
==== Front
Cureus
Cureus
2168-8184
Cureus
2168-8184
Cureus Palo Alto (CA)

10.7759/cureus.66078
Other
Medical Education
Structured Online Systematic Review Training for Medical Students: An Elective Module in Physiology
Muacevic Alexander
Adler John R
Chaudhuri Arunima 12
Deb Roy Asitava 13
Manivasakan Shivasakthy 1
Mondal Himel 4
1 Institute of Health Professions Education, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth, Puducherry, IND
2 Department of Physiology, Burdwan Medical College and Hospital, Bardhaman, IND
3 Department of Pathology, Mata Gujri Memorial Medical College, Kishanganj, IND
4 Department of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Deoghar, Deoghar, IND
Himel Mondal himelmkcg@gmail.com
3 8 2024
8 2024
16 8 e660782 8 2024
Copyright © 2024, Chaudhuri et al.
2024
Chaudhuri et al.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
This article is available from https://www.cureus.com/articles/280791-structured-online-systematic-review-training-for-medical-students-an-elective-module-in-physiology
Background

Recently, elective posting has been introduced by the National Medical Commission (NMC) of India in the undergraduate competency-based medical education (CBME) curriculum. To successfully implement it in medical colleges, facilitators (medical teachers) need to commit extra time. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of online teaching-learning methods for implementing an elective module for undergraduate medical students at Burdwan Medical College and Hospital, West Bengal, India.

Methods

An online module for systematic review methods was developed using the Delphi method. This module was used to train 30 medical students divided into six groups. One resident and one faculty facilitated each group. After the elective program of 15 days, program feedback and evaluation using the Kirkpatrick model were obtained from the students.

Results

A total of 30 undergraduate medical students with a mean age of 22.7±0.95 years participated in the study. All of them successfully conducted a systematic review per group. The students' feedback was 86.33% positive, and the project evaluation showed an 84% positive opinion. The highest score was for understanding, facilitators' knowledge, and experience. The lowest score was for the immediate applicability of the knowledge.

Conclusion

An online systematic review training module can be used for elective teaching-learning for final-year medical students, particularly within limited time and resource constraints. Students appreciated the module's clear objectives, appropriate complexity, and facilitators' expertise, leading to improved communication, engagement, and critical-thinking skills. Despite some limitations, these findings suggest that online learning can complement traditional methods and address logistical challenges in medical education, warranting further research on its long-term impact and broader applicability.

competency-based medical education
national medical commission (nmc)
mbbs student
training module
research writing
medical student
undergraduate student research
online module
systematic review
electives
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Electives are a vital component of undergraduate medical education, offering numerous benefits that contribute to the development of competent, compassionate, and well-rounded physicians [1]. They enhance the educational experience by providing opportunities for exploration, skill development, personalized learning, and professional growth. Recently, electives have been introduced by the National Medical Commission in the MBBS undergraduate competency-based medical education curriculum [2].

By experiencing different specialties, students can make more informed decisions about their future careers. Electives provide opportunities to develop a wide range of skills, from clinical techniques to research methodologies. Students can tailor their education to their interests and career goals, making their medical training more relevant and engaging [3,4].

Research experience helps students appreciate the importance of evidence-based medicine, which is crucial for making informed clinical decisions. Conducting research can lead to publications in medical journals and presentations at conferences, which are valuable for academic and professional growth. It provides opportunities to collaborate with experienced researchers and clinicians, fostering professional relationships [5-7]. However, medical students often face significant challenges in managing their time, especially when it comes to balancing electives with regular coursework [8,9]. In our institution, these students are allotted only 15 days for electives, from 2:00 to 4:00 p.m., while still attending their regular classes. This limited timeframe puts immense pressure on students, making it difficult to fully engage in elective modules that are crucial for their professional development. Additionally, the faculty members' availability is constrained during this period, as many are occupied with first-year students' practical classes. This scarcity of faculty resources further complicates the scheduling and delivery of elective sessions [10]. Given these constraints, conducting teaching and learning activities online presents a viable solution that benefits both faculty and students.

In this context, we designed a structured online systematic review training module for final-year medical students during their elective period in the Department of Physiology. The main objective was to evaluate the impact of online teaching-learning methods for implementing an elective module for undergraduate medical students.

Materials and methods

Study design and participants

This study was conducted on 30 MBBS students from the 2021-2022 batch, posted in the Department of Physiology, Burdwan Medical College and Hospital, West Bengal, India, during their elective sessions of one month. Institutional ethical clearance was obtained (BMC/IEC/159 dated June 3, 2024), and informed consent was secured from all participants. Students were assigned to the Department of Physiology based on their roll numbers, as per the college authorities' decision. A total of 15 students were allotted to the department for 15 days, and in the next 15 days, another 15 students were allotted. The overall study procedure is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1 Brief study process

Module development and topic selection

A systematic review module was developed by five faculty members using Delphi rounds and validated two months before the commencement of the study. Experts in medical education reviewed the module to ensure its relevance and rigor. The topics for systematic reviews were selected by senior faculty members, with significant input from students. The chosen topics were as follows: leadership styles and skills among undergraduate medical students, professionalism and ethics in medical education, academic leadership in medical education, use of social media in medical education, virtual reality and augmented reality in medical education, and ethical perspectives of the use of artificial intelligence in medical education.

Group formation and leadership

Students were randomly divided into six groups (three groups for 15 days and three groups for the next 15 days), each led by a resident (i.e., a postgraduate (PG) student). Faculty members continuously supervised group activities to ensure proper guidance and adherence to the module. Three faculty members from the institution and three from external institutions acted as facilitators, with necessary administrative approvals obtained beforehand.

Training and supervision

PG residents were initially sensitized to systematic reviews during journal club sessions. They then introduced the concept to the undergraduate (UG) students under faculty supervision. Faculty members provided three systematic review articles for the PG residents to present in journal clubs. Doubt-clearing sessions were conducted via Zoom, while WhatsApp, Google Groups, and email facilitated ongoing interactions.

Systematic review process

Each large group (five students) began by defining the objectives and inclusion/exclusion criteria for their systematic review. They independently searched for and downloaded relevant articles, which were then screened according to the predefined criteria. Faulty designs were excluded with the help of supervising faculty members. Students prepared Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flowcharts and posted them in the WhatsApp group for facilitator feedback.

Article evaluation and consensus building

Students evaluated the downloaded articles based on a checklist covering various aspects such as title, study location, participant number, inclusion/exclusion criteria, sampling technique, study objectives, type of self-directed learning (SDL) used, study duration, data acquisition technique, evaluation tools, results, strengths, and limitations. Each group reached a consensus and posted their findings in the WhatsApp group for faculty review and further modification.

Feedback and program evaluation

At the module's conclusion, feedback was collected from the students on a self-administered questionnaire developed and face-validated by six experts. The questionnaire has 10 statements with agree and disagree closed-ended response options. The program was evaluated by another 15-item questionnaire formulated according to the Kirkpatrick model [11].

Data analysis

Data were presented in numbers. Percentages were not calculated as the sample was below 100. The categorical data were compared by a binomial test where significance indicates that the occurrence did not happen by chance. We used free online tools for statistical analysis according to the guidance by Mondal et al. [12]. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 30 undergraduate medical students with a mean age of 22.7±0.95 years participated in the study. All six groups could formulate objectives, decide on inclusion and exclusion criteria, determine the search strategies, write methodologies for the search of the literature of the systematic reviews, prepare PRISMA flow charts, download articles from the databases, review articles, and analyze them according to the guidelines provided. Their feedback regarding the module is shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Feedback from the students regarding the online elective module on systematic review

Statement	Response	p-value	
Agree	Disagree	
The online module gave me a greater opportunity to communicate with other students as there were no geographical and time constraints.	29	1	<0.0001	
The online module was more engaging than the offline sessions for review of the literature.	21	9	0.02	
I am more comfortable with online activities for literature review than the offline sessions and I feel that it is more convenient.	27	3	<0.0001	
More topics should be covered using this educational model.	28	2	<0.0001	
The online elective module has increased my confidence in literature review and the knowledge that I have gained will be applied in research activities in the future.	25	5	0.0002	
I am motivated to learn research activities in online mode.	23	7	0.0026	
The online module has improved my learning of literature review.	22	8	<0.0001	
The flipped classroom has improved my problem-solving skills and critical-thinking skills.	28	2	<0.0001	
The online module has helped me to more effectively apply my knowledge of literature review.	26	4	<0.0001	
I am satisfied with the overall learning experience.	30	0	-	
Overall (sum of 10 attributes/10)	25.9	4.1	-	

The evaluation of the online systematic review training module for medical students revealed a highly positive reception. Students appreciated the enhanced communication opportunities without geographical and time constraints and found the online sessions more engaging and convenient than traditional offline methods. They expressed a strong desire for more topics to be covered using this educational model and reported increased confidence and motivation in conducting literature reviews and research activities. The flipped classroom approach was particularly effective in improving their problem-solving and critical-thinking skills, leading to an overall high level of satisfaction with the learning experience.

The students also evaluated the program, and their evaluation of various aspects of the program is shown in Table 2.

Table 2 Program evaluation according to the Kirkpatrick model

Evaluation Category	Response	p-value	
Agree	Disagree	
The objectives were clearly defined for this program	29	1	<0.0001	
The objectives were covered by facilitators	28	2	<0.0001	
The materials were of the right level of complexity for my background	25	5	0.0002	
I understood the learning objectives of the elective	30	0	-	
I was able to relate the learning objectives to my learning experience	20	10	0.049	
I faced appropriate challenges with the material	25	5	0.0002	
The course materials of the elective module were well-organized	28	2	<0.0001	
I found the module easy to navigate	23	7	0.0026	
I felt that the lesson I learned would be essential for my success	29	1	<0.0001	
The module was relevant to my needs	28	2	<0.0001	
I will be immediately able to apply the knowledge that I have gained	2	28	<0.0001	
The facilitators had a good understanding of the systematic review process	30	0	-	
The facilitator shared his/ her experience regarding the conduction of a systematic review	30	0	-	
My learning was enhanced by the knowledge and guidance of the facilitator	26	4	<0.0001	
My learning was enhanced by the experiences on systematic review shared by the facilitator	25	5	0.0002	
Overall (sum of 15 attributes/15)	37.8	7.2	-	

The evaluation of the elective module suggests clarity and relevance of the program's objectives, which were well-covered by facilitators. The materials were generally deemed appropriate in complexity and well-organized, although some students found the module challenging to navigate. The facilitators' deep understanding and experience with systematic reviews greatly enhanced students' learning. While most students found the lessons essential for their success and immediately relevant, a significant number felt unprepared to apply the knowledge gained right away. Overall, the module was positively received, with facilitators' guidance playing a crucial role in the learning process.

Discussion

The evaluation of the online systematic review training module for final-year medical students revealed positive feedback. Students appreciated the clear definition and coverage of objectives, the appropriate complexity of materials, and the relevance of the module to their educational needs. They particularly valued the facilitators' expertise and the organization of the course materials. However, while the module was well-received in terms of enhancing communication, engagement, and problem-solving skills, some students felt unprepared to immediately apply the knowledge gained from the module.

The positive reception of the online module can be attributed to several key factors. Maybe the flexibility of online learning allowed students to engage with the material without the constraints of location and time, which is particularly beneficial given their busy schedules and limited time for electives [13-15]. The well-structured content and the use of experienced facilitators helped create a supportive learning environment. Additionally, the use of interactive platforms such as Zoom and WhatsApp facilitated continuous communication and feedback, enhancing the overall learning experience [16,17].

A study conducted by Pathipati and Taleghani in 2016 revealed that medical students may not be interested in research during their undergraduate course. Hence, the authors suggested that stakeholders should enhance the reward for research [18]. In our study, the electives are part of the medical curriculum, and we trained them for a systematic review that requires fewer resources than original research work. Another study by Murdoch-Eaton et al. found that while undergraduate students recognize the importance of research experience, they need practical and in-depth understanding [19]. In our study, we found that the developed model to teach systematic review was well accepted by the students. Hence, the same can be helpful for undergraduate research training in other centers. The detailed module can be obtained from the first author of the article.

The implications of this study are substantial for medical education. The success of the online module suggests that similar approaches could be adopted for other elective courses, especially in contexts where time and resource constraints are significant. Moreover, the positive outcomes related to communication, engagement, and critical-thinking skills highlight the potential of online learning to complement traditional educational methods [20]. Future research should explore the long-term impact of such modules on students' professional development and their ability to apply learned skills in clinical practice.

This study has several limitations. The sample size was small, comprising only 30 students from a single MBBS batch, which may not be representative of the broader student population. The reliance on self-reported data introduces potential biases, and the short duration of 15 days may not have been sufficient for students to fully adapt to the online learning environment. Additionally, the absence of a control group limits the ability to compare the online module's effectiveness against traditional methods. Variability in students' access to technology and internet quality could have affected their engagement and performance. Finally, focusing on a single department and specific topics restricts the generalizability of the findings to other areas of medical education. When designing studies in the future, researchers should take into account these limitations and incorporate strategies to address them in order to obtain a more generalized result.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates the potential of online systematic review training modules to effectively enhance the learning experience for final-year medical students, particularly under the constraints of limited time and resources. The module was well-received, with students appreciating the clear objectives, the appropriate complexity of materials, and the facilitators' expertise. The flexibility and convenience of online learning, combined with interactive and well-organized content, significantly improved communication, engagement, and critical-thinking skills. Despite the limitations, these findings suggest that online learning can complement traditional educational methods, offering a viable solution to logistical challenges in medical education. Future research should aim to address the identified limitations and explore the long-term impact and broader applicability of such online modules in various medical fields.

We thank all the faculty members, residents, and students for their active participation in this study. We also thank the support of the Institute of Health Professions Education, Puducherry, for the help extended for the completion of this project for the Masters in Health Professions Education program. We used the ChatGPT language model (OpenAI, San Francisco, California) (access date July 20, 2024) to edit the language and grammar of the manuscript. After editing, the content was rechecked for accuracy and relevancy.

Disclosures

Author Contributions

Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Institutional Ethics Committee of Burdwan Medical College, Burdwan, West Bengal issued approval BMC/IEC/159.

Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.

Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Concept and design:  Himel Mondal, Arunima Chaudhuri, Asitava Deb Roy, Shivasakthy Manivasakan

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Himel Mondal, Arunima Chaudhuri, Asitava Deb Roy, Shivasakthy Manivasakan

Drafting of the manuscript:  Himel Mondal, Arunima Chaudhuri, Asitava Deb Roy, Shivasakthy Manivasakan

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Himel Mondal, Arunima Chaudhuri, Asitava Deb Roy, Shivasakthy Manivasakan

Supervision:  Himel Mondal, Arunima Chaudhuri
==== Refs
References

1 Structured medical electives: a concept whose time has come? Global Health Willott C Khair E Worthington R Daniels K Clarfield AM 84 15 2019 31796093
2 Electives in undergraduate health professions training: opportunities and utility Med J Armed Forces India Mahajan R Singh T 0 5 77 2021
3 The clinical elective course and its effects on medical students and graduates of Jordanian medical schools BMC Med Educ Al-Taher R Al-Ani R Al-Ani A 716 22 2022 36221086
4 Medical education electives can promote teaching and research interests among medical students Adv Med Educ Pract Arja SB Arja SB Ponnusamy K Kottath Veetil P Paramban S Laungani YC 173 180 15 2024 38469135
5 Undergraduate research elective under competency-based medical education (CBME) in India: challenges and directions Indian J Psychol Med Chatterjee S Kar SK 548 551 45 2023 37772135
6 Medical students' perceptions of an undergraduate research elective Med Teach Houlden RL Raja JB Collier CP Clark AF Waugh JM 659 661 26 2004 15763861
7 Science Scholars: integrating scientific research into undergraduate medical education through a comprehensive student-led preclinical elective MedEdPORTAL Svoboda M Kamal Y Pinto-Powell R 11144 17 2021 33889723
8 Barriers experienced by medical students in conducting research at undergraduate level Cureus Kumar J Memon A Kumar A Kumari R Kumar B Fareed S 0 11 2019
9 Integrating research into the undergraduate curriculum: 3. Research training in the upper-level neuroscience curriculum J Undergrad Neurosci Educ Chase L McMurray M Stavnezer AJ Buffalari D Fernandes JJ Lom B Morrison ME 0 88 19 2020 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8040832/
10 Acute shortage of teachers in medical colleges: existing problems and possible solutions Natl Med J India Ananthakrishnan N 25 29 20 2007 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17557520/ 17557520
11 The Kirkpatrick model: a useful tool for evaluating training outcomes J Intellect Dev Disabil Smidt A Balandin S Sigafoos J Reed VA 266 274 34 2009 19681007
12 Conduct common statistical tests online Indian Dermatol Online J Mondal H Mondal S Majumder R De R 539 542 13 2022 36262562
13 Advantages, limitations and recommendations for online learning during COVID-19 pandemic era Pak J Med Sci Mukhtar K Javed K Arooj M Sethi A 0 31 36 2020
14 Online teaching in medical training: establishing good online teaching practices from cumulative experience Int J Appl Basic Med Res Saiyad S Virk A Mahajan R Singh T 149 155 10 2020 33088735
15 The role of E-content development in medical teaching: how far have we come? Cureus Bankar MN Bankar NJ Singh BR Bandre GR Shelke YP 0 15 2023
16 A comparative analysis of perceived advantages and disadvantages of online learning Behav Sci (Basel) Pikhart M Klimova B Cierniak-Emerych A Dziuba S 262 13 2023 36975287
17 Benefits of an online interactive educational program over traditional textbooks Nurse Educ Phillips BC Johnson J Khalid N Zapparrata N Albright G 270 275 48 2023 36881473
18 Research in medical school: a survey evaluating why medical students take research years Cureus Pathipati AS Taleghani N 0 8 2016
19 What do medical students understand by research and research skills? Identifying research opportunities within undergraduate projects Med Teach Murdoch-Eaton D Drewery S Elton S 0 60 32 2010
20 The e-Learning effectiveness versus traditional learning on a health informatics laboratory course Stud Health Technol Inform Zogas S Kolokathi A Birbas K Chondrocoukis G Mantas J 109 112 226 2016 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27350479/ 27350479
