
==== Front
Sci Rep
Sci Rep
Scientific Reports
2045-2322
Nature Publishing Group UK London

71181
10.1038/s41598-024-71181-0
Article
A novel lipophilic amiloride derivative efficiently kills chemoresistant breast cancer cells
Hu Michelle 1
Liu Ruiwu 1
Castro Noemi 1
Loza Sanchez Liliana 1
Rueankham Lapamas 1
Learn Julie A. 1
Huang Ruiqi 1
Lam Kit S. 1
Carraway Kermit L. III klcarraway@ucdavis.edu

12
1 https://ror.org/02kcc1z29 0000 0004 0394 5528 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, UC Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA USA
2 grid.27860.3b 0000 0004 1936 9684 UC Davis School of Medicine, 4645 2nd Avenue, Room 1100B, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
31 8 2024
31 8 2024
2024
14 2026330 6 2024
26 8 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Derivatives of the potassium-sparing diuretic amiloride are preferentially cytotoxic toward tumor cells relative to normal cells, and have the capacity to target tumor cell populations resistant to currently employed therapeutic agents. However, a major barrier to clinical translation of the amilorides is their modest cytotoxic potency, with estimated IC50 values in the high micromolar range. Here we report the synthesis of ten novel amiloride derivatives and the characterization of their cytotoxic potency toward MCF7 (ER/PR-positive), SKBR3 (HER2-positive) and MDA-MB-231 (triple negative) cell line models of breast cancer. Comparisons of derivative structure with cytotoxic potency toward these cell lines underscore the importance of an intact guanidine group, and uncover a strong link between drug-induced cytotoxicity and drug lipophilicity. We demonstrate that our most potent derivative called LLC1 is preferentially cytotoxic toward mouse mammary tumor over normal epithelial organoids, acts in the single digit micromolar range on breast cancer cell line models representing all major subtypes, acts on cell lines that exhibit both transient and sustained resistance to chemotherapeutic agents, but exhibits limited anti-tumor effects in a mouse model of metastatic breast cancer. Nonetheless, our observations offer a roadmap for the future optimization of amiloride-based compounds with preferential cytotoxicity toward breast tumor cells.

Subject terms

Lead optimization
Lysosomes
Breast cancer
National Institutes of HealthCA230742-S1 CA093373 CA250211-S1 CA250211-S2 Castro Noemi Loza Sanchez Liliana issue-copyright-statement© Springer Nature Limited 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

While amiloride has been used clinically for decades as an anti-kaliuretic in the management of hypertension1, and in the lab as a pharmacological tool for examining sodium transport2,3, substantial in vitro and in vivo data point to its anti-cancer and anti-metastatic potential4. High concentrations of amiloride have been demonstrated to inhibit mutagen-induced carcinogenesis5–7, tumor formation8–10 and metastatic progression11,12 in rats and mice. These outcomes are generally ascribed to the cytostatic effects of amiloride inhibition of sodium hydrogen exchanger-1 (NHE1), and to the motility-suppressing effects of urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) inhibition5.

Beyond cytostatic and anti-invasiveness activities, more recent observations indicate that amiloride and its derivatives also exhibit tumor cell-selective cytotoxicity via a non-apoptotic mechanism13–16. For example, our studies with the derivative 5-(N,N-hexamethylene)amiloride (HMA) underscore the notion that the properties of amiloride derivatives may be ideally suited for targeting particularly aggressive or therapy-refractory tumors17,18. HMA efficiently kills bulk breast tumor cells independent of tumor subtype, proliferation state or species of origin, but does not efficiently kill non-transformed cells derived from a variety of tissues at the same concentrations. Indeed, cell lines derived from diverse tumor types are equally susceptible to HMA, suggesting that its mechanism of cytotoxic action may be dependent on cellular transformation rather than patient-specific genetic alterations17,18. Moreover, HMA is cytotoxic toward breast cancer cell populations that are resistant to currently-employed therapies, including the highly refractory cancer stem cell population. Finally, HMA induces morphological changes within the lysosomes of tumor cells, and cytotoxicity is rescued by an inhibitor of the lysosomal protease cathepsin17,18, pointing a central role for the lysosome in its mechanism of action.

While our previous in vitro studies have revealed many attractive properties of amiloride derivatives, and suggest that derivatization of the C(5) position of its pyrazine ring can markedly enhance the tumor-selective cytotoxic properties of the drug, further translation of HMA is hampered by its relatively modest potency17,18 and poor pharmacokinetic properties in mice19. In this study we aimed to glean further insight into structure–activity relationships (SARs) within the amiloride pharmacophore by comparing the cytotoxic potential of derivatives modified at the C(2) and C(5) positions. At the same time, we sought to identify more potent derivatives that optimize tumor cell-specific cytotoxicity and preserve the ability to target chemoresistant populations. Here we report the synthesis and characterization of 10 novel amiloride derivatives, and identify a novel lead compound that acts with significantly greater potency than HMA that preserves tumor-selective cytotoxicity and efficiently eradicates chemoresistant breast tumor cells.

Results

Lipophilic additions to the amiloride pharmacophore increase cytotoxic potency

Amiloride is often modified at the C(2), C(5), and C(6) positions of its pyrazine ring (see Fig. 1A) to improve its transporter inhibition activity and selectivity8,20, and such derivatives have been employed to assess the contribution of ion channel function to tumor growth and progression4,14–19,21–29. However, our recent studies indicating that the amiloride derivative HMA can provoke the non-apoptotic death of tumor cells relative to non-cancer cells in vitro by acting via the lysosome17,18 prompt the question of whether these cytotoxic properties might be further optimized.Fig. 1 Modification of amiloride with lipophilic substituents enhances its cytotoxic potency. (A) Structure of amiloride with its pyrazine carbons numbered. (B–D) Structures of 2- and 5-substituted amiloride derivatives benzamil, HMA and 10357 are depicted. (E) Cytotoxic potency of amilorides toward cultured breast cancer cell lines after 24-h treatment. Data are presented as IC50 (μM) averages ± SEM.

As HMA adds a lipophilic hexamethylene group to the core pharmacophore at the C(5) position, we first asked whether lipophilic modification increases the cytotoxic potency of amiloride using previously published amiloride derivatives. Figure 1 depicts the structures of parent drug amiloride (Fig. 1A), C(2) derivative benzamil (Fig. 1B), C(5) derivative HMA (Fig. 1C), and C(5) derivative 10,357 (Fig. 1D)26, and summarizes the cytotoxic potency of these derivatives toward cell lines representing ER/PR-positive (MCF7), HER2-positive (SKBR3) and triple-negative (MDA-MB-231) breast tumor subtypes in an MTT cell viability assay (Fig. 1E). Consistent with previous observations14,15,17,28,30,31, we observed that while IC50 values for amiloride cytotoxicity are in the hundreds of micromolar, the three previously published lipophilic derivatives are 3- to 66-fold more potent, and followed the general efficacy pattern 10,357 > HMA > benzamil > amiloride toward each of the cell line models. These observations are consistent with the notion that membrane permeability and access to an intracellular target(s) may be key to the cytotoxic mechanism of action.

Novel amiloride derivatives underscore the importance of logP and the guanidine group

To more rigorously test the link between amiloride derivative lipophilicity and cytotoxic potential, we synthesized nine novel amiloride derivatives, most modified with various substituents at the C(5) position. The structures and IC50 values for cytotoxicity toward the three breast cancer cell line models are summarized in Table 1, and the chemical characteristics of all derivatives ordered by estimated IC50 are summarized in Table 2. Three key points emerge from comparisons of these derivatives. First, Table 2 points to a strong correlation between cytotoxic efficacy and lipophilicity, reflected in partition coefficient (logP) values of the derivatives as estimated by the Chemicalize Calculator. For example, LLC1 and 10,357, which exhibit some of the highest logP values (2.46 and 2.88, respectively) among the group, also exhibit the most potent cytotoxicity toward the breast cancer cell lines (5–13 µM and 9–17 µM, respectively). On the other hand, the low logP values for amiloride and LLC10 (− 0.89 and − 0.28, respectively) correlate with particularly poor cytotoxicity (148–995 µM and 883–2732 µM, respectively). Spearman rank correlation coefficients of IC50 with logP were 0.0083, 0.0035, and < 0.0001, respectively for MDA-MB-231, MCF7 and SKBR3 cells. Second, a direct comparison of derivatives LLC1 and LLC3 (Table 1) illustrates the importance of maintaining the integrity of the C(2) guanidine structure. Both derivatives contain an identical lipophilic C(5) substituent, but the removal of one of the guanidine amines results in a 3- to 23-fold decrease in cytotoxic potency. Finally, to a first approximation each of the derivatives acts with similar potency toward all three cell lines (Table 1). This suggests that, consistent with previous observations17,18, amiloride derivatives act with similar efficacy toward the different breast cancer subtypes. Overall, these observations reveal new parameters for the optimization of amiloride derivatives, and highlight LLC1 as a novel lead. Table 1 Potencies of novel 2- & 5-substituted amiloride derivatives.

Compound	MDA-MB-231 (mM)	MCF7 (mM)	SKBR3 (mM)	Structure	
LLC1	7 ± 4	13 ± 2	5 ± 0.6		
LLC2	43 ± 5	54 ± 5	97 ± 10		
LLC3	114 ± 25	75 ± 28	46 ± 6		
LLC4	40 ± 5	56 ± 17	34 ± 4		
LLC5	18 ± 1	29 ± 4	10 ± 0.6		
LLC7	111 ± 41	138 ± 58	129 ± 23		
LLC8	90 ± 11	75 ± 9	74 ± 7		
LLC9	52 ± 7	55 ± 11	53 ± 7		
LLC10	3000 ± 1000	1000 ± 3000	900 ± 400		
Calculated IC50 data from MDA-MB-231, MCF7, and SKBR3 cells (24-h treatment), and specific structures for each compound are represented in the table. Data are compiled from at least three biological replicates of each cell line and are presented as averages ± SEM.

Table 2 Chemical and cytotoxicity characteristics of amiloride derivatives.

Compound	Rule of 5	PSA (Å2)	Pol (Å3)	MR (cm3/mol)	Acidic pKa	Basic pKa	pI	logP	HLB	Sol (mg/ml)	IC50 (μM)	
LLC1	Y	136.5	37.3	103.4	14.8	7.1	11.0	2.5	11.5	0.015	5–13	
10,357	Y	142.5	39.6	102.7	14.8	5.5	10.2	2.9	11.7	0.001	9–17	
LLC5	Y	136.5	33.9	94.3	14.8	7.1	11.0	1.8	12.4	0.037	10–29	
HMA	Y	136.5	29.9	83.2	14.8	7.1	11.0	1.3	13.1	0.188	18–36	
LLC4	N	158.2	41.7	112.8	14.8	7.1	11.0	1.2	20.0	0.060	34–56	
LLC9	Y	174.8	41.1	111.5	14.5	7.1	10.8	1.2	17.7	0.121	52–55	
LLC2	Y	136.5	31.0	86.2	14.8	7.1	11.0	0.9	12.7	0.152	43–97	
Benzamil	Y	145.3	31.0	86.1	14.7	7.4	11.0	1.1	13.1	0.073	50–114	
LLC3	Y	110.2	34.8	97.6	12.5	2.7	7.6	2.8	16.9	0.018	46–114	
LLC8	Y	136.5	27.9	79.5	14.8	7.1	11.0	0.7	13.7	0.263	74–90	
LLC7	Y	171.3	31.5	86.2	14.5	9.9	12.1	0.03	18.9	0.215	111–138	
Amiloride	Y	159.3	19.7	56.7	14.8	7.3	11.1	− 0.9	15.9	2.77	148–995	
LLC10	Y	162.5	31.5	86.6	14.8	10.2	12.5	− 0.3	19.2	1.10	883–2732	
The chemical properties of the novel amiloride derivatives are ordered according to collective cytotoxicity IC50 toward MCF7, SKBR3 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell lines (far right column). Chemical data [Rule of 5, topological polar surface area (PSA), polarizability (Pol), molar refractivity (MR), acidic pKa, basic pKa, isoelectric point (pI), logP, hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB), and intrinsic solubility (Sol)], were obtained using Chemicalize (https://chemicalize.com, developed by ChemAxon).

LLC1 preferentially reduces the viability of murine mammary tumor organoids ex vivo

We have previously demonstrated that HMA reduces the viability of organoids derived from the PymT and NDL genetically-engineered mouse models of breast cancer18. To determine whether LLC1 is selectively cytotoxic toward mammary tumors relative to normal tissue, we compared its impact on tumor and normal mammary gland organoids generated from Balb/cJ mice orthotopically engrafted with 4T1 (ER-/PR-/HER2-), an isogenic murine mammary cancer cell line. The approximate IC50 value of LLC1 toward human tumor cell lines (10 µM, Table 1) was used to compare the efficiency of cell death as a function of time. We observed that while LLC1 reduces the viability of tumor organoids over 72 h of treatment (Fig. 2A and B), normal mammary gland organoids tend to be resistant to LLC1 treatment (Fig. 2C and D). These observations suggest that, similar to its predecessor HMA17,18, LLC1 exhibits significant selectivity toward cancer cells and leaves untransformed cells largely unharmed.Fig. 2 LLC1 selectively reduces the viability of mouse mammary tumors ex vivo. Representative images of LLC1-treated (10 µM) organoids generated from mammary tumors (A) and normal mammary glands (C) from 4T1-engrafted Balb/cJ mice are shown. Scale bar = 100 µm. (B,D) Organoids were treated with 10 µM LLC1, and viability was assessed using RealTime Glo over 72 h and normalized to vehicle treatment (DMSO). Tumor (B) or mammary fat pad (MFP) (D) organoid viability was monitored every 24 h. Data were compiled from three biological replicates that included six to twelve organoids derived from tumors or mammary glands of independent mice. Data are presented as averages ± SEM and significance assessed by t-test. *P < 0.05.

LLC1 acts on chemoresistant breast cancer cell populations

Our previous observations indicate that HMA is cytotoxic toward ‘persister’ populations of breast cancer cells that survive 3–9 day exposure to conventional chemotherapeutic agents cisplatin, docetaxel and doxorubicin (DOXO)18. To confirm HMA’s capabilities and test LLC1’s properties, we examined the impact of both drugs on the viability of various breast cancer cell line models of short-term and established therapeutic resistance. We first examined the response of chemoresistant populations of MDA-MB-231 cells toward the derivatives. In the experiment shown in Fig. 3, cells were first pretreated for 48 h with DMSO vehicle, and then further treated for 24 h with DMSO, 250 nM docetaxel (DTX), 5 μM DOXO, and either 40 μM HMA (Fig. 3A) or 10 μM LLC1 (Fig. 3D). In each case, drug treatment lowered cell viability by 15–40%, confirming that the drugs behave as expected. However, in cells pretreated for 48 h with either DTX (Fig. 3B and E) or DOXO (Fig. 3C and F), a second challenge with the pretreating drug did not reduce viability while HMA or LLC1 treatment lowered viability by 25–60%, consistent with the interpretation that chemotherapy-resistant populations are sensitive to amiloride derivatives.Fig. 3 HMA and LLC1 are cytotoxic toward chemoresistant triple-negative breast cancer cell populations. (A,D) MDA-MB-231 cells were initially treated with vehicle (DMSO) for 48 h, followed by a second challenge with DMSO, 250 nM docetaxel (DTX), 5 µM doxorubicin (DOXO), or either 40 µM HMA (A) or 10 µM LLC1 (D) for 24 h, and then cell viability was determined by MTT assay. (B,C,E,F) Following 48 h 250 nM DTX (B,E) or 5 µM DOXO (C,F) pretreatment, residual cells were treated with vehicle, initial chemotherapy treatment (DTX or DOXO), HMA (B,C), or LLC1 (E,F) for an additional 24 h. Data represent a minimum of four biological replicates and are presented as averages ± SEM, and significance was assessed by t-test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

We further observed that roughly half of T47D cells, an ER/PR+ breast cancer cell line, exhibit resistance to cell death induced by 72-h treatment with doxorubicin (DOXO, Fig. 4A) and docetaxel (Fig. 4D), reflected in the inability of high doses of either drug to further impact viability in a titration. However, we found that both HMA and LLC1 are cytotoxic toward the residual population that remains after chemotherapeutic treatment (Fig. 4B,C,E,F), and exhibit similar IC50 values as cell lines representing a variety of solid tumor types (Table 1).Fig. 4 HMA and LLC1 are cytotoxic toward chemoresistant ER/PR-positive breast cancer cell populations. Dose–response curves of T47D cells treated with doxorubicin (DOXO) (A) or docetaxel (DTX) (D) for 72 h are depicted. Populations of cells that persist at drug concentrations higher than 650 nM DOXO and 800 nM DTX (arrows) are considered drug resistant. Residual T47D cells that survive treatment with these levels of drugs for 72 h were then titrated with HMA (B,E) or LLC1 (C,F) for an additional 24 h and viability assessed. Data are compiled from at least three biological replicates.

Additionally, we observed that a breast cancer cell line selected for stable therapeutic resistance is as sensitive to amiloride derivatives as the drug-sensitive parental line. MX-10032 is a derivative of MCF7 cells selected for stable mitoxantrone resistance that overexpresses ABCG2 (aka breast cancer resistance pump, BCRP) by 30-fold. MCF7 TR-1 and MCF7 TR-533 are stable tamoxifen resistant derivatives, while MCF TS is (z)-4-hydroxytamoxifen (TAM) sensitive. Each cell line was treated with varying concentrations of TAM, DTX, DOXO, HMA, and LLC1, and cytotoxicity IC50 values were determined (Table 3). We observed that parental MCF7 cells are 3–13 fold more sensitive to chemotherapeutic agents DTX and DOXO than MX-100, but both cell lines are similarly sensitive to HMA and LLC1. Likewise, MCF7 TS cells are far more sensitive to tamoxifen than MCF7 TR-1 and MCF7 TR-5 cells, but all three lines are similarly sensitive to HMA and LLC1. Collectively, these observations provide strong evidence that amiloride derivatives act on breast tumor cell populations that are resistant to clinically pertinent anti-cancer agents. Table 3 MCF7 chemoresistant cells are susceptible to amiloride derivatives but not conventional chemotherapeutics.

Cell line	TAM (mM)	DTX (mM)	DOXO (mM)	HMA (mM)	LLC1 (mM)	
MCF7	–	1 ± 0.6	2 ± 0.3	27 ± 2	13 ± 2	
MCF7 MX-100	–	13 ± 3	7 ± 0.5	39 ± 3	12 ± 1	
MCF7 TS	13 ± 1	–	–	68 ± 3	25 ± 1	
MCF7 TR-1	ND	–	–	67 ± 4	26 ± 2	
MCF7 TR-5	ND	–	–	59 ± 5	19 ± 2	
The table depicts parent and chemoresistant MCF7 cell line derivatives titrated with chemotherapeutic agents tamoxifen (TAM), docetaxel (DTX), doxorubicin (DOXO), HMA, or LLC1 for 24 h to determine their IC50 values. ND denotes that an IC50 value could not be determined due to the very high dosage required. Data represent a minimum of three independent biological replicates and are presented as averages ± SEM.

Finally, we observed that both HMA and LLC1 are as cytotoxic toward diverse mammalian cell line models of cancer as human breast cancer cell line models. In the experiments summarized in Supplementary Table S3, we assessed the cytotoxic potencies of HMA and LLC1 toward Met-1 (triple-negative), NDL (HER2-positive), and 4T1 (triple-negative) murine breast cancer cells, as well as UCDK9MM3 (melanoma), UCDK9OSA29 (osteosarcoma), and D17 (osteosarcoma) canine tumor cell lines. We observed that HMA provokes the death of all models with IC50 values in the 20–40 μM range, while LLC1 induces cytotoxicity in the 7–14 μM range. These values are consistent with their potencies toward human breast cancer cell lines (Table 1), collectively providing support for the notion that amiloride derivatives act to eradicate transformed cells in a tumor type-, subtype-, and species-agnostic manner.

LLC1 provokes little observable tissue toxicity or anti-tumor effects in vivo

As a more potent cytotoxic agent than HMA, we sought to assess the in vivo anti-tumor efficacy of LLC1 using the orthotopic, immune-intact 4T1-Balb/c model of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. We began by performing a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) study with Balb/cJ mice, where animals were intraperitoneally injected with 0 mg/kg, 15 mg/kg, 30 mg/kg, and 45 mg/kg LLC1 three times over the course of one week. In this experiment we observed no obvious fluctuations in body weight (Fig. 5A) or aberrant behaviors in any of the animals. Likewise, bloodwork revealed no significant changes at any LLC1 treatment level in markers of liver and kidney damage compared to control (0 mg/kg LLC1) or the reference values (Fig. 5B). Moreover, organs including spleen, heart, liver, and kidneys exhibited no gross morphological (Fig. 5C–F) or histopathological differences (Supplementary Fig. S15) with LLC1, suggesting that under these treatment conditions LLC1 is well tolerated by mice.Fig. 5 LLC1 is well tolerated by mice. Adult Balb/cJ mice were injected intraperitoneally with 0–45 mg/kg LLC1 on days 0, 3 and 6 of the study and sacrificed on day 7. (A) Body weights were recorded throughout the study. (B) A blood chemistry panel illustrates the effects of repeated LLC1 treatment on liver (ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate transaminase; albumin; alk phos, alkaline phosphatase; total bilirubin; total protein) and kidney (BUN, blood urea nitrogen; creatinine; total protein) markers. Reference values taken from 95% intervals for female BALB/c mice at Charles River’s standard production setting (BALBcMouseClinicalPathologyData.pdf). Images of mouse (C) spleen, (D) heart, (E) liver, and (F) kidneys are displayed for each dose after formalin fixation.

To assess the impact of LLC1 on tumor growth properties we orthotopically implanted 4T1 cells into the mammary fat pads of Balb/cJ mice. A treatment paradigm of intraperitoneally-delivered vehicle or 30 mg/kg LLC1 three times per week for three weeks was initiated after tumors reached 100mm3 in volume (Fig. 6A), and animals were sacrificed a day after the last dose. Tumor volume (Fig. 6B) and mouse body weight (Supplementary Fig. S16A) were monitored over the course of treatment, and tumor volume (Fig. 6C), number of metastatic lesions observed per lung lobe (Fig. 6D and Supplementary Fig. S16B), and the area of metastatic coverage (Fig. 6E), were recorded at the experimental endpoint. We observed no statistically significant differences in tumor growth and metastatic characteristics upon treatment of animals with LLC1. Inspection of primary tumors revealed that although there was a relatively high degree of inherent necrosis associated with tumor tissue, LLC1 treatment did not significantly elevate necrosis (Fig. 6F and Supplementary Fig. S16C), strongly suggesting that drug dosing or delivery was insufficient to impact tumor characteristics.Fig. 6 LLC1 exhibits limited therapeutic efficacy toward a 4T1-Balb/cJ model of metastatic breast cancer. (A) Schematic of the treatment regimen is illustrated, where animals are treated three times per week for 3 weeks with vehicle (n = 8) or 30 mg/kg LLC1 (n = 11) after tumors reach 100mm3 in volume, and sacrificed 19 days after the initial injection. (B) Tumor volumes were determined for animals treated with vehicle and LLC1. Averages ± SEM at each time point are depicted. (C) Tumor volumes at sacrifice are compared. Metastatic burden was established through analysis of metastatic lesions per lobe (D) and metastatic area of the lung (E). (F) Area of necrosis was evaluated between vehicle- and LLC1-treated cohorts. Differences in metastatic burden parameters and necrotic area were compared by t-test and P values indicated.

To determine whether a significantly more aggressive strategy might improve treatment outcomes, we treated mice intraperitoneally twice daily for two weeks with vehicle, 10 mg/kg LLC1, or 30 mg/kg LLC1. We observed that while increased frequency of treatment suppressed the rates of tumor growth (Supplementary Fig. S17A) to close to statistical significance (Supplementary Fig. S17B), animals exhibited 10–15% weight loss (Supplementary Figs. S17C,D) suggestive of significant stress. Again, histological analysis revealed no statistically significant increase in primary tumor necrotic area or decrease in observed metastatic lesions with aggressive LLC1 treatment (not shown).

Discussion

Amiloride derivatives offer significant promise as anticancer therapeutic agents because they exhibit tumor cell-selective cytotoxicity and harbor the potential to eradicate chemoresistant tumor cell populations18. However, modest potency and poor pharmacokinetic properties have hampered efforts to translate these agents. The optimization of amiloride structure is an enticing area for medicinal chemists and biologists alike because the relative ease of synthesis and chemical modification allow the straightforward development of new derivatives while optimizing its unique anticancer properties. Our study reveals that LLC1, a novel lipophilic C(5) amiloride derivative, induces cell death in the single digit micromolar range, selectively kills tumor organoids relative to normal mammary gland organoids, and eradicates chemoresistant breast cancer cell populations. Collectively, our observations demonstrate that systematic analysis of amiloride pharmacophore modification can lead to improved anticancer drug candidates, agents that have the capacity to act across many tumor types, subtypes and even species.

Importantly, our SAR analysis provides two key insights into building more effective cancer-selective cytotoxic amiloride derivatives. First, we observed a strong relationship between amiloride lipophilicity, reflected in more positive logP values, and drug cytotoxicity. Indeed, our most potent derivative LLC1 exhibits one of the highest logP values of the compounds we have examined, suggesting that further increases in lipophilicity could result in even more effective drug leads. These conclusions dovetail with current trends in drug development that prioritize more lipophilic drugs because of their higher likelihood of passing safety and ADME concerns during Phase 1 clinical studies34. Second, disruption of the guanidine moiety at the C(2) position appears deleterious to cytotoxic function. LLC1 and LLC3 are identical except for the deletion of one of the guanidine amino groups in LLC3, and this change leads to an order of magnitude loss of potency. In this regard it might be interesting to determine whether lipophilic derivatives of other existing guanidine-containing drugs, or lipophilic compounds containing multiple guanidine groups, might similarly exhibit tumor cell-selective cytotoxicity and improved efficacy.

Our findings strongly suggest that amilorides act as cationic amphiphilic drugs (CADs), a broad class of agents defined by the presence of both a lipophilic moiety and a hydrophilic ionizable amine16,35,36. Over five dozen FDA-approved agents fit the general structural definition of CADs, including antidepressants, antibiotics, antiarrhythmics, and diuretics16,36. CADs characteristically accumulate in lysosomes and frequently provoke lysosome-mediated lipidosis which can be followed by cell death, and for this reason investigators will often disregard hits with these agents in drug screens35. However, the tumor-selective cytotoxicity of this drug class, together with observations that lipidotic responses may be readily reversed upon CAD withdrawal35,36, underscore the existence of a therapeutic window that might be exploited for cancer patient benefit.

Their high degree of hydrophobicity allows CADs to spontaneously cross membranes, while the low pH of the lysosome facilitates drug protonation, luminal trapping and accumulation, and disruption of lysosomal hydrolase activities. Enzymes of the lysosomal sphingolipid catabolic cascade appear particularly susceptible to CADs, possibly because electrostatic interactions of these enzymes and their chaperones with highly acidic intraluminal vesicles required for enzyme function are shielded by the positively charged agents35,36. The resulting accumulation of sphingolipid substrates then destabilizes the lysosomal limiting membrane, leading to lysosomal membrane permeabilization (LMP) and lysosome-dependent cell death (LDCD)37–40. A variety of cellular stressors, including cationic amphiphilic drugs, microtubule inhibitors, nanoparticles and lysosomotropic detergents, can damage and permeabilize the limiting lysosomal membrane. Beyond compromising lysosome function, LMP leads to the release of lysosomal hydrolases that act on cytosolic substrates to elicit a cascade of events culminating in cytolysis, the defining event in necrotic cell death40. Importantly, sequestration of CADs at the site of their targets in the lysosome and shielded from drug resistance-mediating plasma membrane drug pumps whose expression is common to many chemoresistant tumor cells may contribute to the sensitivity of chemoresistant cells to amiloride derivatives.

Two features of LMP/LDCD make the engagement of this cell death mode particularly attractive for anti-cancer therapeutics development. First, lysosomal membranes of transformed cells are inherently more fragile than those of normal cells38,41, explaining tumor cell selectivity of amiloride derivatives and offering a potential therapeutic window that might be exploited clinically. Second, we have observed both previously and in this study that chemoresistant cells, including cancer stem cells (CSCs), are as susceptible to this form of cell death as are differentiated (bulk) cancer cells40. CSCs are the rare subpopulation of tumor cells responsible for both tumor recurrence and metastasis, are notoriously resistant to chemotherapeutic and targeted therapeutic agents42,43, and remain a vexing barrier to achieving substantially improved patient outcomes. The similar susceptibility of CSCs and bulk cancer cells to LMP/LDCD suggests that CSC subpopulations cannot easily escape LMP/LDCD-inducing therapeutic agents to initiate primary or metastatic recurrence through reversion to the differentiated state. This then raises the possibility that these agents could be significantly more effective in altering patient outcomes than existing anti-cancer drug classes.

We chose the orthotopic 4T1-BALB/c mouse mammary tumor model to asses LLC1 potency in vivo because it recapitulates metastatic disease in an isogenic immune-intact model, and because our previous studies indicate that tumor tissue derived from this model is sensitive to amiloride derivative-induced cytotoxicity18. We observed that even under conditions of very aggressive dosing, 30 mg/kg twice daily for 2 weeks, the impact of LLC1 on tumor growth kinetics is modest. Moreover, while macro- and microscopic evidence of tissue damage was not apparent animals displayed 10–15% weight loss, possibly reflective of poor drug tolerance under these conditions. Together, these observations strongly suggest that LLC1 is not an appropriate candidate to move forward as a lead.

The limited anti-tumor effects of LLC1 in vivo are disappointing but not surprising. Previous studies demonstrate that HMA has a very short half-life in mice19, and in our previous studies we were only able to observe significant anti-tumor effects of HMA when we encapsulated the drug in a disulfide-linked nanoparticle that markedly prolongs half-life18. Future studies will be aimed at identifying higher potency amiloride derivatives with more favorable pharmacokinetic properties.

Materials and methods

Cell culture and drug treatments

Human breast cancer cell lines MDA-MB-231, MCF7, SKBR3, and T47D, and mouse mammary cancer cell line 4T1, were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA) and maintained at 37 °C and 10% CO2 in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Genesee Scientific) and antibiotics (penicillin/streptomycin; Gibco—Thermo Fisher). MCF7-B7-TS (MCF7 TS), MCF7-G11-TR-1 (MCF7 TR-1), MCF7-G11-TR-5 (MCF7 TR-5), and MCF7 MX-100 cells were obtained from the Physical Sciences-Oncology Network Bioresource Core Facility at ATCC or gifted from Dr. A.M. Yu, UC Davis. The tamoxifen (TAM) resistant lines were maintained in MCF7 base media supplemented with 1 μM or 5 μM TAM44. The mitoxantrone resistant line (MX-100) was maintained as previously described45. Met-1 (gifted by A.D. Borowsky, UC Davis) and NDL murine cells were maintained as previously described46,47. UCDK9MM3, UCDK9OSA27, and D17 canine cells (gifted by R.B. Rebhun, UC Davis) were maintained as previously described48–50. Cell line attributes are summarized in Supplementary Table S1.

Amiloride, HMA, benzamylamiloride (benzamil), and amiloride derivative 10,357 were sourced as described in Supplementary Table S2, applied to cells at 50–70% confluency in DMSO (final vehicle concentration < 0.5%), and analysis of amiloride derivative cytotoxicity in 96-well plates was carried out after 24 h except in the case of the organoid experiment (up to 72 h). In the experiments of Fig. 3 cells were first treated with vehicle control (Fig. 3A,D) or chemotherapeutic agents (250 nM docetaxel, Fig. 3B,E); 5 μM doxorubicin, Fig. 3C,F) for 48 h to select for short-term drug resistance, rinsed with PBS, and then further treated with a second challenge of the same drugs or with amiloride derivatives for 24 h in the same wells. In the experiments of Fig. 4 cells were either titrated with chemotherapeutic agents (0–10 μM doxorubicin, Fig. 4A; 0–10 μM docetaxel, Fig. 4D), or first pre-treated with 650 nM doxorubicin (Fig. 4B,C) or 800 nM docetaxel (Fig. 4E,F) for 72 h, rinsed with PBS, and then further titrated with amiloride derivatives for 24 h in the same wells.

Design and synthesis of novel amiloride derivatives

The new amiloride derivatives were designed to introduce novel hydrophobic groups at the C(5) position to improve cell permeability and potential in vivo availability. Synthesis of LLC1 was carried out as shown in Supplementary Fig. S1. To a suspension of methyl 3-amino-5,6-dichloro-2-pyrazinecarboxylate (compound 1; 444 mg, 2.0 mmol) in anhydrous dimethylformamide (DMF; 3 mL) was added 4-(4-fluorophenyl)piperidine (compound 2; 358.5 mg, 2.0 mmol) and N,N-Diisopropylethylamine (697 µL, 4.0 mmol), the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight and then added to cold water. The precipitate was collected by centrifuge and washed with water. The crude product (compound 3) was used for the next step without further purification. 0.5 M NaOCH3 solution in CH3OH (20 mL) was added to guanidine hydrochloride (955.3 mg, 10 mmol) and the resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 0.5 h. The white precipitate was removed by filtration, and the free guanidine solution in methanol was added to a suspension of methyl ester (compound 3; 364.8 mg, 1.0 mmol) in DMF (5 mL) and stirred at room temperature overnight. Brine (20 mL) was added, and the mixture extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 30 mL). The organic layer was washed with 10% NaCl (2 × 30 mL), dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude mixture was dissolved in 5 mL of 30% CH3CN/70% H2O and 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid and purified by a reverse phase HPLC. The collected eluent was lyophilized to yield the designed product LLC1. The structure was verified by Orbitrap high resolution ESI–MS: calculated 392.1402, found 392.1391 [M + 1] (Supplementary Fig. S2A). The purity was > 98% as shown in HPLC (Supplementary Fig. S2B). LLC3 was synthesized by mixing compound 3 in DMF with 1.0 M hydrazine (10 eq.) in ethanol overnight (Supplementary Fig. S1). The chemical identity and purity were verified by ESI–MS and HPLC (Supplementary Fig. S3A and Fig. 3B), respectively.

Other LLC compounds were synthesized using a similar approach with modification. Different amines were used to displace the C5-Cl in compound 1: 4-bromopiperidine hydrobromide (4) for LLC2 and LLC8, -piperonylpiperazine (6) for LLC4, 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline (7) for LLC5, 1,2-diaminocyclohexane (8), tert-butyl methyl(piperidin-4-ylmethyl)-carbamate (12) for LLC9 and LLC10. The synthetic approach of LLC2 and LLC8 is shown in Fig. S4. LLC4, LLC5 and LLC7 were prepared as shown in Fig. S5. The synthesis of LLC9 and LLC10 is shown in Fig. S6. Treatment of LLC9 with 50% trifluoroacetic acid in dichloromethane (DCM) for 1 h yielded LLC10. All LLC compounds have purity > 95% as shown in HPLC and their identities were verified by HR ESI–MS (Figs. S7–S13). Structure-based predictions of amiloride derivative chemical characteristics in Table 2, including logP, were obtained using the Chemicalize website (chemicalize.com).

MTT assay

Cells were seeded on 24-well plates and cultured to 50–70% confluency prior to treatment with various compounds for 24–72 h depending on the assay context. Following treatments, media was aspirated from cells and replaced with 5 mg/mL 3-(4,5-Dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT, #M5655, Sigma Aldrich) solution in base media. Cells were incubated at 37 °C for 1–2 h to induce formazan crystal formation, then washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to remove impurities. Crystals were dissolved using isopropyl alcohol (0.5% 1N HCl in isopropanol), and sample absorbance (λex 570 nm) was measured with a FilterMax F5 microplate reader (Molecular Devices) and Multi-Mode Analysis software (Version 3.4.0.27, Beckman Coulter). The reported IC50 values for each drug were calculated from the concentration required to induce half-maximal suppression of absorbance across 3–4 biological replicates.

Ex vivo drug cytotoxicity organoid assay

Tumors were harvested after 1 × 106 4T1 cells engrafted into Balb/cJ mice (#000651, The Jackson Laboratory) at the 4th mammary fat pad were grown to 1.0–1.5 cm in diameter. Tumors or pooled mammary glands from Balb/cJ mice were chopped into fine pieces using a razor blade before addition to digestion buffer (DMEM/F12 #SH30023, HyClone;1% PenStrep, Gibco—Thermo Fisher; 2% fetal bovine serum (FBS), Genesee Scientific; collagenase/hyaluronidase (5%: tumors & 10%: mammary glands), #07912, StemCell Technologies; 5 mg/mL insulin, Gibco—Thermo Fisher) and vortexed. Samples were digested for 2 h at 37 °C with gentle shaking, and samples vortexed every 30 min, before they were processed. After neutralization of the digestion buffer with DMEM (Gibco—Thermo Fisher) containing 10% FBS, organoids were centrifuged at 700 rpm to remove cellular debris. ACK lysis buffer (Gibco—Thermo Fisher) was used to remove red blood cells from the organoids. A quick spin was performed to remove additional debris and to pellet organoids. Once resuspended in PBS, organoids were embedded into MatriGel (#354230, Corning) and cultured in organoid growth media (OGM) on 24-well plates as described previously51. After overnight incubation in OGM, organoids were treated with vehicle or 10 µM LLC1 for up to 72 h, and viability was measured using RealTime Glo (#G9711, Promega) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Images were taken before drug treatment (0 h) and every 24 h over the course of drug treatment. Representative brightfield images were taken with an Olympus IX81 microscope with CellSens Entry software. Chemiluminescent images were taken with a ChemiDoc Touch Imaging System (BioRad) and analyzed with FIJI (https://imagej.net/Fiji) software to quantify RealTime Glo signal.

Statistical, data, and image analysis

A minimum of three biological replicates per experiment was performed with values calculated and expressed as averages ± standard error of the mean (SEM), unless otherwise stated. Statistical significance was between control and test arms was determined using paired t-test; P-values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Data analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel or GraphPad Prism version 9.3.1 for Windows (GraphPad Software; San Diego, CA, USA; www.graphpad.com). Images were compiled in Microsoft PowerPoint and only brightness and contrast were altered for clarity.

Maximum tolerated dose study

8–10 week old Balb/cJ mice (strain 000651) were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory and were acclimated to the animal room for at least 1 week prior to use. To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for LLC1, mice (n = 3/cohort) were randomly separated into four groups and injected intraperitoneally with 0 mg/kg (10% DMSO in saline), 15 mg/kg, 30 mg/kg, and 45 mg/kg LLC1 in 10% DMSO in saline three times over seven days. Body weights and clinical signs were observed daily. Mice were sacrificed the day following the third treatment after cardiac puncture to collect blood. After coagulation and separation by centrifugation, serum was collected for blood chemistry panel analysis. Organs were harvested and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for paraffin embedding and sectioning.

LLC1 therapeutic efficacy study

2 × 105 4T1 cells in PBS were mixed in a 1:1 volume/volume ratio with PuraMatrix Peptide Hydrogel (#354250, Corning) and injected bilaterally into the 4th mammary fat pads of 8–10 week old Balb/cJ mice under anesthesia by continuous inhalation of 2% isoflurane gas. The 4th nipple was used as a landmark for injection into the mammary gland with sterile tweezers lifting the nipple while the syringe needle loaded the cell suspension into the mammary fat pad. Tumor dimensions were measured twice per week with digital calipers and tumor volume calculated according to the formula v = (w2 x l) × 0.5236. Once tumors reached 100mm3, animals were randomized into two cohorts: 8 mice injected with 10% DMSO in saline and 11 mice injected with 30 g/kg LLC1 in 10% DMSO in saline. Mice were injected intraperitoneally with their appropriate dose three times per week for three weeks before sacrifice by CO2 asphyxiation the day after the last treatment. Tumors and organs were harvested and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for paraffin embedding and sectioning.

Histology

H&E-stained sections of tumors, liver, kidney and heart were prepared as previously described52. 5 µm sections were imaged using Keyence microscope BZ-X800, and LLC1 toxicity was assessed based on any morphologic changes. For the therapeutic study, all xenograft tumors were subjected to histological analysis. For tumors, the area of active necrosis was quantified and normalized to total tumor area from 2 to 6 randomly selected fields across three serial sections. Staining of lungs for metastatic lesions was modified from whole mount mammary gland and tumor protocols previously described52. Briefly, lungs were dehydrated, cleared, and stained with Mayer’s hematoxylin before imaging of macrometastases with a dissecting scope (Zeiss Stemi 2000-C; Axiocam ERc/5 s). Analyses of lesions were performed using two approaches: (1) lesions were counted per lung lobe and averaged between two different slides, and (2) lesion area was quantified and averaged between total lung area. Lungs were then rehydrated and processed to confirm histology.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-024-71181-0.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Frederic Gorin for providing compound 10357 and Dr. Aiming Yu for providing the MX-100 MCF7 derivative cell line. This research was funded by NIH/NCI grants R01CA250211, R01CA250211-S1, R01CA250211-S2, and R01CA230742-S1 (KLC). The UC Davis Combinatorial Chemistry and Chemical Biology Shared Resource is supported by NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30CA093373 and was responsible for the synthesis and purification of the compounds. A preprint version of this article may be found at bioRxiv: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.05.25.542364v2.

Author contributions

Participated in research design: Hu, Liu, Carraway. Conducted experiments: Hu, Liu, Castro, Huang, Loza-Sanchez, Rueankham, Learn. Contributed new reagents or analytic tools: Liu, Lam. Performed data analysis: Hu, Liu, Castro, Learn. Wrote or contributed to the writing of the manuscript: Hu, Carraway.

Data availability

Data related to the synthesis and characterization of novel amiloride derivatives may be found in the Supplementary Materials. Other primary data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval and accordance statement

All animal studies are reported in accordance with Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines. All animal procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the University of California, Davis, and were carried out according to IACUC guidelines and regulations.

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. Sun Q Sever P Amiloride: A review J. Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2020 21 1470320320975893 10.1177/1470320320975893 33234024
Sun, Q. & Sever, P. Amiloride: A review. J. Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 21, 1470320320975893. 10.1177/1470320320975893 (2020).33234024 10.1177/1470320320975893
2. Horisberger JD Amiloride-sensitive Na channels Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1998 10 443 449 10.1016/S0955-0674(98)80056-2 9719863
Horisberger, J. D. Amiloride-sensitive Na channels. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 10, 443–449 (1998).9719863 10.1016/S0955-0674(98)80056-2
3. Kleyman TR Cragoe EJ Jr Cation transport probes: The amiloride series Methods Enzymol. 1990 191 739 755 10.1016/0076-6879(90)91045-8 1963659
Kleyman, T. R. & Cragoe, E. J. Jr. Cation transport probes: The amiloride series. Methods Enzymol. 191, 739–755 (1990).1963659 10.1016/0076-6879(90)91045-8
4. Matthews HM Ranson M Kelso MJ Anti-tumour/metastasis effects of the potassium-sparing diuretic amiloride: An orally active anti-cancer drug waiting for its call-of-duty? Int. J. Cancer 2011 129 2051 2061 10.1002/ijc.26156 21544803
Matthews, H. M., Ranson, M. & Kelso, M. J. Anti-tumour/metastasis effects of the potassium-sparing diuretic amiloride: An orally active anti-cancer drug waiting for its call-of-duty?. Int. J. Cancer 129, 2051–2061 (2011).21544803 10.1002/ijc.26156
5. Tatsuta M Inhibition by amiloride of gastric carcinogenesis induced by N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine in Wistar rats Br. J. Cancer 1993 67 1011 1014 10.1038/bjc.1993.185 8494694
Tatsuta, M. et al. Inhibition by amiloride of gastric carcinogenesis induced by N-methyl-N’-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine in Wistar rats. Br. J. Cancer 67, 1011–1014 (1993).8494694 10.1038/bjc.1993.185
6. Tatsuta M Inhibition by amiloride of experimental carcinogenesis induced by azaserine in rat pancreas Cancer Lett. 1996 106 23 28 10.1016/0304-3835(96)04298-X 8827043
Tatsuta, M. et al. Inhibition by amiloride of experimental carcinogenesis induced by azaserine in rat pancreas. Cancer Lett. 106, 23–28 (1996).8827043 10.1016/0304-3835(96)04298-X
7. Tatsuta M Chemoprevention by amiloride against experimental hepatocarcinogenesis induced by N-nitrosomorpholine in Sprague-Dawley rats Cancer Lett. 1997 119 109 113 10.1016/S0304-3835(97)00262-0 18372529
Tatsuta, M. et al. Chemoprevention by amiloride against experimental hepatocarcinogenesis induced by N-nitrosomorpholine in Sprague-Dawley rats. Cancer Lett. 119, 109–113 (1997).18372529 10.1016/S0304-3835(97)00262-0
8. Kleyman TR Cragoe EJ Jr Amiloride and its analogs as tools in the study of ion transport J. Membr. Biol. 1988 105 1 21 10.1007/BF01871102 2852254
Kleyman, T. R. & Cragoe, E. J. Jr. Amiloride and its analogs as tools in the study of ion transport. J. Membr. Biol. 105, 1–21 (1988).2852254 10.1007/BF01871102
9. Sparks RL Pool TB Smith NK Cameron IL Effects of amiloride on tumor growth and intracellular element content of tumor cells in vivo Cancer Res. 1983 43 73 77 6847785
Sparks, R. L., Pool, T. B., Smith, N. K. & Cameron, I. L. Effects of amiloride on tumor growth and intracellular element content of tumor cells in vivo. Cancer Res. 43, 73–77 (1983).6847785
10. Jankun J Keck RW Skrzypczak-Jankun E Swiercz R Inhibitors of urokinase reduce size of prostate cancer xenografts in severe combined immunodeficient mice Cancer Res. 1997 57 559 563 9044824
Jankun, J., Keck, R. W., Skrzypczak-Jankun, E. & Swiercz, R. Inhibitors of urokinase reduce size of prostate cancer xenografts in severe combined immunodeficient mice. Cancer Res. 57, 559–563 (1997).9044824
11. Kellen JA Mirakian A Kolin A Antimetastatic effect of amiloride in an animal tumour model Anticancer Res. 1988 8 1373 1376 3218971
Kellen, J. A., Mirakian, A. & Kolin, A. Antimetastatic effect of amiloride in an animal tumour model. Anticancer Res. 8, 1373–1376 (1988).3218971
12. Evans DM Sloan Stakleff KD Control of pulmonary metastases of rat mammary cancer by inhibition of uPA and COX-2, singly and in combination Clin. Exp. Metastasis 2004 21 339 346 10.1023/B:CLIN.0000046140.19131.19 15554390
Evans, D. M. & Sloan Stakleff, K. D. Control of pulmonary metastases of rat mammary cancer by inhibition of uPA and COX-2, singly and in combination. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 21, 339–346 (2004).15554390 10.1023/B:CLIN.0000046140.19131.19
13. Hegde M Roscoe J Cala P Gorin F Amiloride kills malignant glioma cells independent of its inhibition of the sodium-hydrogen exchanger J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2004 310 67 74 10.1124/jpet.103.065029 15010500
Hegde, M., Roscoe, J., Cala, P. & Gorin, F. Amiloride kills malignant glioma cells independent of its inhibition of the sodium-hydrogen exchanger. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 310, 67–74 (2004).15010500 10.1124/jpet.103.065029
14. Leon LJ Pasupuleti N Gorin F Carraway KL 3rd A cell-permeant amiloride derivative induces caspase-independent, AIF-mediated programmed necrotic death of breast cancer cells PLoS One 2013 8 e63038 10.1371/journal.pone.0063038 23646172
Leon, L. J., Pasupuleti, N., Gorin, F. & Carraway, K. L. 3rd. A cell-permeant amiloride derivative induces caspase-independent, AIF-mediated programmed necrotic death of breast cancer cells. PLoS One 8, e63038. 10.1371/journal.pone.0063038 (2013).23646172 10.1371/journal.pone.0063038
15. Pasupuleti N Leon L Carraway KL 3rd Gorin F 5-Benzylglycinyl-amiloride kills proliferating and nonproliferating malignant glioma cells through caspase-independent necroptosis mediated by apoptosis-inducing factor J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2013 344 600 615 10.1124/jpet.112.200519 23241369
Pasupuleti, N., Leon, L., Carraway, K. L. 3rd. & Gorin, F. 5-Benzylglycinyl-amiloride kills proliferating and nonproliferating malignant glioma cells through caspase-independent necroptosis mediated by apoptosis-inducing factor. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 344, 600–615 (2013).23241369 10.1124/jpet.112.200519
16. Hu M Carraway KL 3rd Repurposing cationic amphiphilic drugs and derivatives to engage lysosomal cell death in cancer treatment Front. Oncol. 2020 10 605361 10.3389/fonc.2020.605361 33425762
Hu, M. & Carraway, K. L. 3rd. Repurposing cationic amphiphilic drugs and derivatives to engage lysosomal cell death in cancer treatment. Front. Oncol. 10, 605361. 10.3389/fonc.2020.605361 (2020).33425762 10.3389/fonc.2020.605361
17. Rowson-Hodel AR Hexamethylene amiloride engages a novel reactive oxygen species- and lysosome-dependent programmed necrotic mechanism to selectively target breast cancer cells Cancer Lett. 2016 375 62 72 10.1016/j.canlet.2016.02.042 26944316
Rowson-Hodel, A. R. et al. Hexamethylene amiloride engages a novel reactive oxygen species- and lysosome-dependent programmed necrotic mechanism to selectively target breast cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 375, 62–72 (2016).26944316 10.1016/j.canlet.2016.02.042
18. Berg AL The cationic amphiphilic drug hexamethylene amiloride eradicates bulk breast cancer cells and therapy-resistant subpopulations with similar efficiencies Cancers 2022 14 949 10.3390/cancers14040949 35205696
Berg, A. L. et al. The cationic amphiphilic drug hexamethylene amiloride eradicates bulk breast cancer cells and therapy-resistant subpopulations with similar efficiencies. Cancers 14, 949. 10.3390/cancers14040949 (2022).35205696 10.3390/cancers14040949
19. Luo J Tannock IF Inhibition of the regulation of intracellular pH: Potential of 5-(N, N-hexamethylene) amiloride in tumour-selective therapy Br. J. Cancer 1994 70 617 624 10.1038/bjc.1994.360 7917906
Luo, J. & Tannock, I. F. Inhibition of the regulation of intracellular pH: Potential of 5-(N, N-hexamethylene) amiloride in tumour-selective therapy. Br. J. Cancer 70, 617–624 (1994).7917906 10.1038/bjc.1994.360
20. Li JH Cragoe EJ Lindemann B Structure-activity relationship of amiloride analogs as blockers of epithelial Na channels: I. Pyrazine-ring modifications J. Membr. Biol. 1985 83 45 56 10.1007/BF01868737 2582124
Li, J. H., Cragoe, E. J. & Lindemann, B. Structure-activity relationship of amiloride analogs as blockers of epithelial Na channels: I. Pyrazine-ring modifications. J. Membr. Biol. 83, 45–56 (1985).2582124 10.1007/BF01868737
21. García-Cañero R Trilla C Pérez de Diego J Díaz-Gil JJ Cobo JM Na+:H+ exchange inhibition induces intracellular acidosis and differentially impairs cell growth and viability of human and rat hepatocarcinoma cells Toxicol. Lett. 1999 106 215 228 10.1016/S0378-4274(99)00072-7 10403666
García-Cañero, R., Trilla, C., Pérez de Diego, J., Díaz-Gil, J. J. & Cobo, J. M. Na+:H+ exchange inhibition induces intracellular acidosis and differentially impairs cell growth and viability of human and rat hepatocarcinoma cells. Toxicol. Lett. 106, 215–228 (1999).10403666 10.1016/S0378-4274(99)00072-7
22. Aredia F Multiple effects of the Na(+)/H (+) antiporter inhibitor HMA on cancer cells Apoptosis 2013 18 1586 1598 10.1007/s10495-013-0898-3 23996609
Aredia, F. et al. Multiple effects of the Na(+)/H (+) antiporter inhibitor HMA on cancer cells. Apoptosis 18, 1586–1598 (2013).23996609 10.1007/s10495-013-0898-3
23. Harguindey S Arranz JL Wahl ML Orive G Reshkin SJ Proton transport inhibitors as potentially selective anticancer drugs Anticancer Res. 2009 29 2127 2136 19528473
Harguindey, S., Arranz, J. L., Wahl, M. L., Orive, G. & Reshkin, S. J. Proton transport inhibitors as potentially selective anticancer drugs. Anticancer Res. 29, 2127–2136 (2009).19528473
24. Harguindey S Cariporide and other new and powerful NHE1 inhibitors as potentially selective anticancer drugs–an integral molecular/biochemical/metabolic/clinical approach after one hundred years of cancer research J. Transl. Med. 2013 11 282 10.1186/1479-5876-11-282 24195657
Harguindey, S. et al. Cariporide and other new and powerful NHE1 inhibitors as potentially selective anticancer drugs–an integral molecular/biochemical/metabolic/clinical approach after one hundred years of cancer research. J. Transl. Med. 11, 282. 10.1186/1479-5876-11-282 (2013).24195657 10.1186/1479-5876-11-282
25. Amith SR Wilkinson JM Fliegel L KR-33028, a potent inhibitor of the Na(+)/H(+) exchanger NHE1, suppresses metastatic potential of triple-negative breast cancer cells Biochem. Pharmacol. 2016 118 31 39 10.1016/j.bcp.2016.08.010 27521504
Amith, S. R., Wilkinson, J. M. & Fliegel, L. KR-33028, a potent inhibitor of the Na(+)/H(+) exchanger NHE1, suppresses metastatic potential of triple-negative breast cancer cells. Biochem. Pharmacol. 118, 31–39 (2016).27521504 10.1016/j.bcp.2016.08.010
26. Gorin FA Pasupuleti N Mahajan D Dugar S Killing glioma “stem-like” cells via drug-induced relocation of endosomal urokinase proteins Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 2017 17 40 47 10.2174/1871520616666160628122901 27357540
Gorin, F. A., Pasupuleti, N., Mahajan, D. & Dugar, S. Killing glioma “stem-like” cells via drug-induced relocation of endosomal urokinase proteins. Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 17, 40–47 (2017).27357540 10.2174/1871520616666160628122901
27. Pasupuleti N Intracellular urokinase uPA-PAl-1 complex: Disruption by small molecule targets hypoxically programmed glioma cells Open Access J. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2018 7 18 10.19080/OAJNN.2018.07.555712
Pasupuleti, N. et al. Intracellular urokinase uPA-PAl-1 complex: Disruption by small molecule targets hypoxically programmed glioma cells. Open Access J. Neurol. Neurosurg. 7, 18. 10.19080/OAJNN.2018.07.555712 (2018).10.19080/OAJNN.2018.07.555712
28. Buckley BJ 6-Substituted hexamethylene amiloride (HMA) derivatives as potent and selective inhibitors of the human urokinase plasminogen activator for use in cancer J. Med. Chem. 2018 61 8299 8320 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b00838 30130401
Buckley, B. J. et al. 6-Substituted hexamethylene amiloride (HMA) derivatives as potent and selective inhibitors of the human urokinase plasminogen activator for use in cancer. J. Med. Chem. 61, 8299–8320 (2018).30130401 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b00838
29. Buckley BJ Systematic evaluation of structure-property relationships and pharmacokinetics in 6-(hetero)aryl-substituted matched pair analogs of amiloride and 5-(N, N-hexamethylene)amiloride Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2021 37 116116 10.1016/j.bmc.2021.116116 33799173
Buckley, B. J. et al. Systematic evaluation of structure-property relationships and pharmacokinetics in 6-(hetero)aryl-substituted matched pair analogs of amiloride and 5-(N, N-hexamethylene)amiloride. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 37, 116116. 10.1016/j.bmc.2021.116116 (2021).33799173 10.1016/j.bmc.2021.116116
30. Lee YS Sayeed MM Wurster RD Intracellular Ca2+ mediates the cytotoxicity induced by bepridil and benzamil in human brain tumor cells Cancer Lett. 1995 88 87 91 10.1016/0304-3835(94)03619-T 7850778
Lee, Y. S., Sayeed, M. M. & Wurster, R. D. Intracellular Ca2+ mediates the cytotoxicity induced by bepridil and benzamil in human brain tumor cells. Cancer Lett. 88, 87–91 (1995).7850778 10.1016/0304-3835(94)03619-T
31. Shono Y Change in intracellular pH causes the toxic Ca2+ entry via NCX1 in neuron- and glia-derived cells Cell Mol. Neurobiol. 2010 30 453 460 10.1007/s10571-009-9470-7 19830548
Shono, Y. et al. Change in intracellular pH causes the toxic Ca2+ entry via NCX1 in neuron- and glia-derived cells. Cell Mol. Neurobiol. 30, 453–460 (2010).19830548 10.1007/s10571-009-9470-7
32. Ross DD Atypical multidrug resistance: breast cancer resistance protein messenger RNA expression in mitoxantrone-selected cell lines J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1999 91 429 433 10.1093/jnci/91.5.429 10070941
Ross, D. D. et al. Atypical multidrug resistance: breast cancer resistance protein messenger RNA expression in mitoxantrone-selected cell lines. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 91, 429–433 (1999).10070941 10.1093/jnci/91.5.429
33. Zhang HY Effects of long noncoding RNA-ROR on tamoxifen resistance of breast cancer cells by regulating microRNA-205 Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2017 79 327 337 10.1007/s00280-016-3208-2 28063065
Zhang, H. Y. et al. Effects of long noncoding RNA-ROR on tamoxifen resistance of breast cancer cells by regulating microRNA-205. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 79, 327–337 (2017).28063065 10.1007/s00280-016-3208-2
34. Lobo S Is there enough focus on lipophilicity in drug discovery? Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2020 15 261 263 10.1080/17460441.2020.1691995 31736369
Lobo, S. Is there enough focus on lipophilicity in drug discovery?. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 15, 261–263 (2020).31736369 10.1080/17460441.2020.1691995
35. Showalter MR The emerging and diverse roles of bis(monoacylglycero) phosphate lipids in cellular physiology and disease Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020 21 8067 10.3390/ijms21218067 33137979
Showalter, M. R. et al. The emerging and diverse roles of bis(monoacylglycero) phosphate lipids in cellular physiology and disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 8067. 10.3390/ijms21218067 (2020).33137979 10.3390/ijms21218067
36. Ellegaard AM Bach P Jäättelä M Targeting cancer lysosomes with good old cationic amphiphilic drugs Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2023 185 107 152 10.1007/112_2020_56 33398504
Ellegaard, A. M., Bach, P. & Jäättelä, M. Targeting cancer lysosomes with good old cationic amphiphilic drugs. Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 185, 107–152 (2023).33398504 10.1007/112_2020_56
37. Boya P Kroemer G Lysosomal membrane permeabilization in cell death Oncogene 2008 27 6434 6451 10.1038/onc.2008.310 18955971
Boya, P. & Kroemer, G. Lysosomal membrane permeabilization in cell death. Oncogene 27, 6434–6451 (2008).18955971 10.1038/onc.2008.310
38. Hämälistö S Jäättelä M Lysosomes in cancer-living on the edge (of the cell) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2016 39 69 76 10.1016/j.ceb.2016.02.009 26921697
Hämälistö, S. & Jäättelä, M. Lysosomes in cancer-living on the edge (of the cell). Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 39, 69–76 (2016).26921697 10.1016/j.ceb.2016.02.009
39. Serrano-Puebla A Boya P Lysosomal membrane permeabilization as a cell death mechanism in cancer cells Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2018 46 207 215 10.1042/BST20170130 29472365
Serrano-Puebla, A. & Boya, P. Lysosomal membrane permeabilization as a cell death mechanism in cancer cells. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 46, 207–215 (2018).29472365 10.1042/BST20170130
40. Berg AL Mayrovitz HN Engaging the lysosome and lysosome-dependent cell death in cancer Breast Cancer 2022 Exon Publications
Berg, A. L. et al. Engaging the lysosome and lysosome-dependent cell death in cancer. In Breast Cancer (ed. Mayrovitz, H. N.) (Exon Publications, 2022).
41. Petersen NHT Transformation-associated changes in sphingolipid metabolism sensitize cells to lysosomal cell death induced by inhibitors of acid sphingomyelinase Cancer Cell 2013 24 379 393 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.08.003 24029234
Petersen, N. H. T. et al. Transformation-associated changes in sphingolipid metabolism sensitize cells to lysosomal cell death induced by inhibitors of acid sphingomyelinase. Cancer Cell 24, 379–393 (2013).24029234 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.08.003
42. Shibata M Hoque MO Targeting cancer stem cells: A strategy for effective eradication of cancer Cancers (Basel) 2019 11 732 10.3390/cancers11050732 31137841
Shibata, M. & Hoque, M. O. Targeting cancer stem cells: A strategy for effective eradication of cancer. Cancers (Basel) 11, 732. 10.3390/cancers11050732 (2019).31137841 10.3390/cancers11050732
43. Zhou HM Zhang JG Zhang X Li Q Targeting cancer stem cells for reversing therapy resistance: Mechanism, signaling, and prospective agents Signal. Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021 6 62 10.1038/s41392-020-00430-1 33589595
Zhou, H. M., Zhang, J. G., Zhang, X. & Li, Q. Targeting cancer stem cells for reversing therapy resistance: Mechanism, signaling, and prospective agents. Signal. Transduct. Target. Ther. 6, 62. 10.1038/s41392-020-00430-1 (2021).33589595 10.1038/s41392-020-00430-1
44. Lyu Y Kopcho S Alvarez FA Okeoma BC Okeoma CM Development of a cationic amphiphilic helical peptidomimetic (B18L) as a novel anti-cancer drug lead Cancers 2020 12 2448 10.3390/cancers12092448 32872253
Lyu, Y., Kopcho, S., Alvarez, F. A., Okeoma, B. C. & Okeoma, C. M. Development of a cationic amphiphilic helical peptidomimetic (B18L) as a novel anti-cancer drug lead. Cancers 12, 2448. 10.3390/cancers12092448 (2020).32872253 10.3390/cancers12092448
45. Li X Bioengineered miR-27b-3p and miR-328-3p modulate drug metabolism and disposition via the regulation of target ADME gene expression Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2019 9 639 647 10.1016/j.apsb.2018.12.002 31193825
Li, X. et al. Bioengineered miR-27b-3p and miR-328-3p modulate drug metabolism and disposition via the regulation of target ADME gene expression. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 9, 639–647 (2019).31193825 10.1016/j.apsb.2018.12.002
46. Borowsky AD Syngeneic mouse mammary carcinoma cell lines: Two closely related cell lines with divergent metastatic behavior Clin. Exp. Metastasis 2005 22 47 59 10.1007/s10585-005-2908-5 16132578
Borowsky, A. D. et al. Syngeneic mouse mammary carcinoma cell lines: Two closely related cell lines with divergent metastatic behavior. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 22, 47–59 (2005).16132578 10.1007/s10585-005-2908-5
47. Miller JK Suppression of the negative regulator LRIG1 contributes to ErbB2 overexpression in breast cancer Cancer Res. 2008 68 8286 8294 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6316 18922900
Miller, J. K. et al. Suppression of the negative regulator LRIG1 contributes to ErbB2 overexpression in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 68, 8286–8294 (2008).18922900 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6316
48. Aina OH Canine malignant melanoma alpha-3 integrin binding peptides Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2011 143 11 19 10.1016/j.vetimm.2011.05.018 21722969
Aina, O. H. et al. Canine malignant melanoma alpha-3 integrin binding peptides. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 143, 11–19 (2011).21722969 10.1016/j.vetimm.2011.05.018
49. Thomas R Influence of genetic background on tumor karyotypes: Evidence for breed-associated cytogenetic aberrations in canine appendicular osteosarcoma Chromosome Res. 2009 17 365 377 10.1007/s10577-009-9028-z 19337847
Thomas, R. et al. Influence of genetic background on tumor karyotypes: Evidence for breed-associated cytogenetic aberrations in canine appendicular osteosarcoma. Chromosome Res. 17, 365–377 (2009).19337847 10.1007/s10577-009-9028-z
50. Nytko KJ Thumser-Henner P Weyland MS Scheidegger S Rohrer Bley C Cell line-specific efficacy of thermoradiotherapy in human and canine cancer cells in vitro PLoS One 2019 14 e0216744 10.1371/journal.pone.0216744 31091255
Nytko, K. J., Thumser-Henner, P., Weyland, M. S., Scheidegger, S. & Rohrer Bley, C. Cell line-specific efficacy of thermoradiotherapy in human and canine cancer cells in vitro. PLoS One 14, e0216744. 10.1371/journal.pone.0216744 (2019).31091255 10.1371/journal.pone.0216744
51. Nguyen-Ngoc KV ECM microenvironment regulates collective migration and local dissemination in normal and malignant mammary epithelium Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2012 109 2595 2604 10.1073/pnas.1212834109 22308497
Nguyen-Ngoc, K. V. et al. ECM microenvironment regulates collective migration and local dissemination in normal and malignant mammary epithelium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109, 2595–2604 (2012).22308497 10.1073/pnas.1212834109
52. Rowson-Hodel AR Neoplastic transformation of porcine mammary epithelial cells in vitro and tumor formation in vivo BMC Cancer 2015 15 562 10.1186/s12885-015-1572-7 26228788
Rowson-Hodel, A. R. et al. Neoplastic transformation of porcine mammary epithelial cells in vitro and tumor formation in vivo. BMC Cancer 15, 562. 10.1186/s12885-015-1572-7 (2015).26228788 10.1186/s12885-015-1572-7
