
==== Front
Ann Clin Microbiol AntimicrobAnnals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials1476-0711BioMed Central London 1476-0711-3-171536959310.1186/1476-0711-3-17ResearchIncidence, risk factors and mortality of nosocomial pneumonia in Intensive Care Units: A prospective study Alp Emine 1ealp@erciyes.edu.trGüven Muhammet 2mguven@erciyes.edu.trYıldız Orhan 1oyildiz@erciyes.edu.trAygen Bilgehan 1baygen@erciyes.edu.trVoss Andreas 3A.Voss@mmb.umcn.nlDoganay Mehmet 1mdoganay@erciyes.edu.tr1 Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey2 Intensive Care Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey3 Medical Microbiology, University Medical Centre St Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands2004 15 9 2004 3 17 17 7 7 2004 15 9 2004 Copyright © 2004 Alp et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.2004Alp et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

To determine the frequency, risk factors and mortality of nosocomial pneumonia a prospective study was conducted in the intensive care units. In the study period, 2402 patients were included. The nosocomial pneumonia was defined according to the Centers for Disease Control Criteria. Overall, 163 (6.8%) of the patients developed nosocomial pneumonia and 75.5% (n = 123) of all patients with nosocomial pneumonia were ventilator-associated pneumonia. 163 patients who were admitted to the intensive care unit during the same period but had no bacteriologic or histologic evidence of pneumonia were used as a control group. The APACHE II score, coma, hypoalbuminemia, mechanical ventilation, tracheotomy, presence of nasogastric tube were found as independent risk factors. Crude and attributable mortality were 65% and 52.6%, respectively. The mortality rate was five times greater in the cases (OR: 5.2; CI 95%: 3.2–8.3). The mean length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital in the cases were longer than controls (p < 0.0001). Patients requiring mechanical ventilation have a high frequency of nosocomial pneumonia.

Hospital infectionsventilator-associated pneumoniadeath rates
==== Body
Background
Nosocomial pneumonia (NP) is the most frequent nosocomial infection in the intensive care units (ICU). The reported frequency varies with the definition, the type of hospital or ICU, the population of patients, and the type of rate calculated. In the recent studies, the incidence was reported as 6.8–27% [1-4]. In an one day point prevalence study in European ICUs, ICU-acquired pneumonia accounted for 46.9% of nosocomial infections [5]. The National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) system reported that NP accounts for 31% of all nosocomial infections in intensive care units [6]. The risk of pneumonia is increased in the intubated patients receiving mechanical ventilation (MV) and the ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) frequencies varied between 7–70% in different studies [7-9]. NP developed at a rate of 0.9 cases per 1000 patient-days in non-ventilated patients versus rates of 20.6 cases per 1000 patient-ventilator-days and 14.8 cases per 1000 patient-days in patients who received any MV [10]. NP is also associated with high morbidity and mortality in ICUs. The increasing incidence of infections caused by antibiotic-resistant pathogens contributes to the seriousness of these infections. The mortality rate reaches to 20–50%, and also NP caused by high-risk pathogens (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter spp., Stenotrophomonas maltophilia) are associated with higher mortality [1,11,12]. Patients with NP, stay 1 to 2 weeks longer than those without NP and result in higher costs [13].

Studies on NP are mainly reported from the United States and European countries, whereas studies from around the world are missing. The aims of this study were to assess incidence, risk factors and mortality of NP in Eurasian intensive care units.

Methods
Between February 2001 and February 2002 a prospective study was conducted among intensive care units (ICU) patients of the Erciyes University Hospital. This university hospital is a teaching hospital and full time intensivists care the patients in ICUs. Patients from the surgical ICU (SICU) (24 beds), medical ICU (MICU) (9 beds) and burn unit (7 beds) were included. The SICU consist of 8 neurosurgical (NICU), 8 general surgery (GICU) and 8 cardiac surgery (CICU) beds. Patients older than 16 yr of age were included. The same infection control doctor collected data and intensivist reviewed the diagnosis of pneumonia. Data collection included physical examination findings, APACHE II scores on admission, consciousness, risk factors (intubation, MV, presence of nasogastric tube, enteral nutrition, tracheotomy), prior surgery, immunosuppression, prior antimicrobial and antacid or histamine type 2 (H2) blocker therapy, clinical outcome, length of stay in ICU and in the hospital.

163 patients who were admitted to the ICU during the same period but had no bacteriologic or histologic evidence of pneumonia were used as a control group.

In the ICUs infection control doctor collects active surveillance data routinely and empiric antibiotic therapy is directed at the most prevalent and virulent pathogens reported in these data. Appropriate antibiotic therapy included the administration of at least one antibiotic with in vitro activity against the bacterial pathogens isolated from the patient's respiratory secretions, as well as from blood and pleural fluid when applicable [14].

NP was considered when new and persistent (more than 48 h) pulmonary infiltrates not otherwise explained appeared on chest radiographs. Moreover, at least two of the following criteria were also required: 1) fever >38°C; 2) peripheral leukocyte count >10 000/mm3; 3) purulent endotracheal secretions with a Gram stain showing one or more types of bacteria [15]. VAP was considered when its onset occurred after 48 h of MV and was judged not to have been incubated before starting MV [16]. Admission APACHE II score was used to determine the severity of the illness, and attributable mortality was registered, as were laboratory values, electrocardiogram, x-ray, and arterial blood gas values.

Extra length of stay was calculated comparing the extra stay after onset of pneumonia in the cases and after a reference date (the mean value of the extra stay after onset of pneumonia in the cases) in the control group.

Microbiology
Giemsa stains of sputum samples were performed for all patients. Sputum samples, containing more than 25 polimorphonuclear leukocyte (pnl) and less than 10 (×100) epithel were classified as purulent. If necessary, samples were obtained by nasotracheal aspiration. In that case, samples containing more than 10 pnl (×1000) were defined as purulent. Quantitative cultures of all purulent samples were performed using standard methods. Susceptibility testing was performed by disc diffusion method. In the absence of an alternative diagnosis a bronchoalveolar lavage was performed. In some case, pleural fluid was obtained by thoracentesis and examined for cell count, smear, Gram- and Giemsa-staining and microbiological culture.

Statistical Analysis
All data were evaluated using SPSS. Parameters were compared using univariate and multivariate logistic regression and chi-square tests. Student t test was used to compare the extra length of stay. Data were given as mean ± SD and a p-value of <0.05 was accepted as significant.

Results
During the study period, 2402 patients were admitted to the ICUs. Distribution of patients by ICU and length of stay in the ICU are shown in table I. Overall, 163 (6.8%) of the 2402 patients developed NP; 105 (5.8%) SICU- and 58 (11.7%) MICU-patients. The demographics of the NP patients and control group are shown in table II. The percentage of NP in NICU, GICU and CICU were 7.8%, 6.3% and 1.2%, respectively. During the study period no burn unit patient developed NP. The incidence of NP in MICU-patients was much higher than in SICU-patients (X2 = 19.7, p < 0.0001). Length of stay in the MICU was significantly higher than in the SICU, 21.3 ± 21.4 versus 16.2 ± 8.8 days, respectively (p < 0.05). Characteristics of patients who developed NP are shown in table III.

Table I Numbers of patients and length of stay in ICU

ICU	No. of beds	Total patient (n)	Total length of stay (d)	Mean length of stay (d)	
SICU	24	1806	5594	3.1	
 NICU	8	767	2213	2.9	
 GICU	8	636	2132	3.4	
 CICU	8	403	1249	3.1	
MICU	9	495	2086	4.2	
Burn Unit	7	111	1765	15.9	
Total	40	2402	9445	3.9	
Table II Demographic Factors of Study Patients*

	NP patients (n = 163)	Control (n = 163)	t	p	
Age	53.30 ± 16.05	51.50 ± 16.87	0,985	>0,05	
Admission APACHE II	10.86 ± 3.42	10.18 ± 4.56	1,526	>0,05	
Gender			0,454	>0,05	
 Male	98 (60)	102 (63)			
 Female	65 (40)	61 (37)			
Diabetes mellitus	22 (14)	32 (20)	1,49	>0,05	
COPD	36 (22)	11 (7)	4,027	<0.001	
Cardiovascular disease	31 (19)	19 (12)	1,848	>0,05	
Uremia	36 (22)	12 (7)	3,823	<0.001	
Neoplasia	29 (18)	17 (10)	1,914	>0,05	
Immunosuppressive therapy	6 (4)	3 (2)	1,013	>0,05	
Coma	143 (88)	23 (14)	19,58	<0,001	
Trauma	35 (22)	85 (52)	6,038	<0,001	
* Data presented as mean ± SD or No. (%)

Table III Characteristics of patients

Characteristics	MICU	NICU	GICU	CICU	Total	
Age (mean ± SD)	52.9 ± 15.1	50.25 ± 17.57	58.28 ± 14.38	55.00 ± 14.68	53.3 ± 16.1	
Admission APACHE II, (mean ± SD)	11.2 ± 3.3	10.43 ± 3.12	11.03 ± 3.67	11.20 ± 6.38	10.9 ± 3.4	
NP APACHEII, (mean ± SD)	16.2 ± 5.1	14.73 ± 3.94	16.30 ± 4.79	14.80 ± 6.37	15.6 ± 4.7	
Length of stay in ICU (d, mean ± SD)	21.3 ± 21.4	14.42 ± 8.87	19.47 ± 8.20	12.20 ± 3.96	18.0 ± 14.7	
Length of hosp. stay (d, mean ± SD)	25.0 ± 22.5	21.60 ± 11.93	24.78 ± 12.13	18.40 ± 8.26	23.5 ± 16.4	
Overall, 17% of all patients requiring MV (n-724) developed VAP. Thereby, VAP accounts for 75.5% (n = 123) of all patients with NP (n = 163) during the study period (OR: 5,4; 95% CI: 3,36–8,75; p < 0,001) (Table IV). Mechanical ventilation was more frequently used in MICU patients than SICU patients (X2 = 6.6, p < 0.01). Consequently, the incidence of VAP was higher for MICU- than SICU-patients (X2 = 29.2, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, the length of ventilation was higher for patients admitted to MICU (6.3 ± 4.0) than SICU (5.1 ± 3.7), but the difference was not statistically significant.

Table IV Rate of VAP in ICUs

ICU	No. of patients required MV	No. of patients with VAP (%)	
SICU	550	72 (13.1)	
 NICU	 141	 38 (27.0)	
 GICU	 157	 31 (19.7)	
 CICU	 252	 3 (1.2)	
MICU	163	 51 (31.3)	
Burn unit	11	0 (0)	
Total	724	123 (17.0)	
During the study period patients received 3128 ventilation days, with an average duration of 11.3 ± 10.0 days per ventilated patient. The device-related incidence rate for VAP was 39.3/1000 ventilation days. The incidence per 1000 ventilation days was 41.9 in SICU, 36.6 in MICU, 66.0 in NICU, 38.0 in GICU, and 9.1 in CICU patients. The mean onset day of NP after MV was 4.2 ± 3.9 days.

Univariate analysis suggested the following risk factors for the development of NP: the APACHE II score, coma, COPD, uremia, hypoalbuminemia, MV, tracheotomy, enteral feeding, presence of nasogastric tube and previous treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotic (Table V). However, multivariate logistic regression showed that the APACHE II score (OR: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.13–1.33), coma (OR: 2.83; 95% CI: 1.24–6.47), hypoalbuminemia (OR: 2.23; 95% CI: 1.01–4.93), MV (OR: 3.35; 95% CI: 1.71–6.56), tracheotomy (OR: 6.03; 95% CI: 1.36–26.76) and presence of nasogastric tube (OR: 2.68; 95% CI: 1.33–5.41) were significant independent predictive factors for the development of NP.

Table V Results of univariate analysis of potential risk factors for NP

Risk Factors	OR	95% Confidence Interval	p	
Age	1.0	0.99 – 1.02	ns	
APACHE II	1.3	1.22 – 1.38	<0.001	
Coma	6.6	3.75 – 11.48	<0.001	
Trauma	1.7	0.93 – 2.97	ns	
COPD	3.9	1.91 – 8.01	<0.001	
Diabetes mellitus	0.6	0.35 – 1.16	ns	
Central nervous system disorder	1.1	0.71 – 1.77	ns	
Uremia	3.6	1.78–7.14	<0.001	
Hypoalbuminemia	3.3	1.99–5.61	<0.001	
Mechanical ventilation	5.4	3.36–8.75	<0.001	
Tracheotomy	12.5	3.75–41.89	<0.001	
Enteral feeding	13.9	6.38–30.13	<0.001	
Presence of nasogastric	6.3	3.89–10.18	<0.001	
Previous antibiotic treatment	3.3	1.94–5.62	<0.001	
Immunosupressive therapy	2.0	0.50–8.29	ns	
Antacids or H2 antagonist therapy
	0.6	0.25–1.36	ns	
Thoracoabdominal surgery	1.0	0.63–1.69	ns	
ns: non-significant

187 pneumonia episodes were observed during the study period, resulting in the isolation of 257 microorganisms. The most commonly isolated pathogens were Gram-negative bacteria (85.6%). Among these pathogens, A. baumannii (29.6%), P. aeruginosa (20.6%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (14.4%) were the most common.

Empiric antibiotic therapy was based on previous surveillance cultures and the Gram stain results. Therapy was adjusted according to the reports of susceptibility testing.

Crude and attributable mortality were 65% and 52.6%, respectively. The mortality in patients without NP was 26.4% (Table VI). The risk of death was five times higher for patients with NP (OR: 5.2; 95% CI: 3.2–8.3; p < 0,001). The mortality rates were high in high risk pathogens (Table VII). The appropriateness of the empiric therapy did not contribute to increased mortality (Table VIII).

Table VI Comparisons of outcomes between NP and control group

	NP group n (%)	Control group n (%)	X2	p	
Mortality	106 (65.0)	43 (26.4)	47.5	<0.0001	
Improve	57 (35.0)	120 (73.6)			
Attributable mortality	52.6%				
Table VII Mortality rates in high risk pathogens

Microorganism	Mortality/Total (%)	
Gram negative	61/97 (62.9)	
 A. baumannii	31/42 (73.8)	
 P. aeruginosa	19/28 (67.9)	
Gram positive	10/15 (66.7)	
 MRSA	10/14 (71.4)	
Table VIII Appropriateness of empiric therapy and mortality

	Appropriate n (%)	Inappropriate n (%)	X2	p	
Survive	43/121 (35.5)	14/42 (33.3)	0.005	>0.05	
Death	78/121 (64.5)	28/42 (66.7)			
The mean length of stay in the ICU and hospital for the patients with NP were 18.04 ± 14.74 days and 23.49 ± 16.44 days, respectively. The mean length of stay in the ICU and hospital for the control group 3.10 ± 3.03 and 9.64 ± 5.08 days, respectively. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). The extra stay in the control group was 4.36 ± 3.87 and 17.04 ± 14.17 in the patients (p < 0.001).

Discussion
The incidence of NP was reported different in different studies, which may be justified by the presence of different populations with variable ages, underlying diseases, and other associated risk factors. Incidence ranges from 6.8 to 27% [1-4] and also in this study it was 6.8%. Development of NP varies according to the different type of ICUs. Craven et al. [17] reported that the rate of pneumonia was higher in MICU but the difference was not significant. In the present study, the rate of NP and VAP was significantly higher in MICU than SICU, possible due to the differences in the proportion of patients that needed MV and the duration of MV.

MV increases the risk of NP by 3- to 10-fold [1,18-23], resulting in an VAP incidence of 7 to 70% [7-9]. Generally, the duration of mechanical ventilation increases the risk of pneumonia. Cook et al. [24] reported that the rate of VAP increased 3% per day in the first week of ventilation, 2% per day in the second week, and 1% per day in the third week. In this study, 75.5% of the cases with NP occurred in ventilated patients. From 724 patients who required MV 123 (17%) developed VAP. Accordingly, patients on MV had a 3-fold higher risk to develop NP than the non-ventilated patients. Consequently, the use of non-invasive MV should be preferred whenever possible, since it has lower rates of nosocomial infections [25-27].

Coma was described as another important risk factor for NP. In these patients, local defense mechanisms of the respiratory airway are altered, allowing microorganisms to better attach to and colonize the mucosal surface. Furthermore, depression of the level of consciousness significantly increases the chance of aspiration, and as a result development of NP [3,28]. In our study, comatose patients had a 2-fold increased risk of NP.

The causative agents of NP differ by the study population and diagnostic techniques but generally Gram-negative bacteria are the most common ones [3,4,28-33]. Colonization of the oropharynx, trachea or stomach with Gram-negative pathogens has been identified as a risk factor for NP [15,31]. Also in our study, the most common pathogens were Gram-negative bacteria. Furthermore, prior antibiotic therapy and COPD, leading to colonization with Gram-negative aerobic pathogens, were reported to be risk factors for the development of NP [11,28,30,34]. In our patient population, univariate analysis suggested that previous antibiotic treatment and COPD increased the risk of pneumonia, but interestingly they were not independent risk factors in multivariate analysis. Furthermore, the presence of a naso-gastric tube was found to be a risk factor in our study population. Naso-gastric tubes impair the function of the gastroesophageal sphincter and increase the risk of maxillary sinusitis, oropharyngeal colonization and reflux, all of which may lead to migration of bacteria [35]. Accurate evaluation of nutritional status and early initiation of enteral feeding is important in ICUs patients and can aid to preserve the gastrointestinal epithelium and prevent bacterial colonization. However, it may also increase the risk of gastric distention, colonization, aspiration, and pneumonia. Though, to reduce the risk of NP, it is important to avoid unnecessary enteral nutrition [30]. In univariate analysis, we found enteral feeding as a risk factor, but in multivariate analysis it was not an independent risk factor. For a long time it was assumed that increased gastric pH levels e.g. after the use of antacids, would allow Gram-negative microorganisms to multiply in the stomach, and consequently lead to an increased rate of NP. Our study results confirm what was reported by George et al. [36], namely that the use antacids or H2 antagonists did not increase the risk of NP.

In the literature, tracheotomy is described as a significant risk factor for NP. Bronchial colonization during the procedure and (prolonged) continuation of sedation after the procedure will furthermore increase the occurrence of NP [28], a fact that was also seen in our patients. Patients with tracheotomy had a 7-fold increased risk of NP.

The role of advanced age and high APACHE II scores as risk factors of NP are still under discussion. While Kollef et al. [37] report them as significant risk factors, earlier investigations do not support this [1,30]. In our present study, the APACHE II score was a significant risk factor for the development of NP; suggested that the severity of the general condition of the patient was important. Besides, uremia was found as a risk factor in univariate analysis.

Patients with NP have a significantly higher morbidity and mortality [12,35,38]. Heyland et al. [38] reported the crude mortality rate of VAP 23.7% and an attributable mortality rate 32.3%. However, numerous studies have demonstrated that severe underlying illness predisposes patients in the ICU to the development of pneumonia, and their mortality rates are, as a result, high. Survival in patients with NP primarily by the degree of severity of illness at the time of diagnosis [23,39,40]. On the other hand, this does not exclude the possibility that certain subgroups of patients, such as patients with VAP caused by antibiotic resistant bacteria may have had extra attributable mortality rate [1]. In our study, the crude mortality rates for cases and controls were 65.0% and 26.4%, respectively and the mortality rates were highest in high risk pathogens. The mortality rate was five times greater in cases and attributable mortality of NP was 52.6%. Recent clinical investigations suggest that patients receiving inappropriate initial therapy have a greater mortality rate compared to patients receiving antibiotics to which the isolated bacteria were sensitive. However, in this study there was no statistically difference between the mortality rates of the patients who received appropriate and inappropriate initial therapy.

As a result of the increased morbidity, patients with VAP remain hospitalized for 4–17 days longer than controls [35-38]. This observation was confirmed in the present study. The incidence of NP and VAP in MICU were significantly higher than in SICU patients and consequently the length of stay in the MICU was significantly higher than in the SICU.

In conclusion, NP is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in ICU patients. Especially patients on mechanical ventilation are at high risk. Studies determining the impact of "old" and "new" risk factors of NP should repeatedly be performed in order to effectively guide the implementation of preventive measures methods.
==== Refs
Fagon JY Chastre J Hance AJ Montravers P Novara A Gibert C  Nosocomial pneumonia in ventilated patients: A cohort study evaluating attributable mortality and hospital stay Am J Med 1993 94 281 288 8452152 10.1016/0002-9343(93)90060-3 
Vanhems P Lepape A Savey A Jambou P Fabry J  Nosocomial pulmonary infection by antimicrobial-resistant bacteria of patients hospitalized in intensive care units: risk factors and survival J Hosp Infect 2000 45 98 106 10860686 10.1053/jhin.2000.0752 
Rello J Ausina V Castella J Net A Prats G  Nosocomial respiratory tract infections in multiple trauma patients. Influence of level of consciousness with implications for therapy Chest 1992 102 525 529 1643942 
Richards MJ Edwards JR Culver DH Gaynes RP  Nosocomial infections in medical intensive care units in the United States. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System Crit Care Med 1999 27 887 893 10362409 10.1097/00003246-199905000-00020 
Vincent JL Bihari DJ Suter PM  The prevalence of nosocomial infection in intensive care units in Europe. Results of the European Prevalence of Infection in Intensive Care (EPIC) Study. EPIC International Advisory Committee JAMA 1995 274 639 644 7637145 10.1001/jama.274.8.639 
Richards MJ Edwards JR Culver DH Gaynes RP  Nosocomial infections in combined medical-surgical intensive care units in the United States Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000 21 510 515 10968716 
Fagon JY Chastre J Domart Y  Nosocomial pneumonia in patients receiving continous mechanical ventilation: prospective analysis of 52 episodes with use of a protected specimen brush and quatitative culture techniques Am Rev Respir Dis 1989 139 877 884 2930067 
Craven DE Steger KA Barber TW  Preventing nosocomial pneumonia: state of the art and perspectives for the 1990s Am J Med 1991 91 44S 53S 1928191 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90343-V 
Andrews CP Coalson JJ Smith JD Johanson WG Jr Diagnosis of nosocomial bacterial pneumonia in acute, diffuse lung injury Chest 1981 80 254 258 7273874 
George DL  Mayhall CG  Nosocomial pneumonia Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control 1996 Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins 175 195 
Kollef MH  Ventilator-associated pneumonia JAMA 1993 270 1965 1970 8411554 10.1001/jama.270.16.1965 
Kollef MH Silver P Murphy DM Trovillion E  The effect of late-onset ventilator-associated pneumonia in determining patient mortality Chest 1995 108 1655 1662 7497777 
Strausbaugh LJ  Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R  Nosocomial Respiratory Infections Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases 2000 Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia 3020 3028 
Blot S Vandewoude K Colardyn F  Nosocomial bacteremia involving Acinetobacter baumannii in critically ill patients: a matched cohort study Intensive Care Med 2003 29 471 475 12577148 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention  Guidelines for prevention of nosocomial pneumonia MMWR Recomm Rep 1997 46 1 79 
Bonten MJM  Controversies on diagnosis and prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 1999 34 199 204 10403099 10.1016/S0732-8893(99)00040-1 
Craven DE Kunches LM Lichtenberg DA  Nosocomial infection and fatality in medical and surgical intensive care units patients Arch Intern Med 1988 148 1161 1168 3365084 10.1001/archinte.148.5.1161 
Bell RC Coalson JJ Smith JD Johanson WG  Multiple organ system failure and infection in adult respiratory distress syndrome Ann Intern Med 1983 99 293 298 6614678 
Chevret S Hemmer M Carlet J Langer M  Incidence and risk factors of pneumonia acquired in intensive care units. Results from a multicenter prospective study on 996 patients. European Cooperative Group on Nosocomial Pneumonia Intensive Care Med 1993 19 256 264 8408934 
Langer M Mosconi P Cigada M Mandelli M  Long-term respiratory support and risk of pneumonia in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Unit Group of Infection Control Am Rev Respir Dis 1989 140 302 305 2764365 
Celis R Torres A Gatell JM Almela M Rodriquez-Roisin R Agusti-Vidal A  Nosocomial pneumonia. A multivariate analysis of risk and prognosis Chest 1988 93 318 324 3338299 
Cross AS Roup B  Role of respiratory assistance devices in endemicnosocomial pneumonia Am J Med 1981 70 681 685 6938128 10.1016/0002-9343(81)90596-9 
Chastre J Fagon JY  Ventilator-associated pneumonia Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002 165 867 903 11934711 
Cook DJ Walter SD Cook RJ  Incidence of and risk factors for ventilator associated pneumonia in critically ill patients Ann Intern Med 1998 129 433 440 9735080 
Antonelli M Conti G Rocco M  A comparison of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation and conventional mechanical ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure N Engl J Med 1998 339 429 435 9700176 10.1056/NEJM199808133390703 
Nourdine K Combes P Carton MJ Beuret P Cannamela A Ducreux JC  Does noninvasive ventilation reduce the ICU nosocomial infection risk? A prospective clinical survey Intensive Care Med 1999 25 567 573 10416907 10.1007/s001340050904 
Girou E Schortgen F Delclaux C  Association of noninvasive ventilation with nosocomial infections and survival in critically ill patients JAMA 2000 284 2361 2367 11066187 10.1001/jama.284.18.2361 
Ewig S Torres A El-Ebiary M  Bacterial colonization patterns in mechanically ventilated patients with traumatic and medical head injury Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999 159 188 198 9872838 
Georges H Leroy O Guery B Alfandari S Beaucaire G  Predisposingfactors for nosocomial pneumonia in patients receiving mechanical ventilation and requiring tracheotomy Chest 2000 118 767 774 10988201 10.1378/chest.118.3.767 
Memish ZA Cunningham G Oni GA Djazmati W  The incidence and riskfactors of ventilator-associated pneumonia in a Riyadh Hospital Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000 21 271 273 10782591 
Garrouste-Orgeas M Chevret S Arlet G  Oropharyngeal or gasric colonization and nosocomial pneumonia in adult intensive care unit patients Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997 156 1647 1655 9372689 
Rello J Torres A  Microbial causes of ventilator-associated pneumonia Semin Respir Infect 1996 11 24 31 8885060 
Rello J Quintana E Ausina V  Incidence, etiology, and outcome of nosocomial pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients Chest 1991 100 439 444 1864118 
Soler N Torres A Ewig S  Bronchial microbial patients in severe exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requiring mechanical ventilation Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998 157 1498 1505 9603129 
Leal-Noval SR Marquez-Vacaro JA Garcia-Curiel A  Nosocomial pneumonia in patients undergoing heart surgery Crit Care Med 2000 28 935 940 10809262 10.1097/00003246-200004000-00004 
George DL Falk PS Wunderink RG  Epidemiology of ventilator-acquired pneumonia based on protected bronchoscopic sampling Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998 158 1839 1847 9847276 
Kollef MH Prentice D Shapiro SD  Mechanical ventilation with or without daily changes of in-line suction catheters Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997 156 466 472 9279225 
Heyland DK Cook DJ Griffith L Keenan SP Brun-Buisson C  The attributable morbidity and mortality of ventilator-associated pneumonia in the critically ill patient Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999 159 1249 1256 10194173 
Rello J Rue M Jubert P  Survival in patients with nosocomial pneumonia: Impact of the severity of illness and the etiologic agent Crit Care Med 1997 25 1862 1867 9366771 10.1097/00003246-199711000-00026 
Rello J Diaz E  Pneumonia in the intensive care unit Crit care Med 2003 31 2544 2551 14530765 10.1097/01.CCM.0000089928.84326.D2

