and topologies IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron. 2023 11 1 981 998 10.1109/JESTPE.2022.3208689
Pires, V. F., Cordeiro, A., Roncero-Clemente, C., Rivera, S. & Dragičević, T. DC–DC converters for bipolar microgrid voltage balancing: A comprehensive review of architectures and topologies. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron. 11(1), 981–998 (2023).10.1109/JESTPE.2022.3208689
4. E. R. Diaz et al., Intelligent DC microgrid living laboratories—A Chinese–Danish cooperation project. in Proc. IEEE 1st Int. Conf. DC Microgrids (ICDCM), Atlanta, GA, USA, Jun. 2015, pp. 365–370.
5. M. Noritake, K. Yuasa, T. Takeda, H. Hoshi, & K. Hirose, Demonstrative research on DC microgrids for office buildings. in Proc. IEEE 36th Int. Telecommun. Energy Conf. (INTELEC), Vancouver, BC, Canada, Sep. 2014, pp. 1–5.
6. Patarroyo-Montenegro JF Andrade F Guerrero JM Vasquez JC A linear quadratic regulator with optimal reference tracking for three-phase inverter-based islanded microgrids IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2021 36 6 7112 7122 10.1109/TPEL.2020.3036594
Patarroyo-Montenegro, J. F., Andrade, F., Guerrero, J. M. & Vasquez, J. C. A linear quadratic regulator with optimal reference tracking for three-phase inverter-based islanded microgrids. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 36(6), 7112–7122 (2021).10.1109/TPEL.2020.3036594
7. Ganjian-Aboukheili M Shahabi M Shafiee Q Guerrero JM Seamless transition of microgrids operation from grid-connected to islanded mode IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2020 11 3 2106 2114 10.1109/TSG.2019.2947651
Ganjian-Aboukheili, M., Shahabi, M., Shafiee, Q. & Guerrero, J. M. Seamless transition of microgrids operation from grid-connected to islanded mode. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 11(3), 2106–2114 (2020).10.1109/TSG.2019.2947651
8. Vukojevic A Lukic S Microgrid protection and control schemes for seamless transition to island and grid synchronization IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2020 11 4 2845 2855 10.1109/TSG.2020.2975850
Vukojevic, A. & Lukic, S. Microgrid protection and control schemes for seamless transition to island and grid synchronization. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 11(4), 2845–2855 (2020).10.1109/TSG.2020.2975850
9. H. Wang, M. Han, W. Yan, G. zhao, J. M. Guerrero. A feed-forward control realizing fast response for three-branch interleaved DC-DC converter in DC microgrid. Energies, vol. 9, no. 7. Jul. 2016.
10. Wei C Chen C Wu K Ko I Design of an average-current-mode noninverting buck-boost dc-dc converter with reduced switching and conduction losses IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2012 27 12 4934 4943 10.1109/TPEL.2012.2193144
Wei, C., Chen, C., Wu, K. & Ko, I. Design of an average-current-mode noninverting buck-boost dc-dc converter with reduced switching and conduction losses. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 27(12), 4934–4943 (2012).10.1109/TPEL.2012.2193144
11. Park J Fan J Wang X Huang A A sample-data model for double edge current programmed mode control (DECPM) in high-frequency and wide-range dc-dc converters IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2010 25 4 1023 1033 10.1109/TPEL.2009.2036618
Park, J., Fan, J., Wang, X. & Huang, A. A sample-data model for double edge current programmed mode control (DECPM) in high-frequency and wide-range dc-dc converters. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 25(4), 1023–1033 (2010).10.1109/TPEL.2009.2036618
12. Yan Y Gu E A scalable multiphase current-mode buck controller with sub-milliohm DCR current sensing and synchronized overcurrent protection IEEE J. Solid-State Circ. 2021 56 9 2748 2759 10.1109/JSSC.2021.3071728
Yan, Y. & Gu, E. A scalable multiphase current-mode buck controller with sub-milliohm DCR current sensing and synchronized overcurrent protection. IEEE J. Solid-State Circ. 56(9), 2748–2759 (2021).10.1109/JSSC.2021.3071728
13. Mahdavi S Panamtash H Dimitrovski A Zhou Q Predictive coordinated and cooperative voltage control for systems with high penetration of PV IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2021 57 3 2212 2222 10.1109/TIA.2021.3064910
Mahdavi, S., Panamtash, H., Dimitrovski, A. & Zhou, Q. Predictive coordinated and cooperative voltage control for systems with high penetration of PV. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 57(3), 2212–2222 (2021).10.1109/TIA.2021.3064910
14. Lin X Wen H Yu J Yu R Adverse influence of PLL on the bus voltage feed-forward with band pass filter under harmonic and unbalance condition IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2021 36 2 1233 1236 10.1109/TPWRD.2020.3025465
Lin, X., Wen, H., Yu, J. & Yu, R. Adverse influence of PLL on the bus voltage feed-forward with band pass filter under harmonic and unbalance condition. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 36(2), 1233–1236 (2021).10.1109/TPWRD.2020.3025465
15. Chae J-H Jeong Y-U Choi B-D Design and comparative study of voltage regulation-based 2-tap flexible feed-forward equalizer for voltage-mode transmitters IEEE Access 2022 10 37446 37456 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3164742
Chae, J.-H., Jeong, Y.-U. & Choi, B.-D. Design and comparative study of voltage regulation-based 2-tap flexible feed-forward equalizer for voltage-mode transmitters. IEEE Access 10, 37446–37456 (2022).10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3164742
16. Dai L Li X Zhu Y Zhang M Quantitative tracking error analysis and feedforward compensation under different model-based feedforward controllers in different control architectures IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2021 68 1 381 390 10.1109/TIE.2019.2960717
Dai, L., Li, X., Zhu, Y. & Zhang, M. Quantitative tracking error analysis and feedforward compensation under different model-based feedforward controllers in different control architectures. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 68(1), 381–390 (2021).10.1109/TIE.2019.2960717
17. Yin K Gao L Chen R Feng Z Liu S Adaptive deadbeat predictive current control for PMSM with feed forward method IEEE Access 2021 9 101300 101310 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3097378
Yin, K., Gao, L., Chen, R., Feng, Z. & Liu, S. Adaptive deadbeat predictive current control for PMSM with feed forward method. IEEE Access 9, 101300–101310 (2021).10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3097378
18. Vazquez N Liserre M Peak current control and feed-forward compensation of a DAB converter IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2020 67 10 8381 8391 10.1109/TIE.2019.2949523
Vazquez, N. & Liserre, M. Peak current control and feed-forward compensation of a DAB converter. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 67(10), 8381–8391 (2020).10.1109/TIE.2019.2949523
19. Mao, S., Gao, C., & Lu, Y. High bandwidth DC-DC converter with active current ripples injection. In 2019 22nd International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS), Harbin, China, 2019, pp. 1–5.
20. Hsiao S-F Nien C-F Chen D Chen C-J Four-frequency small-signal model for high-bandwidth voltage regulator with current-mode control IEEE Access 2022 10 25633 25644 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3154010
Hsiao, S.-F., Nien, C.-F., Chen, D. & Chen, C.-J. Four-frequency small-signal model for high-bandwidth voltage regulator with current-mode control. IEEE Access 10, 25633–25644 (2022).10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3154010
21. Kumar H Channappanavar R Mishra SK High bandwidth inductor current estimator for digitally controlled DC–DC converters for light load applications IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron. 2021 9 6 6681 6691 10.1109/JESTPE.2021.3105598
Kumar, H., Channappanavar, R. & Mishra, S. K. High bandwidth inductor current estimator for digitally controlled DC–DC converters for light load applications. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron. 9(6), 6681–6691 (2021).10.1109/JESTPE.2021.3105598
22. Sariyildiz E Oboe R Ohnishi K Disturbance observer-based robust control and its applications: 35th Anniversary Overview IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2020 67 3 2042 2053 10.1109/TIE.2019.2903752
Sariyildiz, E., Oboe, R. & Ohnishi, K. Disturbance observer-based robust control and its applications: 35th Anniversary Overview. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 67(3), 2042–2053 (2020).10.1109/TIE.2019.2903752
23. Liu Q Liu M Jin Q Liu Y Design of DOB-based control system in the presence of uncertain delays for low-order processes IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 2020 28 2 558 565 10.1109/TCST.2018.2874016
Liu, Q., Liu, M., Jin, Q. & Liu, Y. Design of DOB-based control system in the presence of uncertain delays for low-order processes. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 28(2), 558–565 (2020).10.1109/TCST.2018.2874016
24. Lee D Seo H Jang I Lee SJ Kim HJ Aerial manipulator pushing a movable structure using a DOB-based robust controller IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 2021 6 2 723 730 10.1109/LRA.2020.3047779
Lee, D., Seo, H., Jang, I., Lee, S. J. & Kim, H. J. Aerial manipulator pushing a movable structure using a DOB-based robust controller. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 6(2), 723–730 (2021).10.1109/LRA.2020.3047779
