
==== Front
Front Public Health
Front Public Health
Front. Public Health
Frontiers in Public Health
2296-2565
Frontiers Media S.A.

10.3389/fpubh.2024.1409105
Public Health
Original Research
Factors associated with diet quality of adolescents in Saudi Arabia
Mumena Walaa Abdullah 1 2 *

1Clinical Nutrition Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taibah University, Madinah, Saudi Arabia
2Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Edited by: Haleama Al Sabbah, Abu Dhabi University, United Arab Emirates

Reviewed by: Nurul ‘Ain Azizan, University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus, Malaysia

Aureliusz Kosendiak, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland

*Correspondence: Walaa Abdullah Mumena, wmumena@taibahu.edu.sa
21 8 2024
2024
12 140910529 3 2024
12 8 2024
Copyright © 2024 Mumena.
2024
Mumena
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Introduction

Research exploring factors that may influence the diet quality of adolescents in the Middle East are very limited. We aimed to investigate factors associated with diet quality and the weight status of adolescents in Saudi Arabia.

Methods

A cross-sectional study that included 638 healthy adolescents aged between 11 and 18 years who were randomly recruited from 16 private and public middle- and high-schools located in two Saudi cities (Jeddah and Madinah). All participants were given an envelope for parents to collect socioeconomic data. Diet quality and anthropometric data of adolescents were evaluated at school.

Results

Median diet quality score was higher among males compared to female adolescents (10.00 (8.00–11.00) vs. 9.00 (8.00–10.0), respectively, p = 0.018). Median diet quality score was significantly higher among adolescents residing in Jeddah compared to adolescents residing in Madinah (10.00 (9.00–11.0) vs. 9.00 (8.00–10.0), respectively, p = 0.002). Stepwise linear regression analysis indicated that city of residence (B = −0.53, SE = 0.16 [95% CI: −0.83 to −0.22]), and child’s sex (B = −0.34, SE = 0.15 [95% CI: −0.64 to −0.05]) were associated with diet quality scores of adolescents in Saudi Arabia.

Discussion

Future longitudinal research should be directed to further investigate other possible factors influencing the diet quality of adolescents and individuals from other age groups in Saudi Arabia.

diet quality
factors
associations
adolescents
Saudi Arabia
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. section-at-acceptancePublic Health and Nutrition
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Diet quality is an indicator of the variety of the key food groups relative to the dietary guideline recommendations. It involves the assessment of not only the variety of food but also the quality of the diet. Diet quality allows the examination of the epidemiological associations between foods and health (1–3). Diet quality is found to be inversely associated with the risk of several health outcomes in children, adolescents, and adults (1, 3). For example, diet quality has been linked to weight status, metabolic syndrome, blood pressure, cognitive performance, and quality of life (3).

Different methods have been used to assess the diet quality of individuals, each of which use different scoring system that represent both quality and variety of diets. Indicators mainly fall within one of the three categories: (1) Food/food group indicators; (2) Nutrient-base indicators; (3) Combined indices (2, 3). The use of scoring system that consider both food group and nutrient indicators has become more popular. Recently, the Short-Form Food Frequency Questionnaire (SFFFQ) has been used repeatedly used among healthy and ill individuals (4–6).

Several factors may influence the diet quality of young individuals. Gender inequality has been shown to have an impact on various nutrition-related aspects (7, 8). Socioeconomic factors, including maternal education, occupation, and income, have been also found to influence the diet quality of adolescents (9, 10). Data obtained from a large study conducted among children and caregivers in Ireland suggest that household socioeconomic factors (e.g., maternal education level, household social class, household income) are important factors that can be associated with the dietary quality of children (11). Educated mothers are more likely to have healthy food options at home (e.g., fruits and vegetables) (12). Additionally, it was found that the children of full-time working mothers had more unhealthy eating behaviors and food choices (13, 14). Family income is also a crucial factor that may affect the diet quality of young individuals, as it reflects the availability and accessibility of nutritious food (12, 15, 16).

Negative dietary behaviors such as skipping meals and fast-food consumption are linked to lower diet quality (17–21). In addition, data among young adults in Saudi Arabia have shown low consumption of fruits, vegetables, nuts, and fish, while high consumption of processed foods and sugar-sweetened beverages have been reported (22). These unhealthy dietary behaviors are common among adolescents in Saudi Arabia and in other populations (17, 18, 23–25). However, limited research has investigated factors associated with diet quality and the weight status of adolescents in Saudi Arabia. Thus, this study aimed to explore factors associated with diet quality of adolescents in Saudi Arabia. Such data are needed to plan effective interventions that target improving the diet quality of adolescents in Saudi Arabia and in other similar settings in the Middle East.

Materials and methods

Study population and sampling

For this cross-sectional study, adolescents aged between 11 and 18 years were recruited from 16 schools located in two major cities in the Western region of Saudi Arabia, Jeddah and Madinah. Schools were chosen at random from different areas in both cities (North, South, East, West) which includes middle and high schools, boys’ and girls’ schools, private and public schools, and schools located at relatively wealthy neighborhoods and schools from lower income communities. Exclusion criteria include chronic diseases, allergies, diet restrictions, and use of medications that may affect weight status. The minimum sample size needed for this was estimated to be 235 adolescents based on beta = 0.10, alpha = 0.05 (two sided), mean dietary quality score of 11.4, a detectable difference of 4% in mean value between male and female adolescents, and a standard deviation of 1.6 (4, 26). Ethical certificate for this study was granted from the ethical review board in the College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taibah University (2021/104/201 CLN). Signed consent form was obtained from caregivers of all adolescences before collecting the data.

Data collection

One hundred twenty-five envelopes were distributed by a trained data collection team members to students in each school with a total of 2,000 envelopes (Figure 1). Each envelope included a consent form to be signed by the student’s mother in addition to a questionnaire to collect data on sociodemographic/socioeconomic status and height and weight of mothers. Mothers’ body mass index (BMI) was later calculated and categorized based on the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria (underweight, healthy weight, overweight, and obesity) (27). The envelopes were distributed to students between October and November 2021 in random classes in each school and data collection team members collected all returned envelopes within a maximum of 1 week from the date of distribution. Dietary data and anthropometrics of adolescents were then collected at school from each student.

Figure 1 Flowchart of study sample.

Assessment of diet quality

Diet quality was evaluated using the SFFFQ, which is a modified version of the original tool that was developed by Cleghorn et al. (4). Two nutritionists with expertise in dietary assessment validated items included in the SFFFQ to ensure the inclusion of all items consumed by adolescents in Saudi Arabia. A hard copy of the SFFFQ was filled out by each student during the school day; Instructions concerning the frequency of consumption and serving size were delivered by trained data collection personnel. The SFFFQ includes 20 food items as follows: (1) “Fruits (tinned/fresh/frozen)”; (2) “Fruit juices (not including syrup), fruit drink (e.g., Vimto) or powder juice (e.g., Tang)”; (3) “Salad (not including garnish added to sandwiches)”; (4) “Cooked vegetables (not including potatoes)”; (5) “Fried potatoes/chips”; (6) “Beans or legumes (baked beans, chickpeas, lentils)”; (7) “Fiber-rich breakfast cereal (e.g., Fit-ness)”; (8) “Whole wheat bread (all kinds including rusks)”; (9) “Cheese/yogurt”; (10) “Crisps/savory snacks”; (11) “Sweet biscuits, cookies, cakes, chocolates, and sweets)”; (12) “Ice cream/cream (cooking cream or whipped cream or cream)”; (13) “Soft drinks/pop/iced tea/energy drinks/beer (not sugar free or diet/light)”; (14) “Beef or lamb (steak, mince, cube)”; (15) “Chicken or turkey (steak, mince, cube) does not include those in batter or with added breadcrumbs”; (16) “Processed meats/meat product (sausage, bacon, meat samosa, corned beef, meat pies/pastries, meat burgers)”; (17) “Processed chicken/turkey (chicken nuggets/burgers, chicken pies in batter or bread-crumbs)”; (18) “White fish in batter or breadcrumbs (fish fingers and fried fish)”; (19) “White fish (does not include fish in batter or breadcrumbs)”; (20) “Oily fish (salmon, sardines, fresh tuna-not tinned tuna.” The frequency of consumption for items 1–13 were: “rarely or never” (coded as 0); “less than once a week” (coded as 1); “once a week” (coded as 2); “2–3 times a week” (coded as 3); “4–6 times a week” (coded as 4); “1–2 times a day” (coded as 5); “3–4 times a day” (coded as 6); “≥ 5 a day” (coded as 7). For items 14–20, the frequencies of consumption were: “rarely or never” (coded as 0); “less than once a week” (coded as 1); “once a week” (coded as 2); “2–3 times a week” (coded as 3); “4–6 times a week” (coded as 4); “≥7 times a week” (coded as 5). The excel sheet provided by Nutritools (https://www.nutritools.org) was used to calculate the total score of diet quality which ranges between 5 and 15.

Assessment of anthropometrics

After each student handed in the completed SFFFQ, students were directed to move to the anthropometric data collection station. The data collection personnel measured the height and weight of all students following a standardized procedure (28). Height was measured in centimeters by a measuring tape that was assembled on a flat wall. Students were requested to take off their shoes and look straight forward to assess their height and recoded the number after rounding it to the nearest 0.5 centimeter. An electronic scale (OMRON BF508, Japan) was used to assess weight of students in kilograms, and the measurement was rounded to the nearest 0.1 kilogram. Measurements of height and weight were collected twice and average for each student was calculated using Excel. Third measurement was collected if the height and weight recorded in the first two times have difference of more than 0.5 centimeter and 0.01 kilogram. Height, weight, and date of birth were used to determine the weight status of students using body mass index percentile according to the criteria of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (29).

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS 20, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Data of categorical variables are presented as frequency (percentage), while data of continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation and median (interquartile range). Normality of the diet quality score distribution was evaluated using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Mann–Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis H test were used to compare the median of diet quality score across the different groups. Pairwise comparison was performed to explore the significance across the different income groups. Bonferroni adjustments were used to correct for multiple testing in the bivariate analysis. Stepwise regression analysis was performed to explore factors (independent variables) associated with diet quality score (dependent variable) among the study participants. All tests were two-tailed with alpha = 0.05.

Results

Sample characteristics

A total of 741 envelopes were returned. Data of 638 adolescents were included in this study after excluding 6.48% (n = 48) of the adolescents due to missing dietary or anthropometric data, 4.59% (n = 34) for food allergy, 2.16% (n = 16) for chronic diseases, 0.40% (n = 3) of the adolescents were excluded as they were on a diet regimen, and 0.27% (n = 2) of the adolescents were excluded as they were older than 18 years. Fifty-three percent (n = 339) of adolescents aged between 15 and 18 years and 52.8% of the adolescents were female (n = 337). Most of the adolescents were Saudis (82.4%, n = 526), and 64.6% of participants (n = 412) were from Madinah. Fifty-six percent (n = 359) of adolescents were enrolled in public schools, while 46.1% (n = 294) of adolescents were the middle children. The prevalence of underweight (<5th percentile) among adolescents included in the study was 9.25% (n = 59), whereas the prevalence of overweight and obesity (≥85% percentile) was 36.5% (n = 233). About half of the mothers included in this study aged 41–50 years (44.7%, n = 285), and 91.2% (n = 582) were married. Over half of the mothers (53.4%, n = 310) were experiencing overweight or obesity (≥25 km/m2), and 61.0% (n = 389) reported holding a Bachelor or Postgraduate degree. Over two-thirds of the mothers (34.6%, n = 221) were employed of which 55.2% (n = 122) mothers were working 7–8 h per day. Twenty-two percent of the mothers (n = 140) reported family monthly income of < SR 6,000 (see Table 1).

Table 1 Characteristics of the study sample (n = 638).

	n	%	
Adolescents	
School level	
Middle school	318	49.8	
High-school	320	50.2	
Age group	
11–14 years	299	46.9	
15–18 years	339	53.1	
Sex	
Males	301	47.2	
Females	337	52.8	
Nationality	
Saudi	526	82.4	
Non-Saudi	112	17.6	
City of residence	
Madinah	412	64.6	
Jeddah	226	35.4	
School type	
Private	279	43.7	
Public	359	56.3	
Order of child among siblings	
Older child	177	27.7	
Middle child	294	46.1	
Youngest child	154	24.1	
Only child	13	2.04	
Weight status	
Underweight (<5th percentile)	59	9.25	
Healthy weight (5th to <85th percentile)	346	54.2	
Overweight (85th to <95th percentile)	102	16.0	
Obesity (≥95th percentile)	131	20.5	
Mothers	
Age group	
19–40 years	278	43.6	
41–50 years	285	44.7	
>50 years	75	11.8	
Marital status	
Married	582	91.2	
Separated	38	5.96	
Widow	18	2.82	
Weight status1	
Underweight (<18.5 km/m2)	16	2.76	
Healthy weight (18.5–24.9 km/m2)	254	43.8	
Overweight (25.0–29.9 km/m2)	192	33.1	
Obesity (≥30 km/m2)	118	20.3	
Education level	
≤High school/Diploma	249	39.0	
Bachelor degree	324	50.8	
Postgraduate degree	65	10.2	
Employment status	
Unemployed//Retired	417	65.4	
Employed	221	34.6	
Working hours per day	
<4 h	5	0.78	
4–6 h	72	11.3	
7–8 h	122	19.1	
>8 h	22	3.45	
N/A	417	65.4	
Family monthly income in SR2	
<SR 6,000	140	21.9	
SR 6,000–10,999	154	24.1	
SR 11,000–15,999	120	18.8	
SR 16,000–20,999	110	17.2	
≥SR 21,000	114	17.9	
1 Data concerning weight status for mother were provided by 580 mothers.

2 SR: Saudi Riyal ($1 = SR 3.75).

Association between diet quality and characteristics of adolescents

Diet quality score reported among the study sample ranged between 5 and 14. Median diet quality score was significantly higher among the adolescents residing in Jeddah compared to the adolescents residing in Madinah (10.00 (9.00–11.0) vs. 9.00 (8.00–10.0), respectively, p = 0.002). Additionally, median diet quality score was significantly higher among male compared to female adolescents (10.00 (8.00–11.00) vs. 9.00 (8.00–10.0), respectively, p = 0.018). Diet quality score was significantly linked to family monthly income but results of the pairwise comparison indicated no differences in median diet quality score across the different family income groups after Bonferroni adjustment (p > 0.005 for all tests). The median diet quality score was similar among all other characteristics of adolescents and their mothers included in this study (see Table 2).

Table 2 Median diet quality score across the different groups (n = 638).

	Mean ± SD	Median (IQR)	p-value	
Adolescents	
School level	
Middle school	9.18 ± 1.78	9.00 (8.00–10.0)	0.201	
High-school	9.33 ± 1.68	9.00 (9.00–10.0)	
Age group	
11–14 years	9.17 ± 1.76	9.00 (8.00–10.0)	0.116	
15–18 years	9.33 ± 1.70	9.00 (9.00–11.0)	
Sex	
Males	9.43 ± 1.73	10.00 (8.00–11.00)	0.018 1	
Females	9.10 ± 1.71	9.00 (8.00–10.0)	
Nationality	
Saudi	9.21 ± 1.76	9.00 (8.00–10.0)	0.235	
Non-Saudi	9.46 ± 1.54	9.50 (9.00–10.0)	
City of residence	
Madinah	9.08 ± 1.75	9.00 (8.00–10.0)	0.002 1	
Jeddah	9.56 ± 1.65	10.00 (9.00–11.0)	
School type	
Private	9.29 ± 1.77	9.00 (8.00–11.0)	0.795	
Public	9.23 ± 1.70	9.00 (8.00–10.0)	
Order of child among siblings	
Older child	9.45 ± 1.80	10.00 (8.00–11.0)	0.370	
Middle child	9.13 ± 1.78	9.00 (8.00–10.0)	
Youngest child	9.27 ± 1.55	9.00 (8.00–10.0)	
Only child	9.23 ± 1.48	10.00 (7.50–10.0)	
Weight status	
Underweight (<5th percentile)	9.05 ± 1.80	9.00 (8.00–10.0)	0.546	
Healthy weight (5th to <85th percentile)	9.21 ± 1.73	9.00 (8.00–10.0)	
Overweight (85th to <95th percentile)	9.35 ± 1.82	9.50 (8.00–11.0)	
Obesity (≥95th percentile)	9.38 ± 1.63	9.00 (9.00–10.0)	
Mothers	
Age group	
19–40 years	9.22 ± 1.81	9.00 (8.00–11.0)	0.888	
41–50 years	9.26 ± 1.70	9.00 (8.00–10.0)	
>50 years	9.33 ± 1.53	9.00 (9.00–11.0)	
Marital status	
Married	9.23 ± 1.72	9.00 (8.00–10.0)	0.286	
Separated	9.58 ± 1.70	10.00 (9.00–10.25)	
Widow	9.44 ± 1.98	10.00 (9.00–11.0)	
Weight status2	
Underweight (BMI <18.5 kg/m2)	9.38 ± 1.67	9.00 (8.25–10.0)	0.800	
Healthy weight (BMI 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2)	9.26 ± 1.77	9.00 (8.00–10.25)	
Overweight (BMI 25.0 to 29.9 kg/m2)	9.13 ± 1.83	9.00 (8.00–10.00)	
Obesity (≥30.0 kg/m2)	9.34 ± 1.58	9.00 (9.00–10.0)	
Education level	
≤High school/Diploma	9.22 ± 1.77	9.00 (8.00–10.0)	0.051	
Bachelor’s degree	9.18 ± 1.72	9.00 (8.00–10.0)	
Postgraduate degree	9.74 ± 1.59	10.00 (9.00–11.0)	
Employment status	
Unemployed/Retired	9.27 ± 1.71	9.00 (8.00–10.0)	0.611	
Employed	9.22 ± 1.76	9.00 (8.00–10.0)	
Working hours per day	
<4 h	9.00 ± 1.00	9.00 (8.00–10.0)	0.797	
4–6 h	9.25 ± 1.79	9.00 (8.00–10.0)	
7–8 h	9.16 ± 1.76	9.00 (8.00–10.0)	
>8 h	9.55 ± 1.68	10.00 (9.00–11.0)	
N/A	9.27 ± 1.72	9.00 (8.00–10.0)	
Family monthly income in SR3	
<SR 6,000	9.41 ± 1.56	10.00 (9.00–10.0)	0.0251	
SR 6,000–10,999	9.01 ± 1.71	9.00 (8.00–10.0)	
SR 11,000–15,999	9.03 ± 1.65	9.00 (8.00–10.0)	
SR 16,000–20,999	9.29 ± 1.93	10.00 (8.00–11.0)	
≥SR 21,000	9.58 ± 1.78	10.00 (9.00–11.0)	
1 Alpha = 0.05.

2 Data concerning weight status for mothers were provided by 582 participants.

3 SR: Saudi Riyal ($1 = SR 3.75).

Stepwise linear regression analysis indicated that sex city of residence (B = −0.53, SE = 0.16 [95% CI: −0.83 to −0.22], p = 0.001), and child’s sex (B = −0.34, SE = 0.15 [95% CI: −0.64 to −0.05], p = 0.023) were associated with diet quality scores of adolescents in Saudi Arabia. School level, age group, nationality, school type, order of child among siblings, weight status of adolescents as well as age group of mothers, marital status of mothers, weight status of mothers, education level of mothers, employment status of mothers, working hours per day, and family monthly income were not associated with the diet quality of adolescents (see Table 3).

Table 3 Stepwise regression analysis of association between diet quality and characteristics of the study sample (n = 638).

Variables	Beta	Standard error	95% confidence interval	p-value	R-square	
Model 1	
City of residence	−0.58	0.16	−0.89 to −0.28	<0.0011	0.03	
Model 2	
City of residence	−0.53	0.16	−0.83 to −0.22	0.0011	0.04	
Child’s sex	−0.34	0.15	−0.64 to −0.05	0.0231		
1Alpha = 0.05.

Discussion

This study aimed to investigate factors associated with diet quality of adolescents in Saudi Arabia. Bivariate analysis shows that median diet quality score was higher among males compared to female adolescents. Additionally, median diet quality score was significantly higher among adolescents residing in Jeddah compared to adolescents residing in Madinah. Median diet quality score was similar across the different family income groups. Stepwise linear regression analysis indicated that city of residence and child’s sex were associated with diet quality scores of adolescents in Saudi Arabia.

We found that male adolescents have significantly higher diet quality scores compared to female adolescents. This finding was consistent with previous work conducted among Canadian and Brazilian adolescents (20, 30). However, other studies conducted among adolescents in the UK and Malaysia show significantly higher diet quality scores among female adolescents compared to males (31, 32). In fact, this variation in findings could be due to differences in food preference among the studied populations. Studies that reported better diet quality among males compared to female adolescents also reported higher intake of fats and lower intake of grain products, fruits and vegetables, milk products, and meats among female adolescents (20), while in Saudi Arabia higher intake of fruits was observed among males than female adolescents (33). Additionally, female adolescents are more likely to skip meals compared to male adolescents, where male adolescents reported regularity in the consumption of breakfast, lunch, and dinner compared to female adolescents (34). Data suggest a link between skipping meals and snacking behaviors, which are also found to be different between male and female adolescents (35). A study conducted in 2016 found a high correlation between adolescents and snacking while watch television. This study also found a positive association between snacking and energy intake, consumption of sugar-sweetened beverage, and frequent fast-food intake. Negative association was reported between snacking and fruit and vegetable consumption (36). In Saudi Arabia, female adolescents are more likely to stay home, which may lead to higher media use, lower dietary practices, and a lower diet quality compared to male adolescents.

Several factors related to the environment may influence the diet quality of individuals. In this study, the diet quality score was significantly higher among adolescents residing in Jeddah compared to adolescents residing in Madinah. Access to food retails, types, and prices of food offered in these outlets can affect food choices of adolescents (37). It is possible that individuals living in bigger cities, such as Jeddah, tend to consume more fruits, vegetables, and healthy food items as bigger cities have several large food retails in most, if not all, main neighborhoods that offer variety of fresh local and imported food products throughout the year, whereas individuals residing in relevantly smaller cities, like Madinah, may have limited access to these type of food retails. In addition, more job opportunities with higher income might be more available in larger cities compared to smaller cities. More research should be directed to explore association between diet quality and city of residence considering the number of food retails and type and prices of food offered.

It has been recognized that lower income households are purchasing less healthful food items, including fruits, vegetables, and dairy products, compared with higher income households (38, 39). Thus, young individuals living in lower income households tend to consume diets that are of lower quality (11, 40). However, our findings indicate similar median diet quality score across the different family income groups. Generally, the population of Saudi Arabia, including young adults, are consuming diets that are low in nutritious food items including nuts, fruits, vegetables, fish, and high quantitates of sugary drinks and processed meats, which indicate limited quality of diet (22). Inconsistent findings reported in this study can be explained by the low variation in diet quality among adolescents included in this study. Additionally, a number of factors can influence the quality of diet of low-income individuals including knowledge related coping strategies and availability of assistant programs for low-income families (39, 41–43). Several assistant programs are offered to low-income families and individuals in Saudi Arabia, including the financial support provided via the Human Resources Development Fund, citizen account, Ehsan, charities, and Food Preservation Societies (Hefz Al Nema) and many other formal and informal forms of support (41–43). These assistant programs could help in improving the quality of diet of low-income families. Improving the income of families with children is important; however, educating mothers on how to improve the diet quality of children and how to cope with food insecurity is more important to achieve optimal nutritional health on the long-term (44).

It is important to conduct interventions that focuses on improving the quality of diet from a young age in order to enhance the overall health status of individuals. A review published in 2023 reported differences in motivational factors influencing food habits among male and female adolescents. Female adolescents were found to be more externally motivated (e.g., change dietary habits to lose weight to fit traditional norms), whereas male adolescents were found to be more internally motivated (e.g., eat for enjoyment). Thus, using sex-specific motivation approaches to improve food habits of adolescents can result in more effective interventions (45). Despite the significantly higher diet quality score reported in male adolescents compared to female adolescents included in our study (10.00 vs. 9.00, respectively), the diet quality score is considered limited for both sexes (maximum diet quality score is 15), which indicates the need for tailored intervention that aims to improve the diet quality of adolescents in Saudi Arabia.

To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate factors associated with the diet quality among adolescents in Saudi Arabia and in the Middle East. In addition, recruitment in this study was performed randomly, which increases the generalizability of findings. However, the study is limited by its design, as causal relationship cannot be determined from cross-sectional studies. In addition, findings of this study might be limited to adolescents residing in main cities in the Western region of Saudi Arabia and results could be different in other regions in Saudi Arabia. The SFFFQ used was developed and validated among population of the UK; however, the modified version of the tool used in this study included local food items as examples of the 20 food items presented in the original tool. Additionally, the SFFFQ provides total score of diet quality and data concerning the score of each component of the diet is not available.

In conclusion, the diet quality of adolescents was found to be linked to city of residence and child’s sex. Nutrition education programs targeting female adolescents and adolescents residing in smaller cities are needed to improve the diet quality of adolescents. By better understanding how sex and setting affect the quality of diets, effective interventions can be designed to improve the diet quality of adolescents in Saudi Arabia specifically and more generally in the Middle East. Future longitudinal research should be directed to further investigate other possible factors influencing the diet quality of adolescents and individuals from other age groups in order to design effective interventions that aim to improve the quality of diets among the population of Saudi Arabia.

This work was conducted using the Short Form FFQ tool developed by Cleghorn as reported in https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980016001099 and listed in the Nutritools (www.nutritools.org) library. We thank Amal Alhejaili, Fai Al-Mutairi, Jenan Mahabbat, Seba Lamfoon, Shahad Al-mughathawi, Yara Sadeq, and Yousor Qarani for their collaboration during data collection.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by the ethical review board in the College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taibah University. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin.

Author contributions

WM: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1409105/full#supplementary-material
==== Refs
References

1. Wirt A Collins C . Diet quality – what is it and does it matter? Public Health Nutr. (2009) 12 :2473–92. doi: 10.1017/S136898000900531X 19335941
2. Gil Á de Victoria E Olza J . Indicators for the evaluation of diet quality. Nutr Hosp. (2015) 31 :128–44. doi: 10.3305/nh.2015.31.sup3.8761, PMID: 25719781
3. Dalwood P Marshall S Burrows T McIntosh A Collins C . Diet quality indices and their associations with health-related outcomes in children and adolescents: an updated systematic review. Nutr J. (2020) 19 :118. doi: 10.1186/s12937-020-00632-x, PMID: 33099309
4. Cleghorn C Harrison R Ransley J Wilkinson S Thomas J Cade J . Can a dietary quality score derived from a short-form ffq assess dietary quality in UK adult population surveys? Public Health Nutr. (2016) 19 :2915–23. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016001099, PMID: 27181696
5. Yang T Sahota P Pickett K Bryant M . Association of food security status with overweight and dietary intake: exploration of White British and Pakistani-origin families in the born in Bradford cohort. Nutr J. (2018) 17 :48. doi: 10.1186/s12937-018-0349-7, PMID: 29690871
6. Bredin C Naimimohasses S Norris S Wright C Hancock N Hart K . Development and relative validation of a short food frequency questionnaire for assessing dietary intakes of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients. Eur J Nutr. (2020) 59 :571–80. doi: 10.1007/s00394-019-01926-5, PMID: 30805696
7. Bärebring L Palmqvist M Winkvist A Augustin H . Gender differences in perceived food healthiness and food avoidance in a Swedish population-based survey: a cross sectional study. Nutr J. (2020) 19 :140. doi: 10.1186/s12937-020-00659-0, PMID: 33375947
8. Otsuka Y Kaneita Y Itani O Jike M Osaki Y Higuchi S . Gender differences in dietary behaviors among Japanese adolescents. Prev Med Rep. (2020) 20 :101203. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101203, PMID: 32995146
9. Béghin L Dauchet L De Vriendt T Cuenca-García M Manios Y Toti E . Influence of parental socio-economic status on diet quality of European adolescents: results from the HELENA study. Br J Nutr. (2014) 111 :1303–12. doi: 10.1017/S0007114513003796, PMID: 24330831
10. Wilcox S Sharpe P Liese A Dunn C Hutto B . Socioeconomic factors associated with diet quality and meeting dietary guidelines in disadvantaged neighborhoods in the Southeast United States. Ethn Health. (2020) 25 :1115–31. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2018.1493434, PMID: 29966432
11. Keane E Cullinan J Perry CP Kearney PM Harrington JM Perry IJ . Dietary quality in children and the role of the local food environment. SSM - Popul Heal. (2016) 2 :770–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.10.002, PMID: 29349188
12. MacFarlane A Crawford D Ball K Savige G Worsley A . Adolescent home food environments and socioeconomic position. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. (2007) 16 :748–56. PMID: 18042538
13. Datar A Nicosia N Shier V . Maternal work and children’s diet, activity, and obesity. Soc Sci Med. (2014) 107 :196–204. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.12.022, PMID: 24491828
14. Bauer K Hearst M Escoto K Berge J Neumark-Sztainer D . Parental employment and work-family stress: associations with family food environments. Soc Sci Med. (2012) 75 :496–504. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.03.026, PMID: 22591825
15. Lo Y-T Chang Y-H Drph M-S Wahlqvist M . Health and nutrition economics: diet costs are associated with diet quality. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. (2009) 18 :598–604. PMID: 19965354
16. Turrell G Hewitt B Patterson C Oldenburg B . Measuring socio-economic position in dietary research: is choice of socio-economic indicator important? Public Health Nutr. (2003) 6 :191–200. doi: 10.1079/PHN2002416, PMID: 12675962
17. Rodrigues P Luiz R Monteiro L Ferreira M Gonçalves-Silva R Pereira R . Adolescents’ unhealthy eating habits are associated with meal skipping. Nutrition. (2017) 42 :114–120.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2017.03.011 28596058
18. Rouhani M Mirseifinezhad M Omrani N Esmaillzadeh A Azadbakht L . Fast food consumption, quality of diet, and obesity among Isfahanian adolescent girls. J Obes. (2012) 2012 :597924:1–8. doi: 10.1155/2012/597924 22619703
19. French S Story M Neumark-Sztainer D Fulkerson J Hannan P . Fast food restaurant use among adolescents: associations with nutrient intake, food choices and behavioral and psychosocial variables. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. (2001) 25 :1823–33. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801820, PMID: 11781764
20. Storey K Forbes L Fraser S Spence J Plotnikoff R Raine K . Diet quality, nutrition and physical activity among adolescents: the web-SPAN (web-survey of physical activity and nutrition) project. Public Health Nutr. (2009) 12 :2009–17. doi: 10.1017/S1368980009990292, PMID: 19545471
21. Mumena WA Ateek AA Alamri RK Alobaid SA Alshallali SH Afifi SY . Fast-food consumption, dietary quality, and dietary intake of adolescents in Saudi Arabia. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2022) 19 :15083. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215083, PMID: 36429802
22. Moradi-Lakeh M El Bcheraoui C Afshin A Daoud F Almazroa MMA Al Saeedi M . Diet in Saudi Arabia: findings from a nationally representative survey. Public Health Nutr. (2017) 20 :1075–81. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016003141, PMID: 27974061
23. Benajiba N . Fast food intake among Saudi population: alarming fact. Am J Food Nutr. (2016) 6 :44–8.
24. Fryar C Carroll M Ahluwalia N Ogden C . Fast food intake among children and adolescents in the United States, 2015-2018. NCHS Data Brief. (2020) 375 :1–8. PMID: 33054908
25. Alasqah I Mahmud I East L Alqarawi N Usher K . Dietary behavior of adolescents in the Qassim region, Saudi Arabia: a comparison between cities with and without the healthy cities program. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2021) 18 :9508. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189508, PMID: 34574431
26. Hulley S Cummings S Browner W Grady D Newman T . Designing clinical research. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, a Wolters Kluwer business (2013). 367 p.
27. World Health Organization (2024). Body mass index - BMI [Internet]. Available at: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/topics/topic-details/GHO/body-mass-index (Accessed May 11, 2024).
28. World Health Organization. Training course on child growth assessment. Geneva: World Health Organization (2008).
29. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2022). Recommended BMI-for-age cutoffs [internet]. CDC. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/healthyweight/assessing/bmi/childrens_bmi/about_childrens_bmi.html#interpreted (Accessed May 11, 2024).
30. de Assumpção D Barros M Fisberg R Carandina L Goldbaum M Cesar C . Diet quality among adolescents: a population-based study in Campinas, Brazil. Rev Bras Epidemiol. (2012) 15 :605–16. doi: 10.1590/S1415-790X2012000300014, PMID: 23090307
31. Winpenny E Greenslade S Corder K van Sluijs E . Diet quality through adolescence and early adulthood: cross-sectional associations of the dietary approaches to stop hypertension diet index and component food groups with age. Nutrients. (2018) 10 :1585. doi: 10.3390/nu10111585, PMID: 30380598
32. Rezali F Chin Y Mohd Shariff Z Mohd Yusof B Sanker K Woon F . Evaluation of diet quality and its associated factors among adolescents in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Nutr Res Pract. (2015) 9 :511–6. doi: 10.4162/nrp.2015.9.5.511, PMID: 26425281
33. Al-Hazzaa HM Abahussain NA Al-Sobayel HI Qahwaji DM Musaiger AO . Physical activity, sedentary behaviors and dietary habits among Saudi adolescents relative to age, gender and region. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. (2011) 8 :140. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-140, PMID: 22188825
34. Adeel FF Awan MA Anjum N Ahmed H Ahmed Z Afreen A . Dietary practices among adolescents: do boys eat better than girls? Nurture. (2012) 6 :23–30. doi: 10.55951/nurture.v6i1.62
35. Larson NI Miller JM Watts AW Story MT Neumark-Sztainer DR . Adolescent snacking behaviors are associated with dietary intake and weight status. J Nutr. (2016) 146 :1348–55. doi: 10.3945/jn.116.230334, PMID: 27281807
36. Savige G Macfarlane A Ball K Worsley A Crawford D . Snacking behaviours of adolescents and their association with skipping meals. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. (2007) 4 :36. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-4-36, PMID: 17868479
37. Madlala SS Hill J Kunneke E Lopes T Faber M . Adult food choices in association with the local retail food environment and food access in resource-poor communities: a scoping review. BMC Public Health. (2023) 23 :1083. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15996-y, PMID: 37280606
38. French SA Tangney CC Crane MM Wang Y Appelhans BM . Nutrition quality of food purchases varies by household income: the SHoPPER study. BMC Public Health. (2019) 19 :231. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6546-2, PMID: 30808311
39. Mumena W Kutbi H . Household food security status, food purchasing, and nutritional health of Saudi girls aged 6-12 years. Prog Nutr. (2020) 22 :e2020082. doi: 10.23751/pn.v22i4.10424
40. Landry MJ van den Berg AE Asigbee FM Vandyousefi S Ghaddar R Davis JN . Child-report of food insecurity is associated with diet quality in children. Nutrients. (2019) 11 :1574. doi: 10.3390/nu11071574, PMID: 31336880
41. Human Resources and Social Development (2024). Human Resources Development Fund [Internet]. Available at: https://www.hrsd.gov.sa/en/ministry/about-ministry/minister-headed/entities-headed/hrdf (Accessed May 11, 2024).
42. Human Resources and Social Development (2024). Citizen Account [Internet]. Available at: https://www.hrsd.gov.sa/en/ministry-services/services/1154073 (Accessed May 11, 2024).
43. Ehsan (2024). Ehsan [Internet]. Available at: https://www.my.gov.sa/wps/portal/snp/servicesDirectory/servicedetails/s9155/!ut/p/z1/jZDRasIwFIafxYterufENi56lykIga4OUWtuRpWYFtqkpNnK3n5huypu6rk7h--D_z8goQBpys9al762pmzCfpSzd7FhKeFIckbIDN-Wc7Z6JSLBNcJhDOQJfQlA9pzz7Z4gUpCP-PjPcLznb5UBcQ8KLaYuW2YaZFf66qk2FwtFPyeUhgByrOdrkQad7KZU7BFTegVcd_wBbpQICXVjT78P5eaUsBDFqYtyysUfLpwr77t-EWGEwzDE2lrdqPhs2wj_UirbeyjGJHTtrhi-Eqw37YH1fPINy2WZ7A!!/ (Accessed May 11, 2024).
44. Deslippe AL Bergeron C Cohen TR . Boys and girls differ in their rationale behind eating: a systematic review of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations in dietary habits across countries. Front Nutr. (2023) 10 :1256189. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1256189, PMID: 37841404
45. Hanbazaza MA Mumena WA . Food security status, coping strategies, and health of women’s welfare society beneficiaries in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: a facility-based study. Ecol Food Nutr. (2022) 61 :43–55. doi: 10.1080/03670244.2021.1926244, PMID: 33993785
