
==== Front
Nat Commun
Nat Commun
Nature Communications
2041-1723
Nature Publishing Group UK London

39223137
50165
10.1038/s41467-024-50165-8
Comment
Neurovascular coupling during hypercapnia in cerebral blood flow regulation
Gordon Grant R. gordong@ucalgary.ca

https://ror.org/03yjb2x39 grid.22072.35 0000 0004 1936 7697 Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1 Canada
2 9 2024
2 9 2024
2024
15 763617 6 2024
28 6 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Neuronal activity consumes cellular energy and generates carbon dioxide (CO2). To counter this metabolic challenge, synaptic signalling communicates with nearby microvasculature to increase local blood flow. Is this process solely based on feedforward synaptic signalling, or is the generated CO2 also involved? This question was addressed in mice in a new Nature Communications publication by Tournissac and colleagues where they showed that neurovascular coupling is not affected by exogenous CO2 or its associated acidification.

Subject terms

Neuro-vascular interactions
Neurology
issue-copyright-statement© Springer Nature Limited 2024
==== Body
pmcFunctional hyperemia is a type of neurovascular coupling, whereby enhanced neuronal activity initiates an increase in local cerebral blood flow to deliver more oxygen and glucose to working brain cells. This is a robust and reliable brain process that is the basis of several functional imaging techniques. Carbon dioxide (CO2) is equally, if not more, robust at increasing brain blood flow, in a process called hypercapnic hyperemia. Systemic hypercapnia, caused by breathing high CO2, breath holding, or many medical disorders, causes a global increase in brain blood flow when CO2 reaches the brain. As neuronal activity drives high rates of oxidative phosphorylation producing CO2, an important question is whether functional hyperemia makes use of metabolically elevated CO2 to increase local brain blood flow?

This is the topic of a new paper by Tournissac et al.1 published in Nature Communications. Another study on the same topic was published two years earlier in the same journal2. There, Hosford and colleagues showed that breathing elevated CO2 occluded functional hyperemia caused by sensory stimulation. The idea was to increase CO2 in the systemic blood supply and saturate any local CO2 control systems in the brain. The main method used to quantify cerebral blood perfusion was functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The conclusion was that hypercapnic hyperemia and functional hyperemia converge on the same cellular pathways, and that functional hyperemia relies on local CO2 generation to increase cerebral blood flow. In contrast, this new paper by Tournissac and colleagues uses a different approach with two-photon fluorescence vascular imaging and functional ultrasound but with the same technique to elevate brain CO2. They showed that the two types of cerebral blood flow responses were completely additive i.e. they did not occlude each other. The authors concluded that hypercapnic hyperemia and functional hyperemia operate through separate cellular pathways. Before we delve further into both papers, first some reflections.

Historically, functional hyperemia was viewed as a metabolic negative feedback loop3. Here, neuronal activation is met with the consumption of ATP and adenosine generation, drops in local oxygen and the production of CO2 to generate new ATP via oxidative phosphorylation. CO2 generation decreases pH due to the bidirectional reaction between CO2 + H2O and HCO3− + H+ which is facilitated by carbonic anhydrase. CO2, together with H+, is a potent vasodilator. Above a specific threshold, every 5 mmHg of CO2 elevation in arterial blood is met with a 50% increase in arterial blood velocity in humans4. Early on, CO2, along with adenosine and oxygen, were suspected to dilate the cerebral microvasculature, and once new energy substrates were replenished, homeostasis would be restored and cerebral blood flow would return to normal levels. However, work over the past 20 years has reshaped our understanding of neurovascular coupling. Our current model favours a feed-forward system, whereby glutamate synaptic signalling itself (and not the metabolic byproducts of its occurrence) initiates intracellular calcium-dependent cell cascades that generate vasoactive messengers that diffuse from synapses and glial processes to vascular contractile cells to dilate microvasculature and increase blood flow5. Nature may have favoured such as system because glutamate signalling is energy intensive6. Perhaps it is faster and more efficient to signal directly to blood vessels, as opposed to waiting for a negative feedback system to work. However, the brain may not save time by ignoring metabolic by products. Functional hyperemia takes approximately 1 sec to manifest in vivo, which is plenty of time for pH to change and metabolites to rise in the extracellular parenchyma from enhanced neuronal activity7. Furthermore, such metabolites could act independent of the feedforward glutamate system, or be intertwined within that signalling network. Arguing for independent action, experiments blocking multiple feedforward neurovascular coupling pathways cannot completely eliminate functional hyperemia8,9, suggesting other, possibly metabolic pathways, have a role in neurovascular coupling. Arguing for intertwined mechanisms, multiple blockers of the feedforward glutamate-mediated system, such as nitric oxide synthase and cyclooxygenases antagonists, also block hypercapnia hyperemia10,11. This raises the questions, do functional and hypercapnic hyperemia mechanisms converge on the same cellular pathways? When functional hyperemia occurs in the brain, is local CO2 production and its action on cells in the neurovascular unit a key mechanism in neurovascular coupling? These questions were not carefully address in rodents in vivo, until Tournissac et al. and Hosford et al. Sparse evidence from humans looking at the middle cerebral artery with transcranial doppler shows a similar effect to Hosford, that in the presence of hypercapnia, motor movement induced functional hyperemia is compromised12, but this study provided no controls for ceiling effects. Though Tournissac and colleagues and Hosford and colleagues came to opposite conclusions, we need to take a closer look.

In Tournissac et al. they employed continuous 10% or 10 sec of 20% CO2 inhalation and a combination of two-photon imaging of microcirculatory blood flow in the barrel cortex or functional ultrasound for both regional and whole brain measurements. The authors examined arteriole diameter and RBC velocity at different points in the vascular tree. They also measured intravascular pH changes to the CO2 challenge and intracellular calcium signals in different cell types of the neurovascular unit. They showed that brief, high CO2 exposure leads to reversible acidification of the blood plasma and all cells in the neurovascular unit occurring 3–4 seconds prior to a transient arteriole dilation (hypercapnic hyperemia). The authors used this time lag to study if functional hyperemia, triggered by whisker stimulation in mice, is affected by either the early CO2 induced acidification, or by the hypercapnic hyperemia itself. They found that neither the acidification, nor CO2-mediated arteriole dilation, affected the amplitude of functional hyperemia. A strength of the work was a detailed look at the timing of all these events and the experimental alignment of their occurrences to test if the responses were additive or not. In addition to these timing experiments, they also show that in the presence of continual hypercapnia, capillary RBC movements and regional blood velocity increases in response to whisker stimulation are largely unaffected. Overall, a convincing study showing that functional and hypercapnic hyperemia operate independently from one another, but what did the previous work show?

In the Hosford et al. paper, cerebral blood perfusion was measured with fMRI in rats. Arterial spin labelling was used to measure quantitative global and regional blood perfusion of the brain, and the blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) response was employed to detect relative changes in the oxy/de-oxy hemoglobin ratio which increases in the somatosensory cortex when blood vessels dilated to functional stimulation. Electrical forepaw stimulation was used to evoke neurovascular coupling. Inspiring elevated CO2 increased global brain blood flow, and 10% CO2 nearly completely occluded functional hyperemia. The authors then showed that functional hyperemia depended on the sodium bicarbonate co-transporter (NCBe1) in astrocytes using a cre-lox knockout. Due to the equilibrium between CO2 and bicarbonate, this transporter was an interesting target to explore. As with the Tournissac et al. work, the Hosford et al. study used state-of-the-art approaches, and was well controlled. How was this opposite result achieved?

While both impressive papers, proving that two pathways do or do not interact through an occlusion test is challenging because one or both pathways need to be near maximally activated. For example, even if functional and hypercapnic hyperemia converge on a common cell pathway, if each is only activating that pathway to 25% of maximal, then it should be expected that both together would generate a 50% response—no occlusion. Tournissac et al. appears to use a submaximal neurovascular coupling response with a relatively strong (but still likely not maximal), hypercapnic response. Thus, it is unclear if occlusion is possible to observe under these conditions. Nevertheless, their results clearly show that the two pathways do not interact at the chosen level of their stimulations. Yet, using maximal responses is also difficult as one needs to control for ceiling effects. A 100% of maximal CO2-mediated dilation may leave little room for further dilation to other stimuli, and in such a scenario one cannot conclude that two pathways are apart of a shared mechanism. Hosford et al. attempted to tackle these issues. To control for a blood flow ceiling effect in high CO2, the authors provided stronger forepaw stimulation to show that blood flow can still be partially boosted. Separately, they administered systemic vasoconstrictors, which brought cerebral blood perfusion back down, yet functional hyperemia to moderate or strong sensory stimulation was still largely occluded during hypercapnia. Furthermore, the vasoconstrictors did not block functional hyperemia in normocapnic conditions. This latter result though was surprising, that the constrictor indomethacin, which blocks cyclooxygenase and has been reported to reduce functional hyperemia13, did not impact sensory induced fMRI signals in their hands.

The primary measurements employed in each paper are different. While both are related to cerebral blood perfusion, the relative and quantitative fMRI techniques used by Hosford have relatively low spatiotemporal resolution and low SNR. Tournissac et al. instead measured arteriole diameter and RBC movements with 2-photon and blood velocity with functional ultrasound. Could it be that measuring different blood flow parameters is the reason for one study seeing occlusion of functional and hypercapnic hyperemia and the other not? While there is a direct relationship between all these measurement modalities and cerebral blood perfusion14, BOLD imaging is less sensitive at detecting changes compared to functional ultrasound and two-photon imaging14. Thus, it is likely that the Hosford and colleagues’ protocol would inherently require more intense and longer duration types of sensory stimulation. Given the arguments above that near maximal pathway activation may be necessary to see an occlusion between two processes, Hosford and colleagues’ experiments may be able to see this interaction, whereas Tournissac and colleagues’ not. But is Hosford and colleagues’ observation physiologically relevant? It remains unclear.

In Hosford et al., unnatural, electrical forepaw stimulation is used. While this method was confirmed to activate sensory Aβ fibers by observing repeatable synaptic field potentials and fMRI signals in the forepaw sensory region, the activation of other ascending fibers was not ruled out and they may have been recruited15. Either way, a more natural type of sensory stimulus is needed to better understand if/how functional and hypercapnic hyperemic responses interact. In Tournissac et al. the authors show that the neuronal GCaMP signal driving neurovascular coupling is not different in the presence of CO2 acidification – an important control. However, GECI fluorescence is highly sensitive to pH, which affects the dynamic range of the sensor16, making this control less clear. Elevating brain CO2 is expected to decrease neuronal excitability2,17, which is a issue for both papers. In Tournissac et al.’s case, one can ask why does CO2 not affect functional hyperemia strictly due to synaptic depression? In Hosford’s case, one can ask if this explains their main result because whenever there is high CO2 in their experiments, functional hyperemia is occluded (though the authors did rule out the involvement of decreased pH itself). Furthermore, to perform the in vivo experiments, Tournissac et al. employed the sedative dexmedetomidine, whereas Hosford et al. used α-chloralose anesthetic. This is suboptimal as all anesthetics/sedatives affect cerebral blood flow regulation in some way, either by acting directly on vascular control pathways, or indirectly via changes to neuronal activity and/or brain metabolism18. A future approach could be the use of miniscopes to measure microcirculatory changes in a freely behaving animal19, while in a gas-controlled chamber. This should be technically feasible and would be an interesting experimental platform to test the hypothesis.

Tournissac et al. did not explore cellular mechanisms and the author’s conclusions would be even stronger if, for example, hypercapnic vasodilation could be reduced or eliminated by blocking a specific signalling pathway, which then had no effect on functional hyperemia. While we know that NOS and COX blockers affect both responses, it would take the uncovering of new mechanisms to clarify this idea. Here, Hosford et al. demonstrated a CO2-related mechanism in astrocytes mediating functional hyperemia via the NCBe1. However, this was tested in an atypical neurovascular coupling preparation – a direct, invasive tissue oxygen measurement using fast cyclic voltammetry. It is necessary that the NCBe1 target be tested with other measurement techniques, such as fMRI and the methods used by Tournissac et al.

Concluding remarks

The field needs to decide on how to further test the hypothesis. For a start, anesthetics/sedatives should be harmonized or eliminated, and a range of natural sensory stimulation intensities and durations must be tested (e.g., Tournissac and colleagues use stronger/longer stimulations, while Hosford and colleagues using weaker/shorter stimulations), and at least one micro and one meso/macro imaging modality (e.g. 2-photon and fMRI) should be employed on the same mouse. Resolving this will be important to improve our understanding of cerebral blood flow regulation, and to provide a framework for how to interpret combined functional and hypercapnic stimulations in the lab or the clinic using functional imaging techniques.

Acknowledgements

G.R.G. was supported by the University of Calgary, Canada.

Author contributions

G.R.G. wrote and edited the manuscript.

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. Tournissac, M. et al. Neurovascular coupling and CO2 interrogate distinct vascular regulations. Nat. Commun. 10.1038/s41467-024-49698-9 (2024).
2. Hosford PS CO2 signaling mediates neurovascular coupling in the cerebral cortex Nat. Commun. 2022 13 2125 10.1038/s41467-022-29622-9 35440557
Hosford, P. S. et al. CO2 signaling mediates neurovascular coupling in the cerebral cortex. Nat. Commun. 13, 2125 (2022).35440557 10.1038/s41467-022-29622-9
3. Roy CS Sherrington CS On the regulation of the blood-supply of the brain J. Physiol. 1890 11 85 158.17 10.1113/jphysiol.1890.sp000321 16991945
Roy, C. S. & Sherrington, C. S. On the regulation of the blood-supply of the brain. J. Physiol. 11, 85–158.17 (1890).16991945 10.1113/jphysiol.1890.sp000321
4. Battisti-Charbonney A Fisher J Duffin J The cerebrovascular response to carbon dioxide in humans J. Physiol. 2011 589 3039 3048 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.206052 21521758
Battisti-Charbonney, A., Fisher, J. & Duffin, J. The cerebrovascular response to carbon dioxide in humans. J. Physiol. 589, 3039–3048 (2011).21521758 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.206052
5. Mishra A Gordon GR MacVicar BA Newman EA Astrocyte regulation of cerebral blood flow in health and disease Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2024 16 a041354 10.1101/cshperspect.a041354 38316553
Mishra, A., Gordon, G. R., MacVicar, B. A. & Newman, E. A. Astrocyte regulation of cerebral blood flow in health and disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 16, a041354 (2024).38316553 10.1101/cshperspect.a041354
6. Howarth C Gleeson P Attwell D Updated energy budgets for neural computation in the neocortex and cerebellum J. Cereb. Blood Flow. Metab. 2012 32 1222 1232 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.35 22434069
Howarth, C., Gleeson, P. & Attwell, D. Updated energy budgets for neural computation in the neocortex and cerebellum. J. Cereb. Blood Flow. Metab. 32, 1222–1232 (2012).22434069 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.35
7. Makani S Chesler M Rapid rise of extracellular pH evoked by neural activity is generated by the plasma membrane calcium ATPase J. Neurophysiol. 2010 103 667 676 10.1152/jn.00948.2009 19939954
Makani, S. & Chesler, M. Rapid rise of extracellular pH evoked by neural activity is generated by the plasma membrane calcium ATPase. J. Neurophysiol. 103, 667–676 (2010).19939954 10.1152/jn.00948.2009
8. Peng X Zhang C Alkayed NJ Harder DR Koehler RC Dependency of cortical functional hyperemia to forepaw stimulation on epoxygenase and nitric oxide synthase activities in rats J. Cereb. Blood Flow. Metab. 2004 24 509 517 10.1097/00004647-200405000-00004 15129182
Peng, X., Zhang, C., Alkayed, N. J., Harder, D. R. & Koehler, R. C. Dependency of cortical functional hyperemia to forepaw stimulation on epoxygenase and nitric oxide synthase activities in rats. J. Cereb. Blood Flow. Metab. 24, 509–517 (2004).15129182 10.1097/00004647-200405000-00004
9. Golanov EV Reis DJ Nitric oxide and prostanoids participate in cerebral vasodilation elicited by electrical stimulation of the rostral ventrolateral medulla J. Cereb. Blood Flow. Metab. 1994 14 492 502 10.1038/jcbfm.1994.61 8163592
Golanov, E. V. & Reis, D. J. Nitric oxide and prostanoids participate in cerebral vasodilation elicited by electrical stimulation of the rostral ventrolateral medulla. J. Cereb. Blood Flow. Metab. 14, 492–502 (1994).8163592 10.1038/jcbfm.1994.61
10. Xu HL Koenig HM Ye S Feinstein DL Pelligrino DA Influence of the glia limitans on pial arteriolar relaxation in the rat Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2004 287 H331 H339 10.1152/ajpheart.00831.2003 14962837
Xu, H. L., Koenig, H. M., Ye, S., Feinstein, D. L. & Pelligrino, D. A. Influence of the glia limitans on pial arteriolar relaxation in the rat. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 287, H331–H339 (2004).14962837 10.1152/ajpheart.00831.2003
11. Zhang Y Leffler CW Compensatory role of NO in cerebral circulation of piglets chronically treated with indomethacin Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2002 282 R400 R410 10.1152/ajpregu.00256.2001 11792649
Zhang, Y. & Leffler, C. W. Compensatory role of NO in cerebral circulation of piglets chronically treated with indomethacin. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 282, R400–R410 (2002).11792649 10.1152/ajpregu.00256.2001
12. Maggio P Salinet ASM Panerai RB Robinson TG Does hypercapnia-induced impairment of cerebral autoregulation affect neurovascular coupling? A functional TCD study J. Appl. Physiol. 2013 115 491 497 10.1152/japplphysiol.00327.2013 23743398
Maggio, P., Salinet, A. S. M., Panerai, R. B. & Robinson, T. G. Does hypercapnia-induced impairment of cerebral autoregulation affect neurovascular coupling? A functional TCD study. J. Appl. Physiol. 115, 491–497 (2013).23743398 10.1152/japplphysiol.00327.2013
13. Bakalova R Matsuura T Kanno I The cyclooxygenase inhibitors indomethacin and rofecoxib reduce regional cerebral blood flow evoked by somatosensory stimulation in rats Exp. Biol. Med. 2002 227 465 473 10.1177/153537020222700710
Bakalova, R., Matsuura, T. & Kanno, I. The cyclooxygenase inhibitors indomethacin and rofecoxib reduce regional cerebral blood flow evoked by somatosensory stimulation in rats. Exp. Biol. Med. 227, 465–473 (2002).10.1177/153537020222700710
14. Boido D Mesoscopic and microscopic imaging of sensory responses in the same animal Nat. Commun. 2019 10 1110 10.1038/s41467-019-09082-4 30846689
Boido, D. et al. Mesoscopic and microscopic imaging of sensory responses in the same animal. Nat. Commun. 10, 1110 (2019).30846689 10.1038/s41467-019-09082-4
15. Koga K Selective activation of primary afferent fibers evaluated by sine-wave electrical stimulation Mol. Pain. 2005 1 13 10.1186/1744-8069-1-13 15813963
Koga, K. et al. Selective activation of primary afferent fibers evaluated by sine-wave electrical stimulation. Mol. Pain. 1, 13 (2005).15813963 10.1186/1744-8069-1-13
16. van der Linden FH A turquoise fluorescence lifetime-based biosensor for quantitative imaging of intracellular calcium Nat. Commun. 2021 12 7159 10.1038/s41467-021-27249-w 34887382
van der Linden, F. H. et al. A turquoise fluorescence lifetime-based biosensor for quantitative imaging of intracellular calcium. Nat. Commun. 12, 7159 (2021).34887382 10.1038/s41467-021-27249-w
17. Dulla CG Adenosine and ATP link PCO2 to cortical excitability via pH Neuron 2005 48 1011 1023 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.11.009 16364904
Dulla, C. G. et al. Adenosine and ATP link PCO2 to cortical excitability via pH. Neuron 48, 1011–1023 (2005).16364904 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.11.009
18. Slupe AM Kirsch JR Effects of anesthesia on cerebral blood flow, metabolism, and neuroprotection J. Cereb. Blood Flow. Metab. 2018 38 2192 2208 10.1177/0271678X18789273 30009645
Slupe, A. M. & Kirsch, J. R. Effects of anesthesia on cerebral blood flow, metabolism, and neuroprotection. J. Cereb. Blood Flow. Metab. 38, 2192–2208 (2018).30009645 10.1177/0271678X18789273
19. Ghosh KK Miniaturized integration of a fluorescence microscope Nat. Methods 2011 8 871 878 10.1038/nmeth.1694 21909102
Ghosh, K. K. et al. Miniaturized integration of a fluorescence microscope. Nat. Methods 8, 871–878 (2011).21909102 10.1038/nmeth.1694
