
==== Front
J Orthop Surg Res
J Orthop Surg Res
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
1749-799X
BioMed Central London

39218944
5024
10.1186/s13018-024-05024-z
Research Article
Special-form radial collateral artery perforator flaps for the reconstruction of complex hand defects
Xiong Yu
Xiong Qin
Qing Li-Ming
Wu Pan-Feng
Tang Ju-Yu
Yu Fang yufang_csu@126.com

grid.216417.7 0000 0001 0379 7164 Department of Hand and Microsurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410000 China
2 9 2024
2 9 2024
2024
19 53330 6 2024
20 8 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Background

The reconstruction of complex wounds of the hand still has challenges in achieving aesthetic, functional and sensory recovery. We presented our experience of using the polyfoliate and chimeric radial collateral artery perforator flaps (RCAPF) to repair complex hand defects, aiming to explore the feasibility of special-form RCAPFs in hand coverage and enhance the comprehension of their respective indications.

Methods

From June 2014 to March 2021, 26 cases (19 males and 7 females, mean 44.4 years) underwent defect and sensation reconstruction of their hands with special-form RCAPFs, which manifested as multiple adjacent or irregular single wounds and composite tissue defects complicated with a degree of nerve injury. The clinical effects of the free RCAPFs were evaluated by integrating the postoperative and long-term follow-up outcomes of all cases.

Results

Altogether 8 polyfoliate flaps, 17 chimeric flaps and 1 polyfoliate-chimeric flap were harvested. Of them, 23 flaps survived uneventfully in one stage. Venous congestion occurred in 3 cases, two of which survived through vascular exploration and another one was finally repaired by the contralateral RCAPF. The follow-up results showed that the appearance of both the recipient and donor sites mostly recovered satisfactory. All the bone flaps properly healed. The BMRC sensory evaluation results of all skin flaps were S4 in 8 flaps, S3 in 18 flaps, and S2 in 9 flaps.

Conclusions

The free RCAPFs can be designed in various forms with a reliable blood supply, contributing to reconstructing simple and multiple wounds of the hand with or without bone defects and dead space.

Keywords

Radial collateral artery perforator flap
Polyfoliate flap
Chimeric flap
Hand
Reconstruction
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004735 Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province 2023JJ30967 Clinical Medical Technology Innovation Guidance Program of Hunan Province2020SK53708 issue-copyright-statement© BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

The lateral arm flap (LAF) is primarily used to cover small to moderate defects in the upper extremity as well as the head and neck with a reliable vascular pedicle [1–3]. Besides, not only can it reconstruct composite soft tissue and bone defects by carrying a humeral segment or triceps tendon, but also it can achieve sensory recovery [4, 5]. With its reliability, versatility as well as similar color and texture to the hand, the free LAF is considered as an alternative to other free flaps in repairing the wounds of the hand [6]. However, traditional LAF is usually bulky and its width for harvesting is limited [7, 8]. It’s also challenging to harvest its attached flaps when ensuring the normal blood supply and reducing the waste of the donor tissue [9, 10].

Compared with the traditional LAF, the radial collateral artery perforator flap (RCAPF) preserves the nourishing perforators and carries neither the deep fascia nor the muscle, which makes it less bulky and also alleviates the damage to the donor site [11, 12]. With the popularization of perforator flaps, they have been further improved into several special forms to achieve more individual, three-dimensional and minimally invasive wound reconstruction [13–15]. Accordingly, the polyfoliate flap corresponds to more than two of the same type perforator flaps harvested in one perforasome and is often used for simultaneous repair of two or more adjacent wounds [16, 17]. The chimeric flap consists of multiple independent tissue flaps such as skin flap, muscle flap, bone flap and fascial flap with a common pedicle, which can be used to reconstruct the wounds combined with dead space or other tissue defects [18, 19].

Given the characteristics of the RCAPFs, we designed several special-form flaps to repair some complex hand defects that were difficult for one-stage reconstruction. Our study was conducted to explore the feasibility of the special-form RCAPFs in hand coverage and enhance the comprehension of their respective indications.

Methods

Patients

From June 2014 to March 2021, 26 patients (19 males and 7 females) aged from 23 to 63 years (mean 44.4 years) underwent defect and sensation reconstruction of their hands with polyfoliate and chimeric RCAPFs, manifesting as multiple adjacent or irregular single wounds and composite tissue defects all complicated with the exposure of deep tissue and a degree of nerve injury.

There were 10 cases of wounds located in the left hand and 16 in the right hand, including 21 in the digits and the first web, 4 in the dorsum and 1 in the palm of the hand. Of all patients, 15 cases had both skin and phalanx defects of the thumb. Nearly a half of wounds were caused by crushing injury, and the others resulted from post-traumatic infection, traffic accident, high-pressure injection, electrical injury, etc. (Details in Table 1).

Table 1 Detailed data of the patients

Case	Gender
/Age(Y)	Causes	Site of Defects	Size of Skin
Flaps(cm)	Size of Bone
Flaps(cm)	Recipient
Vessels	Complications	Follow-up
(M)	Hand Function	Sensory
Recovery	
1	M/50	Traffic Accident	Hand Dorsum-R	5 × 4; 6 × 3	—	RA`/CV	None	7	Excellent	S4; S4	
2	M/27	Crush Injury	Thumb and First Web-R	8 × 4; 8.5 × 4	—	RA/CV	None	10	Good	S3; S3	
3	M/55	High Pressure Injection	Hand Dorsum-L	8.5 × 5; 11 × 4.5	—	RA`/CV	None	36	Good	S3; S3	
4	M/37	High Pressure Injection	Hand Dorsum-R	9 × 4; 9.5 × 4	—	RA`/CV	None	17	Excellent	S4; S3	
5	M/28	Crush Injury	Middle and Ring Fingers-R	5.5 × 4; 3.5 × 6	—	CDA-II/DDV	None	18	Excellent	S3; S3	
6	M/50	Hot Crush Injury	Index, Middle and Ring Fingers-L	6 × 5; 7 × 4	—	CDA-II/DDV	None	13	Excellent	S3; S3	
7	M/30	Electrical Injury	Forearm and Palm-L	9 × 4; 10 × 3.5	—	RA/RV	None	7	Poor	S2; S2	
8	F/30	Burn Injury	Index and Middle Fingers-L	4 × 6; 4 × 8	—	RA/RV+DMV	VC	5	Good	S2; S2	
9	M/45	Post-traumatic Osteomyelitis	Thumb-L	5 × 2.5	2.5 × 1	RA`/CV	None	76	Good	S3	
10	M/47	Post-traumatic Osteomyelitis	Thumb-L	4 × 2	1.5 × 0.6	RA/RV	None	55	Excellent	S4	
11	M/37	Crush Injury	Thumb-R	7 × 4	2 × 1	RA`/CV	None	4	Excellent	S4	
12	M/50	Crush Injury	Thumb-R	9 × 4	2 × 1	PPDA/SV	None	8	Excellent	S3	
13	M/51	Chainsaw Injury	Thumb-R	10 × 4	2.5 × 1	RA`/CV	None	25	Excellent	S4	
14	M/63	Avulsion	Thumb-L	18 × 5	2 × 1	RA`/CV	None	11	Excellent	S2	
15	M/23	Traffic Accident	Hand Dorsum-R	11 × 5	5 × 2*	RA`/CV	None	37	Excellent	S4	
16	M/39	Crush Injury	Thumb-L	9.5 × 4	2 × 0.6	RA`/CV	None	29	Excellent	S4	
17	F/46	Crush Injury	Thumb-L	10 × 5	3 × 1	RA`/CV	None	17	Excellent	S3	
18	F/52	Post-traumatic Osteomyelitis	Thumb-R	6.5 × 2.5	2 × 1	RA`/CV	None	15	Excellent	S3	
19	M/52	Crush Injury	Thumb-R	6 × 5	2 × 1	RA/RV	None	14	Excellent	S3	
20	F/50	Crush Injury	Thumb-R	6 × 3.5	2.5 × 1	RA/RV	VC	14	Good	S2	
21	F/54	Cut Injury	Thumb-R	8 × 4	1.5 × 1	PPA/DDV	None	7	Excellent	S3	
22	M/47	Electrical Injury	Thumb and First Web-R	8 × 5; 8 × 6.5	3.5 × 1	RA/RV	VC	8	Good	S2; S2	
23	F/50	Crush Injury	Thumb-R	12 × 5	4 × 1	RA/RV	None	10	Good	S2	
24	F/34	Post-traumatic Infection	Middle Finger-R	5 × 2	3 × 1	CDA-II/DDV	None	9	Excellent	S3	
25	M/51	Traffic Accident	Index Finger-R	12 × 6	2 × 1*	RA/RV	None	5	Excellent	S3	
26	M/57	Crush Injury	Thumb-L	7 × 4	1.5 × 1	RA`/CV	None	5	Excellent	S3	
M, male; F, female; R, right hand; L, left hand; RA, radial artery; RA`, radial artery at the snuff box; CV, cephalic vein; CDA-II, the second common digital artery; DDV, dorsal digital vein; RV, radial vein; DMV, dorsal metacarpal vein; PPDA, proper palmar digital artery; SV, superficial vein; PPA, princeps pollicis artery; *, muscle flap; VC, venous congestion

All the operations were performed by the same team. This study followed the Ethics Committee guidelines of Xiangya Hospital, and all the patients have signed the informed consent.

Operative technique

After thoroughly removing the necrotic tissue, a paper template was prepared in accordance with the size and shape of the wound. It was cut and then spliced to guide the design of the skin paddles. The size of bone defect and the area of dead space were also measured for the design of an appropriate-sized bone flap or muscle flap. To ensure the direct closure of the donor site defect, a skin pinch test could be performed to evaluate the maximum available width of the flap. A line was drawn to connect the deltoid insertion and the lateral epicondyle of the humerus, which marked the lateral intermuscular septum (LIS) and the axis of the flap as well. The perforators were identified preoperatively by a hand-held Doppler along with this line (Fig. 1A).

Fig. 1 Diagram of the polyfoliate and chimeric radial collateral artery perforator flaps (RCAPF) (A) the axis of flap; (B) identified septocutaneous perforators; (C) polyfoliate RCAPF (double skin paddles); (D) chimeric RCAPF (humeral segment); (E) chimeric RCAPF (triceps)

An aseptic tourniquet was used for flap dissection. The first step was to incise perpendicularly through the skin and adipose tissue. In the suprafascial plane, the incision was performed in an anterior direction, until reaching the LIS and identifying the septocutaneous perforators from the posterior branch of the radial collateral artery (PBRCA; Fig. 1B). After dissociating the targeted perforators, the deep fascia was dissected, followed by the exposure of the PBRCA. In addition, the periosteal branches of the PBRCA that supplied the distal lateral humerus were divided to harvest a bone flap, while the branches to the triceps were identified to dissect a muscle flap (Fig. 1C, D, E).

After that, the anterior edge of the flap was incised, and then the flap was elevated from distal to proximal to dissociate the pedicle which must be separated from the radial nerve carefully. After confirming the reliable blood supply of the flap, the radial collateral artery (RCA) and its venae comitantes were ligated and then cut ultimately. The posterior cutaneous nerve of the forearm and the radial nerve should be protected and retained in the donor site. Comparatively, the posterior cutaneous nerve of the arm was carried in the flap for a further sensory reconstruction.

After transferring the flap into the recipient site, the RCA and its venae comitantes were respectively anastomosed with the corresponding artery and its venae comitantes or the cephalic vein (Table 1). The posterior cutaneous nerve of the arm could be anastomosed with the cutaneous nerve of the recipient site. The bone segment was fixed to the phalanx or the metacarpal in the site of bone defect by Kirschner wires or a plate, while the muscle flap was used to fill the dead space and prevent infection. The donor site was closed directly after complete hemostasis and drainage.

Postoperative treatments

The blood supply of the flap needed to be monitored hourly during the first 3 days and every 4 h for 4 to 7 days after operation, including the color, temperature, extent of swelling and capillary refill. Besides, anticoagulation was routinely provided with subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin sodium (4000 IU/day) for a week. The injured hand was also generally immobilized for a week, followed by active flexion and extension of the affected digits.

Regular follow-ups at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 months after operation were performed to observe the appearance and texture of the flap as well as the wound healing conditions. The sensory recovery was evaluated by the sensory grading method formulated by the British Medical Research Council (BMRC) in the last follow-up, while the function of thumb opposition and the ranges of motion of the remaining four fingers were also checked.

Results

The size of skin defects ranged from 3.0 cm × 1.5 cm to 10.0 cm × 9.5 cm, and the size of bone defects was from 1.5 cm × 0.6 cm to 4.0 cm × 1.0 cm. Altogether 35 skin flaps, 16 bone flaps and 2 muscle flaps were harvested, amounting to 8 polyfoliate flaps, 17 chimeric flaps and 1 polyfoliate-chimeric flap. The total area of polyfoliate RCAPFs with two skin paddles was from 38 to 92 cm2, and the area of the skin paddles in the chimeric RCAPFs was from 8 to 90 cm2.

There were 23 flaps surviving uneventfully in one stage. Venous congestion occurred in 3 of 26 cases at 24 h after operation, two of which survived completely after an emergent vascular exploration, whereas another one became necrotic due to a late exploration, therefore repaired with the contralateral RCAPF in a second operation. The vascular intimal injury secondary to the severe traumas induced the thrombosis of the anastomosis, which was responsible for the venous congestion of these 3 cases.

The follow-up duration lasted from 4 months to 6.3 years (mean 17.8 months). The appearance and texture of the flaps were mostly satisfactory. Sensory recovery achieved S4 in 8 flaps, S3 in 18 flaps, S2 in 9 flaps. Approximately 70% of patients showed an excellent hand function. All the bone flaps properly healed without nonunion and deformity. All the donor sites healed without any complications and only remained a linear scar (Table 1).

Case reports

Case 3

A 55-year-old male suffered a high-pressure injection injury, resulting in the soft tissue defects of the dorsum of the left hand. The extensor tendons were partially exposed, and the ring finger was completely necrotic. After a complete debridement and ring finger osteotomy, a polyfoliate RCAPF was designed for the coverage of a 9.5 cm × 10.0 cm-sized skin defect and the exposed tendons. The sizes of two skin paddles were respectively 8.5 cm × 5.0 cm and 11.0 cm × 4.5 cm. After completely harvesting the flap, the distal paddle was rotated 180 degrees and sutured with the proximal paddle side by side to cover the wound. The RCA and its venae comitantes were anastomosed with the radial vessels and the cephalic vein at the snuff box in an end-to-end manner. The donor site was closed directly. The flap survived without any complications. After 3 years of follow-up, the recipient and donor sites recovered well, and the sensory recovery of two skin paddles were both S3 (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2 Case 3 (A) Wound after debridement and ring finger osteotomy; (B) Design of polyfoliate flap; (C) Complete free flaps; (D) Stitching flaps according to design; (E) Wound covered by flaps; (F) Direct-closed donor site

Case 15

A 23-year-old male admitted to our hospital with a 10.0 cm × 4.5 cm-sized wound of the right hand caused by a traffic accident. We designed a chimeric RCAPF with a muscle flap to cover the exposed extensor tendons and simultaneously fill the dead space. The size of the skin flap was 11.0 cm × 5.0 cm, and the size of the muscle flap was 5.0 cm × 2.0 cm. The RCA and its venae comitantes were anastomosed with the radial vessels and the cephalic vein at the snuff box in an end-to-end manner. The chimeric flap survived uneventfully without any infection. Followed up for 3 years, the appearance of the right hand was satisfactory, and the sensory recovery of the flap achieved S4. The donor site healed primarily with a linear scar (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3 Case 15 (A) Wound after debridement; (B) Design of chimeric flap; (C) Complete free flaps; (D) Wound covered by flaps; (E) Appearance of donor site and recipient site at 3 months after operation; (F) Appearance of recipient site after 3 years of follow-up

Case 17

A 46-year-old female suffered from a crushing injury, leading to both the skin and bone defects of the left thumb. We found a 3 cm-long phalanx loss and a 9.0 cm × 4.5 cm-sized skin defect of the thumb after a thorough debridement. And then a chimeric RCAPF with a humeral flap was transferred to reconstruct the thumb. The size of the skin flap was 10.0 cm × 5.0 cm, and the size of the bone segment was 3.0 cm × 1.0 cm which was fixed to the proximal phalanx with a plate. The RCA and its venae comitantes were anastomosed with the radial vessels and the cephalic vein at the snuff box in an end-to-side manner. After 17 months of follow-up, the bone flap healed and achieved a radiologic union. The sensation of the flap returned to S3, and both the shape and function of the thumb was almost restored (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4 Case 17 (A) A 3 cm-long phalanx defect of left thumb after debridement; (B) Harvested chimeric flap; (C) Recipient site after operation; (D, E) Dorsal view and palmar view of the recipient site after 17 months of follow-up after operation; (F) X-ray showed the bone flap with a plate

Discussion

The reconstruction of complex wounds of the hand still has challenges in achieving aesthetic, functional and sensory recovery [20]. The skin grafts, pedicled flaps and free flaps are usually used for wound coverage, some of which cannot meet such an overall requirement [6, 20]. The LAF was first presented by Song et al. [21] in 1982 as a septocutaneous flap. Subsequently, there were lots of anatomical studies and clinical reports demonstrating that it could reconstruct composite defects and sensation as a versatile flap [1, 4, 5]. Combined that with its color, texture and available amount of tissue, the free LAF is considered suitable for repairing small to moderate defects of the hand [6]. However, with the deep fascia and subcutaneous tissue involved, traditional LAF was too bulky and often needed a second-thinning procedure [7]. There were also excessive fascia and septum retained to ensure a reliable blood supply for the bone flap [3, 22].

The RCAPF, a perforator flap optimized from the LAF, is characterized by only preserving the perforators and carrying neither the deep fascia nor the muscle. The perforator propeller flap was usually rotated to cover the defects of the elbow [11, 23], whereas the free flap was mostly used to repair wounds of the hand as well as the head and neck [12, 19]. Generally, traditional perforator flaps still have limitations in repairing more complex and extensive wounds. In order to maximize the normal appearance and function of both the recipient and donor sites, they have been developed into several special forms such as polyfoliate, chimeric, microdissected, flow-through and conjoined flaps and the corresponding derivatives, contributing to the precise reconstruction of such complex defects and minimizing the damage to the donor site [13–16].

The RCA mainly derives from the profounda brachii artery and continues to divide into one posterior and one anterior branch. The PBRCA eventually anastomoses with the radial recurrent artery around the lateral epicondyle of the humerus. Crucially, the PBRCA travels through the LIS where it gives off 3 to 5 septocutaneous perforators to supply the LAF [1, 22, 24, 25]. And it has also been found that the PBRCA provides muscular branches and one group of direct periosteal branches to respectively supply the triceps and the lateral humerus [22]. Haas et al. [5] described that the constant branches to the humerus were found 3 to 6 cm proximal to the lateral epicondyle. The PBRCA simultaneously gives off reliable cutaneous, periosteal, muscular and fascial perforators [4, 9, 26], and there is a constant pedicle which can be extended more proximally for a longer length and a larger caliber [3, 12], laying the foundation for the design of special-form RCAPFs with several skin paddles or other tissue flaps.

Except for the above anatomical characteristics, the RCAPF still has many other advantages. Like the traditional LAF, the ipsilateral upper arm can be chosen as the donor site, avoiding a position adjustment during the operation. The posterior cutaneous nerve of the arm carried in the flap can provide sensory innervation to the skin of the recipient site [1, 27]. Furthermore, the RCAPF carries neither the deep fascia nor the muscle and the adipose tissue can be thinned as needed [19], which is the most distinctive difference from the traditional fasciocutaneous and myocutaneous flaps, ensuring the aesthetics of the recipient site and diminishing the donor site morbidity. The dominant vessels are not involved in the free RCAPF transfer, and the pedicle and perforators of this flap are constant and relatively easy to be dissected [3].

Through anastomosing one group of source vessel, the special-form perforator flaps with two or more tissue flaps can reconstruct complex hand defects in one-stage procedure. For the optimized polyfoliate RCAPF, it can be divided into several skin paddles to cover the multiple adjacent or multi-digital defects [17, 27]. The design of converting the flap width to the length not only helps to cover the irregular wounds more flexibly, but also allows for direct closure of the donor site defect, thereby avoiding a second-stage skin grafting or damaging the second donor site [12]. Comparatively, the chimeric flap can repair complex wounds complicated with phalanx or metacarpal defects, tendon injuries and dead space formation, realizing three-dimensional reconstruction of composite tissue defects of the hand. Each of the tissue flaps has an independent perforator with a little soft tissue cuff attached, which can increase the mobility between them [19].

It should be emphasized that the RCAPF is harvested from the outside of the upper arm and hence is not applicable to all the patients due to the individual difference of skin hairiness and thickness of the upper arm. Compared with the anterolateral thigh flap and the parascapular flap, the RCAPF is also not suitable for repairing large and extensive wounds, on account of the limited area of the donor site [6, 28]. Sensory disorders such as numbness and paresthesia may occur in the distribution area of posterior cutaneous nerves owing to the division of them [7, 28]. Sometimes the caliber of the pedicle is relatively small, which is not conductive to the microvascular anastomosis, therefore the pedicle needs be divided more proximally to the level of the profounda brachii artery [12]. Moreover, it requires higher anatomical and microanastomosis ability for the operators to perform the free RCAPF transfer and avoid the twisting of the pedicle.

What’ more, it is found that the RCAPF has a consistent blood supply from the PBRCA, and the venous drainage mainly depends on its venae comitantes. Hence, the cephalic vein is generally not necessary to be carried in the RCAPF to improve its vein drainage [29]. In Regard to the selection of recipient vessel, the branch of radial artery at the snuff box is beneficial to the anastomosis with the RCA because of its relatively small caliber. Besides, it is essential to get a sense of the latent damage of such severe traumas to the recipient vessels. And the rigorous monitoring of the blood supply of the flap and timely exploration are also vital to the prevention of vascular compromise.

The limitations in this study firstly involve the absence of postoperative evaluation standards for the hand function and objective assessment of the aesthetic outcomes. Whether the appearance and texture of the flap is satisfactory depends upon the subjective judgement of the surgeons. Secondly, there is a lack of control group and strict inclusion and exclusion criteria for this retrospective case series, which indeed requires to be taken into consideration for further case-control studies.

Conclusions

The free RCAPFs can be designed in various forms with a reliable blood supply. In one perforasome, the polyfoliate RCAPF can be designed to repair multiple adjacent or irregular single wounds of the hand, whereas the chimeric flap can reconstruct the phalanx loss and eliminate the dead space when covering the skin defect simultaneously. The clinical applications of the special-form RCAPFs will be of great significance for the reconstruction of complex hand defects.

Abbreviations

LAF lateral arm flap

LIS lateral intermuscular septum

PBRCA posterior branch of the radial collateral artery

RCA radial collateral artery

RCAPF radial collateral artery perforator flap

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the patients for their participation in our study.

Author contributions

YX and FY contributed to the design of the work. YX and QX participated the acquisition and analysis of data. YX wrote the first draft of the manuscript. LQ, PW, JT, and FY supervised this study and revised the manuscript critically. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province [grant number 2023JJ30967] and the Clinical Medical Technology Innovation Guidance Program of Hunan Province [grant number 2020SK53708].

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval to report these cases was obtained from Hospital Ethical Committee of the Xiangya Hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for their anonymized information to be published in this article.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. Katsaros J Schusterman M Beppu M Banis JC Jr Acland RD The lateral upper arm flap: anatomy and clinical applications Ann Plast Surg 1984 12 6 489 500 10.1097/00000637-198406000-00001 6465806
Katsaros J, Schusterman M, Beppu M, Banis JC Jr., Acland RD. The lateral upper arm flap: anatomy and clinical applications. Ann Plast Surg. 1984;12(6):489–500.6465806 10.1097/00000637-198406000-00001
2. Marques Faria JC Rodrigues ML Scopel GP Kowalski LP Ferreira MC The versatility of the free lateral arm flap in head and neck soft tissue reconstruction: clinical experience of 210 cases J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008 61 2 172 9 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.10.035 18042444
Marques Faria JC, Rodrigues ML, Scopel GP, Kowalski LP, Ferreira MC. The versatility of the free lateral arm flap in head and neck soft tissue reconstruction: clinical experience of 210 cases. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;61(2):172–9.18042444 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.10.035
3. Kokkalis ZT Papanikos E Mazis GA Panagopoulos A Konofaos P Lateral arm flap: indications and techniques Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2019 29 2 279 84 10.1007/s00590-019-02363-0 30649619
Kokkalis ZT, Papanikos E, Mazis GA, Panagopoulos A, Konofaos P. Lateral arm flap: indications and techniques. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019;29(2):279–84.30649619 10.1007/s00590-019-02363-0
4. Katsaros J Tan E Zoltie N Barton M Venugopalsrinivasan Venkataramakrishnan. Further experience with the lateral arm free flap Plast Reconstr Surg 1991 87 5 902 10 10.1097/00006534-199105000-00015 2017499
Katsaros J, Tan E, Zoltie N, Barton M, Venugopalsrinivasan. Venkataramakrishnan. Further experience with the lateral arm free flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;87(5):902–10.2017499 10.1097/00006534-199105000-00015
5. Haas F Rappl T Koch H Pittler P Scharnagl E Free osteocutaneous lateral arm flap: anatomy and clinical applications Microsurgery 2003 23 2 87 95 10.1002/micr.10112 12740878
Haas F, Rappl T, Koch H, Pittler P, Scharnagl E. Free osteocutaneous lateral arm flap: anatomy and clinical applications. Microsurgery. 2003;23(2):87–95.12740878 10.1002/micr.10112
6. Sauerbier M Germann G Giessler GA Sedigh Salakdeh M Döll M The free lateral arm flap-a reliable option for reconstruction of the forearm and hand Hand (N Y) 2012 7 2 163 71 10.1007/s11552-012-9395-3 23730235
Sauerbier M, Germann G, Giessler GA, Sedigh Salakdeh M, Döll M. The free lateral arm flap-a reliable option for reconstruction of the forearm and hand. Hand (N Y). 2012;7(2):163–71.23730235 10.1007/s11552-012-9395-3
7. Graham B Adkins P Scheker LR Complications and morbidity of the donor and recipient sites in 123 lateral arm flaps J Hand Surg Br 1992 17 2 189 92 10.1016/0266-7681(92)90086-H 1588201
Graham B, Adkins P, Scheker LR. Complications and morbidity of the donor and recipient sites in 123 lateral arm flaps. J Hand Surg Br. 1992;17(2):189–92.1588201 10.1016/0266-7681(92)90086-H
8. Kuek LB Chuan TL The extended lateral arm flap: a new modification J Reconstr Microsurg 1991 7 3 167 73 10.1055/s-2007-1006775 1890673
Kuek LB, Chuan TL. The extended lateral arm flap: a new modification. J Reconstr Microsurg. 1991;7(3):167–73.1890673 10.1055/s-2007-1006775
9. Gosain AK Matloub HS Yousif NJ Sanger JR The composite lateral arm free flap: vascular relationship to triceps tendon and muscle Ann Plast Surg 1992 29 6 496 507 10.1097/00000637-199212000-00004 1466545
Gosain AK, Matloub HS, Yousif NJ, Sanger JR. The composite lateral arm free flap: vascular relationship to triceps tendon and muscle. Ann Plast Surg. 1992;29(6):496–507.1466545 10.1097/00000637-199212000-00004
10. Chen HC el-Gammal TA The lateral arm fascial free flap for resurfacing of the hand and fingers Plast Reconstr Surg 1997 99 2 454 9 10.1097/00006534-199702000-00021 9030154
Chen HC, el-Gammal TA. The lateral arm fascial free flap for resurfacing of the hand and fingers. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99(2):454–9.9030154 10.1097/00006534-199702000-00021
11. Murakami M Ono S Ishii N Hyakusoku H Reconstruction of elbow region defects using radial collateral artery perforator (RCAP)-based propeller flaps J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012 65 10 1418 21 10.1016/j.bjps.2012.03.013 22548764
Murakami M, Ono S, Ishii N, Hyakusoku H. Reconstruction of elbow region defects using radial collateral artery perforator (RCAP)-based propeller flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65(10):1418–21.22548764 10.1016/j.bjps.2012.03.013
12. Wang WM Sun L Yang SS Hu SJ Zuo YJ Min AJ Comparison between modified lateral arm free flap and traditional lateral arm free flap for the Reconstruction of oral and maxillofacial soft tissue defects Front Oncol 2022 12 877799 10.3389/fonc.2022.877799 35692763
Wang WM, Sun L, Yang SS, Hu SJ, Zuo YJ, Min AJ. Comparison between modified lateral arm free flap and traditional lateral arm free flap for the Reconstruction of oral and maxillofacial soft tissue defects. Front Oncol. 2022;12:877799.35692763 10.3389/fonc.2022.877799
13. Qing L Wu P Zhou Z Yu F Tang J Customized reconstruction of complex three-dimensional defects in the extremities with individual design of vastus lateralis muscle-chimeric multi-lobed anterolateral thigh perforator flap J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2019 53 5 271 8 10.1080/2000656X.2019.1606004 31032709
Qing L, Wu P, Zhou Z, Yu F, Tang J. Customized reconstruction of complex three-dimensional defects in the extremities with individual design of vastus lateralis muscle-chimeric multi-lobed anterolateral thigh perforator flap. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2019;53(5):271–8.31032709 10.1080/2000656X.2019.1606004
14. Qing L Li X Wu P Zhou Z Yu F Tang J Customized reconstruction of complex soft-tissue defect in the hand and forearm with individual design of chain-linked bilateral anterolateral thigh perforator flaps J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2019 72 12 1909 16 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.08.004 31564579
Qing L, Li X, Wu P, Zhou Z, Yu F, Tang J. Customized reconstruction of complex soft-tissue defect in the hand and forearm with individual design of chain-linked bilateral anterolateral thigh perforator flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019;72(12):1909–16.31564579 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.08.004
15. Sui X Qing L Yu F Wu P Tang J The versatile thoracodorsal artery perforator flap for extremity reconstruction: from simple to five types of advanced applications and clinical outcomes J Orthop Surg Res 2023 18 1 973 10.1186/s13018-023-04480-3 38110957
Sui X, Qing L, Yu F, Wu P, Tang J. The versatile thoracodorsal artery perforator flap for extremity reconstruction: from simple to five types of advanced applications and clinical outcomes. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023;18(1):973.38110957 10.1186/s13018-023-04480-3
16. He J Qing L Wu P Zhou Z Yu F Zhang X Customized reconstruction of complex soft tissue defects in the upper extremities with variants of double skin paddle anterolateral thigh perforator flap Injury 2021 52 7 1771 7 10.1016/j.injury.2021.04.067 33994191
He J, Qing L, Wu P, Zhou Z, Yu F, Zhang X, et al. Customized reconstruction of complex soft tissue defects in the upper extremities with variants of double skin paddle anterolateral thigh perforator flap. Injury. 2021;52(7):1771–7.33994191 10.1016/j.injury.2021.04.067
17. Yu F Tang J Pan D Reconstruction of the dorsum of the hand and fingers with a bifoliate lateral arm flap: a case report J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2020 45 7 765 6 10.1177/1753193420920812 32362192
Yu F, Tang J, Pan D. Reconstruction of the dorsum of the hand and fingers with a bifoliate lateral arm flap: a case report. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2020;45(7):765–6.32362192 10.1177/1753193420920812
18. Qing L Luo G Li X Wu P Tang J Individualized design of thoracodorsal artery perforator chimeric flap for customized reconstruction of complex three-dimensional defects in the extremities J Orthop Surg Res 2023 18 1 367 10.1186/s13018-023-03852-z 37198689
Qing L, Luo G, Li X, Wu P, Tang J. Individualized design of thoracodorsal artery perforator chimeric flap for customized reconstruction of complex three-dimensional defects in the extremities. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023;18(1):367.37198689 10.1186/s13018-023-03852-z
19. Song D Deng X Chen Y Xie S Zhou X Thinned chimeric radial collateral artery perforator flap in complex distal thumb reconstruction Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2015 135 11 1623 31 10.1007/s00402-015-2324-5 26377731
Song D, Deng X, Chen Y, Xie S, Zhou X. Thinned chimeric radial collateral artery perforator flap in complex distal thumb reconstruction. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015;135(11):1623–31.26377731 10.1007/s00402-015-2324-5
20. Rehim SA Kowalski E Chung KC Enhancing aesthetic outcomes of soft-tissue coverage of the hand Plast Reconstr Surg 2015 135 2 e413 28 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001069
Rehim SA, Kowalski E, Chung KC. Enhancing aesthetic outcomes of soft-tissue coverage of the hand. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135(2):e413–28.10.1097/PRS.0000000000001069
21. Song R Song Y Yu Y Song Y The upper arm free flap Clin Plast Surg 1982 9 1 27 35 10.1016/S0094-1298(20)30370-9 7094520
Song R, Song Y, Yu Y, Song Y. The upper arm free flap. Clin Plast Surg. 1982;9(1):27–35.7094520 10.1016/S0094-1298(20)30370-9
22. Hennerbichler A Etzer C Gruber S Brenner E Papp C Gaber O Lateral arm flap: analysis of its anatomy and modification using a vascularized fragment of the distal humerus Clin Anat 2003 16 3 204 14 10.1002/ca.10140 12673815
Hennerbichler A, Etzer C, Gruber S, Brenner E, Papp C, Gaber O. Lateral arm flap: analysis of its anatomy and modification using a vascularized fragment of the distal humerus. Clin Anat. 2003;16(3):204–14.12673815 10.1002/ca.10140
23. di Summa PG Sapino G Guillier D Dash J Hart A Raffoul W Reverse-Flow Versus Perforator Propeller lateral arm flap for Elbow Reconstruction Ann Plast Surg 2020 84 5 535 40 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002143 31904649
di Summa PG, Sapino G, Guillier D, Dash J, Hart A, Raffoul W. Reverse-Flow Versus Perforator Propeller lateral arm flap for Elbow Reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2020;84(5):535–40.31904649 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002143
24. Hwang K Lee WJ Jung CY Chung IH Cutaneous perforators of the upper arm and clinical applications J Reconstr Microsurg 2005 21 7 463 9 10.1055/s-2005-918901 16254813
Hwang K, Lee WJ, Jung CY, Chung IH. Cutaneous perforators of the upper arm and clinical applications. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2005;21(7):463–9.16254813 10.1055/s-2005-918901
25. Chang EI Ibrahim A Papazian N Jurgus A Nguyen AT Suami H Perforator Mapping and Optimizing Design of the lateral arm flap: anatomy revisited and clinical experience Plast Reconstr Surg 2016 138 2 e300 6 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002393
Chang EI, Ibrahim A, Papazian N, Jurgus A, Nguyen AT, Suami H, et al. Perforator Mapping and Optimizing Design of the lateral arm flap: anatomy revisited and clinical experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138(2):e300–6.10.1097/PRS.0000000000002393
26. Yousif NJ Warren R Matloub HS Sanger JR The lateral arm fascial free flap: its anatomy and use in reconstruction Plast Reconstr Surg 1990 86 6 1138 45 10.1097/00006534-199012000-00016 2243857
Yousif NJ, Warren R, Matloub HS, Sanger JR. The lateral arm fascial free flap: its anatomy and use in reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;86(6):1138–45. discussion 46 – 7.2243857 10.1097/00006534-199012000-00016
27. Ye SM Yu Y Jing JH Zhou Y Zhang JS Teng XF One-stage reconstruction of complex soft tissue defects in the hands using multidigit, chimeric, lateral arm, perforator flaps J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2019 72 6 902 8 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.12.034 30630749
Ye SM, Yu Y, Jing JH, Zhou Y, Zhang JS, Teng XF, et al. One-stage reconstruction of complex soft tissue defects in the hands using multidigit, chimeric, lateral arm, perforator flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019;72(6):902–8.30630749 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.12.034
28. Klinkenberg M Fischer S Kremer T Hernekamp F Lehnhardt M Daigeler A Comparison of anterolateral thigh, lateral arm, and parascapular free flaps with regard to donor-site morbidity and aesthetic and functional outcomes Plast Reconstr Surg 2013 131 2 293 302 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31827786bc 23357991
Klinkenberg M, Fischer S, Kremer T, Hernekamp F, Lehnhardt M, Daigeler A. Comparison of anterolateral thigh, lateral arm, and parascapular free flaps with regard to donor-site morbidity and aesthetic and functional outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(2):293–302.23357991 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31827786bc
29. Yu F Tang J Revisiting vascular and venous drainage of lateral arm flap from anatomy Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2020 30 7 1321 2 10.1007/s00590-020-02687-2 32377920
Yu F, Tang J. Revisiting vascular and venous drainage of lateral arm flap from anatomy. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020;30(7):1321–2.32377920 10.1007/s00590-020-02687-2
