
==== Front
Sci Rep
Sci Rep
Scientific Reports
2045-2322
Nature Publishing Group UK London

38600126
57472
10.1038/s41598-024-57472-6
Editorial
Current and future directions for research on hallucinations and delusions
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8525-5285
Reeder Reshanne R. reeder@liverpool.ac.uk

https://ror.org/04xs57h96 grid.10025.36 0000 0004 1936 8470 Department of Psychology, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
10 4 2024
10 4 2024
2024
14 8328© The Author(s) 2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Hallucinations and delusions can be symptoms of psychiatric illness, but more often—though less commonly known—are actually part of a healthy range of experiences found throughout the general population. The studies in this Special Collection paint a picture of the wide range of hallucinatory and delusional experiences across diverse populations, as well as comparative perspectives between clinical and non-clinical samples. In this editorial, I make three related points that are exemplified in the articles published here. First, that hallucinations and delusions are part of a normal distribution of human diversity; their mere presence does not indicate psychosis or psychiatric illness. Second, that the ubiquity of hallucinatory and delusional experiences across clinical and non-clinical populations suggests common cognitive and neural mechanisms. Finally, despite these commonalities, it is important to understand the difference between psychiatric symptoms and healthy experience. In summary, I conclude that it is important to investigate both common mechanisms and distinguishing factors to comprehensively elucidate these oft-misunderstood experiences. This Special Collection provides a showcase of the cutting-edge research that encompasses these objectives.

Subject terms

Human behaviour
Preclinical research
issue-copyright-statement© Springer Nature Limited 2024
==== Body
pmcHallucinations and delusions are two cornerstones of psychosis, a collection of symptoms that can occur across a range of psychiatric disorders and stems from a reduced ability to disentangle reality from fantasy1,2. Although it may seem that a Special Collection called Hallucinations and Delusions would mainly report studies of psychosis, these experiences are surprisingly common throughout the general population. So although psychosis is defined by hallucinatory and delusional experiences, the presence of hallucinations and delusions are not indicative of a psychotic disorder. Together, the studies in this Special Collection paint a picture of the wide range of hallucinatory and delusional experiences across diverse populations, as well as comparative perspectives between clinical and non-clinical samples. In this editorial, I would like to make three related points that are exemplified in the articles published here:Hallucinations and delusions are part of a normal distribution of human diversity; their mere presence does not indicate psychosis or psychiatric illness.

The ubiquity of hallucinatory and delusional experiences across clinical and non-clinical populations suggests common cognitive and neural mechanisms.

Despite the aforementioned commonalities, it is important to understand the difference between psychiatric symptoms and healthy experience.

A normal distribution of human diversity

Hallucinations and delusions are pat of a normal distribution of human diversity; their mere presence does not indicate psychosis or psychiatric illness. Experimentally-induced hallucinations are safe, controlled, and have no negative consequences3; confabulating memories sometimes is perfectly normal4; and despite the insistence of some individuals, simply having conspiracy beliefs is not a sign of pathology5.

The study by Shenyan et al.3 demonstrates that hallucinations can be reliably induced in non-clinical samples using experimental techniques called Ganzfeld6 and Ganzflicker7,8. Prolonged, unstructured (Ganzfeld) or repetitive (Ganzflicker) stimulation to the visual system can elicit both simple and complex hallucinatory experiences, such as geometric patterns, illusory colors, or even meaningful real-world objects and scenes. The authors, for the first time, quantified the onset and frequency of Ganzfeld- and Ganzflicker-induced hallucinations, and included participant drawings to reveal diverse, individualized visual experiences.

In another study highlighting psychosis characteristics in the general population, Stephan-Otto et al.4 found that hallucination proneness is associated with false memories of novel words during a word recall task. The researchers asked participants to complete a series of questionnaires, memorize lists of high- and low-frequency words, then tested their recall while collecting fMRI data. Behaviorally, hallucination scores correlated with response bias for both high- and low-frequency words. Interestingly, neuroimaging data revealed a significant association between specifically verbal hallucination proneness and activation of brain areas related to language during false recognition of novel words. This points to individual differences in susceptibility to confabulated inner speech in the general population.

Finally, conspiracy beliefs are generally related to psychopathological characteristics (e.g., paranoia, anxiety) and erratic behavior such as volatility in decision-making9; however, in a paper published in this Collection, Suthaharan and Corlett5 found that these negative effects are reduced in individuals who have a strong social network around their beliefs. This interestingly suggests that social and environmental factors contribute to the (positive or negative) impact of conspiracy beliefs on mental health and behavior. In contrast to the stereotype of a ‘crazy conspiracy theorist’, the authors conclude that conspiracy beliefs are not inherently pathological.

Common cognitive and neural mechanisms

The ubiquity of hallucinations and delusions across clinical and non-clinical populations suggests common cognitive and neural mechanisms. We are developing techniques to experimentally induce hallucinations, which could potentially elucidate how they can develop into psychotic experiences3,7,8. In the study by Shenyan et al.3, the authors purport that a (cortically hierarchical) low-level hallucinatory mechanism may be responsible for simple hallucinations, whereas top-down processes (such as mental imagery or beliefs) may contribute to complex hallucinations. These same mechanisms are proposed to be involved in different kinds of hallucinatory experiences in clinical populations, as well10. Further, Stephan-Otto and colleagues4 propose common mechanisms for reality monitoring of inner speech in both clinical and non-clinical populations. These techniques could therefore be used to better understand the cognitive and neural mechanisms that contribute to hallucinatory experience across diverse populations.

Comparative studies in this Collection highlight similarities in the content and organization of psychotic symptoms across different populations. For example, Fleming and colleagues11 modeled a data-driven profile of symptoms experienced in first-episode psychosis (FEP) and persistent psychotic illness. Individuals with FEP are those that have only recently begun to experience symptoms of psychosis, which may or may not progress into persistent psychotic illness, specifically schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Interestingly, the multidimensional profile of symptoms is quite similar between the two groups: auditory hallucinations tended to cluster with delusions that the patient was under another agent’s control; religious and grandiose delusions both clustered with thought disorder symptoms; and other reality and perceptual distortions formed a separate cluster of symptoms to these. Therefore, the content and organization of psychotic experiences in this clinical population is not indicative or predictive of illness severity or longevity, and supports the proposition that these experiences are part of the normal distribution of diverse thinking.

Sheffield and colleagues12 investigated the relationship between cognitive biases, delusional thinking, and game-based decision-making between individuals with schizophrenia spectrum conditions and healthy controls. Interestingly, across multiple self-report measures and various games, both groups showed similar relationships between beliefs and behavior: specifically, volatile decision-making (e.g., changing strategies multiple times) was positively correlated with paranoid thinking, and hasty decision-making was related to having unusual beliefs (e.g., mind reading, alien abduction), in both individuals with schizophrenia spectrum conditions and healthy controls. These findings further support the idea that the same cognitive mechanisms contribute to individual differences in both clinical and non-clinical populations.

Psychiatric versus healthy experience. Despite potential common mechanisms for these experiences, and their prevalence across clinical and non-clinical populations, it is important to distinguish psychiatric symptoms from healthy experience. Perhaps the single most important difference between clinically-relevant and clinically-irrelevant experience is its impact on quality of life.

Environmental and social factors importantly contribute to this impact: conspiracy beliefs under a ‘sacred canopy’ (i.e., a social support buffer) can benefit an individual to a similar extent as being part of a religious or social organization; but these beliefs can exacerbate psychopathological characteristics if social support is lacking5. As another example, individuals who purposefully seek hallucinatory experiences are able to choose the environment, onset, and duration of the event; and can attribute the experience to an explicable source, such as Ganzflicker3. Controlling an unusual experience in this way can neutralize its potential negative effects. On the other hand, individuals who experience clinical hallucinations have little to no control over their experiences and cannot easily attribute them to a known source. The onset, duration, and environment of the experience are unpredictable, and can be embarrassing (e.g., at a social event) or even dangerous (e.g., while driving). All of these factors can lead to an extreme negative reaction to hallucinations and a debilitating impact on quality of life. So although much of the behavioral and cognitive bases of these divergent experiences are ubiquitous, this does not mean that these experiences should be treated the same for both clinical and non-clinical populations. The critical questions, then, concern how and why such experiences might develop into psychiatric illness.

In summary, hallucinations and delusions are part of a healthy range of diverse experiences found throughout the general population, but they can develop into more severe symptoms of psychiatric illness. It is important to investigate both common mechanisms (that contribute to our understanding of their cognitive and neural bases) and distinguishing factors (that separate clinically-relevant from clinically irrelevant symptoms) to comprehensively elucidate these often misunderstood experiences. This Special Collection provides a showcase of the cutting-edge research that encompasses these objectives.

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. Arciniegas DB Psychosis Continuum (Minneap. Minn.) 2015 21 715 736 26039850
2. Garrison JR Bond R Gibbard E Johnson MK Simons JS Monitoring what is real: The effects of modality and action on accuracy and type of reality monitoring error Cortex 2017 87 108 117 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.06.018 27444616
3. Shenyan O Lisi M Greenwood JA Skipper JI Dekker TM Visual hallucinations induced by Ganzflicker and Ganzfeld differ in frequency, complexity, and content Sci. Rep. 2024 14 2353 10.1038/s41598-024-52372-1 38287084
4. Stephan-Otto C Neurocognitive bases of self-monitoring of inner speech in hallucination prone individuals Sci. Rep. 2023 13 6251 10.1038/s41598-023-32042-4 37069194
5. Suthaharan P Corlett PR Assumed shared belief about conspiracy theories in social networks protects paranoid individuals against distress Sci. Rep. 2023 13 6084 10.1038/s41598-023-33305-w 37055504
6. Schmidt TT Prein JC The Ganzfeld experience—A stably inducible altered state of consciousness: Effects of different auditory homogenizations Psych. J. 2019 8 66 81 10.1002/pchj.262 30609322
7. Königsmark VT Bergmann J Reeder RR The Ganzflicker experience: High probability of seeing vivid and complex pseudo-hallucinations with imagery but not aphantasia Cortex 2021 141 522 534 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.05.007 34172274
8. Reeder RR Ganzflicker reveals the complex relationship between visual mental imagery and pseudo-hallucinatory experiences: A replication and expansion Collabra Psychol. 2022 8 36318 10.1525/collabra.36318
9. Suthaharan P Paranoia and belief updating during the COVID-19 crisis Nat. Hum. Behav. 2021 5 1190 1202 10.1038/s41562-021-01176-8 34316049
10 Reeder RR Sala G van Leeuwen TM A novel model of divergent predictive perception Neurosci. Conscious 2024 2024 niae006 10.1093/nc/niae006 38348335
11. Fleming LM Using dimensionality-reduction techniques to understand the organization of psychotic symptoms in persistent psychotic illness and first episode psychosis Sci. Rep. 2023 13 4841 10.1038/s41598-023-31909-w 36964175
12. Sheffield JM Smith R Suthaharan P Leptourgos P Corlett PR Relationships between cognitive biases, decision-making, and delusions Sci. Rep. 2023 13 9485 10.1038/s41598-023-36526-1 37301915
