
==== Front
F1000Res
F1000Res
F1000Research
2046-1402
F1000 Research Limited London, UK

10.12688/f1000research.149166.2
Research Article
Articles
Efficacy of different remineralization agents on microhardness and chemical composition of enamel white spot lesion
[version 2; peer review: 2 approved]

Ghanim Rahman Rafal Conceptualization Data Curation Formal Analysis Funding Acquisition Investigation Methodology Project Administration Resources Software Supervision Validation Visualization Writing – Original Draft Preparation Writing – Review & Editing https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3485-7015
a1
Diab Ban Sahib Supervision 2
1 preventive and pedodontics, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Baghdad Governorate, Iraq
2 Prof. Department of Preventive and Pedodontic Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq
a rafal.ghanem2202@codental.uobaghdad.edu.iq
No competing interests were disclosed.

3 9 2024
2024
13 5053 9 2024
Copyright: © 2024 Ghanim Rahman R and Diab BS
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Background

White spot lesions (WSLs) are frequently linked with low microhardness and mineral content changes. several strategies have been employed to deal with these problems. This investigation aimed to analyze the microhardness and mineral content changes after remineralization with bioactive glass (BAG) and casein phospho-peptide-amorphous calcium phosphate with fluoride (CPP-ACPF).

Methods

Twenty sound maxillary first premolars extracted were used to obtain a total of one hundred enamel samples. forty enamel slabs were split into four experimental groups (n = 10 each): Group I, BAG; Group II, BAG+CPP-ACPF; Group III, CPP-ACPF varnish; and Group IV, artificial saliva (negative control). To create artificial WSLs, all samples were preserved in a prepared demineralizing agent for 72 h before treatment with remineralizing agents. Vickers microhardness test was performed. Additionally, 60 enamel samples were selected for analysis using energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDX) and assigned to six experimental groups; the first four groups were similar to that used in the microhardness test along with Group V: WSLs, and Group VI: baseline. The statistical analyses employed in this study included Tukey’s HSD (p<0.05), one-way ANOVA, and Shapiro-Wilk.

Result

Regarding surface microhardness, the BAG+CPP-ACPF group showed the most favorable recovery, which was better than the outcomes of the BAG and CPP-ACPF groups. A statistically significant change (p <0.05) was not observed between them. Similarly, for mineral content change, the BAG+CPP-ACPF group demonstrated the greatest result, The BAG group came next, and the CPP-ACPF group came last.

Conclusion

The BAG+CPP-ACPF group might be regarded as the best course of treatment for enhancing both the surface microhardness and mineral content (Ca, P), while the control group (Artificial saliva) showed the least satisfactory results in comparison. After demineralization, mineral content and microhardness decreased in all samples. Therefore, BAG+CPP-ACPF significantly improved the surface microhardness and mineral content.

BAG
CPP-ACPF
Remineralization
white spot lesion.
The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.Revised Amendments from Version 1

The new version of this research states the null hypothesis and sample size calculation.
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

In dentistry, an early demineralization of enamel, either on the surface or slightly below it, is mentioned as a “white spot lesion” (WSL), This is dental caries’ first obvious sign. These lesions’ reversibility suggests that substantial dental procedures may not be necessary to restore the tooth structure. WSLs must be addressed right away, though, since their surfaces may become porous and lose their original gloss, which raises issues regarding their aesthetics and their development. 1 WSL is reversible in its early stages if remineralization mechanisms are initiated. 2 Up to 96% of orthodontic patients have WSLs owing to the difficulty in cleaning teeth when attachments are present, leading to food retention and plaque accumulation. 3 During subsurface demineralization, the enamel surface layer normally remains intact; nevertheless, if treatment is not received, it will eventually decompose into a real hollow. 4 Several conservative techniques were developed to treat WSLs. fluoride (F) is thought to be the primary factor influencing remineralization. Fluorides can be applied in dentistry practices in a variety of ways, including toothpaste, gels, rinses, and varnishes. Of all these types that are accessible, varnish yields the best effects. Fluoride varnish increases fluoride concentration on the tooth surface by acting as a reservoir for fluoride. Recently, the application of substances like casein phospho-peptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) has been explored as a substitute for fluoride for promoting remineralization. 5 CPPs are peptides formed from the casein milk protein. ACP is a form of calcium and phosphate, which is maintained by CPP. 6 , 7 It may release fluoride, phosphate, and calcium in response to acidogenic challenges, slows demineralization, and promotes remineralization. It attaches very easily to soft tissues, plaque, saliva pellicle, and even the hydroxyapatite portion of enamel. 8 One of the non-invasive techniques used to treat white spot lesions is preconditioning with air abrasion, which increases surface porosity and allows mineral ions to deposit into the lesion’s underlying body, improving the effectiveness of remineralizing agents by causing the lesion surface to become active. 9 Owing to its unique qualities like remineralization capacity, bioactive glass 45S5 (BAG) was manufactured. 10 , 11 WSLs were remineralized using gel and paste forms of BAG. 12 To promote WSL remineralization, the surface was prepared using air abrasion, and then the application of bioactive glass. However, this method is time-consuming. 13 BAG is a therapeutic powder made entirely of a bioactive glass called Novamin that reacts quickly on the surface to produce hydroxycarbonate apatite (HCA) in the presence of water. HCA and natural tooth minerals are chemically similar. 14 Once set by eating and brushing the teeth, the majority of fluoride varnishes put on the enamel surface are removed easily. Retention on the tooth surface is essential for materials that successfully encourage remineralization, precondition the teeth surface by air abrasion with BAG, and then apply varnish consisting of fluoride, calcium, and phosphate to increase the efficacy of remineralization. It is a novel approach aimed at assessing the alteration in enamel following preconditioning the surface with BAG + CPP-ACPF. The null hypotheses state that there was no difference in enamel microhardness and mineral content between the experimental and control groups While the alternative hypothesis states there was a difference in enamel microhardness and mineral content between the experimental and control groups. This study analyze the efficacy of BAG air abrasion preconditioning and CPP-ACPF varnish remineralization and contrast its effectiveness with BAG alone and CPP-ACPF varnish alone. Microhardness and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDX) were used for analysis.

Methods

Samples selection

This is an in-vitro study, twenty sound permanent maxillary first premolars were obtained from patients aged 12–20 years who underwent orthodontic treatment relying on a health research committee College of Dentistry University of Baghdad approved ethical protocol (Ref No. 724) dated 28/12/2022. The samples were cleaned with Tap water and polished using non-fluoridated slurry using prophylactic brushes attached to a slow-speed handpiece. The samples were then stored in a thymol solution (DR Thym™, InnuScience, Canada) of 0.1% (anti-microbial solution to restrict bacterial proliferation) for 1 week. Before use, it was kept in distilled water in a refrigerator at a temperature of 4 ± 0.1 °C until further use. 15

Preparation of enamel sample

Ten teeth were chosen for the study on EDX, and ten samples for the investigation on surface microhardness. Excluded from the study were teeth with cracks, stains, fluorosis, or developmental abnormalities (assessed using a light curing unit and a magnifying lens from (Fukai, China). The samples had comparable dimensions by measuring the mesiodistal (M-D) lengths using a digital Vernier (figure S3). Sections of the teeth were obtained to expose the lingual and buccal surfaces. 16

Estimation of Sample size by Utilizing G power 3.1.9.7 (via Franz-Faul, Universidad Kiel program, Germany) with the power of study 80%, alpha error of probability 0.05, the correlation between time points is 0.5 and the effect size of F is 0.25 with four groups and three-time points, with all these conditions, the sample size is 36 samples, thus 40 samples for microhardness were enough for this study while 60 samples for EDX analysis. Ten teeth were selected for the microhardness test, and four sections of enamel slabs were obtained from each tooth using a diamond disc bur for root removal and a large amount of water to prevent damage to the enamel. Enamel slabs were obtained using an XP precision sectioning saw (Pelco, USA). Their measurements were checked using a digital caliper (to get precise measurements (approximately 3 mm width × 3 mm length and 1.5 mm thick). 17 The samples were embedded in acrylic resin using a silicone mold that had the following dimensions: 0.5 cm × 1 cm × 1 cm. The resin was poured into the mold (Figure-S4A), and the enamel slab (Figure-S4B) was placed inside, with the outer enamel surface exposed (Figure S4). For “EDX” another ten premolar teeth were used to obtain the elemental composition of the enamel and ultrastructural information. Six sections of enamel slabs, three each from the buccal and palatal surfaces (3mm length × 1.5 mm thickness and 1.5 mm width), were obtained from each tooth placed in resin molds. The samples EDX were obtained without polishing to protect the microstructure. 18 Silicon carbide paper of 1200 grit was used for 10 s for polishing microhardness samples (Laryee Technology CO. LTD, China) under water cooling to obtain smooth and flat surfaces, followed by ultrasonic cleaning for 4 min to remove surface debris. 19

Sample grouping and study design

For the microhardness study:

Group I (BAG): In 10 sound enamel slabs with existing WSL, the surface is conditioned using BAG (Sylc ® powder) (Denfotex Research Ltd, Inverkeithing, UK).

Group II (BAG+CPP-ACPF): In 10 sound enamel slabs with existing WSL, the surface is conditioned using BAG and then using CPP-ACPF varnish (MI varnish-GC company- Japan).

Group III (CPP-ACPF): Ten sound enamel slabs with existing WSL were treated using CPP-ACPF varnish

Group IV (Artificial saliva): Ten sound enamel slabs with existing WSL were kept in the saliva without any intervention.

For EDX examination, sixty enamel slabs were used, and six groups were randomly assigned to receive each specimen from a single tooth:

“Groups I to IV were similar to the groups in the microhardness study; additionally, the following two groups were included.”

Group V (Baseline): Ten sound enamel slabs.

Group VI (WSLs): Ten sound enamel slabs with existing WSL, without further intervention.

Demineralization process

The samples were placed in a demineralized solution (Pioneer CO., Sulaymaniyah, Iraq) (acetic acid = 50 mM, NaCl = 100 mM, NaF = 1 ppm, NaN 3 = 5 mM, NaH 2PO 4–2H 2O = 10 mM, CaCl 2-2H 2O = 2.2 mM) to create an artificial white spot lesion. 1 M NaOH solution was used to adjust the pH to 4.5 r (SD Fujian, China) (Figure S5A, Figure S5B). 20 For four days, the demineralization process was conducted at 37 °C. Following a 30-second rinse in deionized water, the samples were also preserved in water that had been distilled.

Approach of remineralization

A. Air abrasion with BAG group

The BAG powder Sylc ® (Denfotex Research Ltd, Inverkeithing, UK) (Figure S2) which is a calcium sodium phosphor-silicate material with particle size ranging from (25 to 120 μm) was introduced to the reservoir according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. With the air stream encased in a deionized water barrier, performing air abrasion for 10 seconds with a circular movement using an Aqua Care Air Abrasion & Polishing System from VELOPEX International operating at an air pressure of 80 psi and a feed rate of 1 (Figure S6). The apparatus comprised a disposable plastic tip and a handpiece with a 0.8 mm diameter. Followed by washing with running water, which was stored in artificial saliva (20 mL per specimen) with a change of saliva every 24 hours for 14 days until final measurement. Artificial saliva (Pioneer CO., Sulaymaniyah, Iraq) contains (Potassium thiocyanate = 0.01; Sorbitol = 1, Potassium chloride = 1, Magnesium chloride = 0.05; Potassium phosphate = 0.04; Sodium carboxymethyl cellulose = 10, Sodium chloride = 1, Sodium fluoride = 0.0002,100 milliliters of boiling water and cooling, sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (985.5) mm of deionized water, was dissolved.

B. Air abrasion with BAG and CPP-ACPF group

After surface preconditioning with air abrasion as mentioned above, then applying CPP-ACPF varnish (MI varnish-GC company) to each sample (Figure S1), a single unit dosage packet has 1 mL of MI and 0.55 g/0.5 mL. There are 50 mg of NaF (22.6 mg F ion) in one varnish. it was allowed to air-dry for 20 seconds to ensure that it was set and became dry. To ensure that a consistent amount of fluoride varnish was applied to each specimen, a single-dose form was used. Subsequently, the slabs were maintained in saliva for 14 days, with a replacement of saliva every 24 hours.

C. CPP-ACPF group

After applying CPP-ACPF to each sample, it was allowed to air-dry for 20 s to ensure that it was set and became dry. To ensure that a consistent amount of fluoride varnish was applied to each specimen, a single-dose form was used. Subsequently, the slabs were maintained in saliva for 14 days, with a replacement of saliva every 24 hours.

D. Control group

Samples from this group were stored in saliva without any intervention.

Microhardness

Before the microhardness assessment, samples were kept in a moist environment. SMH was tested on each block surface. Vickers microhardness tester (Laryee, Model: HVS-1000, Beijing Time High Technology Ltd, China) was used to examine the hardness profile employing a 200-gf load and a pyramid-shaped indenter based on diamond squares for 15 s resulting in a diagonal shape on the surface (n=3 per sample) (Figure S7). The Vickers hardness numbers (VHN) were obtained for each sample after three marks were made at the middle, upper, and lower ends of the enamel surface while leaving a reasonably sound region in between. 21

The recovery of enamel surface microhardness (% SMH) was calculated by Cury et al. 22

100 (SMH post-treatment − SMH caries)/baseline SMH − SMH caries

Energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDX)

EDX (INSPECT F50, FEI Company, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) was used to determine the elemental compositions of the produced enamel samples (voltage: 20 kV; working distance: 10 mm; spatial resolution: 100 nm; count time: 60 s). 12 Three measurements were obtained for each sample and the mean values were calculated (Figure S8). The weight of calcium and phosphorus contents was calculated. EDX was obtained at the baseline group for intact enamel before demineralization and after demineralization (WSL group), and finally obtained after the remineralization period for each group. 23

Statistical analysis

Data description, analysis, and demonstration were performed using Statistical software for Social Science SPSS version 21.

Shapiro–Wilk test was used to determine whether the data were distributed normally. For group comparisons, repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was employed. To compare subgroups, Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD) test was used for post-hoc analysis. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05.

Results

Surface microhardness

Shapiro-Wilk test results for normality showed that surface Microhardness at (baseline, demineralization, and after remineralization) is normally distributed among groups as Table 1 indicates that there were no significant differences (p>0.05).

Table 1. Shapiro-Wilk Test for Normality test of Surface microhardness.

Phases	Groups	Shapiro-Wilk	
Statistic	Df	P value	
Baseline	BAG	0.908	10	0.266	
BAG+ CPP-ACPF	0.867	10	0.091	
CPP-ACPF	0.940	10	0.548	
Control	0.954	10	0.717	
Demineralization	BAG	0.853	10	0.054	
BAG + CPP-ACPF	0.952	10	0.693	
CPP-ACPF	0.916	10	0.323	
Control	0.943	10	0.586	
Remineralization	BAG	0.975	10	0.930	
BAG + CPP-ACPF	0.940	10	0.552	
CPP-ACPF	0.968	10	0.872	
Control	0.909	10	0.274	

The surface microhardness mean value decreased at baseline and demineralization phase for each group and subsequently, it increased significantly at the remineralization phase. The greatest increase (larger % of recovery) from the demineralization to remineralization phase was in the BAG+CPP-ACPF group, followed by the BAG group and then the CPP-ACPF group, respectively, with little difference between these two groups, while the lowest was in the control group, as shown in Table 2 and Figure 1.

Table 2. Descriptive and statistical test of surface microhardness in (kg/mm 2) at three time periods among groups.

Groups	Baseline	Demin.	Remin.	F	P value	% Recovery	
BAG	Min.	250.75	135.17	213.30	1623.205	0.000	68.128	
Max.	270.00	151.08	230.00	
Mean	260.250	141.108	222.200	
±SD	5.587	4.617	5.327	
BAG+ CPP-ACPF	Min.	248.50	137.67	225.25	2063.395	0.000	79.495	
Max.	271.00	148.80	248.80	
Mean	262.525	143.347	238.105	
±SD	7.199	3.994	8.089	
CPP-ACPF	Min.	257.13	131.00	210.00	1605.968	0.000	66.085	
Max.	272.25	147.00	231.00	
Mean	263.125	139.021	220.800	
±SD	5.243	5.582	6.763	
Control	Min.	253.50	132.08	130.67	1508.906	0.000	1.647	
Max.	271.63	148.00	145.83	
Mean	263.088	138.025	140.320	
±SD	4.706	5.136	5.029	
F	0.557	2.352	471.083				
P value	0.647	0.088	0.000				

Figure 1. Bar chart demonstrating the differences in microhardness among groups and stages.

ANOVA showed no significant differences in the surface microhardness values among all groups at the baseline and demineralization phases (P>0.05), although significant statistical differences were noted between the groups (P difference among the four groups in the remineralization phase).

Effect of phases in each group

Table 3 displays multiple pairwise comparisons of Microhardness by groupings across phases using the Tukey Honestly Significant Difference (Tukey HSD) test. Except for the control group (p>0.05), all groups had a greater mean difference in the remineralization phase as compared to the demineralization phase (p<0.05). All groups’ mean differences during the baseline phase, however, were greater than those at the remineralization phase (p<0.05).

Table 3. Tukey HSD test for Microhardness comparison between phases in each group.

GROUPS	Phases	Mean Difference	P value	
BAG	Baseline	Demin.	119.142	0.000	
Remin.	38.050	0.000	
Demin.	Remin.	-81.092	0.000	
BAG+ CPP-ACPF	Baseline	Demin.	119.178	0.000	
Remin.	24.420	0.000	
Demin.	Remin.	-94.758	0.000	
CPP-ACPF	Baseline	Demin.	124.104	0.000	
Remin.	42.325	0.000	
Demin.	Remin.	-81.779	0.000	
Control	Baseline	Demin.	125.063	0.000	
Remin.	122.768	0.000	
Demin.	Remin.	-2.295	0.944	
MD = mean difference.

EDX assessment among groups

The information from the EDX assessment for all groups about the weight percentages of phosphorous and calcium is shown in Figure 2. The weight percentage of both calcium and phosphorus decreased after demineralization. An increase in the weight percentage for Ca and P after remineralization in the BAG and CPP-ACPF groups compared with the WSL group, and the lowest was observed in the demineralization group (WSL), with significant differences among groups. The maximum values of Ca and P were recorded in the BAG+CPP-ACPF group. Minimal increase was noticed in the weight percentage of Ca, and P for groups treated using artificial saliva (the control group) as compared with the demineralization stage.

Figure 2. Bar graph showing Calcium and phosphorus content analysis of the enamel surface with EDX measurement.

Discussion

It is crucial to take the most suitable course of action to protect tooth enamel and increase dental caries resistance; however, this can be difficult because of the intricate structural and functional interactions. This study investigated enamel remineralization using BAG air abrasion and CPP-ACP, and its effect on mineral content and microhardness. Basic chemical models have been utilized to produce artificial lesions in most in vitro cariology investigations. 24 It offers clear benefits, such as easy research, time, controlled experimental conditions, and repeatability of the results. Because natural WSLs on enamel vary greatly in size, shape, and mineral content, natural WSL teeth were replaced using artificial WSLs in human premolars. 25 To create artificial enamel lesions for cariology research, these lesions should be considered acceptable. Changes in mechanical properties typically coincide with a shift in the chemical makeup of demineralized enamel. Surface microhardness measurement is regarded as an accurate and effective tool for assessing tooth surface modification following the de- and re-mineralization processes. 26 VHN obtained during the baseline microhardness measurements satisfied the typical enamel tissue VHN range of 248.5–272.25 which coincides with the results of Meredith et al. 27 Following demineralization, the microhardness of each group of enamel samples decreased from 131 to 151.08. Within the constraints of this research, the findings showed that hardness tended to rise and then regain in the BAG+CPP-ACPF group, followed by BAG then by CPP-ACPF alone with a significant difference.

The control group showed the smallest difference. The results indicated significantly higher microhardness in the BAG group than that in the CPP-ACPF group. This coincides with an earlier in vitro study by Alessa N, Shah SA et al. 28 that compared several remineralizing agents, and found that BAG is a more effective agent in treating initial caries. Furthermore, Mehta et al. 29 discovered that Novamin remineralized the carious lesion more successfully than CPP-ACP, which may have been due to the bioactivity of BAG in the formation of hydroxycarbonate apatite (HCA) layer from its reactions with tissue fluids. Bioglasses that come in contact with bodily fluids cause diverse hydrated silicate species, as well as Phosphate, calcium, and sodium, to dissolve and leach quickly from the glass surface. A poly-condensed silica-rich gel layer was developed on the glass surface, offering calcium phosphate precipitation nucleation sites, the reduced CPP-ACPF hardness values when compared with BAG may be ascribed to its amorphous structure, which prevents it from adhering to the tooth enamel surface, as BAG does. Consequently, it does not remineralize the tooth surface over an extended period to increase the hardness. 30 Dong et al. 31 examined several types of BAG, one of which included 45S5, and demonstrated a mineralized layer with a 4 μm average thickness had formed, filling enamel porosities. The results of this research coincide with those of the study by Chabuk and Al-Shamma 32 which concluded that BAG improved enamel hardness. The effect of CPP-ACPF on enamel hardness was much greater than that in the artificial saliva group). This finding coincides with Attar IJ, Ghaib NH, 33 Al-Janabi, S.Z.; Al-Dahan, 34 and Bandekar et al. 35 demonstrating the effectiveness of CPP-ACPF in remineralizing artificial carious lesions. Reynolds et al. 36 concluded that this is connected to the capacity of CPP to function as a bioavailable calcium and phosphate using ACP localization on the tooth’s surface and assisting in the preservation of a supersaturated state of the tooth enamel, whereby de-mineralization is prevented and remineralization is improved. Contrary to our findings, an in vitro investigation by Vyavhare et al. 37 discovered that CPP-ACP does not exhibit a significant amount of surface remineralization. This discrepancy may have resulted from differences in experimental design and treatment regimens employed.

The weight percentages of calcium and phosphorus ions were used to assess mineral alterations on the enamel surface quantitatively. The results of EDX discovered that calcium and phosphorus declined after demineralization, referring to rapid loss of minerals, and rising following remineralization in all groups, showing a mineral gain. The BAG+CPP-ACPF group had the highest mean calcium and phosphorus levels, followed by the BAG and CPP-ACPF groups, whereas the control and WSL groups had the lowest mean levels, with a significant difference between the groups. The average calcium and phosphorus levels were substantially higher in the BAG group than in the CPP-ACPF group. An in vitro method used in research by Narayana et al. 38 revealed that bioactive glass had more efficacy in remineralization than CPP-ACPF. This explains that phosphate and calcium ions were continuously released into the surrounding environment for several days, acting as reservoirs for these ions. Burwell et al. 39 concluded that the BAG released ions and changed into HCA for a maximum of 14 days, which was deficient in CPP-ACPF action. Moreover, the CPP-ACPF group displayed higher mean calcium and phosphorus values than the control group. This could be attributed to the capacity of the CPP-ACP complex to act as a transporter, carrying fluoride, calcium, and phosphorus ions to the tooth surface. Somasundaram et al. 40 concluded that by depressing de-mineralization and promoting remineralization, the CPP-ACPF preserves the mineral saturation levels, especially those of phosphate and calcium, at the tooth surface. Because CPP-ACPF can remineralize surface lesions but not early enamel caries at the subsurface level, it can prevent fast calcium and phosphate precipitation, which lowers the calcium and phosphorus ratios. This is why the results of this research showed that CPP-ACPFF had lower calcium and phosphorus percentages than BAG. To the best of our knowledge, no investigations have been performed in the BAG+CPP-ACPF-treated group employing BAG to treat WSL before applying CPP-ACPF. The combined effect of BAG+CPP-ACPF significantly improved the surface microhardness and mineral content (calcium and phosphorus). The BAG rich in calcium, phosphate, and silica was gradually substituted by hydrogen ions, and CPP-ACPF acted as a transporter for calcium and phosphate to enhance remineralization of the enamel surface, providing a synergistic effect on the microhardness and mineral content of enamel and explain the results of this investigation. Based on the outcomes derived from the current study, the null hypothesis is thus rejected. This is due to a clear and noteworthy variation in surface microhardness and mineral content observed across the various stages (baseline, demineralization, and remineralization), as well as within the three methodologies (BAG+CPP-ACPF, BAG, and CPP-ACPF).

This is an in vitro study, it is difficult to create an accurate and identical environment typical of the oral cavity with its multifactorial influences such as enzymes, plaque, salivary proteins, and continuous salivary flow, all of which have a substantial impact on the effectiveness of the materials employed and, eventually, the outcomes that are achieved. The intricacy and traits of enamel lesions might not be completely captured by the use of artificial lesions. The Sample size and duration of the study may affect statistical results. Further investigation is required to generalize the results of this research. A perfect proportion between the overall surface quality and hardness can also be maintained by assessing the efficacy of various polishing methods and investigating the use of surface modifiers.

Conclusion

Considering these results, it can be stated that the BAG+CPP-ACPF group demonstrated potential utility in increasing WSL remineralization, as evidenced by its ability to enhance enamel remineralization much better than the commercially available BAG and CPP-ACP groups. However, its clinical utility needs to be confirmed by additional in vivo testing.

Ethics and consent

This research project was approved by the research ethics committee of the College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq. Ref. number: 724. Date: 28-12-2022. Written informed consent was obtained.

Supplementary Figures

Figure S1: (MI varnish) Casein PhosphoPeptide-Amorphous Calcium Phosphate (CPP-APCF)

Figure S2: Bioactive glass 45S5 Sylc ® powder

Figure S3: Measuring the dimensions of the tooth

Figure S4: A: silicon mold

B: Enamel slab in an acrylic block

Figure S5: A: Enamel slabs before demineralization

B: Enamel slabs with Artificial WSL after demineralization procedure.

Figure S6: AquaCare air abrasion device

Figure S7: Vickers microhardness tester

Figure S8: EDX device

Data availability statement

Figshare: Efficacy of different remineralization agents on microhardness and chemical composition of enamel white spot lesion.

This project contains the following underlying data: I. Raw data for microhardness test: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25638120.v1. 41

This project contains the following underlying data: surface Microhardness at three time periods for each remineralizing agent: Baseline, after demineralization, and after remineralization. II. Raw data EDX results: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25669062.v1. 42

This project contains the following underlying data: surface mineral content (Ca, P) at the Baseline, after demineralization, and after remineralization for all groups.

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).

Extended data

Pictures of the material and equipment used in the study, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25638144.v1. 43

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).

10.5256/f1000research.163586.r311070
Reviewer response for version 1
Shah Shahzad Ali 1Referee https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1686-9224

1 Conservative dental sciences, College of dentistry, Qassim University, Qassim, Saudi Arabia
19 8 2024 Copyright: © 2024 Shah SA
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Version 1recommendationapprove
Based on the information provided,

1.  the study was well designed and executed.

2. The sample size mentioned was 20 which was divided into two groups. please explain, how the sample size was calculated, and what was the reason for extraction of these premolars?

3. the references should be updated according to the guidelines for authors stated in the journal website.

4. Some of the references are too old and should be replaced with new ones, here are some suggestions,

Shah SA et al, 2024 [Ref 1]

Alessa N et al, 2024 [Ref 2]

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

I cannot comment. A qualified statistician is required.

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

consultant restorative dentistry, Associate professor, Diploma in Medical education

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Ghanem Rafal
23 8 2024 I would like to thank you for your comment and for reviewing.

The reason for teeth extraction is for orthodontic purposes and I mentioned that in the text.

I add a sample size estimation. 

I replace the old reference with one of your suggestions.

Thank you again for your worthy comment.

10.5256/f1000research.163586.r295143
Reviewer response for version 1
Samir Salma Rehab 1Referee https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4702-1947

1 College of Dentistry El Alamein, AAST, New Alamein, Egypt
15 7 2024 Copyright: © 2024 Samir Salma R
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Version 1recommendationapprove
Dear authors, first, thank you for this interesting topic. In general, the manuscript is well written.

However, there are few points to be addressed. 

Introduction: You should include a null hypothesis for the study.

Materials and methods: you should mention the type of this study. You didn’t mention sample size estimation. May be if the number of samples per group increased, this would have yield different results!! This could be confirmed if you did a sample size estimation. Please justify. There is lack of randomization. Results: Tables footnotes should be added.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Pediatric dentistry

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Ghanem Rafal
23 8 2024 Dear Dr. Rehab Samir Salma

I would first like to thank you for reviewing my manuscript.

I am very grateful for your comments.

This is an in-vitro study.

The null hypotheses state: There was no difference in enamel microhardness and mineral content between the experimental and control groups. 

While the alternative hypothesis states there was a difference in enamel microhardness and mineral content between the experimental and control groups 

Based on the outcomes derived from the current study, the null hypothesis is thus rejected. This is due to a clear and noteworthy variation in surface microhardness and mineral content observed across the various stages (baseline, demineralization, and remineralization), as well as within the three methodologies (BAG+CPP-ACPF, BAG, and CPP-ACPF).

Sample size:

Utilizing G power 3.1.9.7 (via Franz-Faul, Universidad Kiel program, Germany) with the power of study 80%, alpha error of probability 0.05, the correlation between time points is 0.5 and the effect size of F is 0.25 with four groups and three-time points, with all these conditions, the sample size is 36 samples, thus 40 samples for microhardness were enough for this study while 60 samples for EDX analysis

Randomization:  The distribution of enamel slabs for microhardness and EDX groups in a random manner. 

Each slab from the same tooth was distributed among the different groups in a random manner.

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Competing interests: no competing interests

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Competing interests: There is no competing interests that might be construed to influence my judgment of the article's or peer review report's validity or importance.
==== Refs
References

1 Mendes AC Restrepo M Bussaneli D : Use of casein amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) on white-spot lesions: Randomised clinical trial. Oral Health Prev. Dent. 2018 Jan 1;16 (1 ):27–31. 10.3290/j.ohpd.a39749 29372191
2 Selwitz RH Ismail AI Pitts NB : Dental caries. Lancet. 2007 Jan 6;369 (9555 ):51–59. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60031-2 17208642
3 Sangamesh B Kallury A : Iatrogenic effects of orthodontic treatment–Review on white spot lesions. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 2011 May;2 (5 ):2–16.
4 Peters MC McLean ME : Minimally Invasive Operative Care: I. Minimal Intervention and Concepts for Minimally Invasive Cavity Preparations. J. Adhes. Dent. 2001 Mar 1;3 (1 ):7–16. 11317386
5 Chambers C Stewart S Su B : Prevention and treatment of demineralisation during fixed appliance therapy: a review of current methods and future applications. Br. Dent. J. 2013 Nov 23;215 (10 ):505–511. 10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.1094 24264666
6 Reynolds E : Casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate: the scientific evidence. Adv. Dent. Res. 2009 Aug;21 (1 ):25–29. 10.1177/0895937409335619 19717407
7 Fahad AH Al-Weheb AM : Effect of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate on the microhardness and microscopic features of the sound enamel and initial caries-like lesion of permanent teeth, compared to fluoridated agents. J. Bagh. Coll. Dent. 2012;24 (4 ):114–120.
8 Walsh LJ : Evidence that demands a verdict: latest developments in remineralization therapies. Aust Dent Prac. 2009;48–59.
9 Al-Khateeb S Exterkate R Angmar-Månsson B : Effect of acid-etching on remineralization of enamel white spot lesions. Acta Odontol. Scand. 2000 Jan 1;58 (1 ):31–36. 10.1080/000163500429406 10809397
10 Banerjee A Pabari H Paolinelis G : An in vitro evaluation of selective demineralised enamel removal using bio-active glass air abrasion. Clin. Oral Investig. 2011 Dec;15 :895–900. 10.1007/s00784-010-0470-2 20941634
11 Hu S Chang J Liu M : Study on antibacterial effect of 45S5 Bioglass ®. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2009 Jan;20 :281–286. 10.1007/s10856-008-3564-5 18763024
12 Taha AA Fleming PS Hill RG : Enamel remineralization with novel bioactive glass air abrasion. J. Dent. Res. 2018 Dec;97 (13 ):1438–1444. 10.1177/0022034518792048 30081719
13 King OJ Milly H Boyes V : The effect of air-abrasion on the susceptibility of sound enamel to acid challenge. J. Dent. 2016 Mar 1;46 :36–41. 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.01.009 26808159
14 Golpayegani MV Sohrabi A Biria M : Remineralization effect of topical NovaMin versus sodium fluoride (1.1%) on caries-like lesions in permanent teeth. J. Dent (Tehran, Iran). 2012;9 (1 ):68.
15 Ansari MY Agarwal DK Gupta A : Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets with different base designs: comparative in-vitro study. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2016 Nov;10 (11 ):ZC64–ZC68. 10.7860/JCDR/2016/20624.8910 28050507
16 Bakry AS Abbassy MA : Increasing the efficiency of CPP-ACP to remineralize enamel white spot lesions. J. Dent. 2018 Sep 1;76 :52–57. 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.06.006 29933004
17 Parry J Shaw L Arnaud MJ : Investigation of mineral waters and soft drinks in relation to dental erosion. J. Oral Rehabil. 2001 Aug;28 (8 ):766–772. 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00795.x 11556958
18 Hua F Yan J Zhao S : In vitro remineralization of enamel white spot lesions with a carrier-based amorphous calcium phosphate delivery system. Clin. Oral Investig. 2020 Jun;24 :2079–2089. 10.1007/s00784-019-03073-x 31705307
19 Huang SB Gao SS Yu HY : Effect of nano-hydroxyapatite concentration on remineralization of initial enamel lesion in vitro. Biomed. Mater. 2009 Jun 5;4 (3 ):034104. 10.1088/1748-6041/4/3/034104 19498220
20 Bakry AS Abbassy MA Alharkan HF : A novel fluoride containing bioactive glass paste is capable of re-mineralizing early caries lesions. Materials. 2018 Sep 6;11 (9 ):1636. 10.3390/ma11091636 30200640
21 Amaechi BT Porteous N Ramalingam K : Remineralization of artificial enamel lesions by theobromine. Caries Res. 2013 Sep 1;47 (5 ):399–405. 10.1159/000348589 23615395
22 Cury JA Simoes GS Del Bel Cury AA : Effect of a calcium carbonate-based dentifrice on in situ enamel remineralization. Caries Res. 2005 May 13;39 (3 ):255–257. 10.1159/000084807 15914990
23 Elkassas D Arafa A : Remineralizing efficacy of different calcium-phosphate and fluoride based delivery vehicles on artificial caries like enamel lesions. J. Dent. 2014 Apr 1;42 (4 ):466–474. 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.12.017 24412586
24 Yu OY Zhao IS Mei ML : A review of the common models used in mechanistic studies on demineralization-remineralization for cariology research. Dent. J (Basel). 2017 Jun 18;5 (2 ):20. 10.3390/dj5020020 29563426
25 Silverstone LM Wefel JS Zimmerman BF : RemineraIization of Natural and Artificial Lesions in Human Dental Enamel in vitro: Effect of Calcium Concentration of the Calcifying Fluid. Caries Res. 1981 Nov 17;15 (2 ):138–157. 10.1159/000260512 6937261
26 Shubbar M Addie A Al-Taee L : The effect of a Bioactive oral system and CO2 laser on enamel susceptibility to acid challenge. Diagnostics. 2023 Mar 13;13 (6 ):1087. 10.3390/diagnostics13061087 36980395
27 Meredith N Sherriff M Setchell DJ : Measurement of the microhardness and Young’s modulus of human enamel and dentine using an indentation technique. Arch. Oral Biol. 1996 Jun 1;41 (6 ):539–545. 10.1016/0003-9969(96)00020-9 8937644
28 Alessa N Shah SA Bhardwaj R : Assessment of Efficiency of Bioactive Glass, Self-Assembling Peptide, and Ozone Remineralising Agents on Artificial Carious Lesion. Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada. 2024 Feb 2;24 : e220123. 10.1590/pboci.2024.018
29 Mehta AB Kumari V Jose R : Remineralization potential of bioactive glass and casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate on initial carious lesion: An: in-vitro: pH-cycling study. J. Conserv. Dent. 2014 Jan 1;17 (1 ):3–7. 10.4103/0972-0707.124085 24554851
30 Andersson ÖH Kangasniemi I : Calcium phosphate formation at the surface of bioactive glass in vitro. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1991 Aug;25 (8 ):1019–1030. 10.1002/jbm.820250808 1918106
31 Dong Z Chang J Zhou Y : In vitro remineralization of human dental enamel by bioactive glasses. J. Mater. Sci. 2011 Mar;46 :1591–1596. 10.1007/s10853-010-4968-4
32 Chabuk MM Al-Shamma AM : Surface roughness and microhardness of enamel white spot lesions treated with different treatment methods. Heliyon. 2023 Jul 1;9 (7 ):e18283. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18283 37539286
33 Attar IJ Ghaib NH : The effect of some remineralization materials and resin infiltration (ICON) on the depth of white spot lesions. J. Bagh. Coll. Dent. 2018 Jun 15;30 (2 ):71–75. 10.12816/0049755
34 Al-Janabi SZ Al-Dahan ZA : The Effects of Nano-Hydroxyapatite and Casein Phosphopeptide-Amorphous Calcium Phosphate in Preventing Loss of Minerals from Teeth after Exposure to an Acidic Beverage: An in vitro Study. JBCD. 2015, Dec;325 (3129 ):1–6.
35 Bandekar S Patil S Dudulwar D : Remineralization potential of fluoride, amorphous calcium phosphate-casein phosphopeptide, and combination of hydroxylapatite and fluoride on enamel lesions: An: in vitro: comparative evaluation. J. Conserv. Dent. 2019 May 1;22 (3 ):305–309. 10.4103/JCD.JCD_13_19 31367119
36 Reynolds EC Cai F Shen P : Retention in plaque and remineralization of enamel lesions by various forms of calcium in a mouthrinse or sugar-free chewing gum. J. Dent. Res. 2003 Mar;82 (3 ):206–211. 10.1177/154405910308200311 12598550
37 Vyavhare S Sharma DS Kulkarni VK : Effect of three different pastes on remineralization of initial enamel lesion: an in vitro study. J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent. 2015 Jan 1;39 (2 ):149–160. 10.17796/jcpd.39.2.yn2r54nw24l03741 25823485
38 Narayana SS Deepa VK Ahamed S : Remineralization efficiency of bioactive glass on artificially induced carious lesion an in-vitro study. J. Indian Soc. Pedod. Prev. Dent. 2014 Jan 1;32 (1 ):19–25. 10.4103/0970-4388.127047 24531597
39 Burwell AK Litkowski LJ Greenspan DC : Calcium sodium phosphosilicate (NovaMin ®): remineralization potential. Adv. Dent. Res. 2009 Aug;21 (1 ):35–39. 10.1177/0895937409335621 19710080
40 Somasundaram P Vimala N Mandke LG : Protective potential of casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate containing paste on enamel surfaces. J. Conserv. Dent. 2013 Mar 1;16 (2 ):152–156. 10.4103/0972-0707.108199 23716969
41 Ghanim RAFAL : Raw data for microhardness test.docx.Dataset. figshare. 10.6084/m9.figshare.25638120
42 Ghanim RAFAL : Raw data EDX RESULTS.docx.Dataset. figshare. 2024. 10.6084/m9.figshare.25669062
43 Ghanim RAFAL : pictures.docx. figshare. Media. 2024. 10.6084/m9.figshare.25638144
