
==== Front
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992)
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992)
ramb
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
0104-4230
1806-9282
Associação Médica Brasileira

00100
10.1590/1806-9282.20240509
Editorial
Cytomegalovirus and pregnancy: current evidence for clinical practice
https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9044-6397
Pontes Karina Felippe Monezi Writing – original draft 1 2
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6145-2532
Araujo Edward Júnior Supervision Writing – original draft 1 3 *
1 Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Paulista School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics – São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
2 Ipiranga Hospital, Service of Gynecology and Obstetrics – São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
3 Universidade Municipal de São Caetano do Sul, Discipline of Woman Health – São Caetano do Sul (SP), Brazil.
*Corresponding author: araujojred@terra.com.br
Conflicts of interest: the authors declare there is no conflicts of interest.

02 9 2024
2024
70 8 e2024050908 4 2024
19 4 2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
==== Body
pmcCytomegalovirus (CMV) is an enveloped DNA virus that, due to several intrinsic characteristics, establishes itself in granulocytes and monocytes after primary infection and becomes a lifelong latent infection 1,2 . CMV is the most common congenital viral infection in the world, with a prevalence rate of approximately 0.5–2.0% among all live births 1-3 . CMV is the first cause of permanent sequelae in childhood, accounting for one-fourth of cases of congenital sensorineural hearing loss, 10% of cases of cerebral palsy, and severe neurological abnormalities, vision loss, and growth disorders 1-3 .

Global serum prevalence in women of childbearing age is approximately 86% 4 . This is important because only 50% of congenital CMV cases are maternal primary infections 5 . A Brazilian study confirmed the fact that most newborns affected by CMV come from previously infected/immune mothers (1–3% vertical transmission), but, in maternal primary infection, the vertical transmission rate is five times higher (30–40% vertical transmission) 6 .

CMV is transmitted by direct contact of mucous membranes with contaminated body fluids such as urine, saliva, blood, genital secretions, tears, contaminated breast milk, solid organ transplants, and stem cells 7-9 . Symptoms in immunocompetent individuals are few and nonspecific or absent, but it can cause severe disease in immunosuppressed individuals, including fetuses 1,8 . There is no vaccine for CMV, despite numerous ongoing studies 10 . Until 2020, it was believed that the only way to prevent vertical transmission of CMV was through behavioral measures such as hand hygiene, avoiding contact with children's diapers, and avoiding kissing young children 10 .

Until 2022, no guideline published in English suggested testing for CMV in prenatal care 7 . Reasons varied, including lack of vaccine, difficulty interpreting tests, inability to treat, and lack of randomized controlled trials 7 . Eventually, serologies were requested by physicians at random or when CMV was suspected because of maternal symptoms, contact with children with symptoms, or fetal findings suggestive of CMV 7 .

The research on CMV in pregnancy is carried out mainly through specific antibody tests (IgG, IgM, and IgG avidity) or by detecting CMV DNA in body fluids (blood, urine, and saliva) 3 . Table 1 summarizes maternal serologies and how to interpret the results. Congenital CMV infection can damage the fetus directly or indirectly through placental dysfunction, resulting in miscarriage, preterm birth, or fetal growth restriction (FGR) 10,11 . The gestational age can influence vertical transmission, being higher with the progression of pregnancy 10,12 . When the virus crosses the placental barrier, the first fetal organ to be infected replicates in the tubular epithelium of the fetal kidney, with tropism for reticuloendothelial cells and the central nervous system (CNS) 10,12 . Shahar-Nissan et al. 13 describe that there is a cascade of events that culminate in fetal infection. This cascade of events can take 7–8 weeks, and it is described as maternal viremia, placental infection, and fetal dissemination via the hematogenous route. Therefore, amniotic fluid testing should be performed 8 weeks after the presumed period of infection and preferably after 22 weeks of gestation to reduce the risk of false negative results 10,14 . In newborns, it is performed by viral detection in body fluids (urine, saliva, and blood) by PCR, culture, or antigen testing until 3 weeks of life 2,10 . After this period, it is difficult to distinguish congenital from acquired postnatal infection 2,10 .

Table 1 Maternal serology and interpretation of the results.

Serology	Interpretation of the results	
IgG - IgM -	Susceptible	
IgG + IgM -	Immune/previous contact	
IgG + IgM + high IgG avidity	Infection older than 12 weeks	
IgG + IgM + low IgG avidity	Infection less than 12 weeks old	
IgG - IgM +
IgG + IgM + after 15 days
IgG - IgM + after 15 days	Possible recent infection, repeat serology in 15 days
Recent infection/seroconversion
False positive for cytomegalovirus	

Chatzakis et al. 12 in a meta-analysis, divided the fetal findings according to the period of maternal infection: periconceptional (4 weeks before to 3–6 weeks after the last menstrual period), first (6–13 weeks), second (14–26 weeks), and third trimester (>26 weeks). Fetal abnormalities were limited to periconceptional and first-trimester infections with rates of 28.8, 19.3, 0.9, and 0.4% for periconceptional, first-, second-, and third-trimester infections, respectively.

When the virus crosses the placental barrier and reaches the fetus, fetal damage is progressive and the first ultrasound findings are usually due to systemic infection and nonspecific (FGR, abnormal amniotic fluid volume, ascites, pleural effusion, skin edema, hydrops, placentomegaly, hyperechogenic bowel, splenomegaly, liver calcifications) 15 . CNS findings usually occur after weeks, and severe brain involvement is usually a predictor of poor prognosis, with microcephaly being the only finding that actually predicts an unfavorable outcome in up to 95% of cases 15,16 . The most common ultrasound findings are ventriculomegaly, periventricular changes, temporal cysts, and brain parenchymal lesions 16 .

Since 2005, when Nigro et al. 17 published a nonrandomized study proposing the use of hyperimmune globulin for the treatment and prevention of congenital CMV, several promising studies have been published. The efficacy of hyperimmune globulin has not been proven in subsequent studies 18,19 ; however, high-dose valacyclovir has been shown in several studies and systematic reviews to be effective and safe in preventing vertical transmission of CMV in primary maternal infections acquired during the periconceptional period and the first trimester of pregnancy 3,5,13,15,20-24 . Acyclovir is the precursor drug to valacyclovir and is converted to acyclovir in the first hepatic passage. Valacyclovir has been a drug of choice for herpes virus infections as it is more effective than acyclovir 24 , which is classified as class B in pregnancy 22 . Treatment with valacyclovir is contraindicated in people who are unable to swallow capsules, in cases of severe vomiting, pre-existing liver disease, renal dysfunction, bone marrow suppression, patients receiving immunotherapy, or in cases of hypersensitivity to acyclovir 13 . The most common adverse reactions of valacyclovir are thrombocytopenia (usually mild), nausea, headache, abdominal pain, and nonspecific rash, none of which were significant and did not require discontinuation of the drug in a study by Shahar-Nissan et al. 13 .

In 2016, Leruez-Ville et al. 15 in their nonrandomized study, showed a reduction in asymptomatic newborns from 43% (no treatment) to 82% with the use of high-dose valacyclovir (8 g/day) in fetuses with extra-brain and brain findings suggestive of vertical transmission of CMV. In 2020, Shahar-Nissan et al. 13 published a double-blind, randomized trial of valacyclovir (8 g/day) for the prevention of CMV congenital infection acquired periconceptionally or in the first trimester. The amniotic fluid PCR positivity rate was 30% in the control group compared with 11% in the treated group. Since this publication, at least six large studies, including meta-analyses and phase 3 trials, have been published confirming the use of valacyclovir 8 g/day for the prevention of CMV vertical transmission of maternal primary infection in the early stages of pregnancy (periconceptional and first trimester) 3,5,15,20-24 .

Given the serious consequences of congenital CMV, the number of children worldwide who develop permanent and often severe sequelae each year, and the high prevalence of CMV in the population together with the strong evidence that valacyclovir is effective and safe in preventing vertical transmission, we suggest that protocols be revised to include routine CMV serology in the prenatal period (first visit and repeated at 12–14 weeks) when resources are available and especially in the event of seroconversion. Treatment with valacyclovir 8 g/day (4 g 12/12 h) should be started for at least 7 weeks after the estimated date of seroconversion and until at least 21 weeks when amniocentesis for amniotic fluid PCR for CMV is indicated 3,5,13,15,20-24 . Figure 1 shows suggested follow-up and treatment according to the serologies found during prenatal care.

Figure 1 Flowchart of the suggested follow-up and treatment according to the maternal serologies during prenatal care.

Funding: none.
==== Refs
REFERENCES

1 Kenneson A Cannon MJ. Review and meta-analysis of the epidemiology of congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection Rev Med Virol 2007 17 4 253 276 10.1002/rmv.535 17579921
2 Swanson EC Schleiss MR. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection: new prospects for prevention and therapy Pediatr Clin North Am 2013 60 2 335 349 10.1016/j.pcl.2012.12.008 23481104
3 Zammarchi L Tomasoni LR Liuzzi G Simonazzi G Dionisi C Mazzarelli LL Treatment with valacyclovir during pregnancy for prevention of congenital cytomegalovirus infection: a real-life multicenter Italian observational study Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2023 5 10 101101 101101 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101101 37516151
4 Zuhair M Smit GSA Wallis G Jabbar F Smith C Devleesschauwer B Estimation of the worldwide seroprevalence of cytomegalovirus: a systematic review and meta-analysis Rev Med Virol 2019 29 3 e2034 10.1002/rmv.2034 30706584
5 Chatzakis C Shahar-Nissan K Faure-Bardon V Picone O Hadar E Amir J The effect of valacyclovir on secondary prevention of congenital cytomegalovirus infection, following primary maternal infection acquired periconceptionally or in the first trimester of pregnancy. An individual patient data meta-analysis Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024 230 2 109 17.e2 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.07.022 37473793
6 Mussi-Pinhata MM Yamamoto AY Aragon DC Duarte G Fowler KB Boppana S Seroconversion for cytomegalovirus infection during pregnancy and fetal infection in a highly seropositive population: "The BraCHS Study" J Infect Dis 2018 218 8 1200 1204 10.1093/infdis/jiy321 29868783
7 Xie M Tripathi T Holmes NE Hui L. Serological screening for cytomegalovirus during pregnancy: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements Prenat Diagn 2023 43 7 959 967 10.1002/pd.6397 37309996
8 Fowler K Mucha J Neumann M Lewandowski W Kaczanowska M Grys M A systematic literature review of the global seroprevalence of cytomegalovirus: possible implications for treatment, screening, and vaccine development BMC Public Health 2022 22 1 1659 1659 10.1186/s12889-022-13971-7 36050659
9 Price SM Bonilla E Zador P Levis DM Kilgo CL Cannon MJ. Educating women about congenital cytomegalovirus: assessment of health education materials through a web-based survey BMC Womens Health 2014 14 144 144 10.1186/s12905-014-0144-3 25433837
10 Pontes KFM Nardozza LMM Peixoto AB Werner H Tonni G Granese R Cytomegalovirus and pregnancy: a narrative review J Clin Med 2024 13 2 640 640 10.3390/jcm13020640 38276146
11 Njue A Coyne C Margulis AV Wang D Marks MA Russell K The role of congenital cytomegalovirus infection in adverse birth outcomes: a review of the potential mechanisms Viruses 2020 13 1 20 20 10.3390/v13010020 33374185
12 Chatzakis C Ville Y Makrydimas G Dinas K Zavlanos A Sotiriadis A. Timing of primary maternal cytomegalovirus infection and rates of vertical transmission and fetal consequences Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020 223 6 870 83.e11 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.038 32460972
13 Shahar-Nissan K Pardo J Peled O Krause I Bilavsky E Wiznitzer A Valaciclovir to prevent vertical transmission of cytomegalovirus after maternal primary infection during pregnancy: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Lancet 2020 396 10253 779 785 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31868-7 32919517
14 Dinsmoor MJ Fette LM Hughes BL Rouse DJ Saade GR Reddy UM Amniocentesis to diagnose congenital cytomegalovirus infection following maternal primary infection Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2022 4 4 100641 100641 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100641 35526782
15 Leruez-Ville M Ghout I Bussières L Stirnemann J Magny JF Couderc S In utero treatment of congenital cytomegalovirus infection with valacyclovir in a multicenter, open-label, phase II study Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016 215 4 462.e1 10 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.04.003
16 Kyriakopoulou A Serghiou S Dimopoulou D Arista I Psaltopoulou T Dinopoulos A Antenatal imaging and clinical outcome in congenital CMV infection: a field-wide systematic review and meta-analysis J Infect 2020 80 4 407 418 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.02.012 32097687
17 Nigro G Adler SP Torre R Best AM Congenital Cytomegalovirus Collaborating Group. Passive immunization during pregnancy for congenital cytomegalovirus infection N Engl J Med 2005 353 13 1350 1362 10.1056/NEJMoa043337 16192480
18 Fitzpatrick A Cooper C Vasilunas N Ritchie B. Describing the impact of maternal hyperimmune globulin and valacyclovir on the outcomes of cytomegalovirus infection in pregnancy: a systematic review Clin Infect Dis 2022 75 8 1467 1480 10.1093/cid/ciac297 35438780
19 Hughes BL Clifton RG Rouse DJ Saade GR Dinsmoor MJ Reddy UM A trial of hyperimmune globulin to prevent congenital cytomegalovirus infection N Engl J Med 2021 385 5 436 444 10.1056/NEJMoa1913569 34320288
20 Seidel V Feiterna-Sperling C Siedentopf JP Hofmann J Henrich W Bührer C Intrauterine therapy of cytomegalovirus infection with valganciclovir: review of the literature Med Microbiol Immunol 2017 206 5 347 354 10.1007/s00430-017-0512-3 28733760
21 Egloff C Sibiude J Vauloup-Fellous C Benachi A Bouthry E Biquard F New data on efficacy of valacyclovir in secondary prevention of maternal-fetal transmission of cytomegalovirus Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2023 61 1 59 66 10.1002/uog.26039 35900718
22 D'Antonio F Marinceu D Prasad S Khalil A. Effectiveness and safety of prenatal valacyclovir for congenital cytomegalovirus infection: systematic review and meta-analysis Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2023 61 4 436 444 10.1002/uog.26136 36484439
23 Amir J Chodick G Pardo J. Revised protocol for secondary prevention of congenital cytomegalovirus infection with valaciclovir following infection in early pregnancy Clin Infect Dis 2023 77 3 467 471 10.1093/cid/ciad230 37157938
24 Faure-Bardon V Fourgeaud J Stirnemann J Leruez-Ville M Ville Y. Secondary prevention of congenital cytomegalovirus infection with valacyclovir following maternal primary infection in early pregnancy Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2021 58 4 576 581 10.1002/uog.23685 33998084
