
==== Front
Leukemia
Leukemia
Leukemia
0887-6924
1476-5551
Nature Publishing Group UK London

38396286
2181
10.1038/s41375-024-02181-2
Review Article
The evolution of preclinical models for myelodysplastic neoplasms
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4388-4825
Mina Alain alain.mina@nih.gov

1
Pavletic Steven 1
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5686-9969
Aplan Peter D. 12
1 grid.94365.3d 0000 0001 2297 5165 Myeloid Malignancies Program, Immune Deficiency Cellular Therapy Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD USA
2 grid.94365.3d 0000 0001 2297 5165 Genetics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD USA
23 2 2024
23 2 2024
2024
38 4 683691
20 9 2023
6 2 2024
8 2 2024
© This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Myelodysplastic Neoplasms (MDS) are a group of clonal disorders characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis and morphologic dysplasia. Clinical manifestations of MDS vary widely and are dictated in large part by a range of genetic aberrations. The lack of robust in vitro models for MDS has limited the ability to conduct high throughput drug screens, which in turn has hampered the development of novel therapies for MDS. There are very few well-characterized MDS cell lines, and the available cell lines expand poorly in vitro. Conventional xenograft mouse models can provide an in vivo vessel to provide growth of cancer cells, but human MDS cells engraft poorly. Three-dimensional (3D) scaffold models that form human “ossicles” represent a promising new approach and can reproduce the intricate communication between hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and their environment. Genetically engineered mice utilize specific mutations and may not represent the entire array of human MDS; however, genetically engineered mice provided in vivo proof of principle for novel agents such as luspatercept, demonstrating the clinical utility of this approach. This review offers an overview of available preclinical MDS models and potential approaches to accelerate accurate clinical translation.

Subject terms

Myelodysplastic syndrome
Cancer models
issue-copyright-statement© Springer Nature Limited 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS), also referred to as myelodysplastic syndromes and abbreviated MDS, are a group of malignant disorders of hematopoietic differentiation that are characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis and morphologic dysplasia, leading to abnormal peripheral blood counts, infectious complications, and increased risk of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) [1–3]. MDS represents a complex disease entity whose pathogenesis stems from an interplay between microenvironment, genetic and epigenetic elements. Compared to AML, advances in MDS therapies are lagging, in large part due to the paucity of successful preclinical models capable of reproducing the complex genetic landscape of this disease. MDS hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) do not show long term proliferation in vitro [4] and available MDS cell lines are scarce [4]. In addition, xenotransplantation of human MDS cells in immunocompromised murine hosts has been limited by poor engraftment and maintenance of MDS in the host [5] not to mention the inability to reproduce a human bone marrow microenvironment (BME). Other efforts that generated genetically engineered mice (GEM) based on recurrent mutations identified in MDS patients failed to fully replicate all features of human MDS with numerous clinical, morphologic, and genetic aspects of the disease often lacking [6, 7] This made developing therapeutic strategies targeting recurrent genetic abnormalities very challenging. More recent efforts attempted to create “humanized” 3D structures that can mimic the human BME [8, 9]. These models can be quite sophisticated but are far from perfect tools as they require high level resources and expertise. In this synopsis, we will review the evolution of preclinical models from the simple single cell in-vitro systems to the complex in-vivo 3D models.

In vitro MDS cell lines

Numerous investigators have attempted to generate MDS cell lines, however, these efforts have been largely unsuccessful. An ideal MDS cell line would generate consistent and reproducible results, be easily transferable, and interactive with any artificial matrix that models the BME. Drexler et al. reviewed 31 putative MDS cell lines and used genomic DNA profiling and cytogenetic analysis, to assign each cell line into one of three categories: (1) false/non -malignant cell lines, (2) malignant cell lines in the leukemic phase and (3) valid MDS cell lines (3 of 31) [4]. Cell lines considered a valid representation of the MDS phenotype were M-TAT, TER-3, MDS92, and their derivatives (Table 1).Table 1 Candidate MDS cell lines.

In-vitro MDS Cell Lines	Year	Source	Characteristics	References	
MDS92	1991	Bone marrow of 52-year-old with MDS-RARS	-Responsive to cytokines: GM-CSF, IL3	Tohyoma et al. [11]	
-Able to be maintained for prolonged periods in-vivo	
-Complex cytogenetics (5q-, monosomy7, point mutation in N-RAS)	
M-TAT	1994	Peripheral blood of 3-year old patient with RAEB-MDS	-Responsive to cytokines: EPO, GM-CSF, SCF, IL3	Minegishi et al. [10]	
-Can differentiate into erythroid or megakaryocytic lineages	
MDS-L	2000	MDS92	-Responsive to cytokines (mainly IL3)	Matsuoka et al. [13]	
-Complex cytogenetics (includes 5q-)	
-Contributed to study of lenalidomide	
Standard cell line for MDS therapeutic development	
TER-3	2002	Patient with RAEB	-Responsive to cytokines: G-CSF, GM-CSF, IL3, TPO, M-CSF, SCF	Mishima et al. [16]	
-Myeloid and lymphoid surface makers	
-Complex cytogenetics (monosomy 7, monosomy 20)	
-Can differentiate into erythroid and megakaryocytic lineages	
MDS-L-2007	2018	MDS92	-Only responds to high dose (100 ng/mL) IL3	Kida et al. [12]	
-H3-K27M mutated	
-IL-3 dependency depends on H3-K27M status	
MDS-LGF	2018	MDS92	-Responds to low dose (1 ng/mL) IL3	Kida et al. [12]	
-Successfully transplanted in nsgs xenograft models	
-Provided an early in-vivo mouse model	
-H3-K27M wild-type	
-IL-3 dependency depends on H3-K27M status	

The M-TAT cell line was isolated from the peripheral blood of a 3-year-old patient with refractory anemia with excess blasts MDS (RAEB-MDS). These cells were responsive to various cytokines (such as erythropoietin (EPO) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)) for growth and maturation of their megakaryocytic and erythroid lineages [10].

The MDS92 cell line was derived from the bone marrow of a 52-year-old patient with refractory anemia and ringed sideroblasts (MDS-RARS) [11]. These cells were not in the leukemic stage and were able to be maintained in vivo for prolonged periods of time while retaining the ability to grow and mature with characteristics that are consistent with MDS. In addition, MDS92 cells proliferated in response to interleukin-3 (IL3) and were characterized by the deletion of 5q chromosome [del(5q)], monosomy 7 and a point mutation in codon 12 of the N-RAS oncogene [11, 12]. A blastic line, MDS-L, was later derived from MDS92 and was instrumental for the study of MDS with del(5q) as well as delineation of the therapeutic effects of lenalidomide on del(5q) MDS [13–15]. Additional blastic sublines were independently isolated from MDS92 and include the MDS-L-2007 and MDS-LGF. Kida et al. described these two major subclones of MDS-L and demonstrated that MDS-L-2007 proliferated in response to high dose (100 ng/mL) IL-3 while the MDS-LGF proliferated in response to much lower doses (1ng/mL). Authors also provided data on the relationship between histone H3 K27M mutation and IL-3 dependence. This data provided crucial evidence that the survival of MDS clones depends on an interplay between environmental factors and intrinsic genetic and epigenetic properties [12].

In 2002, Mishima et al. described TER-3, a new hematopoietic cell line derived from a patient that had recently progressed from refractory anemia (RA) to RAEB [16]. The TER-3 cell line had a complex karyotype and, similar to MDS92, displayed monosomy 7 and no chromosome 5 rearrangements. Cells were found to be constitutively dependent on cytokine signaling for growth and had the potential to differentiate into erythroid and megakaryocytic lineages [16]. Ultimately, Drexler and colleagues concluded that, given its availability and cytogenetic profile that includes a 5q deletion, the MDS92 cell line seemed to be the most promising in vitro MDS model [4].

Given the limited proliferative potential of MDS cell lines as well as the scarcity of dependable in vitro models, the study of genetically engineered murine models and xenografted mice emerged as alternate approaches. These in vivo models may provide a more realistic representation of human MDS as they allow the interaction between mammalian cells and their microenvironment.

Xenograft models

Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) represent an additional option to reproduce disease complexity in vivo and test therapeutic interventions. To generate a successful PDX model, an immunodeficient recipient is required to avoid immune rejection of the human cells. A landmark study demonstrated that a small subset of AML cells could be transplanted to Scid (severe combined immune deficient) mice; this study introduced the concept of cancer stem cells [17]. Combination of a non-obese diabetic (NOD) and severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) strains resulted in mice that had defective T, B, and NK function [16, 17]. These models were further enhanced by removal of the common gamma chain of the interleukin 2 receptor (IL2rδnull) resulting in NOD SCID Gamma (NSG) mice that were more permissive recipients and allowed for significantly higher rates of AML engraftment [18–20].

Despite improved engraftment of AML cells in NSG mice, engraftment of MDS cells remained poor, therefore, additional alterations were made to improve the BME and support trilineage maturation of human progenitor cells [21, 22]. Introducing human cytokine genes into the NSG mouse genome led to the constitutive expression of stem cell factor (SCF), IL3 and granulocyte monocyte colony-stimulating-factor (GM-CSF) resulting in engraftment and expansion of myeloid cells (NSGS mice) [23, 24]. However, most MDS subtypes (except chronic myelomonocytic leukemia) did not engraft [25, 26]. A similar approach was used to generate MISTRG mice, in which human alleles of, macrophage-CSF (M-CSF), IL3, GM-CSF, signal regulatory protein alpha (SIRPα) and thrombopoietin (TPO) replaced their murine counterparts via homologous recombination; these alleles were then crossed onto an immunodeficient background (Rag−/−IL2rg−/−). This resulted in robust but transient engraftment of CD33+ myeloid cells and some cases of MDS [27–30]. The MISTRG model is promising in that engraftment was not limited to any specific MDS subtype, and MISTRG MDS PDX mice reliably reproduced patients’ dysplastic features and captured their mutational profiles and genetic complexities.

Potential pre-clinical utility of PDX models has been demonstrated by several investigators. In one study, MISTRG mice were engrafted with human MDS cells expressing an IDH2 R140Q mutant protein and treated with an oral IDH2 inhibitor. This resulted in differentiation of IDH2 mutant blasts and myeloid differentiation of the engrafted MDS cells [30]. Although there was no report of survival benefit or improved peripheral blood counts in the treated mice, these observations demonstrate the potential for this model in evaluating innovative and targeted therapies, alone or in combination. An additional study focused on treating mice engrafted with high risk MDS cells using omacetaxine mepesuccinate, a protein synthesis inhibitor [31]. These investigators showed a decrease in engraftment following omacetaxine treatment, which could be potentiated by adding 5-azacytidine or venetoclax. As an alternate to small molecules, antibodies to CD117 [the receptor for SCF] was shown to deplete human MDS stem cells using an in vivo xenograft model [32].

“Humanizing” the BM microenvironment

Generation of a reliable and readily transplantable MDS PDX remains a challenge due to inadequate engraftment and poor maintenance of donor MDS progenitor cells in the murine host. Some studies suggest a role for the BME in supporting MDS stem cell proliferation and differentiation [33]. This permissive “milieu” relies on the presence of human cytokines and mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), both of which have been shown to help engraft MDS cells under specific conditions [33–36]; a summary of humanized approaches is displayed in Fig. 1. Several research groups have attempted to co-engraft MSCs and MDS cells to promote stem cell myeloid differentiation and persistence. In one study, CD34+ bone marrow cells were intrafemorally injected alongside human stromal cells into NOG (NOD/Shi-scid/IL-2Rγnull) mice and the percentage of human CD45+ engraftment was as high as 89% with suppression of murine host hematopoiesis [35]. Similarly, Medyouf et al. demonstrated that the co-injection of patient-derived MDS CD34+ cells with MSCs led to efficient engraftments (70%) in NSG mice with the resulting xenograft model displaying dysplasia and characteristic molecular lesions [36]. This approach has been used as a pre-clinical platform to assess the efficacy of eltrombopag in producing platelet support for MDS in vivo [37], as well as to assess the ability of PXS-5505 (a pan-lysyl oxidase inhibitor) and 5-azacytidine to augment erythroid differentiation in vivo [38].Fig. 1 Evolution of preclinical models for MDS timeline.

Created with BioRender.com.

A common denominator of these models was sub-optimal, but improved, engraftment, leading to the concept that a BME that more closely mimicked human bone marrow might improve engraftment of primary MDS cells [39, 40]. The reasons behind sub-optimal engraftment are many and likely related to species-specific environmental requirements that promote stem cell survival, homing, and engraftment [23].

HSCs reside and flourish in the bone marrow and interact with an intricate network of cells that include MSCs, Schwann cells, vascular endothelial cells, and osteoblasts, all of which are necessary for proper function of HSCs [33, 41]. These “niches” are thought to support both hematopoietic and leukemic stem cells. Transfer of a scaffold structure that combines human hematopoietic BM cells with nonhematopoietic cells (referred to as an “ossicle”) into an immunodeficient mouse, can generate a “humanized” BM niche [8, 9, 42]. Reinisch et al. developed a humanized BMME by subcutaneous injection of extracellular matrix material with immature MSCs leading to ossicle formation in vivo. Following daily injection of human parathyroid hormone, these ossicles were able to support engraftment of human CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC). Compared to unmanipulated NSG mice, these “humanized” ossicles led to more robust engraftment of HSPCs as well as AML, acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), and myelofibrosis samples [8].

Altrock et al. evaluated the feasibility of this approach [8, 9] in MDS and used a standardized approach to compare the 3D ossicle-based method to intrafemoral (IF) co-injection of MSCs and CD34+ HSPCs [41]. A combination of immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry and molecular analysis demonstrated that 3D humanized ossicle xenotransplantation had a significantly better engraftment rate of MDS samples compared to the historical IF injection of MSCs [36, 43]. A potential drawback of the 3D model was the poor recovery rates of MDS cells from the humanized matrices, which would impede downstream functional and molecular analyses. They suggested immortalizing matrix components and adding endothelial cells to help alleviate that concern [40, 41].

Additional studies have used the concept of 3D scaffold generation to produce ceramic matrices coated with MDS MSCs which were subsequently implanted into immunodeficient mice. The resulting human niche was associated with engraftment of AML samples across all major molecular and risk subgroups [44]. Abarrategi et al. used a gelatin-based scaffold to test distinct implantable niches (osteoblastic, endothelial and MSCs). The authors found that use of this scaffold was associated with improved engraftment of human AML samples compared with other approaches; it is important to note that these studies used human AML and not MDS samples [45]. Another study used a gelatin-based scaffold to create an in vivo vascularized disease model that allowed engraftment of 94% of MDS HSC patient samples irrespective of MDS subtype [46]. Of note, disease-associated “aging” was also demonstrated in this model with a trend toward myeloid differentiation, particularly, in high-risk samples [46].

In addition to vascularizing the niche, co-culturing of HSPCs with MSCs, and adding a 3D structural matrix, other elements of the human BM have been used to help mimic the dynamic interaction between hematopoietic cells and microenvironment. Khan et al. developed vascularized “living” organoids that incorporated human pluripotent stem cells that could generate myeloid and mesenchymal elements as well as vascular sinusoidal structures that can mimic the 3D architecture of the bone marrow [47]. Multimodal imaging and single cell RNA sequencing were used to demonstrate similarity between these organoids and human BMME. These organoids were also shown to support engraftment and proliferation of healthy and malignant human cells [47]. Proof of disease reproducibility was provided when organoid “remodeling and fibrosis” occurred after engraftment of myelofibrosis patients’ cells though application of fibrosis inhibitors such as TGFβ and BET inhibitors and ruxolitinib did not reverse hallmarks of fibrosis. Although MDS was not evaluated with this model, other diseases included were AML, acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) and multiple myeloma [47]. Despite an impressive homology between this organoid’s vascular system and the human BM endothelial system, this model failed to reproduce adipocytes, lymphocytes and smooth muscle cells, limitations that likely could be enhanced by optimizing the growth factors, chemokines, and cytokines in this “hematopoietic milieu”.

Genetically engineered mice

In 1999, The Mouse Models of Human Cancers Consortium (MMHCC) emerged as an effort by the National Cancer Institute to develop mouse models of cancer that were corroborated by the scientific committee and used to better understand different pathways and processes involved in cancer development [48]. In 2002, the hematopathology subcommittee of the MMHCC, developed a consensus recommendation for the classification of hematopoietic neoplasms, including MDS, in murine models. Using clinical course, blood counts, histopathology and immunophenotypic features, they identified myeloid dysplasia which was defined by the presence of cytopenias in the peripheral blood of mice as well as dysplasia in at least 1 of the 3 myeloid lineages [48, 49]. Unlike human MDS, where the presence of dysplasia in 10% of a particular lineage, continues to hold as a diagnostic threshold, the minimal required dysplasia in mice is yet to be defined or validated. Nonetheless, this classification has provided scientists, pathologists, and investigators, with a standardized tool to diagnose MDS in GEM allowing these models to be reliably used to test novel diagnostic and treatment approaches to cancer management.

There are several approaches that have been used to generate MDS in mice; these approaches are distinct from xenografts, which engraft human MDS cells into mouse hosts. The first includes treating mice with known mutagens, such as benzene [50, 51], alkylating agents [52, 53] or viruses [54]. These strategies resulted in a wide spectrum of complex genetic phenotypes including MDS. However, despite providing insight into certain phenotypic aspects of MDS, these mutagenic approaches were largely unable to reliably define contributions of particular genes. In addition, since these approaches depended largely on random mutagenic events, they were not readily reproducible.

Two additional approaches are based on using mutations identified in patients with MDS to generate genetically engineered HSPC. Both approaches have been successful in replicating some, but not all, features of MDS, with certain clinical, morphological, or genetic aspects of the murine model disease lacking when compared to human MDS. In the first approach, murine HSPC are modified to express a mutant gene in vitro, typically using retroviral or lentiviral vectors. The modified HSPC are then transplanted into syngeneic hosts that have been lethally irradiated. Given the requirement for transplantation, this approach is primarily limited to the study of hematologic malignancy, and not easily adapted to the study of solid tumors, such as lung cancer.

A second general approach includes the creation of GEM models that have modified the germline mouse DNA. Transgenic, “knock-out” or “knock-in” mice, can be produced by a variety of techniques, including pronuclear injection of produced by injecting DNA into a fertilized egg or by homologous recombination of embryonic cells followed by blastocyst injection [55]. The general technique for generating GEM models has been refined and modified over the past forty years to allow use of endogenous promoters, as well as tissue specific and temporal expression of mutant genes; advantages and disadvantages for several of these modifications are listed in Table 2. These manipulations lead to modification of germline DNA, which can then be transmitted from generation to generation. A large cohort of mice with an identical genetic modification can then be observed to determine the incidence of MDS in the modified mice.Table 2 Pros and cons of genetically engineered mice (GEM).

Technique	Pros	Cons	
Transgenic using ubiquitous promoter	Initial technique used to generate GEM	-Random integration effect	
-Ubiquitous, non-physiologic expression	
Transgenic using tissue specific promoter	Tissue specific expression	-Random integration effects	
-Expression may be non-physiologic	
Homologous recombination “knock-out”	Useful for gene inactivation	-Vector, targeting can be challenging, unpredictable.	
-Gene inactivated in all tissues.	
-CRISPR improvement.	
Homologous recombination “knock-in”	Express mutant cDNA, fusion gene	-Same as knock-out.	
Physiologic expression from endogenous promoter.	-Expression of mutant in non-relevant tissue (e.g. ldh2 KI)	
Conditional knock-out/knock-in plus	Target knockout to specific tissue	-More complex breeding.	
Tissue specific Cre (trigger for event)	-Tissue specific expression may be "leaky"	
Conditional knock-out/knock-in plus	Trigger Cre expression post-natal	-More complex breeding	
time specific Cre (eg, Mx1, CreERT2)	-Time specific expression may be leaky	

Although there are several advantages of using GEM models, such as knowledge of specific genes modified, transferability of GEM between laboratories, reproducibility, and ability to generate large numbers of genetically identical mice, there are several disadvantages as well. The mouse hematopoietic system, while similar to human, is not identical [56]. These mice are generally kept in specific pathogen free environments, which may not adequately mimic the diverse microbiome seen in humans. In addition, many investigators prefer to use inbred mice, which simplifies genetic analysis and facilitates HSC transplant experiments. This strategy may not adequately recapitulate human genetic diversity. Finally, single engineered mutations may be insufficient to adequately mimic the heterogeneity seen in human MDS, which may require combinations of mutant genes to produce a phenotype. In fact, several highly penetrant GEM models of leukemia are linked to spontaneous acquisition of somatic mutations, which collaborate with the mutation engineered in the mouse germline [57, 58].

TET2

Somatic mutations in the ten-eleven translocation 2 (TET2) gene, leading to loss of function, are found in up to 20% of MDS patients [59]. TET2 was shown to play a role in hematopoietic development, myeloid differentiation [60] and when mutated, malignant transformation [61–63]. Transplantation of Tet2−/− cells into lethally irradiated mice resulted in a CMML-like disease characterized by myeloid dysplasia in bone marrow as well as splenomegaly, neutrophilia, monocytosis and extramedullary hematopoiesis. Tet2 monoallelic loss had a similar but less pronounced phenotype [62].

EZH2

EZH2 is a histone methyltransferase located on chromosome 7 and found to be inactivated in clonal myeloid disorders such as MDS and MPN [64, 65]. Ezh2 knockout mice (Ezh2−/−) developed myelodysplastic disorders characterized by anemia, splenomegaly, and dysplasia of the bone marrow, and the concurrent loss of both Tet2 and Ezh2 resulted in either an MDS phenotype (pancytopenia, myelodysplasia) or MDS/MPN phenotype (monocytosis, splenomegaly) [63]. Interestingly, although latency of disease progression was markedly shortened when both genes were deleted, this genetic combination showed little to no leukemogenic potential. Consistent with observations that EZH2 mutated MDS have a very low risk of AML progression [66, 67], no Ezh2−/− or Tet2−/−Ezh2−/− mice developed AML in their experiments [63].

U2AF1

Mutations in spliceosome genes are found in more than 80% of MDS patients [68]. Spliceosome gene aberrations are thought to often be an MDS initiating event that arises early in the disease process and disrupts healthy hematopoiesis [69, 70]. Mouse models that express mutant genes based on point mutations that have been identified in patients with MDS have been developed for some of these mutations including SF3B1, SRSF2 and U2AF1 [71–74]. Transgenic mice expressing a U2af1 S34F mutation were reported by Shirai et al. [72]. Cells containing a doxycycline-inducible human mutated (mut) U2AF1 or control U2AF1 cDNA were transplanted to lethally irradiated recipients. Following engraftment, both mut U2AF1 and control U2AF1 recipients received doxycycline [75]. Mice with mutated U2AF1 treated with doxycycline developed an isolated peripheral leukopenia (normal platelet counts and red blood cells) while their marrows had increased neutrophil count, apoptotic activity and reduced monocytes and B cells. Prolonged follow up after transplantation (500 days) did not reveal any dysplasia, MDS, or AML development [75]. More recently, U2af1 knock-in models with Cre-dependent knock-in alleles of U2af1S34F were generated and led to dysplasia, macrocytic anemia and leukopenia, but did not demonstrate decreased survival or increased leukemogenesis [76]. This model helped identify cooperating mutations via a study in which a combination of U2af1S34F and Runx1 deficiency led to abnormal hematopoiesis, but not MDS or AML. However, after mutagenesis with ethyl-nitrosourea, a minority of mice developed AML accompanied by mutations in Ikzf1, Idh1 and Gata2 [76].

SF3B1

SF3B1 mutations characterize a subset of MDS with RA, ring sideroblasts, and favorable outcome [72]. Several animal models have attempted to reproduce certain aspects of SF3B1 mutated MDS with varying degrees of success. Obeng et al. created an Sf3b1K700E model in which mice that expressed a SF3B1K700E “knock-in” allele developed erythroid dysplasia and macrocytic anemia but not clear MDS [77]. Independently, and using a “minigene” approach, Mupo et al. developed an Sf3b1K700E model that seemed to have an adequate heterozygous allele expression (50% by RNA-seq analysis) but failed to phenotypically produce disease: There was no difference in overall survival between Sf3b1K700E mice and wild-type, and no mouse developed MDS. Despite progressive normocytic anemia, platelet counts and white blood cell counts remained normal and morphological assessment of the bone marrow revealed no dysplasia or ring sideroblasts [78].

SRSF2

Mutations in SRSF2 are found in up to 15% of MDS patients and often associated with poorer outcomes and a shorter duration to leukemic transformation [71, 79]. Kon et al. developed a knock-in model in which Srsf2P95H/+ mice developed macrocytic anemia by week 15, along with leukopenia and a marked reduction in progenitor cell population. Dysplastic changes in erythroid and megakaryocytic lineages in the bone marrow were detected, although none of the mice developed MDS or AML by week 90 [80]. Another knock-in model, Srsf2P95H/+ mice, was developed by Smeets et al. who confirmed heterozygous expression and transcription by RNA-seq. Srsf2P95H/+ mice developed findings consistent with MDS by 12 months of age, with evidence of morphologic dysplasia in myeloid and erythroid lineages in bone marrow and peripheral blood, without progression into AML. Gene expression analysis found genetic signatures consistent with myeloid differentiation, loss of lymphoid maturation potential and MDS progression [81]. Unlike previous reports, in which Srsf2P95H/+ cells displayed poor engraftment, Smeets et al. were able to overcome this limitation by modifying the bone marrow competitor [81].

DICER

There is evidence that MDS pathogenesis can be driven, at least in part, by an interplay between somatic mutations and the BME [82]. This interaction is necessary for disease progression and maintenance of the malignant clone. Mimicking some of the dysfunction observed in the BME of MDS patients has been used to reproduce disease and create models to better understand it. Dicer1 is an RNase III endonuclease that acts to process pre-miRNA and synthesize microRNA necessary to regulate diverse cellular functions including hematopoiesis [83, 84]. Dicer1 deletion led to global downregulation of microRNAs and drove tumorigenesis in a mouse model of lung cancer mediated by expression of a mutant form of Kras [85]. In a similar effort, Raaijmakers et al. generated mice that deleted Dicer1 in a subset of mesenchymal osteolineage bone marrow cells (designated Oxs-GFP-Cre+Dicerfl/fl or OCDfl/fl) [86]. OCDfl/fl mice showed stunted growth with only 70% survival by week 8. Analysis at 4–6 weeks revealed impaired osteoblastic differentiation and decreased bone marrow mineral matrix deposition. Of interest, OCDfl/fl mice demonstrated ineffective hematopoiesis characterized by decreased peripheral blood counts (marked leukopenia and variable anemia and thrombocytopenia) despite having normal to increased bone marrow cellularity. Morphological examination of their bone marrows revealed dysplastic features, which, along with peripheral cytopenias, were consistent with a diagnosis of MDS per the Bethesda criteria [48, 86]. Other findings that are characteristic of human MDS included increased growth and apoptosis of primitive hematopoietic progenitor cells, decreased B-cell progenitor cells, marked vascularity of the bone marrow and a preferential maturation toward myeloid lineages. In addition, the authors demonstrated the role of BME in MDS pathogenesis by transplanting OCDfl/fl HSCs from mice with clinical MDS onto healthy wild-type recipients. Despite complete donor chimerism, indicating robust engrafted of the mutant OCDfl/fl cells, transplant recipients had normal peripheral blood counts and no dysplastic features. Alternatively, when HSCs from healthy wild-type mice were transplanted onto lethally irradiated OCDfl/fl mice, the wild-type cells developed features of MDS. This series of experiments demonstrated that the OCDfl/fl mouse model was successful at reproducing clinical MDS and delineating the interplay between disease pathogenesis and BME [86].

NUP98 translocations and MDS

The NUP98 gene is present on chromosome 11p15.5 and encodes a component of the nuclear pore complex, which can also function as a transcription scaffold [87]. Fusion proteins resulting from chromosomal translocations involving the NUP98 gene have been identified in lymphoid and myeloid malignancies and act as oncoproteins that can drive malignant transformation [88, 89]. NUP98 fused to several clustered homeobox (HOX) genes, including HOXA9, HOXA13, and HOXD13 have been identified in patients with MDS and AML [90]. Pineault et al. generated a NUP98-HOXD13 murine model in which mouse bone marrow stem cells that expressed a NUP98-HOXD13 fusion gene were generated via retroviral transduction. Colony forming unit spleen assay analysis of transduced bone marrow cells showed that myeloid cells (Gr+/Mac1+) were increased while erythroid precursors were reduced at day 12. In that study, some NUP98-HOXD13 mice developed myeloproliferative disease at the 4-week post-transplant mark but none progressed to AML (except those engineered to concurrently express the TALE homeobox gene Meis1, a strong mediator of NUP98-associated leukemia [91] during a 6-month study period [92].

Lin et al. developed NUP98-HOXD13 (NHD13) transgenic mice that utilized the HS21/45-Vav vector [93] to direct the expression of a human NHD13 fusion cDNA in hematopoietic tissues of mice. Like human MDS, NHD13 mice developed dysplasia and peripheral blood cytopenias in the setting of a hypercellular marrow, demonstrating ineffective hematopoiesis. In addition, this model reproduced the natural progression of MDS, as NHD13 transgenic mice show mild-moderate anemia and remain healthy for an extended period (typically 6–10 months) but develop progressively worsening cytopenias or transform to acute leukemia, most commonly between 10 and 14 months, with >90% of mice surviving less than 14 months [93]. Progression to acute leukemia was accompanied by spontaneous acquired mutations in genes commonly mutated in human MDS, such as Nras, Kras, Ptpn11, and Cbl [57].

The MDS seen in NHD13 mice was cell-autonomous, as WT mice transplanted with NHD13 bone marrow inevitably developed MDS, characterized by outcompeting WT bone marrow, macrocytic anemia, dysplasia, and transformation to AML. Additional transplant assays analyzed BME cellular elements from NHD13 mice, and found increased endothelial cells, decreased megakaryocytes and dysfunctional osteoblastic and mesenchymal cell populations [94]. Inflammatory cytokines shown to be increased in human MDS were also elevated in NHD13 mice suggesting that this model may capture aspects of the interplay between BMME and MDS pathogenesis [94]. In addition, transplantation of MHC matched WT bone marrow into NHD13 recipients led to increased survival, but not cure, of the transplant recipients, while transplant of MHC mismatched bone marrow led to an increased graft versus tumor effect [95]. The utility of this model for pre-clinical drug development is underscored by the fact that NHD13 mice were used to provide proof-of-concept for luspatercept, the only new drug to receive FDA approval for MDS in the past decade (100,101).

Conclusion

Successful MDS models should be reproducible, user-friendly, and dynamic tools that are able to accurately replicate the complex biological features of MDS. Ideal models would be “living” entities that reproduce the intricate communication between HSCs and their environment. In concept, these ideal models would allow one to individualize approach and evaluate treatment regimens while avoiding toxicities. However, although substantial progress has been made, such ideal models do not yet exist. But the MDS research community should not let “the perfect be the enemy of the good.” Despite the lack of ideal models, drugs (such as luspatercept) continue to be developed for patients with MDS using the available, less-than-ideal models described above. With the increased efforts over the past decade comes optimism that increasingly useful and dependable tools which accurately mimic MDS will continue to evolve.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this work do not represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or the United States Government.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (grant numbers ZIA SC 010378 and BC 010983).

Author contributions

All three authors, Peter D. Aplan, Steven Pavletic and Alain Mina, contributed to idea generation, provided expertise and were involved in both writing and editing of the manuscript.

Competing interests

PDA receives royalties from the NIH Office of Technology Transfer for the invention of NUP98-HOXD13 (NHD13) mice. No other conflict of interest to report.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. Papaemmanuil E Gerstung M Malcovati L Tauro S Gundem G Van Loo P Clinical and biological implications of driver mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes Blood. 2013 122 3616 27 10.1182/blood-2013-08-518886 24030381
2. Khoury JD Solary E Abla O Akkari Y Alaggio R Apperley JF The 5th edition of the World Health Organization classification of haematolymphoid tumours: myeloid and histiocytic/dendritic neoplasms Leukemia. 2022 36 1703 19 10.1038/s41375-022-01613-1 35732831
3. Arber DA Orazi A Hasserjian RP Borowitz MJ Calvo KR Kvasnicka HM International Consensus Classification of Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukemias: integrating morphologic, clinical, and genomic data Blood. 2022 140 1200 28 10.1182/blood.2022015850 35767897
4. Drexler HG Dirks WG Macleod RAF Many are called MDS cell lines: one is chosen Leuk Res 2009 33 1011 6 10.1016/j.leukres.2009.03.005 19344951
5. Martin MG Welch JS Uy GL Fehniger TA Kulkarni S Duncavage EJ Limited engraftment of low-risk myelodysplastic syndrome cells in NOD/SCID gamma-C chain knockout mice Leukemia. 2010 24 1662 4 10.1038/leu.2010.156 20668474
6. Rhyasen GW Wunderlich M Tohyama K Garcia-Manero G Mulloy JC Starczynowski DT An MDS xenograft model utilizing a patient-derived cell line Leukemia. 2014 28 1142 5 10.1038/leu.2013.372 24326684
7. Gbyli R Song Y Halene S Humanized mice as preclinical models for myeloid malignancies Biochem Pharm 2020 174 113794 10.1016/j.bcp.2020.113794 31926939
8. Reinisch A Thomas D Corces MR Zhang X Gratzinger D Hong WJ A humanized bone marrow ossicle xenotransplantation model enables improved engraftment of healthy and leukemic human hematopoietic cells Nat Med 2016 22 812 21 10.1038/nm.4103 27213817
9. Reinisch A Hernandez DC Schallmoser K Majeti R Generation and use of a humanized bone-marrow-ossicle niche for hematopoietic xenotransplantation into mice Nat Protoc 2017 12 2169 88 10.1038/nprot.2017.088 28933777
10. Minegishi N Minegishi M Tsuchiya S Fujie H Nagai T Hayashi N Erythropoietin-dependent induction of hemoglobin synthesis in a cytokine-dependent cell line M-TAT J Biol Chem 1994 269 27700 4 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)47042-1 7961690
11. Tohyama K Tsutani H Ueda T Nakamura T Yoshida Y Establishment and characterization of a novel myeloid cell line from the bone marrow of a patient with the myelodysplastic syndrome Br J Haematol 1994 87 235 42 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1994.tb04904.x 7947263
12. Kida JI Tsujioka T Suemori SI Okamoto S Sakakibara K Takahata T An MDS-derived cell line and a series of its sublines serve as an in vitro model for the leukemic evolution of MDS Leukemia. 2018 32 1846 50 10.1038/s41375-018-0189-7 29955132
13. Matsuoka A Tochigi A Kishimoto M Nakahara T Kondo T Tsujioka T Lenalidomide induces cell death in an MDS-derived cell line with deletion of chromosome 5q by inhibition of cytokinesis Leukemia. 2010 24 748 55 10.1038/leu.2009.296 20130600
14. Krönke J Fink EC Hollenbach PW MacBeth KJ Hurst SN Udeshi ND Lenalidomide induces ubiquitination and degradation of CK1α in del(5q) MDS Nature. 2015 523 183 8 10.1038/nature14610 26131937
15. Fang J Liu X Bolanos L Barker B Rigolino C Cortelezzi A A calcium- and calpain-dependent pathway determines the response to lenalidomide in myelodysplastic syndromes Nat Med 2016 22 727 34 10.1038/nm.4127 27294874
16. Mishima Y Terui Y Mishima Y Katsuyama M Mori M Tomizuka H New human myelodysplastic cell line, TER-3: G-CSF specific downregulation of Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IV J Cell Physiol 2002 191 183 90 10.1002/jcp.10095 12064461
17. Lapidot T Sirard C Vormoor J Murdoch B Hoang T Caceres-Cortes J A cell initiating human acute myeloid leukaemia after transplantation into SCID mice Nature. 1994 367 645 8 10.1038/367645a0 7509044
18. Bosma GC Custer RP Bosma MJ A severe combined immunodeficiency mutation in the mouse Nature 1983 301 527 30 10.1038/301527a0 6823332
19. Prochazka M Gaskins HR Shultz LD Leiter EH The nonobese diabetic scid mouse: model for spontaneous thymomagenesis associated with immunodeficiency Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992 89 3290 4 10.1073/pnas.89.8.3290 1373493
20. Shultz LD Lyons BL Burzenski LM Gott B Chen X Chaleff S Human lymphoid and myeloid cell development in NOD/LtSz-scid IL2R gamma null mice engrafted with mobilized human hemopoietic stem cells J Immunol 2005 174 6477 89 10.4049/jimmunol.174.10.6477 15879151
21. Brehm MA Cuthbert A Yang C Miller DM DiIorio P Laning J Parameters for establishing humanized mouse models to study human immunity: analysis of human hematopoietic stem cell engraftment in three immunodeficient strains of mice bearing the IL2rgamma(null) mutation Clin Immunol 2010 135 84 98 10.1016/j.clim.2009.12.008 20096637
22. Ito R Takahashi T Katano I Ito M Current advances in humanized mouse models Cell Mol Immunol 2012 9 208 14 10.1038/cmi.2012.2 22327211
23. Krevvata M Shan X Zhou C Dos Santos C Habineza Ndikuyeze G Secreto A Cytokines increase engraftment of human acute myeloid leukemia cells in immunocompromised mice but not engraftment of human myelodysplastic syndrome cells Haematologica. 2018 103 959 71 10.3324/haematol.2017.183202 29545344
24. Coughlan AM Harmon C Whelan S O’Brien EC O’Reilly VP Crotty P Myeloid engraftment in humanized mice: impact of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor treatment and transgenic mouse strain Stem Cells Dev 2016 25 530 41 10.1089/scd.2015.0289 26879149
25. Zhang Y He L Selimoglu-Buet D Jego C Morabito M Willekens C Engraftment of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia cells in immunocompromised mice supports disease dependency on cytokines Blood Adv 2017 1 972 9 10.1182/bloodadvances.2017004903 29296739
26. Wunderlich M Chou FS Link KA Mizukawa B Perry RL Carroll M AML xenograft efficiency is significantly improved in NOD/SCID-IL2RG mice constitutively expressing human SCF, GM-CSF and IL-3 Leukemia. 2010 24 1785 8 10.1038/leu.2010.158 20686503
27. Rongvaux A Willinger T Martinek J Strowig T Gearty SV Teichmann LL Development and function of human innate immune cells in a humanized mouse model Nat Biotechnol 2014 32 364 72 10.1038/nbt.2858 24633240
28. Saito Y Ellegast JM Rafiei A Song Y Kull D Heikenwalder M Peripheral blood CD34+ cells efficiently engraft human cytokine knock-in mice Blood. 2016 128 1829 33 10.1182/blood-2015-10-676452 27543436
29. Sippel TR Radtke S Olsen TM Kiem HP Rongvaux A Human hematopoietic stem cell maintenance and myeloid cell development in next-generation humanized mouse models Blood Adv 2019 3 268 74 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018023887 30696625
30. Song Y Rongvaux A Taylor A Jiang T Tebaldi T Balasubramanian K A highly efficient and faithful MDS patient-derived xenotransplantation model for pre-clinical studies Nat Commun 2019 10 366 10.1038/s41467-018-08166-x 30664659
31. Stevens BM Khan N D’Alessandro A Nemkov T Winters A Jones CL Characterization and targeting of malignant stem cells in patients with advanced myelodysplastic syndromes Nat Commun 2018 9 3694 10.1038/s41467-018-05984-x 30209285
32. Pang WW Czechowicz A Logan AC Bhardwaj R Poyser J Park CY Anti-CD117 antibody depletes normal and myelodysplastic syndrome human hematopoietic stem cells in xenografted mice Blood. 2019 133 2069 78 10.1182/blood-2018-06-858159 30745302
33. Mendelson A Frenette PS Hematopoietic stem cell niche maintenance during homeostasis and regeneration Nat Med 2014 20 833 46 10.1038/nm.3647 25100529
34. Thanopoulou E Cashman J Kakagianne T Eaves A Zoumbos N Eaves C Engraftment of NOD/SCID-beta2 microglobulin null mice with multilineage neoplastic cells from patients with myelodysplastic syndrome Blood. 2004 103 4285 93 10.1182/blood-2003-09-3192 14962905
35. Muguruma Y Matsushita H Yahata T Yumino S Tanaka Y Miyachi H Establishment of a xenograft model of human myelodysplastic syndromes Haematologica. 2011 96 543 51 10.3324/haematol.2010.027557 21193418
36. Medyouf H Mossner M Jann JC Nolte F Raffel S Herrmann C Myelodysplastic cells in patients reprogram mesenchymal stromal cells to establish a transplantable stem cell niche disease unit Cell Stem Cell 2014 14 824 37 10.1016/j.stem.2014.02.014 24704494
37. Schmitt N Jann JC Altrock E Flach J Danner J Uhlig S Preclinical evaluation of eltrombopag in a PDX model of myelodysplastic syndromes Leukemia. 2022 36 236 47 10.1038/s41375-021-01327-w 34172896
38. Xu Q Streuer A Jann JC Altrock E Schmitt N Flach J Inhibition of lysyl oxidases synergizes with 5-azacytidine to restore erythropoiesis in myelodysplastic and myeloid malignancies Nat Commun 2023 14 1497 10.1038/s41467-023-37175-8 36932114
39. Altrock E Sens-Albert C Jann JC Flach J Riabov V Schmitt N Humanized three-dimensional scaffold xenotransplantation models for myelodysplastic syndromes Exp Hematol 2022 107 38 50 10.1016/j.exphem.2021.12.395 34952140
40. Abarrategi A Foster K Hamilton A Mian SA Passaro D Gribben J Versatile humanized niche model enables study of normal and malignant human hematopoiesis J Clin Investig 2017 127 543 8 10.1172/JCI89364 28067666
41. Rouault-Pierre K Mian SA Goulard M Abarrategi A Di Tulio A Smith AE Preclinical modeling of myelodysplastic syndromes Leukemia. 2017 31 2702 8 10.1038/leu.2017.172 28663577
42. Schaeffer A Czlonka E Tirado-González I Böse T Beauvarlet J Kur I Development and exploitation of a fully human and modular organotypic bone marrow niche model to study the role of stroma-produced factors in human MDS Blood. 2020 136 23 10.1182/blood-2020-142782
43. Antonelli A Noort WA Jaques J de Boer B de Jong-Korlaar R Brouwers-Vos AZ Establishing human leukemia xenograft mouse models by implanting human bone marrow-like scaffold-based niches Blood. 2016 128 2949 59 10.1182/blood-2016-05-719021 27733356
44. Mian SA Abarrategi A Kong KL Rouault-Pierre K Wood H Oedekoven CA Ectopic humanized mesenchymal niche in mice enables robust engraftment of myelodysplastic stem cells Blood Cancer Discov 2021 2 135 45 10.1158/2643-3230.BCD-20-0161 33778768
45. Khan AO Rodriguez-Romera A Reyat JS Olijnik AA Colombo M Wang G Human bone marrow organoids for disease modeling, discovery, and validation of therapeutic targets in hematologic malignancies Cancer Discov 2023 13 364 85 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-22-0199 36351055
46. Kogan SC Ward JM Anver MR Berman JJ Brayton C Cardiff RD Bethesda proposals for classification of nonlymphoid hematopoietic neoplasms in mice Blood. 2002 100 238 45 10.1182/blood.V100.1.238 12070033
47. Zhou T Kinney MC Scott LM Zinkel SS Rebel VI Revisiting the case for genetically engineered mouse models in human myelodysplastic syndrome research Blood. 2015 126 1057 68 10.1182/blood-2015-01-624239 26077396
48. Das M Chaudhuri S Law S Benzene exposure-an experimental machinery for induction of myelodysplastic syndrome: stem cell and stem cell niche analysis in the bone marrow J Stem Cells 2012 7 43 59 23550343
49. Li W Schnatter AR Benzene risk assessment: does new evidence on myelodysplastic syndrome justify a new approach? Crit Rev Toxicol 2018 48 417 32 10.1080/10408444.2018.1437389 29745826
50. Fenske TS McMahon C Edwin D Jarvis JC Cheverud JM Minn M Identification of candidate alkylator-induced cancer susceptibility genes by whole genome scanning in mice Cancer Res 2006 66 5029 38 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3404 16707424
51. Mahgoub N Taylor BR le Beau MM Gratiot M Carlson KM Atwater SK Myeloid malignancies induced by alkylating agents in Nf1 mice Blood. 1999 93 3617 23 10.1182/blood.V93.11.3617 10339466
52. Suzuki T Shen H Akagi K Morse HC Malley JD Naiman DQ New genes involved in cancer identified by retroviral tagging Nat Genet 2002 32 166 74 10.1038/ng949 12185365
53. Beachy SH Aplan PD Mouse models of myelodysplastic syndromes Hematol Oncol Clin N Am 2010 24 361 75 10.1016/j.hoc.2010.02.002
54. Parekh C Crooks GM Critical differences in hematopoiesis and lymphoid development between humans and mice J Clin Immunol 2013 33 711 5 10.1007/s10875-012-9844-3 23274800
55. Slape C Liu LY Beachy S Aplan PD Leukemic transformation in mice expressing a NUP98-HOXD13 transgene is accompanied by spontaneous mutations in Nras, Kras, and Cbl Blood 2008 112 2017 9 10.1182/blood-2008-01-135186 18566322
56. Gough SM Goldberg L Pineda M Walker RL Zhu YJ Bilke S Progenitor B-1 B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia is associated with collaborative mutations in 3 critical pathways Blood Adv 2017 1 1749 59 10.1182/bloodadvances.2017009837 29296821
57. Delhommeau F Dupont S della Valle V James C Trannoy S Massé A Mutation in TET2 in myeloid cancers N Engl J Med 2009 360 2289 301 10.1056/NEJMoa0810069 19474426
58. Figueroa ME Abdel-Wahab O Lu C Ward PS Patel J Shih A Leukemic IDH1 and IDH2 mutations result in a hypermethylation phenotype, disrupt TET2 function, and impair hematopoietic differentiation Cancer Cell 2010 18 553 67 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.11.015 21130701
59. Ko M Huang Y Jankowska AM Pape UJ Tahiliani M Bandukwala HS Impaired hydroxylation of 5-methylcytosine in myeloid cancers with mutant TET2 Nature. 2010 468 839 43 10.1038/nature09586 21057493
60. Moran-Crusio K Reavie L Shih A Abdel-Wahab O Ndiaye-Lobry D Lobry C Tet2 loss leads to increased hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal and myeloid transformation Cancer Cell 2011 20 11 24 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.06.001 21723200
61. Muto T Sashida G Oshima M Wendt GR Mochizuki-Kashio M Nagata Y Concurrent loss of Ezh2 and Tet2 cooperates in the pathogenesis of myelodysplastic disorders J Exp Med 2013 210 2627 39 10.1084/jem.20131144 24218139
62. Ernst T Chase AJ Score J Hidalgo-Curtis CE Bryant C Jones AV Inactivating mutations of the histone methyltransferase gene EZH2 in myeloid disorders Nat Genet 2010 42 722 6 10.1038/ng.621 20601953
63. Nikoloski G Langemeijer SMC Kuiper RP Knops R Massop M Tönnissen ERLTM, et al. Somatic mutations of the histone methyltransferase gene EZH2 in myelodysplastic syndromes Nat Genet 2010 42 665 7 10.1038/ng.620 20601954
64. Raza A Galili N The genetic basis of phenotypic heterogeneity in myelodysplastic syndromes Nat Rev Cancer 2012 12 849 59 10.1038/nrc3321 23175121
65. Shih AH Abdel-Wahab O Patel JP Levine RL The role of mutations in epigenetic regulators in myeloid malignancies Nat Rev Cancer 2012 12 599 612 10.1038/nrc3343 22898539
66. Yoshida K Sanada M Shiraishi Y Nowak D Nagata Y Yamamoto R Frequent pathway mutations of splicing machinery in myelodysplasia Nature. 2011 478 64 9 10.1038/nature10496 21909114
67. Sperling AS Gibson CJ Ebert BL The genetics of myelodysplastic syndrome: from clonal haematopoiesis to secondary leukaemia Nat Rev Cancer 2017 17 5 19 10.1038/nrc.2016.112 27834397
68. Haferlach T Nagata Y Grossmann V Okuno Y Bacher U Nagae G Landscape of genetic lesions in 944 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes Leukemia. 2014 28 241 7 10.1038/leu.2013.336 24220272
69. Kim E Ilagan JO Liang Y Daubner GM Lee SCW Ramakrishnan A SRSF2 mutations contribute to myelodysplasia by mutant-specific effects on exon recognition Cancer Cell 2015 27 617 30 10.1016/j.ccell.2015.04.006 25965569
70. Shirai CL Ley JN White BS Kim S Tibbitts J Shao J Mutant U2AF1 expression alters hematopoiesis and pre-mRNA splicing in vivo Cancer Cell 2015 27 631 43 10.1016/j.ccell.2015.04.008 25965570
71. Smeets MF Tan SY Xu JJ Anande G Unnikrishnan A Chalk AM Srsf2P95H initiates myeloid bias and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative syndrome from hemopoietic stem cells Blood. 2018 132 608 21 10.1182/blood-2018-04-845602 29903888
72. Mupo A Seiler M Sathiaseelan V Pance A Yang Y Agrawal AA Hemopoietic-specific Sf3b1-K700E knock-in mice display the splicing defect seen in human MDS but develop anemia without ring sideroblasts Leukemia. 2017 31 720 7 10.1038/leu.2016.251 27604819
73. Shirai CL White BS Tripathi M Tapia R Ley JN Ndonwi M Mutant U2AF1-expressing cells are sensitive to pharmacological modulation of the spliceosome Nat Commun 2017 8 14060 10.1038/ncomms14060 28067246
74. Fei DL Zhen T Durham B Ferrarone J Zhang T Garrett L Impaired hematopoiesis and leukemia development in mice with a conditional knock-in allele of a mutant splicing factor gene U2af1 Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2018 115 E10437 46 10.1073/pnas.1812669115 30322915
75. Patnaik MM Tefferi A Refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts (RARS) and RARS with thrombocytosis (RARS-T): 2017 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management Am J Hematol 2017 92 297 310 10.1002/ajh.24637 28188970
76. Obeng EA Chappell RJ Seiler M Chen MC Campagna DR Schmidt PJ Physiologic expression of Sf3b1 K700E causes impaired erythropoiesis, aberrant splicing, and sensitivity to therapeutic spliceosome modulation Cancer Cell 2016 30 404 17 10.1016/j.ccell.2016.08.006 27622333
77. Wu SJ Kuo YY Hou HA Li LY Tseng MH Huang CF The clinical implication of SRSF2 mutation in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and its stability during disease evolution Blood 2012 120 3106 11 10.1182/blood-2012-02-412296 22932795
78. Gangat N Patnaik MM Tefferi A Myelodysplastic syndromes: contemporary review and how we treat Am J Hematol 2016 91 76 89 10.1002/ajh.24253 26769228
79. Kon A Yamazaki S Nannya Y Kataoka K Ota Y Nakagawa MM Physiological Srsf2 P95H expression causes impaired hematopoietic stem cell functions and aberrant RNA splicing in mice Blood. 2018 131 621 35 10.1182/blood-2017-01-762393 29146882
80. Mian SA Bonnet D Nature or nurture? Role of the bone marrow microenvironment in the genesis and maintenance of myelodysplastic syndromes Cancers 2021 13 4116 10.3390/cancers13164116 34439269
81. Lu J Guo S Ebert BL Zhang H Peng X Bosco J MicroRNA-mediated control of cell fate in megakaryocyte-erythrocyte progenitors Dev Cell 2008 14 843 53 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.03.012 18539114
82. Krol J Fiszer A Mykowska A Sobczak K de Mezer M Krzyzosiak WJ Ribonuclease dicer cleaves triplet repeat hairpins into shorter repeats that silence specific targets Mol Cell 2007 25 575 86 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.01.031 17317629
83. Kumar MS Lu J Mercer KL Golub TR Jacks T Impaired microRNA processing enhances cellular transformation and tumorigenesis Nat Genet 2007 39 673 7 10.1038/ng2003 17401365
84. Raaijmakers MHGP MukherjeeS Guo S Kobayashi ZhangS T, Schoonmaker JA, et al. Bone progenitor dysfunction induces myelodysplasia and secondary leukaemia Nature 2010 464 852 7 10.1038/nature08851 20305640
85. Radu A Moore MS Blobel G The peptide repeat domain of nucleoporin Nup98 functions as a docking site in transport across the nuclear pore complex Cell 1995 81 215 22 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90331-3 7736573
86. Nakamura T Largaespada DA Shaughnessy JD Jenkins NA Copeland NG Cooperative activation of Hoxa and Pbx1-related genes in murine myeloid leukaemias Nat Genet 1996 12 149 53 10.1038/ng0296-149 8563752
87. Borrow J, Shearman AM, Stanton VP, Becher R, Collins T, Williams AJ, et al. The t(7;11)(p15;p15) translocation in acute myeloid leukaemia fuses the genes for nucleoporin NUP98 and class I homeoprotein HOXA9. Nat Genet. 1996;12:159–67.
88. Gough SM Slape CI Aplan PD NUP98 gene fusions and hematopoietic malignancies: common themes and new biologic insights Blood. 2011 118 6247 57 10.1182/blood-2011-07-328880 21948299
89. Kawagoe H Humphries R Blair A Sutherland H Hogge D Expression of HOX genes, HOX cofactors, and MLL in phenotypically and functionally defined subpopulations of leukemic and normal human hematopoietic cells Leukemia. 1999 13 687 98 10.1038/sj.leu.2401410 10374871
90. Pineault N Buske C Feuring-Buske M Abramovich C Rosten P Hogge DE Induction of acute myeloid leukemia in mice by the human leukemia-specific fusion gene NUP98-HOXD13 in concert with Meis1 Blood. 2003 101 4529 38 10.1182/blood-2002-08-2484 12543865
91. Lin YW Slape C Zhang Z Aplan PD NUP98-HOXD13 transgenic mice develop a highly penetrant, severe myelodysplastic syndrome that progresses to acute leukemia Blood. 2005 106 287 95 10.1182/blood-2004-12-4794 15755899
92. Balderman SR Li AJ Hoffman CM Frisch BJ Goodman AN LaMere MW Targeting of the bone marrow microenvironment improves outcome in a murine model of myelodysplastic syndrome Blood. 2016 127 616 25 10.1182/blood-2015-06-653113 26637787
93. Chung YJ Fry TJ Aplan PD Myeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation improves survival but is not curative in a pre-clinical model of myelodysplastic syndrome PLoS ONE 2017 12 e0185219 10.1371/journal.pone.0185219 28953912
94. Kubasch AS Fenaux P Platzbecker U Development of luspatercept to treat ineffective erythropoiesis Blood Adv 2021 5 1565 75 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002177 33687432
95. Suragani RNVS Cadena SM Cawley SM Sako D Mitchell D Li R Transforming growth factor-β superfamily ligand trap ACE-536 corrects anemia by promoting late-stage erythropoiesis Nat Med 2014 20 408 14 10.1038/nm.3512 24658078
