
==== Front
Cureus
Cureus
2168-8184
Cureus
2168-8184
Cureus Palo Alto (CA)

10.7759/cureus.65983
Dentistry
Orthodontic Retreatment of an Adult Bimaxillary Protrusion Patient With Lingual Appliances and Premolar Extractions: A Case Report
Muacevic Alexander
Adler John R
Nguyen Viet Anh 1
1 Faculty of Dentistry, Phenikaa University, Hanoi, VNM
Viet Anh Nguyen anh.nguyenviet1@phenikaa-uni.edu.vn
2 8 2024
8 2024
16 8 e659831 8 2024
Copyright © 2024, Nguyen et al.
2024
Nguyen et al.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
This article is available from https://www.cureus.com/articles/248741-orthodontic-retreatment-of-an-adult-bimaxillary-protrusion-patient-with-lingual-appliances-and-premolar-extractions-a-case-report
Orthodontic relapse and the demand for improved esthetics often necessitate retreatment in adult patients. This case report highlights the successful management of an adult female patient with bimaxillary protrusion, previously treated with a non-extraction approach. Treatment included lingual passive self-ligating appliances, premolar extractions, and mini-screws to reinforce anchorage. The patient's facial profile and dental esthetics were significantly improved after 20 months of treatment, achieving a stable occlusion and reduced bimaxillary protrusion. This case demonstrates that lingual appliances can be an effective and esthetic treatment option for complex orthodontic retreatment in adult patients. Careful biomechanical planning and attention to specific challenges, including torque control and bowing effect, are essential for successful outcomes.

esthetic appliances
passive self-ligating
premolar extraction
lingual appliances
case report
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

The demand for orthodontic retreatment has increased recently in adult patients despite comprehensive orthodontic treatment received during their childhood or adolescence [1]. The objectives of retreatment may be to address relapses of dental crowding or spacing due to poor retention compliance. Additionally, retreatment may be required to improve dental and facial esthetics, which are inadequately addressed in prior orthodontic treatment, possibly due to an improper treatment plan [2].

Adult patients seeking orthodontic retreatment may have higher expectations regarding treatment time, results, and appliance esthetics due to their prior orthodontic experience [3,4]. This heightened awareness can make them more discerning when choosing a treatment plan and appliance options. Esthetic appliances such as lingual brackets and clear aligners might be preferred to traditional labial appliances.

This case report presents the orthodontic retreatment of an adult patient with mouth protrusion that was not alleviated in the previous non-extraction treatment. The retreatment included premolar extractions, lingual appliances, and mini-screws.

Case presentation

Diagnosis and etiology

A 32-year-old female patient presented with a chief complaint of mouth protrusion. She had undergone orthodontic treatment with fixed labial appliances five years ago using a non-extraction strategy. However, she remained dissatisfied with the outcome as the bimaxillary protrusion remained significant. Her dental history revealed a history of dens evaginatus on the mandibular left second premolar, which had been worn out during chewing.

On the extraoral examination, the patient had a convex profile with protruded lips and mentalis strain on lip closure. The vertical proportion of the face was balanced, with a left-deviated chin (Figure 1). Her smile arc was flat, with normal buccal corridors, suggesting that arch expansion was not necessary [5]. Mini-esthetic analyses, including tooth size and shape, gingival contour, contact, and embrasure, revealed no abnormality. No signs of temporomandibular disorders were detected.

Figure 1 Pre-treatment extraoral and intraoral photographs.

(A) Frontal, (B) frontal smiling, (C) lateral, (D) lateral smiling, (E) right occlusion, (F) anterior occlusion, (G) left occlusion, (H) upper arch, (I) lower arch.

On the intraoral examination, the patient had class I canine and molar relationships on both sides with normal overjet and overbite. There was approximately a 0.4 mm space between the upper central incisors and a 0.5 mm space between the upper left canine and first premolar. The lower second molars were lingually inclined with low positions of lingual cusps. The lower left second premolar showed a worn extra cusp and did not respond to the pulp test.

On the lateral cephalometric evaluation, the patient had a class II skeletal relationship (point A-nasion-point B: 7.0°) with a protruded maxilla (A to N perpendicular: 7.1 mm), a retruded mandible (sella-nasion-point B: 75.2°), and a normodivergent facial pattern (Frankfort mandibular angle: 26.9°). The upper incisors had a normal inclination (upper incisor/sella-nasion: 103.1°) while the lower incisors were proclined (incisor mandibular plane angle: 112.5°, interincisal angle: 104.7°) (Table 1).

Table 1 Lateral cephalometric measurements.

SNA, sella-nasion-point A; SNB, sella-nasion-point B; ANB, point A-nasion-point B; FMA, Frankfort mandibular angle; SN-MP, sella-nasion to mandibular plane; SN, sella-nasion; NA, nasion-point A; MP, mandibular plane; NB, nasion-point B.

Measurements	Pre-treatment	Post-treatment	Norm	
Skeletal	
SNA (°)	82.2	82.0	81.1 ± 3.7	
SNB (°)	75.2	75.4	79.2 ± 3.8	
ANB (°)	7.0	6.6	2.5 ± 1.8	
FMA (°)	26.9	26.1	25.0 ± 4.0	
A to N perpendicular (mm)	7.1	5.7	0.4 ± 2.3	
Dental	
Upper incisor/SN (°)	103.1	95.4	105.3 ± 6.6	
Upper incisor/NA (°)	18.9	14.4	22.0 ± 5.0	
Upper incisor/NA (mm)	5.9	1.1	4.0 ± 3.0	
Lower incisor/MP (°)	112.5	99.3	90.0 ± 3.5	
Lower incisor/NB (°)	49.4	34.3	25.0 ± 5.0	
Lower incisor/NB (mm)	19.4	8.7	4.0 ± 2.0	
Interincisal angle (°)	104.7	129.7	128.0 ± 5.3	
Upper incisal display (mm)	3.3	1.5	2.5 ± 1.5	
Overjet (mm)	2.1	2.0	2.0 ± 2.0	
Overbite (mm)	0.7	1.0	2.0 ± 2.0	
Soft tissue	
E-line/Upper lip (mm)	2.4	0.4	0.0 ± 2.0	
E-line/Lower lip (mm)	7.7	2.0	0.0 ± 2.0	

The panoramic radiograph showed the presence of all teeth including the third molars, a periapical radiolucency on the lower left second premolar, and the lingual fixed retainers on both arches (Figure 2). Additionally, condylar degeneration resorption was apparent despite the absence of clinical signs and symptoms.

Figure 2 Pre-treatment radiographs.

(A) Lateral cephalometric radiograph, (B) panoramic radiograph.

Treatment plan

The treatment objectives were (1) to retract the upper and lower incisors to reduce lip protrusion, (2) to close all spaces in both arches, (3) to correct the lingually inclined lower second molars, and (4) to maintain the class I dental relationship, normal overbite, and overjet.

Considering the amount of dentoalveolar and lip protrusion, the normal inclination of the upper incisors, the proclined lower incisors, and the skeletal class II relationship, the optimal treatment plan was an orthodontic-orthognathic combination. The orthodontic decompensation would include premolar extractions in both arches followed by maxillary anterior segmental osteotomy and mandibular bilateral sagittal split osteotomy to address the protruded maxilla. The second treatment alternative was a non-surgical strategy with extractions of the upper first premolars, lower left first premolar, and hopeless lower left second premolar to retract the anterior teeth in both arches, compensating for the dentoalveolar protrusion. The second treatment alternative was selected as the patient denied surgical intervention. Lingual esthetic appliances were chosen as requested by the patient.

Treatment progress

Treatment was initiated by bonding all teeth with 0.018” x 0.025” lingual passive self-ligating brackets (Linpass SL, ADB, Korea) except for the four premolars to be extracted. Double vacuum-formed thermoplastic indirect bonding trays were used [6]. Mushroom lingual archwires were used in the initial leveling and alignment stage with the sequence of 0.014”, 0.016”, and 0.016” x 0.022” nickel-titanium wires.

After four months of treatment, the upper first premolars, lower right first premolar, and hopeless lower right second premolar were extracted. Stiff 0.016” x 0.022” stainless steel archwires with incorporated reverse curves of Spee were engaged to start the space closure stage. The upper archwire was pre-torqued with 15 degrees for torque control of the upper incisors. Power chains were used to retract the upper and lower incisors. Mini-screws and crimpable hooks were used in the upper arch to reinforce the posterior anchorage due to the class II tendency (Figure 3).

Figure 3 Space closure.

(A) Right occlusion, (B) anterior occlusion, (C) left occlusion, (D) upper arch, (E) lower arch.

After six months of initial space closure, the offset bends interfered with the first molar brackets, hindering continued space closure. Therefore, the old archwires were replaced with new ones with offset bends placed right posteriorly to the second premolar brackets. Despite the incorporated curves of Spee in the archwires, a mild lateral open bite developed due to the vertical bowing effect. Hence, vertical elastics were applied to the lingual bracket to close the lateral open bite.

A 20-degree pre-torqued 0.017” x 0.025” stainless steel archwire was engaged in the upper arch to fully express the torque of the upper incisors in the last three months of the 13-month space closure stage. The finishing stages took another three months and the total active treatment time was 20 months. After lingual appliance removal, fixed retainers were boned in both arches along with clear vacuum-formed retainers for nighttime wear.

Treatment results

Post-treatment extraoral and intraoral photographs show satisfied results with balanced smile and facial esthetics and functional occlusion (Figure 4). The lip protrusion was significantly reduced without mentalis strain on lip closure. The smile arc became more consonant. The class I canine and molar relationships were well-maintained with a normal overjet, overbite, and solid cuspal interdigitation. All extraction spaces were completely closed.

Figure 4 Post-treatment extraoral and intraoral photographs.

(A) Frontal, (B) frontal smiling, (C) lateral, (D) lateral smiling, (E) right occlusion, (F) anterior occlusion, (G) left occlusion, (H) upper arch, (I) lower arch.

The lateral cephalometric analysis showed a slight improvement in the skeletal class II relationship (point A-nasion-point B: 6.6°) and maxillary protrusion (A to N perpendicular: 5.7°). The lower incisor proclination was significantly reduced (incisor mandibular plane angle: 99.3°). Despite lingual tipping occurring on the upper incisors, the torque control of these teeth was acceptable as their roots approximated the lingual cortical bone (Figure 5). The panoramic radiograph showed acceptable root parallelism without signs of root resorption.

Figure 5 Post-treatment radiographs.

(A) Lateral cephalometric radiograph, (B) panoramic radiograph.

On the six-month follow-up, a gingivectomy was performed on the upper arch as requested by the patient to correct her short teeth. A digitally planned guide for precise gingival removal was designed an manufactured [7]. The one-year post-retention extraoral and intraoral photographs show the treatment outcomes to be stable without relapse tendency (Figure 6).

Figure 6 One-year post-retention extraoral and intraoral photographs.

(A) Frontal, (B) frontal smiling, (C) lateral, (D) lateral smiling, (E) right occlusion, (F) anterior occlusion, (G) left occlusion, (H) upper arch, (I) lower arch.

Discussion

In this case report, the patient sought a second orthodontic treatment due to dissatisfaction with prior non-extraction treatment. Despite achieving class I occlusion and well-aligned dental arches, the patient's dentoalveolar protrusion persisted, worsening their lateral profile and lip incompetence, and negatively impacting facial and smile esthetics.

In our practice, lingual appliances are generally the appliances of choice of adult patients seeking orthodontic retreatment due to their invisibility. This is especially true in cases requiring premolar extractions as a higher success rate could be expected with fixed appliances compared to clear aligners [8,9]. Within Eastern Asian patients seeking retreatment, dentoalveolar protrusion is a common cause as it has a high occurrence risk in patients treated with a non-extraction strategy. Eastern Asian female patients are generally not satisfied with convex profiles and proclined teeth [10]. Mild to moderate crowding cases could be managed with a non-extraction strategy with molar distalization and interproximal reduction [11,12]. However, decision-making may become challenging in borderline cases, possibly leading to an inappropriate non-extraction plan.

On the other hand, lingual appliances may pose some difficulties in premolar extraction cases compared to labial appliances. The most prominent challenge is the tendency for lingual tipping of the incisors during retraction [13]. The reason for this phenomenon is that the intrusion force of the archwire applied to the incisor lingual brackets passes lingually to the center of resistance of the incisors, in contrast to the labial brackets [14,15]. The intrusion force is generated by the archwire, as the incisors tend to extrude due to the vertical bowing effect (Figure 7). In this case report, the torque control of the lower incisors was straightforward due to their pre-treatment proclination. However, the torque control of the upper incisors posed more challenges because of their normal pre-treatment inclination. Nevertheless, the use of pre-torqued archwires with incorporated curves of Spee in combination with power hooks and vertical elastics led to a satisfactory result, with the upper incisor roots well placed in the cancellous bone approximately the lingual cortical plate.

Figure 7 Biomechanics of space closure with lingual appliances.

The bowing effect (BE) tends to create a lateral open bite. Flat shapes of archwires apply intrusion forces (Fi) to incisors passing lingually to incisors’ centers of resistance (CRes), resulting in lingual tipping moments (Mt). Reverse curves of Spee (RC) incorporated within archwires and vertical elastics (VE) can neutralize the bowing effect and avoid lingual tipping of incisors.

Another challenge of lingual appliances in managing premolar extraction cases is the interference of offset bends of the mushroom archwires with the first molar brackets during space closure, necessitating archwire replacement. To minimize this, the offset bends should be placed as close to the second premolar brackets as possible. Recently, lingual straight archwires have been introduced to eliminate offset bends and potentially offer higher stiffness to reduce the bowing effect [16-18]. However, these straight archwires may require increased tooth-bracket distance, potentially leading to thicker adhesive and a higher risk of bracket failure, along with potential patient discomfort due to the increased profile. Therefore, the classical mushroom archwire technique was used in this patient.

Conclusions

An adult patient with bimaxillary protrusion, previously treated with a non-extraction approach, was successfully retreated using lingual appliances, premolar extractions, and mini-screws. Significant improvements in both facial and dental esthetics were achieved. This case report demonstrates the potential of lingual appliances for effective and esthetic retreatment of compromised treated orthodontic cases in adult patients. Careful control of anchorage, incisor torque, and bowing effect is essential for achieving successful outcomes in extraction cases. Pre-torqued archwires with incorporated reverse curves of Spee, power hooks, and vertical elastics may be necessary in cases of challenging torque control.

Disclosures

Author Contributions

Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study.

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.

Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Concept and design:  Viet Anh Nguyen

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Viet Anh Nguyen

Drafting of the manuscript:  Viet Anh Nguyen

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Viet Anh Nguyen

Supervision:  Viet Anh Nguyen
==== Refs
References

1 Orthodontic retreatment need and related self-perceived factors among contemporary college freshmen in China J Clin Pediatr Dent Wang T Li H Xia W He F Guo Y 74 84 47 2023
2 Adult orthodontic retreatment: a survey of patient profiles and original treatment failings Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Chow L Goonewardene MS Cook R Firth MJ 371 382 158 2020 32709577
3 Management of an adult patient with missing one mandibular incisor, severe overjet, and midline discrepancy with asymmetric extraction, lingual appliance, and skeletal anchorage: a case report J World Fed Orthod Nguyen VA Nguyen TT Nguyen TT 86 94 9 2020 32672660
4 Characteristics of patients seeking orthodontic retreatment J World Fed Orthod Santiago RC da Silva Campos MJ Vitral RW Vieira RA Nojima LI Sant'Anna EF 36 40 11 2022 34774466
5 Buccal corridor and gummy smile treatment with MARPE and gingivoplasty: A 2-year follow-up case report APOS Trends Orthod Hoang V Tran PH Dang TT 1 5 4 2023
6 Lingual bracket transfer accuracy of double vacuum-formed indirect bonding tray using 3D-printed model: an in vivo study Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Anh NV Duc NM Tra NT Ngoc VT Son TM 294 302 165 2024 37906244
7 Digitally planned surgical crown lengthening: a novel bone reduction strategy to correct a gummy smile J Surg Case Rep Cong NT Nam PH Viet H Marya A 0 2024 2024
8 Treatment effectiveness of young adults using clear aligners versus buccal fixed appliances in class I malocclusion with first premolar extraction using the ABO-Objective Grading System: A randomized controlled clinical trial Int Orthod Jaber ST Hajeer MY Burhan AS Alam MK Al-Ibrahim HM 100817 21 2023 37837842
9 Class II correction and crowding treatment using in-house direct printed clear aligners: a literature review and case report Cureus Viet H Lam TH Phuc NN Lenh NN Thao DT 65024 16 2024
10 Lingual orthodontic treatment of a skeletal class II patient with miniscrew-assisted absolute anchorage in maxillary arch and total distalization in mandibular arch: a case report Orthod Waves Anh NV Tra NT Hanh NTT 97 106 80 2021
11 Digital workflows for 3D-printed customised double-slotted lingual appliances: a case report Aust Orthod J Anh NV Anh NT 29 39 2023
12 Management of moderate crowding by two-arch distalization using passive self-ligating lingual brackets, in-house digital indirect bonding, and mini-screw anchorage: a case report APOS Trends Orthod Anh NV Son TM Ngoc VT ANH NT 184 192 13 2023
13 Profile changes in extraction treatments of upper premolars: a case series Int Orthod Albertini P Albertini E Zucchini L Barbara L Lombardo L 100809 21 2023 37651761
14 Skeletal class III malocclusion with lateral open bite and facial asymmetry treated with asymmetric lower molar extraction and lingual appliance: a case report Int J Environ Res Public Health Ngoc VT Phuong NT Anh NV 18 2021
15 The treatment of severe class II division 2 patients with deep overbites and gummy smiles using lingual appliances: a case series Aust Orthod J Anh NV Ninh DV 81 96 40 2024
16 In-office indirect lingual bracket positioning and lingual straight archwire forming: a clinical technique Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Clin Companion Anh NV Son TM Ngoc VT Anh NT 212 227 3 2023
17 A new concept of anatomic lingual arch form Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Lombardo L Saba L Scuzzo G Takemoto K Oteo L Palma JC Siciliani G 260 1 138 2010
18 Stiffness comparison of mushroom and straight SS and TMA lingual archwires Prog Orthod Lombardo L Carlucci A Palone M Mollica F Siciliani G 27 17 2016 27593408
