
==== Front
Spartan Med Res J
Spartan Med Res J
1364
Spartan Medical Research Journal
2474-7629
MSU College of Osteopathic Medicine Statewide Campus System Website: Spartan Medical Research Journal

122820
10.51894/001c.122820
Research Symposium
LOW RISK CHEST PAIN FOLLOW UP: A CASE SERIES
Stiles Nick DO 1
1 Emergency Medicine Ascension Genesys
30 8 2024
2024
9 2 ABSTRACTS FROM THE SECOND ANNUAL RESEARCH DAY HOSTED BY THE MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE, NOVI, MICHIGAN, APRIL 11, 2024. 12282015 7 2024
30 7 2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
==== Body
pmc11

INTRODUCTION

Chest pain is a common presenting complaint for patients seeking care in the Emergency Department. The HEART score is a validated pathway commonly used by Emergency Department Physicians to help determine which patients may be safe for discharge and outpatient follow up. We report a small case series of patients who were discharged from the Emergency Department with low-risk chest pain based on the HEART score and subsequently underwent telephone follow up to see if they were able to obtain timely follow up in the outpatient setting.

METHODS

Patients were screened by a physician in triage or occasionally one already roomed in the ED and consented for participation. For those patients who consented, a chart review was performed to determine discharge diagnosis and HEART score at discharge. Those found to be appropriate candidates for the study following their ED workup and disposition were called back at 6 weeks following their visit and asked a brief series of questions regarding follow up and barriers to follow up.

RESULTS

Phone call follow up was achieved in three patients. All three patients were able to follow up in the outpatient setting within six weeks following their Emergency Department visit. Only one patient had additional testing ordered. No barriers to follow up were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

No strong conclusions regarding the frequency or ease of follow-up can be drawn from this small, observational case series. A larger study including more patients would be helpful in determining whether these results can be generalized to similar patient populations.
