
==== Front
JMIR Public Health Surveill
JMIR Public Health Surveill
JPH
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
2369-2960
JMIR Publications Toronto, Canada

v10i1e54318
38780218
10.2196/54318
Original Paper
Original Paper
Dose-Response Relationship Between Physical Activity and the Morbidity and Mortality of Cardiovascular Disease Among Individuals With Diabetes: Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies
Mavragani Amaryllis
Arbabisarjou Azizollah
Lai Byron
Li Jingen
Ma Yanan
Yuan Hairui
Li Sihao
Chen Yang BS 1https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7537-7705

Jin Xingsheng BS 1https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1510-7250

Chen Guochong PhD 2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6815-5653

Wang Ru PhD 1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9301-2323

Tian Haili PhD https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6455-5465
1School of Exercise and Health Shanghai University of Sport Yangpu District Qingyuan Huan Road 650 Shanghai, 200438 China 86 13512281696 tianhaili123@163.com

1 School of Exercise and Health Shanghai University of Sport Shanghai China
2 Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene School of Public Health Soochow University Suzhou China
Corresponding Author: Haili Tian tianhaili123@163.com
2024
19 8 2024
10 e543186 11 2023
5 4 2024
11 4 2024
23 5 2024
©Yang Chen, Xingsheng Jin, Guochong Chen, Ru Wang, Haili Tian. Originally published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (https://publichealth.jmir.org), 19.08.2024.
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://publichealth.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

Background

Diabetes, a chronic condition affecting various organs, is frequently associated with abnormal lipid metabolism, notably increased cholesterol and triglyceride levels. These lipid abnormalities are closely linked to the development and advancement of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Although regular physical activity (PA) has consistently shown benefits in reducing CVD risk in the general population, its precise influence on CVD risk among patients with diabetes remains uncertain, particularly regarding dose-response relationships.

Objective

This study aimed to summarize the evidence from prospective studies on the association between PA and CVD morbidity and mortality in individuals with diabetes and explore the optimal levels for public health recommendation.

Methods

We systematically reviewed prospective cohort studies in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to December 2022, with inclusion criteria specifying the studies published in English and included adult participants diagnosed with diabetes. A random effects model was used to pool the relative risk (RR) with the corresponding 95% CI comparing the highest with the lowest PA categories in each study for qualitative evaluation. In addition, linear and spline regression analyses were used to estimate dose-response associations.

Results

The meta-analysis included 12 prospective cohort studies, involving a total of 109,820 participants with diabetes. The combined results revealed that higher levels of PA were associated with a reduced risk of CVD. The RR of CVD for the highest compared with the lowest PA category was 0.62 (95% CI 0.51-0.73). In addition, there were 4 studies describing leisure-time PA, and the pooled RR was 0.68 (95% CI 0.52-0.83) for the highest versus the lowest activity. The linear regression model revealed that each 10 MET (metabolic equivalent of task)-hours per week of incrementally higher PA was associated with a 19% (95% CI 11.6-25.7) and a 6.9% (95% CI 4.5-9.3) reduction in CVD morbidity and mortality. Additionally, spline regression curves showed nonlinear relationships between PA levels and the risk of CVD and CVD mortality (both Pnonlinearity<.001), with a limited reduction in CVD risk and some further reduction in CVD mortality above 20 MET-hours per week of PA levels.

Conclusions

For patients with diabetes, especially type 2 diabetes, there was a dose-response relationship between increased PA and reduced risk of CVD morbidity and mortality. The observed PA threshold is consistent with the recommended level for the general population. Gradually moving from inactivity to a guideline-recommended PA level could therefore significantly reduce the burden of CVD in patients with diabetes.

cardiovascular risk
diabetics
exercise
dose-response association
meta-analysis
physical activity
diabetes
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Diabetes, as a chronic disease, poses a significant risk to the functionality of multiple organs. Alongside the impairment of nerves and blood vessels, diabetes can lead to various severe complications, including retinopathy, nephropathy, and diabetic foot ulcers [1-3]. Data from the International Diabetes Federation showed that 6.7 million people died from diabetes in 2019, and 1 in 10 adults aged 20-79 years had diabetes, totaling 537 million people [4]. Medical spending on diabetes accounts for 9% of the global health spending, totaling US $966 million. By 2045, there will be an increase of 3.6 million people with diabetes worldwide, and the increase in diabetes-related health expenditures will exceed 206 billion, and the number of people who will die from diabetes will increase by 2.5 million [5,6]. Patients with diabetes often exhibit abnormal lipid metabolism, including elevated levels of cholesterol and triglycerides [7]. These abnormal lipid levels are closely associated with the occurrence and progression of cardiovascular disease (CVD) [8]. CVD is a group of diseases caused by atherosclerosis, characterized by lipid deposition and plaque formation on the arterial walls, ultimately leading to vascular narrowing and obstruction [9]. In patients with diabetes, abnormal lipid metabolism accelerates the progression of atherosclerosis, thereby increasing the risk of cardiovascular events such as myocardial infarction and stroke [10]. According to the latest guidelines, adults with diabetes face 2-3 times the risk of developing CVD [11]. The risk of atrial fibrillation in patients with diabetes increases by 3%, leading to higher possibilities of stroke, heart failure, and mortality [11]. CVD remains a leading cause of death worldwide, resulting in approximately 20.5 million fatalities and accounting for one-third of the total global mortality [12,13].

The beneficial role of regular physical activity (PA) in reducing the risk of CVD has been repeatedly confirmed in the general population [14-17]. Through PA, patients with diabetes can gradually establish a healthy lifestyle, thereby improving overall health and reducing the risk of chronic diseases [18]. Regular PA has the potential to enhance insulin sensitivity, improve vascular responsiveness, and optimize cardiorespiratory fitness levels [19-21]. These physiological adaptations may contribute to a reduced incidence of CVD among individuals living with diabetes [22]. The health benefits of PA in individuals with diabetes are mentioned in existing guidelines and public health recommendations. For example, the European Society of Cardiology guidelines for PA in patients with cardiac conditions mentioned the benefits of aerobic exercise and strength training for patients with diabetes for blood glucose and blood pressure control, weight loss and improved exercise capacity, as well as increased exercise capacity and reduced risk of CVD [23]. The World Health Organization [24] recommends that 150-300 minutes of moderate to vigorous PA per week is also applicable to adults with chronic diseases such as diabetes.

However, previous prospective studies have yielded inconsistent results regarding the relationship between PA levels and CVD risk in patients with diabetes. Some literature highlights the health benefits of moderate to high PA levels in reducing CVD risk, particularly at the moderate level [5,25]. Conversely, another study suggests that the association between changes in PA levels and CVD risk factors among patients with diabetes is relatively weak, implying a limited direct impact on cardiovascular health [26]. Consequently, the dose-response relationship between PA and CVD risk remains unclear, requiring additional research for informed public health recommendations.

The primary objective of this meta-analysis was to synthesize evidence from prospective studies to elucidate the relationship between PA and CVD in patients with diabetes. Additionally, we aimed to quantify the weekly metabolic equivalent of task (MET) for PA exposure and clarify the dose-response relationship. This study aimed to provide a theoretical foundation for future exercise prescriptions for individuals with diabetes, ultimately improving health outcomes in this patient population.

Methods

Ethical Considerations

This review paper presents a secondary analysis of existing data from previously published original studies rather than a direct collection of new data. As such, ethics approval was not necessary.

Search Strategy

Electronic literature searches were conducted for cohort studies investigating the association between PA and CVD risk among individuals with diabetes. The searches were performed from inception to December 2022 for relevant studies published in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Web of Science. The study keywords used in the searches were thesaurus terms registered in MEDLINE (MeSH) or Embase (EMTREE), as well as entry words related to diabetes, PA, CVDs, and cohort study.

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

The inclusion and exclusion criteria for the study are shown in Textbox 1.

The inclusion and exclusion criteria for the study.

Inclusion criteria

Paper type: prospective cohort study.

Population: adult patients with diabetes.

Disease: outcomes are cardiovascular diseases, including fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events.

Methods: studies that provide or allow for the calculation of effect size (ie, relative risk, hazard ratio, or odds ratio) and corresponding SE for high physical activity (PA) categories compared with the lowest PA category.

Language: studies in the English language.

Exclusion criteria

Paper type: presence of additional nonpharmacological interventions.

Methods: studies lacking effect sizes or where calculation is not feasible. No stratified comparison of PA.

Language: languages other than English.

Selection Process

The titles and abstracts of a large number of publications were obtained using the aforementioned search strategy. These papers were divided equally between the 2 authors (YC and XJ) and initially screened based on the titles. Subsequently, the third author (HT) cross-checked 1100 (15%) of the 7334 documents to ensure accuracy for initial inclusion. The abstracts of the initially included studies were then read independently by both authors (YC and XJ) for inclusion. Any disagreements were referred to the third author (GC) and resolved through discussion. Finally, 1 author (RW) reviewed the full papers, and the second author (HT) cross-checked the included literature to determine the final inclusion criteria.

Data Extraction

The 2 authors (YC and XJ) independently extracted the key characteristics of the included studies, and discrepancies were resolved through discussion. When multiple effect measures, such as unadjusted and adjusted measures, were present in the included studies, the most fully adjusted measures were selected. The key characteristics of the research included, but were not limited to, the author, year of publication, study population, person-years, follow-up time, cohort status, disease diagnosis methods, and methods of measuring PA.

Assessment of Study Quality

A quality criteria scale was developed at the study level using applicable elements from the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for cohort studies. This scale has been widely used in meta-analyses of exercises and health risks. The study-level quality assessment was conducted by 2 authors (HT and RW).

Data Analysis

To assess the qualitative association between PA and CVD risk, we pooled the log relative risk (RR) of the highest versus the lowest PA categories from each study using the inverse variance method. Heterogeneity among the studies was evaluated using Q statistics and I2, both overall and within each stratum after stratification [27]. If significant between-study heterogeneity was observed, a random effects model was used to calculate the pooled estimate [28].

We also conducted subgroup analyses to explore differences between subgroups to search for possible effect modifiers or sources of heterogeneity. To verify possible sources of heterogeneity, stratified analyses were conducted on the following study characteristics that we identified based on previously extracted data from the included studies: mean follow-up duration (≤10 years or >10 years), type of diabetes (1 or 2), diabetes duration (not available, ≤10 years or >10 years), mean age (<60 years or ≥60 years), PA type (total PA or leisure-time PA), the proportion of men (≤50% or >50%), validation of PA questionnaire (no or yes), area (Asia or Europe or North America or mixtures), and mean BMI (≤25, 25, or ≤30 kg/m2) [29]. Meta-regression analysis was used to test differences between these strata.

Publication bias was primarily detected by visual assessment using funnel plots in which SE was plotted against log RR for the highest and lowest PA categories in each study. Symmetry in the plot was assumed to indicate no publication bias. In addition, a statistical assessment using the Egger regression asymmetry test confirmed the symmetry [30]. To assess the robustness of our findings, we performed a sensitivity analysis by systematically omitting 1 study at a time to evaluate its impact on the overall pooled results.

We extracted detailed information from the literature that quantified PA in subsequent dose-response analysis studies. If the graded quantification of PA in a paper was not a point estimate, we assumed a consistent width for each category of PA and considered the middle value of its upper and lower limits as the point estimate of PA for this category [31]. The same standard unit (MET-hours) was used to standardize the PA doses reported in the literature.

PA is represented by different forms of exercise, such as walking, running, moderate to vigorous exercise, and sedentary activities. For some studies that did not directly give the corresponding quantitative data, we defined the data according to the compendium, such as for different exercise intensities, using 1.0-1.5, 1.6-2.9, 3-5.9, and ≥6 MET [32]. Following the above expression, we translate it into the corresponding point estimates: 1.5, 4.5, and 7.5 MET. If the literature only stated the average duration of a given exercise, we assumed that the individuals performed it at an intensity of 4.5 MET [33,34].

First, we assumed a log-linear relationship between PA and CVD morbidity and mortality. To investigate this relationship, we used a weighted least squares regression model. In addition, we used restricted cubic spline regression models to further explore the shape of the relationship between PA and CVD outcomes. In both models, we regressed of the log RR for each nonreferent group against a higher dose of PA compared to the lowest PA category. Data analysis was conducted using STATA software (version 17; StataCorp LLC). We considered a 2-sided P value of less than .05 to be statistically significant [35].

Results

Literature Search

The complete search process is presented in Figure 1. Table S1 in Multimedia Appendix 1 presents details of the literature search of 8327 papers retrieved from MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science electronic literature searches. After a full-text review, 7 of these papers were excluded, with specific details provided in Table S2 in Multimedia Appendix 1 [26,36-41]. A total of 12 studies met the prespecified inclusion criteria [5,42-52]. Table 1 presents the characteristics of the 12 included studies. In total, 5 studies validated the PA questionnaire [43,46,48,49,51]. Most of the included studies were conducted in Europe with a total of 6 studies [44,47-49,51,52]. Of the 12 included studies, only 2 focused on patients with type 1 diabetes [47,48], while the rest exclusively studied patients with type 2 diabetes; 4 studies limited the scope of PA to leisure-time PA [42,46,48,50].

Table S3 in Multimedia Appendix 1 shows details of the confounding factors considered in each included study. In total, 4 studies detailed the patients’ CVD history [5,42,44,51], 7 studies considered social factors [5,42-45,50,51], and 4 studies took dietary factors into account [43,46,50,51]. The consideration of confounders varied among the studies, and more than half of the included studies adjusted the effect measure for all of the 5 following classic CVD risk factors: age, gender, smoking, dyslipidemia, and hypertension. A complete assessment of the quality of the literature is shown in Table S4 in Multimedia Appendix 1.

Figure 1 Study selection flowchart according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines.

Table 1 Details of characteristics of the included studies, including study region, follow-up duration, duration of diabetes, type of diabetes, and some basic information about patients.

Author (year; area)	Follow-up years, mean (SD)	d_durationa (years), mean (SD)	Age (years), mean (SD)	PAb type (d_typec)	PA_verifiedd	BMI (kg/m2), mean (SD)	Outcome	
Blomster et al (2013; 20+)e [5]	5 (—f)	7.9 (6.4)	65.8 (6.4)	Total PA (2)	Yes	28.3 (5.2)	CVDg events	
Brown et al (2014; United States) [42]	9.2 (4.9)	10.9 (8.8)	65.5 (—)	Total PA (2)	No	29.51 (—)	CVD mortality	
Chen et al (2022; China)e [43]	4.5 (—)	5 (—)	62.9 (—)	Total PA (2)	No	25.29 (—)	CVD mortality or heart disease mortality or stroke mortality	
Enguita-Germán et al (2021; Kingdom of Spain) [44]	5 (—)	7.3 (—)	70.5 (—)	Total PA (2)	No	30.6 (—)	CVD events	
Inoue et al (2020; United Mexican States)e [45]	8 (—)	— (—)	70.3 (—)	Total PA (2)	No	29.17 (—)	Nonfatal CVD events or fatal CVD event	
Sone et al (2013; Japan)e [46]	8.05 (—)	11.0 (7.1)	58.5 (—)	LTPAh (2)	No	23.0 (3.0)	CHDi only, stroke only, or both	
Tielemans et al (2013; Europe)e [47]	7 (—)	13.6 (—)	32.7 (10.2)	Total PA (1)	No	23.59 (—)	Total CVD events (men or women)	
Tikkanen-Dolenc et al (2017; Finland)e [48]	10.3 (3.4)	21.7 (12.4)	38.8 (12.4)	LTPA (1)	Yes	25.2 (3.6)	CVD events	
Vepsäläinen et al (2010; Finland) [49]	18 (—)	7.8 (—)	<60 (—)	Total PA (2)	Yes	29.2 (—)	CVD mortality or CHD mortality	
Yen et al (2022; Taiwan [China])e [50]	17 (—)	— (—)	60 (13)	LTPA (2)	Yes	24.7 (—)	CVD mortality	
Yerramalla et al (2020; United Kingdom)e [51]	8.8 (6.1)	— (—)	44.9 (6.0)	Total PA (2)	Yes	— (—)	CVD mortality	
Zethelius et al (2014; Switzerland)e [52]	4.8 (—)	5.7 (—)	59.9 (—)	Total PA (2)	No	30.04 (—)	Fatal or nonfatal CVD or fatal or nonfatal CHD or fatal CVD	
ad_duration: duration of diabetes mellitus.

bPA: physical activity.

cd_type: types of diabetes mellitus.

dPA_verified: validation of PA questionnaire.

eThis study was used for the dose-response analysis between PA and outcomes.

fNot available.

gCVD: cardiovascular disease.

hLTPA: leisure time physical activity.

iCHD: coronary artery heart disease.

Qualitative Assessment of the Association of High PA With CVD Risk

Of the 12 included studies, 5 studies included multiple outcomes, such as coronary artery heart disease (CHD), stroke, and heart disease [43,45-47,49,52]. When the outcomes of one study were fatal or nonfatal CVD, fatal or nonfatal CHD, and fatal CVD, we chose fatal or nonfatal CVD for qualitative analysis because it had greater representation [52]. When the outcomes of the study were CHD or stroke and CHD and stroke, we chose CHD for qualitative analysis [46]. When the outcomes of the study were fatal CVD, heart disease mortality, and stroke mortality, we chose fatal CVD for qualitative analysis [43]. One study included 2 separate outcomes, fatal and nonfatal CVD events, and we combined the estimates using a fixed-effects model [45]. Specific information regarding the studies included in the qualitative analysis is provided in Table S5 in Multimedia Appendix 1.

Figure 2 shows the forest plot for the risk estimate of CVD events in relation to PA in patients with diabetes. As heterogeneity was revealed by the I2 statistic (I2=72.9%; P<.001), a random effects model was used. The pooled RR of the CVD event was 0.62 (95% CI 0.51-0.73).

Table 2 shows the results of the stratified analyses for the key study characteristics in addition to the results of meta-regression analyses testing strata difference. The predefined characteristics did not significantly alter the combined relationship between PA and the risk of CVD. A consistently lower risk of CVD events was observed across all strata.

To assess publication bias, we visually inspected the funnel plots presented in Figure 3. Both sides of the funnel plot were essentially symmetrical, and the Egger test was used, and there was limited evidence for small-study effects (tX=1.13; df=10; P=.29), as shown in Figure S1 in Multimedia Appendix 1. The results of the subgroup analyses did not identify sources of heterogeneity but were consistent for the health benefits of PA, as shown in Figures S2-S10 in Multimedia Appendix 1. The results of the sensitivity analysis consistently supported our main findings, demonstrating the stability and reliability of the results, as shown in Figure S11 in Multimedia Appendix 1.

Figure 2 Forest plot illustrating the summary estimate of cardiovascular disease risk for individuals with diabetes in the highest versus lowest physical activity group along with the 95% CI. Study-specific estimates and the overall pooled estimate are depicted by circles and diamonds, respectively. Horizontal lines indicate the range of the 95% CI. The size of the squares represents the weight of each study, with larger squares indicating studies with greater weight [5,36-46]. RR: relative risk.

Table 2 Stratified analyses of pooled RRa of cardiovascular disease morbidity comparing high versus low levels of PAb.

	Studies, n (%)	RR (95% CI)	Q statistics	I² (%)	P value of heterogeneity	Meta-regressionc	
Total	12	0.62 (0.51-0.73)	40.58	72.90	<.001	—d	
Mean follow-up duration (years)	
	≤10	9 (75)	0.61 (0.48-0.74)	38.43	79.20	<.001	Reference	
	>10	3 (25)	0.67 (0.52-0.82)	0.76	0	<.001	0.64	
Type of diabetes	
	Type 1	2 (17)	0.79 (0.45-1.12)	2.29	56.30	<.001	Reference	
	Type 2	10 (83)	0.60 (0.48-0.72)	35.42	74.60	<.001	0.25	
Duration of diabetes (years)	
	Not to mention	3 (25)	0.57 (0.40-0.75)	3.00	33.40	<.001	Reference	
	≤10	5 (42)	0.60 (0.43-0.77)	31.71	87.40	<.001	0.34	
	>10	4 (33)	0.71 (0.54-0.89)	3.28	8.50	<.001	0.98	
Mean age (years)	
	<60	6 (50)	0.60 (0.42-0.79)	15.61	68	<.001	Reference	
	≥60	6 (50)	0.64 (0.52-0.77)	16.63	68	<.001	0.77	
PA type	
	LTPAe	4 (33)	0.68 (0.52-0.83)	1.09	0	<.001	Reference	
	Total PA	8 (67)	0.61 (0.47-0.74)	38.03	81.60	<.001	0.55	
Men (%)	
	≤50	6 (50)	0.61 (0.48-0.74)	9.77	48.80	<.001	Reference	
	>50	6 (50)	0.62 (0.44-0.80)	30.66	83.70	<.001	0.88	
Validation of PA questionnaire	
	Yes	5 (42)	0.54 (0.43-0.65)	3.46	0	<.001	Reference	
	No	7 (58)	0.66 (0.51-0.82)	36.17	83.40	<.001	0.48	
Area	
	Asia	3 (25)	0.62 (0.38-0.87)	4.54	55.90	<.001	Reference	
	Europe	6 (50)	0.61 (0.44-0.79)	25.39	80.30	<.001	0.63	
	North America	2 (17)	0.54 (0.42-0.67)	0.13	0	<.001	0.49	
	Mixtures	1 (8)	0.81 (0.67-0.95)	0	–	<.001	0.68	
BMIf (kg/m2)	
	<25	2 (17)	0.90 (0.63-1.18)	0.45	0	.50	Reference	
	≥25	8 (67)	0.61 (0.50-0.72)	14.61	52.10	.04	0.31	
	≥30	2 (17)	0.55 (0.23-0.88)	18.01	94.40	<.001	0.35	
aRR: relative risk.

bPA: physical activity.

cMeta-regression: represents test for signiﬁcance of the study modiﬁcation across strata.

dNot available.

eLTPA: leisure-time physical activity.

fBMI: overweight is defined as BMI ≥25 kg/m2, and obese is defined as BMI ≥30 kg/m2.

Figure 3 Funnel plot assessing publication bias for the meta-analysis of prospective studies on the relationship between physical activity categories (the highest vs the lowest) and cardiovascular disease risk in individuals with diabetes. RR: relative risk.

Dose-Response Relationship Between PA and CVD Events and Mortality

Specific information regarding the studies included in the quantitative analysis is provided in Tables S6-S8 in Multimedia Appendix 1. The log RR of CVD events and mortality against weekly PA in terms of MET-hours in patients with diabetes are described in the linear and spline regression curves (Figure 4). The linear regression model results indicate that a 10 MET-hours per week incrementally higher PA was associated with a 19% (95% CI 11.6-25.7) and a 6.9% (95% CI 4.5-9.3) reduction in total CVD risk and risk of CVD mortality, respectively. The results of the spline regression analysis demonstrated that the relationship between PA and CVD morbidity and mortality was nonlinear (both Pnonlinearity<.001). While there was a limited reduction in the risk of total CVD as PA levels increased, there were additional reductions in the risk of CVD mortality beyond PA levels of 20 MET-hours per week.

Figure 4 Relationship between weekly PA and relative risk of (A) CVD events and (B) CVD mortality in individuals with diabetes. Spline regression curves depicting the relationship between PA and CVD risk are presented. The solid line represents a log-linear relationship, while the dashed lines indicate the upper and lower limits of the 95% CI. A distinct inflection point is observed at 20 MET-hours of movement per week. The graph exhibits an overall downward trend. CVD: cardiovascular disease; PA: physical activity.

Discussion

Overview

The global incidence of diabetes, particularly type 2 diabetes, is increasing annually. Patients with diabetes often experience multiple complications, and in severe cases, these complications can cause premature death [53]. Therefore, it is essential to actively guide patients with diabetes toward a healthy lifestyle, which includes regular PA, to prevent cardiovascular complications and other adverse outcomes [54,55]. A healthy lifestyle is inseparable from active exercise, essential for health promotion and well-being enhancement. Exercise plays an important role as a preventive strategy against various chronic diseases, including CVD, stroke, diabetes, osteoporosis, and obesity, and improves the quality of life in terms of mental health [56,57]. It is recommended that individuals with type 2 diabetes engage in regular PA and reduce their sedentary time by taking breaks between sedentary activities.

Principal Findings

This study aimed to synthesize evidence from prospective studies to elucidate the relationship between PA and CVD risk in patients with diabetes. The main finding of this study revealed a significant inverse correlation between regular PA and the risk of CVD in individuals with diabetes. These results align with previous studies that have shown the positive impact of exercise on glucose levels, β cell function, insulin sensitivity, vascular function, and gut microbiota, contributing to the healthy management of diabetes and reducing the risk of CVD [25].

The results of this study revealed that the trend of decreasing CVD morbidity and mortality slowed after the inflection point and leveled off with increasing PA. It is noteworthy that this slowing trend did not affect the positive effect of PA on CVD risk. Previous studies have suggested that the health effects of high doses of PA are not yet clear and may even be harmful to the cardiovascular system [58]. However, in this study, no negative effects were observed, and any amount of exercise was beneficial in reducing CVD risk for individuals with diabetes.

Limitations

This study has some limitations. First, in most of the included cohort studies, PA information was mainly obtained using questionnaires, which were differentially applied in different studies, and the findings may have been affected by the potential recall bias. Second, some studies included different end-point outcomes, such as CHD, CHD mortality, and stroke; however, we did not analyze them separately either qualitatively or quantitatively, due to the relatively small number of studies on these CVD subtypes. Third, only a few of the studies included in this review addressed leisure-time PA, and future studies may be needed to further elucidate the effects of specific types of PA on cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetes. Finally, the inclusion of different subtypes of diabetes among the study participants. Type 1 diabetes is typically characterized by autoimmune destruction of pancreatic β cells, resulting from the immune system attacking insulin-producing cells, and is associated with both genetic and environmental factors [59]. In contrast, type 2 diabetes is attributed to insulin resistance and inadequate insulin secretion, closely linked to obesity, unhealthy lifestyles, and genetic factors [60]. Therefore, variations in physiological and pathological profiles between the 2 types may lead to disparate cardiovascular responses to PA. However, according to previous studies, patients with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes benefit from engaging in appropriate exercise routines [57,61-65]. Consequently, we aim to analyze the overall health benefits of PA for all patients with diabetes. Although the FS3 results indicate that different types of diabetes are potential factors causing heterogeneity, they indeed demonstrate health benefits for both types of patients. Given this limitation, we intend to conduct future studies that are more tailored to different subtypes of patients with diabetes as much as possible.

Comparison to Prior Work

It is worth noting that while previous studies have explored the link between PA and CVD, this study takes a more focused approach to cardiovascular health [66-68]. We conducted thorough analyses, separately examining the risks of CVD and CVD mortality. Additionally, we included relevant research conducted from 2010 to the present, enhancing the timeliness of our findings. Therefore, our research retains significant clinical value.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated a dose-response relationship between increased PA and decreased risk of CVD morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes, particularly type 2 diabetes. The observed PA threshold was consistent with the recommended level for the general population, indicating that gradually increasing PA levels from a sedentary state to the recommended guidelines can significantly reduce the burden of CVD in patients with diabetes. These findings support the development and implementation of policies to promote PA among patients with diabetes, particularly those with type 2 diabetes.

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants 31971097 and 32271226), the Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Committee of Shanghai Outstanding Academic Leaders Plan (grant 21XD1403200), and the Humanities and Social Sciences Youth Fund of the Ministry of Education (grant 21YJC890030). RW and HT are cocorresponding authors of this paper.

Multimedia Appendix 1 Search strategy, study selection, confounders, bias assessment, data summary, subgroup analyses, and sensitivity analysis.

Abbreviations

CHD coronary artery heart disease

CVD cardiovascular disease

MET metabolic equivalent of task

PA physical activity

RR relative risk

Data Availability

The data sets generated and analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' Contributions: All the authors involved in drafting or revising the paper and approved of the submitted version. YC drafted the manuscript. HT, GC, and RW helped conceive the design and made edits and comments to the manuscript. YC, XJ, and GC carried out the literature search and helped in drafting the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
==== Refs
1 Armstrong DG Tan T Boulton AJM Bus SA Diabetic foot ulcers: a review JAMA 2023 330 1 62 75 10.1001/jama.2023.10578 37395769 2806655 37395769
2 Song SH Young-onset type 2 diabetes and retinopathy: evidence of an adverse phenotype BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 2024 12 1 e003899 10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003899 38167607 12/1/e003899
3 Tomkins M Lawless S Martin-Grace J Sherlock M Thompson C Diagnosis and management of central diabetes insipidus in adults J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2022 107 10 2701 2715 10.1210/clinem/dgac381 35771962 6623615 35771962
4 Sun H Saeedi P Karuranga S Pinkepank M Ogurtsova K Duncan BB Stein C Basit A Chan JC Mbanya JC Pavkov ME Ramachandaran A Wild SH James S Herman WH Zhang P Bommer C Kuo S Boyko EJ Magliano DJ IDF Diabetes Atlas: global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045 Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2022 183 109119 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109119 34879977 S0168-8227(21)00478-2 34879977
5 Blomster JI Chow CK Zoungas S Woodward M Patel A Poulter NR Marre M Harrap S Chalmers J Hillis GS The influence of physical activity on vascular complications and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus Diabetes Obes Metab 2013 15 11 1008 1012 10.1111/dom.12122 23675676 23675676
6 Campbell NR Ordunez P Giraldo G Rodriguez Morales YA Lombardi C Khan T Padwal R Tsuyuki RT Varghese C WHO HEARTS: a global program to reduce cardiovascular disease burden: experience implementing in the Americas and opportunities in Canada Can J Cardiol 2021 37 5 744 755 10.1016/j.cjca.2020.12.004 33310142 S0828-282X(20)31139-9 33310142
7 Poznyak A Grechko AV Poggio P Myasoedova VA Alfieri V Orekhov AN The diabetes mellitus-atherosclerosis connection: the role of lipid and glucose metabolism and chronic inflammation Int J Mol Sci 2020 21 5 1835 10.3390/ijms21051835 32155866 ijms21051835 32155866
8 Jung E Kong SY Ro YS Ryu HH Shin SD Serum cholesterol levels and risk of cardiovascular death: a systematic review and a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022 19 14 8272 10.3390/ijerph19148272 35886124 ijerph19148272 35886124
9 Jebari-Benslaiman S Galicia-García U Larrea-Sebal A Olaetxea JR Alloza I Vandenbroeck K Benito-Vicente A Martín C Pathophysiology of atherosclerosis Int J Mol Sci 2022 23 6 3346 10.3390/ijms23063346 35328769 ijms23063346 35328769
10 Wong ND Sattar N Cardiovascular risk in diabetes mellitus: epidemiology, assessment and prevention Nat Rev Cardiol 2023 20 10 685 695 10.1038/s41569-023-00877-z 37193856 10.1038/s41569-023-00877-z 37193856
11 Marx N Federici M Schütt K Müller-Wieland D Ajjan R Antunes M Christodorescu RM Crawford C Di Angelantonio E Eliasson B Espinola-Klein C Fauchier L Halle M Herrington WG Kautzky-Willer A Lambrinou E Lesiak M Lettino M McGuire DK Mullens W Rocca B Sattar N 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes Eur Heart J 2023 44 39 4043 4140 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad192 37622663 7238227 37622663
12 Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) World Health Organization 2021 2024-04-08 https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds)
13 World Heart Report 2023: confronting the world's number one killer World Heart Federation 2023 2024-04-08 https://heartreport23.world-heart-federation.org/
14 Barengo NC Antikainen R Borodulin K Harald K Jousilahti P Leisure-time physical activity reduces total and cardiovascular mortality and cardiovascular disease incidence in older adults J Am Geriatr Soc 2017 65 3 504 510 10.1111/jgs.14694 28024086 28024086
15 Martinez-Gomez D Cabanas-Sanchez V Yu T Rodriguez-Artalejo F Ding D Lee I Ekelund U Long-term leisure-time physical activity and risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: dose-response associations in a prospective cohort study of 210 327 Taiwanese adults Br J Sports Med 2022 56 16 919 926 10.1136/bjsports-2021-104961 35387777 bjsports-2021-104961 35387777
16 Saint-Maurice PF Coughlan D Kelly SP Keadle SK Cook MB Carlson SA Fulton JE Matthews CE Association of leisure-time physical activity across the adult life course with all-cause and cause-specific mortality JAMA Netw Open 2019 2 3 e190355 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0355 30848809 2727269 30848809
17 Watts EL Matthews CE Freeman JR Gorzelitz JS Hong HG Liao LM McClain KM Saint-Maurice PF Shiroma EJ Moore SC Association of leisure time physical activity types and risks of all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality among older adults JAMA Netw Open 2022 5 8 e2228510 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.28510 36001316 2795598 36001316
18 Levesque C Therapeutic lifestyle changes for diabetes mellitus Nurs Clin North Am 2017 52 4 679 692 10.1016/j.cnur.2017.07.012 29080584 S0029-6465(17)30088-9 29080584
19 Lavie CJ Arena R Swift DL Johannsen NM Sui X Lee D Earnest CP Church TS O'Keefe JH Milani RV Blair SN Exercise and the cardiovascular system: clinical science and cardiovascular outcomes Circ Res 2015 117 2 207 219 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.305205 26139859 CIRCRESAHA.117.305205 26139859
20 Olver TD Laughlin MH Padilla J Exercise and vascular insulin sensitivity in the skeletal muscle and brain Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2019 47 2 66 74 10.1249/JES.0000000000000182 30883470 00003677-201904000-00003 30883470
21 Qiu S Cai X Yin H Sun Z Zügel M Steinacker JM Schumann U Exercise training and endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis Cardiovasc Diabetol 2018 17 1 64 10.1186/s12933-018-0711-2 29720185 10.1186/s12933-018-0711-2 29720185
22 Huebschmann AG Huxley RR Kohrt WM Zeitler P Regensteiner JG Reusch JEB Sex differences in the burden of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular risk across the life course Diabetologia 2019 62 10 1761 1772 10.1007/s00125-019-4939-5 31451872 10.1007/s00125-019-4939-5 31451872
23 Sharma S Pelliccia A Gati S The 'ten commandments' for the 2020 ESC guidelines on sports cardiology and exercise in patients with cardiovascular disease Eur Heart J 2021 42 1 6 7 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa735 33180902 5979513 33180902
24 WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour World Health Organization 2020 2023-01-02 https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240015128
25 Jung I Kwon H Park SE Han KD Park YG Rhee EJ Lee WY Changes in patterns of physical activity and risk of heart failure in newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus patients Diabetes Metab J 2022 46 2 327 336 10.4093/dmj.2021.0046 34814381 dmj.2021.0046 34814381
26 Barakat A Williams KM Prevost AT Kinmonth A Wareham NJ Griffin SJ Simmons RK Changes in physical activity and modelled cardiovascular risk following diagnosis of diabetes: 1-year results from the ADDITION-Cambridge trial cohort Diabet Med 2013 30 2 233 238 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03765.x 22913463 22913463
27 Higgins JPT Thompson SG Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis Stat Med 2002 21 11 1539 1558 10.1002/sim.1186 12111919 12111919
28 DerSimonian R Laird N Meta-analysis in clinical trials Control Clin Trials 1986 7 3 177 188 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 3802833 0197-2456(86)90046-2 3802833
29 Van Itallie TB Health implications of overweight and obesity in the United States Ann Intern Med 1985 103 6 ( Pt 2) 983 988 10.7326/0003-4819-103-6-983 4062130 4062130
30 Egger M Davey Smith G Schneider M Minder C Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test BMJ 1997 315 7109 629 634 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 9310563 9310563
31 Sattelmair J Pertman J Ding EL Kohl HW Haskell W Lee IM Dose response between physical activity and risk of coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis Circulation 2011 124 7 789 795 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.010710 21810663 CIRCULATIONAHA.110.010710 21810663
32 Ainsworth BE Haskell WL Herrmann SD Meckes N Bassett DR Tudor-Locke C Greer JL Vezina J Whitt-Glover MC Leon AS 2011 Compendium of physical activities: a second update of codes and MET values Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011 43 8 1575 1581 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31821ece12 21681120 21681120
33 Liu X Zhang D Liu Y Sun X Han C Wang B Ren Y Zhou J Zhao Y Shi Y Hu D Zhang M Dose-response association between physical activity and incident hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies Hypertension 2017 69 5 813 820 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.08994 28348016 HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.08994 28348016
34 Smith AD Crippa A Woodcock J Brage S Physical activity and incident type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies Diabetologia 2016 59 12 2527 2545 10.1007/s00125-016-4079-0 27747395 10.1007/s00125-016-4079-0 27747395
35 Sterne JA Gavaghan D Egger M Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature J Clin Epidemiol 2000 53 11 1119 1129 10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00242-0 11106885 S0895-4356(00)00242-0 11106885
36 Funck KL Laugesen E Høyem P Fleischer J Cichosz SL Christiansen JS Hansen TK Poulsen PL Low physical activity is associated with increased arterial stiffness in patients recently diagnosed with type 2 diabetes Am J Hypertens 2016 29 7 882 10.1093/ajh/hpv197 26714500 hpv197 26714500
37 Minnebeck K Vorona E Zinn S Gellner R Hinder J Brand SM Kabar I Alten F Schmitz B Four weeks of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) improve the cardiometabolic risk profile of overweight patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) Eur J Sport Sci 2021 21 8 1193 1203 10.1080/17461391.2020.1810782 32790537 32790537
38 Glenn KR Slaughter JC Fowke JH Buchowski MS Matthews CE Signorello LB Blot WJ Lipworth L Physical activity, sedentary behavior and all-cause mortality among blacks and whites with diabetes Ann Epidemiol 2015 25 9 649 55 10.1016/j.annepidem.2015.04.006 26141652 S1047-2797(15)00215-X 26141652
39 Cirilli I Silvestri S Marcheggiani F Olivieri F Galeazzi R Antonicelli R Recchioni R Marcheselli F Bacchetti T Tiano L Orlando P Three months monitored metabolic fitness modulates cardiovascular risk factors in diabetic patients Diabetes Metab J 2019 43 6 893 897 10.4093/dmj.2018.0254 31339009 43.e40 31339009
40 Strelitz J Ahern AL Long GH Boothby CE Wareham NJ Griffin SJ Changes in behaviors after diagnosis of type 2 diabetes and 10-year incidence of cardiovascular disease and mortality Cardiovasc Diabetol 2019 01 18 1 98 10.1186/s12933-019-0902-5 31370851 10.1186/s12933-019-0902-5 31370851
41 Savory LA Griffin SJ Williams KM Prevost AT Kinmonth Al Wareham NJ Simmons RK Changes in diet, cardiovascular risk factors and modelled cardiovascular risk following diagnosis of diabetes: 1-year results from the ADDITION-Cambridge trial cohort Diabet Med 2014 31 2 148 10.1111/dme.12316 24102972 24102972
42 Brown RE Riddell MC Macpherson AK Canning KL Kuk JL All-cause and cardiovascular mortality risk in U.S. adults with and without type 2 diabetes: influence of physical activity, pharmacological treatment and glycemic control J Diabetes Complications 2014 28 3 311 315 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2013.06.005 23886620 S1056-8727(13)00146-3 23886620
43 Chen Y Su J Qin Y Luo P Shen C Pan E Lu Y Miao D Zhang N Zhou J Yu X Wu M Fresh fruit consumption, physical activity, and five-year risk of mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes: a prospective follow-up study Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2022 32 4 878 888 10.1016/j.numecd.2021.10.024 35078677 S0939-4753(21)00540-8 35078677
44 Enguita-Germán M Tamayo I Galbete A Librero J Cambra K Ibáñez-Beroiz B Effect of physical activity on cardiovascular event risk in a population-based cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021 18 23 12370 10.3390/ijerph182312370 34886096 ijerph182312370 34886096
45 Inoue K Mayeda ER Paul KC Shih IF Yan Q Yu Y Haan M Ritz BR Mediation of the associations of physical activity with cardiovascular events and mortality by diabetes in older Mexican Americans Am J Epidemiol 2020 189 10 1124 1133 10.1093/aje/kwaa068 32383448 5834357 32383448
46 Sone H Tanaka S Tanaka S Suzuki S Seino H Hanyu O Sato A Toyonaga T Okita K Ishibashi S Kodama S Akanuma Y Yamada N Leisure-time physical activity is a significant predictor of stroke and total mortality in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: analysis from the Japan Diabetes Complications Study (JDCS) Diabetologia 2013 56 5 1021 1030 10.1007/s00125-012-2810-z 23443242 23443242
47 Tielemans SMAJ Soedamah-Muthu SS De Neve M Toeller M Chaturvedi N Fuller JH Stamatakis E Association of physical activity with all-cause mortality and incident and prevalent cardiovascular disease among patients with type 1 diabetes: the EURODIAB Prospective Complications Study Diabetologia 2013 56 1 82 91 10.1007/s00125-012-2743-6 23052062 23052062
48 Tikkanen-Dolenc H Wadén J Forsblom C Harjutsalo V Thorn LM Saraheimo M Elonen N Rosengård-Bärlund M Gordin D Tikkanen HO Groop P Frequent and intensive physical activity reduces risk of cardiovascular events in type 1 diabetes Diabetologia 2017 60 3 574 580 10.1007/s00125-016-4189-8 28013340 10.1007/s00125-016-4189-8 28013340
49 Vepsäläinen T Soinio M Lehto S Juutilainen A Laakso M Rönnemaa T Proteinuria modifies the effects of physical activity on total and cardiovascular disease mortality rates in patients with type 2 diabetes Diabetologia 2010 53 9 1886 1889 10.1007/s00125-010-1812-y 20526577 20526577
50 Yen Y Wang C Chen Y Hsu L Hung K Chen L Ku P Chen C Lai Y Leisure-time physical activity and mortality risk in type 2 diabetes: a nationwide cohort study Diabetes Metab 2022 48 6 101378 10.1016/j.diabet.2022.101378 35872122 S1262-3636(22)00060-X 35872122
51 Yerramalla MS Fayosse A Dugravot A Tabak AG Kivimäki M Singh-Manoux A Sabia S Association of moderate and vigorous physical activity with incidence of type 2 diabetes and subsequent mortality: 27 year follow-up of the Whitehall II study Diabetologia 2020 63 3 537 548 10.1007/s00125-019-05050-1 31792574 10.1007/s00125-019-05050-1 31792574
52 Zethelius B Gudbjörnsdottir S Eliasson B Eeg-Olofsson K Cederholm J Swedish National Diabetes Register Level of physical activity associated with risk of cardiovascular diseases and mortality in patients with type-2 diabetes: report from the Swedish National Diabetes Register Eur J Prev Cardiol 2014 21 2 244 251 10.1177/2047487313510893 24227183 2047487313510893 24227183
53 MacPherson M Cranston K Locke S Vis-Dunbar M Jung ME Diet and exercise interventions for individuals at risk for type 2 diabetes: a scoping review protocol BMJ Open 2020 10 11 e039532 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039532 33203631 bmjopen-2020-039532
54 Karstoft K Pedersen BK Exercise and type 2 diabetes: focus on metabolism and inflammation Immunol Cell Biol 2016 94 2 146 150 10.1038/icb.2015.101 26568029 icb2015101 26568029
55 Turner G Quigg S Davoren P Basile R McAuley SA Coombes JS Resources to guide exercise specialists managing adults with diabetes Sports Med Open 2019 5 1 20 10.1186/s40798-019-0192-1 31161377 10.1186/s40798-019-0192-1 31161377
56 Villareal DT Aguirre L Gurney AB Waters DL Sinacore DR Colombo E Armamento-Villareal R Qualls C Aerobic or resistance exercise, or both, in dieting obese older adults N Engl J Med 2017 05 18 376 20 1943 1955 10.1056/NEJMoa1616338 28514618 28514618
57 Kanaley JA Colberg SR Corcoran MH Malin SK Rodriguez NR Crespo CJ Kirwan JP Zierath JR Exercise/physical activity in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a consensus statement from the American College of Sports Medicine Med Sci Sports Exerc 2022 54 2 353 368 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002800 35029593 00005768-202202000-00018 35029593
58 Rao P Hutter AM Baggish AL The limits of cardiac performance: can too much exercise damage the heart? Am J Med 2018 131 11 1279 1284 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.05.037 29958875 S0002-9343(18)30543-6 29958875
59 Gillespie KM Type 1 diabetes: pathogenesis and prevention CMAJ 2006 175 2 165 170 10.1503/cmaj.060244 16847277 175/2/165 16847277
60 Chatterjee S Khunti K Davies MJ Type 2 diabetes Lancet 2017 389 10085 2239 2251 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30058-2 28190580 S0140-6736(17)30058-2 28190580
61 Balducci S Sacchetti M Haxhi J Orlando G D'Errico V Fallucca S Menini S Pugliese G Physical exercise as therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2014 13 23 10.1002/dmrr.2514 24353273 24353273
62 Lu X Zhao C Exercise and type 1 diabetes Adv Exp Med Biol 2020 1228 107 121 10.1007/978-981-15-1792-1_7 32342453 32342453
63 McCarthy M Ilkowitz J Zheng Y Vaughan Dickson V Exercise and self-management in adults with type 1 diabetes Curr Cardiol Rep 2022 24 7 861 868 10.1007/s11886-022-01707-3 35524882 10.1007/s11886-022-01707-3 35524882
64 Riddell MC Peters AL Exercise in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus Nat Rev Endocrinol 2023 19 2 98 111 10.1038/s41574-022-00756-6 36316391 10.1038/s41574-022-00756-6 36316391
65 Sampath Kumar A Maiya AG Shastry B Vaishali K Ravishankar N Hazari A Gundmi S Jadhav R Exercise and insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2019 62 2 98 103 10.1016/j.rehab.2018.11.001 30553010 S1877-0657(18)31483-0 30553010
66 Garcia L Pearce M Abbas A Mok A Strain T Ali S Crippa A Dempsey PC Golubic R Kelly P Laird Y McNamara E Moore S de Sa TH Smith AD Wijndaele K Woodcock J Brage S Non-occupational physical activity and risk of cardiovascular disease, cancer and mortality outcomes: a dose-response meta-analysis of large prospective studies Br J Sports Med 2023 57 15 979 989 10.1136/bjsports-2022-105669 36854652 bjsports-2022-105669 36854652
67 Sluik D Buijsse B Muckelbauer R Kaaks R Teucher B Johnsen NF Tjønneland A Overvad K Ostergaard JN Amiano P Ardanaz E Bendinelli B Pala V Tumino R Ricceri F Mattiello A Spijkerman AMW Monninkhof EM May AM Franks PW Nilsson PM Wennberg P Rolandsson O Fagherazzi G Boutron-Ruault M Clavel-Chapelon F Castaño JMH Gallo V Boeing H Nöthlings U Physical activity and mortality in individuals with diabetes mellitus: a prospective study and meta-analysis Arch Intern Med 2012 172 17 1285 1295 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.3130 22868663 1307570 22868663
68 Wahid A Manek N Nichols M Kelly P Foster C Webster P Kaur A Friedemann Smith C Wilkins E Rayner M Roberts N Scarborough P Quantifying the association between physical activity and cardiovascular disease and diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis J Am Heart Assoc 2016 5 9 e002495 10.1161/JAHA.115.002495 27628572 JAHA.115.002495 27628572
