
==== Front
Brain Commun
Brain Commun
braincomms
Brain Communications
2632-1297
Oxford University Press UK

10.1093/braincomms/fcae142
fcae142
Review Article
AcademicSubjects/MED00310
AcademicSubjects/SCI01870
Heterogeneous genetic patterns in bilateral perisylvian polymicrogyria: insights from a Finnish family cohort
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1770-6187
Järvelä Irma Department of Medical Genetics, University of Helsinki, 00251 Helsinki, Finland

Paetau Ritva Department of Child Neurology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, 00290 Helsinki, Finland

Rajendran Yasmin Center for Statistical Genetics, Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center, Department of Neurology, Columbia University Medical Center, 10032 New York, NY, USA

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1889-8723
Acharya Anushree Center for Statistical Genetics, Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center, Department of Neurology, Columbia University Medical Center, 10032 New York, NY, USA

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7870-5655
Bharadwaj Thashi Center for Statistical Genetics, Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center, Department of Neurology, Columbia University Medical Center, 10032 New York, NY, USA

Leal Suzanne M Center for Statistical Genetics, Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center, Department of Neurology, Columbia University Medical Center, 10032 New York, NY, USA
Taub Institute, Columbia University Medical Center, 10032 New York, NY, USA

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4014-3113
Lehesjoki Anna-Elina Department of Medical Genetics, University of Helsinki, 00251 Helsinki, Finland
Folkhälsan Research Center, 00290 Helsinki, Finland

Palomäki Maarit Medical Imaging Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, 00290 Helsinki, Finland

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7310-6082
Schrauwen Isabelle Center for Statistical Genetics, Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center, Department of Neurology, Columbia University Medical Center, 10032 New York, NY, USA

Correspondence to: Irma Järvelä, MD, PhD Department of Medical Genetics, University of Helsinki PO Box 720, 00251 Helsinki, Finland E-mail: irma.jarvela@helsinki.fi
Correspondence may also be addressed to: Isabelle Schrauwen, PhD Center for Statistical Genetics, Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center Department of Neurology, Columbia University Medical Center 630 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032, USA E-mail: is2632@cumc.columbia.edu
2024
18 4 2024
18 4 2024
6 3 fcae14208 12 2023
21 2 2024
16 4 2024
06 5 2024
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Bilateral perisylvian polymicrogyria is the most common form of regional polymicrogyria within malformations of cortical development, constituting 20% of all malformations of cortical development. Bilateral perisylvian polymicrogyria is characterized by an excessive folding of the cerebral cortex and abnormal cortical layering. Notable clinical features include upper motoneuron dysfunction, dysarthria and asymmetric quadriparesis. Cognitive impairment and epilepsy are frequently observed. To identify genetic variants underlying bilateral perisylvian polymicrogyria in Finland, we examined 21 families using standard exome sequencing, complemented by optical genome mapping and/or deep exome sequencing. Pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were identified in 5/21 (24%) of families, of which all were confirmed as de novo. These variants were identified in five genes, i.e. DDX23, NUS1, SCN3A, TUBA1A and TUBB2B, with NUS1 and DDX23 being associated with bilateral perisylvian polymicrogyria for the first time. In conclusion, our results confirm the previously reported genetic heterogeneity of bilateral perisylvian polymicrogyria and underscore the necessity of more advanced methods to elucidate the genetic background of bilateral perisylvian polymicrogyria.

Järvelä et al. report de novo pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in five genes underlying bilateral perisylvian polymicrogyria in a Finnish cohort using exome sequencing, optical genome mapping and deep sequencing. The outcome identified variants in 24% of families, expanding the genetic heterogeneity of bilateral perisylvian polymicrogyria.

Graphical Abstract

Graphical Abstract

biparietal perisylvian polymicrogyria
exome sequencing
gene
de novo
optical genome mapping
Helsinki University Central Hospital 10.13039/100008376 TLK0278 TRTR019 National Institutes of Health 10.13039/100000002 R21 NS123325 R01 HD109342
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Malformations of cortical development (MCD) are rare congenital anomalies of the cerebral cortex falling under neuronal migration defects.1 MCDs are classified into three major groups: malformations caused by abnormal cell proliferation, misdirected neuronal migration, or aberrant post-migrational cortical organization and connectivity.1,2 Polymicrogyria (PMG) is the most common form accounting for 20% of all MCDs.3 PMG is characterized by an overfolding of the cerebral cortex and abnormal cortical layering, which is diagnosed by brain imaging such as MRI. Both genetic (non-syndromic and syndromic forms) and non-genetic causes have been reported for PMG.4 Currently, ∼50 genes have been identified as responsible for PMGs, accounting for ∼20–32% of the cases.4-8

Bilateral perisylvian polymicrogyria (BPP) is the most common type of regional PMG.9 The major clinical features include upper motor neuron dysfunction, dysarthria and asymmetric quadriparesis. Cognitive impairment and different types of epilepsy have also been described. The clinical features in PMG, and even in BPP, can be quite variable and heterogeneous.

For BPP, Mirzaa et al.5 identified a recurrent mosaic variant (p.Gly373Arg) in PIK3R2. We previously discovered a pathogenic variant in SCN3A that underlies a unique neurodevelopmental channelopathy in a Finnish BPP cohort.8 In this study, we used a stepwise approach of standard exome sequencing (ES), followed by deep ES sequencing of buccal-derived DNA (ectoderm lineage) and/or optical mapping (OGM) to find genetic causes for 21 families in a Finnish BPP cohort.

Materials and methods

Study approval

Written informed consent was obtained from the parents and the patients according to the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained to publish photographs of the patients. The study was approved by the ethics committees of the Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa (HUS/2532/2017) and the Institutional Review Boards of Columbia University (IRB-AAAS3433).

Family ascertainment and phenotype analysis

A total of 21 Finnish families with 22 cases of BPP detected by MRI were enrolled in the study. The samples were collected between 1998 and 2023 and included 18 trios, 2 duos and 1 singleton case. Affected individuals were clinically evaluated by one of the authors (R.P.). None of the individuals had extrinsic non-genetic causes, including vascular, hypoxic insults or congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Peripheral blood samples were collected from study participants that included both affected and unaffected family members. Genomic DNA was isolated following standard procedures. Families with inconclusive/negative exome results were studied further via deep buccal sequencing and/or OGM. Unfortunately, we were unable to collect a buccal sample and/or an additional blood sample for certain negative/inconclusive families (Supplementary Table 1). Ultra-high-molecular-weight (UHMW) DNA from frozen peripheral blood samples of eight individuals was extracted using the Prep SP Blood and Cell Culture DNA Isolation Kit (Bionano Genomics, San Diego, CA, USA). Buccal epithelial cells were collected from nine affected individuals. Buccal DNA was isolated using the prepIT L2P extraction kit (DNA Genotek Inc., Ottawa, ON, Canada).

ES and bioinformatic analysis

Exomic libraries were prepared using the SureSelect Human All Exon V6 kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Paired-end sequencing was performed on a NovaSeq6000 instrument (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), targeting 50× for standard ES (using blood-derived DNA) and 200× for deep ES (using buccal-derived DNA). Reads were aligned to the human genome (hg38) using Burrows–Wheeler alignment-maximal exact match (MEM),10 and single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and small insertion/deletions (indels) were called following the Genome Analysis Toolkit best practices in variant calling.11 Copy number variants (CNVs) were called using Copy Number Inference from Exome Reads12 (PMID: 22585873).

Rare variants following several inheritance models (e.g. de novo, autosomal recessive, autosomal dominant and X-linked) with a predicted effect on protein function or pre-mRNA splicing were retained. We also performed an additional analysis to detect variants present only in the ectodermal lineage (buccal). In this case, standard and deep exome sequences of the same cases were called jointly, and variants present in the standard exome sequence data were excluded.

Sanger sequencing was performed using an ABI3130XL Genetic Analyzer to verify candidate SNV and InDel variants and to examine segregation among the family members that were not exome-sequenced. The classification of variants is based on the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics recommendations.13

Optical genome mapping and bioinformatic analysis

UHMW DNA labelling was processed with the Bionano Prep DLS DNA Labeling kit (Bionano Genomics). Labelled DNA was loaded on a Saphyr chip and run on a Saphyr instrument (Bionano Genomics), targeting ∼200× coverage. A de novo genome map assembly was performed using Bionano Solve™, followed by structural variant calling. Data were analysed with Bionano Access™ and was further annotated with annotSV14 and biomaRt.15 Rare variants, based on their frequency in the Database of Genomic Variants, dbVar (NCBI), gnomAD and 279 controls from Bionano Genomics, were prioritized.

Results

We found novel pathogenic (P)/likely pathogenic (LP) variants in five genes known to underlie a neurodevelopmental disorder in 21 (24%) families with BPP using ES (Table 1; Supplementary Materials). All of them were de novo. Their brain MRI images are presented in Fig. 1. Detailed clinical information is given in Supplementary Materials.

Figure 1 Brain MR images of patients with pathogenic or likely pathogenic gene variants. The subject with an SCN3A variant shows BPP and thick grey matter over the frontal, parietal and perisylvian cortexes (A, B). The subject with a TUBB2B variant has bilateral fronto-parietal, perisylvian and insular polymicrogyria (C, D). The subject with an NUS1 variant has a similar pattern of distribution of polymicrogyria as seen with SCN3A and TUBB2B but additional white matter changes around the posterior horn of the lateral ventricles (E, F). The subject with a DDX23 variant has asymmetric patches of frontal, parietal and insular/perisylvian polymicrogyria (G, H). The polymicrogyric cortex of the subject with a TUBA1A variant is limited to the opercular and insular cortexes (I, J). SCN3A, the sodium voltage–gated channel alpha subunit 3; TUBB2B, tubulin 2B; NUS1, dehydrodolichyl diphosphate synthase subunit; DDX23, DEAD-box RNA helicase 23 gene; TUBA1A, tubulin alpha-1A.

Table 1 Identification of pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants in BPP

Patient #	Sex	Age	Gene	Variant	Inheritance	Severity of ID or DD	MRI/CT	Other features	ACMG	Evidence	
FINLIS2	M	18	SCN3A	NM_006922.4:c.4862G>A:p.(R1621Q)	De novo	Mild	BPP	Epilepsy	P	PS2, PM2, PP2, PS1, PS3	
FINLIS4	F	22	TUBB2B	NM_178012.5:c.776C>T:p.(P259L)	De novo	Mild	BPP	Epilepsy	P	PS2, PP2, PM2, PS1_sup, PM1	
FINLIS14	F	14	NUS1	NM_138459.5:c.616G>T:p.(D206Y)	De novo	Mild	BPP	Hearing impairment	LP	PS2, PM2	
FINLIS18	F	19a	DDX23	NM_004818.3:c.2437C>T:p.(R813C)	De novo	ND	BPP	Rhabdomyosarcoma	LP	PS2, PM2, PP2	
FINLIS22	F	11	TUBA1A	NM_006009.4:c.303T>A:p.(N101K)	De novo	Moderate	Insular cortex	Spastic diplegia	P	PS2, PP3, PM2, PM1, PP2, PM5	
Other identified pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants							
FINLIS1	M	34	WFS1	NM_006005.3:c.923C>G:p.(S308C)b	AD	Borderline	BPP	Wolfram-like syndrome	LP	PP1_sup, PP3, PM2, PS1	
aDeceased.

bThis variant explains only the hearing loss seen in the mother and child. The cause of BPP in the affected child remains unknown.

In FINLIS2-3, a de novo variant p.(Arg1621Gln) in the sodium voltage–gated channel alpha subunit 3 (SCN3A) gene (OMIM # 617935) was identified. He presented with severe oral motor dysfunction and autonomic seizures from infancy. At 15 years, he experienced tonic–clonic seizures, but these were ameliorated with valproate and oxcarbazepine treatment. He has mild intellectual disability (ID). A brain MRI identified BPP.

FINLIS4-3 had a de novo missense variant p.(Pro259Leu) in tubulin 2B (TUBB2B) (OMIM # 610031). Her phenotype was characterized by mild right-dominant tetraplegia, severe dysarthria, nocturnal epileptic myoclonus, mild ID and bilateral perisylvian and perirolandic PMG.

FINLIS14-3 had a de novo missense p.(Asp206Tyr) variant in the dehydrodolichyl diphosphate synthase subunit (NUS1; OMIM # 617831). The phenotype was characterized by mild right-hand paresis, severe oral-motor and oral sensory problems, severe congenital sensorineural deafness (diagnosed at 2 years of age) and mild ID. She has no epilepsy or dysmorphism. Her social skills are good but challenged by anxiety in daily activities. Her MRI displayed BPP and bilateral white matter changes around the posterior horns of the lateral ventricles.

FINLIS18-3 had a de novo missense variant p.(Arg813Cys) in the DEAD-box RNA helicase 23 gene (DDX23; OMIM # 612172). The phenotype was severe, including problems of swallowing with aspiration that led to tube feeding and permanent tracheostomy as a newborn. Permanent gastrostomy for feeding was inserted at 2.5 years of age. Due to the hypoplastic lower jaw, the tongue and the epiglottis and the paralysed tongue and pharyngeal muscles, she could not swallow. She learnt to walk from 3 years of age but never learnt to produce any vocalization. At 7 years of age, her neuropsychological profile showed normal performance. A brain MRI at ages 4 and 8 showed BPP. At 16 years of age, an aggressive rhabdomyosarcoma appeared in the left cheek, resistant to radiation and chemotherapies that invaded large areas of the neck and extra-cranial structures, and finally, the left hemisphere. She passed away at 19 years of age.

FINLIS22-3 has a de novo missense variant in the N-terminal region in Exon 3 (p.Asn101Lys) of tubulin alpha-1A (TUBA1A), a well-known gene for MCDs.16 Her oral motor function is close to normal, whilst spastic diplegia and moderate ID dominate the phenotype. A brain MRI demonstrated that BPP is mainly located in the insular cortex.

The underlying cause of BPP was not identified for the proband in FINLIS1. However, in addition to BPP, the affected son and his unaffected mother have hearing impairment. We identified a previously reported17 missense variant p.(Ser308Cys) in Wolframin ER Transmembrane Glycoprotein (WFS1) underlying autosomal-dominant Wolfram-like syndrome (#OMIM 614296) in both the mother and the son. This agrees with the segregation of autosomal-dominant hearing impairment in this family (data not available) but does not explain BPP.

ES revealed variants of unknown significance in several families (Supplementary Table 2; Supplementary Materials). Deep ES of buccal epithelial DNA was utilized in nine inconclusive/negative cases, where a sample could be obtained. No disease-causing variants were identified (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2). Eight subjects, with available frozen blood samples, whose ES did not reveal a relevant candidate gene, were analysed using OGM, but no variants were identified (Supplementary Table 1). In addition, no CNVs were found through ES.

Discussion

We applied standard ES, followed by deep ES of buccal samples and/or OGM to identify the genetic causes of BPP. We found pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in 24% of the analysed families, all of which were de novo. The results are similar to those of previous studies.4,7 In addition to identifying variants in well-known BPP genes, i.e. TUBA1A, TUBB2B and SCN3A,6,8 we propose DDX23, a member of the RNA-helicase gene family,18 and NUS119 as novel genes underlying BPP, expanding their phenotypic spectrum.

Interestingly, Zaman et al.20 reported the same variant p.(Arg1621Gln) in SCN3A identified by us in a patient with severe ID, and normal EEG and a different variant in the same codon p.(Arg1621Gly), in a patient with severe ID and pseudobulbar palsy. We previously reported a different variant p.(Phe1759Tyr) in SCN3A in a large Finnish family with BPP.8 The cognition of the affected individuals ranged from mild ID to borderline intelligence.8

TUBA1A and TUBB2B belong to tubulinopathies associated with a wide range of MCDs.17,21,22 Among individuals with PMG, including the most common perisylvian subtype, TUBA1A variants have been found in 3.1% of all patients with PMG and in 10% of PMG with complex cerebral malformations.17 Pathogenic TUBB2B variants have been estimated to be involved in 2.3% of MCDs.23 The clinical phenotypes caused by the variants of TUBA1A can vary considerably; most affected patients have congenital microcephaly and severe neurodevelopmental delay with di/tetraplegia.1 FINLIS22-3 had BPP mainly located in the insular cortex. She had normocephaly, a relatively mild upper motor neuron dysfunction and no epilepsy. TUBA1A variants were found as the most common cause of microlissencephalies in foetuses.22 The missense variant p.(Asn101Lys) in TUBA1A in FINLIS22-3 was located in the same codon as previously described in a foetus with p.(Asn101Ser) that showed a poorly differentiated cortical plate22 and in a person with microlissencephaly.21 FINLIS4-3 with a pathogenic missense variant p.(Pro259Leu) in TUBB2B had bilateral perisylvian and perirolandic PMG. Previously, TUBB2B variants have been reported to underlie more extensive brain malformations and severe phenotypes.24 Of note, patients with tubulinopathy in our study had a normal corpus callosum, brainstem and cerebellum. Our results further strengthen the role of tubulin genes in BPP and suggest further heterogeneity both in clinical features and in MRI findings.

We propose phenotypic expansions of two known disease genes, NUS1 and DDX23, to include BPP. NUS1 variants are associated with a wide spectrum of phenotypes.25 In addition to the characteristic features of BPP (mild right-hand paresis, severe oral-motor problems and oral sensory problems), a patient in this study had severe congenital sensorineural deafness. In her ES, we did not find a separate variant in a gene that would explain her deafness. However, hearing impairment is seen in patients with autosomal recessive NUS1 (a congenital disorder of glycosylation; OMIM # 617082).26

DDX23 belongs to the DExD/H-box RNA helicase genes that have been associated with multi-organ diseases, neurodevelopmental disorders, brain malformations and several types of cancer.18,27,28  DDX23 (OMIM #612172) has recently been reported to be associated with a novel syndromic neurodevelopmental disorder.29 The phenotype includes developmental delay, muscle tone abnormalities and dysmorphic features. Brain abnormalities, including decreased white matter, corpus callosum abnormalities and grey matter heterotopia, have been noted in some patients.29,30 The variant p.(Arg813Cys) is located near the C-terminal RecA-like domain at the 3′ end of the DDX23 gene at a highly conserved amino acid (GERPRS: 5.97) and may explain the severe phenotype of FINLIS18-3. Yin et al.28 have reported that DDX23 has a role in promoting the malignancy of gliomas in the brain. It is intriguing to speculate whether DDX23 was associated with both BPP and rhabdomyosarcoma in the young female FINLIS18-3 in this study. Interestingly, PMG has also been reported in patients with pathogenic variants in another helicase genes DHX3718 and DDX3X.31

Finally, despite incorporating various genomic techniques alongside standard-coverage ES, the diagnostic yield of BPP in this investigation aligns closely with findings from prior studies. However, it remains notably lower than diagnostic rates for other congenital brain malformations, such as lissencephaly, in which the diagnostic rate is ∼80%.32 This discrepancy may be attributed to an increase in somatic variants that are exclusively present in a few or single tissues. In addition, the variant may have a very low-level mosaic in the tissues studied here (blood/buccal) and therefore may need a deeper analysis than 200×. To enhance the identification of causal variants in these disorders, there is a pressing need for the adoption of more sophisticated, preferably minimally invasive sampling techniques and sequencing methodologies.

In summary, our data suggest an increased incidence of phenotypic and genotypic heterogeneity of BPP and call for the use of new methods to elucidate the biological background of BPP.

Supplementary Material

fcae142_Supplementary_Data

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the patients and their families for their participation in this study. We are grateful for the technical help provided by Paula Hakala, Minna Malmström and Riitta Koponen.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at Brain Communications online.

Funding

This work was supported by the Helsinki University Central Hospital subsidiaries TLK0278 and TRTR019 and National Institutes of Health grants R21 NS123325 to I.S. and R01 HD109342 to S.M.L. and I.S.

Competing interests

The authors report no competing interests.

Data availability

Variants have been deposited into ClinVar under accession numbers SCV004171801–SCV004171806.
==== Refs
References

1 Barkovich  AJ, Guerrini  R, Kuzniecky  RI, Jackson  GD, Dobyns  WB. A developmental and genetic classification for malformations of cortical development: Update 2012. Brain. 2012;135 :1348–1369.22427329
2 Guerrini  R, Dobyns  WB. Malformations of cortical development: Clinical features and genetic causes. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13 :710–726.24932993
3 Leventer  RJ, Phelan  EM, Coleman  LT, Kean  MJ, Jackson  GD, Harvey  AS. Clinical and imaging features of cortical malformations in childhood. Neurology. 1999;53 :715–722.10489031
4 Stutterd  CA, Brock  S, Stouffs  K, et al  Genetic heterogeneity of polymicrogyria: Study of 123 patients using deep sequencing. Brain Commun. 2020;3 :fcaa221.
5 Mirzaa  G, Conti  V, Timms  AE, et al  Characterization of mutations of the phosphoinositide-3-kinase regulatory subunit, PIK3R2, in perisylvian polymicrogyria: A next generation sequencing study. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14 (12 ):1182–1195.26520804
6 Parrini  E, Conti  V, Dobyns  WB, Guerrini  R. Genetic basis of brain malformations. Mol Syndromol. 2016;7 :220–233.27781032
7 Akula  SK, Chen  AY, Neil  JE, et al  Exome sequencing and the identification of new genes and shared mechanisms in polymicrogyria. JAMA Neurol.  2023;80 (9 ):980–988.37486637
8 Smith  RS, Kenny  CJ, Ganesh  V, et al  Sodium channel SCN3A (NaV1.3) regulation of human cerebral cortical folding and oral motor development. Neuron. 2018;99 (5 ):905–913.e7.30146301
9 Leventer  RJ, Jansen  A, Pilz  DT, et al  Clinical and imaging heterogeneity of polymicrogyria: A study of 328 patients. Brain. 2010;133 :1415–1427.20403963
10 Li  H, Durbin  R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25 (14 ):1754–1760.19451168
11 McKenna  A, Hanna  M, Banks  E, et al  The genome analysis toolkit: A MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20 (9 ):1297–1303.20644199
12 Krumm  N, Sudmant  PH, Ko  A, et al  Copy number variation detection and genotyping from exome sequence data. Genome Res. 2012;22 (8 ):1525–1532.22585873
13 Richards  S, Aziz  N, Bale  S, et al  Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: A joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17 :405–424.25741868
14 Geoffroy  V, Herenger  Y, Kress  A, et al  AnnotSV: An integrated tool for structural variations annotation. Bioinformatics. 2018;34 (20 ):3572–3574.29669011
15 Zhang  J, Haider  S, Baran  J, et al  BioMart: A data federation framework for large collaborative projects. Database (Oxford). 2011;2011 :bar038.
16 Poirier  K, Saillour  Y, Fournio  F, et al  Expanding the spectrum of TUBA1A-related cortical dysgenesis to polymicrogyria. Eur J Hum Genet. 2013;21 :381–385.22948023
17 Kobayashi  M, Miyagawa  M, Nishio  S, et al  WFS1 mutation screening in a large series of Japanese hearing loss patients: Massively parallel DNA sequencing-based analysis. PLoS One. 2018;13 (3 ):e0193359.29529044
18 Paine  I, Posey  JE, Grochowski  CM, et al  Paralog studies augment gene discovery: DDX and DHX genes. Am J Hum Genet. 2019;105 (2 ):302–316.31256877
19 Park  EJ, Grabińska  KA, Guan  Z, et al  Mutation of NgBR, a subunit of cis-prenyltransferase, causes a congenial disorder of glycosylation. Cell Metab. 2014;20 (3 ):448–457.25066056
20 Zaman  T, Helbig  KL, Clatot  J, et al  SCN3A-related neurodevelopmental disorder: A spectrum of epilepsy and brain malformation. Ann Neurol. 2020;88 (2 ):348–362.32515017
21 Bahi-Buisson  N, Poirier  K, Fourniol  F, et al  The wide spectrum of tubulinopathies: What are the key features for the diagnosis?  Brain. 2014;137 :1676–1700.24860126
22 Fallet-Bianco  C, Laquerrière  A, Poirier  K, et al  Mutations in tubulin genes are frequent causes of various foetal malformations of cortical development including microlissencephaly. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2014;2 :69.25059107
23 Cushion  TD, Dobyns  WB, Mullins  JGL, et al  Overlapping cortical malformations and mutations in TUBB2B and TUBA1A. Brain. 2013;136 :536–548.23361065
24 Guerrini  R, Mei  D, Cordelli  DM, Pucatti  D, Franzoni  E, Parrini  E. Symmetric polymicrogyria and pachygyria associated with TUBB2B gene mutations. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012;20 :995–998.22333901
25 Hu  Y, Huang  M, We  J, et al  Case report: Splicing effect of a novel heterozygous variant of the NUS1 gene in a child with epilepsy. Front Genet. 2023;14 :1224949.37470039
26 Ji  C, Zhao  J, Zhang  J, Wang  K. Novel NUS1 variant in a Chinese patient with progressive myoclonus epilepsy: A case report and systematic review. Neurol Sci. 2023;44 (10 ):3495–3498.37249665
27 Brosh  RM  Jr . DNA helicases involved in DNA repair and their roles in cancer. Nat Review Cancer. 2013;13 (8 ):542–558.23842644
28 Yin  J, Park  G, Lee  JE, et al  DEAD-box RNA helicase DDX23 modulates glioma malignancy via elevating miR-21 biogenesis. Brain. 2015;138 :2553–2570.26121981
29 Burns  W, Bird  LM, Heron  D, et al  Syndromic neurodevelopmental disorder associated with de novo variants in DDX23. Am J Med Genet A. 2021;185 (10 ):2863–2872.34050707
30 Thys  L, Beysen  D, Jansen  A, Janssens  K, Meuwissen  M. Confirmation of gray matter heterotopia as part of the DDX23 phenotypic spectrum. Am J Med Genet A. 2023;191 (9 ):2451–2453.37596899
31 Levy  T, Siper  PM, Lerman  B, et al  DDX3X syndrome: Summary of findings and recommendations for evaluation and care. Pediatr Neurol. 2023;138 :87– 894.36434914
32 Di Donato  N, Timms  AE, Aldinger  KA, et al  Analysis of 17 genes detects mutations in 81% of 811 patients with lissencephaly. Genet Med. 2018;20 (11 ):1354–1364.29671837
