
==== Front
Skeletal Radiol
Skeletal Radiol
Skeletal Radiology
0364-2348
1432-2161
Springer Berlin Heidelberg Berlin/Heidelberg

38240759
4589
10.1007/s00256-024-04589-4
Review Article
Imaging of lower extremity infections: predisposing conditions, atypical infections, mimics, and differentiating features
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2858-0794
Matcuk George R. Jr George.Matcuk@cshs.org

1
Katal Sanaz 2
Gholamrezanezhad Ali 13
Spinnato Paolo 4
Waldman Leah E. 5
Fields Brandon K. K. 6
Patel Dakshesh B. 3
Skalski Matthew R. 7
1 https://ror.org/02pammg90 grid.50956.3f 0000 0001 2152 9905 Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
2 Melbourne, Australia
3 https://ror.org/03taz7m60 grid.42505.36 0000 0001 2156 6853 Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
4 https://ror.org/02ycyys66 grid.419038.7 0000 0001 2154 6641 Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
5 grid.26009.3d 0000 0004 1936 7961 Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27705 USA
6 grid.266102.1 0000 0001 2297 6811 Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
7 https://ror.org/02yta1w47 grid.419969.a 0000 0004 1937 0749 Department of Radiology, Palmer College of Chiropractic—West Campus, San Jose, CA 95134 USA
19 1 2024
19 1 2024
2024
53 10 20992120
24 7 2023
4 1 2024
10 1 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Imaging evaluation for lower extremity infections can be complicated, especially in the setting of underlying conditions and with atypical infections. Predisposing conditions are discussed, including diabetes mellitus, peripheral arterial disease, neuropathic arthropathy, and intravenous drug abuse, as well as differentiating features of infectious versus non-infectious disease. Atypical infections such as viral, mycobacterial, fungal, and parasitic infections and their imaging features are also reviewed. Potential mimics of lower extremity infection including chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis, foreign body granuloma, gout, inflammatory arthropathies, lymphedema, and Morel-Lavallée lesions, and their differentiating features are also explored.

Keywords

Diabetes mellitus
Peripheral arterial disease
Neuropathic arthropathy
Atypical infection
Mimics
Imaging
Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterOpen access funding provided by SCELC, Statewide California Electronic Library Consortium

issue-copyright-statement© International Skeletal Society (ISS) 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Imaging plays an important role in the diagnosis of lower extremity infections. However, this can be complicated in the setting of underlying conditions or with atypical infections. This review presents the imaging features of underlying predisposing conditions, such as diabetes mellitus, peripheral arterial disease, and neuropathic arthropathy. The imaging manifestations of atypical infections, including viral, mycobacterial, fungal, and parasitic infections, are also examined. Potential mimics of lower extremity infection such as chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis, foreign body granuloma, gout, inflammatory arthropathies, lymphedema, and Morel-Lavallée lesions will be discussed, and their differentiating features highlighted.

Predisposing conditions

There are a number of underlying conditions that may predispose to and have overlapping features with lower extremity infection, including diabetes mellitus, peripheral arterial disease, and neuropathic arthropathy [1]. Peripheral arterial disease and neuropathic arthropathy often occur secondary to diabetes mellitus but can also be due to other etiologies.

Diabetes mellitus

Thirty seven million three hundred thousand people in the USA have diabetes, and another 96.1 million are considered prediabetic [2]. Diabetes mellitus predisposes to lower extremity infections through several pathological factors, including immunological dysfunction, vascular insufficiency, and neuropathy [3]. Hyperglycemia causes defective neutrophil function with disruption of migration patterns and reduced production of chemotactic factors, which impairs the immunological response to infection [4]. Hyperglycemia also increases osmotic stress in vessels and reduces nitric oxide levels, stimulating vasoconstriction. Arteriosclerosis, alteration of vascular cell apoptosis and proliferation, impaired hemostasis, increased vascular permeability, and excessive leukocyte adhesion also contribute to diabetic vascular insufficiency [5]. Diabetic neuropathy affects motor, sensory, and autonomic nerves, with motor and sensory damage leading to muscle atrophy and foot deformity (Charcot arthropathy) resulting in biomechanical changes that predispose to inadvertent foot trauma. Autonomic neuropathy causes vasodilation with erythema and impaired control of sweat glands, leading to anhidrosis with dry skin which is prone to fissuring and callus formation [4]. This combination of factors predisposes to ulceration, impaired healing, and lower extremity infection in diabetic patients. The most common infecting microorganism is Staphylococcus aureus, with methicillin-resistant (MRSA) strains comprising up to 17–30% of diabetic foot infections [6].

Diabetic myopathy is a complex interplay of changes in muscle metabolism due to chronic hyperglycemia and secondary changes due to motor neuropathy and vascular insufficiency [7, 8]. This can lead to generalized edema (T2 hyperintensity) with eventual fatty atrophy of the intrinsic foot and even the calf musculature on MRI [9]. It is important to differentiate from diabetic muscle infarct or myonecrosis, which will also demonstrate intramuscular iso-or decreased T1 and increased T2 signal intensity, but will also have muscle enlargement, with areas of near fluid signal intensity necrosis demonstrating rim enhancement on post-contrast images [10]. On ultrasound, diabetic muscle infarctions appear as well-marginated, hypoechoic intramuscular lesions with internal linear striations, lack a predominantly anechoic region, and do not show swirling fluid with transductor pressure [11]. CT reveals a low-attenuation intramuscular lesion with ring enhancement. There may be adjacent perifascial fluid and overlying subcutaneous edema.

Diabetic muscle infarct or myonecrosis is a rare complication of long-standing insulin-dependent diabetes and is usually a self-limiting disease that typically responds well to conservative management. It most often involves the thigh (usually quadriceps) muscles but may also involve the calf or rarely the upper extremity muscles (Fig. 1). Myonecrosis can also be seen in cancer patients secondary to radiotherapy or other treatment [12]. Involvement of the foot muscles has not been reported, in comparison to diabetic myopathy, where foot involvement is often most severe.Fig. 1 Fifty-five-year-old woman with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus with right thigh pain. Axial T1 (a), STIR (b), and coronal STIR (c) MR images demonstrate diffuse swelling and edema of the right vastus lateralis muscle (arrows) with a small focus of myonecrosis (arrowhead, b). The patient had no fever or leukocytosis and responded well to conservative management, differentiating this patient’s diagnosis of diabetic muscle infarct from pyomyositis, which can otherwise look similar on imaging

Diabetic muscle infarct and myonecrosis may be difficult to differentiate from pyomyositis, intramuscular abscess, and necrotizing fasciitis on imaging, although with pyomyositis, the muscle inflammation tends to be more diffuse and intense; with intramuscular abscess, the rim enhancement is more thick and irregular, and with necrotizing fasciitis, the deep perifascial fluid and enhancement are more extensive and may potentially show soft tissue gas [13]. Clinical information is also important for differentiating infection from diabetic myopathy or muscle infarct, including the presence of systemic symptoms such as fever and leukocytosis.

Peripheral arterial disease

Peripheral arterial disease and pedal ischemia can result from a combination of macrovascular and microvascular disease [14]. Macrovascular disease can be evaluated with conventional, CT, or MR angiography. Early soft tissue ischemia may have a normal appearance on T1 and T2 MR images or show subtle edema or slight decreased enhancement relative to adjacent non-ischemic areas. As ischemia progresses to devitalization (non-infected or dry gangrene), there is regional soft tissue loss (more pronounced on STIR compared to T1 sequences, Fig. 2) and absence of post-contrast enhancement. There may be superimposed foci of signal void within devitalized areas corresponding to gas, which is usually due to overlying skin ulceration/fissuring and does not generally imply infection with a gas-forming organism (gas gangrene). Bone infarction may also be present in ischemic areas and is characterized by a serpentine pattern with well-defined margin and adjacent bone marrow edema.Fig. 2 Eighty-five-year-old man with peripheral arterial disease with worsening pain and discoloration of his left toes. Clinical photograph (a) demonstrates areas of gangrene of his first, second, and third toes. Long-axis STIR (b), sagittal T1 (c), and STIR (d) MR images demonstrate signal loss of the soft tissues in the areas of gangrene (arrowheads) with patchy STIR hyperintensity (arrows) but normal T1 signal intensity within portions of the first proximal and distal and second distal phalanges, compatible with vascular insufficiency without superimposed infection (dry gangrene)

Superimposed infection of devitalized tissues (wet gangrene) will show the typical replacement of subcutaneous (cellulitis) or bone marrow (osteomyelitis) fat signal intensity with T1 hypointensity and T2 hyperintensity on pre-contrast images, but it is important to note that post-contrast enhancement will still be absent in these devitalized areas, even if infected. Similarly, soft tissue abscesses in devitalized tissue will appear as a focal fluid signal intensity collection but will not demonstrate rim enhancement.

Neuropathic arthropathy

Neuropathic osteoarthropathy (Charcot foot) was first described in patients with tabes dorsalis (syphilis) by Jean-Martin Charcot in 1868, but is most commonly secondary to diabetes [15, 16]. Other causes include spinal cord lesions (including syringomyelia, tumors, meningomyelocele, extrinsic compression, multiple sclerosis, and poliomyelitis), alcoholism, uremia, amyloidosis, pernicious anemia, congenital insensitivity to pain, familial dysautonomia (Riley-Day syndrome), hereditary sensory and motor neuropathy (Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease), and leprosy [16]. There are two main theories of etiology: the neurotraumatic theory, where absence of normal protective sensory feedback leads to repetitive unperceived trauma; and the neurovascular theory, where autonomic dysfunction causes vasodilation and hyperemia with resultant osteopenia, bone resorption, and fracture [17].

In the lower extremity, neuropathic arthropathy typically presents with a hypertrophic pattern which in the chronic stage is characterized by the “6 D’s” on plain radiographs: joint Distension (effusions), Destruction, Dislocation, Disorganization, Debris, and increased bone Density (relative sclerosis) [18]. The atrophic form with dominance of bone resorption that may mimic septic arthritis is more common in the non-weight-bearing joints of the upper extremity [17]. The destructive changes of the hypertrophic form can be difficult to distinguish from superimposed septic arthritis and osteomyelitis on imaging, particularly on plain radiographs and CT, and even clinically.

When superimposed infection is suspected, MRI is the preferred modality for evaluation. MRI features that are helpful for diagnosing superimposed infection and osteomyelitis include overly soft tissue changes such as ulcer, abscess, tenosynovitis, or sinus tract; typical location of involvement such as toes and weight-bearing regions such as metatarsal heads and calcaneus; and pattern and distribution of MRI signal change [19]. With neuropathic arthropathy, the bone marrow edema pattern tends to be periarticular, subchondral (although advanced cases may demonstrate diffuse T1 hypointensity and T2 hyperintensity, mimicking osteomyelitis), and involving several bones/joints, whereas superimposed osteomyelitis tends to be more focal, sometimes affecting only a single bone, with diffuse bone marrow involvement (Fig. 3).Fig. 3 Fifty-six-year-old diabetic man with left foot ulcer and soft tissue swelling. Lateral radiograph (a) demonstrates disorganization, relative increased density, dislocations, and rocker-bottom deformity of the midfoot, compatible with neuropathic arthropathy (Charcot foot) with a plantar soft tissue ulcer (arrowhead). Sagittal T1 (b) and STIR (c) MR images at the level of the cuboid and sagittal T1 (d) and STIR (e) MR images at the level of the fourth and fifth metatarsal bases demonstrate bone marrow replacement with increased STIR and decreased T1 signal intensity in the cuboid and proximal fourth and fifth metatarsal bases (arrows) compatible with superimposed osteomyelitis subjacent to the ulcer

Post-contrast imaging may be helpful for demonstrating superimposed osteomyelitis, particularly when there is low T1 signal on pre-contrast images with poor definition of the bones (“disappeared”) that then “reappear” after contrast administration, also known as the “ghost sign” [20]. Advanced techniques such as diffusion-weighted imaging (osteomyelitis demonstrates restricted diffusion while bone marrow edema does not) and dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) (which may show different perfusion patterns between osteomyelitis and osteoarthropathy) may increase specificity [21, 22].

However, there remains some overlap in the MRI appearance of neuropathic arthropathy with and without infection. In non-conclusive cases, nuclear medicine imaging including white blood cell scintigraphy and 18F-FDG PET (or PET-CT) may be helpful, with a higher specificity for superimposed osteomyelitis [23]. For scintigraphy, it may be useful to combine leukocyte scintigraphy with bone scintigraphy and sulfur colloid bone marrow imaging (a triple tracer study), which improves diagnostic accuracy for osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot, with a sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 100% [24].

Intravenous drug abuse (IVDA)

It is estimated that approximately 16 million people worldwide inject illicit drugs on a regular basis, including over 600,000 Americans, with heroin the most commonly injected drug [25]. Approximately one-fifth of intravenous drug abusers inject the foot, making it the fourth most common site of injection in the body [26]. Injection of the lower extremities can result in chronic venous insufficiency (13%), leg ulcers (10%), and deep venous thrombosis (23%) [27]. Long-term IVDA can result in sclerosis of veins and lead some user to inject subdermally, a practice also known as “skin popping” [25]. Approximately one-fourth of patients with IVDA develop cellulitis or abscess, with the incidence rising to 61% in skin poppers. These soft tissue infections can lead to ulcerations, which some abusers maintain as a “shooter’s patch,” using the granulation tissue as another means for injecting illicit drugs. Most infections are caused by S. aureus; some infections can progress osteomyelitis. Most infections require some form of surgical debridement; however, it can be challenging to ensure that these patients get the appropriate care, with 12% of patient leaving against medical advice and nearly three-fourths not returning for scheduled outpatient visits [28].

Atypical infections

Most lower extremity infections are bacterial in origin, most commonly Staphylococcus and Streptococcus species, and may be polymicrobial, with aerobic and anaerobic bacteria present at the same time [29]. However, atypical bacterial, fungal, viral, and parasitic infections can also be causes of lower extremity infections in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients, with a wide range of imaging appearances [30].

Viral infection

Many viral infections can cause skin rashes, myalgia or myositis, and arthralgias. Despite clinical presentations which include joint effusion, swelling, and synovitis [30], imaging findings may be subtle or inapparent. Viral osteomyelitis mostly occurs in neonates and children, with radiolucent metaphyseal lesions and periarticular osteopenia adjacent to the growth plate. Congenital rubella classically produces longitudinal striated sclerotic bands at the metaphysis giving a celery stalk appearance.

Chikungunya virus is a mosquito-borne arbovirus in tropical regions that can present with fever, rash, and debilitating polyarthralgia that can last for months following infection [31]. Joint involvement most often affects the hands, wrists, ankles, and metatarsophalangeal joints [32]. On radiography, joint space narrowing (57%) and erosions (24%) can be seen 10–18 months post infection, with up to 81% demonstrating these findings at 24 months. MRI is more sensitive for erosions, which can be seen as early as 6 months after infection with this modality [33]. MRI findings can mimic rheumatoid arthritis with periosteal inflammation, bone marrow edema, joint effusions, synovitis, and tendinitis/tenosynovitis [34].

COVID-19 infection can likewise present with musculoskeletal manifestations, including myalgia, myositis and rhabdomyolysis (with muscle edema or myonecrosis on MRI), peripheral neuropathy (with nerve enlargement and loss of fascicular architecture on US or MRI, and T2 hyperintensity on MRI with or without muscle denervation edema), arthralgias (with joint effusion and synovitis on US and MRI), osteopenia and osteonecrosis (probably secondary to corticosteroid therapy and/or hypercoagulability), intramuscular hematomas (due to frequent anticoagulation use to prevent or treat COVID-19-related thromboembolic disease), atypical decubitus ulcers (related to prolonged hospital stays and prone positioning), and gangrene (“COVID toes”) [35, 36]. Proposed mechanisms of these COVID-19 musculoskeletal manifestations include systemic inflammatory dysregulation (cytokine storm), prothrombic state (hypercoagulability), and autoimmunity [37]. Up to 10–20% of patients will develop long- or Post-COVID-19 condition with symptoms of fatigue, shortness of breath, arthralgias, muscle pain or spasms, and post-exertional malaise due to long-standing COVID-19-related myopathy. Decreased muscle bulk (sarcopenia) and fatty infiltration (myosteatosis) may be due to a combination of denervation atrophy, deconditioning due to prolonged immobilization, immune-mediated myopathy, toxic or drug-related myopathy, and nutritional deficiencies.

Mycobacterial infection

Extrapulmonary tuberculosis (TB) accounts for 15–20% of all Mycobacterium tuberculosis infections. As many as 1–3% of all TB cases involve the musculoskeletal system, usually due to lymph-hematogenous spread of primary pulmonary infection [38]. Musculoskeletal TB most commonly presents as tuberculous spondylitis (Pott’s disease), but peripheral arthritis, osteomyelitis, tenosynovitis, and bursitis can also occur, in decreasing order of frequency [39].

Tuberculous arthritis mainly involves weight-bearing joints such as the sacroiliac, hip, and knee joints, and is usually monoarticular (90%) [40]. The classic radiographic findings include juxta-articular osteopenia, peripheral/marginal osseous erosions, and gradual progressive joint space narrowing, known as Phemister’s triad (Fig. 4) [41]. There is gradual joint space narrowing as the synovitis with early-stage TB leaves the articular cartilage intact, although secondary degenerative change and eventually ankylosis can be seen in later stages [40]. There can also be peri-articular abscesses and soft tissue calcifications.Fig. 4 Thirty-eight-year-old man with right knee pain and swelling. Lateral radiograph (a) and Cor T1 (b), Sag STIR (c), and axial STIR (d) MR images of the right knee demonstrate juxta-articular osteopenia with a peripheral erosion (arrow) and relative preservation of the joint space with only gradual narrowing over a period of five months (Phemister’s triad) and a large joint effusion (arrowhead) with extensive synovitis on MRI. Joint aspiration demonstrated acid-fast bacilli, and cultures grew Mycobacterium tuberculosis, diagnostic for tuberculous arthritis

Extraspinal tuberculous osteomyelitis typically affects the lower extremity bones (Fig. 5) [42]. Radiographs demonstrate osteopenia with metaphyseal lytic lesions which likewise show low T1 and high T2 signal intensity on MRI, with peripheral enhancement in cases of intraosseous abscesses [43, 44]. In children, a differentiating feature of tuberculous compared with pyogenic infection is spread across the physis, which may lead to balloon-like swelling and cyst-like cavity appearance of the tubular bones of the hands and feet with dactylitis, also known as spina ventosa [45]. Muscle, subcutaneous, and skin involvement in TB is rare, with psoas abscesses the most common manifestation secondary to spondylodiscitis, though notably with absence of significant surrounding edema, myositis, or cellulitis (“cold abscess”) [39, 43].Fig. 5 Tuberculous osteomyelitis of the tibia. Lateral radiograph (a) demonstrates expansile lytic lesion of the anterior cortex of the mid tibial diaphysis with corresponding fluid signal intensity and adjacent bone marrow edema on sagittal STIR MRI (b). Axial T1 MRI (c) shows intraosseous abscess (*), sequestrum (curved arrow), cloaca (double headed arrow), and involucrum (arrowheads) with the abscess extending into the soft tissues through the cloaca

Atypical mycobacteria account for 0.5–30% of all mycobacterial infections, most commonly in elderly or immunocompromised patients, with 5–10% involving the musculoskeletal system [46]. Infection may be from direct inoculation from environmental or contiguous sources or from hematogenous spread. Musculoskeletal manifestations can be similar to TB infection, with aspiration or biopsy required for differentiation. Osseous infection is most common with Mycobacterium kansasii and Mycobacterium scrofulaceum, followed in frequency by Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare (MAC) and M. fortuitum, though it may take several weeks for osteolysis and periostitis to become radiographically evident [46, 47]. In cases of lower extremity atypical mycobacterial infection as a result of direct inoculation from minor penetrating injuries, soft tissue manifestations such as cellulitis, abscess, septic bursitis, and septic tenosynovitis are more common than with TB [46].

Leprosy (Hansen disease) is an infection by Mycobacterium leprae, which has a special predilection for the skin and nerves [48]. Untreated leprosy can lead initially to sensory loss, which increases the frequency of minor injuries and ultimately leads to infection and, eventually, mutilating injuries. On imaging, nerves affected by leprosy can appear enlarged, with loss of the normal fascicular pattern, increased flow on Doppler ultrasound, and T2 hyperintensity, and show gadolinium enhancement on MRI. US and MRI have reported sensitivities of 74% and 92%, respectively, with active disease [49]. Due to this enlargement, nerve compression in fibro-osseous tunnels can be seen in up to a third of cases. Up to 60% may have joint symptoms, including pain and swelling, in a pattern that may mimic rheumatoid arthritis [50]. Chronic infection may lead to neuropathic arthropathy in the feet, with four main types affecting the (1) ankle; (2) midtarsal (Chopart); (3) tarsometatarsal (Lisfranc), or (4) subtalar joints [51]. In advanced cases, tapering of the metatarsals or phalanges can lead to an arthritis mutilans with “licked candy stick” appearance (Fig. 6), as can also be seen with psoriatic arthritis [52].Fig. 6 Eighty-five-year-old woman with leprosy (Hansen’s disease) and right foot deformity. AP (a) and oblique (b) radiographs demonstrate arthritis mutilans with osseous destructive changes of the distal metatarsals and phalanges with a “licked candy stick” appearance of the distal second and third metatarsals (arrowheads), due to leprosy induced neuropathic arthropathy

Madura foot

Madura foot or pedal mycetoma is a rare tropical foot infection caused by filamentous bacteria (e.g., Actinomyces or Nocardia species) or true fungi (Madurella species). It occurs due to direct inoculation from organisms in the soil and classically presents with hard woody swellings, discharging sinuses, and presence of organism-containing grains (mycetomas) that can progress to muscle and bone involvement with permanent disability [53]. On radiographs, foot involvement can progress through a series of findings: stage 0 = soft-tissue swelling at site of entry without bone involvement; stage I = expanding granuloma with displacement or scalloping of bone; stage II = bone irritation with periosteal reaction or reactive sclerosis; stage III = erosion or cavitation of a single bone; stage IV = longitudinal spread with joint involvement along a single ray; stage V = horizontal spread with invasion of adjacent structure of the hindfoot, midfoot, or forefoot; and stage VI = multidirectional spread with total disruption of multiple rays and rows [54]. On MRI, the characteristic finding is a pedal mycetoma, which is a microabscess containing aggregates of the organism, also known as grains or sulfur granules, leading to the “dot-in-circle” sign of multiple small (2–5 mm), round hyperintense lesions with a hypointense fibrous rim and a central low-signal intensity focus (Fig. 7) [55, 56].Fig. 7 Sixty-year-old woman with chronic right foot pain and infection. AP radiograph (a) and long axis T1 (b) and STIR (c) MRI images of the right foot demonstrate extensive rounded cystic lucencies corresponding to T1 and T2 hyperintense mycetomas with a central T2 hypointense focus (arrowheads highlight representative lesion of the second metatarsal), compatible with the “dot-in-circle” sign in this patient with fungal osteomyelitis (Madura foot)

Fungal infection

Invasive fungal infections are rising due to increased number of immunocompromised patients, including those with neutropenia, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), chronic immunosuppression, indwelling prostheses, burns, diabetes mellitus, and those on broad-spectrum antibiotics [57]. Fungal infections typically occur in endemic regions and may spread by direct skin inoculation or hematogenously, usually via the lungs [58]. Fungal infections may present with soft tissue nodules (granulomas), sinus tracts to the skin, multifocal chronic osteomyelitis, and chronic granulomatous joint involvement, with imaging findings overlapping with mycobacterial infection.

The musculoskeletal system is the fourth most common system involved with Aspergillus (Aspergillus fumigatus) infection due to hematogenous spread from invasive pulmonary infection, which can cause osteomyelitis with multifocal lytic lesions, often of the pelvis and knee. Blastomycosis (Blastomyces dermatitidis) is usually due to skin inoculate of the soles of the feet leading to subcutaneous granulomas and skin sinuses and may cause lower limb osteomyelitis and joint involvement in up to 30% of cases. Infection with Candida species in immunosuppressed patients can lead to blood-borne spread and cause osteomyelitis with osteolytic lesions of larger joints including the hip and knee, though notably without concomitant periostitis or septic arthritis.

Coccidiomycosis (Coccidioides immitis) is endemic to the southwestern USA and parts of Mexico and Central and South America, particularly the San Joaquin Valley of California (Valley fever) [59]. Musculoskeletal manifestations of coccidioidomycosis are present in 20–50% of cases with systemic spread from the lungs (1–5% incidence), most commonly resulting in axial skeletal followed by joint involvement with chronic granulomatous synovitis and periarticular bone destruction. Osteomyelitis can also affect the lower extremities and usually presents with destructive lytic bone lesions that may be well circumscribed (punched out) in more than 50% of cases, but permeative or moth-eaten borders with loss of subchondral bone and damage to articular cartilage may also be seen (Fig. 8) [60, 61]. Although a predilection for bony prominences has been postulated, this has not been supported by subsequent literature.Fig. 8 Nineteen-year-old man with disseminated coccidioidomycosis and right knee pain. Lateral radiograph (a) and axial PD FS MR image (b) of the right knee demonstrate a lytic T2 hyperintense lesion of the patella (arrows) with anterior cortical breakthrough and a soft tissue component with prepatellar soft tissue swelling (arrowheads). This patient had a confirmed histologic diagnosis of Coccidioides immitis osteomyelitis

Cryptococcosis (Cryptococcus neoformans) is usually an opportunistic infection in AIDS patients with CD4 T cell lymphocyte counts less than 50 cells/mm3. Hematogenous spread from pulmonary infections can lead to discitis/osteomyelitis, multifocal osteolytic lesions, abscesses, and large joint septic arthritis, including the hips, knees, and ankles (Fig. 9) [58]. Sporotrichosis (Sporothrix schenckii) is the most common fungal infection of the deep soft tissues of the extremities and is usually transmitted via contaminated wood (thorns) in the hands and feet of agricultural workers and gardeners. Bone involvement can be proliferative and sclerotic. Histoplasmosis (Histoplasma species) is endemic to the Ohio and Mississippi river valleys and most often causes pulmonary granuloma formation that resembles tuberculosis, though hematogenous spread can lead to osteomyelitis, with a focal osteolytic lesion of long bones that can be confused with bone tumors [62].Fig. 9 Sixty-three-year-old man with HIV and disseminated cryptococcus. Axial STIR MR image demonstrates multifocal soft tissues abscesses of the bilateral lower legs (arrows)

Parasitic infection

Although parasitic infection is common worldwide, often as a consequence of poor sanitation (untreated drinking water), musculoskeletal involvement is uncommon compared to visceral involvement [30]. Cutaneous manifestations such as subcutaneous cystic nodules (cysticercosis), skin ulcers (dracunculosis), localized subcutaneous (Calabar) swellings (loiasis), fibrous nodules (onchocerciasis), pruritic papular dermatitis (schistosomiasis), eyelid edema, and subungual hemorrhage (trichinosis) are generally diagnosed clinically, with imaging typically not indicated. Among parasitic infections, helminthic infections most often cause musculoskeletal manifestations, and can be divided into nematodes (worms), trematodes (flukes), and cestodes (tapeworms).

Nematodes may be divided into intestinal and tissue worms, where the former does not but the latter can involve the musculoskeletal system. Trichinosis (Trichinella spiralis) is usually caused by ingestion of raw or inadequately cooked pork containing encysted larvae, which disseminate through the body. Those that reach skeletal muscle and survive can cause myositis. Filariasis is caused by infection with Wuchereria bancrofti or less commonly Brugia malayi spread by mosquitoes. Once inoculated, larval worms mature and grow into adult worms that colonize the lymphatics and can lead to marked swelling of the lower extremities, causing lymphangitis and ultimately elephantiasis. This manifests as blurring of the subcutaneous fat planes with a linear striated pattern and soft tissue calcification on plain radiographs [30, 63]. Other filarial infections such as onchocerciasis, loiasis, and dracunculosis are caused by larger worms that do not obstruct lymphatics and more commonly calcify, with alive subcutaneous worms occasionally detected by ultrasound. Migration of worms near a joint may cause a chemical synovitis.

Cestodes (tapeworms) infection is most commonly due to fecal–oral transmission by cats or dogs or through improperly cooked meat. Cysticercosis (Taenia solium) can penetrate the intestinal wall and travel to the muscles to form palpable cysts and elongated “rice grain” calcifications (Fig. 10) [30, 63]. Hydatid disease is most commonly caused by the larval stage of Echinococcosis granulosus [64]. Although it may occur almost anywhere in the body, its most frequent targets include the liver (65–70%) and lungs (25–30%). Muscle (0.5–4%) and bone (0.5–2.5%) involvement is rare. Muscular involvement most commonly affects the paravertebral, gluteal, and lower extremity muscles. On cross-sectional imaging, typical features include multivesicular cysts with intracystic membranes (daughter vesicles or cysts). Curvilinear or ringlike calcifications are seen in 20–30% of cases [65]. There are five types of appearances by the Gharbi classification: type I: simple cyst with laminar membrane visible (snowflake sign; fertile cyst); type II: detached membrane (serpent sign; fertile cyst); type III: cyst with multiple daughter cysts (spoke wheel or honeycomb pattern; usually fertile cyst); type IV: heterogenous lesion solid and cystic (rarely fertile); and type V: calcified cyst (inactive) (Fig. 11) [66]. The World Health Organization (WHO) classification also adds a type CL for a non-specific cystic appearance without visible membranes that can occur in up to 25% of cases of hydatid cysts. Collapse can result in the “water-lily sign” with a floating membrane appearance. Free-floating brood capsules with white sediment (“hydatid sand sign”) and “fluid–fluid levels” may also be seen [63]. Hydatid disease of the bone most commonly occurs in well-vascularized areas such as vertebrae and the long bones, with 50% occurring within the spine, followed by the pelvis, femur, and tibia. On radiographs, there is osteolytic change that can progress to fill and eventually expand the medullary cavity and may mimic an aneurysmal bone cyst, giant cell tumor, myeloma, or cystic metastasis (Fig. 12). Findings may progress to erosion through the cortex with involvement of the adjacent soft tissues, eventually leading to pathological fracture. Periosteal reaction or sclerosis are uncommon. Extraosseous hydatid cysts may calcify, but intraosseous cysts rarely do. Biopsy and aspiration are generally contraindicated due to risk of spillage, which may trigger anaphylaxis.Fig. 10 Sixty-year-old woman with left knee pain. AP (a) and lateral (b) radiographs demonstrate numerous intramuscular “rice grain” calcifications, compatible with cysticercosis from prior ingestion of Taenia solium eggs via fecal–oral transmission

Fig. 11 Illustration demonstrating the Gharbi classification of echinococcal cyst types and appearances

Fig. 12 Sixty-year-old male farmer and shepherd from Southern Italy with left femur echinococcosis with pathological fracture. Axial (a, b) and sagittal (c) CT images demonstrate a 15-cm lytic lesion of the proximal femur with pathological fracture (arrows) and multilocular daughter cysts (arrowheads) extending into the vastus intermedius muscle. AP radiograph (d) 20 years later shows that the patient has done well after proximal femur resection and left total hip modular endoprosthesis placement

Most trematodes (flukes) preferentially involve the abdominal organs. Freshwater snails are intermediate hosts. Bathing or wading in infested waters allows the parasite to burrow under the skin, where it then migrates to and matures within the liver and can migrate and can subsequently lodge in the venules of the bowel and genitourinary system. Rarely, schistosomiasis (bilharziasis) has been reported to cause polyarthropathy due to joint involvement.

Protozoan infections rarely cause musculoskeletal manifestations. Toxoplasmosis (Toxoplasma gondii) can occasionally cause osseous lesions, with metaphyseal alteration of tubular bones that can simulate rubella [63]. Giardiasis (Giardia lamblia), also a gastrointestinal protozoan, has been reported to cause reactive arthritis, including sacroiliitis and synovitis. Protozoan infections such as malaria and kala azar (Leishmania donovani) infection can cause myalgia; however, imaging is generally not useful [30].

Selected potential mimics

There are several potential mimics of lower extremity infections that should be considered when evaluating patients with suspected infections, including chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis (CNO), foreign body granuloma, and inflammatory arthropathies such as gout, lymphedema, and Morel Lavallée lesions (MLLs). These conditions are characterized by swelling and erythema, along with fever and elevated inflammatory markers (WBC and CRP). In order to prevent misdiagnosis, it is essential to assess imaging findings alongside clinical information, demographics, and laboratory test results (Fig. 13).Fig. 13 Osteosarcoma mimicking osteomyelitis. Fifty-eight-year-old male with right great toe pain. AP radiograph of the right foot (a) demonstrates an aggressive lytic lesion of the first distal phalanx (arrow). MR examination of the foot reveals a marrow-replacing lesion in the first distal phalanx (arrows), demonstrating T1 hypointensity (b) and T2 hyperintensity (c), raising suspicion for osteomyelitis. However, subsequent tissue sampling confirmed the lesion as osteosarcoma. Restaging whole body 18F-FDG PET-CT (d) after surgical resection and multiple cycles of chemotherapy shows hypermetabolic activity of the right ankle (arrowhead) and inguinal lymph nodes (curved arrow), with respective SUVmax values of 4.4 and 10.4, indicative of metastatic lymphadenopathy

CNO/CMRO

Chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis (CNO) is a relatively rare autoinflammatory disease occurring primarily in children and adolescents. It is a non-infectious disorder causing recurrent musculoskeletal pain. Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO) is a particularly severe manifestation of CNO, typically distinguished by symmetric inflammatory bone lesions and a waxing and waning disease course [67]. The characteristic CNO/CMRO lesions are multiple and symmetric, usually affecting metaphyses of long bones of the lower extremities near the knees and ankles. There is currently no definitive diagnostic test to confirm the presence of CNO. Typically, CNO is a diagnosis of exclusion by ruling out other diseases such as acute bacterial osteomyelitis, bone tumors, and blood disorders. Distinguishing between CNO and extremity infection can be challenging as they can present with similar symptoms such as localized pain, swelling, and erythema. Imaging plays a crucial role in the diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and monitoring of CNO patients.

Radiography

Plain radiographs are commonly utilized as the first step in screening and to exclude fractures in CNO patients. Radiographically, findings may manifest as lytic, sclerotic, or mixed bone lesions, with hyperostosis and periosteal reaction. However, the lack of these findings does not necessarily rule out CNO [68].

Nuclear medicine

Whole body bone scintigraphy is a useful imaging technique for the diagnosis and monitoring of CNO. It can detect clinically silent lesions and monitor disease progression. However, novel more sensitive imaging modalities, such as WB-MR, have largely replaced bone scintigraphy due to their greater accuracy and the absence of radiation exposure. As such, bone scintigraphy should only be considered when WB-MRI or serial MRIs are not available.

CT

While CT is not typically recommended for children with suspected CNO given the associated radiation exposure and advantages of MRI, there may be certain cases where it could be useful. For example, in scenarios where MRI is unavailable or when there is persistent doubt even after MRI, CT can serve as a valuable diagnostic aid [69].

MRI

Currently, WB-MRI is the most sensitive and preferred imaging modality for the diagnosis and monitoring of CNO. WB-MRI is recommended for screening silent lesions as it can identify asymptomatic and radiographically hidden multifocal lesions, all while sparing children from radiation. Additionally, it provides information on lesion distribution and soft tissue involvement, making it a useful tool for excluding differential diagnoses including infection [70].

Overall, a combination of imaging findings (mainly using WB-MRI), clinical presentation, and laboratory parameters are required to differentiate CNO from extremity infection (Fig. 14).Fig. 14 Chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis (CNO) mimicking bacterial osteomyelitis. Fourteen-year-old male with right hip and ankle pain. AP radiograph of the right ankle (a) reveals permeative lucency (arrow) of the lateral malleolus with periosteal reaction (arrowhead) along the distal metadiaphysis. Coronal STIR MRI image (b) exhibits edema (arrow) and periostitis (arrowhead). Tc99m-MDP bone scan (c) demonstrated increased uptake in the right lateral malleolus and also the right greater trochanter (curved arrows). AP radiograph of the right hip (d) also shows permeative lucency of the greater trochanter (arrow) with corresponding bone marrow (arrow) and adjacent soft tissue edema on coronal STIR MRI (e). The diagnosis of chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis was confirmed by bone biopsy of the greater trochanter (f) with histopathological analysis revealing nonspecific inflammatory changes and negative culture results

Foreign body granuloma

Foreign body granuloma can arise either from an iatrogenic gossypiboma, caused by the retention of surgical sponges or instruments during an operation, or from a penetrating foreign body that results in the formation of granulation tissue around it. On occasion, foreign body granulomas and infections in the lower extremities can present with similar clinical symptoms. More importantly, infection, including cellulitis and soft tissue abscesses, is the most frequent complication associated with retained foreign bodies. Therefore, it is imperative for radiologists to be familiar with both conditions for early diagnosis and effective management.

Radiography

Conventional radiography serves as an initial screening tool for suspected foreign body cases, with a detection rate of 80% for all foreign bodies [71]. If the foreign body is radiopaque, it is often easily identifiable. However, it may be challenging to identify radiolucent foreign bodies like wooden splinters using plain radiography [72].

Ultrasound

Ultrasound may also be useful for identifying foreign bodies in cases of clinical concern. Sonography is both sensitive and specific in detecting and localizing foreign bodies. While many foreign bodies are radiolucent and may remain undetectable on plain radiography, all of them are hyperechoic on sonography and will demonstrate posterior acoustic shadowing [73]. They are typically surrounded by hypoechoic halos consisting of reactive lesions such as hematoma, edema, and granulation tissue (Fig. 15) [74]. Additionally, ultrasound can identify foreign body complications including infection [75]. Furthermore, it can offer immediate imaging guidance for the extraction. Thus, when evaluating suspected radiolucent foreign bodies, ultrasound is considered the most effective imaging technique.Fig. 15 Fourteen-year-old boy with left thigh subcutaneous foreign body granuloma after accident. Grayscale ultrasound (a) demonstrates an 8-mm linear hyperechoic foreign body with surrounding hypoechoic foreign body granuloma and surrounding hyperemia on color Doppler image (b). The patient was asymptomatic and not removed; thus, the exact nature of this foreign body is unknown

CT

CT is an effective method for suspected foreign objects that were not identified through radiography or ultrasound, particularly in the deeper compartments. CT is 5–15 times more sensitive than radiography and can even detect radiolucent objects such as plastic and wood [76]. A high specificity of 98% and moderate sensitivity of 68% has been suggested for CT in detecting foreign bodies of all types [77]. The appearance of foreign bodies on CT scans can vary, with acute cases showing a low-density area and chronically retained cases showing a high-density area [78].

MRI

On both T1- and T2-weighted images, foreign bodies appear as low signal or signal void to the muscles [79]. Metallic foreign bodies may demonstrate prominent blooming (susceptibility) artifact, especially on gradient echo or susceptibility-weighted imaging. However, identification of other small foreign bodies on MRI can be challenging. The main advantage of MRI over other imaging methods is superior soft tissue contrast, which can be helpful for identifying complications including infection. Thus, when infections are suspected, MRI is the method of choice. MRI also delineates soft tissue abscesses as thick-walled rim enhancing fluid collections, possibly with septations and internal debris, and will show restricted diffusion on DWI. It can also detect osteomyelitis with a sensitivity and specificity of 95% and 91%, respectively, which is classically manifested with bone marrow T2 hyperintensity and corresponding T1 hypointensity [80].

In summary, when foreign body granulomas are suspected, radiologic imaging such as X-rays, ultrasound, or MRI may show the presence of a foreign body. Ultrasound is useful for detecting retained material not seen by conventional radiography, especially for superficial foreign bodies. For deeper objects, CT or MRI may be necessary, with MRI preferred for accurate visualization of soft tissue and osseous complications [29]. Depending on its age and composition, the foreign body can appear as a well-defined or irregular-shaped object with surrounding inflammatory changes, such as edema and granuloma formation. Identification of low signal or signal void foreign bodies with a characteristic ring-like reactive lesion on MRI and hyperechoic lesions with posterior acoustic shadowing on sonography is important for correct diagnosis. To avoid preventable morbidities related to FBs, it is important to integrate the radiological findings with clinical history and physical examination to arrive at an accurate diagnosis.

Gout

Gout and infection are the main differentials in patients presenting with acute monoarthritis [81]. Failure to distinguish between these two diseases could lead to undesirable outcomes, such as joint damage or unnecessary surgical interventions. Clinical differentiation between acute gout and septic arthritis is challenging, and there may be cases where the two conditions coexist. Intraosseous gout can also mimic osteomyelitis (Fig. 16). Synovial fluid analysis is the preferred diagnostic tool for both conditions, which involves identifying monosodium urate crystals with a polarized microscope for gout and bacteria through gram staining or culture for septic arthritis. However, synovial fluid analysis is often impractical in clinical practice, and distinguishing between gout and septic arthritis remains challenging. In this setting, imaging may play an important role alongside the clinical and laboratory findings.Fig. 16 Eighty-five-year-old man with left fourth toe pain and swelling. AP radiograph (a) of the left foot demonstrates osseous destructive change of the fourth middle and distal phalanges (arrow), which could be mistaken for osteomyelitis. Dual-energy CT sagittal reformation (b), color map (c), and color-coded 3D reconstruction (d) demonstrate the gout (green, arrowheads) deposition, including intraosseous gout corresponding to the lytic areas (arrow). The calculated volume of monosodium urate deposition of the left foot was 5.99 cm.3

Radiography is useful in revealing the classic punched-out erosions with overhanging edges and tophi formation in chronic cases, as well as joint erosions and osseous destruction in recurrent episodes. Therefore, x-rays are frequently essential, and it may be the only necessary imaging modality for diagnosis. However, at initial acute presentation, radiography may only display non-specific soft tissue swelling, which can make diagnosis and management challenging. In this scenario, the use of more advanced imaging techniques, such as MRI, has the potential to serve as a valuable problem-solving tool. MRI findings can appear similar to those of infection, including joint effusion and soft tissue fluid collections with thick rim enhancement, as well as marrow edema and enhancement. However, the presence of gouty tophi can serve as a useful differentiating factor, which are typically low signal intensity on both T1- and T2-weighted images [82]. Dual-energy CT (DECT) has high diagnostic accuracy for the diagnosis of gout, with a sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 90% [83]. DECT material decomposition algorithms can be used to quantify the amount of monosodium urate deposition and follow-up treatment response [84]. Nevertheless, despite the importance of imaging, definitive diagnosis should be based on joint aspiration and synovial fluid analysis when there is clinical suspicion of septic arthritis or if a diagnosis of gout has not been conclusively established [85, 86].

Other inflammatory arthropathies

Other types of inflammatory arthropathies like rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) can also resemble infection both in clinical and radiographic manifestations, necessitating clinical suspicion of these conditions. Both RA and PsA can cause synovitis, tenosynovitis, and erosive changes, which can mimic septic arthritis [87]. RA is more likely to cause juxta-articular osteopenia and alignment deformities, and PsA is more likely to cause enthesitis, periostitis, and more likely to progress to fusion or arthritis mutilans with pencil-in-cup deformities (Fig. 17) [88]. PsA can also present as a spondyloarthritis with asymmetric sacroiliitis. Like gout, subsequent joint aspiration and fluid analysis can assist in making a definite diagnosis in challenging cases.Fig. 17 AP radiograph of the bilateral feet in a patient with psoriatic arthritis demonstrates arthritis mutilans with destructive pencil-in-cup deformities of the bilateral second through fifth metatarsophalangeal joints and fusion of the left first metatarsophalangeal and bilateral second through fifth proximal interphalangeal joints

Lymphedema

Lymphedema, whether primary or secondary, is typified by chronic swelling, localized pain, and atrophic skin changes. Currently, lymphedema is usually diagnosed based on a patient’s history and physical exam findings. However, lower extremity lymphedema can frequently be mistaken for other causes of extremity edema and enlargement, including infection. Additionally, lymphedema itself is highly susceptible to breakdown and subsequent infection, which further complicates the picture [89]. It is crucial to identify infection with or without lymphedema in patients with limb swelling, as this alters management strategies and prognosis. In this regard, imaging techniques (lymphoscintigraphy, ultrasonography, CT, and MRI) can assist in identifying lymphedema (Fig. 18).Fig. 18 Forty-year-old woman with gradual onset of right knee pain and swelling. Axial (a) and coronal (b) PD FS and coronal T1 (c) MRI images demonstrate extensive diffuse subcutaneous edema with a clinical diagnosis of lymphedema since 13 years of age. Cellulitis and edema of other causes could have a similar appearance on MRI

Lymphoscintigraphy (LSG)

Currently, LSG serves as the standard diagnostic test for confirming lymphedema. Abnormal LSG findings with delayed transit time of the radiolabeled colloid to regional lymph nodes, dermal backflow, asymmetric node uptake, and/or collateral lymphatic channels indicate impaired lymphatic function and aid in the diagnosis of lymphedema (Fig. 19) [90].Fig. 19 Sixty-one-year-old woman with stage IV vulvar cancer and right lower extremity lymphedema. Tc99m sulfur colloid lymphoscintigraphy (a) shows asymmetric and delayed passage of tracer activity in the right lower extremity lymphatics (arrows) compared to the left, not reaching the right inguinal lymph node (curved arrow) until 40 min after injection. Delayed images (b) show extensive dermal backflow of the right lower extremity (arrowheads) throughout the thigh and lower right leg

Lymphography

Lymphography involves injecting radio-opaque material directly into the peripheral lymph vessels. However, it is rarely performed due to the potential risk of vessel damage.

Duplex ultrasound (DUS)

DUS is usually the initial imaging test of choice to evaluate leg swelling. While it cannot image the lymphatic vasculature, the ultrasound characteristics of the edematous limb can provide valuable information regarding the underlying cause of the edema. In addition, DUS can grade the severity of lymphedema. Increased skin thickness, subcutaneous tissue thickness, and echogenicity of the fat with a blurred interface between the subcutaneous fat and skin are all indicative of lymphedema on ultrasound [91]. Lastly, ultrasound can help distinguish between cellulitis and abscess by identifying the presence or absence of a discrete organized fluid collection.

MRI

Magnetic resonance lymphangiography (MRL) can accurately evaluate lymphatic obstruction and lymph node involvement in patients with lymphedema by generating high-quality images of the lymphatic vessels. MRI is non-invasive, has improved sensitivity and specificity, and can detect lymphatic abnormalities in the early stages, the latter of which is crucial for effective management. MRL allows for a more accurate evaluation of lymphatic obstruction and lymph node involvement [92].

In summary, while a combination of medical history, physical examination, and diagnostic testing is necessary to accurately diagnose lower extremity lymphedema, effort should also be made to exclude infection using laboratory studies. If there is concern for both lymphedema and infection, a combination of imaging studies and clinical information should be used to arrive at an accurate diagnosis.

Morel-Lavallée lesion

Morel Lavallée lesions (MLLs) represent a type of closed internal degloving injury characterized by the separation of the skin and subcutaneous tissue from the underlying fascia, resulting in a fluid-filled cavity. While MLLs can develop anywhere exposed to shear forces, certain regions are more susceptible, including the knee, greater trochanter, and anterolateral thigh, due to greater mobility of the dermis and subcutaneous tissues [93]. Despite being described over a century ago, MLL remains challenging to diagnose and manage due to their variable clinical presentation and potential complications, including infections that may share similar symptoms with MLL. Differential diagnosis between MLL and lower extremity infection is essential because management differs significantly. Radiological findings, which depend on the lesion’s chronology, can assist in the diagnosis of MLL, but a combination of clinical, imaging, and laboratory findings is necessary.

Ultrasound

US is a cost-effective method for evaluating subcutaneous or supra-fascial fluid collections, including MLL. On ultrasound, MLL appears as a well-defined, compressible, hypoechoic fluid collection with a thin, hyperechoic capsule, and a characteristic location between the subcutaneous fat and fascia [94]. Nodular echogenicity on ultrasound can aid in the identification of MLLs, indicating a disruption of subdermal fat globules and subsequent necrosis. However, despite being sensitive for detection of subdermal fluid collections and being helpful in many cases, the sonographic appearance remains relatively nonspecific, and may resemble other conditions, such as hematoma, inflammatory collection, myxoid or necrotic neoplasm, fat necrosis, or complex bursitis.

CT

Multidetector CT is useful for visualizing MLLs, particularly in patients with polytrauma. MLLs on CT have a characteristic subdermal location and may display internal complexity with a fluid–fluid layer. Compared to simple hematomas, MLLs have lower overall density. Internal islands of lipomatous density consistent with sheared fat globules may aid in further characterization of the lesion [95]. As the lesion evolves over time, there is a progressive encapsulation with potential marginal enhancement [96]. However, the overall diagnostic value of CT in identifying MLL lesions is limited, as it only confirms the presence of a fluid collection without providing much information about the lesion’s composition or density. Therefore, other imaging modalities may be more effective in assessing these characteristics.

MRI

When clinical suspicion arises, MRI is the preferred imaging modality for MLL. The appearance of the lesion on MRI depends on its content and chronicity. Chronic MLL lesions are characterized by a well-defined fluid collection with a thin, hypointense capsule on T1-weighted images and hyperintense on T2-weighted images (Fig. 20) [97]. The use of fat-saturated images helps identify lipogenous foci and intralesional T1 hyperintensity. Heterogeneous T1 hyperintense areas can be seen corresponding to intracellular and extracellular methemoglobin, aiding in lesion characterization. A low T1 or T2 hemosiderin ring may become visible in conjunction with fibrous capsular formation as the lesion matures. Internal and peripheral enhancement may be noted, and areas of lipomatous signal intensity may correspond to sheared globules of subdermal fat [98, 99].Fig. 20 Morel-Lavallée lesions mimicking abscess and hematoma. Fifty-five-year-old man with left thigh masses and worsening pain. Axial T1 (a), STIR (b), and T1 FS pre- (c) and post-contrast (d) MRI images demonstrate two perifascial left thigh subcutaneous fluid collections. The anterior collection (arrow) is T1 isointense, STIR hyperintense, and has rim enhancement, which can mimic the appearance of an abscess. The lateral collection (arrowhead) is predominantly T1 and STIR hyperintense with a hypointense rim and areas of mural nodularity (retracted clots, curved arrow, c), which could mimic a hematoma. However, these represent type I (anterior) and type III (lateral) Morel-Lavallée lesions with a history of subacute trauma subsequently elicited

In summary, differentiating MLL from other conditions such as lower extremity infections can be challenging due to their variable clinical presentation. However, the combination of a traumatic history and the presence of a thin capsule surrounding a fluid-filled cavity in the subcutaneous tissue, along with islands of internal fat on various imaging modalities, can aid in the diagnosis of MLL. These discriminating features are important to consider for accurate identification and management of MLL.

Conclusion

Lower extremity infection is an increasingly common cause of morbidity, and imaging plays a crucial role in evaluation. It is critical for the radiologist to be able to differentiate infection from non-infectious imaging features that can be associated with underlying conditions such as diabetes mellitus, peripheral arterial disease, and neuropathic arthropathy, and other mimics such as chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis, foreign body granuloma, gout, inflammatory arthropathies, lymphedema, and Morel-Lavallée lesions. Although less common, it is also important for the radiologist to be familiar with the imaging manifestations of atypical infections, such as viral, mycobacterial, fungal, and parasitic infections, particularly in immunocompromised patients, those from endemic areas, or in patients with a history of travel.

Funding

Open access funding provided by SCELC, Statewide California Electronic Library Consortium

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Key points

• Radiologists must understand imaging features associated with underlying conditions, such as diabetes mellitus, peripheral arterial disease, and neuropathic arthropathy, and identify when there is superimposed infection.

• Knowledge of imaging features of atypical viral, mycobacterial, fungal, and parasitic infections is important, especially in immunocompromised patients or those from or with a history of travel to endemic regions.

• Radiologists must recognize potential mimics of lower extremity infection including chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis, foreign body granuloma, gout, inflammatory arthropathies, lymphedema, and Morel-Lavallée lesions, and their differentiating features.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. Tsang KW Morrison WB Update: imaging of lower extremity infection Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2016 20 2 175 191 10.1055/s-0036-1581116 27336452
Tsang KW, Morrison WB. Update: imaging of lower extremity infection. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2016;20(2):175–91.27336452 10.1055/s-0036-1581116
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Statistics Report. 2022. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/statistics-report. Accessed 6 May 2023.
3. Lipsky BA Berendt AR Deery HG Diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections Plast Reconstr Surg 2006 117 7 Suppl 212S 238S 10.1097/01.prs.0000222737.09322.77 16799390
Lipsky BA, Berendt AR, Deery HG, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(7 Suppl):212S-238S.16799390 10.1097/01.prs.0000222737.09322.77
4. Rubitschung K, Sherwood A, Crisologo AP, et al. Pathophysiology and molecular imaging of diabetic foot infections. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(21):11552.
5. Rask-Madsen C King GL Vascular complications of diabetes: mechanisms of injury and protective factors Cell Metab 2013 17 1 20 33 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.11.012 23312281
Rask-Madsen C, King GL. Vascular complications of diabetes: mechanisms of injury and protective factors. Cell Metab. 2013;17(1):20–33.23312281 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.11.012
6. Stacey HJ Clements CS Welburn SC Jones JD The prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among diabetic patients: a meta-analysis Acta Diabetol 2019 56 8 907 921 10.1007/s00592-019-01301-0 30955124
Stacey HJ, Clements CS, Welburn SC, Jones JD. The prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among diabetic patients: a meta-analysis. Acta Diabetol. 2019;56(8):907–21.30955124 10.1007/s00592-019-01301-0
7. Giha HA Sater MS Alamin OAO Diabetes mellitus tendino-myopathy: epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis and management of an overlooked diabetic complication Acta Diabetol 2022 59 7 871 883 10.1007/s00592-022-01860-9 35291027
Giha HA, Sater MS, Alamin OAO. Diabetes mellitus tendino-myopathy: epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis and management of an overlooked diabetic complication. Acta Diabetol. 2022;59(7):871–83.35291027 10.1007/s00592-022-01860-9
8. Monaco CMF Perry CGR Hawke TJ Diabetic myopathy: current molecular understanding of this novel neuromuscular disorder Curr Opin Neurol 2017 30 5 545 552 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000479 28665810
Monaco CMF, Perry CGR, Hawke TJ. Diabetic myopathy: current molecular understanding of this novel neuromuscular disorder. Curr Opin Neurol. 2017;30(5):545–52.28665810 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000479
9. Huang BK Monu JU Doumanian J Diabetic myopathy: MRI patterns and current trends AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010 195 1 198 204 10.2214/AJR.09.2494 20566817
Huang BK, Monu JU, Doumanian J. Diabetic myopathy: MRI patterns and current trends. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195(1):198–204.20566817 10.2214/AJR.09.2494
10. Choudhury BK Saikia UK Sarma D Saikia M Choudhury SD Bhuyan D Diabetic myonecrosis: an underreported complication of diabetes mellitus Indian J Endocrinol Metab 2011 15 Suppl 1 S58 61 21847458
Choudhury BK, Saikia UK, Sarma D, Saikia M, Choudhury SD, Bhuyan D. Diabetic myonecrosis: an underreported complication of diabetes mellitus. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2011;15(Suppl 1):S58-61.21847458
11. Delaney-Sathy LO Fessell DP Jacobson JA Hayes CW Sonography of diabetic muscle infarction with MR imaging, CT, and pathologic correlation AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000 174 1 165 169 10.2214/ajr.174.1.1740165 10628474
Delaney-Sathy LO, Fessell DP, Jacobson JA, Hayes CW. Sonography of diabetic muscle infarction with MR imaging, CT, and pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174(1):165–9.10628474 10.2214/ajr.174.1.1740165
12. Cunningham J Sharma R Kirzner A Acute myonecrosis on MRI: etiologies in an oncological cohort and assessment of interobserver variability Skeletal Radiol 2016 45 8 1069 1078 10.1007/s00256-016-2389-4 27105618
Cunningham J, Sharma R, Kirzner A, et al. Acute myonecrosis on MRI: etiologies in an oncological cohort and assessment of interobserver variability. Skeletal Radiol. 2016;45(8):1069–78.27105618 10.1007/s00256-016-2389-4
13. Loredo R Rahal A Garcia G Metter D Imaging of the diabetic foot diagnostic dilemmas Foot Ankle Spec 2010 3 5 249 264 10.1177/1938640010383154 20966452
Loredo R, Rahal A, Garcia G, Metter D. Imaging of the diabetic foot diagnostic dilemmas. Foot Ankle Spec. 2010;3(5):249–64.20966452 10.1177/1938640010383154
14. Morrison WB Ledermann HP Work-up of the diabetic foot Radiol Clin North Am 2002 40 5 1171 1192 10.1016/S0033-8389(02)00036-2 12462475
Morrison WB, Ledermann HP. Work-up of the diabetic foot. Radiol Clin North Am. 2002;40(5):1171–92.12462475 10.1016/S0033-8389(02)00036-2
15. Charcot JM Sur quelques arthropathies qui paraissent dépendre d’une lesion du cerveau ou de la moëlle épinière Arch Physiol Norm Pathol 1868 1 161 178
Charcot JM. Sur quelques arthropathies qui paraissent dépendre d’une lesion du cerveau ou de la moëlle épinière. Arch Physiol Norm Pathol. 1868;1:161–78.
16 Jones EA Manaster BJ May DA Disler DG Neuropathic osteoarthropathy: diagnostic dilemmas and differential diagnosis Radiographics 2000 20 Spec No S279 293 10.1148/radiographics.20.suppl_1.g00oc22s279 11046179
Jones EA, Manaster BJ, May DA, Disler DG. Neuropathic osteoarthropathy: diagnostic dilemmas and differential diagnosis. Radiographics. 2000;20 Spec No:S279-293.11046179 10.1148/radiographics.20.suppl_1.g00oc22s279
17. Leone A Cassar-Pullicino VN Semprini A Tonetti L Magarelli N Colosimo C Neuropathic osteoarthropathy with and without superimposed osteomyelitis in patients with a diabetic foot Skeletal Radiol 2016 45 6 735 754 10.1007/s00256-016-2339-1 26883537
Leone A, Cassar-Pullicino VN, Semprini A, Tonetti L, Magarelli N, Colosimo C. Neuropathic osteoarthropathy with and without superimposed osteomyelitis in patients with a diabetic foot. Skeletal Radiol. 2016;45(6):735–54.26883537 10.1007/s00256-016-2339-1
18. Ergen FB, Sanverdi SE, Oznur A. Charcot foot in diabetes and an update on imaging. Diabet Foot Ankle. 2013;20:4.
19. Tan PL Teh J MRI of the diabetic foot: differentiation of infection from neuropathic change Br J Radiol 2007 80 959 939 948 10.1259/bjr/30036666 16687463
Tan PL, Teh J. MRI of the diabetic foot: differentiation of infection from neuropathic change. Br J Radiol. 2007;80(959):939–48.16687463 10.1259/bjr/30036666
20. Rosskopf AB Loupatatzis C Pfirrmann CWA Boni T Berli MC The Charcot foot: a pictorial review Insights Imaging 2019 10 1 77 10.1186/s13244-019-0768-9 31385060
Rosskopf AB, Loupatatzis C, Pfirrmann CWA, Boni T, Berli MC. The Charcot foot: a pictorial review. Insights Imaging. 2019;10(1):77.31385060 10.1186/s13244-019-0768-9
21. Eguchi Y Ohtori S Yamashita M Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging to differentiate degenerative from infectious endplate abnormalities in the lumbar spine Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011 36 3 E198 202 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d5ff05 21099738
Eguchi Y, Ohtori S, Yamashita M, et al. Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging to differentiate degenerative from infectious endplate abnormalities in the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(3):E198-202.21099738 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d5ff05
22. Martin Noguerol T Luna Alcala A Beltran LS Gomez Cabrera M Broncano Cabrero J Vilanova JC Advanced MR imaging techniques for differentiation of neuropathic arthropathy and osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot Radiographics 2017 37 4 1161 1180 10.1148/rg.2017160101 28696850
Martin Noguerol T, Luna Alcala A, Beltran LS, Gomez Cabrera M, Broncano Cabrero J, Vilanova JC. Advanced MR imaging techniques for differentiation of neuropathic arthropathy and osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot. Radiographics. 2017;37(4):1161–80.28696850 10.1148/rg.2017160101
23. Lauri C Tamminga M Glaudemans A Detection of osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot by imaging techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing MRI, white blood cell scintigraphy, and FDG-PET Diabetes Care 2017 40 8 1111 1120 10.2337/dc17-0532 28733376
Lauri C, Tamminga M, Glaudemans A, et al. Detection of osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot by imaging techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing MRI, white blood cell scintigraphy, and FDG-PET. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(8):1111–20.28733376 10.2337/dc17-0532
24. Palestro CJ Mehta HH Patel M Marrow versus infection in the Charcot joint: Indium-111 leukocyte and technetium-99m sulfur colloid scintigraphy J Nucl Med 1998 39 2 346 350 9476948
Palestro CJ, Mehta HH, Patel M, et al. Marrow versus infection in the Charcot joint: Indium-111 leukocyte and technetium-99m sulfur colloid scintigraphy. J Nucl Med. 1998;39(2):346–50.9476948
25. Canales M Gerhard J Younce E Lower extremity manifestations of "skin-popping" an illicit drug use technique: a report of two cases Foot (Edinb) 2015 25 2 114 119 10.1016/j.foot.2015.03.003 26001995
Canales M, Gerhard J, Younce E. Lower extremity manifestations of “skin-popping” an illicit drug use technique: a report of two cases. Foot (Edinb). 2015;25(2):114–9.26001995 10.1016/j.foot.2015.03.003
26. Darke S Ross J Kaye S Physical injecting sites among injecting drug users in Sydney, Australia Drug Alcohol Depend 2001 62 1 77 82 10.1016/S0376-8716(00)00161-7 11173170
Darke S, Ross J, Kaye S. Physical injecting sites among injecting drug users in Sydney, Australia. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2001;62(1):77–82.11173170 10.1016/S0376-8716(00)00161-7
27. Doran J Hope V Wright T Scott J Ciccarone D Harris M Prevalence and factors associated with chronic venous insufficiency, leg ulceration and deep-vein thrombosis among people who inject drugs in London, UK Drug Alcohol Rev 2022 41 3 677 685 10.1111/dar.13389 34605086
Doran J, Hope V, Wright T, Scott J, Ciccarone D, Harris M. Prevalence and factors associated with chronic venous insufficiency, leg ulceration and deep-vein thrombosis among people who inject drugs in London, UK. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2022;41(3):677–85.34605086 10.1111/dar.13389
28. Pirozzi K Van JC Pontious J Meyr AJ Demographic description of the presentation and treatment of lower extremity skin and soft tissue infections secondary to skin popping in intravenous drug abusers J Foot Ankle Surg 2014 53 2 156 159 10.1053/j.jfas.2013.12.017 24556482
Pirozzi K, Van JC, Pontious J, Meyr AJ. Demographic description of the presentation and treatment of lower extremity skin and soft tissue infections secondary to skin popping in intravenous drug abusers. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2014;53(2):156–9.24556482 10.1053/j.jfas.2013.12.017
29. Spinnato P, Patel DB, Di Carlo M, et al. Imaging of musculoskeletal soft-tissue infections in clinical practice: a comprehensive updated review. Microorganisms. 2022;10(12):2329.
30. Chhem RK Wang S Jaovisidha S Imaging of fungal, viral, and parasitic musculoskeletal and spinal diseases Radiol Clin North Am 2001 39 2 357 378 10.1016/S0033-8389(05)70282-7 11316364
Chhem RK, Wang S, Jaovisidha S, et al. Imaging of fungal, viral, and parasitic musculoskeletal and spinal diseases. Radiol Clin North Am. 2001;39(2):357–78.11316364 10.1016/S0033-8389(05)70282-7
31. Goupil BA Mores CN A review of Chikungunya virus-induced arthralgia: clinical manifestations, therapeutics, and pathogenesis Open Rheumatol J 2016 10 129 140 10.2174/1874312901610010129 28077980
Goupil BA, Mores CN. A review of Chikungunya virus-induced arthralgia: clinical manifestations, therapeutics, and pathogenesis. Open Rheumatol J. 2016;10:129–40.28077980 10.2174/1874312901610010129
32. Amaral JK Bingham CO 3rd Taylor PC Vila LM Weinblatt ME Schoen RT Pathogenesis of chronic chikungunya arthritis: resemblances and links with rheumatoid arthritis Travel Med Infect Dis 2023 52 102534 10.1016/j.tmaid.2022.102534 36549417
Amaral JK, Bingham CO 3rd, Taylor PC, Vila LM, Weinblatt ME, Schoen RT. Pathogenesis of chronic chikungunya arthritis: resemblances and links with rheumatoid arthritis. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2023;52:102534.36549417 10.1016/j.tmaid.2022.102534
33 Bouquillard E Combe B A report of 21 cases of rheumatoid arthritis following Chikungunya fever. A mean follow-up of two years Joint Bone Spine 2009 76 6 654 657 10.1016/j.jbspin.2009.08.005 19945329
Bouquillard E, Combe B. A report of 21 cases of rheumatoid arthritis following Chikungunya fever. A mean follow-up of two years. Joint Bone Spine. 2009;76(6):654–7.19945329 10.1016/j.jbspin.2009.08.005
34. Malvy D Ezzedine K Mamani-Matsuda M Destructive arthritis in a patient with chikungunya virus infection with persistent specific IgM antibodies BMC Infect Dis 2009 9 200 10.1186/1471-2334-9-200 20003320
Malvy D, Ezzedine K, Mamani-Matsuda M, et al. Destructive arthritis in a patient with chikungunya virus infection with persistent specific IgM antibodies. BMC Infect Dis. 2009;9:200.20003320 10.1186/1471-2334-9-200
35. Kanmaniraja D Le J Hsu K Review of COVID-19, part 2: musculoskeletal and neuroimaging manifestations including vascular involvement of the aorta and extremities Clin Imaging 2021 79 300 313 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.08.003 34388683
Kanmaniraja D, Le J, Hsu K, et al. Review of COVID-19, part 2: musculoskeletal and neuroimaging manifestations including vascular involvement of the aorta and extremities. Clin Imaging. 2021;79:300–13.34388683 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.08.003
36. Ramani SL Samet J Franz CK Musculoskeletal involvement of COVID-19: review of imaging Skeletal Radiol 2021 50 9 1763 1773 10.1007/s00256-021-03734-7 33598718
Ramani SL, Samet J, Franz CK, et al. Musculoskeletal involvement of COVID-19: review of imaging. Skeletal Radiol. 2021;50(9):1763–73.33598718 10.1007/s00256-021-03734-7
37. Omar IM Weaver JS Samet JD Serhal AM Mar WA Taljanovic MS Musculoskeletal manifestations of COVID-19: currently described clinical symptoms and multimodality imaging findings Radiographics 2022 42 5 1415 1432 10.1148/rg.220036 35867593
Omar IM, Weaver JS, Samet JD, Serhal AM, Mar WA, Taljanovic MS. Musculoskeletal manifestations of COVID-19: currently described clinical symptoms and multimodality imaging findings. Radiographics. 2022;42(5):1415–32.35867593 10.1148/rg.220036
38. Gambhir S Ravina M Rangan K Imaging in extrapulmonary tuberculosis Int J Infect Dis 2017 56 237 247 10.1016/j.ijid.2016.11.003 27838445
Gambhir S, Ravina M, Rangan K, et al. Imaging in extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Int J Infect Dis. 2017;56:237–47.27838445 10.1016/j.ijid.2016.11.003
39. Rodriguez-Takeuchi SY Renjifo ME Medina FJ Extrapulmonary tuberculosis: pathophysiology and imaging findings Radiographics 2019 39 7 2023 2037 10.1148/rg.2019190109 31697616
Rodriguez-Takeuchi SY, Renjifo ME, Medina FJ. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis: pathophysiology and imaging findings. Radiographics. 2019;39(7):2023–37.31697616 10.1148/rg.2019190109
40. Baykan AH Sayiner HS Aydin E Koc M Inan I Erturk SM Extrapulmonary tuberculosis: an old but resurgent problem Insights Imaging 2022 13 1 39 10.1186/s13244-022-01172-0 35254534
Baykan AH, Sayiner HS, Aydin E, Koc M, Inan I, Erturk SM. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis: an old but resurgent problem. Insights Imaging. 2022;13(1):39.35254534 10.1186/s13244-022-01172-0
41. Chattopadhyay A Sharma A Gupta K Jain S The phemister triad Lancet 2018 391 10135 e20 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30986-3 29856345
Chattopadhyay A, Sharma A, Gupta K, Jain S. The phemister triad. Lancet. 2018;391(10135): e20.29856345 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30986-3
42. De Vuyst D Vanhoenacker F Gielen J Bernaerts A De Schepper AM Imaging features of musculoskeletal tuberculosis Eur Radiol 2003 13 8 1809 1819 10.1007/s00330-002-1609-6 12942283
De Vuyst D, Vanhoenacker F, Gielen J, Bernaerts A, De Schepper AM. Imaging features of musculoskeletal tuberculosis. Eur Radiol. 2003;13(8):1809–19.12942283 10.1007/s00330-002-1609-6
43. Griffith JF Kumta SM Leung PC Cheng JC Chow LT Metreweli C Imaging of musculoskeletal tuberculosis: a new look at an old disease Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002 398 32 39 10.1097/00003086-200205000-00006
Griffith JF, Kumta SM, Leung PC, Cheng JC, Chow LT, Metreweli C. Imaging of musculoskeletal tuberculosis: a new look at an old disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;398:32–9.10.1097/00003086-200205000-00006
44. Shikhare SN Singh DR Shimpi TR Peh WC Tuberculous osteomyelitis and spondylodiscitis Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2011 15 5 446 458 10.1055/s-0031-1293491 22081280
Shikhare SN, Singh DR, Shimpi TR, Peh WC. Tuberculous osteomyelitis and spondylodiscitis. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2011;15(5):446–58.22081280 10.1055/s-0031-1293491
45. Engin G Acunas B Acunas G Tunaci M Imaging of extrapulmonary tuberculosis Radiographics. 2000 20 2 471 488 10.1148/radiographics.20.2.g00mc07471 10715344
Engin G, Acunas B, Acunas G, Tunaci M. Imaging of extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Radiographics. 2000;20(2):471–88 (quiz 529-430, 532).10715344 10.1148/radiographics.20.2.g00mc07471
46. Theodorou DJ Theodorou SJ Kakitsubata Y Sartoris DJ Resnick D Imaging characteristics and epidemiologic features of atypical mycobacterial infections involving the musculoskeletal system AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001 176 2 341 349 10.2214/ajr.176.2.1760341 11159070
Theodorou DJ, Theodorou SJ, Kakitsubata Y, Sartoris DJ, Resnick D. Imaging characteristics and epidemiologic features of atypical mycobacterial infections involving the musculoskeletal system. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176(2):341–9.11159070 10.2214/ajr.176.2.1760341
47. Chapman M Murray RO Stoker DJ Tuberculosis of the bones and joints Semin Roentgenol 1979 14 4 266 282 10.1016/0037-198X(79)90024-5 386521
Chapman M, Murray RO, Stoker DJ. Tuberculosis of the bones and joints. Semin Roentgenol. 1979;14(4):266–82.386521 10.1016/0037-198X(79)90024-5
48. Sabin TD, Swift TR, Jacobson RR. Leprosy. In: Dyck PJ, Thomas PK, editors. Peripheral neuropathy. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1993:1354–1379.
49. Martinoli C Derchi LE Bertolotto M US and MR imaging of peripheral nerves in leprosy Skeletal Radiol 2000 29 3 142 150 10.1007/s002560050584 10794551
Martinoli C, Derchi LE, Bertolotto M, et al. US and MR imaging of peripheral nerves in leprosy. Skeletal Radiol. 2000;29(3):142–50.10794551 10.1007/s002560050584
50. Gibson T Ahsan Q Hussein K Arthritis of leprosy Br J Rheumatol 1994 33 10 963 966 10.1093/rheumatology/33.10.963 7921759
Gibson T, Ahsan Q, Hussein K. Arthritis of leprosy. Br J Rheumatol. 1994;33(10):963–6.7921759 10.1093/rheumatology/33.10.963
51. Horibe S Tada K Nagano J Neuroarthropathy of the foot in leprosy J Bone Joint Surg Br 1988 70 3 481 485 10.1302/0301-620X.70B3.3372576 3372576
Horibe S, Tada K, Nagano J. Neuroarthropathy of the foot in leprosy. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988;70(3):481–5.3372576 10.1302/0301-620X.70B3.3372576
52. Roche CJ O'Keeffe DP Lee WK Duddalwar VA Torreggiani WC Curtis JM Selections from the buffet of food signs in radiology Radiographics 2002 22 6 1369 1384 10.1148/rg.226025521 12432108
Roche CJ, O’Keeffe DP, Lee WK, Duddalwar VA, Torreggiani WC, Curtis JM. Selections from the buffet of food signs in radiology. Radiographics. 2002;22(6):1369–84.12432108 10.1148/rg.226025521
53. Verma P Jha A Mycetoma: reviewing a neglected disease Clin Exp Dermatol 2019 44 2 123 129 10.1111/ced.13642 29808607
Verma P, Jha A. Mycetoma: reviewing a neglected disease. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2019;44(2):123–9.29808607 10.1111/ced.13642
54. Abd El Bagi ME New radiographic classification of bone involvement in pedal mycetoma AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003 180 3 665 668 10.2214/ajr.180.3.1800665 12591671
Abd El Bagi ME. New radiographic classification of bone involvement in pedal mycetoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180(3):665–8.12591671 10.2214/ajr.180.3.1800665
55. White EA Patel DB Forrester DM Madura foot: two case reports, review of the literature, and new developments with clinical correlation Skeletal Radiol 2014 43 4 547 553 10.1007/s00256-013-1751-z 24150831
White EA, Patel DB, Forrester DM, et al. Madura foot: two case reports, review of the literature, and new developments with clinical correlation. Skeletal Radiol. 2014;43(4):547–53.24150831 10.1007/s00256-013-1751-z
56 Sarris I Berendt AR Athanasous N Ostlere SJ group Ocs MRI of mycetoma of the foot: Two cases demonstrating the dot-in-circle sign Skeletal Radiol 2003 32 3 179 183 10.1007/s00256-002-0600-2 12605286
Sarris I, Berendt AR, Athanasous N, Ostlere SJ, group Ocs. MRI of mycetoma of the foot: Two cases demonstrating the dot-in-circle sign. Skeletal Radiol. 2003;32(3):179–83.12605286 10.1007/s00256-002-0600-2
57. Orlowski HLP McWilliams S Mellnick VM Imaging spectrum of invasive fungal and fungal-like infections Radiographics 2017 37 4 1119 1134 10.1148/rg.2017160110 28622118
Orlowski HLP, McWilliams S, Mellnick VM, et al. Imaging spectrum of invasive fungal and fungal-like infections. Radiographics. 2017;37(4):1119–34.28622118 10.1148/rg.2017160110
58. Corr PD Musculoskeletal fungal infections Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2011 15 5 506 510 10.1055/s-0031-1293496 22081285
Corr PD. Musculoskeletal fungal infections. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2011;15(5):506–10.22081285 10.1055/s-0031-1293496
59. Taxy JB Kodros S Musculoskeletal coccidioidomycosis: unusual sites of disease in a nonendemic area Am J Clin Pathol 2005 124 5 693 696 10.1309/KRNYU4RN7Q12WEYD 16203277
Taxy JB, Kodros S. Musculoskeletal coccidioidomycosis: unusual sites of disease in a nonendemic area. Am J Clin Pathol. 2005;124(5):693–6.16203277 10.1309/KRNYU4RN7Q12WEYD
60. Zeppa MA Laorr A Greenspan A McGahan JP Steinbach LS Skeletal coccidioidomycosis: imaging findings in 19 patients Skeletal Radiol 1996 25 4 337 343 10.1007/s002560050092 8737998
Zeppa MA, Laorr A, Greenspan A, McGahan JP, Steinbach LS. Skeletal coccidioidomycosis: imaging findings in 19 patients. Skeletal Radiol. 1996;25(4):337–43.8737998 10.1007/s002560050092
61. McGahan JP Graves DS Palmer PE Stadalnik RC Dublin AB Classic and contemporary imaging of coccidioidomycosis AJR Am J Roentgenol 1981 136 2 393 404 10.2214/ajr.136.2.393 6781265
McGahan JP, Graves DS, Palmer PE, Stadalnik RC, Dublin AB. Classic and contemporary imaging of coccidioidomycosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1981;136(2):393–404.6781265 10.2214/ajr.136.2.393
62. Akinyoola AL Onayemi O Famurewa OC African histoplasmosis—masquerading as a malignant bone tumour Trop Doct 2006 36 4 250 251 10.1258/004947506778604922 17034712
Akinyoola AL, Onayemi O, Famurewa OC. African histoplasmosis—masquerading as a malignant bone tumour. Trop Doct. 2006;36(4):250–1.17034712 10.1258/004947506778604922
63. Arkun R Parasitic and fungal disease of bones and joints Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2004 8 3 231 242 10.1055/s-2004-835363 15478026
Arkun R. Parasitic and fungal disease of bones and joints. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2004;8(3):231–42.15478026 10.1055/s-2004-835363
64. Arkun R Mete BD Musculoskeletal hydatid disease Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2011 15 5 527 540 10.1055/s-0031-1293498 22081287
Arkun R, Mete BD. Musculoskeletal hydatid disease. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2011;15(5):527–40.22081287 10.1055/s-0031-1293498
65. Pedrosa I Saiz A Arrazola J Ferreiros J Pedrosa CS Hydatid disease: radiologic and pathologic features and complications Radiographics 2000 20 3 795 817 10.1148/radiographics.20.3.g00ma06795 10835129
Pedrosa I, Saiz A, Arrazola J, Ferreiros J, Pedrosa CS. Hydatid disease: radiologic and pathologic features and complications. Radiographics. 2000;20(3):795–817.10835129 10.1148/radiographics.20.3.g00ma06795
66. Tévez-Craise L Daiana-Vaccaro R De Luca PA Vásquez-Guillén ME Calaramo OA Logioco F Hydatidosis: clinical-imaging classification according to Gharbi and the World Health Organization Rev Argent Radiol 2022 86 1 41 48
Tévez-Craise L, Daiana-Vaccaro R, De Luca PA, Vásquez-Guillén ME, Calaramo OA, Logioco F. Hydatidosis: clinical-imaging classification according to Gharbi and the World Health Organization. Rev Argent Radiol. 2022;86(1):41–8.
67. Zhao DY McCann L Hahn G Hedrich CM Chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis (CNO) and chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO) J Transl Autoimmun 2021 4 100095 10.1016/j.jtauto.2021.100095 33870159
Zhao DY, McCann L, Hahn G, Hedrich CM. Chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis (CNO) and chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO). J Transl Autoimmun. 2021;4:100095.33870159 10.1016/j.jtauto.2021.100095
68. Fritz J Tzaribatchev N Claussen CD Carrino JA Horger MS Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis: comparison of whole-body MR imaging with radiography and correlation with clinical and laboratory data Radiology 2009 252 3 842 851 10.1148/radiol.2523081335 19567645
Fritz J, Tzaribatchev N, Claussen CD, Carrino JA, Horger MS. Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis: comparison of whole-body MR imaging with radiography and correlation with clinical and laboratory data. Radiology. 2009;252(3):842–51.19567645 10.1148/radiol.2523081335
69. Gaal A Basiaga ML Zhao Y Egbert M Pediatric chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis of the mandible: Seattle children's hospital 22-patient experience Pediatr Rheumatol Online J 2020 18 1 4 10.1186/s12969-019-0384-8 31941491
Gaal A, Basiaga ML, Zhao Y, Egbert M. Pediatric chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis of the mandible: Seattle children’s hospital 22-patient experience. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2020;18(1):4.31941491 10.1186/s12969-019-0384-8
70. Nico MAC Araujo FF Guimaraes JB Chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis: the role of whole-body MRI Insights Imaging 2022 13 1 149 10.1186/s13244-022-01288-3 36114435
Nico MAC, Araujo FF, Guimaraes JB, et al. Chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis: the role of whole-body MRI. Insights Imaging. 2022;13(1):149.36114435 10.1186/s13244-022-01288-3
71. Ipaktchi K Demars A Park J Ciarallo C Livermore M Banegas R Retained palmar foreign body presenting as a late hand infection: proposed diagnostic algorithm to detect radiolucent objects Patient Saf Surg 2013 7 1 25 10.1186/1754-9493-7-25 23844904
Ipaktchi K, Demars A, Park J, Ciarallo C, Livermore M, Banegas R. Retained palmar foreign body presenting as a late hand infection: proposed diagnostic algorithm to detect radiolucent objects. Patient Saf Surg. 2013;7(1):25.23844904 10.1186/1754-9493-7-25
72. Peterson JJ Bancroft LW Kransdorf MJ Wooden foreign bodies: imaging appearance AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002 178 3 557 562 10.2214/ajr.178.3.1780557 11856673
Peterson JJ, Bancroft LW, Kransdorf MJ. Wooden foreign bodies: imaging appearance. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178(3):557–62.11856673 10.2214/ajr.178.3.1780557
73. Horton LK Jacobson JA Powell A Fessell DP Hayes CW Sonography and radiography of soft-tissue foreign bodies AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001 176 5 1155 1159 10.2214/ajr.176.5.1761155 11312171
Horton LK, Jacobson JA, Powell A, Fessell DP, Hayes CW. Sonography and radiography of soft-tissue foreign bodies. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176(5):1155–9.11312171 10.2214/ajr.176.5.1761155
74. Shiels WE 2nd Babcock DS Wilson JL Burch RA Localization and guided removal of soft-tissue foreign bodies with sonography AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990 155 6 1277 1281 10.2214/ajr.155.6.2122680 2122680
Shiels WE 2nd, Babcock DS, Wilson JL, Burch RA. Localization and guided removal of soft-tissue foreign bodies with sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990;155(6):1277–81.2122680 10.2214/ajr.155.6.2122680
75. Jarraya M Hayashi D de Villiers RV Multimodality imaging of foreign bodies of the musculoskeletal system AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014 203 1 W92 102 10.2214/AJR.13.11743 24951233
Jarraya M, Hayashi D, de Villiers RV, et al. Multimodality imaging of foreign bodies of the musculoskeletal system. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;203(1):W92-102.24951233 10.2214/AJR.13.11743
76. Aras MH Miloglu O Barutcugil C Kantarci M Ozcan E Harorli A Comparison of the sensitivity for detecting foreign bodies among conventional plain radiography, computed tomography and ultrasonography Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010 39 2 72 78 10.1259/dmfr/68589458 20100917
Aras MH, Miloglu O, Barutcugil C, Kantarci M, Ozcan E, Harorli A. Comparison of the sensitivity for detecting foreign bodies among conventional plain radiography, computed tomography and ultrasonography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010;39(2):72–8.20100917 10.1259/dmfr/68589458
77. Gou ZH Peng Y Yang K Sonographic and CT imaging features of intestinal perforation from a pill and packing: a case report Medicine (Baltimore) 2018 97 16 e0427 10.1097/MD.0000000000010427 29668604
Gou ZH, Peng Y, Yang K. Sonographic and CT imaging features of intestinal perforation from a pill and packing: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(16):e0427.29668604 10.1097/MD.0000000000010427
78. Ando A Hatori M Hagiwara Y Isefuku S Itoi E Imaging features of foreign body granuloma in the lower extremities mimicking a soft tissue neoplasm Ups J Med Sci 2009 114 1 46 51 10.1080/03009730802602455 19242872
Ando A, Hatori M, Hagiwara Y, Isefuku S, Itoi E. Imaging features of foreign body granuloma in the lower extremities mimicking a soft tissue neoplasm. Ups J Med Sci. 2009;114(1):46–51.19242872 10.1080/03009730802602455
79. Bodne D Quinn SF Cochran CF Imaging foreign glass and wooden bodies of the extremities with CT and MR J Comput Assist Tomogr 1988 12 4 608 611 10.1097/00004728-198807000-00013 3392261
Bodne D, Quinn SF, Cochran CF. Imaging foreign glass and wooden bodies of the extremities with CT and MR. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1988;12(4):608–11.3392261 10.1097/00004728-198807000-00013
80. Johnson PW Collins MS Wenger DE Diagnostic utility of T1-weighted MRI characteristics in evaluation of osteomyelitis of the foot AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009 192 1 96 100 10.2214/AJR.08.1376 19098186
Johnson PW, Collins MS, Wenger DE. Diagnostic utility of T1-weighted MRI characteristics in evaluation of osteomyelitis of the foot. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192(1):96–100.19098186 10.2214/AJR.08.1376
81. Lee KH Choi ST Lee SK Lee JH Yoon BY Application of a novel diagnostic rule in the differential diagnosis between acute gouty arthritis and septic arthritis J Korean Med Sci 2015 30 6 700 704 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.6.700 26028920
Lee KH, Choi ST, Lee SK, Lee JH, Yoon BY. Application of a novel diagnostic rule in the differential diagnosis between acute gouty arthritis and septic arthritis. J Korean Med Sci. 2015;30(6):700–4.26028920 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.6.700
82 Morrison WB Ledermann HP Schweitzer ME MR imaging of inflammatory conditions of the ankle and foot Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2001 9 3 615 637 10.1016/S1064-9689(21)00541-9 11694430
Morrison WB, Ledermann HP, Schweitzer ME. MR imaging of inflammatory conditions of the ankle and foot. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2001;9(3):615–37 (xi-xii).11694430 10.1016/S1064-9689(21)00541-9
83. Yu Z Mao T Xu Y Diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy CT in gout: a systematic review and meta-analysis Skeletal Radiol 2018 47 12 1587 1593 10.1007/s00256-018-2948-y 29725712
Yu Z, Mao T, Xu Y, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy CT in gout: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Skeletal Radiol. 2018;47(12):1587–93.29725712 10.1007/s00256-018-2948-y
84. Fritz J Henes JC Fuld MK Fishman EK Horger MS Dual-energy computed tomography of the knee, ankle, and foot: noninvasive diagnosis of gout and quantification of monosodium urate in tendons and ligaments Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2016 20 1 130 136 10.1055/s-0036-1579709 27077593
Fritz J, Henes JC, Fuld MK, Fishman EK, Horger MS. Dual-energy computed tomography of the knee, ankle, and foot: noninvasive diagnosis of gout and quantification of monosodium urate in tendons and ligaments. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2016;20(1):130–6.27077593 10.1055/s-0036-1579709
85. Suresh E Diagnosis and management of gout: a rational approach Postgrad Med J 2005 81 959 572 579 10.1136/pgmj.2004.030692 16143687
Suresh E. Diagnosis and management of gout: a rational approach. Postgrad Med J. 2005;81(959):572–9.16143687 10.1136/pgmj.2004.030692
86. Rousseau I Cardinal EE Raymond-Tremblay D Beauregard CG Braunstein EM Saint-Pierre A Gout: radiographic findings mimicking infection Skeletal Radiol 2001 30 10 565 569 10.1007/s002560100392 11685479
Rousseau I, Cardinal EE, Raymond-Tremblay D, Beauregard CG, Braunstein EM, Saint-Pierre A. Gout: radiographic findings mimicking infection. Skeletal Radiol. 2001;30(10):565–9.11685479 10.1007/s002560100392
87. Shiraishi M Fukuda T Igarashi T Tokashiki T Kayama R Ojiri H Differentiating rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis of the hand: multimodality imaging characteristics Radiographics 2020 40 5 1339 1354 10.1148/rg.2020200029 32735474
Shiraishi M, Fukuda T, Igarashi T, Tokashiki T, Kayama R, Ojiri H. Differentiating rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis of the hand: multimodality imaging characteristics. Radiographics. 2020;40(5):1339–54.32735474 10.1148/rg.2020200029
88. Crespo-Rodriguez AM Sanz Sanz J Freites D Rosales Z Abasolo L Arrazola J Role of diagnostic imaging in psoriatic arthritis: how, when, and why Insights Imaging 2021 12 1 121 10.1186/s13244-021-01035-0 34432145
Crespo-Rodriguez AM, Sanz Sanz J, Freites D, Rosales Z, Abasolo L, Arrazola J. Role of diagnostic imaging in psoriatic arthritis: how, when, and why. Insights Imaging. 2021;12(1):121.34432145 10.1186/s13244-021-01035-0
89. Dupuy A Benchikhi H Roujeau JC Risk factors for erysipelas of the leg (cellulitis): case-control study BMJ 1999 318 7198 1591 1594 10.1136/bmj.318.7198.1591 10364117
Dupuy A, Benchikhi H, Roujeau JC, et al. Risk factors for erysipelas of the leg (cellulitis): case-control study. BMJ. 1999;318(7198):1591–4.10364117 10.1136/bmj.318.7198.1591
90. Greene AK Goss JA Diagnosis and staging of lymphedema Semin Plast Surg 2018 32 1 12 16 10.1055/s-0038-1635117 29636648
Greene AK, Goss JA. Diagnosis and staging of lymphedema. Semin Plast Surg. 2018;32(1):12–6.29636648 10.1055/s-0038-1635117
91. Suehiro K Morikage N Murakami M Yamashita O Samura M Hamano K Significance of ultrasound examination of skin and subcutaneous tissue in secondary lower extremity lymphedema Ann Vasc Dis 2013 6 2 180 188 10.3400/avd.oa.12.00102 23825499
Suehiro K, Morikage N, Murakami M, Yamashita O, Samura M, Hamano K. Significance of ultrasound examination of skin and subcutaneous tissue in secondary lower extremity lymphedema. Ann Vasc Dis. 2013;6(2):180–8.23825499 10.3400/avd.oa.12.00102
92. Neligan PC Kung TA Maki JH MR lymphangiography in the treatment of lymphedema J Surg Oncol 2017 115 1 18 22 10.1002/jso.24337 27377990
Neligan PC, Kung TA, Maki JH. MR lymphangiography in the treatment of lymphedema. J Surg Oncol. 2017;115(1):18–22.27377990 10.1002/jso.24337
93. De Coninck T Vanhoenacker F Verstraete K Imaging features of Morel-Lavallee lesions J Belg Soc Radiol 2017 101 Suppl 2 15 10.5334/jbr-btr.1401 30498807
De Coninck T, Vanhoenacker F, Verstraete K. Imaging features of Morel-Lavallee lesions. J Belg Soc Radiol. 2017;101(Suppl 2):15.30498807 10.5334/jbr-btr.1401
94 Dawre S Lamba S H S Gupta S Gupta AK The Morel-Lavallee lesion: a review and proposed algorithmic approach Eur J Plast Surg 2012 35 489 494 10.1007/s00238-012-0725-z
Dawre S, Lamba S, H S, Gupta S, Gupta AK. The Morel-Lavallee lesion: a review and proposed algorithmic approach. Eur J Plast Surg. 2012;35:489–94.10.1007/s00238-012-0725-z
95. Parra JA Fernandez MA Encinas B Rico M Morel-Lavallee effusions in the thigh Skeletal Radiol 1997 26 4 239 241 10.1007/s002560050228 9151373
Parra JA, Fernandez MA, Encinas B, Rico M. Morel-Lavallee effusions in the thigh. Skeletal Radiol. 1997;26(4):239–41.9151373 10.1007/s002560050228
96. Shen C Peng JP Chen XD Efficacy of treatment in peri-pelvic Morel-Lavallee lesion: a systematic review of the literature Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2013 133 5 635 640 10.1007/s00402-013-1703-z 23443527
Shen C, Peng JP, Chen XD. Efficacy of treatment in peri-pelvic Morel-Lavallee lesion: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013;133(5):635–40.23443527 10.1007/s00402-013-1703-z
97 Mellado JM Perez del Palomar L Diaz L Ramos A Sauri A Long-standing Morel-Lavallee lesions of the trochanteric region and proximal thigh: MRI features in five patients AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004 182 5 1289 1294 10.2214/ajr.182.5.1821289 15100134
Mellado JM, Perez del Palomar L, Diaz L, Ramos A, Sauri A. Long-standing Morel-Lavallee lesions of the trochanteric region and proximal thigh: MRI features in five patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182(5):1289–94.15100134 10.2214/ajr.182.5.1821289
98. Medverd JR Ngo AV Bhargava P An unusual cause of persistent subcutaneous fluid collection Br J Radiol 2011 84 1005 864 866 10.1259/bjr/29764457 21849371
Medverd JR, Ngo AV, Bhargava P. An unusual cause of persistent subcutaneous fluid collection. Br J Radiol. 2011;84(1005):864–6.21849371 10.1259/bjr/29764457
99. Bonilla-Yoon I Masih S Patel DB The Morel-Lavallee lesion: pathophysiology, clinical presentation, imaging features, and treatment options Emerg Radiol 2014 21 1 35 43 10.1007/s10140-013-1151-7 23949106
Bonilla-Yoon I, Masih S, Patel DB, et al. The Morel-Lavallee lesion: pathophysiology, clinical presentation, imaging features, and treatment options. Emerg Radiol. 2014;21(1):35–43.23949106 10.1007/s10140-013-1151-7
