
==== Front
Curr Neuropharmacol
Curr Neuropharmacol
CN
Current Neuropharmacology
1570-159X
1875-6190
Bentham Science Publishers

36815632
CN-22-866
10.2174/1570159X21666230222092029
Medicine, Neurology, Pharmacology, Neuroscience
The Gut-Brain Axis and the Microbiome in Anxiety Disorders, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
MacKay Marnie 1
Yang Bohan H. 1
Dursun Serdar M. 12
Baker Glen B. 12*
1 Department of Psychiatry, Neurochemical Research Unit, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada;
2 Neuroscience and Mental Health Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
* Address correspondence to this author at the Department of Psychiatry, Neurochemical Research Unit, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; and Neuroscience and Mental Health Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; E-mail: glen.baker@ualberta.ca
22 2 2023
2024
22 5 866883
02 10 2022
07 11 2022
18 11 2022
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Bentham Science Publishers
2024
The Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Bentham Science Publishers. This is an open access article published under CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
A large body of research supports the role of stress in several psychiatric disorders in which anxiety is a prominent symptom. Other research has indicated that the gut microbiome-immune system-brain axis is involved in a large number of disorders and that this axis is affected by various stressors. The focus of the current review is on the following stress-related disorders: generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Descriptions of systems interacting in the gut-brain axis, microbiome-derived molecules and of pro- and prebiotics are given. Preclinical and clinical studies on the relationship of the gut microbiome to the psychiatric disorders mentioned above are reviewed. Many studies support the role of the gut microbiome in the production of symptoms in these disorders and suggest the potential for pro- and prebiotics for their treatment, but there are also contradictory findings and concerns about the limitations of some of the research that has been done. Matters to be considered in future research include longer-term studies with factors such as sex of the subjects, drug use, comorbidity, ethnicity/race, environmental effects, diet, and exercise taken into account; appropriate compositions of pro- and prebiotics; the translatability of studies on animal models to clinical situations; and the effects on the gut microbiome of drugs currently used to treat these disorders. Despite these challenges, this is a very active area of research that holds promise for more effective, precision treatment of these stress-related disorders in the future.

Keywords

Microbiome
microbiota
gut-brain axis
immune system
prebiotics
probiotics
==== Body
pmc1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Stress and Psychiatric Disorders

There is now a large body of evidence indicating that chronic stress has a significant role in the development of several psychiatric disorders, including anxiety disorders and major depressive disorder (MDD) [1-5]. In recent years, there have also been exciting research developments indicating the important role of the gut microbiome and the immune system and their interactions with the brain in the etiology of these psychiatric disorders [6-17] and the effects of various stressors on the composition of the gut microbiome [18-23]. Although there is now extensive research implicating the gut microbiome in a wide variety of diseases and disorders [14], the focus of this review paper is on the interaction of the gut microbiome-immune system-brain axis with anxiety disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Although all these disorders were listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, version IV (DSM-IV) under Anxiety Disorders, in DSM-5 PTSD and OCD are listed in separate categories. The terms microbiota and microbiome are used interchangeably in this review, although the term gut microbiota refers to the wide variety of microorganisms (bacteria, viruses, fungi and other single-celled organisms) living in the gut, while gut microbiome refers to these microorganisms and their genes. A literature review was done on PubMed and Web of Science for the past 20 years using the search phrases: gut microbiome/ microbiota in: generalized anxiety disorder; panic disorder; social anxiety disorder; post-traumatic stress disorder; obsessive-compulsive disorder. The relevant papers obtained were also searched for other papers related to the gut microbiome-immune system-brain axis.

1.2 The Gut Microbiome-immune System-brain Axis

The past couple of decades have seen exciting advances made in learning about the integration of bidirectional communication between the gut microbiome, the immune system and the brain and how that communication is related to psychiatric disorders (Fig. 1). It has been suggested for some time that the gut microbiome is involved in maintaining the integrity of the mucosal barrier, modulating the immune system and protecting against pathogens [24], and research now provides evidence indicating that alterations in the gut microbiota can modulate plasticity in the brain [1, 25]. It has been reported that the gut microbiome is involved in the regulation of blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability, brain volume, neurocircuitry, myelination and glial cell function [25, 26]. The gut microbiome can interface with the enteric nervous system and the autonomic nervous system, e.g. with the vagus nerve, to send signals to the central nervous system (CNS), and in a bidirectional fashion, the CNS can send signals to the gut to modulate the composition and function of the microbiome [9, 25]. There is constant communication among the mucosal, peripheral and central immune systems and the gut microbiome [8, 27], and the endocrine system also communicates bidirectionally with the gut microbiome, with the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis thought to play a major role [7]. In chronic stress situations, the gut epithelial layer may become more permeable, resulting in increased movement of endotoxins from inside the gut to the outside, leading to a low-grade inflammation characteristic of a number of mood and anxiety disorders [2, 10, 28]. Gut permeability is strongly associated with gut dysbiosis, and increased intestinal permeability to bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and antigens derived from food can contribute to alterations in functions of glia and the immune system, thus affecting glial regulation of activity and survival of neurons [28]. Comprehensive tables of studies on interactions among the gut microbiome, the immune and endocrine systems and anxiety-like and affective behaviors are included in several recent papers [1, 2, 6, 25].

1.3 Microbiome-derived Molecules

Gut microbiota produces a number of active molecules that can affect brain function, although in most cases, the precise mechanisms by which the effects occur are not yet clearly understood. Molecules formed by the gut microbiome and which may alter brain function include neurotransmitters [e.g. biogenic amines, acetylcholine and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)], short chain fatty acids (SCFAs), indoles (tryptophan and its metabolites), peptides, bile acids, choline and its metabolites, lactate and vitamins [3]. These molecules may affect behavior through various mechanisms, including: direct effects on receptors in the brain; stimulation of neural, endocrine and immune mediators in the periphery; and epigenetic regulation (histone acetylation and DNA methylation) [3, 10, 25]. How the neurotransmitters produced by the gut affect the brain directly [29] is not entirely clear because some do not pass the blood-brain barrier (BBB) readily, but they can modulate the immune system either directly or by affecting cytokine production by local stimulation of the vagus nerve [3, 30-34], possibly affecting brain neurotransmission in this way.

Tryptophan, an essential amino acid that comes from food intake, is the precursor for the neurotransmitter serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT), which has been proposed to be involved in the etiology and/or treatment of a large number of psychiatric disorders, including major depressive disorder and stress-related disorders that feature symptoms of anxiety [35]. Serotonin is also the precursor of N-acetylserotonin (NAS) and melatonin, which are antioxidants, have antiinflammatory effects and increase oxidative phosphorylation and function in mitochondria [36, 37]. However, much more of the tryptophan in the body is metabolised through the kynurenine pathway. Stress-related increased gut permeability/dysbiosis can cause an increase in levels of proinflammatory cytokines, resulting in activation of indole-2,3-deoxygenase (IDO) and tryptophan-2,3-deoxygenase (TDO), diverting metabolism to the kynurenine pathway, and less tryptophan may be converted to serotonin and subsequently NAS and melatonin. After initial catabolism by IDO, TDO and tryptophanase, tryptophan is converted to numerous metabolites, and several of these indoles can affect neuroinflammation and/or neuro-regeneration and repair [38-45]. Quinolinic acid and kynurenic acid have neurotoxic and neuroprotective properties, respectively [38-42]. Indole, a metabolite of tryptophan produced by gut microbes expressing trpytophanase, has been shown by Wei et al. [46] to produce neurogenesis in mouse hippocampuses and to elevate levels of the synaptic markers postsynaptic density protein 95 and synaptophysin. The same researchers reported that indole produces some of these effects through interaction with the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) and that the indole-AhR-mediated signaling pathway results in elevation of of expression of threee genes involved in neurogenesis, namely, β-catenin, Neurog2 and VEGF-α. Kynurenine, in addition to being a precursor for quinolinic and kynurenic acids, has direct effects, including activation of the AhR, thus affecting the function of several immune and glial cells [46].

Anaerobic fermentation of predominantly indigestible carbohydrates by gut microbiota results in the formation of SCFAs, e.g. acetate, butyrate and propionate (see Fig. (2) for structures). These SCFAs have multiple effects on energy regulation, lipohomeostasis, integrity of the intestinal barrier, the BBB, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) expression, functioning of the immune system and epigenetics [3, 25, 47-49]. Wang et al. [50] conducted studies in which sodium butyrate was administered orally to control mice and an Alzheimer’s disease (AD) model (the mice were injected with Aβ25-35) and found that butyrate improved the cognitive and memory functions of AD mice and also observed that butyrate improved mitochondrial function of astrocytes and enhanced the lactate shuttle between neurons and astrocytes. Stress, by causing increased gut permeability, can result in raised circulating LPS levels and suppressed butyrate levels, driving oxidative and nitrosative signalling, culminating in activation of acidic sphingomyeln-induced ceramide, which has negative effects on the regulation of mitochondrial functions directly and by negatively impacting orexin and pineal gland melatonin, chemicals which normally have a positive regulatory effect on mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation [51]. Through increasing sirtuin-3 located in the mitochondria, butyrate produces deacetylation and disinhibition of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDC), resulting in increased conversion of pyruvate to acetyl-CoA, enhancing the production of ATP from the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and oxidative phosphorylation [51]. Interestingly, acetyl-CoA is also a co-substrate in the initiation of the melatoninergic pathway in the mitochondria, which in turn is instrumental in the regulation of the immune glial cells [52, 53]. O’Riordan et al. [48] have provided comprehensive tables listing gut bacteria that produce SCFAs, the effects of SCFAs on brain physiology and the role of SCFAs on enteroendocrine and neuropeptide signalling in the gut-brain axis. Anderson and Maes [51] have published a comprehensive review on how gut dysbiosis may cause dysregulation of central and systemic homeostasis through altering mitochondrial function.

There is also emerging evidence that gut peptides such as neuropeptide Y, peptide YY, antimicrobial peptides, glucagon-like peptide (GLP-1), cholecsytokinin, corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF), oxytocin and ghrelin may play a role in the gut-brain axis [54, 55]. Several of these peptides modulate neuronal and immune functions and also have antimicrobial properties [55]. Gut peptides in systemic circulation can affect gut-brain communication by binding to receptors on immune cells and vagus nerve terminals [54].

An exciting development with regard to microbiome-derived molecules is the discovery that the gut-derived metabolite 4-ethylphenyl sulfate (4-EPS; see Fig. (2) for stucture) alters brain activity and functional connectivity in mice and induces anxiety-like activity; the researchers reported that that 4-EPS impairs oligodendrocyte maturation and decreases oligodendrocyte-neuron interactions [56]. A recent study on microbiota-induced alterations in proline metabolism may be relevant to anxiety disorders, although it focuses on depression. Mayneris-Perxachs et al. [57], using a multiomics approach, found that microbiome-dependent elevations in plasma levels of proline in humans were associated with the severity of depressive symptoms. In preclinical studies, these researchers found that proline supplementation resulted in increased depression-like symptoms in mice and that knockdown of proline and GABA transporters or mono-association with L. Plantarum resulted in protection against depression-like states in Drosophila. Although these experiments dealt with depression, the findings may have relevance to anxiety since depression and anxiety are often comorbid and several antidepressants are also anxiolytic; in addition, GABA is known to be important in the etiology and pharmacotherapy of anxiety, and proline accumulation has been shown to disrupt the production of GABA [57].

1.4 Probiotics and Prebiotics

Probiotics are consumable microbiota intended for administration to produce a healthier microbiome. Prebiotics include complex carbohydrates and plant polysaccharides that can be catabolized by gut microbiota and can affect several metabolic pathways in the body through the actions of their metabolic by-products, SCFAs [58]. Effects reported with probiotics and prebiotics include dampening of the stress response, decreased intestinal permeability, decreased inflammation, and improvement of the symptoms of depression [5]. Psychobiotics are probiotics or prebiotics that have significant effects on the brain and behavior, particularly on mental health aspects [3, 59-63]. It has been reported by several researchers that probiotics and prebiotics can have antianxiety- and/or antidepressant-like effects in rodent models [1, 33, 63-70] and can produce antianxiety and antidepressant effects, reduced stress hormones, improved cognition and reduced inflammation in humans [71-87]. However, although many of the reported studies in humans are promising, findings are variable and in some cases contradictory, and many papers indicate that larger, better designed clinical trials are necessary [75-77, 82, 84, 87, 88]. High interpersonal variability in microbiome composition also represents a problem for treatment with these preparations, but there are similarities in the relative abundance and distribution of bacterial species among healthy persons [89], giving hope for future treatment of mood and anxiety disorders with microbiota-targeted therapies [6, 90].

2 GENERALIZED ANXIETY DISORDER (GAD)

The link between anxiety and the gut microbiome was suggested by studies in mice showing an association between stress reactivity and microbiota [91] and reduced anxiety-like behaviour in germ-free mice lacking microbes [16, 92-94]. Subsequent research on BALB/c mice, which have increased anxiety-like behaviour compared to NIH Swiss mice, showed a reduction in such activity when colonized with microbiota from NIH Swiss mice compared to those colonized with microbiota from donor BALB/c mice; the reverse situation was observed, i.e. increased anxiety-like activity, when NIH Swiss mice were colonized with microbiota from BALB/c mice [95]. Interestingly, research in which adult behaviour was studied subsequent to colonization of germ-free mice at various postnatal ages suggested that adolescence might be a key period where microbes can influence the development of stress circuitry and anxiety-like behaviour [1, 16, 92-94, 96]. A study by Desbonnet et al. [97] with antibiotics in mice and by Reid et al. [98] in fecal analyses from adolescent humans provided additional evidence for the importance of the adolescent period in the development of this anxiety-like behaviour.

Jang et al. [99] reported that stress exposure in mice resulted in increased anxiety-like behaviour and increased abundance of Proteobacteria and Escherichia coli and reduced amounts of Lactobacillus. These same researchers demonstrated increased anxiety-like behaviour and inflammation when fecal microbiota was transferred from stressed to unstressed mice, i.e. that E. coli administered orally resulted in increased anxiety-like activity and that L. johnsonii administration reduced anxiety-like behaviour induced by stress or E. coli. De Palma et al. [100] reported an increased abundance of taxa from the genera Blautia to be associated with anxiety in people and mice. They also found that colonization of germ-free mice with fecal microbiota from patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and accompanying anxiety resulted in increased anxiety-like behaviour in those mice compared to germ-free mice receiving fecal microbiota from healthy human controls or patients with IBS without accompanying anxiety. Jin et al. [101] studied anxiety-like behaviour, genetics and gut microbiome composition in the Collaborative Cross (CC) mouse model. They found five microbiota families differing between high and low anxiety mice and proposed that the genetic contribution to anxiety was mediated partially by the gut microbiome [101].

Dandekar et al. [102] conducted a comprehensive study in which rats exposed to two models of stress (maternal separation and chronic unpredictable mild stress) were administered the multi-strain probiotic Cognisol for 6 weeks. The probiotic reversed the anxiety as well as a number of biochemical changes produced by the stress, including reversal of decreased brain levels of BDNF and serotonin and restoration of plasma levels of tryptophan and several of its metabolites, the Firmicutes-to-Bacteroide ratio and fecal levels of SCFAs [102].

Although there is a lack of translational research from animal models to the clinical situation with regard to the gut microbiome and anxiety, altered gut microbial composition, as well as reduced microbial diversity and richness, have been reported in patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) compared to healthy controls [103, 104]. Chen et al. [103] found a negative association between the severity of anxiety and abundance of Prevotella and a positive association with abundance of Bacteroides and Escherichi-Shigella. Jiang et al. [104] found lower Prevotellaceae, Faecalibacterium and Sutterella and higher Lactobacilllus in GAD patients relative to controls and also reported that GAD patients in remission showed an increase in abundance of SCFA-producing genera (Eubacterium rectale, Faecalibacterium, and Sutterella) compared to those patients with symptoms of active GAD. Taylor et al. [81] reported a positive correlation between Lactobacillus and anxiety symptoms. Mason et al. [105] found a lower abundance of Bactriodes in patients with comorbid anxiety and depression relative to patients with depression only and also reported a negative correlation between Clostridium XIVa and anxiety symptoms. In a recent review and meta-analysis, Nikolova et al. [106] concluded that there is a transdiagnostic commonality of microbial disturbances in a number of psychiatric disorders, including anxiety, in which there is a depletion of anti-inflammatory butyrate-producing bacteria and an enrichment of proinflammatory bacteria. Guo et al. [107] concluded that GAD comorbid with functional gastrointestinal disease (FGID) may be related to an increase in relative abundance of Fusobacterium and that GAD not comorbid with FGID may be related to an increase in relative abundance of Hemophilus. In a study of 48 patients with GAD and 57 healthy controls, Cheng et al. [108] concluded that the onset of GAD is related to BDNF gene polymorphism accompanied by changes in the intestinal flora and in components of the immune system.

Results from several clinical studies on the administration of probiotics and prebiotics to humans have shown improvement in anxiety symptoms and provided further support for a link between gut microbiota and anxiety [109-114], although variable results have been reported. Yang et al. [115] conducted a systematic review on the effects of regulating intestinal microbiota on anxiety symptoms. They analyzed 21 studies containing 1,503 subjects; of those studies, 2/3 had probiotics to regulate intestinal microbiota and the others had non-probiotic means such as adjusting daily diets. More than half of the studies found that regulating intestinal flora improved symptoms of anxiety. These researchers also reported that 36% of the studies using probiotics as the intervention were effective, while 86% of the studies in which non-probiotics were used were effective. In their systematic review, Liu et al. [75] analyzed 34 controlled clinical trials in which the effects of pre- and probiotics on depression and anxiety were studied. They concluded that prebiotics showed no significant differences from placebo for depression or anxiety, but probiotics showed small significant effects for both depression and anxiety. Chao et al. [77], in a meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials, found that probiotics reduced depressive symptoms in patients with anxiety and depression and in healthy people under stress, but there was no reduction in anxiety scores. Noonan et al. [76] studied depressive and anxiety symptoms in hemodialysis patients receiving supplementation with a probiotic or synbiotic (combination of pre- and probiotics) for 12 weeks. There was no decrease in anxiety relative to placebo in the probiotic group, but anxiety was reduced in the synbiotic group. Taylor and Holscher [83] carried out a literature review on dietary and microbial connections to depression, anxiety and stress and concluded that fructooligosaccharide and galactooligosaccharide prebiotics in doses ≥ 5 g daily improved anxiety and depression and led to the enrichment of fecal Bifidobacterium and that consumption of probiotics improved measures of depression, anxiety or stress in people predisposed to a mood disorder. Smith et al. [84] did a systematic review of studies in which participants consumed probiotics, prebiotics or synbiotics and were evaluated for mood or stress levels at the beginning and end of the study. Of the 12 studies investigated, 6 reported reduced depression with probiotics and 2 reported reduced anxiety with probiotics. In a small 8-week clinical study, Eskandarzadeh et al. [116] showed a greater decrease in anxiety in patients treated with a combination of a probiotic and the antidepressant sertraline compared to those patients treated with sertraline alone. In a study on 64 healthy females, Johnstone et al. [82] reported that administration of a galacto-saccharides prebiotic for 4 weeks increased fecal Bifidobacterium abundance and reduced symptoms of anxiety. In a comprehensive review of microbiota imbalance in patients with anxiety and eating disorders and on probiotics, Navarro-Tapia et al. [87] concluded that probiotics were more effective in reducing anxiety the higher the baseline anxiety level of the individual. In a small study done by Chinna Meyyappan et al. [117] on 12 patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and/or GAD (8 had MDD and GAD), patients consumed encapsulated MET-2 (contained 40 strains of bacteria purified and lab-grown from the stool of a healthy donor) once daily for 8 weeks; 9 of the patients showed improvement of depression and/or GAD.

3 PANIC DISORDER AND SOCIAL ANXIETY DISORDER

Although these two disorders have high prevalence [118], there is only limited specific information available in the literature on their interactions with the gut microbiome. Quagliato et al. [119] reported that an elevation of the kynurenine/tryptophan (KYN/tryptophan) ratio in panic disorder (PD) patients is predictive of poor short-term auditory memory. KYN is a major product of tryptophan metabolism and the precursor for several other indolic metabolites, including quinolinic acid, which has neurotoxic effects [120] and kynurenic acid (KYNA), which is a glutamate receptor antagonist [121]. Extensive metabolism of tryptophan is carried out by gut microbiota [122].

Quagliato and Nardi [123], in a systematic review, concluded that serum levels of the proinflammatory cytokines interleukin-6 (IL-6) and IL-1β were increased in PD patients. In a study on 41 PD patients (11 men and 30 women), in which levels of proinflammatory cytokines and cortisol were measured in saliva, it was found that levels of IL-1β, IL-12 and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were negatively correlated with cortisol levels [124]; the authors concluded that in PD patients the inflammatory response related to the altered microbiome-gut-brain axis is associated with HPA axis reactivity and may influence the maintenance of anxiety. Although there is a paucity of information on the gut microbiota in PD, alterations in oral microbiota have been reported [125]. There is a large microbiota community in the mouth, and oral microbiome composition has been reported to be associated with adolescent anxiety and depression symptoms [126]. Xie et al. [125] carried out 16S rRNA sequencing on the oral microbiota of 26 patients and 40 healthy controls. They found higher alpha diversity (balance and evenness) in PD patients than in healthy controls and differences between the two groups in composition of the oral microbiota. The mean abundances of the genera Prevotella and Veillonella were observed to be higher in the PD patients than in the healthy controls. It was found that the PD patients and healthy controls differed in the relative abundance of 61 genera. These authors also commented on the reciprocal relationship between PD and the oral microbiota and suggested that PD activates the HPA axis and thereby alters the oral microbial composition.

Butler et al. [122] found that the peripheral KYN pathway is altered in social anxiety disorder (SAD), with synthesis being directed preferentially to KYNA synthesis. Relative to healthy controls, SAD patients had elevated plasma levels of KYNA and an increased KYNA/KYN ratio. SAD patients with a history of suicide attempts had increased KYN levels and KYN/tryptophan ratio when compared to those with no such history. These authors found no differences in plasma levels of proinflammatory cytokines between the two groups, but lower levels of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 were observed in male SAD patients compared to healthy male controls (no such difference was seen between female SAD patients and healthy female controls) [122]. They speculated that the concentration of KYNA in the periphery could be influenced by the gut microbiota, which is known to produce KYNA [127] and inhibit its catabolism [128-130].

4 POST-TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER (PTSD)

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), a trauma- and stressor-related disorder, stands alone from other psychiatric disorders as it is the only diagnosis with a known cause -- a direct or indirect exposure to trauma. The exposure can occur either by having a direct experience or witnessing or hearing about repeated traumas and includes actual or threatened death, serious injury or physical violence, sexual violence, or involvement in war, either as a combatant or as a civilian. Motor vehicle accidents and medical traumas are also included, and exposure to natural or man-made disasters is also commonly associated with the development of PTSD. PTSD is characterized by symptom clusters directly associated with the traumatic event. Intrusion symptoms causing distress include memories, vivid dreams and dissociative reactions such as flashbacks, and intense alterations in arousal and physiological reactivity to reminders of the traumatic event are common. Persistent avoidance of situations, places and people linked to the event is also associated with the disorder [131].

Data on the composition of the gut microbiome and microbiota diversity and their relationship to symptoms associated with PTSD are limited. Considering these clinical limitations, the use of a single prolonged stress (SPS) model in rats has been helpful to simulate the behavioural manifestations of PTSD that are present in humans [132] and to examine acute stress-related changes to the microbiome [133]. The model simulates the stress process by exposing the animals to stressors that include bodily restraint, forced swimming and ether exposure [132]. Zhou et al. examined the correlation of gut microbiota with behaviour and neurotransmitters in an SPS rat model of PTSD. Behavioural results showed that SPS model rats had significantly increased fear behaviour (measured by mean freezing time) and lower mean times within the parameters measured of the open field test, indicating that anxiety-like behaviour was successfully established under these experimental conditions. Levels of serotonin were significantly decreased, while dopamine (DA) and norepinephrine (NE) levels were increased in the cerebral cortex of the animals [133]. Similar results have been found in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex (PFC) of PTSD model rats [134]. As serotonin is an inhibitory neurotransmitter, this suggests that the model-exposed animals were in a hyper-excited state which can be synonymous with the arousal symptoms (hypervigilance, high startle response and physiological reactivity) associated with PTSD. Interestingly, there were also differences in the order, family and genus levels in the gut microbiota of SPS-model rats compared to controls. Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Cyanobacteria and Proteobacteria were the most relevant to the fear- and anxiety-like behaviours and the significant reduction in brain serotonin levels in the cerebral cortex of the SPS model rats [133]. This research demonstrates that PTSD-related behaviours influence the microbiome and impact neurotransmitter concentrations in a validated animal model of PTSD.

In human studies, changes to the gut microbiota and associated PTSD symptoms have been explored in different populations of PTSD-affected individuals. It has been suggested from translational and human research that an acute or chronic stress-induced imbalance in gut microbiota during the neonatal period may have direct effects on the immune and other physiological systems that make those individuals more susceptible to the development of PTSD [135]. Microbial diversity and community composition of the gut microbiome have been investigated in a South African sample of PTSD-affected individuals as compared to trauma-exposed (TE) controls, a particular population where trauma and violence are highly prevalent [136]. Differences were observed, and lower total abundances of the phyla Actinobacteria, Lentisphaerae and Verrcumicrobia [136] were associated with PTSD status.

In more recent times, the experience of the COVID-19 pandemic and the development of PTSD in frontline health care workers (FHWs) by exposure to unprecedented levels of stress has offered a unique opportunity for researchers to study the impact of chronic stress exposure and the gut-brain axis [137]. The influence of prolonged stressors on the gut microbiota and associated PTSD symptoms was investigated in FHWs working on COVID-19 isolation units in Wuhan, China. The mental burden and chronic fear of infection, depression, overwhelming workloads and exposure to unrelenting patient deaths that the FHWs were exposed to were severe. FHWs who worked for two months in specific COVID-19 isolation units were compared to second-line healthcare workers (SHWs) who treated non-COVID-19 infected patients in regular city hospitals. Gut microbiota and mental status after exposure to the COVID-19 frontline work were measured in FHWs immediately after they left the isolation units, after a two-week quarantine period, four weeks after returning home and again at six months after the frontline work. The results indicated that stress associated with frontline work disrupted the gut microbiome at day one as well as produced significant PTSD, anxiety, depression and sleep-related symptoms in FHW, which were more severe than in SHWs. Alpha microbiome diversities (amount of individual bacteria from each bacterial species) were significantly lower in FHWs than in SHWs, indicating that frontline work and the stress associated with it contributed to gut dysbiosis, which persisted during the 6-month follow-up. Fighting against COVID-19 induced long-term changes in gut microbiota underlying the development and recurrence of PTSD symptoms [137].

Symptoms associated with PTSD are often disabling, and to date, there are limited treatment options available. First-line treatments, such as the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), often fail to improve many of the target symptoms of PTSD. Prazosin, an α1-adrenoreceptor antagonist, was a promising candidate, particularly for reducing the occurrence of nightmares and other sleep-related symptoms [138]. Unfortunately, several studies have been unable to replicate these results [139]. D-Cycloserine and propranolol have been specifically used to target the fear circuitry associated with PTSD [140, 141], and synaptic-based strategies such as ketamine administration have also been tried [142]. Psychotherapy has also been used in conjunction with 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, “Ecstasy”) for adult patients with severe PTSD. MDMA has been used successfully in a number of clinical trials and found to be effective and well tolerated. Results have been so impressive that it led the FDA to grant the designation of Breakthrough Therapy for promising treatment in 2017 [143, 144]. A more recent clinical trial studied a flexible dose of MDMA (80 mg or 120 mg) or placebo, followed by a supplemental half-dose (1.5 to 2 hours later with a half-dose of 40 or 60 mg MDMA) administered during 12 weeks of treatment. The treatment period was preceded by 3 preparatory therapy sessions (designed to prepare the patient for the experience) and then the experimental sessions were followed by three integrated sessions of psychotherapy. The effect size of the MDMA-assisted therapy treatment as compared to the placebo/ therapy treatment in this clinical trial was also large at 0.91 and the within-group treatment effect (the effect of the therapy) was 2.1 in the MDMA group and 1.2 in the placebo group respectfully [145]. MDMA, when combined with psychotherapy, may increase tolerance to distressful memories and allow individuals to process the traumatic events without overwhelming symptoms. MDMA increases serotonin release and extracellular serotonin levels by binding to presynaptic serotonin transporters and it has been shown to enhance fear memory extinction and modify fear memory consolidation, retrieval and reconsolidation in mice primarily by an increase in the expression of BDNF in the amygdala [146, 147]. The amygdala involves extensive serotonergic innervation and so it is thought that MDMA’s therapeutic effects may involve modulation of amygdalar serotonin functioning that contributes to fear behaviours and the symptoms of PTSD [145]. MDMA may also impact the gut microbiome. Ridge et al. [148] studied the influence of the gut microbiome on the toxicologic effects of hyperthermia in MDMA in rats. Antibiotic treatment for 14 days prior to MDMA treatment was shown to reduce the number and composition of the cecal bacterial population in the animals but also was able to attenuate MDMA-mediated hyperthermia. MDMA also increased expression levels of TGR5 bile acid receptors and enriched the proportion of Proteus mirabilis strain in the ceca of those animals not pretreated with antibiotics. The findings suggest that there may be a contributing role of the gut microbiome in MDMA-mediated hyperthermia and that MDMA may also have direct effects on the gut microbiota composition [148].

Unfortunately, physical and medical disabilities such as cardiovascular disease, metabolic syndrome and diabetes mellitus type II are also common in PTSD and require substantial medical and long-term psychiatric support [149]. Other targets focused on inflammatory, metabolic and mitochondrial dysfunctional pathways (all highly associated with the microbiome) have been suggested as these somatic comorbidities are an understudied area of PTSD therapeutics [150]. Drug interventions targeting the microbiome, a key modulator of gut, immune and nervous system functioning, may have a benefit to PTSD-related symptoms, as has been demonstrated in depression and anxiety [116, 151-153]. To date, the use of probiotics has been limited in the treatment of PTSD; however, there is a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial using Lactobacillus rhamnosus, a gram-positive immunoregulatory species that has anti-inflammatory and immunoregulatory properties, that is planned as a probiotic intervention for Veterans with PTSD in the United States (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04150380) [154].

5 OBSESSIVE-COMPULSIVE DISORDER (OCD)

5.1 The Gut-brain Axis in OCD

The exact causes of OCD still remain unclear, but in recent years research has suggested that immune-mediated mechanisms may be important in at least some cases of OCD [155-159]. In human studies, gut microbiome deviations from normal have been characterized in OCD but also in pediatric autoimmune neuropsychiatric disorders associated with streptococcal infections (PANDAS, a pediatric syndrome in which there is a temporal association between streptococcal infection and acute onset of neuropsychiatric symptoms which include obsessions and compulsions as well as a constellation of cognitive, behavioural, and neurological disturbances [160-162]). In their narrative review on potential immune-microbiome mechanisms in OCD, Troyer et al. [155] note that early environmental risk factors for OCD have an overlap with crucial periods related to immune-microbiome development and propose that OCD could be related to the gut microbiome in the following ways: programming of cytokine production, increased trafficking of peripheral immune cells to the CNS and regulation of functioning of microglia. This review also provided comprehensive tables on animal and human studies relating the gut microbiome to OCD-like symptoms; early environmental exposures conferring risk for OCD and also affecting immune-microbiome development; various immune parameters associated with OCD and with changes in the gut microbiota composition in animals or humans; and animal models with potential translation to clinical studies on the immune system and the gut microbiome in OCD [155].

5.2 Specific Studies Demonstrating an Altered Microbiome in OCD

A key preclinical study highlighting the differences in microbial composition between obsessive compulsive phenotype deer mice and control type was conducted by Scheepers et al. [163]. Specifically, they looked at large nest building as a naturally occurring obsessive compulsive phenotype; this is thought to be a maladaptive behavior of lab mice that confers no survival advantage in the laboratory environment, likely is excessive and expressed at the cost of other functions, and it has been shown to respond to SSRIs [163]. They compared fecal samples between 11 mice with this phenotype to 11 mice without and found the former to demonstrate higher loading of Desulfovermiculus, Aestuariispira, Peptococcus and Holdemanella, while the latter showed higher loading of Prevotella and Anaeroplasma, both of which have anti-inflammatory effects [163].

Two clinical studies using RNA sequencing made comparisons between the stool samples of human OCD patients versus healthy controls. Turna et al. [162] found their OCD group (n = 21) compared to controls (n = 22) had lower alpha diversity and specifically lower relative abundance of three butyrate-producing genera (Oscillopsira, Odoribacter and Anaerostipes) known to be anti-inflammatory [106, 160]. In addition, they found mean elevations of the inflammatory marker C-reactive protein (CRP) in OCD patients that were associated with the degree of their symptoms [162]. Domenech et al. [164] found that in their OCD group (n = 32) compared to controls (n = 32), there was also a similar decrease in alpha diversity [164]. They found increased abundance of the Rikenellaceae family associated with MDD and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) as well as gut inflammation [164]. These researchers also found a decrease in the Coprococcus genus associated with 3,4- dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) synthesis, a major step in the catabolism of DA. Given that dopaminergic neurotransmission is implicated in OCD, alterations in the metabolism of DA may be a causal link between the decrease in Coprococcus and OCD [164].

As further support for these clinical findings, a meta-analysis of 59 case-control studies showed that in adult populations with a range of psychiatric disorders, including MDD, bipolar disorder (BD), schizophrenia, anxiety, OCD, anorexia nervosa, PTSD, and ADHD, there was an overall significant decrease in alpha richness (total number of bacterial species) and a non-significant decrease in alpha diversity [106]. Additionally, they showed that the psychiatric populations had a reduction in anti-inflammatory butyrate-producing bacteria and an increase in pro-inflammatory genera [106].

Furthermore, there has been evidence that suggests acute streptococcal infection leads to the selection of proinflammatory strains of bacteria in children aged 4-8 years old diagnosed with PANDAS. Quagliariello et al. [165] found that in their PANDAS group (n = 30) compared to controls (n = 70), the former had significantly decreased bacterial diversity with an increase in abundance of the phylum Bacteroidetes, leading to a decreased Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio [165] which has been associated with intestinal inflammation [166]. It was proposed that this imbalance in gut bacteria ultimately leads to the neuropsychiatric manifestations of PANDAS through the gut-brain axis [165].

It has been postulated by Rees [167] that the use of antibiotics in children with streptococcal infection may lead to the initial gut microbiome imbalance, allowing opportunistic pathogens to thrive, which then creates susceptibility to the development of PANDAS [167]. This theory appears to be in contrast to the theory of PANDAS as a post-infectious phenomenon where antibodies produced through molecular mimicry target the basal ganglia, resulting in OCD symptoms [163, 165, 168]. It also seems to go against what is known in terms of treatment for PANDAS, which involves primarily early and aggressive treatment with antibiotics to control the infection, followed by anti-inflammatory and or psychotropic therapy [169]. Whether the observed gut microbiome imbalance in PANDAS is a direct result of infection or antimicrobials or occurs in the context of a pre-existing condition rendering the individual susceptible to an acute insult warrant further investigation.

5.3 Studies that Demonstrate Protective effect of Probiotics on OCD

Given that the above studies suggest a potential causative link between pro-inflammatory gut microbiome profiles and OCD, it stands to reason that perhaps probiotics can have a protective effect by restoring the gut microbial balance. Probiotics have previously been shown to have benefits in inflammatory gastrointestinal (GI) disorders such as inflammatory bowel syndrome (IBS) and diarrhea [166], and thus improving gut inflammation may reduce OCD symptoms via the gut-brain axis.

Two significant preclinical studies in rodent models have demonstrated improvement in OCD symptoms with the administration of probiotics. Kantak et al. [170] found that oral gavage of house mice with the probiotic bacterium L. Rhamnosus at a density of 109 CFU/day for 2 weeks was able to attenuate OCD-like behaviors such as stereotypic movements and marble burying. The OCD-like behaviors were induced with RU 24969 (5HT1A/1B receptor agonist shown previously to exacerbate OCD symptoms in humans) and have been shown to be responsive to serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) [170]. L. Rhamnosus administration was found to be comparable to the SSRI antidepressant fluoxetine at 10 mg/kg for 4 weeks in attenuating OCD-like behaviour [170]. Similarly, Sanikhani et al. [171] found that rats with OCD behaviors induced via injections with quinpirole (a DA agonist) showed an improvement in OCD signs when fed the probiotic Lactobacillus casei Shirota at 109 CF/g/day for 4 weeks, as compared to normal saline [171]. This improvement was also comparable to that of treatment with fluoxetine at 10 mg/kg for 4 weeks [171]. In addition, they found that levels of BDNF (a neurotrophic factor that enhances cellular proliferation, survival rate, and differentiation) in the orbitofrontal cortex (thought to be part of the neurocircuitry implicated in OCD) decreased initially with quinpirole induction of OCD behaviors, but then increased significantly after treatment with either L. casei Shirota or fluoxetine [171].

In human studies, Messaoudi et al. [112] found that administration of a probiotic formulation consisting of Lactobacillus helveticus and Bifidobacterium longum for 30 days to a group of 10 healthy human volunteers resulted in decreases in the obsessive-compulsive subscale of the Hopkins symptoms checklist (HSCL-90) as compared to 15 controls [112]. Kobliner et al. reported on a case study of a 15-year-old boy with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), OCD, tics, and self-injurious behavior, complicated by a history of GI disturbances and global immune dysfunction. They found that administration of S. boulardii up to 72 billion CFU/day resulted in decreased OCD and self-injurious (head-banging) behavior [172]. For further discussion of the studies in OCD mentioned above, readers are referred to a recent review by Marazziti et al. [85].

In summary, these studies provide early evidence of the potential benefits of probiotics for OCD symptoms. Despite SSRIs being the primary treatment for OCD, the response rate has been cited as only around 40-60% [170] and these drugs may present with serious side effects including sexual dysfunction [170]. The advent of probiotics, several of which have been reported to support a healthy microbiota, modulate immune responses, and to improve OCD-like behaviours in animal models and humans [112, 170-172], may transform the treatment paradigm of OCD.

5.4 Effects of Antidepressants used to Treat OCD on the Gut Microbiome

Interestingly, it appears that the use of common SRIs has also been associated with altered gut microbiomes [173], thereby raising the question of whether they may exert their therapeutic effects for OCD partially through the gut-brain axis. The mechanism has been postulated to be through their broad-spectrum antimicrobial properties, for instance, towards Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas, Enterococcus, and Clostridium [173]. Sertraline is thought to have the most potent antimicrobial activity; its proposed mechanism is via the inhibition of efflux pumps in bacterial cells [173].

Lukic et al. [174] conducted a study on BALB/c mice, a strain displaying higher depressive-like behaviour and anxiety relative to other strains. They found that treating mice chronically (21 days) with fluoxetine, escitalopram (SSRIs), venlafaxine, duloxetine (serotonin-NE reuptake inhibitors, SNRIs), or desipramine (a strong NE reuptake inhibitor) resulted in reduced richness (except in the case of desipramine) and increased beta diversity; in particular, they reduced abundances of Ruminococcus, Adlercreutzia and an unclassified Alphaproteobacteria. [174]. They then supplemented mice treated with duloxetine with Ruminococcus flavefaciens and found that this counteracted duloxetine’s diminution of depressive symptoms [174]. The exact mechanism(s) by which Ruminococcus leads to more depressive symptoms is unclear, but the treatment of the mice with R. flavefaciens upregulated genes involved in mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and down-regulated genes involved in neuroplasticity and also led to a decrease of serotonin and NE levels in the medial PFC [174].

6 DISCUSSION: CHALLENGES AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Although the findings in recent years on the gut-brain axis are exciting and hold great promise for furthering our understanding of the etiology of psychiatric disorders and of improving treatment of these disorders, this is a very complex area of research with many problems still to overcome [88, 115]. When studying the gut microbiome and its interactions with the brain, sex and strain differences in animal models must be taken into consideration [96, 175], as should the possibility that other organs such as the spleen may also have effects on the brain and stress-related disorders by modulating the immune system [176-178]. In humans, further studies must be done on sex-dependent differences in the composition of the gut microbiome and how these relate to anxiety and depression [1, 5, 25, 86]. Malan-Muller et al. [13] have provided a comprehensive discussion of potential pitfalls in the design of studies on the gut-brain axis.

Much still remains to be known about how metabolites formed by the gut microbiota that do not cross the BBB affect the brain, although studies on interactions with the vagus nerve are providing important information [20, 34, 107]. Animal models are very useful when studying such problems and trying to tease out other complex interactions among the gut microbiome, the immune system, the autonomic, enteric and endocrine systems and the brain. Animal models are also useful in increasing our knowledge of interactions of the gut microbiome not only with neurons but with glia [50, 179-181]. However, as is often the case with psychiatric disorders, translating from animal models to clinical situations can be problematic. For example, based on animal work, supplementation with SFCAs looks promising for improving anxiety-like and depression-like symptoms, but now more information about translatability to humans, particularly across the lifespan, must be obtained [48].

Great strides have been taken in clinical work on the importance of the gut-brain axis in anxiety disorders, PTSD and OCD, but there are also numerous obstacles to be overcome. These disorders are often comorbid with many other disorders, and future clinical trials must take this into account as well as the sex and drug profile of the patient, length of the trial, diet, exercise and the study populations used [5, 17, 38, 69, 81, 83, 182, 183]. Study populations are important not only from a genetic standpoint but from a bio-psycho-socio-environmental perspective since the gut microbiome may be affected by factors such as lifestyle and increased urbanization; modern urban lifestyles may result in decreased exposure to microbes early in life and result in an underdeveloped immune system and increased risk of inflammation in later life [5, 184], possibly being a risk factor for developing mood and anxiety disorders. Each person’s microbiota profile is unique and may be affected by diet [69, 81, 83, 90, 185]. This uniqueness may in fact, be important in future studies on precision health [90], but we need more specific information about which antianxiety and antidepressant drugs affect particular microbes and the effects of an individual’s genetics on the gut microbiome. Although early studies are promising [186], further information is required to determine if knowledge of the gut microbiome can be used to provide differential diagnoses of disorders like GAD and depression.

Although a great deal of exciting research on the effects of pro- and prebiotics on behaviour has been reported, more knowledge is required on the composition of such preparations that will provide the best therapy for specific disorders [86]. Future studies could use brain imaging methods to examine the effects of various techniques, such as the administration of pro- and prebiotics, used to alter the gut microbiome to see the effects of these techniques on brain function [13, 88, 187]. More information is also required on the influence of alterations of the gut microbiome on specific brain regions such as the amygdala [25]. Although it has been proposed that microRNAs may be potential biomarkers of some psychiatric disorders, there is a necessity to acquire increased knowledge of the effects of exercise and diet on the composition of the gut microbiome and the subsequent effects of excretion of these microRNAs in stools [183]. A major concern that has arisen over the last couple of years has been the long-term effects of COVID-19 on the occurrence of mental health issues; there should be similar concerns on the effects of COVID-19 on the composition of the microbiome in the gut [37, 188]. For example, Yeoh et al. [189] obtained blood, stool and patient records from COVID-19 patients and found interesting differences between the patients and non-COVID individuals; the patients had a depletion of gut bacteria with immunomodulatory potential, and the dysbiotic composition of the gut microbiota was still evident at 30 days after clearance of the virus. These researchers also found that the composition of the gut microbiota in the patients was concordant with the severity of the disease and with elevated concentrations of several inflammatory cytokines, chemokines and several blood markers of tissue damage [189]. As mentioned previously (section 4.0) in the current review, frontline workers in COVID-19 isolation units in China have been reported to have gut dysbiosis, which was still evident at a 6-month followup [137]. Fecal microbiota transplantation to treat various conditions, including psychiatric disorders, is an area of great interest, and this topic is discussed in detail in recent review articles [190-192].

In recent years, there has been considerable criticism expressed about the effectiveness of the DSM and the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), which are based on presenting signs and symptoms, in diagnosis of psychiatric disorders because of the heterogeneity of these disorders and the high incidence of co-occurring (co-morbid) disorders. As a result, there is now a strong movement investigating placing more emphasis on neurobiological and behavioural systems in diagnosis and on focusing on personalized health [193-197]. The gut microbiome-brain axis may have an important role in this regard in the future, particularly as technological advances are being made in studying the composition and possible editing of the microbiome [6, 90, 198] and in nutritional neuroscience [199-201]. The findings from such work could also provide physiological explanations for the high incidence of co-morbidities of psychiatric disorders with each other [106] and with other medical conditions [202].

Despite all the challenges mentioned above, research on the gut-brain axis has been a very active and exciting area of endeavor in biological psychiatry over the past two decades and holds promise for increasing our knowledge of the etiology of a variety of stress-related psychiatric disorders, including anxiety disorders, PTSD and OCD, and for providing much-needed biomarkers and improved therapy in the future. Data on the gut-brain axis should become more meaningful as the costs for shotgun metagenomic sequencing and metabolomics continue to fall.

CONCLUSION

Research on the possible involvement of the gut microbiome-immune system-brain axis in stress-induced disorders such as those described in this review paper is exciting and suggests the possibility of learning more about the etiology of these disorders and providing urgently needed new targets for improved treatment. Many challenges in areas such as comorbidity, improvement of experimental design (e.g., with regard to sex, drug profiles, ethnicity/race), environmental effects, the effects of drugs on specific microbes, and translation of findings on animal models to the clinical situation remain, but the findings to date provide strong evidence for directions to take to deal with these challenges in the future.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors are grateful to Tricia Kent and Trudy Valliere for expert secretarial assistance.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

GBB, MM and BHY did the literature search, all authors contributed to the writing and editing of the manuscript and all authors approved the final version of the manuscript that was submitted.

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

4-EPS 4-Ethylphenyl Sulfate

5-HT 5-Hydroxytryptamine

AD Alzheimer’s Disease

ADHD Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

AhR Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor

ASD Autism Spectrum Disorder

BBB Blood-brain Barrier

BD Bipolar Disorder

BDNF Brain-derived Neurotrophic Factor

CNS Central Nervous System

CRF Corticotropin-releasing Factor

CRP C-reactive Protein

DA Dopamine

DOPAC 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylacetic Acid

DSM Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

FGID Functional Gastrointestinal Disease

FHWs Frontline Healthcare Workers

GABA γ-Aminobutyric Acid

GAD Generalized Anxiety Disorder

GI Gastrointestinal

GLP-1 Glucagon-like Peptide

HPA Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal

HSCL-90 Hopkins Symptoms Checklist

IBS Inflammatory Bowel Disease

ICD International Classification of Diseases

IDO Indoleamine-2,3-deoxygenase

IL Interleukin

KYN Kynurenine

KYNA Kynurenic Acid

LPS Lipopolysaccharide

MDD Major Depressive Disorder

MDMA 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (“Ecstasy”)

NAS N-acetylserotonin

NE Norepinephrine

OCD Obsessive-compulsive Disorder

PANDAS Pediatric Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Disorders Associated with Streptococcal Infections

PD Panic Disorder

PDC Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Complex

PTSD Post-traumatic Stress Disorder

SAD Social Anxiety Disorder

SCFA Short Chain Fatty Acid

SHWs Second-line Healthcare Workers

SNRI Serotonin-norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor

SPS Single Prolonged Stress

SRIs Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

SSRIs Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

TCA Tricarboxylic Acid

TE Trauma-exposed

TRP Tryptophan

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Not applicable.

FUNDING

The Department of Psychiatry and Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta. GBB had funding from the Distinguished University Professor fund and a TRIP research allowance (TRP-GB).

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.

Fig. (1) A schematic diagram of the gut microbiome-immune system-brain axis (adapted from Foster and McVey Neufeld [1] with author approval and with copyright clearance from the publisher (Elsevier)). Abbreviations: GI = gastrointestinal, CNS = central nervous sytem, HPA = hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal, ANS = autonomic nervous sytem, SCFAs = short chain fatty acids.

Fig. (2) Chemical structures of the short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) acetic acid (a), propionic acid (b) and butyric acid (c) and of 4-ethylphenyl sulfate (4-EPS) (d). The structures were located on a Google Search and drawn using ChemDraw.
==== Refs
REFERENCES

1 Foster J.A. McVey Neufeld K.A. Gut–brain axis: How the microbiome influences anxiety and depression. Trends Neurosci. 2013 36 5 305 312 10.1016/j.tins.2013.01.005 23384445
2 Sylvia K.E. Demas G.E. A gut feeling: Microbiome-brain-immune interactions modulate social and affective behaviors. Horm. Behav. 2018 99 41 49 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2018.02.001 29427583
3 Caspani G. Kennedy S. Foster J.A. Swann J. Gut microbial metabolites in depression: Understanding the biochemical mechanisms. Microb. Cell 2019 6 10 454 481 10.15698/mic2019.10.693 31646148
4 McEwen B.S. Protection and damage from acute and chronic stress: Allostasis and allostatic overload and relevance to the pathophysiology of psychiatric disorders. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2004 1032 1 1 7 10.1196/annals.1314.001 15677391
5 Peirce J.M. Alviña K. The role of inflammation and the gut microbiome in depression and anxiety. J. Neurosci. Res. 2019 97 10 1223 1241 10.1002/jnr.24476 31144383
6 Butler M.I. Morkl S. Sandhu K.V. Cryan J.F. Dinan T.G. The gut microbiome and mental health; what shall we tell our patients? Can. J. Psychiatry 2019 64 11 737 760 10.1177/0706743719874168 31530002
7 Flux M.C. Lowry C.A. Finding intestinal fortitude: Integrating the microbiome into a holistic view of depression mechanisms, treatment, and resilience. Neurobiol. Dis. 2020 135 104578 10.1016/j.nbd.2019.104578 31454550
8 Powell N. Walker M.M. Talley N.J. The mucosal immune system: Master regulator of bidirectional gut–brain communications. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017 14 3 143 159 10.1038/nrgastro.2016.191 28096541
9 Farzi A. Fröhlich E.E. Holzer P. Gut microbiota and the neuroendocrine system. Neurotherapeutics 2018 15 1 5 22 10.1007/s13311-017-0600-5 29380303
10 Kelly C.J. Zheng L. Campbell E.L. Saeedi B. Scholz C.C. Bayless A.J. Wilson K.E. Glover L.E. Kominsky D.J. Magnuson A. Weir T.L. Ehrentraut S.F. Pickel C. Kuhn K.A. Lanis J.M. Nguyen V. Taylor C.T. Colgan S.P. Crosstalk between microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids and intestinal epithelial HIF augments tissue barrier function. Cell Host Microbe 2015 17 5 662 671 10.1016/j.chom.2015.03.005 25865369
11 Cryan J.F. Dinan T.G. Mind-altering microorganisms: The impact of the gut microbiota on brain and behaviour. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2012 13 10 701 712 10.1038/nrn3346 22968153
12 Liang S. Wu X. Jin F. Gut-brain psychology: Rethinking psychology from the microbiota-gut-brain axis. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 2018 12 33 10.3389/fnint.2018.00033 30271330
13 Malan-Muller S. Valles-Colomer M. Raes J. Lowry C.A. Seedat S. Hemmings S.M.J. The gut microbiome and mental health: Implications for anxiety- and trauma-related disorders. OMICS 2018 22 2 90 107 10.1089/omi.2017.0077 28767318
14 Hayes C.L. Peters B.J. Foster J.A. Microbes and mental health: Can the microbiome help explain clinical heterogeneity in psychiatry? Front. Neuroendocrinol. 2020 58 100849 10.1016/j.yfrne.2020.100849 32497560
15 Ouabbou S. He Y. Butler K. Tsuang M. Inflammation in mental disorders: Is the microbiota the missing link? Neurosci. Bull. 2020 36 9 1071 1084 10.1007/s12264-020-00535-1 32592144
16 Foster J.A. Is anxiety associated with the gut microbiota? Mod. Trends Psychiat. 2021 32 68 73 10.1159/000510418 34032646
17 Simpson C.A. Diaz-Arteche C. Eliby D. Schwartz O.S. Simmons J.G. Cowan C.S.M. The gut microbiota in anxiety and depression – A systematic review. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2021 83 101943 10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101943 33271426
18 Tannock G.W. Savage D.C. Influences of dietary and environmental stress on microbial populations in the murine gastrointestinal tract. Infect. Immun. 1974 9 3 591 598 10.1128/iai.9.3.591-598.1974 4593471
19 Bailey M.T. Dowd S.E. Galley J.D. Hufnagle A.R. Allen R.G. Lyte M. Exposure to a social stressor alters the structure of the intestinal microbiota: Implications for stressor-induced immunomodulation. Brain Behav. Immun. 2011 25 3 397 407 10.1016/j.bbi.2010.10.023 21040780
20 Cussotto S. Sandhu K.V. Dinan T.G. Cryan J.F. The neuroendocrinology of the microbiota-gut-brain axis: A behavioural perspective. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 2018 51 80 101 10.1016/j.yfrne.2018.04.002 29753796
21 Jaworska-Andryszewska P. Rybakowski J.K. Childhood trauma in mood disorders: Neurobiological mechanisms and implications for treatment. Pharmacol. Rep. 2019 71 1 112 120 10.1016/j.pharep.2018.10.004 30544098
22 Madison A. Kiecolt-Glaser J.K. Stress, depression, diet, and the gut microbiota: Human–bacteria interactions at the core of psychoneuroimmunology and nutrition. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 2019 28 105 110 10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.01.011 32395568
23 Misiak B. Łoniewski, I.; Marlicz, W.; Frydecka, D.; Szulc, A.; Rudzki, L.; Samochowiec,The HPA axis dysregulation in severe mental illness: Can we shift the blame to gut microbiota? Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2020 102 109951 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.109951 32335265
24 Rinninella E. Raoul P. Cintoni M. Franceschi F. Miggiano G. Gasbarrini A. Mele M. What is the healthy gut microbiota composition? A changing ecosystem across age, environment, diet, and diseases. Microorganisms 2019 7 1 14 10.3390/microorganisms7010014 30634578
25 Cryan J.F. O’Riordan K.J. Cowan C.S.M. Sandhu K.V. Bastiaanssen T.F.S. Boehme M. Codagnone M.G. Cussotto S. Fulling C. Golubeva A.V. Guzzetta K.E. Jaggar M. Long-Smith C.M. Lyte J.M. Martin J.A. Molinero-Perez A. Moloney G. Morelli E. Morillas E. O’Connor R. Cruz-Pereira J.S. Peterson V.L. Rea K. Ritz N.L. Sherwin E. Spichak S. Teichman E.M. van de Wouw M. Ventura-Silva A.P. Wallace-Fitzsimons S.E. Hyland N. Clarke G. Dinan T.G. The microbiota-gut-brain axis. Physiol. Rev. 2019 99 4 1877 2013 10.1152/physrev.00018.2018 31460832
26 Foster J.A. Modulating brain function with microbiota. Science 2022 376 6596 936 937 10.1126/science.abo4220 35617384
27 Choden T. Cohen N.A. The gut microbiome and the immune system. Explor. Med. 2022 3 219 233 10.37349/emed.2022.00087
28 Rudzki L. Maes M. The microbiota-gut-immune-glia (MGIG) axis in major depression. Mol. Neurobiol. 2020 57 10 4269 4295 10.1007/s12035-020-01961-y 32700250
29 Gareau M.G. Microbial endocrinology: The microbiota-gut-brain axis in health and disease. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2014 817 39 71 24997029
30 Bravo J.A. Forsythe P. Chew M.V. Escaravage E. Savignac H.M. Dinan T.G. Bienenstock J. Cryan J.F. Ingestion of Lactobacillus strain regulates emotional behavior and central GABA receptor expression in a mouse via the vagus nerve. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011 108 38 16050 16055 10.1073/pnas.1102999108 21876150
31 Baganz N.L. Blakely R.D. A dialogue between the immune system and brain, spoken in the language of serotonin. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2013 4 1 48 63 10.1021/cn300186b 23336044
32 Auteri M. Zizzo M.G. Serio R. GABA and GABA receptors in the gastrointestinal tract: From motility to inflammation. Pharmacol. Res. 2015 93 11 21 10.1016/j.phrs.2014.12.001 25526825
33 Desbonnet L. Garrett L. Clarke G. Bienenstock J. Dinan T.G. The probiotic Bifidobacteria infantis: An assessment of potential antidepressant properties in the rat. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2008 43 2 164 174 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2008.03.009 18456279
34 Breit S. Kupferberg A. Rogler G. Hasler G. Vagus nerve as modulator of the brain-gut axis in psychiatric and inflammatory disorders. Front. Psychiatry 2018 9 44 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00044 29593576
35 Pourhamzeh M. Moravej F.G. Arabi M. Shahriari E. Mehrabi S. Ward R. Ahadi R. Joghataei M.T. The roles of serotonin in neuropsychiatric disorders. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2022 42 6 1671 1692 10.1007/s10571-021-01064-9 33651238
36 Anderson G. Maes M. Local melatonin regulates inflammation resolution: A common factor in neurodegenerative, psychiatric and systemic inflammatory disorders. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets 2014 13 5 817 827 10.2174/1871527313666140711091400 25012620
37 Anderson G. Reiter R.J. COVID-19 pathophysiology: Interactions of gut microbiome, melatonin, vitamin D, stress, kynurenine and the alpha 7 nicotinic receptor: Treatment implications. Melatonin Res. 2020 3 3 322 345 10.32794/mr11250066
38 Badawy A.A.B. Tryptophan availability for kynurenine pathway metabolism across the life span: Control mechanisms and focus on aging, exercise, diet and nutritional supplements. Neuropharmacology 2017 112 Pt B 248 263 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2015.11.015 26617070
39 Le Floc’h N. Otten W. Merlot E. Tryptophan metabolism, from nutrition to potential therapeutic applications. Amino Acids 2011 41 5 1195 1205 10.1007/s00726-010-0752-7 20872026
40 Richard D.M. Dawes M.A. Mathias C.W. Acheson A. Hill-Kapturczak N. Dougherty D.M. L-Tryptophan: Basic metabolic functions, behavioral research and therapeutic indications. Int. J. Tryptophan Res. 2009 2 IJTR.S2129 10.4137/IJTR.S2129 20651948
41 Waclawiková B. El Aidy S. Role of microbiota and tryptophan metabolites in the remote effect of intestinal inflammation on brain and depression. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2018 11 3 63 10.3390/ph11030063 29941795
42 Ruddick J.P. Evans A.K. Nutt D.J. Lightman S.L. Rook G.A.W. Lowry C.A. Tryptophan metabolism in the central nervous system: Medical implications. Expert Rev. Mol. Med. 2006 8 20 1 27 10.1017/S1462399406000068 16942634
43 Rothhammer V. Mascanfroni I.D. Bunse L. Takenaka M.C. Kenison J.E. Mayo L. Chao C.C. Patel B. Yan R. Blain M. Alvarez J.I. Kébir H. Anandasabapathy N. Izquierdo G. Jung S. Obholzer N. Pochet N. Clish C.B. Prinz M. Prat A. Antel J. Quintana F.J. Type I interferons and microbial metabolites of tryptophan modulate astrocyte activity and central nervous system inflammation via the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Nat. Med. 2016 22 6 586 597 10.1038/nm.4106 27158906
44 Generoso J.S. Giridharan V.V. Lee J. Macedo D. Barichello T. The role of the microbiota-gut-brain axis in neuropsychiatric disorders. Br. J. Psychiatry 2021 43 3 293 305 10.1590/1516-4446-2020-0987 32667590
45 Serger E. Luengo-Gutierrez L. Chadwick J.S. Kong G. Zhou L. Crawford G. Danzi M.C. Myridakis A. Brandis A. Bello A.T. Müller F. Sanchez-Vassopoulos A. De Virgiliis F. Liddell P. Dumas M.E. Strid J. Mani S. Dodd D. Di Giovanni S. The gut metabolite indole-3 propionate promotes nerve regeneration and repair. Nature 2022 607 7919 585 592 10.1038/s41586-022-04884-x 35732737
46 Wei G.Z. Martin K.A. Xing P.Y. Agrawal R. Whiley L. Wood T.K. Hejndorf S. Ng Y.Z. Low J.Z.Y. Rossant J. Nechanitzky R. Holmes E. Nicholson J.K. Tan E.K. Matthews P.M. Pettersson S. Tryptophan-metabolizing gut microbes regulate adult neurogenesis via the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021 118 27 e2021091118 10.1073/pnas.2021091118 34210797
47 Stilling R.M. van de Wouw M. Clarke G. Stanton C. Dinan T.G. Cryan J.F. The neuropharmacology of butyrate: The bread and butter of the microbiota-gut-brain axis? Neurochem. Int. 2016 99 110 132 10.1016/j.neuint.2016.06.011 27346602
48 O’Riordan K.J. Collins M.K. Moloney G.M. Knox E.G. Aburto M.R. Fülling C. Morley S.J. Clarke G. Schellekens H. Cryan J.F. Short chain fatty acids: Microbial metabolites for gut-brain axis signalling. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2022 546 111572 10.1016/j.mce.2022.111572 35066114
49 Schroeder F.A. Lin C.L. Crusio W.E. Akbarian S. Antidepressant-like effects of the histone deacetylase inhibitor, sodium butyrate, in the mouse. Biol. Psychiatry 2007 62 1 55 64 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.06.036 16945350
50 Wang C. Zheng D. Weng F. Jin Y. He L. Sodium butyrate ameliorates the cognitive impairment of Alzheimer’s disease by regulating the metabolism of astrocytes. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 2022 239 1 215 227 10.1007/s00213-021-06025-0 34812899
51 Anderson G. Maes M. Gut dysbiosis dysregulates central and systemic homeostasis via suboptimal mitochondrial function: Assessment, treatment and classification implications. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2020 20 7 524 539 10.2174/1568026620666200131094445 32003689
52 Markus R.P. Fernandes P.A. Kinker G.S. da Silveira Cruz-Machado S. Marçola M. Immune-pineal axis - acute inflammatory responses coordinate melatonin synthesis by pinealocytes and phagocytes. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2018 175 16 3239 3250 10.1111/bph.14083 29105727
53 Muxel S.M. Pires-Lapa, M.A.; Monteiro, A.W.A.; Cecon, E.; Tamura, E.K.; Floeter-Winter, L.M.; Markus, R.P. NF-κB drives the synthesis of melatonin in RAW 264.7 macrophages by inducing the transcription of the arylalkylamine-N-acetyltransferase (AA-NAT) gene. PLoS One 2012 7 12 e52010 10.1371/journal.pone.0052010 23284853
54 Lach G. Schellekens H. Dinan T.G. Cryan J.F. Anxiety, depression, and the microbiome: A role for gut peptides. Neurotherapeutics 2018 15 1 36 59 10.1007/s13311-017-0585-0 29134359
55 Aresti Sanz J. El Aidy S. Microbiota and gut neuropeptides: A dual action of antimicrobial activity and neuroimmune response. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 2019 236 5 1597 1609 10.1007/s00213-019-05224-0 30997526
56 Needham B.D. Funabashi M. Adame M.D. Wang Z. Boktor J.C. Haney J. Wu W.L. Rabut C. Ladinsky M.S. Hwang S.J. Guo Y. Zhu Q. Griffiths J.A. Knight R. Bjorkman P.J. Shapiro M.G. Geschwind D.H. Holschneider D.P. Fischbach M.A. Mazmanian S.K. A gut-derived metabolite alters brain activity and anxiety behaviour in mice. Nature 2022 602 7898 647 653 10.1038/s41586-022-04396-8 35165440
57 Mayneris-Perxachs J. Castells-Nobau A. Arnoriaga-Rodríguez M. Martin M. de la Vega-Correa L. Zapata C. Burokas A. Blasco G. Coll C. Escrichs A. Biarnés C. Moreno-Navarrete J.M. Puig J. Garre-Olmo J. Ramos R. Pedraza S. Brugada R. Vilanova J.C. Serena J. Gich J. Ramió-Torrentà L. Pérez-Brocal V. Moya A. Pamplona R. Sol J. Jové M. Ricart W. Portero-Otin M. Deco G. Maldonado R. Fernández-Real J.M. Microbiota alterations in proline metabolism impact depression. Cell Metab. 2022 34 5 681 701.e10 10.1016/j.cmet.2022.04.001 35508109
58 Louis P. Flint H.J. Michel C. How to manipulate the microbiota. Prebiotics. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2016 902 119 142 10.1007/978-3-319-31248-4_9 27161355
59 Dinan T.G. Stanton C. Cryan J.F. Psychobiotics: A novel class of psychotropic. Biol. Psychiatry 2013 74 10 720 726 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.05.001 23759244
60 Allen A.P. Hutch W. Borre Y.E. Kennedy P.J. Temko A. Boylan G. Murphy E. Cryan J.F. Dinan T.G. Clarke G. Bifidobacterium longum 1714 as a translational psychobiotic: Modulation of stress, electrophysiology and neurocognition in healthy volunteers. Transl. Psychiatry 2016 6 11 e939 10.1038/tp.2016.191 27801892
61 Bambury A. Sandhu K. Cryan J.F. Dinan T.G. Finding the needle in the haystack: Systematic identification of psychobiotics. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2018 175 24 4430 4438 10.1111/bph.14127 29243233
62 Tremblay A. Lingrand L. Maillard M. Feuz B. Tompkins T.A. The effects of psychobiotics on the microbiota-gut-brain axis in early-life stress and neuropsychiatric disorders. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2021 105 110142 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.110142 33069817
63 Burokas A. Arboleya S. Moloney R.D. Peterson V.L. Murphy K. Clarke G. Stanton C. Dinan T.G. Cryan J.F. Targeting the microbiota gut-brain axis: Prebiotics have have anxiolytic and antidepressant-like effects and reverse the impact of chronic stress in mice. Biol. Psychiatry 2017 82 7 472 487 10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.12.031 28242013
64 Savignac H.M. Couch Y. Stratford M. Bannerman D.M. Tzortzis G. Anthony D.C. Burnet P.W.J. Prebiotic administration normalizes lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced anxiety and cortical 5-HT2A receptor and IL1-β levels in male mice. Brain Behav. Immun. 2016 52 120 131 10.1016/j.bbi.2015.10.007 26476141
65 Hosseinifard E.S. Morshedi M. Bavafa-Valenlia K. Saghafi-Asl M. The novel insight into anti-inflammatory and anxiolytic effects of psychobiotics in diabetic rats: Possible link between gut microbiota and brain regions. Eur. J. Nutr. 2019 58 8 3361 3375 10.1007/s00394-019-01924-7 30826905
66 Gall A.J. Griffin G.D. Anxiolytic effects of administration of a commercially available prebiotic blend of galacto-oligosaccharides and beta glucans in Sprague-Dawley rats. Benef. Microbes 2021 12 4 341 349 10.3920/BM2020.0169 34169805
67 Lalonde R. Strazielle C. Probiotic effects on anxiety-like behavior in animal models. Rev. Neurosci. 2022 33 6 691 701 10.1515/revneuro-2021-0173 35381125
68 Kambe J. Watcharin S. Makioka-Itaya Y. Inoue R. Watanabe G. Yamaguchi H. Nagaoka K. Heat-killed Enterococcus fecalis (EC-12) supplement alters the expression of neurotransmitter receptor genes in the prefrontal cortex and alleviates anxiety-like behavior in mice. Neurosci. Lett. 2020 720 134753 10.1016/j.neulet.2020.134753 31931033
69 Luna R.A. Foster J.A. Gut brain axis: Diet microbiota interactions and implications for modulation of anxiety and depression. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2015 32 35 41 10.1016/j.copbio.2014.10.007 25448230
70 Foster J.A. Rinaman L. Cryan J.F. Stress & the gut-brain axis: Regulation by the microbiome. Neurobiol. Stress 2017 7 124 136 10.1016/j.ynstr.2017.03.001 29276734
71 Marotta A. Sarno E. Del Casale A. Pane M. Mogna L. Amoruso A. Felis G.E. Fiorio M. Effects of probiotics on cognitive reactivity, mood, and sleep quality. Front. Psychiatry 2019 10 164 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00164 30971965
72 Yang H. Zhao X. Tang S. Huang H. Zhao X. Ning Z. Fu X. Zhang C. Probiotics reduce psychological stress in patients before laryngeal cancer surgery. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016 12 1 e92 e96 10.1111/ajco.12120 24571169
73 Akkasheh G. Kashani-Poor Z. Tajabadi-Ebrahimi M. Jafari P. Akbari H. Taghizadeh M. Memarzadeh M.R. Asemi Z. Esmaillzadeh A. Clinical and metabolic response to probiotic administration in patients with major depressive disorder: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Nutrition 2016 32 3 315 320 10.1016/j.nut.2015.09.003 26706022
74 Rao A.V. Bested A.C. Beaulne T.M. Katzman M.A. Iorio C. Berardi J.M. Logan A.C. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study of a probiotic in emotional symptoms of chronic fatigue syndrome. Gut Pathog. 2009 1 1 6 10.1186/1757-4749-1-6 19338686
75 Liu R.T. Walsh R.F.L. Sheehan A.E. Prebiotics and probiotics for depression and anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2019 102 13 23 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.03.023 31004628
76 Noonan S. Zaveri M. Macaninch E. Martyn K. Food & mood: A review of supplementary prebiotic and probiotic interventions in the treatment of anxiety and depression in adults. BMJ Nutrition, Prev. Health 2020 3 e000053
77 Chao L. Liu C. Sutthawongwadee S. Li Y. Lv W. Chen W. Yu L. Zhou J. Guo A. Li Z. Guo S. Effects of probiotics on depressive or anxiety variables in healthy participants under stress conditions or with a depressive or anxiety diagnosis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front. Neurol. 2020 11 421 10.3389/fneur.2020.00421 32528399
78 Papalini S. Michels F. Kohn N. Wegman J. van Hemert S. Roelofs K. Arias-Vasquez A. Aarts E. Stress matters: Randomized controlled trial on the effect of probiotics on neurocognition. Neurobiol. Stress 2019 10 100141 10.1016/j.ynstr.2018.100141 30937347
79 Soldi S. Tagliacarne S.C. Valsecchi C. Perna S. Rondanelli M. Ziviani L. Milleri S. Annoni A. Castellazzi A. Effect of a multistrain probiotic (Lactoflorene® Plus) on inflammatory parameters and microbiota composition in subjects with stress-related symptoms. Neurobiol. Stress 2019 10 100138 10.1016/j.ynstr.2018.11.001 30937345
80 Haghighat N. Rajabi S. Mohammadshahi M. Effect of synbiotic and probiotic supplementation on serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor level, depression and anxiety symptoms in hemodialysis patients: A randomized, double-blinded, clinical trial. Nutr. Neurosci. 2021 24 6 490 499 10.1080/1028415X.2019.1646975 31379269
81 Taylor A.M. Thompson S.V. Edwards C.G. Musaad S.M.A. Khan N.A. Holscher H.D. Associations among diet, the gastrointestinal microbiota, and negative emotional states in adults. Nutr. Neurosci. 2020 23 12 983 992 10.1080/1028415X.2019.1582578 30794085
82 Johnstone N. Milesi C. Burn O. van den Bogert B. Nauta A. Hart K. Sowden P. Burnet P.W.J. Cohen K.K. Anxiolytic effects of a galacto-oligosaccharides prebiotic in healthy females (18-25 years) with corresponding changes in gut bacterial composition. Sci. Rep. 2021 11 1 8302 10.1038/s41598-021-87865-w 33859330
83 Taylor A.M. Holscher H.D. A review of dietary and microbial connections to depression, anxiety, and stress. Nutr. Neurosci. 2020 23 3 237 250 10.1080/1028415X.2018.1493808 29985786
84 Smith K.S. Greene M.W. Babu J.R. Frugé A.D. Psychobiotics as treatment for anxiety, depression, and related symptoms: A systematic review. Nutr. Neurosci. 2021 24 12 963 977 10.1080/1028415X.2019.1701220 31858898
85 Marazziti D. Buccianelli B. Palermo S. Parra E. Arone A. Beatino M. Massa L. Carpita B. Barberi F. Mucci F. Dell’Osso L. The microbiota/microbiome and the gut–brain axis: How much do they matter in psychiatry? Life (Basel) 2021 11 8 760 10.3390/life11080760 34440503
86 Snigdha S. Ha K. Tsai P. Dinan T.G. Bartos J.D. Shahid M. Probiotics: Potential novel therapeutics for microbiota-gut-brain axis dysfunction across gender and lifespan. Pharmacol. Ther. 2022 231 107978 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2021.107978 34492236
87 Navarro-Tapia E. Almeida-Toledano L. Sebastiani G. Serra-Delgado M. García-Algar Ó. Andreu-Fernández V. Effects of microbiota imbalance in anxiety and eating disorders: Probiotics as novel therapeutic approaches. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021 22 5 2351 10.3390/ijms22052351 33652962
88 Le Morvan de Sequeira C. Hengstberger C. Enck P. Mack I. Effect of probiotics on psychiatric symptoms and central nervous system functions in human health and disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrients 2022 14 3 621 10.3390/nu14030621 35276981
89 Zhou L. Foster J.A. Psychobiotics and the gut-brain axis: In the pursuit of happiness. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2015 11 715 723 25834446
90 Foster J.A. Decoding microbiome research for clinical psychiatry. Can. J. Psychiatry 2020 65 1 19 20 10.1177/0706743719890725 31777272
91 Sudo N. Chida Y. Aiba Y. Sonoda J. Oyama N. Yu X.N. Kubo C. Koga Y. Postnatal microbial colonization programs the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal system for stress response in mice. J. Physiol. 2004 558 1 263 275 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.063388 15133062
92 Heijtz R.D. Wang S. Anuar F. Qian Y. Björkholm B. Samuelsson A. Hibberd M.L. Forssberg H. Pettersson S. Normal gut microbiota modulates brain development and behavior. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011 108 7 3047 3052 10.1073/pnas.1010529108 21282636
93 Neufeld K.A.M. Kang N. Bienenstock J. Foster J.A. Effects of intestinal microbiota on anxiety-like behavior. Commun. Integr. Biol. 2011 4 4 492 494 10.4161/cib.15702 21966581
94 Neufeld K.M. Kang N. Bienenstock J. Foster J.A. Reduced anxiety-like behavior and central neurochemical change in germ-free mice. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2011 23 3 255 e119, e119 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2010.01620.x 21054680
95 Bercik P. Denou E. Collins J. Jackson W. Lu J. Jury J. Deng Y. Blennerhassett P. Macri J. McCoy K.D. Verdu E.F. Collins S.M. The intestinal microbiota affect central levels of brain-derived neurotropic factor and behavior in mice. Gastroenterology 2011 141 2 599 609.e3, 609.e1-609.e3 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.04.052 21683077
96 Clarke G. Grenham S. Scully P. Fitzgerald P. Moloney R.D. Shanahan F. Dinan T.G. Cryan J.F. The microbiome-gut-brain axis during early life regulates the hippocampal serotonergic system in a sex-dependent manner. Mol. Psychiatry 2013 18 6 666 673 10.1038/mp.2012.77 22688187
97 Desbonnet L. Clarke G. Traplin A. O’Sullivan O. Crispie F. Moloney R.D. Cotter P.D. Dinan T.G. Cryan J.F. Gut microbiota depletion from early adolescence in mice: Implications for brain and behaviour. Brain Behav. Immun. 2015 48 165 173 10.1016/j.bbi.2015.04.004 25866195
98 Reid B.M. Horne R. Donzella B. Szamosi J.C. Coe C.L. Foster J.A. Gunnar M.R. Microbiota‐immune alterations in adolescents following early life adversity: A proof of concept study. Dev. Psychobiol. 2021 63 5 851 863 10.1002/dev.22061 33249563
99 Jang H.M. Lee K.E. Lee H.J. Kim D.H. Immobilization stress-induced Escherichia coli causes anxiety by inducing NF-κB activation through gut microbiota disturbance. Sci. Rep. 2018 8 1 13897 10.1038/s41598-018-31764-0 30224732
100 De Palma G. Lynch M.D.J. Lu J. Dang V.T. Deng Y. Jury J. Umeh G. Miranda P.M. Pigrau Pastor M. Sidani S. Pinto-Sanchez M.I. Philip V. McLean P.G. Hagelsieb M.G. Surette M.G. Bergonzelli G.E. Verdu E.F. Britz-McKibbin P. Neufeld J.D. Collins S.M. Bercik P. Transplantation of fecal microbiota from patients with irritable bowel syndrome alters gut function and behavior in recipient mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 2017 9 379 eaaf6397 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf6397 28251905
101 Jin X. Zhang Y. Celniker S.E. Xia Y. Mao J.H. Snijders A.M. Chang H. Gut microbiome partially mediates and coordinates the effects of genetics on anxiety-like behavior in Collaborative Cross mice. Sci. Rep. 2021 11 1 270 10.1038/s41598-020-79538-x 33431988
102 Dandekar M.P. Palepu M.S.K. Satti S. Jaiswal Y. Singh A.A. Dash S.P. Gajula S.N.R. Sonti R. Multi-strain probiotic formulation reverses maternal separation and chronic unpredictable mild stress-generated anxiety- and depression-like phenotypes by modulating gut microbiome-brain activity in rats. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2022 13 13 1948 1965 10.1021/acschemneuro.2c00143 35735411
103 Chen Y. Bai J. Wu D. Yu S. Qiang X. Bai H. Wang H. Peng Z. Association between fecal microbiota and generalized anxiety disorder: Severity and early treatment response. J. Affect. Disord. 2019 259 56 66 10.1016/j.jad.2019.08.014 31437702
104 Jiang H. Zhang X. Yu Z. Zhang Z. Deng M. Zhao J. Ruan B. Altered gut microbiota profile in patients with generalized anxiety disorder. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2018 104 130 136 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.07.007 30029052
105 Mason B.L. Li Q. Minhajuddin A. Czysz A.H. Coughlin L.A. Hussain S.K. Koh A.Y. Trivedi M.H. Reduced anti-inflammatory gut microbiota are associated with depression and anhedonia. J. Affect. Disord. 2020 266 394 401 10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.137 32056905
106 Nikolova V.L. Smith M.R.B. Hall L.J. Cleare A.J. Stone J.M. Young A.H. Perturbations in gut microbiota composition in psychiatric disorders: A review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry 2021 78 12 1343 1354 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.2573 34524405
107 Guo T.L. Chen Y. Xu H.S. McDonough C.M. Huang G. Gut microbiome in neuroendocrine and neuroimmune interactions: The case of genistein. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2020 402 115130 10.1016/j.taap.2020.115130 32673657
108 Cheng Y. Wang Y. Zhang W. Yin J. Dong J. Liu J. Relationship between intestinal flora, inflammation, BDNF gene polymorphism and generalized anxiety disorder: A clinical investigation. Medicine 2022 101 29 e28910
109 Gualtieri P. Marchetti M. Cioccoloni G. De Lorenzo A. Romano L. Cammarano A. Colica C. Condò R. Di Renzo L. Psychobiotics regulate the anxiety symptoms in carriers of allele a of il-1 beta gene: A randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Mediators Inflamm. 2020 2020 1 11 10.1155/2020/2346126 32377159
110 Vitellio P. Chira A. De Angelis M. Dumitrascu D.L. Portincasa P. Probiotics in psychosocial stress and anxiety: A systematic review. J. Gastrointestin. Liver Dis. 2020 29 1 77 83 10.15403/jgld-352 32176751
111 Schmidt K. Cowen P.J. Harmer C.J. Tzortzis G. Errington S. Burnet P.W.J. Prebiotic intake reduces the waking cortisol response and alters emotional bias in healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 2015 232 10 1793 1801 10.1007/s00213-014-3810-0 25449699
112 Messaoudi M. Violle N. Bisson J.F. Desor D. Javelot H. Rougeot C. Beneficial psychological effects of a probiotic formulation (Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 and Bifidobacterium longum R0175) in healthy human volunteers. Gut Microbes 2011 2 4 256 261 10.4161/gmic.2.4.16108 21983070
113 Pirbaglou M. Katz J. de Souza R.J. Stearns J.C. Motamed M. Ritvo P. Probiotic supplementation can positively affect anxiety and depressive symptoms: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Nutr. Res. 2016 36 9 889 898 10.1016/j.nutres.2016.06.009 27632908
114 Slykerman R.F. Hood F. Wickens K. Thompson J.M.D. Barthow C. Murphy R. Kang J. Rowden J. Stone P. Crane J. Stanley T. Abels P. Purdie G. Maude R. Mitchell E.A. Effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 in pregnancy on postpartum symptoms of depression and anxiety: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. EBioMedicine 2017 24 159 165 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.09.013 28943228
115 Yang B. Wei J. Ju P. Chen J. Effects of regulating intestinal microbiota on anxiety symptoms: A systematic review. Gen. Psychiatr. 2019 32 2 e100056 10.1136/gpsych-2019-100056 31179435
116 Eskandarzadeh S. Effatpanah M. Khosravi-Darani K. Askari R. Hosseini A.F. Reisian M. Jazayeri S. Efficacy of a multispecies probiotic as adjunctive therapy in generalized anxiety disorder: A double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Nutr. Neurosci. 2021 24 2 102 108 10.1080/1028415X.2019.1598669 31516094
117 Chinna Meyyappan A. Forth E. Wallace C.J.K. Milev R. Effect of fecal microbiota transplant on symptoms of psychiatric disorders: A systematic review. BMC Psychiatry 2020 20 1 299 10.1186/s12888-020-02654-5 32539741
118 Kessler R.C. Petukhova M. Sampson N.A. Zaslavsky A.M. Wittchen H.U. Twelve-month and lifetime prevalence and lifetime morbid risk of anxiety and mood disorders in the United States. Int. J. Methods Psychiatr. Res. 2012 21 3 169 184 10.1002/mpr.1359 22865617
119 Quagliato L.A. Freire R.C. Nardi A.E. Elevated peripheral kynurenine/tryptophan ratio predicts poor short-term auditory memory in panic disorder patients. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2019 113 159 164 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.03.027 30959226
120 Lapin I.P. Stimulant and convulsive effects of kynurenines injected into brain ventricles in mice. J. Neural Transm. (Vienna) 1978 42 1 37 43 10.1007/BF01262727 641543
121 Mok M.H.S. Fricker A.C. Weil A. Kew J.N.C. Electrophysiological characterisation of the actions of kynurenic acid at ligand-gated ion channels. Neuropharmacology 2009 57 3 242 249 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2009.06.003 19523966
122 Butler M.I. Long-Smith C. Moloney G.M. Morkl S. O’Mahony S.M. Cryan J.F. Clarke G. Dinan T.G. The immune-kynurenine pathway in social anxiety disorder. Brain Behav. Immun. 2022 99 317 326 10.1016/j.bbi.2021.10.020 34758380
123 Quagliato L.A. Nardi A.E. Cytokine alterations in panic disorder: A systematic review. J. Affect. Disord. 2018 228 91 96 10.1016/j.jad.2017.11.094 29241050
124 Fernández-Serrano A.B. Moya-Faz F.J. Giner Alegría C.A. Fernández Rodríguez J.C. Negative correlation between IL‐1β IL‐12 and TNF‐γ and cortisol levels in patients with panic disorder. Brain Behav. 2022 12 6 e2624 10.1002/brb3.2624 35588458
125 Xie Z. Jiang W. Deng M. Wang W. Xie X. Feng X. Shi Y. Zhang X. Song D. Yuan Z. Wang Y. Alterations of oral microbiota in patients with panic disorder. Bioengineered 2021 12 1 9103 9112 10.1080/21655979.2021.1994738 34666612
126 Simpson C.A. Adler C. du Plessis M.R. Landau E.R. Dashper S.G. Reynolds E.C. Schwartz O.S. Simmons J.G. Oral microbiome composition, but not diversity, is associated with adolescent anxiety and depression symptoms. Physiol. Behav. 2020 226 113126 10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113126 32777312
127 Kuc D. Zgrajka W. Parada-Turska J. Urbanik-Sypniewska T. Turski W.A. Micromolar concentration of kynurenic acid in rat small intestine. Amino Acids 2008 35 2 503 505 10.1007/s00726-007-0631-z 18235993
128 Hayaishi O. Taniuchi H. Tashiro M. Kuno S. Studies on the metabolism of kynurenic acid. I. The formation of L-glutamic acid, D- and L-alanine, and acetic acid from kynurenic acid by Pseudomonas extracts. J. Biol. Chem. 1961 236 9 2492 2497 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)64026-8 13712440
129 Kaihara M. Price J.M. The metabolism of quinaldic acid, kynurenic acid, and xanthurenic acid in the rabbit. J. Biol. Chem. 1962 237 5 1727 1729 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)83769-9 14453131
130 Dagley S. Johnson P.A. Microbial oxidation of kynurenic, xanthurenic and picolinic acids. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1963 78 4 577 587 10.1016/0006-3002(63)91023-0 14089438
131 American Psychiatric Association (APA) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed Washington, DC American Psychiatric Association Publishing 2013
132 Liberzon I. Krstov M. Young E.A. Stress-restress: Effects on ACTH and fast feedback. Psychoneuroendocrinology 1997 22 6 443 453 10.1016/S0306-4530(97)00044-9 9364622
133 Zhou Q. Sun T. Wu F. Li F. Liu Y. Li W. Dai N. Tan L. Li T. Song Y. Correlation of gut microbiota and neurotransmitters in a rat model of post-traumatic stress disorder. J. Trad. Chinese Med. Sci 2020
134 Wilson C.B. Ebenezer P.J. McLaughlin L.D. Francis J. Predator exposure/psychosocial stress animal model of post-traumatic stress disorder modulates neurotransmitters in the rat hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. PLoS One 2014 9 2 e89104 10.1371/journal.pone.0089104 24551226
135 Leclercq S. Forsythe P. Bienenstock J. Posttraumatic stress disorder: Does the gut microbiome hold the key? Can. J. Psychiatry 2016 61 4 204 213 10.1177/0706743716635535 27254412
136 Hemmings S.M.J. Malan-Müller S. van den Heuvel L.L. Demmitt B.A. Stanislawski M.A. Smith D.G. Bohr A.D. Stamper C.E. Hyde E.R. Morton J.T. Marotz C.A. Siebler P.H. Braspenning M. Van Criekinge W. Hoisington A.J. Brenner L.A. Postolache T.T. McQueen M.B. Krauter K.S. Knight R. Seedat S. Lowry C.A. The microbiome in posttraumatic stress disorder and trauma-exposed controls: An exploratory study. Psychosom. Med. 2017 79 8 936 946 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000512 28700459
137 Gao F. Guo R. Ma Q. Li Y. Wang W. Fan Y. Ju Y. Zhao B. Gao Y. Qian L. Yang Z. He X. Jin X. Liu Y. Peng Y. Chen C. Chen Y. Gao C. Zhu F. Ma X. Stressful events induce long-term gut microbiota dysbiosis and associated post-traumatic stress symptoms in healthcare workers fighting against COVID-19. J. Affect. Disord. 2022 303 187 195 10.1016/j.jad.2022.02.024 35157946
138 Raskind M.A. Peskind E.R. Chow B. Harris C. Davis-Karim A. Holmes H.A. Hart K.L. McFall M. Mellman T.A. Reist C. Romesser J. Rosenheck R. Shih M.C. Stein M.B. Swift R. Gleason T. Lu Y. Huang G.D. Trial of prazosin for post-traumatic stress disorder in military veterans. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018 378 6 507 517 10.1056/NEJMoa1507598 29414272
139 Amos T. Stein D.J. Ipser J.C. Pharmacological interventions for preventing post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Cochrane Libr. 2014 7 CD006239 10.1002/14651858.CD006239.pub2 25001071
140 Baker J.F. Cates M.E. Luthin D.R. D-cycloserine in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder. Ment. Health Clin. 2017 7 2 88 94 10.9740/mhc.2017.03.088 29955504
141 Brunet A. Poundja J. Tremblay J. Bui É. Thomas É. Orr S.P. Azzoug A. Birmes P. Pitman R.K. Trauma reactivation under the influence of propranolol decreases posttraumatic stress symptoms and disorder: 3 open-label trials. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2011 31 4 547 550 10.1097/JCP.0b013e318222f360 21720237
142 Feder A. Costi S. Rutter S.B. Collins A.B. Govindarajulu U. Jha M.K. Horn S.R. Kautz M. Corniquel M. Collins K.A. Bevilacqua L. Glasgow A.M. Brallier J. Pietrzak R.H. Murrough J.W. Charney D.S. A randomized controlled trial of repeated ketamine administration for chronic posttraumatic stress disorder. Am. J. Psychiatry 2021 178 2 193 202 10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.20050596 33397139
143 Mithoefer M.C. Mithoefer A.T. Feduccia A.A. Jerome L. Wagner M. Wymer J. Holland J. Hamilton S. Yazar-Klosinski B. Emerson A. Doblin R. 3,4-methylenedioxy-methamphetamine (MDMA)-assisted psychotherapy for post-traumatic stress disorder in military veterans, firefighters, and police officers: A randomised, double-blind, dose-response, phase 2 clinical trial. Lancet Psychiatry 2018 5 6 486 497 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30135-4 29728331
144 Mithoefer M.C. Feduccia A.A. Jerome L. Mithoefer A. Wagner M. Walsh Z. Hamilton S. Yazar-Klosinski B. Emerson A. Doblin R. MDMA-assisted psychotherapy for treatment of PTSD: Study design and rationale for phase 3 trials based on pooled analysis of six phase 2 randomized controlled trials. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 2019 236 9 2735 2745 10.1007/s00213-019-05249-5 31065731
145 Mitchell J.M. Bogenschutz M. Lilienstein A. Harrison C. Kleiman S. Parker-Guilbert K. Ot’alora G. M.; Garas, W.; Paleos, C.; Gorman, I.; Nicholas, C.; Mithoefer, M.; Carlin, S.; Poulter, B.; Mithoefer, A.; Quevedo, S.; Wells, G.; Klaire, S.S.; van der Kolk, B.; Tzarfaty, K.; Amiaz, R.; Worthy, R.; Shannon, S.; Woolley, J.D.; Marta, C.; Gelfand, Y.; Hapke, E.; Amar, S.; Wallach, Y.; Brown, R.; Hamilton, S.; Wang, J.B.; Coker, A.; Matthews, R.; de Boer, A.; Yazar-Klosinski, B.; Emerson, A.; Doblin, R. MDMA-assisted therapy for severe PTSD: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study. Nat. Med. 2021 27 6 1025 1033 10.1038/s41591-021-01336-3 33972795
146 Young M.B. Andero R. Ressler K.J. Howell L.L. 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine facilitates fear extinction learning. Transl. Psychiatry 2015 5 9 e634 10.1038/tp.2015.138 26371762
147 Young M.B. Norrholm S.D. Khoury L.M. Jovanovic T. Rauch S.A.M. Reiff C.M. Dunlop B.W. Rothbaum B.O. Howell L.L. Inhibition of serotonin transporters disrupts the enhancement of fear memory extinction by 3,4-methylenedioxy-methamphetamine (MDMA). Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 2017 234 19 2883 2895 10.1007/s00213-017-4684-8 28741031
148 Ridge E.A. Pachhain S. Choudhury S.R. Bodnar S.R. Larsen R.A. Phuntumart V. Sprague J.E. The influence of the host microbiome on 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)-induced hyperthermia and vice versa. Sci. Rep. 2019 9 1 4313 10.1038/s41598-019-40803-3 30867489
149 Mellon S.H. Gautam A. Hammamieh R. Jett M. Wolkowitz O.M. Metabolism, metabolomics, and inflammation in posttraumatic stress disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 2018 83 10 866 875 10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.02.007 29628193
150 Bersani F.S. Mellon S.H. Lindqvist D. Kang J.I. Rampersaud R. Somvanshi P.R. Doyle F.J. III Hammamieh R. Jett M. Yehuda R. Marmar C.R. Wolkowitz O.M. Novel Pharmacological targets for combat PTSD—metabolism, inflammation, the gut microbiome, and mitochondrial dysfunction. Mil. Med. 2020 185 Suppl. 1 311 318 10.1093/milmed/usz260 32074311
151 Wallace C.J.K. Milev R.V. The efficacy, safety, and tolerability of probiotics on depression: Clinical results from an open-label pilot study. Front. Psychiatry 2021 12 12 618279 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.618279 33658952
152 Majeed M. Nagabhushanam K. Arumugam S. Majeed S. Ali F. Bacillus coagulans MTCC 5856 for the management of major depression with irritable bowel syndrome: A randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled, multi-centre, pilot clinical study. Food Nutr. Res. 2018 62 10.29219/fnr.v62.1218 29997457
153 Gualtieri P. Marchetti M. Cioccoloni G. De Lorenzo A. Romano L. Cammarano A. Colica C. Condò R. Di Renzo L. Psychobiotics regulate the anxiety symptoms in carriers of Allele A of IL-1β gene: A randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Mediators Inflamm. 2020 2020 1 11 10.1155/2020/2346126 32377159
154 Brenner L.A. Stearns-Yoder K.A. Stamper C.E. Hoisington A.J. Brostow D.P. Hoffmire C.A. Forster J.E. Donovan M.L. Ryan A.T. Postolache T.T. Lowry C.A. Rationale, design, and methods: A randomized placebo-controlled trial of an immunomodulatory probiotic intervention for Veterans with PTSD. Contemp. Clin. Trials Commun. 2022 28 100960 100960 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.100960 35812820
155 Troyer E.A. Kohn J.N. Ecklu-Mensah G. Aleti G. Rosenberg D.R. Hong S. Searching for host immune-microbiome mechanisms in obsessive-compulsive disorder: A narrative literature review and future directions. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2021 125 517 534 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.02.034 33639178
156 Pérez-Vigil A. Fernández de la Cruz L. Brander G. Isomura K. Gromark C. Mataix-Cols D. The link between autoimmune diseases and obsessive-compulsive and tic disorders: A systematic review. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2016 71 542 562 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.09.025 27687817
157 Lamothe H. Baleyte J.M. Smith P. Pelissolo A. Mallet L. Individualized immunological data for precise classification of OCD patients. Brain Sci. 2018 8 8 149 10.3390/brainsci8080149 30096863
158 Marazziti D. Mucci F. Fontenelle L.F. Immune system and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2018 93 39 44 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.04.013 29689421
159 Gerentes M. Pelissolo A. Rajagopal K. Tamouza R. Hamdani N. Obsessive-compulsive disorder: Autoimmunity and neuroinflammation. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 2019 21 8 78 10.1007/s11920-019-1062-8 31367805
160 Swedo S.E. Frankovich J. Murphy T.K. Overview of treatment of pediatric acute-onset neuropsychiatric syndrome. J. Child Adolesc. Psychopharmacol. 2017 27 7 562 565 10.1089/cap.2017.0042 28722464
161 Hoffman K.L. Cano-Ramírez H. Pediatric neuropsychiatric syndromes associated with infection and microbiome alterations: Clinical findings, possible role of the mucosal epithelium, and strategies for the development of new animal models. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2022 17 7 717 731 10.1080/17460441.2022.2074396 35543072
162 Turna J. Grosman Kaplan K. Anglin R. Patterson B. Soreni N. Bercik P. Surette M.G. Van Ameringen M. The gut microbiome and inflammation in obsessive‐compulsive disorder patients compared to age‐ and sex‐matched controls: A pilot study. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 2020 142 4 337 347 10.1111/acps.13175 32307692
163 Scheepers I.M. Cryan J.F. Bastiaanssen T.F.S. Rea K. Clarke G. Jaspan H.B. Harvey B.H. Hemmings S.M.J. Santana L. Sluis R. Malan-Müller S. Wolmarans D.W. Natural compulsive‐like behaviour in the deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus bairdii) is associated with altered gut microbiota composition. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2020 51 6 1419 1427 10.1111/ejn.14610 31663195
164 Domènech L. Willis J. Alemany-Navarro M. Morell M. Real E. Escaramís G. Bertolín S. Sánchez C.D. Balcells S. Segalàs C. Estivill X. Menchón J.M. Gabaldón T. Alonso P. Rabionet R. Changes in the stool and oropharyngeal microbiome in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Sci. Rep. 2022 12 1 1448 10.1038/s41598-022-05480-9 35087123
165 Quagliariello A. Del Chierico F. Russo A. Reddel S. Conte G. Lopetuso L.R. Ianiro G. Dallapiccola B. Cardona F. Gasbarrini A. Putignani L. Gut microbiota profiling and gut-brain crosstalk in children affected by pediatric acute-onset neuropsychiatric syndrome and pediatric autoimmune neuropsychiatric disorders associated with streptococcal infections. Front. Microbiol. 2018 9 675 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00675 29686658
166 Stojanov S. Berlec A. Štrukelj B. The influence of probiotics on the firmicutes/bacteroidetes ratio in the treatment of obesity and inflammatory bowel disease. Microorganisms 2020 8 11 1715 10.3390/microorganisms8111715 33139627
167 Rees J.C. Obsessive–compulsive disorder and gut microbiota dysregulation. Med. Hypotheses 2014 82 2 163 166 10.1016/j.mehy.2013.11.026 24332563
168 Cox C.J. Zuccolo A.J. Edwards E.V. Mascaro-Blanco A. Alvarez K. Stoner J. Chang K. Cunningham M.W. Antineuronal antibodies in a heterogeneous group of youth and young adults with tics and obsessive-compulsive disorder. J. Child Adolesc. Psychopharmacol. 2015 25 1 76 85 10.1089/cap.2014.0048 25658702
169 Calaprice D. Tona J. Murphy T.K. Treatment of pediatric acute-onset neuropsychiatric disorder in a large survey population. J. Child Adolesc. Psychopharmacol. 2018 28 2 92 103 10.1089/cap.2017.0101 28832181
170 Kantak P.A. Bobrow D.N. Nyby J.G. Obsessive–compulsive-like behaviors in house mice are attenuated by a probiotic (Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG). Behav. Pharmacol. 2014 25 1 71 79 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000013 24257436
171 Sanikhani N.S. Modarressi M.H. Jafari P. Vousooghi N. Shafei S. Akbariqomi M. Heidari R. Lavasani P.S. Yazarlou F. Motevaseli E. Ghafouri-Fard S. The effect of Lactobacillus casei consumption in improvement of obsessive–compulsive disorder: An animal study. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2020 12 4 1409 1419 10.1007/s12602-020-09642-x 32124236
172 Kobliner V. Mumper E. Baker S.M. Reduction in obsessive-compuslisive disorder and self- injurious behavior with Saccharomyces boulardii in a child with autism: A case report. Integr. Med. (Encinitas) 2018 17 6 38 41 31043927
173 Halverson T. Alagiakrishnan K. Gut microbes in neurocognitive and mental health disorders. Ann. Med. 2020 52 8 423 443 10.1080/07853890.2020.1808239 32772900
174 Lukić I.; Getselter, D.; Ziv, O.; Oron, O.; Reuveni, E.; Koren, O.; Elliott, E. Antidepressants affect gut microbiota and Ruminococcus flavefaciens is able to abolish their effects on depressive-like behavior. Transl. Psychiatry 2019 9 1 133 10.1038/s41398-019-0466-x 30967529
175 Morais L.H. Felice D. Golubeva A.V. Moloney G. Dinan T.G. Cryan J.F. Strain differences in the susceptibility to the gut–brain axis and neurobehavioural alterations induced by maternal immune activation in mice. Behav. Pharmacol. 2018 29 2 and 3 181 198 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000374 29462110
176 Zhang X. Lei B. Yuan Y. Zhang L. Hu L. Jin S. Kang B. Liao X. Sun W. Xu F. Zhong Y. Hu J. Qi H. Brain control of humoral immune responses amenable to behavioural modulation. Nature 2020 581 7807 204 208 10.1038/s41586-020-2235-7 32405000
177 Hashimoto K. Molecular mechanisms of the rapid-acting and long-lasting antidepressant actions of (R)-ketamine. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2020 177 113935 10.1016/j.bcp.2020.113935 32224141
178 Wei Y. Wang T. Liao L. Fan X. Chang L. Hashimoto K. Brain-spleen axis in health and diseases: A review and future perspective. Brain Res. Bull. 2022 182 130 140 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2022.02.008 35157987
179 Silva Y.P. Bernardi A. Frozza R.L. The role of short-chain fatty acids from gut microbiota in gut-brain communication. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 2020 11 25 10.3389/fendo.2020.00025 32082260
180 Sanmarco L.M. Wheeler M.A. Gutiérrez-Vázquez C. Polonio C.M. Linnerbauer M. Pinho-Ribeiro F.A. Li Z. Giovannoni F. Batterman K.V. Scalisi G. Zandee S.E.J. Heck E.S. Alsuwailm M. Rosene D.L. Becher B. Chiu I.M. Prat A. Quintana F.J. Gut-licensed IFNγ+ NK cells drive LAMP1+TRAIL+ anti-inflammatory astrocytes. Nature 2021 590 7846 473 479 10.1038/s41586-020-03116-4 33408417
181 Erny D. Prinz M. How microbiota shape microglial phenotypes and epigenetics. Glia 2020 68 8 1655 1672 10.1002/glia.23822 32181523
182 Mohr A.E. Jäger R. Carpenter K.C. Kerksick C.M. Purpura M. Townsend J.R. West N.P. Black K. Gleeson M. Pyne D.B. Wells S.D. Arent S.M. Kreider R.B. Campbell B.I. Bannock L. Scheiman J. Wissent C.J. Pane M. Kalman D.S. Pugh J.N. Ortega-Santos C.P. ter Haar J.A. Arciero P.J. Antonio J. The athletic gut microbiota. J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr. 2020 17 1 24 10.1186/s12970-020-00353-w 32398103
183 Moloney G.M. Cryan J.F. Clarke G. “Digging in the Dirt” faecal microRNAs as dietary biomarkers of host-microbe interactions. Hepatobiliary Surg. Nutr. 2022 11 2 292 294 10.21037/hbsn-21-551 35464286
184 Palacios-García I. Mhuireach G.A. Grasso-Cladera A. Cryan J.F. Parada F.J. The 4E approach to the human microbiome: Nested interactions between the gut‐brain/body system within natural and built environments. BioEssays 2022 44 6 2100249 10.1002/bies.202100249 35338496
185 Bear T.L.K. Dalziel J.E. Coad J. Roy N.C. Butts C.A. Gopal P.K. The role of the gut microbiota in dietary interventions for depression and anxiety. Adv. Nutr. 2020 11 4 890 907 10.1093/advances/nmaa016 32149335
186 Dong Z. Shen X. Hao Y. Li J. Li H. Xu H. Yin L. Kuang W. Gut microbiome: A potential indicator for differential diagnosis of major depressive disorder and general anxiety disorder. Front. Psychiatry 2021 12 651536 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.651536 34589003
187 Davis M.T. Holmes S.E. Pietrzak R.H. Esterlis I. Neurobiology of chronic stress-related psychiatric disorders: Evidence from molecular imaging studies. Chronic Stress (Thousand Oaks) 2017 1 1 21 10.1177/2470547017710916 29862379
188 Dhar D. Impending mental health issues during coronavirus disease 2019 – time for personalized nutrition based on the gut microbiota to tide over the crisis? Front. Neurosci. 2022 15 831193 10.3389/fnins.2021.831193 35110993
189 Yeoh Y.K. Zuo T. Lui G.C.Y. Zhang F. Liu Q. Li A.Y.L. Chung A.C.K. Cheung C.P. Tso E.Y.K. Fung K.S.C. Chan V. Ling L. Joynt G. Hui D.S.C. Chow K.M. Ng S.S.S. Li T.C.M. Ng R.W.Y. Yip T.C.F. Wong G.L.H. Chan F.K.L. Wong C.K. Chan P.K.S. Ng S.C. Gut microbiota composition reflects disease severity and dysfunctional immune responses in patients with COVID-19. Gut 2021 70 4 698 706 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323020 33431578
190 Chinna Meyyappan A. Forth E. Milev R. Microbial ecosystem therapeutic-2 intervention in people with major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder. Phase 1, open-label study. Interact. J. Med. Res. 2022 11 1 e32234 10.2196/32234 35060914
191 Gupta S. Mullish B.H. Allegretti J.R. Fecal microbiota transplantation: The evolving landscape. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2021 116 4 647 656 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001075 33982930
192 Settanni C.R. Ianiro G. Bibbò S. Cammarota G. Gasbarrini A. Gut microbiota alteration and modulation in psychiatric disorders: Current evidence on fecal microbiota transplantation. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2021 109 110258 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2021.110258 33497754
193 Insel T. Cuthbert B. Garvey M. Heinssen R. Pine D.S. Quinn K. Sanislow C. Wang P. Steinberg J. Wang P. Research domain criteria (RDoC): Toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. Am. J. Psychiatry 2010 167 7 748 751 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09091379 20595427
194 Cuthbert B.N. Insel T.R. Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: The seven pillars of RDoC. BMC Med. 2013 11 1 126 10.1186/1741-7015-11-126 23672542
195 Clark L.A. Cuthbert B. Lewis-Fernández R. Narrow W.E. Reed G.M. Three approaches to understanding and classifying mental disorder: ICD-11, DSM-5, and the National Institute of Mental Health’s research domain criteria (RDoC). Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 2017 18 2 72 145 10.1177/1529100617727266 29211974
196 Maes M. Anderson G. False dogmas in schizophrenia research; Toward the reification of pathway phenotypes and pathway classes. Front. Psychiatry 2021 12 663985 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.663985 34220578
197 Stoyanov D. Maes M.H.J. How to construct neuroscience-informed psychiatric classification? Towards nomothetic networks psychiatry. World J. Psychiatry 2021 11 1 1 12 10.5498/wjp.v11.i1.1 33511042
198 Moloney G.M. Clarke G. Cryan J.F. Gut-brain-axis and the microbiome. Microb. Health Dis. 2021 4 3 e769
199 Marx W. Lane M. Hockey M. Aslam H. Berk M. Walder K. Borsini A. Firth J. Pariante C.M. Berding K. Cryan J.F. Clarke G. Craig J.M. Su K.P. Mischoulon D. Gomez-Pinilla F. Foster J.A. Cani P.D. Thuret S. Staudacher H.M. Sánchez-Villegas A. Arshad H. Akbaraly T. O’Neil A. Segasby T. Jacka F.N. Diet and depression: Exploring the biological mechanisms of action. Mol. Psychiatry 2021 26 1 134 150 10.1038/s41380-020-00925-x 33144709
200 Ribeiro G. Ferri A. Clarke G. Cryan J.F. Diet and the microbiota-gut-brain-axis: A primer for clinical nutrition. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2022 25 6 443 450 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000874 36102353
201 Schellekens H. Ribeiro G. Cuesta-Marti C. Cryan J.F. The microbiome-gut-brain axis in nutritional neuroscience. Nutr. Neurosci. 2022 1 13 10.1080/1028415X.2022.2128007 36222323
202 de Melo L.G.P. Nunes S.O.V. Anderson G. Vargas H.O. Barbosa D.S. Galecki P. Carvalho A.F. Maes M. Shared metabolic and immune-inflammatory, oxidative and nitrosative stress pathways in the metabolic syndrome and mood disorders. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2017 78 34 50 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.04.027 28438472
